The Syndicate

Jackofhearts2005 wrote: ↑Mon Jul 24, 2017 9:41 pm That's crap on the INH list. His top townies were basic non participants (at the time) because they hadn't said anything suspicious yet. That's not remotely helpful.

insertnamehere wrote: ↑Mon Jul 24, 2017 9:46 pm

Jackofhearts2005 wrote: ↑Mon Jul 24, 2017 9:41 pm That's crap on the INH list. His top townies were basic non participants (at the time) because they hadn't said anything suspicious yet. That's not remotely helpful.

Okay, now you're just being willfully ignorant.

The top three were Boom, Sprit, and Quin. None of which are inacts. I admitted that I'm not good at townreading people. You ignore literally everything else I've done, and find one negative thing about a rainbow list, which isn't even accurate.

And you think Golden tunneling? Buddy, you're vice president of the goddamn Boring Company.

Jackofhearts2005 wrote: ↑Mon Jul 24, 2017 9:45 pm

Golden wrote: ↑Mon Jul 24, 2017 9:38 pm

Jackofhearts2005 wrote: ↑Mon Jul 24, 2017 9:36 pm @Golden

I'm silencing myself when I love to heard myself talk or I'm giving my team minus two votes by burning a vote steal on myself?

Who am I teamed with? You, Quin and Speed have been the only ones taking my side for most of the game and I'm suddenly on you and Speed's shortlist.

You're tunneling. Take a step back.

I'm far from tunnelling. I'm working out my vote, and I'm getting you to engage with me. Don't ask me who you're teamed with as though that is convincing, for all I know it's LC and timmer, I don't find the concept persuasive. I have no way to know whether you are being honest about the silencing thing - it rings true, but its wifom.

I've singlehandedly gotten most of the Realms to drop the silencer role by bitching about how being silenced isn't fun.

TonyStarkPrime wrote: ↑Mon Jul 24, 2017 9:44 pm

Golden wrote: ↑Mon Jul 24, 2017 9:39 pm

Quin wrote: ↑Mon Jul 24, 2017 9:39 pm Is there an actual case on Boomslang somewhere?

The case is only his relative absence.

But he's voted every day, which looks a lot more scummy for 16-odd posts.

Quin wrote: ↑Mon Jul 24, 2017 9:49 pm

TonyStarkPrime wrote: ↑Mon Jul 24, 2017 9:44 pm

Golden wrote: ↑Mon Jul 24, 2017 9:39 pm

Quin wrote: ↑Mon Jul 24, 2017 9:39 pm Is there an actual case on Boomslang somewhere?

The case is only his relative absence.

But he's voted every day, which looks a lot more scummy for 16-odd posts.

I don't think so. I care more about the quality of his 16 posts than the fact that he has 16 posts.

Golden wrote: ↑Mon Jul 24, 2017 9:51 pm Tony, anything to say on jacks claims about silencing?

Golden wrote: ↑Mon Jul 24, 2017 9:52 pm Nothing about boomslangs posting rate feels meta indicative to me, he's always quieter.

TonyStarkPrime wrote: ↑Mon Jul 24, 2017 9:53 pm

Golden wrote: ↑Mon Jul 24, 2017 9:51 pm Tony, anything to say on jacks claims about silencing?

He really hates it. I cleared him of being an SMaf the instant he didn't post that day.

Jackofhearts2005 wrote: ↑Mon Jul 24, 2017 9:45 pm I've singlehandedly gotten most of the Realms to drop the silencer role by bitching about how being silenced isn't fun.

Golden wrote: ↑Mon Jul 24, 2017 9:54 pm

TonyStarkPrime wrote: ↑Mon Jul 24, 2017 9:53 pm

Golden wrote: ↑Mon Jul 24, 2017 9:51 pm Tony, anything to say on jacks claims about silencing?

He really hates it. I cleared him of being an SMaf the instant he didn't post that day.

That's helpful thanks.

Golden wrote: ↑Mon Jul 24, 2017 9:47 pm So, Jack, your explanation on the vehement opposition to the rico lynch, initially, was just that in the moment you feared a runaway lynch for bad reasons and you didn't want that to happen? But, now you are open to the idea rico could be bad, so you are backing off how vehement you were a bit?

Jackofhearts2005 wrote: ↑Mon Jul 24, 2017 9:57 pm

Golden wrote: ↑Mon Jul 24, 2017 9:47 pm So, Jack, your explanation on the vehement opposition to the rico lynch, initially, was just that in the moment you feared a runaway lynch for bad reasons and you didn't want that to happen? But, now you are open to the idea rico could be bad, so you are backing off how vehement you were a bit?

Yeah, basically.



@INH

I am super interesting and not a mean person and I have seen a couple naked women.

Stop picking on me.

Golden wrote: ↑Mon Jul 24, 2017 10:00 pm No, because I could vote to lynch you and I don't want to if I'm wrong.

Next - do you have any particular reason why I should not see rico as a politician?

Jackofhearts2005 wrote: ↑Mon Jul 24, 2017 10:03 pm (Like right now, I would love to be able to vote. Like a lot.)

insertnamehere wrote: ↑Mon Jul 24, 2017 10:03 pm The last time TSP did a last-minute vote for me, a civilian got lynched.

Just sayin'.

TonyStarkPrime wrote: ↑Mon Jul 24, 2017 10:04 pm

insertnamehere wrote: ↑Mon Jul 24, 2017 10:03 pm The last time TSP did a last-minute vote for me, a civilian got lynched.

Just sayin'.

Didn't LC get lynched?

LC got lynched.

Quin wrote: ↑Mon Jul 24, 2017 9:53 pm speedchuck, why the sudden 180 on your read of sprityo?

TonyStarkPrime wrote: ↑Mon Jul 24, 2017 10:03 pm

Jackofhearts2005 wrote: ↑Mon Jul 24, 2017 10:03 pm (Like right now, I would love to be able to vote. Like a lot.)

Who'd you have voted for?

speedchuck wrote: ↑Mon Jul 24, 2017 10:06 pm

Quin wrote: ↑Mon Jul 24, 2017 9:53 pm speedchuck, why the sudden 180 on your read of sprityo?

Which one?

I keep going back and forth on Sprit. He's grown a lot as a player since the first time I played with him.

Jackofhearts2005 wrote: ↑Mon Jul 24, 2017 10:07 pm

TonyStarkPrime wrote: ↑Mon Jul 24, 2017 10:03 pm

Jackofhearts2005 wrote: ↑Mon Jul 24, 2017 10:03 pm (Like right now, I would love to be able to vote. Like a lot.)

Who'd you have voted for?

Probably INH but I'd vote either him or Rico to save myself.

If I was king, I might lynch Boomslang.

I really need to go back through the role list. Find out how some know what they know.

speedchuck wrote: ↑Mon Jul 24, 2017 10:09 pm I put Jack on the list for a while, but still can't reconcile him with the silence/vote forcing

linki: I'll have to get back to you on what the latest one is, Quin. I promise I'll answer your question in the next 24 hours. Hold me to it. But I'm going to ISO Sprit in the night period.

Jackofhearts2005 wrote: ↑Mon Jul 24, 2017 10:12 pmAt least a Rico flip tells us something definitive about INH.

Your vote was a poor choice. I don't think you are bad.

Elohcin wrote: ↑Sat Jul 22, 2017 2:19 pm Those in both BV AND ROTTK who haven't been cursed this game and who are still alive: INH, Wilgy, and timmer. So...
Eggs are yummy,
With spinach and cheese.
Today I'll be voting
One of these.

Elohcin wrote: ↑Sat Jul 22, 2017 4:26 pm

TonyStarkPrime wrote: ↑Sat Jul 22, 2017 3:40 pm

LoRab wrote: ↑Sat Jul 22, 2017 3:33 pm

Elohcin wrote: ↑Sat Jul 22, 2017 2:58 pm You can double check my stats, wilgy.

If you look at the lists I posted above, I already did that.
You missed Epi. To be fair, INH had missed him first, and I assume you were basing off his list.

Also, what do you think about Jack's thought that there could be 2 different players on the team who were each in one of the games?

insertnamehere wrote: ↑Sat Jul 22, 2017 3:22 pm Is it really not conceivable to anyone other myself that someone who wasn't directly linked to one of those games either read the thread or was aware of the gimmicks from both games?

I mean, come on. The people insisting that it HAS to be someone who played both games are more than a little suspicious to me right now.

Think of it like this: Rico's curse on D2 attracted a crazy amount of heat for people involved with Blue Velvet. By intentionally choosing to do the same thing with Dom and Rot3k, they're essentially designing a Venn Diagram of people they want us to look at.

Odds are seeming higher and higher to me that the Faceless Old Woman was involved with one at most of these games, and researched gimmicks players used in games she wasn't in to mislead the town and cause mislynches.

There are two possible motives FOW has for cursing people with old-game-specific posting restrictions: Sheer fuckery, or to mislead the town.

I believe it to be the latter.

It seems unlikely, to me, that someone following a game and not playing would know that 2 different self-imposed posts were a thing in 2 different games. I get what you're saying, but I think that it's likely that there are people on that team who were in both games. It's not just that they were both posting restrictions from old games--they were both self imposed restrictions.

I think you're trying to steer us away from those people, which isn't making me feel very good about you.

On the flip, I think you are trying to steer us toward those people, which isn't making me feel very good about you.

Yes, I missed epi because I was following INH's list. So he is now added to the list I wrote earlier: Epi, INH, timmer, and Wilgy. The reaction INH is having here to lorab is off-putting. Isn't it the point of the game to try and find the baddies, make a good case for them, and then try to get others to follow you in lynching who you think is bad? That's all I think lorab is doing here. And she is right that you are trying to steer us clear of the people I just mentioned. I really think out of the four, timmer ia probably not the curser. He's barely been here. I also don't think it's likely that epi is. I don't think he would incriminate himself like that. Wilgy...maybe. You...maybe. I can see either of you doing something like this, but wilgy's reaction to all this talk compared to your reaction screams at you being it.

Elohcin wrote: ↑Sat Jul 22, 2017 7:52 pm Two hours to go. I usually vote by now. I just cannot decide. Plus I don't want my vote to not mean anything. I'm leaning INH #justiceforrico

I'm going to go spend time with family and then vote after the kids go to bed.

Dom wrote: ↑Mon Jul 24, 2017 10:26 pm reasons should be obvious

insertnamehere wrote: ↑Mon Jul 24, 2017 10:26 pmThese kinds of narratives that people push always make me a little nervous, especially when they're ones I know to be false.

insertnamehere wrote: ↑Mon Jul 24, 2017 10:27 pm

Dom wrote: ↑Mon Jul 24, 2017 10:26 pm reasons should be obvious

I guess I'm just a moron, because I don't get them.

Dom wrote: ↑Mon Jul 24, 2017 10:29 pm i'm happy with a tie.
a tie with most players involved would clear some people of marcus, right?

Jackofhearts2005 wrote: ↑Mon Jul 24, 2017 10:32 pm Eloh and Timmer are people I don't know that well but I was vote stolen twice.

Third politician will have played with me a bunch.

insertnamehere wrote: ↑Mon Jul 24, 2017 10:26 pm Can I just address the whole perception that me and sprit are a "team?"

It seemed to pop up multiple times over the course of the day.

We just seemed to have the same read on Elo and Rico, and that's it. No BTSC, no funny business.

These kinds of narratives that people push always make me a little nervous, especially when they're ones I know to be false.