Murder, Mayhem, and Mafia
https://www.mafiathesyndicate.com/
Do you think one of Dom or Epi is bad is the derivative of what you’re askingcolonialbob wrote: ↑Mon Apr 02, 2018 9:42 am Thought - is refrigerator bad?
Kept targeting supatown SVS, targeted me who was (supposedly) unlynchable anyway, now targets Kyle on a day he's likely to get a lot of attention.
Couldn't remember the remaining options, but yes. Although if possible I'd like to separate the questions for now, to avoid halo effect biasing any thoughts on the actions themselves.sprityo wrote: ↑Mon Apr 02, 2018 9:49 amDo you think one of Dom or Epi is bad is the derivative of what you’re askingcolonialbob wrote: ↑Mon Apr 02, 2018 9:42 am Thought - is refrigerator bad?
Kept targeting supatown SVS, targeted me who was (supposedly) unlynchable anyway, now targets Kyle on a day he's likely to get a lot of attention.
Scotty wrote: ↑Fri Mar 30, 2018 4:38 pm Im just gonna try to post this once a phase until I die or the hosts put up a comparable list on the front page, cuz my memory ain’t what it used to be and it's a pain to search for this shit. I’ll do this one with only the facts as we know it:
DEATHS:
Color key:
Out of game, mafia team Evil Evens
Out of game, mafia team Strexcorp
Out of game, Civilian
Out of game, alignment unknown
D1 - Quin (no lynch) (link)
N1 - nijuu (link)
D2 - speedchuck (link)
N2 - Scotty (link)
D3 - nutella (changed from DDL) (link)
N3 - JackofHearts (link)
insertnamehere dies (link)
D4 - Long Con (link)
N4 - No kill (link)
D5 - Long Con (link)
N5 - Sig (link)
D6 - Colonialbob (link)
N6 - SVS (link)
D7 - Marmot (link)
BUTTON
N7 - JackofHearts (link)
Nutella dies (link)
D8 - Marmot (link)
N8 - Sprityo (link)
LoRab Dies (link)
MERGE
D9 - Wilgy (link)
N9 - DharmaHelper (link)
D10 - speedchuck (link)
N10 - No kill (link)
D11- Wilgy (link)
N11 - Dharma Helper (link)
D13 - sig (link)
N13 - Quin (link)
—————————————————————————Current Lives Left (as of D13)
Boomslang - 2
colonialbob - 1
Dom - 2
Dragon D Luffy - 2
Epignosis - 2
insertnamehere - 1
Kylemii - 2
LoRab - 1
Nijuu - 1
Quin - 1
Scotty - 1
Sloonei - 2
SpaceDaisy - 2
sprityo - 1
SVS - 1
He came in on the 2nd half of Day 12, which means this was activated via an unknown ability or it is timed. If someone has been sitting on this power, then it's been for some time now. The last person to gain a 2nd role and still be alive is LoRab back in D9.
Sloonei wrote: ↑Fri Mar 23, 2018 11:07 pm I'm not quite fully on board the speedchuck train right now. I've got ny boarding pass and I'm standing on the platform, but I'm hesitating there. Many signs point to him as bad. I take his effort in recent phases with a grain of salt for two reasons: first, he is speedchuck, and second, scum have about as much incentive to hunt as do civilians in a game with multiple scum teams. If the prevailing assumption about nutella flipping him is true then there's no question. But there could be mechanics we don't know of, somethin else could have prompted his flip, and it could be true. I don't know.
But the mystery of some unknown hypothetical isn't really good enough to move him to a town read for me. His lynch feels more or less inevitable and I think we'd be right to do it. But I'm not certain and I don't want to do it carelessly.
Also I feel plenty good about wilgy too. I don't mind lynching him first. I might be more confident about him.
I don't like the case against INH at all. His vote for wilgy yesterday was not really suspect and it would be the dumbest and most unnecessary slip up ever if that's really what it was. It's not.
Sloonei wrote: ↑Fri Mar 23, 2018 11:39 pmspeedchuck is one of the best fakers i've ever played with. For what it is worthScotty wrote: ↑Fri Mar 23, 2018 11:31 pm @Sloonei I also believe speed looks very townie atm.
It’s what I would do if I wanted the town to trust me when all signs proverbially pointed to me being bad. I’d want to pick it up a notch and put forth my best effort.
He could be town, and in that case I’m super sorry that things are panning out this way.
If he’s good and we lynch him, the best thing he can do in any situation is leave us a legacy, like my uncle.
WHO DO YOU WANT TO VOTE FOR???Sloonei wrote: ↑Sat Mar 24, 2018 11:53 pm Hey why are we all on wilgy now? This thread seems just be barreling down the path of least resistance right now. I'm not saying that's necessarily a bad thing, but there's not a whole lot of critical discussion going on here. What's more fun and exciting than sound critical discussion?
THEN WHY BRING IT UP AT ALL?!
Way to push the narrative.
Nice and subtle, but it's a look-the-other-way and see if anyone looks with you. Maybe that can get the town off systematically lynching the only 4 real candidates of Kyle, Me, Daisy or Sloonei.
"Could be Kyle, but it could also not be kyle. Someone else take the lead, because I don't want to go down this path"
Sloonei wrote: ↑Wed Mar 28, 2018 12:00 pmAm I suspicious for not mentioning it to you earlier?S~V~S wrote: ↑Wed Mar 28, 2018 6:28 am ebwop, also Sloonei has said I was his on;y bad read from when he watched us. But this is his first mention of it, or me (other than in passing about the Speed lynch) since the tribes merged.
Wonder why supaciv did not mention his one bad read in front of me? This was his one mention of it, when he got to Pikachu, but he did not say why and he did not bring it up again.
Also I have not been supaciv in this thread.
Someone really doesn't want to go down this path of lynching.Sloonei wrote: ↑Fri Mar 30, 2018 1:13 pm I am glad I'm not alone in disliking that comment. Not only because it's directed toward me, but because of how unsubstantiated it is. Sig first states that he wants to "even the playing field" (what?) by lynching me (what?), and then after that vaguely alludes to a suspicion against me which has existed all game long but never been substantiated in any meaningful way. I get that that's kind of sig's thing, but he's been making comments like that about me all game without ever backing them up.
That said, I have no interest in defending myself because, in my own humble opinion, I think I look town as fuck and any suspicion against me is paranoid tinfoiling or a blatant fabrication. Lynching me might help some people, but I'd rather not lose a life over that.
Again, pushing this narrative.Sloonei wrote: ↑Fri Mar 30, 2018 2:10 pmIt's not a fully assured idea yet, but it stems from process of elimination when looking at the Pikachu 2.0 crew. Same as what brought me to suspect wilgy earlier. If we assume that the Evil Evens killed sprityo, then there must have been an Even in Pikachu with us.
It is possible that we've been on the wrong path about this and that strex kills on even nights while the Evens kill on odd nights. It is counter-intuitive, but that might be the point. If it weren't for the theory about evens killing sprit, I'd probably not suspect anyone from Pikachu 2.0.
I should look back and see if there was any resistance to the nutella suspicion before she got blown up.
and then votes kyle. But the thing is, no one is really biting on kyle- they all want me dead.Sloonei wrote: ↑Fri Mar 30, 2018 3:45 pm So we can assume there is an Even among these people:
Epginosis
Kylemii
Scotty
Sloonei
Spacedaisy
excluded sprityo because I don't think he killed himself.
This would also mean that the configuration of Pikachu 2.0 was 2 evens vs 2 strex vs 6 townies. (or x-number of townies vs x-number of indies, if we wanna go down that rabbit hole). And we still managed to eliminate two baddies in one day.
"but guyyysss, Scotty is my 2nd choice, let's stick the firrrrst choice, Kyle, who is maybe bad probably?"Sloonei wrote: ↑Sat Mar 31, 2018 12:17 amMaybe. Maybe not. Scotty would be my second choice among that group.
awww. He doesn't really want to lynch me -> doesn't want to lynch me. I think this is genuine. You know why? Because the longer he can delay one of Kyle, Me, Daisy or himself, the longer he won't have to be put on the gallows himself when it goes mislynch after mislynch.
Now I would be remiss and hypocritical if I didn't mention that I also was attempting to steer away from the Pikachu 2.0 sprityo theory yesterday. I did, absolutely, because I felt more thread-based evidence was to be gained from linking Wilgy and Marmot to someone else. If Strex was all on Bidoof 1.0, then we're bound to find at least another Strex on that tribe. Which I think is INH, but that's for another time.Sloonei wrote: ↑Sat Mar 31, 2018 11:42 pmIt's mostly due to me struggling to find either Scotty or Kyle seriously suspicious.Spacedaisy wrote: ↑Sat Mar 31, 2018 11:34 pm I'm kind of confused as to why you are trying so hard to force the Evens to kill on odd nights. All of the evidence points to otherwise.
No you weren't- in my little case against you, I even proved you weren't- and as a matter of fact, after DH did introduce it, you gave some subtle pushback and said:
and pushed your idea that Wilgy was then the one to do so, fitting your narrative.Sloonei wrote:SVS died before we got hereDharmaHelper wrote:And you lot turn up and we start dying straight off.Sloonei wrote: It took like 6 nights for anyone from this tribe to be nightkilled.
Praytell then, what does mafia do?Dragon D. Luffy wrote: ↑Mon Apr 02, 2018 12:58 pm Scotty, mafia doesn't decide not to kill a player just to push some wifom narrative people may or may not adopt.
It’s hard to get bites when all the fish in the lake are floating st the surface
Scotty wrote: ↑Mon Apr 02, 2018 1:06 pmPraytell then, what does mafia do?Dragon D. Luffy wrote: ↑Mon Apr 02, 2018 12:58 pm Scotty, mafia doesn't decide not to kill a player just to push some wifom narrative people may or may not adopt.
In the current form of the discussion, I was. People were moving past it after we lynched wilgy til I heroically stepped forward and brought order and reason back to our midst. Plus DH's argument was different anyway. He was just arguing that a member of Cerberus killed sprit because it happened when we showed up. I have been arguing that sprit was killed by a member of the Evil Evens who was there with us for days. Why would I perform a kill and then immediately start screaming for everyone to look at me as the culprit?Scotty wrote: ↑Mon Apr 02, 2018 1:04 pmNo you weren't- in my little case against you, I even proved you weren't- and as a matter of fact, after DH did introduce it, you gave some subtle pushback and said:and pushed your idea that Wilgy was then the one to do so, fitting your narrative.Sloonei wrote:SVS died before we got hereDharmaHelper wrote:And you lot turn up and we start dying straight off.Sloonei wrote: It took like 6 nights for anyone from this tribe to be nightkilled.
maybe, but there's no true way of knowing this. I looked up Kyle's participation during N10- he posted a bevy of times and could have easily been around to submit a kill.
You're telling me that a mafia team has never outright held off on a kill in order to incite discussion?Dragon D. Luffy wrote: ↑Mon Apr 02, 2018 1:08 pm Sorry broken quote.
They kill people.
Not killing people means there is one more civ they have to lynch.
Easy. Someone else already brought it up, it was a valid argument, so you go along with it to look town. And you weren't screaming about it, man. You were squeaking about it. Sometimes putting things out there and saying 'I could be bad, see?' is a great way to give yourself credibilitySloonei wrote: ↑Mon Apr 02, 2018 1:09 pmIn the current form of the discussion, I was. People were moving past it after we lynched wilgy til I heroically stepped forward and brought order and reason back to our midst. Plus DH's argument was different anyway. He was just arguing that a member of Cerberus killed sprit because it happened when we showed up. I have been arguing that sprit was killed by a member of the Evil Evens who was there with us for days. Why would I perform a kill and then immediately start screaming for everyone to look at me as the culprit?Scotty wrote: ↑Mon Apr 02, 2018 1:04 pmNo you weren't- in my little case against you, I even proved you weren't- and as a matter of fact, after DH did introduce it, you gave some subtle pushback and said:and pushed your idea that Wilgy was then the one to do so, fitting your narrative.Sloonei wrote:SVS died before we got hereDharmaHelper wrote:And you lot turn up and we start dying straight off.Sloonei wrote: It took like 6 nights for anyone from this tribe to be nightkilled.
To be clear, you think I withheld a kill on Night 10 so that I could implicate wilgy, even though I knew it would be revealed that he was not responsible for the missed kill immediately after, and was more than likely going to be lynched next anyway?Scotty wrote: ↑Mon Apr 02, 2018 1:09 pmmaybe, but there's no true way of knowing this. I looked up Kyle's participation during N10- he posted a bevy of times and could have easily been around to submit a kill.
This could be the case, sure. I'm not convinced though.
At the end of the day, the remaining candidates (You, SD, Kyle and Epi) all have 2 lives, so I would very much like to be right here so we don't go through and mislynch everyone until we get to you. Because if kyle's good, then he's a very easy scapegoat here.
Why is it that when I do something you don't like I'm "pushing narratives" but when I do something that might be good I'm "squeaking"?Scotty wrote: ↑Mon Apr 02, 2018 1:13 pmEasy. Someone else already brought it up, it was a valid argument, so you go along with it to look town. And you weren't screaming about it, man. You were squeaking about it. Sometimes putting things out there and saying 'I could be bad, see?' is a great way to give yourself credibilitySloonei wrote: ↑Mon Apr 02, 2018 1:09 pmIn the current form of the discussion, I was. People were moving past it after we lynched wilgy til I heroically stepped forward and brought order and reason back to our midst. Plus DH's argument was different anyway. He was just arguing that a member of Cerberus killed sprit because it happened when we showed up. I have been arguing that sprit was killed by a member of the Evil Evens who was there with us for days. Why would I perform a kill and then immediately start screaming for everyone to look at me as the culprit?Scotty wrote: ↑Mon Apr 02, 2018 1:04 pmNo you weren't- in my little case against you, I even proved you weren't- and as a matter of fact, after DH did introduce it, you gave some subtle pushback and said:and pushed your idea that Wilgy was then the one to do so, fitting your narrative.Sloonei wrote:SVS died before we got hereDharmaHelper wrote:And you lot turn up and we start dying straight off.Sloonei wrote: It took like 6 nights for anyone from this tribe to be nightkilled.
Sure.Sloonei wrote: ↑Mon Apr 02, 2018 1:14 pmTo be clear, you think I withheld a kill on Night 10 so that I could implicate wilgy, even though I knew it would be revealed that he was not responsible for the missed kill immediately after, and was more than likely going to be lynched next anyway?Scotty wrote: ↑Mon Apr 02, 2018 1:09 pmmaybe, but there's no true way of knowing this. I looked up Kyle's participation during N10- he posted a bevy of times and could have easily been around to submit a kill.
This could be the case, sure. I'm not convinced though.
At the end of the day, the remaining candidates (You, SD, Kyle and Epi) all have 2 lives, so I would very much like to be right here so we don't go through and mislynch everyone until we get to you. Because if kyle's good, then he's a very easy scapegoat here.
I'm insulted that you'd think I'd approach the game this way if I was bad. That is dumb.Scotty wrote: ↑Mon Apr 02, 2018 1:17 pmSure.Sloonei wrote: ↑Mon Apr 02, 2018 1:14 pmTo be clear, you think I withheld a kill on Night 10 so that I could implicate wilgy, even though I knew it would be revealed that he was not responsible for the missed kill immediately after, and was more than likely going to be lynched next anyway?Scotty wrote: ↑Mon Apr 02, 2018 1:09 pmmaybe, but there's no true way of knowing this. I looked up Kyle's participation during N10- he posted a bevy of times and could have easily been around to submit a kill.
This could be the case, sure. I'm not convinced though.
At the end of the day, the remaining candidates (You, SD, Kyle and Epi) all have 2 lives, so I would very much like to be right here so we don't go through and mislynch everyone until we get to you. Because if kyle's good, then he's a very easy scapegoat here.
Or as I said, other things could have happened and the kill wasn't purposely withheld. Could have been a block or a save or something. But when it didn't go through, in any case, it was an easy next step to continue pushing for wilgy.
I'm looking at you under a lens, so pushing narratives is just another way of how it fits my thinking. And I'm not comparing you doing "something good". I'm saying you were hardly screaming for people to start looking at you as a culprit. I think I did a pretty good job of pointing out that you were doing it out of necessity because everyone else was looking that way.Sloonei wrote: ↑Mon Apr 02, 2018 1:15 pmWhy is it that when I do something you don't like I'm "pushing narratives" but when I do something that might be good I'm "squeaking"?Scotty wrote: ↑Mon Apr 02, 2018 1:13 pmEasy. Someone else already brought it up, it was a valid argument, so you go along with it to look town. And you weren't screaming about it, man. You were squeaking about it. Sometimes putting things out there and saying 'I could be bad, see?' is a great way to give yourself credibilitySloonei wrote: ↑Mon Apr 02, 2018 1:09 pmIn the current form of the discussion, I was. People were moving past it after we lynched wilgy til I heroically stepped forward and brought order and reason back to our midst. Plus DH's argument was different anyway. He was just arguing that a member of Cerberus killed sprit because it happened when we showed up. I have been arguing that sprit was killed by a member of the Evil Evens who was there with us for days. Why would I perform a kill and then immediately start screaming for everyone to look at me as the culprit?Scotty wrote: ↑Mon Apr 02, 2018 1:04 pmNo you weren't- in my little case against you, I even proved you weren't- and as a matter of fact, after DH did introduce it, you gave some subtle pushback and said:and pushed your idea that Wilgy was then the one to do so, fitting your narrative.Sloonei wrote:SVS died before we got hereDharmaHelper wrote:And you lot turn up and we start dying straight off.Sloonei wrote: It took like 6 nights for anyone from this tribe to be nightkilled.
Dude, I dunno what you would do as a baddie. Sorry you're insulted. How the kill failed is irrelevant anyway, it's how you framed it.Sloonei wrote: ↑Mon Apr 02, 2018 1:18 pmI'm insulted that you'd think I'd approach the game this way if I was bad. That is dumb.Scotty wrote: ↑Mon Apr 02, 2018 1:17 pmSure.Sloonei wrote: ↑Mon Apr 02, 2018 1:14 pmTo be clear, you think I withheld a kill on Night 10 so that I could implicate wilgy, even though I knew it would be revealed that he was not responsible for the missed kill immediately after, and was more than likely going to be lynched next anyway?Scotty wrote: ↑Mon Apr 02, 2018 1:09 pmmaybe, but there's no true way of knowing this. I looked up Kyle's participation during N10- he posted a bevy of times and could have easily been around to submit a kill.
This could be the case, sure. I'm not convinced though.
At the end of the day, the remaining candidates (You, SD, Kyle and Epi) all have 2 lives, so I would very much like to be right here so we don't go through and mislynch everyone until we get to you. Because if kyle's good, then he's a very easy scapegoat here.
Or as I said, other things could have happened and the kill wasn't purposely withheld. Could have been a block or a save or something. But when it didn't go through, in any case, it was an easy next step to continue pushing for wilgy.
... were they?Scotty wrote: ↑Mon Apr 02, 2018 1:19 pmI'm looking at you under a lens, so pushing narratives is just another way of how it fits my thinking. And I'm not comparing you doing "something good". I'm saying you were hardly screaming for people to start looking at you as a culprit. I think I did a pretty good job of pointing out that you were doing it out of necessity because everyone else was looking that way.Sloonei wrote: ↑Mon Apr 02, 2018 1:15 pmWhy is it that when I do something you don't like I'm "pushing narratives" but when I do something that might be good I'm "squeaking"?Scotty wrote: ↑Mon Apr 02, 2018 1:13 pmEasy. Someone else already brought it up, it was a valid argument, so you go along with it to look town. And you weren't screaming about it, man. You were squeaking about it. Sometimes putting things out there and saying 'I could be bad, see?' is a great way to give yourself credibilitySloonei wrote: ↑Mon Apr 02, 2018 1:09 pmIn the current form of the discussion, I was. People were moving past it after we lynched wilgy til I heroically stepped forward and brought order and reason back to our midst. Plus DH's argument was different anyway. He was just arguing that a member of Cerberus killed sprit because it happened when we showed up. I have been arguing that sprit was killed by a member of the Evil Evens who was there with us for days. Why would I perform a kill and then immediately start screaming for everyone to look at me as the culprit?Scotty wrote: ↑Mon Apr 02, 2018 1:04 pmNo you weren't- in my little case against you, I even proved you weren't- and as a matter of fact, after DH did introduce it, you gave some subtle pushback and said:and pushed your idea that Wilgy was then the one to do so, fitting your narrative.Sloonei wrote:SVS died before we got hereDharmaHelper wrote: And you lot turn up and we start dying straight off.
Just being facetious, not actually insulted.Scotty wrote: ↑Mon Apr 02, 2018 1:20 pmDude, I dunno what you would do as a baddie. Sorry you're insulted. How the kill failed is irrelevant anyway, it's how you framed it.Sloonei wrote: ↑Mon Apr 02, 2018 1:18 pmI'm insulted that you'd think I'd approach the game this way if I was bad. That is dumb.Scotty wrote: ↑Mon Apr 02, 2018 1:17 pmSure.Sloonei wrote: ↑Mon Apr 02, 2018 1:14 pmTo be clear, you think I withheld a kill on Night 10 so that I could implicate wilgy, even though I knew it would be revealed that he was not responsible for the missed kill immediately after, and was more than likely going to be lynched next anyway?Scotty wrote: ↑Mon Apr 02, 2018 1:09 pmmaybe, but there's no true way of knowing this. I looked up Kyle's participation during N10- he posted a bevy of times and could have easily been around to submit a kill.
This could be the case, sure. I'm not convinced though.
At the end of the day, the remaining candidates (You, SD, Kyle and Epi) all have 2 lives, so I would very much like to be right here so we don't go through and mislynch everyone until we get to you. Because if kyle's good, then he's a very easy scapegoat here.
Or as I said, other things could have happened and the kill wasn't purposely withheld. Could have been a block or a save or something. But when it didn't go through, in any case, it was an easy next step to continue pushing for wilgy.
A reasonable assumptionSloonei wrote: ↑Mon Apr 02, 2018 1:29 pm Another thing I want to point out for the sake of discussion: there's been talk about how we can't rely on certain roles fitting their normal mold in terms of alignment. Something that would intuitively seem like a civilian role might not be so here, and vice versa. How much validity to do we all give to this speculation right now, on Day 13, with the situation being what it is?
Who do you think we should lynch today?sprityo wrote: ↑Mon Apr 02, 2018 1:33 pmA reasonable assumptionSloonei wrote: ↑Mon Apr 02, 2018 1:29 pm Another thing I want to point out for the sake of discussion: there's been talk about how we can't rely on certain roles fitting their normal mold in terms of alignment. Something that would intuitively seem like a civilian role might not be so here, and vice versa. How much validity to do we all give to this speculation right now, on Day 13, with the situation being what it is?
"Never" is a strong word. There may have been some cases here and there, if it results in a mafia being fasely confirmed civ or something like that.Scotty wrote: ↑Mon Apr 02, 2018 1:11 pmYou're telling me that a mafia team has never outright held off on a kill in order to incite discussion?Dragon D. Luffy wrote: ↑Mon Apr 02, 2018 1:08 pm Sorry broken quote.
They kill people.
Not killing people means there is one more civ they have to lynch.
Good point. Who do you want to vote for today?Dragon D. Luffy wrote: ↑Mon Apr 02, 2018 1:43 pm Based on what I have seen so far, my opinion on this game is that it's imbalanced in town's favor, and the main reason for that is that mafia's number of available night kills is very low.
Not killing people on purpose? That's suicidal. A mafia team that does that will get POE'd into oblivion.
ok then, so are you under the assumption that N10 was quiet on account of inactivity or something else entirely?Dragon D. Luffy wrote: ↑Mon Apr 02, 2018 1:43 pm Based on what I have seen so far, my opinion on this game is that it's imbalanced in town's favor, and the main reason for that is that mafia's number of available night kills is very low.
Not killing people on purpose? That's suicidal. A mafia team that does that will get POE'd into oblivion.
InactivityScotty wrote: ↑Mon Apr 02, 2018 1:49 pmok then, so are you under the assumption that N10 was quiet on account of inactivity or something else entirely?Dragon D. Luffy wrote: ↑Mon Apr 02, 2018 1:43 pm Based on what I have seen so far, my opinion on this game is that it's imbalanced in town's favor, and the main reason for that is that mafia's number of available night kills is very low.
Not killing people on purpose? That's suicidal. A mafia team that does that will get POE'd into oblivion.
Right now I'm between Bob and you, but I could get convinced to vote for Lorab or Booms I think.Sloonei wrote: ↑Mon Apr 02, 2018 1:48 pmGood point. Who do you want to vote for today?Dragon D. Luffy wrote: ↑Mon Apr 02, 2018 1:43 pm Based on what I have seen so far, my opinion on this game is that it's imbalanced in town's favor, and the main reason for that is that mafia's number of available night kills is very low.
Not killing people on purpose? That's suicidal. A mafia team that does that will get POE'd into oblivion.
Am I just on here by process of elimination? Why are scotty and kyle stronger town reads?Dragon D. Luffy wrote: ↑Mon Apr 02, 2018 1:57 pmRight now I'm between Bob and you, but I could get convinced to vote for Lorab or Booms I think.Sloonei wrote: ↑Mon Apr 02, 2018 1:48 pmGood point. Who do you want to vote for today?Dragon D. Luffy wrote: ↑Mon Apr 02, 2018 1:43 pm Based on what I have seen so far, my opinion on this game is that it's imbalanced in town's favor, and the main reason for that is that mafia's number of available night kills is very low.
Not killing people on purpose? That's suicidal. A mafia team that does that will get POE'd into oblivion.
Scotty gives me good vibes in general and I feel like he's is one of the main suspects in every single game I've played with him.Sloonei wrote: ↑Mon Apr 02, 2018 2:00 pmAm I just on here by process of elimination? Why are scotty and kyle stronger town reads?Dragon D. Luffy wrote: ↑Mon Apr 02, 2018 1:57 pmRight now I'm between Bob and you, but I could get convinced to vote for Lorab or Booms I think.Sloonei wrote: ↑Mon Apr 02, 2018 1:48 pmGood point. Who do you want to vote for today?Dragon D. Luffy wrote: ↑Mon Apr 02, 2018 1:43 pm Based on what I have seen so far, my opinion on this game is that it's imbalanced in town's favor, and the main reason for that is that mafia's number of available night kills is very low.
Not killing people on purpose? That's suicidal. A mafia team that does that will get POE'd into oblivion.
I don't have strong reads on any of the other three you named.
