Re: Watchmen [Night 6]
Posted: Sun Jul 26, 2015 8:55 pm
Seriously though, given his role, there is no reason for him to suspect me of being a baddie. WTF dude?
Cookie wrote:I find G-Man's vote curious, though.. Why MP?
Unless Joe is dead Mr. Sillypants.G-Man wrote:Seriously though, given his role, there is no reason for him to suspect me of being a baddie. WTF dude?
Wait it's 4am and I don't get what either of you are saying.Metalmarsh89 wrote:Unless Joe is dead Mr. Sillypants.G-Man wrote:Seriously though, given his role, there is no reason for him to suspect me of being a baddie. WTF dude?
MP was the tracker Steven Fine. When he tracks someone, Joe gets the results. If Joe is dead, MP's role is worthless, right?Ricochet wrote:Wait it's 4am and I don't get what either of you are saying.Metalmarsh89 wrote:Unless Joe is dead Mr. Sillypants.G-Man wrote:Seriously though, given his role, there is no reason for him to suspect me of being a baddie. WTF dude?
Bullshit.Metalmarsh89 wrote:MP was the tracker Steven Fine. When he tracks someone, Joe gets the results. If Joe is dead, MP's role is worthless, right?Ricochet wrote:Wait it's 4am and I don't get what either of you are saying.Metalmarsh89 wrote:Unless Joe is dead Mr. Sillypants.G-Man wrote:Seriously though, given his role, there is no reason for him to suspect me of being a baddie. WTF dude?
Epignosis wrote: Detective Steven Fine
Tracks on Odd Nights. Bourquin gets the result too.
Detective Joe Bourquin
Tracks on Even Nights. Fine gets the result too.
You're dead you deadie-deader-mcdeaderson.DharmaHelper wrote:Whats gonna happen
Why? Couldn't he still hint in the thread his findings?Metalmarsh89 wrote:MP was the tracker Steven Fine. When he tracks someone, Joe gets the results. If Joe is dead, MP's role is worthless, right?Ricochet wrote:Wait it's 4am and I don't get what either of you are saying.Metalmarsh89 wrote:Unless Joe is dead Mr. Sillypants.G-Man wrote:Seriously though, given his role, there is no reason for him to suspect me of being a baddie. WTF dude?
Perhaps a clarification is in order?G-Man wrote:Bullshit.Metalmarsh89 wrote:MP was the tracker Steven Fine. When he tracks someone, Joe gets the results. If Joe is dead, MP's role is worthless, right?Ricochet wrote:Wait it's 4am and I don't get what either of you are saying.Metalmarsh89 wrote:Unless Joe is dead Mr. Sillypants.G-Man wrote:Seriously though, given his role, there is no reason for him to suspect me of being a baddie. WTF dude?
Epignosis wrote: Detective Steven Fine
Tracks on Odd Nights. Bourquin gets the result too.
Detective Joe Bourquin
Tracks on Even Nights. Fine gets the result too.
I'm in tears, bro.MovingPictures07 wrote:![]()
Most disappointing and frustrating death of all time. Thanks guys.
That makes no sense.G-Man wrote:Seriously though, given his role, there is no reason for him to suspect me of being a baddie. WTF dude?
The only tracker I've seen is where you follow a player, and find out who they visit, but not a power they use.G-Man wrote:This development also baffles me due to the way he went after Elo. What kind of evidence does "tracker" dig up? When I've called a role a tracker, it meant that role could see if someone used a power on anyone else.
Ricochet wrote:You know what's hilarious?
GOOF-MAN IS NOW ON RORSCHACH'S LIST
Can we...can we get a revote?Dragon D. Luffy wrote:Oh ffs
Someone find a wall I can bang my head into.
I'm deeply sorrry MP. I guess I just tunneled hard on you and did not want to step back.
Oh, I know exactly how you're feeling right now.G-Man wrote:This development also baffles me due to the way he went after Elo. What kind of evidence does "tracker" dig up? When I've called a role a tracker, it meant that role could see if someone used a power on anyone else.
Ok gotcha.Epignosis wrote:Please read the roles. The word "too" has a function.
Maybe I was just never close enough to the top of his list to warrant a check. He sure seemed to mention me quite a bit.Dragon D. Luffy wrote:That makes no sense.G-Man wrote:Seriously though, given his role, there is no reason for him to suspect me of being a baddie. WTF dude?
1- You are assuming the detectives bothered to track you.
2- That the other detective is alive, or was alive long enough to track you.
3- That a negative result on a track targeted at you would be a proof that you are a civ. It's not, because for most of this game there were two possible mafia killers.
Interesting. I know Watchers get vague info on who visits the target but not specific powers used. Trackers were always a higher degree of specificity. That's how I used them in games at least.Metalmarsh89 wrote:The only tracker I've seen is where you follow a player, and find out who they visit, but not a power they use.G-Man wrote:This development also baffles me due to the way he went after Elo. What kind of evidence does "tracker" dig up? When I've called a role a tracker, it meant that role could see if someone used a power on anyone else.
But MP went after Elohcin Day 5, so if he learned anything it would have been from Night 3, or Night 1.
Why did you vote for LoRab then if you were so sure?Cookie wrote:Crap. I was so sure he was an Inmate. RIP and sorry.
From what I know, watchers find out who used on ability on X. Trackers find out who X used an ability on. With X being the person the tracker/watcher chose to target in the night. They may or may not also find the nature of the ability, depending on the setup, but usually they don't.G-Man wrote: Interesting. I know Watchers get vague info on who visits the target but not specific powers used. Trackers were always a higher degree of specificity. That's how I used them in games at least.
MP tracked on Nights 1 & 3, and Eloh could only target Bernard the News Vendor with her role, but Bernard the News Vendor was still live on Night 4.Scotty wrote:I'm now firmly in the camp that GMan is either Rorschach or Morlock. I'm leaning towards the latter.
I looked up tracking and it does not learn the role of the target, but what they do. I was sorely confused on that point.
So I'm curious if and when MP tracked Ehlo that would give him info that led to her demise? Maybe she did something that night to the target that died? That would make sense, right? So maybe she sent back her info to Bernard and Bernard died that night? I don't remember seeing Bernard post recently, so that would make sense for MP to tunnel.
I explained that when I voted LoRab. I didn't want to lynch someone who couldn't talk and the alternative was to lynch someone else I thought (and still think) is an Inmate.Scotty wrote:Why did you vote for LoRab then if you were so sure?Cookie wrote:Crap. I was so sure he was an Inmate. RIP and sorry.
HMMMMMMMMM?
Sorry Scotty, I'm used to the first variation on the tracker. The vanilla tracker approach is you get a yes or no answer on whether they used a power on another player (in general). I think that original iteration of tracking was too vanilla for the folks at LP, STV, TP, and RM. I could be wrong here because each host is different. But that is how I've always encountered and used a tracker.Scotty wrote:I'm now firmly in the camp that GMan is either Rorschach or Morlock. I'm leaning towards the latter.
I looked up tracking and it does not learn the role of the target, but what they do. I was sorely confused on that point.
So I'm curious if and when MP tracked Ehlo that would give him info that led to her demise? Maybe she did something that night to the target that died? That would make sense, right? So maybe she sent back her info to Bernard and Bernard died that night? I don't remember seeing Bernard post recently, so that would make sense for MP to tunnel.
Ah I see I missed that post. You are correct, you did say that, my bad.Cookie wrote:I explained that when I voted LoRab. I didn't want to lynch someone who couldn't talk and the alternative was to lynch someone else I thought (and still think) is an Inmate.Scotty wrote:Why did you vote for LoRab then if you were so sure?Cookie wrote:Crap. I was so sure he was an Inmate. RIP and sorry.
HMMMMMMMMM?
I don't see how it helps us either, but there's nothing bad about speculating.Metalmarsh89 wrote:I dunno if we should be dwelling too much on vote patterns at this point. With only one inmate left, they have no one to protect but him/herself.
Linki @DDL: I'm not sure how that would help us out? If MP knew Bernard's role and tracked Elohcin to visit Bernard, wouldn't he consider the possibilities of who could have visited Bernard? Maybe he just tunneled, but he did bet his mafia reputation on it (whatever that means).
Spoilers below:Scotty wrote:Ah I see I missed that post. You are correct, you did say that, my bad.Cookie wrote:I explained that when I voted LoRab. I didn't want to lynch someone who couldn't talk and the alternative was to lynch someone else I thought (and still think) is an Inmate.Scotty wrote:Why did you vote for LoRab then if you were so sure?Cookie wrote:Crap. I was so sure he was an Inmate. RIP and sorry.
HMMMMMMMMM?
If you are sure that someone is bad, then why not commit to your read, regardless of a silent treatment?
im still on phone right now, but going back a few pages on the info received from [what I presume to be] Ozymandias. I don't know the source material at all. Why is Ozymandias' info not to be trusted if he's a watchman? What does he do in the movie/comic?
linki- thanks GMan
I think MP07 just said he'd bet his reputation on Eloh being bad to be dramatic. It's probably not the first time he's said it but it might be the last. I just happened to be in a snarky enough mood to call him out on it because my spreadsheet suggested otherwise by a long shot. Depending on the type of tracker Epi used, it's possible he tracked Eloh and misinterpreted the result. As a tracker though, you have to be aware of the other roles that might lead you to such a misinterpretation. I think he let thread content and player reads/vibes get in the way of his understanding of the role mechanics.Dragon D. Luffy wrote:I don't see how it helps us either, but there's nothing bad about speculating.Metalmarsh89 wrote:I dunno if we should be dwelling too much on vote patterns at this point. With only one inmate left, they have no one to protect but him/herself.
Linki @DDL: I'm not sure how that would help us out? If MP knew Bernard's role and tracked Elohcin to visit Bernard, wouldn't he consider the possibilities of who could have visited Bernard? Maybe he just tunneled, but he did bet his mafia reputation on it (whatever that means).
Actually, the fact MP bet his reputation would make more sense if he had night info and thought the probability of that info being wrong was too low (and in this case it probably was).
Did we never figure out what this was? Silk Spectre's apartment? It was used in the lynch of espers, but leading up to it...wth? Why Silk Spectre's apartment, if that's what it was?Epignosis wrote:
Hmmm. indeed.
You're golden, I think I'm on the chopping block unfortunately.LoRab wrote:Disappointing result. My being lynched would have been equally disappinting. Not sure a lynch of cookie would have been bad, having voted that way and all.
Thoughs haven't changed since I went to sleep. Hope to survive the night.
So who do you see me is being elimininaed from that problem?Scotty wrote:You're golden, I think I'm on the chopping block unfortunately.LoRab wrote:Disappointing result. My being lynched would have been equally disappinting. Not sure a lynch of cookie would have been bad, having voted that way and all.
Thoughs haven't changed since I went to sleep. Hope to survive the night.
Shame, because I feel like we really could have eliminated that problem.
That sentence doesn't make sense.LoRab wrote:So who do you see me is being elimininaed from that problem?Scotty wrote:You're golden, I think I'm on the chopping block unfortunately.LoRab wrote:Disappointing result. My being lynched would have been equally disappinting. Not sure a lynch of cookie would have been bad, having voted that way and all.
Thoughs haven't changed since I went to sleep. Hope to survive the night.
Shame, because I feel like we really could have eliminated that problem.
Sadly no. I'm probably not allowed to talk about the specifics of it. I think I know (generally speaking) how I'm supposed to crack it but when I try to decode it the way I think I'm supposed to, it's just more gibberish. If I was good at deciphering codes, I'd probably be more frustrated. I'm more of a logic puzzle person, so I'm not sweating the fact that I can't figure it out.Scotty wrote:Hmmm. indeed.
GMan, any luck on your cipher?
Scotty- do you think you're likely to get killed tonight or lynched tomorrow? I personally see no reason for you to be lynched, so I'm assuming you think Big Figure will come after you.Scotty wrote:You're golden, I think I'm on the chopping block unfortunately.LoRab wrote:Disappointing result. My being lynched would have been equally disappinting. Not sure a lynch of cookie would have been bad, having voted that way and all.
Thoughs haven't changed since I went to sleep. Hope to survive the night.
Shame, because I feel like we really could have eliminated that problem.
DDL, this seems far-fetched to me. It's purporting that things happened that we don't even know CAN happen. And as I reminded Scotty before, Ozymandias likely doesn't have any more info than we do.Dragon D. Luffy wrote:@MM: But what if MP knew Bernard's role from another source? For instance, a BTSC with Silk Spectre, or a message from Ozymandias (since apparently Ozy is sending messages).
That would also mean Bernard is Juliets, since MP's tunneling on Eloh only really started on D5 I think.
Your spreadsheet seems pretty good. What else does it say?G-Man wrote:I think MP07 just said he'd bet his reputation on Eloh being bad to be dramatic. It's probably not the first time he's said it but it might be the last. I just happened to be in a snarky enough mood to call him out on it because my spreadsheet suggested otherwise by a long shot. Depending on the type of tracker Epi used, it's possible he tracked Eloh and misinterpreted the result. As a tracker though, you have to be aware of the other roles that might lead you to such a misinterpretation. I think he let thread content and player reads/vibes get in the way of his understanding of the role mechanics.Dragon D. Luffy wrote:I don't see how it helps us either, but there's nothing bad about speculating.Metalmarsh89 wrote:I dunno if we should be dwelling too much on vote patterns at this point. With only one inmate left, they have no one to protect but him/herself.
Linki @DDL: I'm not sure how that would help us out? If MP knew Bernard's role and tracked Elohcin to visit Bernard, wouldn't he consider the possibilities of who could have visited Bernard? Maybe he just tunneled, but he did bet his mafia reputation on it (whatever that means).
Actually, the fact MP bet his reputation would make more sense if he had night info and thought the probability of that info being wrong was too low (and in this case it probably was).
You see no reason? I do. I've been rezzed, and no one has really looked into my case. Except maybe Rico and a bit of Russ (who just says he patently disagrees with me). I was wondering why no one killing MP until you realized he was making bad reads all game.G-Man wrote:Scotty- do you think you're likely to get killed tonight or lynched tomorrow? I personally see no reason for you to be lynched, so I'm assuming you think Big Figure will come after you.Scotty wrote:You're golden, I think I'm on the chopping block unfortunately.LoRab wrote:Disappointing result. My being lynched would have been equally disappinting. Not sure a lynch of cookie would have been bad, having voted that way and all.
Thoughs haven't changed since I went to sleep. Hope to survive the night.
Shame, because I feel like we really could have eliminated that problem.
What I find interesting is that you got on board with MP07's theories after you were rezzed even though he went after you Day 1 for what I though was a very unsound case. Not saying it's suspicious though. I'm just dying to know why you got on board with him after he tried to railroad you.