The Syndicate

Epignosis wrote:

bea wrote:

Turnip Head wrote:

DFaraday wrote:Effective now, Bea has replaced Summer. Everyone welcome Bea!

Welcome, Bea! I'll miss Summer though, she seemed like a cool player for the little time she was around.

Still no WOG or substitute WOG 0_0

Thanks TH! Nice to see you playing again!!


Can anyone help a sista out? I'll admit - I've been drinking and football and cooking today so my ability to mafia today begins and ends with this post. I have NO idea what's going on. But I'm off tomorrow and can play catch up - anyone that could give me crib notes would be like so so so awesome. It's N5 of a full game. Please help me cull the reading

Hedgeowl is bad. The end.

Epilogue: So was MP, so you can read his posts with that in mind.

Hedgeowl wrote:I am not bad or the SK. I gotta admit you are having a terrible game for lynching civs Epi.

Hedgeowl wrote:First of all, me declaring my intentions in my first posts of looking at top posters (it was the top 10 btw, not 11 since Mongoose was dead) and voting for one, you btw, is not ok apparently.

Hedgeowl wrote: But you declaring you will vote for k4j and then saying you never suspected him is fine.

Hedgeowl wrote:And how is your vote not trying to help "save" MP? You were in the thread with everyone discussing the best way to "save" MP. You even saw 2 of his 4 tells you claimed and you trusted him.

Hedgeowl wrote:TH came up with WOG as a good vote option and explained his reasons and you were the 2nd voter! So, how is it not possible that you could have been trying to save him? Your "case" on me is grasping a lot and you still didnt answer any of my questions.

Hedgeowl wrote:Pot meet kettle, is the phrase you have used before sir.

Hedgeowl wrote:I can definitely thank you that I will not be targeted for an NK tonight though.

Hedgeowl wrote:Welcome Bea!!

Hedgeowl wrote:Linki - Yep, voting record Epi = shittastic

Hedgeowl wrote:

Epignosis wrote:

bea wrote:

Turnip Head wrote:

DFaraday wrote:Effective now, Bea has replaced Summer. Everyone welcome Bea!

Welcome, Bea! I'll miss Summer though, she seemed like a cool player for the little time she was around.

Still no WOG or substitute WOG 0_0

Thanks TH! Nice to see you playing again!!


Can anyone help a sista out? I'll admit - I've been drinking and football and cooking today so my ability to mafia today begins and ends with this post. I have NO idea what's going on. But I'm off tomorrow and can play catch up - anyone that could give me crib notes would be like so so so awesome. It's N5 of a full game. Please help me cull the reading

Hedgeowl is bad. The end.

Epilogue: So was MP, so you can read his posts with that in mind.

Jerk

I am not bad or the SK. I gotta admit you are having a terrible game for lynching civs Epi. First of all, me declaring my intentions in my first posts of looking at top posters (it was the top 10 btw, not 11 since Mongoose was dead) and voting for one, you btw, is not ok apparently. But you declaring you will vote for k4j and then saying you never suspected him is fine. And how is your vote not trying to help "save" MP? You were in the thread with everyone discussing the best way to "save" MP. You even saw 2 of his 4 tells you claimed and you trusted him. TH came up with WOG as a good vote option and explained his reasons and you were the 2nd voter! So, how is it not possible that you could have been trying to save him? Your "case" on me is grasping a lot and you still didnt answer any of my questions.

Pot meet kettle, is the phrase you have used before sir.

I can definitely thank you that I will not be targeted for an NK tonight though.

Welcome Bea!!

Linki - Yep, voting record Epi = shittastic

Epignosis wrote:

Loulou26 wrote:Hedge is bad? Can you tell me why? Is it cos she survived the night kill?

She's bad because you don't read the thread.

Elohcin wrote:He reads the thread And he'd like you to elaborate on you Hedge theory...as would I.

Epignosis wrote:

Hedgeowl wrote:Didnt AP survive a lynch as well? So which role is he? Nice that you left out the roles that block and protect too. I am mostly assuredly not any of these roles, but go ahead and encourage someone to NK me again if you want to test these theories.

"Hey everyone, look over there!"

Hedgeowl wrote: Linki - the bandwagoning begins. Nice job Epi, now K4j and bwt too. 2 of the 3 people I said I suspect. Convenient.

So which is it? Did I vote to save MP because I am Corp or an SK? Or possibly a gullible civ?

Easy, killer. There's no bandwagon. It's not even Daytime.

Anyway, I'll let your posts do the condemning. I don't need to add too much to them:

Hedgeowl wrote:Ok, I don't have much time right now, but I have decided to try a different tactic this game. I will be looking for baddies in the top posters instead of low posters. One if a baddie is lynched we get more info from said lynch than lynching a baddie low poster, and two I think it more likely given some of the players and style that there are baddies running part of this thread. (Three, it slows the thread down a bit getting rid of a few chatty mcchattersons)

The list of top 10 living posters:
Epignosis 119
Mongoose 118
kneel4justice 87
Mister Rearranger 85
S~V~S 85
Loulou26 77
MovingPictures07 61
Summer 59
FZ. 58
Devin the Omniscient 54
Bullzeye 51

One of you is getting my vote later today, but since I am still catching up, might take me a bit more time. Also, given my brief time with the ksiters this seems to be fairly normal for most of them, so gives me pause there as well. I will consider more today as the day progresses, but this is where I am currently thinking since I am not 100% following current in thread accusations without more catch-up.

Hedge, Simon Peter never cast a net that wide. Eleven names. And without bothering with the content of anyone's posts, you go ahead and state that you're voting for one of these people. On Day 3, that ends up being me for- do forgive me- a really lousy reason.

Hedgeowl wrote:I think it very likely that some of the main posters are bad. There are 9 baddies and an SK, so 1/3 of the game wants the 2/3 civs dead, dead, dead. Whether you like math or not that's pretty damn likely the chatty ones have baddies amongst them. Also, since they say the most, they direct the thoughts and feelings of the thread the most, so I am particularly wary currently of having my thoughts influenced by other's posts so much and how they may be influenced.

I don't understand this. Are people incapable of thinking for themselves? Are people so easily manipulated? While I appreciate the compliment (?), I am not Charles Xavier (though I sit about as much as he does). How ironic, then, is your vote for wrathofgod.

Hedgeowl wrote: I really dont think trusting anyone in this game is a good idea and it's interesting how many people are indicating those they trust. Baddies will seem just as helpful as anyone, because they are just as motivated to lynch a baddie from the other team to get some civvie cred. Since others are creating lists I will do my best to contribute as well.

Hedge's list:
TRUST NO ONE

Hedgeowl wrote:I am trying to decide where to go from this last lynch. Obviously, a starting place is voters looking to "save" MP, myself included. Frankly, of the group of TH, Epi, K4j, Hedge, MP, and CBK the only person I was suspicious of was Epi and possibly K4J. The MP lynch illustrates the problem I was trying to get out by targeting top posters perfectly. The longer you spend in thread with someone, the more you can begin to trust them. The more time I spent reading MP's thoughts and his back and forth with K4J the more I trusted both of them. So this leave me in a bit of conundrum. I think of review of all of us and voting histories will be helpful, but honestly I think since MP had so many votes early on that at most one of his teammates voted WOG and the others probably voted other places. He worked very hard in thread to get enough votes on one candidate. So at this point I plan a reread of those folks as a starting place, but dont want to have tunnel vision there either.

You went from trusting no one to trusting MP in a fraction of a Day period.

Hedgeowl wrote:To clarify I will not be voting Epi today, because I also think it sucks to be lynched while insanified and its obviously not faked since our host informed us of the PM.

Why the hell not? You voted me on Day 3. You still suspect me after Day 4. What does being insane have to do with it? Either I'm good or I'm not.

Hedgeowl wrote:My slow reading of MR isnt making me feel better about him. He was really active early in the game and seems to have tapered off. Why is that?

However, as noted this will do nothing to save MP. Seems like Epi, MP (obvi), maybe K4j, and I are interested in not lynching MP currently. Is this correct?

I dont have a read on Sorsha that much, dont really want to vote Lizzy or Bass though.

I think Epi wpuld like to help save MP and then Go the F to Sleep.

I did not vote to save MP. I had not even voted at that point. MP had four votes. I voted for someone who had only one vote at the time. If I wanted to save MP, I would have voted for Lizzy, who had two votes. What I find most interesting is that some people wanted to vote for someone other than MP, but didn't want to vote for Lizzy (like you).

++++

In summary, you have expressed suspicion of me, MR, Sorsha, Boomslang, Dom, S~V~S, Bass the Clever, kneel4justice, and Spacedaisy.

Yet, even with posting more than once that WOG would likely be a civilian, you chose to vote for that individual anyway. Someone with zero posts.

I think Jimmy Buffet once mentioned you in a song. Something about blowing you out by stepping on a pop top.

Epignosis wrote:

Hedgeowl wrote:I am not bad or the SK. I gotta admit you are having a terrible game for lynching civs Epi.

What? I'm having an amazing game for lynching civilians!

Hedgeowl wrote:First of all, me declaring my intentions in my first posts of looking at top posters (it was the top 10 btw, not 11 since Mongoose was dead) and voting for one, you btw, is not ok apparently.

Is it against the rules?

Hedgeowl wrote: But you declaring you will vote for k4j and then saying you never suspected him is fine.

Hedgeowl wrote:And how is your vote not trying to help "save" MP? You were in the thread with everyone discussing the best way to "save" MP. You even saw 2 of his 4 tells you claimed and you trusted him.

For someone so concerned with people manipulating others' thoughts, you seem very comfortable interpreting what's going on in someone else's head.

Yes, I was in the thread with everyone discussion the best way to save MP. Because...you know...there's only ONE thread to participate in. And I hadn't voted yet.

I wasn't trying to save MP. I voted for someone who had ONE vote. ONE. He had four.

I did not trust MP. I wavered and voted someone else I think should go. That's a far cry from wanting to save MP, but not wanting to vote Lizzy and voting someone you think is civilian. There is NO excuse for that. Especially from someone who made a big whoop-ti-do about voting big posters and then voting someone who had zero posts.

Hedgeowl wrote:TH came up with WOG as a good vote option and explained his reasons and you were the 2nd voter! So, how is it not possible that you could have been trying to save him? Your "case" on me is grasping a lot and you still didnt answer any of my questions.

If I wanted to save MP, I would have voted Lizzy. Voting wrathofgod (1 vote) to MP (4 votes) is a piss poor attempt at salvation. If I had voted for someone with zero votes, and a bandwagon came, would you be accusing me of the same bullshit?

Hedgeowl wrote:Pot meet kettle, is the phrase you have used before sir.

I don't understand why you're accusing me of hypocrisy. I never said I was trying to save MP. YOU said that for me and for yourself. I never said WOG was a civilian. YOU said that twice (and voted WOG anyway). I never suspected eleventy players. YOU did.

Hedgeowl wrote:I can definitely thank you that I will not be targeted for an NK tonight though.

Don't be so sure. I can't do it, but I hope someone does.

Hedgeowl wrote:Welcome Bea!!

The only thing I agree with in this post.

Hedgeowl wrote:Linki - Yep, voting record Epi = shittastic

Oh come on Hedge. Tell us how you really feel about my voting record.

Epignosis wrote:

Loulou26 wrote:Hedge is bad? Can you tell me why? Is it cos she survived the night kill?

She's bad because you don't read the thread.

Loulou26 wrote:

Epignosis wrote:

Loulou26 wrote:Hedge is bad? Can you tell me why? Is it cos she survived the night kill?

She's bad because you don't read the thread.

Well was that really necessary? I read the thread, I was asking for YOUR opinion but I guess that would be too much work.

Epignosis wrote:Where the hell did you come from Eloh?

Anyway, I'm not sure why you need me to elaborate if you people read the thread. Was this not enough?

Epignosis wrote:

Hedgeowl wrote:Didnt AP survive a lynch as well? So which role is he? Nice that you left out the roles that block and protect too. I am mostly assuredly not any of these roles, but go ahead and encourage someone to NK me again if you want to test these theories.

"Hey everyone, look over there!"

Hedgeowl wrote: Linki - the bandwagoning begins. Nice job Epi, now K4j and bwt too. 2 of the 3 people I said I suspect. Convenient.

So which is it? Did I vote to save MP because I am Corp or an SK? Or possibly a gullible civ?

Easy, killer. There's no bandwagon. It's not even Daytime.

Anyway, I'll let your posts do the condemning. I don't need to add too much to them:

Hedgeowl wrote:Ok, I don't have much time right now, but I have decided to try a different tactic this game. I will be looking for baddies in the top posters instead of low posters. One if a baddie is lynched we get more info from said lynch than lynching a baddie low poster, and two I think it more likely given some of the players and style that there are baddies running part of this thread. (Three, it slows the thread down a bit getting rid of a few chatty mcchattersons)

The list of top 10 living posters:
Epignosis 119
Mongoose 118
kneel4justice 87
Mister Rearranger 85
S~V~S 85
Loulou26 77
MovingPictures07 61
Summer 59
FZ. 58
Devin the Omniscient 54
Bullzeye 51

One of you is getting my vote later today, but since I am still catching up, might take me a bit more time. Also, given my brief time with the ksiters this seems to be fairly normal for most of them, so gives me pause there as well. I will consider more today as the day progresses, but this is where I am currently thinking since I am not 100% following current in thread accusations without more catch-up.

Hedge, Simon Peter never cast a net that wide. Eleven names. And without bothering with the content of anyone's posts, you go ahead and state that you're voting for one of these people. On Day 3, that ends up being me for- do forgive me- a really lousy reason.

Hedgeowl wrote:I think it very likely that some of the main posters are bad. There are 9 baddies and an SK, so 1/3 of the game wants the 2/3 civs dead, dead, dead. Whether you like math or not that's pretty damn likely the chatty ones have baddies amongst them. Also, since they say the most, they direct the thoughts and feelings of the thread the most, so I am particularly wary currently of having my thoughts influenced by other's posts so much and how they may be influenced.

I don't understand this. Are people incapable of thinking for themselves? Are people so easily manipulated? While I appreciate the compliment (?), I am not Charles Xavier (though I sit about as much as he does). How ironic, then, is your vote for wrathofgod.

Hedgeowl wrote: I really dont think trusting anyone in this game is a good idea and it's interesting how many people are indicating those they trust. Baddies will seem just as helpful as anyone, because they are just as motivated to lynch a baddie from the other team to get some civvie cred. Since others are creating lists I will do my best to contribute as well.

Hedge's list:
TRUST NO ONE

Hedgeowl wrote:I am trying to decide where to go from this last lynch. Obviously, a starting place is voters looking to "save" MP, myself included. Frankly, of the group of TH, Epi, K4j, Hedge, MP, and CBK the only person I was suspicious of was Epi and possibly K4J. The MP lynch illustrates the problem I was trying to get out by targeting top posters perfectly. The longer you spend in thread with someone, the more you can begin to trust them. The more time I spent reading MP's thoughts and his back and forth with K4J the more I trusted both of them. So this leave me in a bit of conundrum. I think of review of all of us and voting histories will be helpful, but honestly I think since MP had so many votes early on that at most one of his teammates voted WOG and the others probably voted other places. He worked very hard in thread to get enough votes on one candidate. So at this point I plan a reread of those folks as a starting place, but dont want to have tunnel vision there either.

You went from trusting no one to trusting MP in a fraction of a Day period.

Hedgeowl wrote:To clarify I will not be voting Epi today, because I also think it sucks to be lynched while insanified and its obviously not faked since our host informed us of the PM.

Why the hell not? You voted me on Day 3. You still suspect me after Day 4. What does being insane have to do with it? Either I'm good or I'm not.

Hedgeowl wrote:My slow reading of MR isnt making me feel better about him. He was really active early in the game and seems to have tapered off. Why is that?

However, as noted this will do nothing to save MP. Seems like Epi, MP (obvi), maybe K4j, and I are interested in not lynching MP currently. Is this correct?

I dont have a read on Sorsha that much, dont really want to vote Lizzy or Bass though.

I think Epi wpuld like to help save MP and then Go the F to Sleep.

I did not vote to save MP. I had not even voted at that point. MP had four votes. I voted for someone who had only one vote at the time. If I wanted to save MP, I would have voted for Lizzy, who had two votes. What I find most interesting is that some people wanted to vote for someone other than MP, but didn't want to vote for Lizzy (like you).

++++

In summary, you have expressed suspicion of me, MR, Sorsha, Boomslang, Dom, S~V~S, Bass the Clever, kneel4justice, and Spacedaisy.

Yet, even with posting more than once that WOG would likely be a civilian, you chose to vote for that individual anyway. Someone with zero posts.

I think Jimmy Buffet once mentioned you in a song. Something about blowing you out by stepping on a pop top.

AND

Epignosis wrote:

Hedgeowl wrote:I am not bad or the SK. I gotta admit you are having a terrible game for lynching civs Epi.

What? I'm having an amazing game for lynching civilians!

Hedgeowl wrote:First of all, me declaring my intentions in my first posts of looking at top posters (it was the top 10 btw, not 11 since Mongoose was dead) and voting for one, you btw, is not ok apparently.

Is it against the rules?

Hedgeowl wrote: But you declaring you will vote for k4j and then saying you never suspected him is fine.

Hedgeowl wrote:And how is your vote not trying to help "save" MP? You were in the thread with everyone discussing the best way to "save" MP. You even saw 2 of his 4 tells you claimed and you trusted him.

For someone so concerned with people manipulating others' thoughts, you seem very comfortable interpreting what's going on in someone else's head.

Yes, I was in the thread with everyone discussion the best way to save MP. Because...you know...there's only ONE thread to participate in. And I hadn't voted yet.

I wasn't trying to save MP. I voted for someone who had ONE vote. ONE. He had four.

I did not trust MP. I wavered and voted someone else I think should go. That's a far cry from wanting to save MP, but not wanting to vote Lizzy and voting someone you think is civilian. There is NO excuse for that. Especially from someone who made a big whoop-ti-do about voting big posters and then voting someone who had zero posts.

Hedgeowl wrote:TH came up with WOG as a good vote option and explained his reasons and you were the 2nd voter! So, how is it not possible that you could have been trying to save him? Your "case" on me is grasping a lot and you still didnt answer any of my questions.

If I wanted to save MP, I would have voted Lizzy. Voting wrathofgod (1 vote) to MP (4 votes) is a piss poor attempt at salvation. If I had voted for someone with zero votes, and a bandwagon came, would you be accusing me of the same bullshit?

Hedgeowl wrote:Pot meet kettle, is the phrase you have used before sir.

I don't understand why you're accusing me of hypocrisy. I never said I was trying to save MP. YOU said that for me and for yourself. I never said WOG was a civilian. YOU said that twice (and voted WOG anyway). I never suspected eleventy players. YOU did.

Hedgeowl wrote:I can definitely thank you that I will not be targeted for an NK tonight though.

Don't be so sure. I can't do it, but I hope someone does.

Hedgeowl wrote:Welcome Bea!!

The only thing I agree with in this post.

Hedgeowl wrote:Linki - Yep, voting record Epi = shittastic

Oh come on Hedge. Tell us how you really feel about my voting record.

S~V~S wrote:Could you explain that again for me, Epi? I seem to have missed it...?

Epignosis wrote:

Loulou26 wrote:

Epignosis wrote:

Loulou26 wrote:Hedge is bad? Can you tell me why? Is it cos she survived the night kill?

She's bad because you don't read the thread.

Well was that really necessary? I read the thread, I was asking for YOUR opinion but I guess that would be too much work.

What the hell? Too much work? I gave my opinion. I actually spent an hour putting that first big post together. And I just reposted my opinion. Would you like me to post it for a third time? I really don't understand what you want.

If you're looking for a summary, you won't get one from me. If you did read the thread, you would know my opinion regarding Hedgeowl quite clearly.

In summary, I don't believe you, Dom or Eloh actually read shit.

Epignosis wrote:
In summary, I don't believe you, Dom or Eloh actually read shit.

Epignosis wrote:Loulou, you said you read the thread. Now you say "I read as much as my time allows me to."

Which is it?

Don't get mad at me because you didn't read what I spent a long time writing. I am not going to make a custom post for anyone who comes in here and only read what their time allowed them to read. There is a link under my name. "In topic." F3. "Hedgeowl." You'll find all you want to know.

If, after that, you want clarifications or additional thoughts, then let me know. I am involved in three games, I have three kids, I am writing a book, and I cook. I can't keep repeating myself just because people can only read what their time allows.

Epignosis wrote:Loulou, you said you read the thread. Now you say "I read as much as my time allows me to."

Which is it?

Don't get mad at me because you didn't read what I spent a long time writing. I am not going to make a custom post for anyone who comes in here and only read what their time allowed them to read. There is a link under my name. "In topic." F3. "Hedgeowl." You'll find all you want to know.

If, after that, you want clarifications or additional thoughts, then let me know. I am involved in three games, I have three kids, I am writing a book, and I cook. I can't keep repeating myself just because people can only read what their time allows.

Elohcin wrote:

Epignosis wrote:Loulou, you said you read the thread. Now you say "I read as much as my time allows me to."

Which is it?

Don't get mad at me because you didn't read what I spent a long time writing. I am not going to make a custom post for anyone who comes in here and only read what their time allowed them to read. There is a link under my name. "In topic." F3. "Hedgeowl." You'll find all you want to know.

If, after that, you want clarifications or additional thoughts, then let me know. I am involved in three games, I have three kids, I am writing a book, and I cook. I can't keep repeating myself just because people can only read what their time allows.

And welcome BEA!

Loulou26 wrote:And I asked that because I did not understand the way things went down. But I have a clearer picture now so its ok. I'll figure it out on my own. I'm not mad, I just don't like snarky comments, I just don't think they're necessary is all.

Epignosis wrote:

Loulou26 wrote:And I asked that because I did not understand the way things went down. But I have a clearer picture now so its ok. I'll figure it out on my own. I'm not mad, I just don't like snarky comments, I just don't think they're necessary is all.

I just don't like putting work into something that gets ignored / overlooked in the hopes of a quick summary. I'm an English teacher. So I hate it more than most.

S~V~S wrote:You should think about the phase. Where you play, posting at night is not allowed. Here it is, but it is still night.

Loulou26 wrote:And I asked that because I did not understand the way things went down. But I have a clearer picture now so its ok. I'll figure it out on my own. I'm not mad, I just don't like snarky comments, I just don't think they're necessary is all.

kneel4justice wrote:

Loulou26 wrote:And I asked that because I did not understand the way things went down. But I have a clearer picture now so its ok. I'll figure it out on my own. I'm not mad, I just don't like snarky comments, I just don't think they're necessary is all.

:P

Loulou26 wrote:

kneel4justice wrote:

Loulou26 wrote:And I asked that because I did not understand the way things went down. But I have a clearer picture now so its ok. I'll figure it out on my own. I'm not mad, I just don't like snarky comments, I just don't think they're necessary is all.

:P

oops

kneel4justice wrote:

S~V~S wrote:You should think about the phase. Where you play, posting at night is not allowed. Here it is, but it is still night.

No offense but I will continue to play my way.
Day 0 and Day 1 I let the negative feedback towards my actions dictate my game and in the end it had no reward as MP (one of my first suspects) was scum. So I will do what I feel is best for me in terms of my personal scumhunting.

Mister Rearranger wrote:@K4J: Right now, if you'd like me to be as spontaneous as I've been so far this game, I'd vote either Devin or Hedge. But I'm not sure why you're interested in my thoughts. I've been dead wrong about 2 players so far (Russ and MP).

S~V~S wrote:

kneel4justice wrote:

S~V~S wrote:You should think about the phase. Where you play, posting at night is not allowed. Here it is, but it is still night.

No offense but I will continue to play my way.
Day 0 and Day 1 I let the negative feedback towards my actions dictate my game and in the end it had no reward as MP (one of my first suspects) was scum. So I will do what I feel is best for me in terms of my personal scumhunting.

No offense taken.

This has nothing to do with negative feedback, and everything to do with trying to draw people out at night when they can be NKed. It's about painting targets on others, not about individual play style. Some of the more old school players here prefer not to talk much at night, or do the pointed question thing, as it is an extreme target drawer while the baddies are setting out night actions. Aggressive questioning at night is, well, I won't say "rude" but not really fair as all will not feel safe or comfortable answering, yet you will possibly call them out for not answering at some point.

it is not about 'personal scumhunting" but about "target painting". Like i said, you don't talk at night at all where you play. Here we do, but we have some etiquette about it, please at least consider advice when people offer it.

S~V~S wrote:

kneel4justice wrote:

S~V~S wrote:You should think about the phase. Where you play, posting at night is not allowed. Here it is, but it is still night.

No offense but I will continue to play my way.
Day 0 and Day 1 I let the negative feedback towards my actions dictate my game and in the end it had no reward as MP (one of my first suspects) was scum. So I will do what I feel is best for me in terms of my personal scumhunting.

No offense taken.

This has nothing to do with negative feedback, and everything to do with trying to draw people out at night when they can be NKed. It's about painting targets on others, not about individual play style. Some of the more old school players here prefer not to talk much at night, or do the pointed question thing, as it is an extreme target drawer while the baddies are setting out night actions. Aggressive questioning at night is, well, I won't say "rude" but not really fair as all will not feel safe or comfortable answering, yet you will possibly call them out for not answering at some point.

it is not about 'personal scumhunting" but about "target painting". Like i said, you don't talk at night at all where you play. Here we do, but we have some etiquette about it, please at least consider advice when people offer it.

Epignosis wrote:Edit: And it's not about etiquette. It's strategy.

Mister Rearranger wrote:Epi, you're not Adam Sandler?

Mind = blown

S~V~S wrote:back in the day, no one sent in their PMs until the very end of the night, and it was considered a baddie move to call people out at night. It was more likely to get the innocent NKed. Perhaps that is why at some forums they do not talk at night at all.

I am old school that way i guess.

S~V~S wrote:Could you explain that again for me, Epi? I seem to have missed it...?

Epignosis wrote:

Mister Rearranger wrote:Epi, you're not Adam Sandler?

Mind = blown

SHUT UP MR. SHOE FACE WHO BUYS A PIE

S~V~S wrote: Plus killing someone with a smile on your face is much more shocking than killing them with a scowl. True story.

S~V~S wrote:

Epignosis wrote:Edit: And it's not about etiquette. It's strategy.

Etiquette is important, too. We are civil people, and being polite is one way of keeping it that way Plus killing someone with a smile on your face is much more shocking than killing them with a scowl. True story.

linki@ K4J~ your style is to not talk at night at all, lol. You have enforced silence at night, so you are not used to it and to the dangers lurking in the dark. I was sincerely trying to offer advice, not be a bitch. Honest

kneel4justice wrote: MR is welcome to respond to my suspicion later if that is what he wants.[/color]

Mister Rearranger wrote:SVS: A civ me is probably the greatest asset any baddie team can have.

kneel4justice wrote: MR is welcome to respond to my suspicion later if that is what he wants.[/color]

I didn't realize it was a suspicion? I did already answer your question though.

kneel4justice wrote:

Mister Rearranger wrote:SVS: A civ me is probably the greatest asset any baddie team can have.

kneel4justice wrote: MR is welcome to respond to my suspicion later if that is what he wants.[/color]

I didn't realize it was a suspicion? I did already answer your question though.

I know, I saw (thank you). I replied with my suspicion which exists because I do not like the majority of your votes this game. I expressed that the majority of the last day phase, maybe you missed it, but yes I am rather suspicious of you.