The Syndicate

speedchuck wrote: ↑Mon Jun 26, 2017 3:12 pm Coordinating is not game-breaking. Sorry Jack.

But I must disagree. Coordinating, even without confirmed results, still provides RESULTS. And that's what we want. We want evolutions to happen. We want Raichus and Venasaur and Charizard and whatever else, I haven't played pokemon.

Rather accurate, all are evolved pokemons.

Though I wouldn't even know if half this list evolved...Gen 1 purist

Sorry about that. Neverwhere is a she and just got confused between evo vote and lynch vote.

Apologies to nutella, but I really don't have much of a read on anyone yet.

speedchuck wrote: ↑Mon Jun 26, 2017 3:12 pm Coordinating is not game-breaking. Sorry Jack.

But I must disagree. Coordinating, even without confirmed results, still provides RESULTS. And that's what we want. We want evolutions to happen. We want Raichus and Venasaur and Charizard and whatever else, I haven't played pokemon.

My daughter's "favorite pokemon" is Ash.

I think neverwhere thought the poll was for the evolution point/she otherwise intended her vote on me to be a positive thing. -linki ok she just cleared this up

@Eloh, not sure if you were alluding to giving an evo point to yourself, but the hosts already confirmed that that is not allowed.


I want to feel good about Timmer, but I kind of agree with DDL in that I didn't like his "I won't vote for people who ask for it" policy. In fact I almost commented on it right after he posted, because I am one of those people who wants evo votes because I think my role will be beneficial. I can see why he'd decide something like that on principle as it's often a quandary that comes up in games when we have similar votes (e.g. the prefects in ROT3K), but I think ultimately it's unproductive as there will certainly be honest civs who ask for it (and those who don't ask/don't seem to care about getting votes may be because their role wouldn't be as important). I can believe that he was coming from a good place, but I don't like that he made it a strict rule for himself right off the bat as it's rather naive and limiting.

I keep sort of forgetting this is a speed game. We only have 4.5 hours left to lynch someone

Oh shit, it is? Lol rip for not reading the sign up thread.

I have opinions on very few players.

Tony, Dom, Mac haven't even posted.

Fredwood wrote: ↑Mon Jun 26, 2017 3:09 pm

Elohcin wrote: ↑Mon Jun 26, 2017 3:08 pm I can see the reasoning behind a Timmer vote. But I'm not ready to vote him quite yet. I must have missed why neverwhere voted for nutella, though.

It was an accident because he wasn't familiar with the format, been a while since he played etc, etc.

Thanks.

Fredwood wrote: ↑Mon Jun 26, 2017 3:24 pm

speedchuck wrote: ↑Mon Jun 26, 2017 3:12 pm Coordinating is not game-breaking. Sorry Jack.

But I must disagree. Coordinating, even without confirmed results, still provides RESULTS. And that's what we want. We want evolutions to happen. We want Raichus and Venasaur and Charizard and whatever else, I haven't played pokemon.

Rather accurate, all are evolved pokemons.

Though I wouldn't even know if half this list evolved...Gen 1 purist

Technically, I've barely played to the first tourney in Pokémon yellow, so I guess I can agree. The heck is a Pichu, right?

speedchuck wrote: ↑Mon Jun 26, 2017 3:51 pm

Fredwood wrote: ↑Mon Jun 26, 2017 3:24 pm

speedchuck wrote: ↑Mon Jun 26, 2017 3:12 pm Coordinating is not game-breaking. Sorry Jack.

But I must disagree. Coordinating, even without confirmed results, still provides RESULTS. And that's what we want. We want evolutions to happen. We want Raichus and Venasaur and Charizard and whatever else, I haven't played pokemon.

Rather accurate, all are evolved pokemons.

Though I wouldn't even know if half this list evolved...Gen 1 purist

Technically, I've barely played to the first tourney in Pokémon yellow, so I guess I can agree. The heck is a Pichu, right?

A mountain in Peru?

Fredwood wrote: ↑Mon Jun 26, 2017 3:53 pm

speedchuck wrote: ↑Mon Jun 26, 2017 3:51 pm

Fredwood wrote: ↑Mon Jun 26, 2017 3:24 pm

speedchuck wrote: ↑Mon Jun 26, 2017 3:12 pm Coordinating is not game-breaking. Sorry Jack.

But I must disagree. Coordinating, even without confirmed results, still provides RESULTS. And that's what we want. We want evolutions to happen. We want Raichus and Venasaur and Charizard and whatever else, I haven't played pokemon.

Rather accurate, all are evolved pokemons.

Though I wouldn't even know if half this list evolved...Gen 1 purist

Technically, I've barely played to the first tourney in Pokémon yellow, so I guess I can agree. The heck is a Pichu, right?

A mountain in Peru?

Ten points for Gryffindor.

For the most part, I either haven't seen you guys in a while or never have played with you. I feel bad voting to lynch basically anyone. Not much regarding reads has happened. Pah.

Could always vote a no poster I guess. I feel the same way cus I missed everyone.

Geez. Ok, I won't vote for speedchuck. Or Dom, because I want him to play.

Edit: I agree with speedchuck. And fred, but not Dom.

I missed lynching you people. It feels good to do it again.

G-Man wrote: ↑Mon Jun 26, 2017 12:36 pm In case this is helpful...

boo- posts
DFaraday- posts
Dragon D. Luffy- posts
Dyslexicon- posts
Dom- posts
DrWilgy- posts
Elohcin- posts
Fredwood- posts
G-Man- posts
Jackofhearts2005- posts
Long Con- posts
MacDougall- posts
Neverwhere- posts
nutella- posts
speedchuck- posts
sprityo- posts
timmer- posts
Tink- posts
TonyStarkPrime- posts

Thanks, G-Man!

boo wrote: ↑Sun Jun 25, 2017 12:05 am Seems to me openly saying who you vote to evolve is a bad plan. Team rocket can just stack their votes on each other while all three are alive.

@hosts: you can't vote for the same person to evolve in back to back nights, right? Id assume that's a double targeting. Will it be posted in thread when an evolve happens?

This gave me a slight suspicion of you, boo, so I'll vote for you now. Vote boo

yeah that's pingy for the same reason I got pinged by G.

@Fred/LC

Can you explain why that is pingy?

Jackofhearts2005 wrote: ↑Mon Jun 26, 2017 9:42 amCause you told me you didn't want points.

No?

nutella wrote: ↑Mon Jun 26, 2017 3:29 pm I keep sort of forgetting this is a speed game. We only have 4.5 hours left to lynch someone

Whaaaaat?

I assumed phases was about 2 full days as normal.

In that case, let's just lynch Jack and be done with it.^^

Haven't caught up, and I HAVE TO see Twin Peaks now lol. But really, bf-time and all that.

But I'll catch up before day end. Lurkers can die.

Long Con wrote: ↑Mon Jun 26, 2017 4:13 pm

G-Man wrote: ↑Mon Jun 26, 2017 12:36 pm In case this is helpful...

boo- posts
DFaraday- posts
Dragon D. Luffy- posts
Dyslexicon- posts
Dom- posts
DrWilgy- posts
Elohcin- posts
Fredwood- posts
G-Man- posts
Jackofhearts2005- posts
Long Con- posts
MacDougall- posts
Neverwhere- posts
nutella- posts
speedchuck- posts
sprityo- posts
timmer- posts
Tink- posts
TonyStarkPrime- posts

Thanks, G-Man!

boo wrote: ↑Sun Jun 25, 2017 12:05 am Seems to me openly saying who you vote to evolve is a bad plan. Team rocket can just stack their votes on each other while all three are alive.

@hosts: you can't vote for the same person to evolve in back to back nights, right? Id assume that's a double targeting. Will it be posted in thread when an evolve happens?

This gave me a slight suspicion of you, boo, so I'll vote for you now. Vote boo

Because?

I won't be able to post again before the poll ends, so I have to vote now. I don't have any actual suspicions, so I randomized between the noposters and got Tony Stark.

I think voting for people who didn't even post is a waste. They are likely to get replaced eventually. We learn next to nothing from those lynches.

Dyslexicon wrote: ↑Mon Jun 26, 2017 4:40 pm

Jackofhearts2005 wrote: ↑Mon Jun 26, 2017 9:42 amCause you told me you didn't want points.

No?

What you actually said was "I prefer VT roles" but then (and I forgot this bit) you went on like "but plz vote for me."

My bad.

Also I was feeling Boo was town when he posted that. I think mafia wouldn't want to be the first one to barge into a civ consensus and disagree with it.

Dragon D. Luffy wrote: ↑Mon Jun 26, 2017 5:04 pm I think voting for people who didn't even post is a waste. They are likely to get replaced eventually. We learn next to nothing from those lynches.

I kinda disagree.

Mass Effect was partially determined by some weak replacement of townies.

I had a hell of a hard time finding mafia in the last Hybridity game as two of the four mafia members replaced out and basically got to skate for ~4 phases.

With 24 hour phases, is a prompt replacement realistic?

Who's lynch so you think we'd learn the most from at this point? Already knowing my alignment and having not tied any two other players together, a silent lynch tells me roughly the same thing as any other, that is "the alignment of a player."

Of course, there's stuff yet to be learned in the actual choosing of a specific player.

I will say that Tony has been active in HCRealms games, lately, and shouldn't need a replacement.

Jackofhearts2005 wrote: ↑Mon Jun 26, 2017 4:27 pm @Fred/LC

Can you explain why that is pingy?

I touched on it in my first wall when talking about G-MAN

The benefit of town vote on town is greater then the benefit of a Town vote on mafia. Mafia can level no matter what, so having even a partial record for who pointed someone can be very useful as white noise for who you do vote for, giving some kind of idea who is evolved, and a starting point for investigation.

Just because something MAY help mafia to give targeting priority is not a reason to withhold information from the town, even if it's as simple as Speed saying he gave a point to LC. Just seems counter productive to dwell on the negatives when the evolution mechanic benefits the town more then it does Mafia to a ridiculous degree.

Jackofhearts2005 wrote: ↑Mon Jun 26, 2017 5:09 pm

Dragon D. Luffy wrote: ↑Mon Jun 26, 2017 5:04 pm I think voting for people who didn't even post is a waste. They are likely to get replaced eventually. We learn next to nothing from those lynches.

I kinda disagree.

Mass Effect was partially determined by some weak replacement of townies.

I had a hell of a hard time finding mafia in the last Hybridity game as two of the four mafia members replaced out and basically got to skate for ~4 phases.

With 24 hour phases, is a prompt replacement realistic?

Who's lynch so you think we'd learn the most from at this point? Already knowing my alignment and having not tied any two other players together, a silent lynch tells me roughly the same thing as any other, that is "the alignment of a player."

Of course, there's stuff yet to be learned in the actual choosing of a specific player.

+1. Phenom as well. I think DDL isn't making a distinction between pairing the inactives and getting information.

An inactive lynch is perfectly acceptable, from even just watching champs and the few other places I've played, if you don't really learn a lot from other lynches. If all your choices are low info lynches, lynch the inactive.

DDL if you want us to lynch an non inactive, tell me which lynch you think nets us the most information?

Should read if you don't want to lynch a no-poster, where do you want to go, and why will it give us more info then a no poster at this point in the game?

Well in my forum when the host can't find a replacement they just kill the player.

I reckon this might not happen here.

3 replacements isn't too hard to find though. It is done eventually.

Fredwood wrote: ↑Mon Jun 26, 2017 5:20 pm

Jackofhearts2005 wrote: ↑Mon Jun 26, 2017 5:09 pm

Dragon D. Luffy wrote: ↑Mon Jun 26, 2017 5:04 pm I think voting for people who didn't even post is a waste. They are likely to get replaced eventually. We learn next to nothing from those lynches.

I kinda disagree.

Mass Effect was partially determined by some weak replacement of townies.

I had a hell of a hard time finding mafia in the last Hybridity game as two of the four mafia members replaced out and basically got to skate for ~4 phases.

With 24 hour phases, is a prompt replacement realistic?

Who's lynch so you think we'd learn the most from at this point? Already knowing my alignment and having not tied any two other players together, a silent lynch tells me roughly the same thing as any other, that is "the alignment of a player."

Of course, there's stuff yet to be learned in the actual choosing of a specific player.

+1. Phenom as well. I think DDL isn't making a distinction between pairing the inactives and getting information.

An inactive lynch is perfectly acceptable, from even just watching champs and the few other places I've played, if you don't really learn a lot from other lynches. If all your choices are low info lynches, lynch the inactive.

DDL if you want us to lynch an non inactive, tell me which lynch you think nets us the most information?

Anybody who is actually posting so the interactions between them and other players actually give us clues.

@all if you had to lynch DDL or JoH which one?

@all if you had to lynch TSP, Dom or Mac which one?

DDL, is JoH on your team?

I am completely adrift, here. I have zero suspicions. I missed a vote earlier. I'll try to get my hea din the game soon.

I voted for Dom, no great reason. Not very useful but I didn't want to miss the vote.

I voted for Tony because he isn't saying anything. I'm not really playing to win. I'm playing to have fun.

timmer wrote: ↑Mon Jun 26, 2017 6:03 pm I voted for Dom, no great reason. Not very useful but I didn't want to miss the vote.

Remember when you were bad and randy voted? Wilgy remembers

I've got a case of the Mondays. Digging out from a three-day week last week and a few surprises kept me from re-reading in full. I've been trying to follow along this afternoon as best I could. Seems like a pretty standard Day 1 to me.

DrWilgy wrote: ↑Mon Jun 26, 2017 5:54 pm @all if you had to lynch DDL or JoH which one?

@all if you had to lynch TSP, Dom or Mac which one?

DDL, is JoH on your team?

DDL.

Mac. I can tell when Tony and Dom are good sometimes. I've seen good Mac only and it didn't look like standard good to me.

DrWilgy wrote: ↑Mon Jun 26, 2017 6:09 pm

timmer wrote: ↑Mon Jun 26, 2017 6:03 pm I voted for Dom, no great reason. Not very useful but I didn't want to miss the vote.

Remember when you were bad and randy voted? Wilgy remembers

DrWilgy wrote: ↑Mon Jun 26, 2017 5:54 pm @all if you had to lynch DDL or JoH which one?

@all if you had to lynch TSP, Dom or Mac which one?

DDL, is JoH on your team?

What a weird question. Trying to make me scumslip or smh?

I don't know.

Tink wrote: ↑Mon Jun 26, 2017 6:07 pm I voted for Tony because he isn't saying anything. I'm not really playing to win. I'm playing to have fun.

I like your reason for voting Tony. But I'm confused on why you don't want to win. Please tell me why?

I'm voting Tony for tge same reason.

Id go with Dom because Ive scumread Mac right once and could do it again, while I dont know the other guy and would like to get to.

I'm voting Jack for literally no reason. Sue me.

I'm voting LC for what amounts to a drive-by, since he hasn't been back to answer, and pulled something up i had said that he had had plenty of time to address before he cast his vote, and had not.

Voted Mac.


Tony was online today on the Realms. Also, I refuse to screw over Dom a 4th time in our 5 games together. Got enough people who never trust me as is.

Day 1 votes are the most WIFOMy lynches ever usually takes like 3 votes anyway. On top of that no posters probably haven't evolved or won't evolve.

So even if they're town, not only will they screw up EOD, we're gonna spend most of the game underpowered.

Also, DDL, your answer avoided the question. I said who, not theoretically who. Who do you wish to lynch, Boo Wilgy, Jack, or LC, and what do you think theIR flip will tell you in day 2?

Or what does a Timmer lynch flip tell you?