Re: Twin Peaks Mafia {NIGHT 1}
Posted: Sat Apr 20, 2013 2:39 pm
One move minimum.Nevinera wrote:At one move per night? Nobody would hae gotten past the opening.Kate wrote: He would have killed off players chess game after chess game.
Murder, Mayhem, and Mafia
https://www.mafiathesyndicate.com/
One move minimum.Nevinera wrote:At one move per night? Nobody would hae gotten past the opening.Kate wrote: He would have killed off players chess game after chess game.
I think what he's saying is that if anyone had been captured, they probably would have only made one move per night because of self-preservation.Vompatti wrote:One move minimum.Nevinera wrote:At one move per night? Nobody would hae gotten past the opening.Kate wrote: He would have killed off players chess game after chess game.
I dunno, I think I probably would have tried to win.birdwithteeth11 wrote:I think what he's saying is that if anyone had been captured, they probably would have only made one move per night because of self-preservation.Vompatti wrote:One move minimum.Nevinera wrote:At one move per night? Nobody would hae gotten past the opening.Kate wrote: He would have killed off players chess game after chess game.
I think anyone would want to win. But I would be afraid that he could manipulate the chess game in some way.Vompatti wrote:I dunno, I think I probably would have tried to win.birdwithteeth11 wrote:I think what he's saying is that if anyone had been captured, they probably would have only made one move per night because of self-preservation.Vompatti wrote:One move minimum.Nevinera wrote:At one move per night? Nobody would hae gotten past the opening.Kate wrote: He would have killed off players chess game after chess game.
If it was possible you are probably right. Windom on the show was the big bad (other than bob). No if ands or buts. I don't see anything bad about him being gone.blindfaeth wrote:I still think it was a terrible plan, regardless that it came back in "our favor" - though knowing my boyfriend, and having taught him as best I could before he started playing mafia with us all, I'm convinced he would side with the civvies as an indy if at all possible, just like I would. I hate when I'm lynched as an indy and people rejoice when I was trying to help them
In any case, yay no NK and it could have been a worse result, but I would really frown on using this method again.
Yep. Voting LogLady.Kate wrote:The log lady is a good choice. I think I remember that the log knew who killed Laura or something like that. The log lady definitely played a pivotal role in getting cooper to realize what his dreams meant which helped him to solve the mystery.
Quite often your friends will see you in a better light, even if they know your dark side. They are also protective of you, and may see things from other people you do not, or that you may even ignore becasue you don't want to believe it.Kate wrote:Donnas not a bad choice either, she knows a lot about Laura just not enough of the darker side of Laura.
I'm wasn't trying to argue with you about it but Donna was actually shown to know very little about the real Laura. Now that you made me think more about Donna I'd go with Ben or james before I'd pick Donna.S~V~S wrote:Quite often your friends will see you in a better light, even if they know your dark side. They are also protective of you, and may see things from other people you do not, or that you may even ignore becasue you don't want to believe it.Kate wrote:Donnas not a bad choice either, she knows a lot about Laura just not enough of the darker side of Laura.
So even if she is not well acquainted with Lauras dark side, I still think she is a good person to talk to, having already spoken to leland.
Unless there is a stick out suspect, pretty much the same. Or at least spread as much as possible. Maybe leave one or two spots clear. If there is a night kill we then no where to look.S~V~S wrote:And I wasn't trying to argue either~ I just think thatin most games, wetry to write our own story, and knowledge of knowing the original is not as important.
I was just trying to branch out a bit, start some discussion.
What do you think we should do for the nextlynch?
Really? I don't know, I thought Nevinera seemed a bit odd a few times and BF's behavior also pinged me on occasion, but both were nothing extraordinary. I'm not sure about anyone else. Snow Dog seems rather civvie to me and so do S~V~S and Kate, but I suppose either of them could already be recruited or may be in the future. As to everyone else, not sure either way there. But again, I haven't done a re-read or anything.Russtifinko wrote:Kate has a good point on the Log Lady, I think. She seems pretty crazy and hard to understand so far, but if she really knows who the murderer is maybe she'll give us some sort of clue, at least. Hopefully we catch her at a more or less clear moment.
Linki with MP: I think spreading the votes a fair bit is a good idea. If we leave for example 2-4 players free of votes and there is a night kill, then we'll have a pretty darn short list of suspects. Unfortunately, as to who we should lynch I haven't the slightest yet. We got absolutely no useful info from the vote yesterday, and so far no one has really pinged me at all in the thread, even after a reread.
That's the problem. Anyone can be recruited. So any civ feelings about anyone must be revalued constantly. (After even nights)MovingPictures07 wrote:Really? I don't know, I thought Nevinera seemed a bit odd a few times and BF's behavior also pinged me on occasion, but both were nothing extraordinary. I'm not sure about anyone else. Snow Dog seems rather civvie to me and so do S~V~S and Kate, but I suppose either of them could already be recruited or may be in the future. As to everyone else, not sure either way there. But again, I haven't done a re-read or anything.Russtifinko wrote:Kate has a good point on the Log Lady, I think. She seems pretty crazy and hard to understand so far, but if she really knows who the murderer is maybe she'll give us some sort of clue, at least. Hopefully we catch her at a more or less clear moment.
Linki with MP: I think spreading the votes a fair bit is a good idea. If we leave for example 2-4 players free of votes and there is a night kill, then we'll have a pretty darn short list of suspects. Unfortunately, as to who we should lynch I haven't the slightest yet. We got absolutely no useful info from the vote yesterday, and so far no one has really pinged me at all in the thread, even after a reread.
I think bf seems more aggravated than anything. Nev though, I completely agree.MovingPictures07 wrote:Agreed on Log Lady so I'm voting there.
RIP/BIH Boogs? I agree it seems like a good result though based on the role.
I would NOT like to use the same method tomorrow, despite being the one to bring it up (as Rox nearly wanted to chop my head off for, due to a misunderstanding, lol, thankfully that is no longer the case). I think there is definitely more to be gleaned from the thread now in terms of suspicion and I think we need to try and figure out who Bob and his minion might be. There were a few people in particular who caught my eye, notably Nevinera and BF, but I'm not sure I'd vote either of them at this moment. I need to re-read the thread, but very doubtful I will have time for that, as I have had a very busy weekend and it should also be a busy week. I'll try and keep up at all times.
Now as to whether we should try to have a normal lynch as in any other game and then attempt to gain information about Bob or his minion thereafter or whether we try a modified version of what we did today to narrow down a few agreed-upon possible suspects as a killer, that's up in the air. I want to hear what others think.
Ah. As I only read his posts I didn't read that.Kate wrote:He flat out ignored everything that was said between me and svs about leaving him without a vote for one.
As everyone got at least one vote in the last lynch how can there be an NK?Kate wrote:If there is a nk tonight at least we can be pretty sure it was whoever has the Ben Horne role.
That is not how I understand his "power". As I understand it, if he had used it, that person would have voted the way he wanted at the time.Kate wrote:Because Ben if recruited could manipulate the vote off of him and onto someone else then kill without any of us knowing it.
Oh I hope you are. Right. I thought that too until inh posted that Ben could change a vote and changed my understanding of the role.Snow Dog wrote:That is not how I understand his "power". As I understand it, if he had used it, that person would have voted the way he wanted at the time.Kate wrote:Because Ben if recruited could manipulate the vote off of him and onto someone else then kill without any of us knowing it.
See read this...insertnamehere wrote:Remember, Ben Horne can change one vote. He could change the vote for himself to whoever he chooses.
Just food for thought.
Oh yes. You are right then.Kate wrote:See read this...insertnamehere wrote:Remember, Ben Horne can change one vote. He could change the vote for himself to whoever he chooses.
Just food for thought.
Not boogs either as it won't make sense.Kate wrote:Boogs not home, stupid autocorrect
I almost chimed in on the topic - I would prefer to have him vote for me instead of leaving me uncovered. I wanted someone to vote for me because if I wasn't voted for, and Ben happened to have been recruited, it would look like *I* killed someone. It wasn't a huge probability though, so I decided to not try to persuade SVS to provide me with an alibi (since that would deprive him of an alibi instead, and it sounded like he was leaning toward voting for me anyway). I certainly don't see how my lack of interaction on the topic could imply anything about my orientation.. -.O Would you mind clarifying your logic there for me?Kate wrote:He flat out ignored everything that was said between me and svs about leaving him without a vote for one.