Re: Hogwarts Mafia - Day 1
Posted: Sun Oct 28, 2018 10:08 pm
I am not following this, help a brother out.speedchuck wrote: ↑Sun Oct 28, 2018 9:37 pmIf you want to hold up the name of Ravenclaw, you ought to read the rules.
I am not following this, help a brother out.speedchuck wrote: ↑Sun Oct 28, 2018 9:37 pmIf you want to hold up the name of Ravenclaw, you ought to read the rules.
This seems like a question better directed toward the host than the game at large, which gives me the impression you didn't ask it because you care about the answer.Long Con wrote: ↑Sun Oct 28, 2018 10:01 pm This Glorf talk reminds me of the presence of Veritaserum. This game has lie detection - can we lie-detect any post successfully, or are there restrictions? Some games have a rule that you can't LD answers to direct questions, to avoid everyone lining up and saying "I am a Civilian" as an automatic checkable phrase. Also, what happens when Glorf is given Veritaserum? Super-honesty?
This whole discussion is primo levels of silly.Epignosis wrote: ↑Sun Oct 28, 2018 10:06 pmI didn't have a "dig" at juliets.JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Sun Oct 28, 2018 10:02 pmI answered this already in response to juliets, you'll see it soon enough.Epignosis wrote: ↑Sun Oct 28, 2018 10:00 pmWhat was my dig at juliets?JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Sun Oct 28, 2018 9:10 pm I'm going to have essentially zero time until Tuesday night or Wednesday. While I'm not here y'all best find excuses to do work and not excuses to do fuck all. Epi's recent grumbles are valid.
[VOTE: Quin] aubergine, because he said some shit I didn't like earlier. He provided a token response to Epi's dig at juliets which just looked like "this is where I am supposed to interject with this here comment" instead of "this is a problem and I want to address it".
My comment was that we are not mafia partners because I like to discuss things with my mafia teammates, and I "spoiled" something for juliets (even though I PUT THE DAMN THING IN SPOILER TAGS), so we are not bad together in BTSC.
You don't have to believe that, of course, but I threw it out there anyway.
Hey all! Just want to point out that I find it difficult to believe that juliets was confused by this post. Like, even I can remember that people say shit like this on day 1. Thank you.
The part you've just played in it has been the least meaningful.
Meow.JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Sun Oct 28, 2018 10:10 pmThe part you've just played in it has been the least meaningful.
All you're doing is asking juliets for a read on Epi. It's no more "token" than my bull, 3J.JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Sun Oct 28, 2018 4:58 pm juliets, Epi says you’re not on his team. Whaddya say to that?
This logic seems unsound. Do you mean that you pre-discuss everything you say in the thread with your teammates when you're bad?
I was asking juliets to respond in some capacity to what I interpreted to be an accusation. You ponderfaced Epignosis as if he'd said something suspicious. What was the point of your post?Quin wrote: ↑Sun Oct 28, 2018 10:14 pmAll you're doing is asking juliets for a read on Epi. It's no more "token" than my bull, 3J.JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Sun Oct 28, 2018 4:58 pm juliets, Epi says you’re not on his team. Whaddya say to that?
I don't suspect him for it. I think he saw something in it, and went after it. I think that's a good mark for him, even if he was erroneous.JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Sun Oct 28, 2018 10:08 pmOh.Epignosis wrote: ↑Sun Oct 28, 2018 10:06 pm I didn't have a "dig" at juliets.
My comment was that we are not mafia partners because I like to discuss things with my mafia teammates, and I "spoiled" something for juliets (even though I PUT THE DAMN THING IN SPOILER TAGS), so we are not bad together in BTSC.
You don't have to believe that, of course, but I threw it out there anyway.
What do you think of Quin's response?
It's a legal requirement in mafia for someone to respond in kind when a player mentions not being somebody's teammate.JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Sun Oct 28, 2018 10:18 pmI was asking juliets to respond in some capacity to what I interpreted to be an accusation. You ponderfaced Epignosis as if he'd said something suspicious. What was the point of your post?Quin wrote: ↑Sun Oct 28, 2018 10:14 pmAll you're doing is asking juliets for a read on Epi. It's no more "token" than my bull, 3J.JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Sun Oct 28, 2018 4:58 pm juliets, Epi says you’re not on his team. Whaddya say to that?
You think too much of me.Epignosis wrote: ↑Sun Oct 28, 2018 10:18 pmI don't suspect him for it. I think he saw something in it, and went after it. I think that's a good mark for him, even if he was erroneous.JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Sun Oct 28, 2018 10:08 pmOh.Epignosis wrote: ↑Sun Oct 28, 2018 10:06 pm I didn't have a "dig" at juliets.
My comment was that we are not mafia partners because I like to discuss things with my mafia teammates, and I "spoiled" something for juliets (even though I PUT THE DAMN THING IN SPOILER TAGS), so we are not bad together in BTSC.
You don't have to believe that, of course, but I threw it out there anyway.
What do you think of Quin's response?
There isn't any logic to it. I've been bad with juliets before, and juliets loves chat (see: discord). We would have been talking this stuff up, and juliets asks questions about things even when bad.
Cheeky way to best Veritiserum or Epi being Epi?Epignosis wrote: ↑Sun Oct 28, 2018 10:21 pmThere isn't any logic to it. I've been bad with juliets before, and juliets loves chat (see: discord). We would have been talking this stuff up, and juliets asks questions about things even when bad.
So my point is this:
juliets and I are not bad teammates together.
Use that. Work with it. Bye.
It probably is a dumb premise. Do you read any of the players involved any particular way as a result of that dumb premise?DharmaHelper wrote: ↑Sun Oct 28, 2018 10:20 pm Seems like a dumb premise to me is all.
Like, am I supposed to believe that remark/spoiler was meant specifically for Juliets? Or that if you were bad with Juliets the first thing you talk about in BTSC is "Hey I haven't read all the books please don't spoil this specific thing for me" or w/e?
I dunno. Seems like a dumb hill to die on.
Not currently. I'm not particularly interested in digging into it and trying to squeeze the rock, so to speak. No juice there. Not worth my brain power. Moving on.JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Sun Oct 28, 2018 10:22 pmIt probably is a dumb premise. Do you read any of the players involved any particular way as a result of that dumb premise?DharmaHelper wrote: ↑Sun Oct 28, 2018 10:20 pm Seems like a dumb premise to me is all.
Like, am I supposed to believe that remark/spoiler was meant specifically for Juliets? Or that if you were bad with Juliets the first thing you talk about in BTSC is "Hey I haven't read all the books please don't spoil this specific thing for me" or w/e?
I dunno. Seems like a dumb hill to die on.
I don't hate it.JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Sun Oct 28, 2018 10:24 pmQuin and I are not teammates, because I've busted his balls. You don't have to believe that of course, but if it's true how will you use that information to progress your hunt under the present game conditions?
Understandable. Your next challenge is to create a rock more worth squeezing.DharmaHelper wrote: ↑Sun Oct 28, 2018 10:23 pm Not currently. I'm not particularly interested in digging into it and trying to squeeze the rock, so to speak. No juice there. Not worth my brain power. Moving on.
It's relatively late, my sleep schedule is fucked, and I win games when I troll you and refuse to add anything of value to discussion.JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Sun Oct 28, 2018 10:26 pmUnderstandable. Your next challenge is to create a rock more worth squeezing.DharmaHelper wrote: ↑Sun Oct 28, 2018 10:23 pm Not currently. I'm not particularly interested in digging into it and trying to squeeze the rock, so to speak. No juice there. Not worth my brain power. Moving on.
juliets = / = timmertimmer wrote: ↑Sun Oct 28, 2018 10:10 pmHey all! Just want to point out that I find it difficult to believe that juliets was confused by this post. Like, even I can remember that people say shit like this on day 1. Thank you.
You're filler.DharmaHelper wrote: ↑Sun Oct 28, 2018 10:32 pm*puts on sherlock holmes hat*
Is that because we're all posting on this page of the thread
I'm filler on your list or do you mean "your filler"Epignosis wrote: ↑Sun Oct 28, 2018 10:35 pmYou're filler.DharmaHelper wrote: ↑Sun Oct 28, 2018 10:32 pm*puts on sherlock holmes hat*
Is that because we're all posting on this page of the thread
Geez. Okay. Sorry I asked.Epignosis wrote: ↑Sun Oct 28, 2018 10:21 pmThere isn't any logic to it. I've been bad with juliets before, and juliets loves chat (see: discord). We would have been talking this stuff up, and juliets asks questions about things even when bad.
So my point is this:
juliets and I are not bad teammates together.
Use that. Work with it. Bye.
I wasn't aiming to be rude. I thought all the cool kids said "Bye" at the end of their posts, indicating they had summed up their points.Long Con wrote: ↑Sun Oct 28, 2018 10:47 pmGeez. Okay. Sorry I asked.Epignosis wrote: ↑Sun Oct 28, 2018 10:21 pmThere isn't any logic to it. I've been bad with juliets before, and juliets loves chat (see: discord). We would have been talking this stuff up, and juliets asks questions about things even when bad.
So my point is this:
juliets and I are not bad teammates together.
Use that. Work with it. Bye.
Hi, it's good to play with you again, though I'm still suspicious of you.DharmaHelper wrote: ↑Sun Oct 28, 2018 10:28 pm
It's relatively late, my sleep schedule is fucked, and I win games when I troll you and refuse to add anything of value to discussion.
2/3 of those things means I'll dig my heels in and do some rock-squeezing tomorrow.
"Still?"Owner of a Lonely Heart wrote: ↑Sun Oct 28, 2018 10:52 pmHi, it's good to play with you again, though I'm still suspicious of you.DharmaHelper wrote: ↑Sun Oct 28, 2018 10:28 pm
It's relatively late, my sleep schedule is fucked, and I win games when I troll you and refuse to add anything of value to discussion.
2/3 of those things means I'll dig my heels in and do some rock-squeezing tomorrow.
[VOTE: DharmaHelper] aubergine
In the Firefly game we played together, I was suspicious of him the whole game. I just couldn't bring myself to trust him sadly. We were actually on the same side though. Rip.Epignosis wrote: ↑Sun Oct 28, 2018 10:54 pm"Still?"Owner of a Lonely Heart wrote: ↑Sun Oct 28, 2018 10:52 pmHi, it's good to play with you again, though I'm still suspicious of you.DharmaHelper wrote: ↑Sun Oct 28, 2018 10:28 pm
It's relatively late, my sleep schedule is fucked, and I win games when I troll you and refuse to add anything of value to discussion.
2/3 of those things means I'll dig my heels in and do some rock-squeezing tomorrow.
[VOTE: DharmaHelper] aubergine
Cool.Owner of a Lonely Heart wrote: ↑Sun Oct 28, 2018 10:52 pmHi, it's good to play with you again, though I'm still suspicious of you.DharmaHelper wrote: ↑Sun Oct 28, 2018 10:28 pm
It's relatively late, my sleep schedule is fucked, and I win games when I troll you and refuse to add anything of value to discussion.
2/3 of those things means I'll dig my heels in and do some rock-squeezing tomorrow.
[VOTE: DharmaHelper] aubergine
I think his treatment of Quin is fishy.
I thought you were done for the day. What changed your mind?
So you are voting DH because he was a civilian in the a completely different game and you suspected him there?Owner of a Lonely Heart wrote: ↑Sun Oct 28, 2018 10:57 pmIn the Firefly game we played together, I was suspicious of him the whole game. I just couldn't bring myself to trust him sadly. We were actually on the same side though. Rip.Epignosis wrote: ↑Sun Oct 28, 2018 10:54 pm"Still?"Owner of a Lonely Heart wrote: ↑Sun Oct 28, 2018 10:52 pmHi, it's good to play with you again, though I'm still suspicious of you.DharmaHelper wrote: ↑Sun Oct 28, 2018 10:28 pm
It's relatively late, my sleep schedule is fucked, and I win games when I troll you and refuse to add anything of value to discussion.
2/3 of those things means I'll dig my heels in and do some rock-squeezing tomorrow.
[VOTE: DharmaHelper] aubergine
I didn't say I was done for the day, I said I'm tired and I don't think I'd be able to dig into the thread productively.Owner of a Lonely Heart wrote: ↑Sun Oct 28, 2018 11:01 pmI thought you were done for the day. What changed your mind?
Are you reading the thread or not?