The Syndicate

Creature wrote: ↑Mon May 31, 2021 4:22 pm Guess I missed a lot of the discussion

falcon45ca wrote: ↑Mon May 31, 2021 4:21 pm

Wiml wrote: ↑Mon May 31, 2021 4:09 pm

MissSparkles wrote: ↑Mon May 31, 2021 4:01 pm

Wiml wrote: ↑Mon May 31, 2021 3:48 pm

cat wrote: ↑Mon May 31, 2021 11:48 am

Creature wrote: ↑Mon May 31, 2021 10:14 am I wonder how we'll find the traitors

Do you think the traitors will try to contact eachother? Should we look for softs?

I'm reading this and the thing that actually stands out to me is actually something different to what was brought up.

I'll explain it better in a moment but coming into the thread with an immediate focus on potential partners is wolfy and it's part of the mindset I woukd expect from a lost wolf in this scenario.

Didn’t I say just that? Maybe I worded it poorly?

My reading comprehension is sometimes hit or miss lol.

I interpreted that you were saying it was wolfy because you interpreted it as it being something like a purposeful mention by cat to either soft lost wolf or to nudge other lost wolves into trying to communicate and/or being wary of getting spotted (even if they didn't realise it was a post from a lost wolf).

What I'm trying to say here is that I think the post is wolfy but for a slightly different reason actually looking at it again. I think a lost wolf comes into the thread with thoughts about teammates on their mind (communicating with / finding / etc) and I think that it's >rand likely for a lost wolf to unconsciously bring up the topic of communication between lost wolves in this way because it's something already on their mind coming into the thread (and therefore making them more likely to mention it). So a small TMI slip pretty much as opposed to a purposeful soft.

That's the difference I was trying to suggest, at least.

This looks like backpedalling to me dude

falcon45ca wrote: ↑Mon May 31, 2021 4:23 pm

Creature wrote: ↑Mon May 31, 2021 4:22 pm Guess I missed a lot of the discussion

Fortunately it's written down, so you can catch up if ya like

Creature wrote: ↑Mon May 31, 2021 4:22 pm How you all doing?

Wiml wrote: ↑Mon May 31, 2021 4:24 pm

Creature wrote: ↑Mon May 31, 2021 4:22 pm How you all doing?

Not bad thanks! How about you?

Wiml wrote: ↑Mon May 31, 2021 4:24 pm

falcon45ca wrote: ↑Mon May 31, 2021 4:21 pm

Wiml wrote: ↑Mon May 31, 2021 4:09 pm

MissSparkles wrote: ↑Mon May 31, 2021 4:01 pm

Wiml wrote: ↑Mon May 31, 2021 3:48 pm

cat wrote: ↑Mon May 31, 2021 11:48 am

Creature wrote: ↑Mon May 31, 2021 10:14 am I wonder how we'll find the traitors

Do you think the traitors will try to contact eachother? Should we look for softs?

I'm reading this and the thing that actually stands out to me is actually something different to what was brought up.

I'll explain it better in a moment but coming into the thread with an immediate focus on potential partners is wolfy and it's part of the mindset I woukd expect from a lost wolf in this scenario.

Didn’t I say just that? Maybe I worded it poorly?

My reading comprehension is sometimes hit or miss lol.

I interpreted that you were saying it was wolfy because you interpreted it as it being something like a purposeful mention by cat to either soft lost wolf or to nudge other lost wolves into trying to communicate and/or being wary of getting spotted (even if they didn't realise it was a post from a lost wolf).

What I'm trying to say here is that I think the post is wolfy but for a slightly different reason actually looking at it again. I think a lost wolf comes into the thread with thoughts about teammates on their mind (communicating with / finding / etc) and I think that it's >rand likely for a lost wolf to unconsciously bring up the topic of communication between lost wolves in this way because it's something already on their mind coming into the thread (and therefore making them more likely to mention it). So a small TMI slip pretty much as opposed to a purposeful soft.

That's the difference I was trying to suggest, at least.

This looks like backpedalling to me dude

I explained what Sparkles was saying and I explained my different interpretation of the post to her.

That's not back pedalling. I came out of that post saying the same thing I had said just above but in greater detail.

Creature wrote: ↑Mon May 31, 2021 4:24 pm

falcon45ca wrote: ↑Mon May 31, 2021 4:23 pm

Creature wrote: ↑Mon May 31, 2021 4:22 pm Guess I missed a lot of the discussion

Fortunately it's written down, so you can catch up if ya like

Kinda harder to catch up with it when you haven't been part of it

Auwt wrote: ↑Mon May 31, 2021 4:27 pm So then let's suppose there is a tie between two person during the Exile Phase, what's going to happen?

Auwt wrote: ↑Mon May 31, 2021 4:27 pm So then let's suppose there is a tie between two person during the Exile Phase, what's going to happen?

112 wrote: ↑Mon May 31, 2021 4:17 pm

Auwt wrote: ↑Mon May 31, 2021 4:16 pm Heyo I'm new here, not used to this interface nor this website.
How are we supposed to vote anyone here (to be executed) ?
And also where could I see the vote count ?

vote in the poll for whom you want yeeted and then [VOTE: player] aubergine in the thread w/o the extra space

vote count should be visible once you've voted in the poll

falcon45ca wrote: ↑Mon May 31, 2021 4:28 pm

Creature wrote: ↑Mon May 31, 2021 4:24 pm

falcon45ca wrote: ↑Mon May 31, 2021 4:23 pm

Creature wrote: ↑Mon May 31, 2021 4:22 pm Guess I missed a lot of the discussion

Fortunately it's written down, so you can catch up if ya like

Kinda harder to catch up with it when you haven't been part of it

So you're of the mind you can only engage in the game when discussion occurs while you are present?


Huh. That's a new one for me

falcon45ca wrote: ↑Mon May 31, 2021 4:27 pm

Wiml wrote: ↑Mon May 31, 2021 4:24 pm

falcon45ca wrote: ↑Mon May 31, 2021 4:21 pm

Wiml wrote: ↑Mon May 31, 2021 4:09 pm

MissSparkles wrote: ↑Mon May 31, 2021 4:01 pm

Wiml wrote: ↑Mon May 31, 2021 3:48 pm

cat wrote: ↑Mon May 31, 2021 11:48 am

Do you think the traitors will try to contact eachother? Should we look for softs?

I'm reading this and the thing that actually stands out to me is actually something different to what was brought up.

I'll explain it better in a moment but coming into the thread with an immediate focus on potential partners is wolfy and it's part of the mindset I woukd expect from a lost wolf in this scenario.

Didn’t I say just that? Maybe I worded it poorly?

My reading comprehension is sometimes hit or miss lol.

I interpreted that you were saying it was wolfy because you interpreted it as it being something like a purposeful mention by cat to either soft lost wolf or to nudge other lost wolves into trying to communicate and/or being wary of getting spotted (even if they didn't realise it was a post from a lost wolf).

What I'm trying to say here is that I think the post is wolfy but for a slightly different reason actually looking at it again. I think a lost wolf comes into the thread with thoughts about teammates on their mind (communicating with / finding / etc) and I think that it's >rand likely for a lost wolf to unconsciously bring up the topic of communication between lost wolves in this way because it's something already on their mind coming into the thread (and therefore making them more likely to mention it). So a small TMI slip pretty much as opposed to a purposeful soft.

That's the difference I was trying to suggest, at least.

This looks like backpedalling to me dude

I explained what Sparkles was saying and I explained my different interpretation of the post to her.

That's not back pedalling. I came out of that post saying the same thing I had said just above but in greater detail.

"I think the post is wolfy, but for a slightly different reason looking back at it actually"


That's not explaining what you meant more clearly, that’s going back to your own read and adjusting the reason you felt that way about it. Backpedaling

Wiml wrote: ↑Mon May 31, 2021 4:32 pm

falcon45ca wrote: ↑Mon May 31, 2021 4:27 pm

Wiml wrote: ↑Mon May 31, 2021 4:24 pm

falcon45ca wrote: ↑Mon May 31, 2021 4:21 pm

Wiml wrote: ↑Mon May 31, 2021 4:09 pm

MissSparkles wrote: ↑Mon May 31, 2021 4:01 pm

Wiml wrote: ↑Mon May 31, 2021 3:48 pm

I'm reading this and the thing that actually stands out to me is actually something different to what was brought up.

I'll explain it better in a moment but coming into the thread with an immediate focus on potential partners is wolfy and it's part of the mindset I woukd expect from a lost wolf in this scenario.

Didn’t I say just that? Maybe I worded it poorly?

My reading comprehension is sometimes hit or miss lol.

I interpreted that you were saying it was wolfy because you interpreted it as it being something like a purposeful mention by cat to either soft lost wolf or to nudge other lost wolves into trying to communicate and/or being wary of getting spotted (even if they didn't realise it was a post from a lost wolf).

What I'm trying to say here is that I think the post is wolfy but for a slightly different reason actually looking at it again. I think a lost wolf comes into the thread with thoughts about teammates on their mind (communicating with / finding / etc) and I think that it's >rand likely for a lost wolf to unconsciously bring up the topic of communication between lost wolves in this way because it's something already on their mind coming into the thread (and therefore making them more likely to mention it). So a small TMI slip pretty much as opposed to a purposeful soft.

That's the difference I was trying to suggest, at least.

This looks like backpedalling to me dude

I explained what Sparkles was saying and I explained my different interpretation of the post to her.

That's not back pedalling. I came out of that post saying the same thing I had said just above but in greater detail.

"I think the post is wolfy, but for a slightly different reason looking back at it actually"


That's not explaining what you meant more clearly, that’s going back to your own read and adjusting the reason you felt that way about it. Backpedaling

So you think me going back to review a slight scumread (when under no form of pressure to do so) and coming out saying "I stand by my read but I think there is a more likely interpretation of this post" is wolfy? How??? How does that post come from a wolf mindset? Why is it more likely that a wolf does that than a town?

I don't think you're genuinely trying to read me here as much as you're using buzzwords to try to misrepresent what I'm doing.

Auwt wrote: ↑Mon May 31, 2021 4:35 pm I am just going to follow the trend then for now.

cat wrote: ↑Mon May 31, 2021 11:48 am

Creature wrote: ↑Mon May 31, 2021 10:14 am I wonder how we'll find the traitors

Do you think the traitors will try to contact eachother? Should we look for softs?

falcon45ca wrote: ↑Mon May 31, 2021 4:37 pm

Wiml wrote: ↑Mon May 31, 2021 4:32 pm

falcon45ca wrote: ↑Mon May 31, 2021 4:27 pm

Wiml wrote: ↑Mon May 31, 2021 4:24 pm

falcon45ca wrote: ↑Mon May 31, 2021 4:21 pm

Wiml wrote: ↑Mon May 31, 2021 4:09 pm

MissSparkles wrote: ↑Mon May 31, 2021 4:01 pm

Didn’t I say just that? Maybe I worded it poorly?

My reading comprehension is sometimes hit or miss lol.

I interpreted that you were saying it was wolfy because you interpreted it as it being something like a purposeful mention by cat to either soft lost wolf or to nudge other lost wolves into trying to communicate and/or being wary of getting spotted (even if they didn't realise it was a post from a lost wolf).

What I'm trying to say here is that I think the post is wolfy but for a slightly different reason actually looking at it again. I think a lost wolf comes into the thread with thoughts about teammates on their mind (communicating with / finding / etc) and I think that it's >rand likely for a lost wolf to unconsciously bring up the topic of communication between lost wolves in this way because it's something already on their mind coming into the thread (and therefore making them more likely to mention it). So a small TMI slip pretty much as opposed to a purposeful soft.

That's the difference I was trying to suggest, at least.

This looks like backpedalling to me dude

I explained what Sparkles was saying and I explained my different interpretation of the post to her.

That's not back pedalling. I came out of that post saying the same thing I had said just above but in greater detail.

"I think the post is wolfy, but for a slightly different reason looking back at it actually"


That's not explaining what you meant more clearly, that’s going back to your own read and adjusting the reason you felt that way about it. Backpedaling

So you think me going back to review a slight scumread (when under no form of pressure to do so) and coming out saying "I stand by my read but I think there is a more likely interpretation of this post" is wolfy? How??? How does that post come from a wolf mindset? Why is it more likely that a wolf does that than a town?

I don't think you're genuinely trying to read me here as much as you're using buzzwords to try to misrepresent what I'm doing.

backpedal is a buzzword, oh my lanta. That's a good one.


You were questioned by MissSparkle on just repeating what she'd already said, and now you say you were under no pressure? Okie dokie then

Wiml wrote: ↑Mon May 31, 2021 4:09 pm

MissSparkles wrote: ↑Mon May 31, 2021 4:01 pm

Wiml wrote: ↑Mon May 31, 2021 3:48 pm

cat wrote: ↑Mon May 31, 2021 11:48 am

Creature wrote: ↑Mon May 31, 2021 10:14 am I wonder how we'll find the traitors

Do you think the traitors will try to contact eachother? Should we look for softs?

I'm reading this and the thing that actually stands out to me is actually something different to what was brought up.

I'll explain it better in a moment but coming into the thread with an immediate focus on potential partners is wolfy and it's part of the mindset I woukd expect from a lost wolf in this scenario.

Didn’t I say just that? Maybe I worded it poorly?

My reading comprehension is sometimes hit or miss lol.

I interpreted that you were saying it was wolfy because you interpreted it as it being something like a purposeful mention by cat to either soft lost wolf or to nudge other lost wolves into trying to communicate and/or being wary of getting spotted (even if they didn't realise it was a post from a lost wolf).

What I'm trying to say here is that I think the post is wolfy but for a slightly different reason actually looking at it again. I think a lost wolf comes into the thread with thoughts about teammates on their mind (communicating with / finding / etc) and I think that it's >rand likely for a lost wolf to unconsciously bring up the topic of communication between lost wolves in this way because it's something already on their mind coming into the thread (and therefore making them more likely to mention it). So a small TMI slip pretty much as opposed to a purposeful soft.

That's the difference I was trying to suggest, at least.

Wiml wrote: ↑Mon May 31, 2021 4:44 pm

falcon45ca wrote: ↑Mon May 31, 2021 4:37 pm

Wiml wrote: ↑Mon May 31, 2021 4:32 pm

falcon45ca wrote: ↑Mon May 31, 2021 4:27 pm

Wiml wrote: ↑Mon May 31, 2021 4:24 pm

falcon45ca wrote: ↑Mon May 31, 2021 4:21 pm

Wiml wrote: ↑Mon May 31, 2021 4:09 pm

My reading comprehension is sometimes hit or miss lol.

I interpreted that you were saying it was wolfy because you interpreted it as it being something like a purposeful mention by cat to either soft lost wolf or to nudge other lost wolves into trying to communicate and/or being wary of getting spotted (even if they didn't realise it was a post from a lost wolf).

What I'm trying to say here is that I think the post is wolfy but for a slightly different reason actually looking at it again. I think a lost wolf comes into the thread with thoughts about teammates on their mind (communicating with / finding / etc) and I think that it's >rand likely for a lost wolf to unconsciously bring up the topic of communication between lost wolves in this way because it's something already on their mind coming into the thread (and therefore making them more likely to mention it). So a small TMI slip pretty much as opposed to a purposeful soft.

That's the difference I was trying to suggest, at least.

This looks like backpedalling to me dude

I explained what Sparkles was saying and I explained my different interpretation of the post to her.

That's not back pedalling. I came out of that post saying the same thing I had said just above but in greater detail.

"I think the post is wolfy, but for a slightly different reason looking back at it actually"


That's not explaining what you meant more clearly, that’s going back to your own read and adjusting the reason you felt that way about it. Backpedaling

So you think me going back to review a slight scumread (when under no form of pressure to do so) and coming out saying "I stand by my read but I think there is a more likely interpretation of this post" is wolfy? How??? How does that post come from a wolf mindset? Why is it more likely that a wolf does that than a town?

I don't think you're genuinely trying to read me here as much as you're using buzzwords to try to misrepresent what I'm doing.

backpedal is a buzzword, oh my lanta. That's a good one.


You were questioned by MissSparkle on just repeating what she'd already said, and now you say you were under no pressure? Okie dokie then

You should read the post I was originally questioned on where I described the last paragraph of the post you're quoting but in less detail. My read didn't change between that post and when I expanded on it. (I'm not sure if you're misinterpreting my wording here as saying that it had? I think the small quote you took makes it look that way without the full context. If that's the case then I understand what you actually mean here but if you just read the reads post above this one then it's very clear my read is the same between the two of them lol and I haven't backpedalled at all).

112 wrote: ↑Mon May 31, 2021 4:15 pm @Wiml MissS is forcing every post. trying really hard to look involved and contributing right off the starting line. she's talking more than there are things to talk about. i take her as scum who really wants to have a good scum game this time.

tbh some of the read comes down to me seeing my own scum game in her right now. she's playing like i do when i'm geared up for a long wolf game.

falcon45ca wrote: ↑Mon May 31, 2021 4:21 pm

Wiml wrote: ↑Mon May 31, 2021 4:09 pm

MissSparkles wrote: ↑Mon May 31, 2021 4:01 pm

Wiml wrote: ↑Mon May 31, 2021 3:48 pm

cat wrote: ↑Mon May 31, 2021 11:48 am

Creature wrote: ↑Mon May 31, 2021 10:14 am I wonder how we'll find the traitors

Do you think the traitors will try to contact eachother? Should we look for softs?

I'm reading this and the thing that actually stands out to me is actually something different to what was brought up.

I'll explain it better in a moment but coming into the thread with an immediate focus on potential partners is wolfy and it's part of the mindset I woukd expect from a lost wolf in this scenario.

Didn’t I say just that? Maybe I worded it poorly?

My reading comprehension is sometimes hit or miss lol.

I interpreted that you were saying it was wolfy because you interpreted it as it being something like a purposeful mention by cat to either soft lost wolf or to nudge other lost wolves into trying to communicate and/or being wary of getting spotted (even if they didn't realise it was a post from a lost wolf).

What I'm trying to say here is that I think the post is wolfy but for a slightly different reason actually looking at it again. I think a lost wolf comes into the thread with thoughts about teammates on their mind (communicating with / finding / etc) and I think that it's >rand likely for a lost wolf to unconsciously bring up the topic of communication between lost wolves in this way because it's something already on their mind coming into the thread (and therefore making them more likely to mention it). So a small TMI slip pretty much as opposed to a purposeful soft.

That's the difference I was trying to suggest, at least.

This looks like backpedalling to me dude

MissSparkles wrote: ↑Mon May 31, 2021 4:55 pm

112 wrote: ↑Mon May 31, 2021 4:15 pm @Wiml MissS is forcing every post. trying really hard to look involved and contributing right off the starting line. she's talking more than there are things to talk about. i take her as scum who really wants to have a good scum game this time.

tbh some of the read comes down to me seeing my own scum game in her right now. she's playing like i do when i'm geared up for a long wolf game.

I can see where you get that impression from, but there’s a pretty obvi flip side to this and maybe it’s just that I’m town who also wants to have a good game in my syndicate debut.

It would be easier in my first scum game on a new site too just lay low especially in a game with no NK.

Again feels fake and just trying to push the envelope, stopping the vocal towny by placing doubt.

Wiml wrote: ↑Mon May 31, 2021 4:22 pm

112 wrote: ↑Mon May 31, 2021 4:15 pm @Wiml MissS is forcing every post. trying really hard to look involved and contributing right off the starting line. she's talking more than there are things to talk about. i take her as scum who really wants to have a good scum game this time.

tbh some of the read comes down to me seeing my own scum game in her right now. she's playing like i do when i'm geared up for a long wolf game.

Thanks! There's not much I can add to this but I appreciate your clarification.

MacDougall wrote: ↑Mon May 31, 2021 5:00 pm

MissSparkles wrote: ↑Mon May 31, 2021 4:55 pm

112 wrote: ↑Mon May 31, 2021 4:15 pm @Wiml MissS is forcing every post. trying really hard to look involved and contributing right off the starting line. she's talking more than there are things to talk about. i take her as scum who really wants to have a good scum game this time.

tbh some of the read comes down to me seeing my own scum game in her right now. she's playing like i do when i'm geared up for a long wolf game.

I can see where you get that impression from, but there’s a pretty obvi flip side to this and maybe it’s just that I’m town who also wants to have a good game in my syndicate debut.

It would be easier in my first scum game on a new site too just lay low especially in a game with no NK.

Again feels fake and just trying to push the envelope, stopping the vocal towny by placing doubt.

I like you but 112 is right lol

MissSparkles wrote: ↑Mon May 31, 2021 5:03 pm

MacDougall wrote: ↑Mon May 31, 2021 5:00 pm

MissSparkles wrote: ↑Mon May 31, 2021 4:55 pm

112 wrote: ↑Mon May 31, 2021 4:15 pm @Wiml MissS is forcing every post. trying really hard to look involved and contributing right off the starting line. she's talking more than there are things to talk about. i take her as scum who really wants to have a good scum game this time.

tbh some of the read comes down to me seeing my own scum game in her right now. she's playing like i do when i'm geared up for a long wolf game.

I can see where you get that impression from, but there’s a pretty obvi flip side to this and maybe it’s just that I’m town who also wants to have a good game in my syndicate debut.

It would be easier in my first scum game on a new site too just lay low especially in a game with no NK.

Again feels fake and just trying to push the envelope, stopping the vocal towny by placing doubt.

I like you but 112 is right lol

You don’t even know how I play so you can’t really weigh in properly now can you? So might be best to let me play.

Wiml wrote: ↑Mon May 31, 2021 4:24 pm

falcon45ca wrote: ↑Mon May 31, 2021 4:21 pm

Wiml wrote: ↑Mon May 31, 2021 4:09 pm

MissSparkles wrote: ↑Mon May 31, 2021 4:01 pm

Wiml wrote: ↑Mon May 31, 2021 3:48 pm

cat wrote: ↑Mon May 31, 2021 11:48 am

Creature wrote: ↑Mon May 31, 2021 10:14 am I wonder how we'll find the traitors

Do you think the traitors will try to contact eachother? Should we look for softs?

I'm reading this and the thing that actually stands out to me is actually something different to what was brought up.

I'll explain it better in a moment but coming into the thread with an immediate focus on potential partners is wolfy and it's part of the mindset I woukd expect from a lost wolf in this scenario.

Didn’t I say just that? Maybe I worded it poorly?

My reading comprehension is sometimes hit or miss lol.

I interpreted that you were saying it was wolfy because you interpreted it as it being something like a purposeful mention by cat to either soft lost wolf or to nudge other lost wolves into trying to communicate and/or being wary of getting spotted (even if they didn't realise it was a post from a lost wolf).

What I'm trying to say here is that I think the post is wolfy but for a slightly different reason actually looking at it again. I think a lost wolf comes into the thread with thoughts about teammates on their mind (communicating with / finding / etc) and I think that it's >rand likely for a lost wolf to unconsciously bring up the topic of communication between lost wolves in this way because it's something already on their mind coming into the thread (and therefore making them more likely to mention it). So a small TMI slip pretty much as opposed to a purposeful soft.

That's the difference I was trying to suggest, at least.

This looks like backpedalling to me dude

I explained what Sparkles was saying and I explained my different interpretation of the post to her.

That's not back pedalling. I came out of that post saying the same thing I had said just above but in greater detail.

MacDougall wrote: ↑Mon May 31, 2021 5:03 pm

MissSparkles wrote: ↑Mon May 31, 2021 5:03 pm

MacDougall wrote: ↑Mon May 31, 2021 5:00 pm

MissSparkles wrote: ↑Mon May 31, 2021 4:55 pm

112 wrote: ↑Mon May 31, 2021 4:15 pm @Wiml MissS is forcing every post. trying really hard to look involved and contributing right off the starting line. she's talking more than there are things to talk about. i take her as scum who really wants to have a good scum game this time.

tbh some of the read comes down to me seeing my own scum game in her right now. she's playing like i do when i'm geared up for a long wolf game.

I can see where you get that impression from, but there’s a pretty obvi flip side to this and maybe it’s just that I’m town who also wants to have a good game in my syndicate debut.

It would be easier in my first scum game on a new site too just lay low especially in a game with no NK.

Again feels fake and just trying to push the envelope, stopping the vocal towny by placing doubt.

I like you but 112 is right lol

You don’t even know how I play so you can’t really weigh in properly now can you? So might be best to let me play.

Does anyone here?

MissSparkles wrote: ↑Mon May 31, 2021 5:10 pm

MacDougall wrote: ↑Mon May 31, 2021 5:03 pm

MissSparkles wrote: ↑Mon May 31, 2021 5:03 pm

MacDougall wrote: ↑Mon May 31, 2021 5:00 pm

MissSparkles wrote: ↑Mon May 31, 2021 4:55 pm

112 wrote: ↑Mon May 31, 2021 4:15 pm @Wiml MissS is forcing every post. trying really hard to look involved and contributing right off the starting line. she's talking more than there are things to talk about. i take her as scum who really wants to have a good scum game this time.

tbh some of the read comes down to me seeing my own scum game in her right now. she's playing like i do when i'm geared up for a long wolf game.

I can see where you get that impression from, but there’s a pretty obvi flip side to this and maybe it’s just that I’m town who also wants to have a good game in my syndicate debut.

It would be easier in my first scum game on a new site too just lay low especially in a game with no NK.

Again feels fake and just trying to push the envelope, stopping the vocal towny by placing doubt.

I like you but 112 is right lol

You don’t even know how I play so you can’t really weigh in properly now can you? So might be best to let me play.

Does anyone here?

Marmot? We had an interaction about it, maybe read our posts instead of supporting a dumb meta read that can’t even be applied cause you and 112 have no idea how I play.

Creature wrote: ↑Mon May 31, 2021 5:06 pm Saw MissSparks is top poster. Is there any indication this is wolf topposting?

Gavial wrote: ↑Mon May 31, 2021 9:30 am Welcome to the Village of Happiness where there is no mafia to hurt us, but there is traitors and if enough go into those mountains of exile they could destroy this entire village so ugh get rid of those traitors yeah?

Day 1 Begins!

@Wisdom
@Long Con
@KGMurphy
@MacDougall
@Creature
@Gira
@cat
@falcon45ca
@Marmot
@112
@Poison
@MissSparkles
@KZA
@Wiml
@Auwt

MacDougall wrote: ↑Mon May 31, 2021 5:12 pm

MissSparkles wrote: ↑Mon May 31, 2021 5:10 pm

MacDougall wrote: ↑Mon May 31, 2021 5:03 pm

MissSparkles wrote: ↑Mon May 31, 2021 5:03 pm

MacDougall wrote: ↑Mon May 31, 2021 5:00 pm

MissSparkles wrote: ↑Mon May 31, 2021 4:55 pm

112 wrote: ↑Mon May 31, 2021 4:15 pm @Wiml MissS is forcing every post. trying really hard to look involved and contributing right off the starting line. she's talking more than there are things to talk about. i take her as scum who really wants to have a good scum game this time.

tbh some of the read comes down to me seeing my own scum game in her right now. she's playing like i do when i'm geared up for a long wolf game.

I can see where you get that impression from, but there’s a pretty obvi flip side to this and maybe it’s just that I’m town who also wants to have a good game in my syndicate debut.

It would be easier in my first scum game on a new site too just lay low especially in a game with no NK.

Again feels fake and just trying to push the envelope, stopping the vocal towny by placing doubt.

I like you but 112 is right lol

You don’t even know how I play so you can’t really weigh in properly now can you? So might be best to let me play.

Does anyone here?

Marmot? We had an interaction about it, maybe read our posts instead of supporting a dumb meta read that can’t even be applied cause you and 112 have no idea how I play.

Please don't be so hostile.

MacDougall wrote: ↑Mon May 31, 2021 5:15 pmok

falcon45ca wrote: ↑Mon May 31, 2021 4:27 pm

Wiml wrote: ↑Mon May 31, 2021 4:24 pm

falcon45ca wrote: ↑Mon May 31, 2021 4:21 pm

Wiml wrote: ↑Mon May 31, 2021 4:09 pm

MissSparkles wrote: ↑Mon May 31, 2021 4:01 pm

Wiml wrote: ↑Mon May 31, 2021 3:48 pm

cat wrote: ↑Mon May 31, 2021 11:48 am

Do you think the traitors will try to contact eachother? Should we look for softs?

I'm reading this and the thing that actually stands out to me is actually something different to what was brought up.

I'll explain it better in a moment but coming into the thread with an immediate focus on potential partners is wolfy and it's part of the mindset I woukd expect from a lost wolf in this scenario.

Didn’t I say just that? Maybe I worded it poorly?

My reading comprehension is sometimes hit or miss lol.

I interpreted that you were saying it was wolfy because you interpreted it as it being something like a purposeful mention by cat to either soft lost wolf or to nudge other lost wolves into trying to communicate and/or being wary of getting spotted (even if they didn't realise it was a post from a lost wolf).

What I'm trying to say here is that I think the post is wolfy but for a slightly different reason actually looking at it again. I think a lost wolf comes into the thread with thoughts about teammates on their mind (communicating with / finding / etc) and I think that it's >rand likely for a lost wolf to unconsciously bring up the topic of communication between lost wolves in this way because it's something already on their mind coming into the thread (and therefore making them more likely to mention it). So a small TMI slip pretty much as opposed to a purposeful soft.

That's the difference I was trying to suggest, at least.

This looks like backpedalling to me dude

I explained what Sparkles was saying and I explained my different interpretation of the post to her.

That's not back pedalling. I came out of that post saying the same thing I had said just above but in greater detail.

"I think the post is wolfy, but for a slightly different reason looking back at it actually"


That's not explaining what you meant more clearly, that’s going back to your own read and adjusting the reason you felt that way about it. Backpedaling

MissSparkles wrote: ↑Mon May 31, 2021 5:01 pm

Wiml wrote: ↑Mon May 31, 2021 4:22 pm

112 wrote: ↑Mon May 31, 2021 4:15 pm @Wiml MissS is forcing every post. trying really hard to look involved and contributing right off the starting line. she's talking more than there are things to talk about. i take her as scum who really wants to have a good scum game this time.

tbh some of the read comes down to me seeing my own scum game in her right now. she's playing like i do when i'm geared up for a long wolf game.

Thanks! There's not much I can add to this but I appreciate your clarification.

What did you really think about his input? Be honest, i might be biased based on knowing i’m town so I want you too weigh in.

Doesn’t it feel like a scum read just for the sake of it and to be different/offer an alternative thought to my playstyle so I don’t continue getting town reads and become a problem for the traitors? Traitors can’t kill off correct universal town reads in this game and I was only getting town reads before he brought about his “suspicions”.

Still more confident in Cat, but it’s definitely something to think about considering if he is a Traitor there’s no doubt he doesn’t also think Cat is too.

Wiml wrote: ↑Mon May 31, 2021 5:29 pm

MissSparkles wrote: ↑Mon May 31, 2021 5:01 pm

Wiml wrote: ↑Mon May 31, 2021 4:22 pm

112 wrote: ↑Mon May 31, 2021 4:15 pm @Wiml MissS is forcing every post. trying really hard to look involved and contributing right off the starting line. she's talking more than there are things to talk about. i take her as scum who really wants to have a good scum game this time.

tbh some of the read comes down to me seeing my own scum game in her right now. she's playing like i do when i'm geared up for a long wolf game.

Thanks! There's not much I can add to this but I appreciate your clarification.

What did you really think about his input? Be honest, i might be biased based on knowing i’m town so I want you too weigh in.

Doesn’t it feel like a scum read just for the sake of it and to be different/offer an alternative thought to my playstyle so I don’t continue getting town reads and become a problem for the traitors? Traitors can’t kill off correct universal town reads in this game and I was only getting town reads before he brought about his “suspicions”.

Still more confident in Cat, but it’s definitely something to think about considering if he is a Traitor there’s no doubt he doesn’t also think Cat is too.

I understand your concern (it's why I asked for a clarification on the read on you in particular: I had a similar wariness to you about the read, although I thought 112's entrance was towny overall).

After reading the response, I honestly don't have much to respond about the validity of the points said there but I think the thought process behind the read seems pretty genuine (from the comparison to past scum games as well as the small amount of narrative building which is something I find comes as a result of genuine solving more often than not) and I can see how 112 could realistically think that you were going for a look towny -> powerwolf strategy.

I think particularly the line "she's talking more than there are things to talk about" reminds me of my last wolf game and how purposefully overactive I was and I can understand this point in particular coming from a town who is relatively paranoid at seeing a player possibly setting themself up to try to go deep.

So tl;dr I think the explanation is fine!

MissSparkles wrote: ↑Mon May 31, 2021 5:10 pm

MacDougall wrote: ↑Mon May 31, 2021 5:03 pm

MissSparkles wrote: ↑Mon May 31, 2021 5:03 pm

MacDougall wrote: ↑Mon May 31, 2021 5:00 pm

MissSparkles wrote: ↑Mon May 31, 2021 4:55 pm

112 wrote: ↑Mon May 31, 2021 4:15 pm @Wiml MissS is forcing every post. trying really hard to look involved and contributing right off the starting line. she's talking more than there are things to talk about. i take her as scum who really wants to have a good scum game this time.

tbh some of the read comes down to me seeing my own scum game in her right now. she's playing like i do when i'm geared up for a long wolf game.

I can see where you get that impression from, but there’s a pretty obvi flip side to this and maybe it’s just that I’m town who also wants to have a good game in my syndicate debut.

It would be easier in my first scum game on a new site too just lay low especially in a game with no NK.

Again feels fake and just trying to push the envelope, stopping the vocal towny by placing doubt.

I like you but 112 is right lol

You don’t even know how I play so you can’t really weigh in properly now can you? So might be best to let me play.

Does anyone here?

Marmot? We had an interaction about it, maybe read our posts instead of supporting a dumb meta read that can’t even be applied cause you and 112 have no idea how I play.

MissSparkles wrote: ↑Mon May 31, 2021 5:03 pm

MacDougall wrote: ↑Mon May 31, 2021 5:00 pm

MissSparkles wrote: ↑Mon May 31, 2021 4:55 pm

112 wrote: ↑Mon May 31, 2021 4:15 pm @Wiml MissS is forcing every post. trying really hard to look involved and contributing right off the starting line. she's talking more than there are things to talk about. i take her as scum who really wants to have a good scum game this time.

tbh some of the read comes down to me seeing my own scum game in her right now. she's playing like i do when i'm geared up for a long wolf game.

I can see where you get that impression from, but there’s a pretty obvi flip side to this and maybe it’s just that I’m town who also wants to have a good game in my syndicate debut.

It would be easier in my first scum game on a new site too just lay low especially in a game with no NK.

Again feels fake and just trying to push the envelope, stopping the vocal towny by placing doubt.

I like you but 112 is right lol

You don’t even know how I play so you can’t really weigh in properly now can you? So might be best to let me play.

112 wrote: ↑Mon May 31, 2021 5:46 pm

MissSparkles wrote: ↑Mon May 31, 2021 5:10 pm

MacDougall wrote: ↑Mon May 31, 2021 5:03 pm

MissSparkles wrote: ↑Mon May 31, 2021 5:03 pm

MacDougall wrote: ↑Mon May 31, 2021 5:00 pm

MissSparkles wrote: ↑Mon May 31, 2021 4:55 pm

112 wrote: ↑Mon May 31, 2021 4:15 pm @Wiml MissS is forcing every post. trying really hard to look involved and contributing right off the starting line. she's talking more than there are things to talk about. i take her as scum who really wants to have a good scum game this time.

tbh some of the read comes down to me seeing my own scum game in her right now. she's playing like i do when i'm geared up for a long wolf game.

I can see where you get that impression from, but there’s a pretty obvi flip side to this and maybe it’s just that I’m town who also wants to have a good game in my syndicate debut.

It would be easier in my first scum game on a new site too just lay low especially in a game with no NK.

Again feels fake and just trying to push the envelope, stopping the vocal towny by placing doubt.

I like you but 112 is right lol

You don’t even know how I play so you can’t really weigh in properly now can you? So might be best to let me play.

Does anyone here?

Marmot? We had an interaction about it, maybe read our posts instead of supporting a dumb meta read that can’t even be applied cause you and 112 have no idea how I play.

Not all reads = meta reads.