The Syndicate

DrWilgy wrote:

S~V~S wrote:

DrWilgy wrote:

Quin wrote:DrWilgy, feel my wrath.

Ack! I have felt wrath!

@SVS, do you have thoughts on players oustide of Matt? What do you think of Long Con's entry?

@Llama, who is bad?

@MyWonderfulWaifu, what do you think of my rainbow and the reasons behind my suspicion?

G-Man and Sloon are the only two who have addressed or at least questioned thier placement on my list. I'd be down for lynching LC, SVS, or Wilgette at this rate.

Offhand, not much yet. Too much goofballyness. Did you see my earlier post @G Man? Where I asked if he was going to add some content to the haikus? I would expect to see more from LC and hopefully do soon.

And why would I question your list? You generally tend to think I am bad, and you put yourself lower than I, lol. It was a day zero list

Do you think whether or not people question what is basically a throwaway list indicates their alignment?

See the thing is, you were the one player I lied about on my list. I actually am reading you right below Sig. I thought this was odd though, considering that I do normally read you as bad. Your response... er lack of makes me think you have civ intentions.

Also, I don't believe that my list was throwaway. Tone reads are valuable.

G-Man and LC are the two I'm most concerned with at this point. G-Man's haikus (while have bettered my personal state) have yet to better the game state. LC's little contributions were that of chaos. Llama's response to Quin has be razzled as well. Llama is normally quick to punish a no lyncher, but to do so in a game where the option isn't available makes me read that he's trying force replicate habits.

Wilgette not answering my question puts her low on my list, but I can't tell if she legitimately didn't want to respond because it was me or if she didn't want to lie this early. Knowing her I could see both as possibility.

Linki - But I am mafia

This seems to be the trend lately, mining the thread with faux reads to catch people with later on. This kind of thing makes me nervous, but you ARE a Doctor. So

I would expect amore involved bad LC, but if he had no show teammates,I can see it. Andyeah, I am waiting for those 18 haiku from G Man. I know self imposed posting thingies are GMans "thing" but he stillmanages to get topical content out there.

DrWilgy wrote:Matt, you are gonna draw heat. Sig was reffering to the poll from day 0.

Say something like "I was just kidding" then go back to attacking me.

Lol. Nah, I wanna keep going after sig.

Also, I know what he was referring to, I just felt like by him saying that, he was up to something sinister. As an indy in Arkham, I believe I also made a post during a night phase where I was like "ah nobody wants to go to 'such and such' with me? *sadface*" and I was totes bad/indy in that game, so I was wondering if sig was doing something similar.

That seems like a weak reason.

I made a day zero joke, it wasn't meant to be taken seriously. I dislike how you're using that as a reason.

Matt

Better then a No U...

The hostager becomes the hostageee.
*Wilgy points the gun he stole from Matt back at him, and pulls the trigger.*

*confettie flies out of the gun showering Matt with Wilgy's appreciation towards him*

Sig. What do you think of SVS's response to me?

S~V~S wrote:

DrWilgy wrote:

S~V~S wrote:

DrWilgy wrote:

Quin wrote:DrWilgy, feel my wrath.

Ack! I have felt wrath!

@SVS, do you have thoughts on players oustide of Matt? What do you think of Long Con's entry?

@Llama, who is bad?

@MyWonderfulWaifu, what do you think of my rainbow and the reasons behind my suspicion?

G-Man and Sloon are the only two who have addressed or at least questioned thier placement on my list. I'd be down for lynching LC, SVS, or Wilgette at this rate.

Offhand, not much yet. Too much goofballyness. Did you see my earlier post @G Man? Where I asked if he was going to add some content to the haikus? I would expect to see more from LC and hopefully do soon.

And why would I question your list? You generally tend to think I am bad, and you put yourself lower than I, lol. It was a day zero list

Do you think whether or not people question what is basically a throwaway list indicates their alignment?

See the thing is, you were the one player I lied about on my list. I actually am reading you right below Sig. I thought this was odd though, considering that I do normally read you as bad. Your response... er lack of makes me think you have civ intentions.

Also, I don't believe that my list was throwaway. Tone reads are valuable.

G-Man and LC are the two I'm most concerned with at this point. G-Man's haikus (while have bettered my personal state) have yet to better the game state. LC's little contributions were that of chaos. Llama's response to Quin has be razzled as well. Llama is normally quick to punish a no lyncher, but to do so in a game where the option isn't available makes me read that he's trying force replicate habits.

Wilgette not answering my question puts her low on my list, but I can't tell if she legitimately didn't want to respond because it was me or if she didn't want to lie this early. Knowing her I could see both as possibility.

Linki - But I am mafia

This seems to be the trend lately, mining the thread with faux reads to catch people with later on. This kind of thing makes me nervous, but you ARE a Doctor. So

I would expect amore involved bad LC, but if he had no show teammates,I can see it. Andyeah, I am waiting for those 18 haiku from G Man. I know self imposed posting thingies are GMans "thing" but he stillmanages to get topical content out there.

This post? It is interesting. I wouldn't say it is mafiaish or towny. I'd keep an eye on SVS, but would rather not lynch her.


@Matt you have no reason to suspect me, also you holding one of your civ reads hostage is scummy.

Wilgette,any thoughts?

G Man, any Haiku?

The sane 7 or 8 people are doing all the talking, and my self confidence is shot.

Linki, yeah, I would rather not lynch me, either.

lol, ebwop, the SaMe 7 or 8,not the saNe 7 or 8

matt if not sig, where would you look, theoretically?

D:
SVS should have high self confidence.

Dom, has your questions lead you to any interesting thoughts? I think it's odd that we have all these questions out of you yet no feedback responses.

*Kidnaps Sig*

Dom wrote:matt if not sig, where would you look, theoretically?

Scotty or Wilgette

You?

@sig dude in like every game we play together, you get lynched early, and whether I'm civ/indy/bad, I almost always say "omg we're lynching sig again? unbelievable". So for me to actually suspect you this early should tell you it's genuine.

Matt you can't lynch Sig. He's my hostage.

DrWilgy wrote:Matt you can't lynch Sig. He's my hostage.

Dammit Wilgy.

What do you make of Dom being so playful so far? Usually he's bad and he doesn't do that, so I'm thinking of throwing a few civ points his way.

[quote="S~V~S]I would expect amore involved bad LC, but if he had no show teammates,I can see it. Andyeah, I am waiting for those 18 haiku from G Man. I know self imposed posting thingies are GMans "thing" but he stillmanages to get topical content out there.[/quote]
I'll re-read the thread
Following my surgery
Tomorrow at Noon

How embarrassing
Accidentally cut out
A quotation mark

My quote fail aside
I will post observations
Friday afternoon

DrWilgy wrote:D:
SVS should have high self confidence.

Dom, has your questions lead you to any interesting thoughts? I think it's odd that we have all these questions out of you yet no feedback responses.

*Kidnaps Sig*

Unfortuantely not. :/

Matt wrote: @sig dude in like every game we play together, you get lynched early, and whether I'm civ/indy/bad, I almost always say "omg we're lynching sig again? unbelievable". So for me to actually suspect you this early should tell you it's genuine.

This, thought, does catch my eye.

Why yes, my suspicion is genuine, yes it is, genuine indeed.

Matt wrote:Also, is G-Man the type of player who always has some fun on Day 0/1, or should we be worried that his Haiku thing is some kind of sinister plot to destroy the town? Hrm.

I detect nothing sinister about G-Man's haiku plan. I doubt I will end up voting for him today.

Ha, oops, I was supposed to add that quote to my post I'm putting together while catching up. More to come soon.

DrWilgy wrote:

Long Con wrote:Sweet idea. Let's do it. Scotty, you go first.

Non commital chaos seeding. LC's probably bad.

Non-committal chaos seeding is not what I was doing here. I was daring Scotty to go through with it in more of a sarcastic way, because it seemed like a foolish thing to do, to flaunt the no role-outing rule. WTF is chaos seeding anyway?

Quin is a bit suspicious to me. Looks a little like he jumped on Wilgy when the temperature started to heat up a tiny bit.

I liked Sloonei's points against Llama, there were several little things that just looked a bit suspicious on their own, but together made Llama into a viable lynch candidate in my books.

DrWilgy wrote:LC's little contributions were that of chaos.

There's that chaos accusation again. This is the pot calling the white china tea kettle black.

I don't think I'm ready to lynch sig Day 1. I feel like I have seen it too often on sig, and I'd rather see him go later into the game.

Sorry for being a bit absent, I'll be here more often from now on.

its been a rough day for me, and I'm pressed for time. I apologize for my absence, though it's Day 1 and I don't see any pressing cases atm.

Matt wrote:

Dom wrote:matt if not sig, where would you look, theoretically?

Scotty or Wilgette

You?

@sig dude in like every game we play together, you get lynched early, and whether I'm civ/indy/bad, I almost always say "omg we're lynching sig again? unbelievable". So for me to actually suspect you this early should tell you it's genuine.

Nah dude not me

Chaos seeding - planting the seeds of chaos and disorder.

All I saw from you Mr LC was pushing something that would've been considered rule breaking. It's one thing to borderline rule break yourself but supporting the dorty actions of others just feels scummy.

Linki - Hi Scotty. Wanna team up again this game?

DrWilgy wrote:Chaos seeding - planting the seeds of chaos and disorder.

All I saw from you Mr LC was pushing something that would've been considered rule breaking. It's one thing to borderline rule break yourself but supporting the dorty actions of others just feels scummy.

Linki - Hi Scotty. Wanna team up again this game?

Last time I asked that of you and I was bad.

Does that mean you are bad this game?

I have three pages to read, but I am in Raleigh on a mini vacation for today and tomorrow and won't be able to read/post.

Scotty wrote:

DrWilgy wrote:Chaos seeding - planting the seeds of chaos and disorder.

All I saw from you Mr LC was pushing something that would've been considered rule breaking. It's one thing to borderline rule break yourself but supporting the dorty actions of others just feels scummy.

Linki - Hi Scotty. Wanna team up again this game?

Last time I asked that of you and I was bad.

Does that mean you are bad this game?

Idk, everytime I've asked I've been good so...

@Elo ypu can't go wrong with a LC or G-Man vote...

DrWilgy wrote:

Scotty wrote:

DrWilgy wrote:Chaos seeding - planting the seeds of chaos and disorder.

All I saw from you Mr LC was pushing something that would've been considered rule breaking. It's one thing to borderline rule break yourself but supporting the dorty actions of others just feels scummy.

Linki - Hi Scotty. Wanna team up again this game?

Last time I asked that of you and I was bad.

Does that mean you are bad this game?

Idk, everytime I've asked I've been good so...

@Elo ypu can't go wrong with a LC or G-Man vote...

I beg to differ
Trying to recall if your
Civ game is this gruff

S~V~S wrote:Well, that was not much catching up. Hopefully we see lots and lots of posting today

PFFT HAHAHAHAH

thellama73 wrote:In my experience, it is the ones who try to paint the ones who try to lynch the ones who push the no lynch option as mafia who are actually mafia.

No it honestly is normally a town thing to do, especially when you're just out of anything to say, or are stumped, or really need to not die day one for ~reasons~ Though I'm sure it's different here. Being if just one person voted, the one person voted gets lynches. And no votes count against you. Coming from a standpoint of having the option to no lynch, it's at just as bad as not voting at all here, only the penalty is put in place to make you interac(and sometimes irrationally imo)



Umm, those are really the only posts I felt like addressing directly by quoting, in regards to Matt and his Wilgy analysis thing. I could see it looking bad as, sloonei asked when he color coded it. I wouldn't agree on how Matt would assume something of Wilgy (even if I haven't known Wilgy as long as Matt has) but to be THAT ballsy is incredibly unlikely. I could see it if like, there was a third party role that wants to be visited/dead, but those role typically are boring (and obviously not in this game)

I've got less than 24 hours still and honestly, I would be fine lynching Matt.


Also, how's that for a shitty synopsis?

I disapprove of the Matt wagon.

I do approve of the LC or G-Man wagon though.

Maybe the Dom wagon too. You don't ask that many questions without forming some shareable thoughts afterwards, I think Dom feels content to ride out day 1.

*Pulls Sig out of his briefcase and shows Wilgette*
@Wilgette, can I keep'em? PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE!!! I'll take good care of him! feed him and water him regularly! I'll even take him for nice walks!

I am not a fan of the Wilgy wagon. So far I think Wilgy is definitely a doctor.

Long Con wrote:

DrWilgy wrote:

Long Con wrote:Sweet idea. Let's do it. Scotty, you go first.

Non commital chaos seeding. LC's probably bad.

Non-committal chaos seeding is not what I was doing here. I was daring Scotty to go through with it in more of a sarcastic way, because it seemed like a foolish thing to do, to flaunt the no role-outing rule. WTF is chaos seeding anyway?

I read this the way LC described it, tbh. If whatever you are seeing in LC is based on this, I can't say I agree. I see an LC who is not engaged yet, which would mean civ or no/low show baddie partners.

Speaking of no/low shows, Wilgy, have we frightened Wilgette into hiding under the bed?

Looking forward to those haiku, G Man. I know in the past you have always managed to deliver.

DrWilgy wrote:I disapprove of the Matt wagon.

I do approve of the LC or G-Man wagon though.

Maybe the Dom wagon too. You don't ask that many questions without forming some shareable thoughts afterwards, I think Dom feels content to ride out day 1.

*Pulls Sig out of his briefcase and shows Wilgette*
@Wilgette, can I keep'em? PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE!!! I'll take good care of him! feed him and water him regularly! I'll even take him for nice walks!

ok

Also, so Wilgette does not feel picked on, these folks all have less than 3 posts:

Bubbles
Eloh
Faraday
Ninja
Sorsha

Hopefully we see more of them over the weekend.

I'm putting a vote on Quin for now. I see that Wilgy has three votes, and that Wilgy is one of those votes. Really not cool with Wilgy's play so far, and I'd be happy to see him lynched too.

What did Quin do?

Long Con wrote:Quin is a bit suspicious to me. Looks a little like he jumped on Wilgy when the temperature started to heat up a tiny bit.

I didn't like his reactions to some things during my catchup read.

Long Con wrote:

Long Con wrote:Quin is a bit suspicious to me. Looks a little like he jumped on Wilgy when the temperature started to heat up a tiny bit.

I didn't like his reactions to some things during my catchup read.

What do you think of Scotty?

What do you think of Long Con?

Both Matt and Long Con are reading Civ to me, so I find Wilgy's accusation of chaos on LC weird. I guess I could vote for Wilgy today, but Sloonei still has my eye.

Also, G-Man has a history of fake, self-imposed curses, so I don't think his haikus are indicative of alignment either way.

thellama73 wrote:Both Matt and Long Con are reading Civ to me, so I find Wilgy's accusation of chaos on LC weird. I guess I could vote for Wilgy today, but Sloonei still has my eye.

Why Sloonei? I see nothing alarming there.

ebwop, I mean other than your initial thought about him, how he reacted to you. He has had a lot of content since then; has that content increased your suspision, and if so, why? Or has it had no effect on your suspicion?

S~V~S wrote:

thellama73 wrote:Both Matt and Long Con are reading Civ to me, so I find Wilgy's accusation of chaos on LC weird. I guess I could vote for Wilgy today, but Sloonei still has my eye.

Why Sloonei? I see nothing alarming there.

I just thought Sloonei's reaction to my criticism of the no lynch option (which I make in basically every game) was a little defensive and OTT. It's only a slight ping, but I don't have anything much stronger to go on right now.

S~V~S wrote:ebwop, I mean other than your initial thought about him, how he reacted to you. He has had a lot of content since then; has that content increased your suspision, and if so, why? Or has it had no effect on your suspicion?

Nothing really new other than the continued reaction to the No-Lynch discussion, which I refuse to continue at this point.

So all of his subsequent posts have had no impression on you>?

DrWilgy wrote:

Long Con wrote:

Long Con wrote:Quin is a bit suspicious to me. Looks a little like he jumped on Wilgy when the temperature started to heat up a tiny bit.

I didn't like his reactions to some things during my catchup read.

What do you think of Scotty?

What do you think of Long Con?

I think Scotty is Civ. I think Long Con is a dangerous man to mess with. And also, Long Con is a Civ, so stop trying to lynch him please.

S~V~S wrote:So all of his subsequent posts have had no impression on you>?

Not especially, no.

Long Con wrote:

DrWilgy wrote:

Long Con wrote:

Long Con wrote:Quin is a bit suspicious to me. Looks a little like he jumped on Wilgy when the temperature started to heat up a tiny bit.

I didn't like his reactions to some things during my catchup read.

What do you think of Scotty?

What do you think of Long Con?

I think Scotty is Civ. I think Long Con is a dangerous man to mess with. And also, Long Con is a Civ, so stop trying to lynch him please.

Long Con, you are always so tricksy. I hope you are not tricking me today.

thellama73 wrote:

S~V~S wrote:So all of his subsequent posts have had no impression on you>?

Not especially, no.

Good to know.

Voting *Llama* for not. May change, may not. His subsequent posts may sway my opinion.

S~V~S wrote:

thellama73 wrote:

S~V~S wrote:So all of his subsequent posts have had no impression on you>?

Not especially, no.

Good to know.

Voting *Llama* for not. May change, may not. His subsequent posts may sway my opinion.

I look forward to working with you in the future.

Well, if you make more posts, I will certainly consider them into account when I weigh my final vote.

thellama73 wrote:

Long Con wrote:

DrWilgy wrote:

Long Con wrote:

Long Con wrote:Quin is a bit suspicious to me. Looks a little like he jumped on Wilgy when the temperature started to heat up a tiny bit.

I didn't like his reactions to some things during my catchup read.

What do you think of Scotty?

What do you think of Long Con?

I think Scotty is Civ. I think Long Con is a dangerous man to mess with. And also, Long Con is a Civ, so stop trying to lynch him please.

Long Con, you are always so tricksy. I hope you are not tricking me today.

I haven't even done anything, I have no tricks to play. And I'm not really that tricksy, I don't know why people like to spread that rumour. Don't let the name fool you, it was invented for different reasons before I started playing Mafia.

So as to not be a wallflower, I am letting you know that I am alive but more busy than I anticipated. I'll be contributing tonight after work. Sorry for not participating much yet.