Re: [Day 4] Bullets Over Broadway Mafia
Posted: Fri Jun 26, 2015 1:46 pm
Bite me, Mr. hieroglyphical. you alphabetarian now?Epignosis wrote:Doubly cursed.
Murder, Mayhem, and Mafia
https://www.mafiathesyndicate.com/
Bite me, Mr. hieroglyphical. you alphabetarian now?Epignosis wrote:Doubly cursed.
You seem surprised and oddly pleased, considering I was vaguely one of your top suspects for three days.Long Con wrote:Sloonei... was targeted and survived? Way to go, Sloon!
there are ten thousand things to love about this post.G-Man wrote:Bite me, Mr. hieroglyphical. you alphabetarian now?Epignosis wrote:Doubly cursed.
My implication is that you aren't doing anything at all this game. I don't know if I find that suspicious or not yet but it would be great if you would start playing regularly. I'm not a fan of your new game play.Metalmarsh89 wrote:So you think I am not interested in hunting baddies. But you are not suspicious of me? Or more accurately, you stated that Bass is your only suspicion aside from G-Man.Black Rock wrote:Bass.FZ. wrote:I am leaving and will be back in about 30 hours.
MM, You're set on lynching LC. I don't know why, and maybe he's bad, but I don't get why you're only focusing on one person. Last game we played together you were a lot more helpful. I'm kind of disappointed.
Like I said, I'm worried about Timmer not being here. He hasn't said much last day and I wonder if he's now silenced. If so, I would be tempted to say he did it to himself. But I'll wait and see if he comes back.
I'm beyond worrying about TH. Don't know what's up with him.
BR, can you please again state who you are suspicious of besides G-man?
I'm still suspicious of Splints and I hope she comes in to defend herself.
Scotty, you were the one most engaged in solving the PMs. What do you think about the corruption PM, if there really was one, and how does that influence what you think happened in the night regarding Sloonei.
Those are my questions for now. I'd appreciate people answering them. Thanks
And you just made an implication that I am bad.
I hope you aren't taking this beyond the game personally. You go after me the same way every single game. Usually because I'm not playing up to BR standards, I don't even know what that means. I could see it starting as soon as you subbed in.FZ. wrote:Black Rock wrote:Yes and I have stated them FZ. I'm entirely tired of you each game.FZ. wrote:Do you? O mean suspicionsBlack Rock wrote:Cobalt wrote:SCUMMYSloonei wrote:what are your thoughts on everything and everyone?Cobalt wrote:omfg me and LC are not teammates i want him SPIT ROASTED.
lynch him and then lynch me for all I give a negative fuck
more later.
Do you have any real opinions on other players?![]()
I guess I'll leave then.
Bye
Now wait just a minute. Aren't you accusing me of playing with a different style that you find unhelpful?Black Rock wrote:I hope you aren't taking this beyond the game personally. You go after me the same way every single game. Usually because I'm not playing up to BR standards, I don't even know what that means. I could see it starting as soon as you subbed in.
Come back! You're the only player willing to put up with my rampant, late-game conspiracy theories!FZ. wrote:![]()
I guess I'll leave then.
Bye
You don't? I wasn't silenced Night 3, and I said what I think about G-Man.Metalmarsh89 wrote:3) The post you responded to saying "I don't think you're interested." was a question to Epignosis that I want an answer to. Epignosis was silenced all day yesterday (so it appears), so I don't know what he thinks about G-Man.
Fair enough, I will let you be for now. I just don't understand what you are doing most of the time.Metalmarsh89 wrote:@Black Rock. The only defense I can offer is look at my post history.
1) I am doing something. The productivity or results may not please you, but I've done something.
2) Per Sloonei's thoughts, I went back and did a complete reread and observation of sig, and thought I brought up a very good point with regards to his recent interactions with Long Con. To sweep that under the rug and say I'm not doing anything is so cruel.![]()
3) The post you responded to saying "I don't think you're interested." was a question to Epignosis that I want an answer to. Epignosis was silenced all day yesterday (so it appears), so I don't know what he thinks about G-Man.
4) I've taken a bit of time to immerse myself into this game, but that doesn't make my early play completely irrelevant to this game.![]()
By the way, what part of Turnip Head's gameplay do you find good?
Nope! The images are piguid investigate contain insanified quotes by the person sponginess the image.Black Rock wrote:Gman, is any of your images important? I have images turned off right now because my wifi is crap. I prefer not to load them if they aren't relevant.
My point is that it's the same every game. You are totally different. I don't think my game play changes drastically every game.Metalmarsh89 wrote:Now wait just a minute. Aren't you accusing me of playing with a different style that you find unhelpful?Black Rock wrote:I hope you aren't taking this beyond the game personally. You go after me the same way every single game. Usually because I'm not playing up to BR standards, I don't even know what that means. I could see it starting as soon as you subbed in.
It's okay, Ceb18 it's Bean like Ninja panoplied expecting Ikkl Genius soundminded.Long Con wrote:Hey, gamers! I'm going away to a cottage until Sunday. I'm going to vote for G-Man right now since sig is off the poll (ha ha just kidding). I hope I don't get lynched while I'm gone, but if you have to do it, then so be it. Going away isn't a safety any more than getting silenced or insanified, so just play as you would... I just won't be able to respond to anything. It will probably be a relief to some of you for me to shut up for a bit.
Happy Mafia-ing! *votes G-Man* Sorry, friend.
Linki: MM, BR was talking to FZ. with that comment.
My plan is working as intended then.Black Rock wrote:My point is that it's the same every game. You are totally different. I don't think my game play changes drastically every game.Metalmarsh89 wrote:Now wait just a minute. Aren't you accusing me of playing with a different style that you find unhelpful?Black Rock wrote:I hope you aren't taking this beyond the game personally. You go after me the same way every single game. Usually because I'm not playing up to BR standards, I don't even know what that means. I could see it starting as soon as you subbed in.
This is the first time I've seen sig's name appear in LC's post history. It's an innocent looking exchange, very small and insignificant. That could be because they were trying to avoid any sort of connection in the thread early on. Or sig was simply a low contributor for a while and LC had no reason to talk to/about him.Long Con wrote:And what does her turning up Indy mean to you, following your train of thought here?sig wrote:Okay looked over both I will be sticking with SVS I can't get over that she voted for herself and I'm taking a gamble here but if she flips mafia I will think Cobalt is right about LC as well, if she flips Civ I would think Cobalt is mafia.
The thing about this being a "classic baddie move" is that it is also what civvies do. Discuss their top suspects in the thread and decide who to vote.FZ. wrote:Great result!![]()
If I had to choose a voter for Sig from his own team, it would be Splints. I read back through the last hours before the post, and she seemed the one leaving the options open. She talked about 3 potential candidates for a vote: Bass, Bubbles and Sig, threw in some few thoughts why Sig would be a good option, but kept her vote until it was basically a done deal. In my eyes, she was leaving open options and was even talking more about Bass, maybe to get people on board, and when nothing changed, she placed the vote on Sig. This to me, was a classic baddie move. Just wanted to get it out there.
No.Sloonei wrote:I demand rainbow lists from everybody ASAP.
Long ConSloonei wrote:That said, I wouldn't want to limit the discussion at all to just a few people. We've got 20+ suspects to choose from and everyone should be a topic of discussion, even DREAM. I demand rainbow lists from everybody ASAP.
superexcellence civvie:Sloonei wrote:That said, I wouldn't want to limit the discussion at all to just a few people. We've got 20+ suspects to choose from and everyone should be a topic of discussion, even DREAM. I demand rainbow lists from everybody ASAP.
OMG Merlin the Wizzard! I remember that dude!G-Man wrote:
Merlin the Wizzard
Usually just one time Black Rock Mad Hatter only one LaezyDaezy changes abatement run it through again.Black Rock wrote:I'm glad you're having fun Gman. How many times are you running it through the generator?
assemblyman you covered Sloonei!Sloonei wrote:This thread is too slow right now, it's almost like people have things to do on a Friday! i'd like to get home from work and see some progress has been made, so i'll play whatever part i can in making that happen.
Something that I've not done yet that we should all be doing is looking more closely at the votes from all three days. Not just who certain people voted for, but how they treated their votes and suspicions, what their behavior was like surrounding lynches, etc. I encourage anyone who can and wants to to take a look at some votes and end-of-day behavior and see what you can find.
Ok, just checking.G-Man wrote:Usually just one time Black Rock Mad Hatter only one LaezyDaezy changes abatement run it through again.Black Rock wrote:I'm glad you're having fun Gman. How many times are you running it through the generator?
revealed you happy saltpeter?
assemblyman you covered Sloonei!Sloonei wrote:This thread is too slow right now, it's almost like people have things to do on a Friday! i'd like to get home from work and see some progress has been made, so i'll play whatever part i can in making that happen.
Something that I've not done yet that we should all be doing is looking more closely at the votes from all three days. Not just who certain people voted for, but how they treated their votes and suspicions, what their behavior was like surrounding lynches, etc. I encourage anyone who can and wants to to take a look at some votes and end-of-day behavior and see what you can find.
Nobody intermittence me I couldn't run my posts through the insanifier more than once though. Red Queen I have Ela a few gynocracy moments.Black Rock wrote:Ok, just checking.G-Man wrote:Usually just one time Black Rock Mad Hatter only one LaezyDaezy changes abatement run it through again.Black Rock wrote:I'm glad you're having fun Gman. How many times are you running it through the generator?
revealed you happy saltpeter?
assemblyman you covered Sloonei!Sloonei wrote:This thread is too slow right now, it's almost like people have things to do on a Friday! i'd like to get home from work and see some progress has been made, so i'll play whatever part i can in making that happen.
Something that I've not done yet that we should all be doing is looking more closely at the votes from all three days. Not just who certain people voted for, but how they treated their votes and suspicions, what their behavior was like surrounding lynches, etc. I encourage anyone who can and wants to to take a look at some votes and end-of-day behavior and see what you can find.
You fail too often.G-Man wrote:ebwop: are you equivalence now?
Epignosis wrote:You fail too often.G-Man wrote:ebwop: are you equivalence now?
There were still some words that I think Golden figured out about the means of which Wildhorn could corrupt. It's still very much speculation on my part, but are we sure corrupting turns that playerbad? Or is corrupting more of a technique to cause little minor changes in behavior? Like changing their votes or speaking for them? I'll give more thought into it, but I am wondering what those words are in the middle of the PM that Golden thinks he solved.FZ. wrote:Scotty, you were the one most engaged in solving the PMs. What do you think about the corruption PM, if there really was one, and how does that influence what you think happened in the night regarding Sloonei.
Hahaha fair enough Bubbles. And i think I'll start calling Nijuu Ninja. (Sloonei's idea, not mine)TinyBubbles wrote:still got plenty of time so i'm reserving my vote until closer to the deadline, right now i'm thinking to vote long con though
gman has also been suspicious he hasn't seemed like his economics self, but being silenced/insanified makes me reluctant to post a vote there
there are a lot of silent people like sloonei said which makes it hard to get an impression of them either way, i don't like it though.
and epi's has been very quiet compared to earlier in the thread when he had a different role (if i recall correctly?) which is also making me wary
btw could you guys call me Bubbles or Tinybubbles, I don't like the acronym TB for reasons stated by Nijuukyugou!
There are many who call me Ninja BlooperScotty wrote:Hahaha fair enough Bubbles. And i think I'll start calling Nijuu Ninja. (Sloonei's idea, not mine)TinyBubbles wrote:still got plenty of time so i'm reserving my vote until closer to the deadline, right now i'm thinking to vote long con though
gman has also been suspicious he hasn't seemed like his economics self, but being silenced/insanified makes me reluctant to post a vote there
there are a lot of silent people like sloonei said which makes it hard to get an impression of them either way, i don't like it though.
and epi's has been very quiet compared to earlier in the thread when he had a different role (if i recall correctly?) which is also making me wary
btw could you guys call me Bubbles or Tinybubbles, I don't like the acronym TB for reasons stated by Nijuukyugou!
Very quiet.TinyBubbles wrote:and epi's has been very quiet compared to earlier in the thread when he had a different role (if i recall correctly?) which is also making me wary
Sloonei wrote:make more posts
Sloonei wrote:make more posts
Sloonei wrote:make more posts
Sloonei wrote:make more posts