Re: X-Men [Night 7]
Posted: Mon Apr 28, 2014 7:19 am
I picked Elohcin and Bullzeye.
Bullzeye is a cool name.
Bullzeye is a cool name.
So that would mean someone adopted the scum, scuminess language AND k4j refrained from using it at all since I didn't see it used by anyone but Exodus. Are you familiar with Occams Razor? Also, I'm not saying just because k4j is Exodus means Exodus is bad. Who votes for him is the tell.White Queen wrote:You don't think that someone could use jargon to fool people in a sock puppet setting? I know i have done so when playing a sock game. It is very possible that K4J is Exodus, but i am not sure why it is so sure that Exodus is the bad Gambit as opposed to the other Gambit.Longshot wrote:But Polaris, it is not common for any of the people on the list of the dead. It is only common to k4j. I understand they use it at mafiascum but we don't have any mafiascum players on the list of the dead. Exodus used the language. Exodus is dead. k4j uses that language. k4j is the only person on tht list that uses that language. Everyone on the list is dead, including k4j. k4j=Exodus.
So you think Bullz was Bastion? Or are you talking about Dazzler who was killed by both Sentinals and Sabretooth? Why do you think this?White Queen wrote:I think Roxy was Scarlet Witch, based on her wording. But I also have an idea who Bullz was, and I very much think he was on the civ side. He was NKed by The Sentinels, and Scarlet was NKed by Psylocke, who probably actually was Psylocke, IMO, not a Seemer.
I think I agree with AP - not sure of bullz, I may go sorsha. She doesnt have any votes so looks like a safe option. I'll go ahead and vote AP now and continue to think about the bottom selection.Hawkeye wrote:Perhaps Apocalypse needs a specific recruit. There was an instance somewhere where Apocalypse resurrects Mystique, Magneto and some other people to fight the Sentinels. Just throwing it out there. It might not be true.
I don't know about you people, but the only one on that list I'm 99% sure is a civilian, is AP.
Observe.
I do miss Bullz's insight though, but with all the weird speculations, I might want to be a bit cautious. For those still wondering: Dat behaviour spelling.![]()
Anyway, I think my votes will most likely go to AP and Bullz.
OCCAM'S RAZOR!White Queen wrote:Sorry I don't make sense to you, but I do make total sense to me, and that is all that mattersMikhail Rasputin wrote:Haha, this made me do this:The Vision wrote:I feel like he and Mikhail and just alpha-maling against each other, frankly.I don't usually think of myself as one to do that, but it seems strangely apt this game.
White Queen wrote:Wow, weird. Um, I think Roxy was Scarlet, and I did not totally trust her. So I am not going there. Why did you pick Boogs, Avalanche?
Based on what I thought about them, I went with Bullzeye & Sorsha. I am surprised one was playing, not the other so much. But I felt OK about both of them.This makes no sense. At all. Yes, k4j would clearly see through the bullshit if she were baddie, but she wouldn't tell us lol. And she's clearly Exodus, so that is a very bad move imo. Why even make up such a long-winded and improbable explanation that makes anyone but her Exodus? Occam's Razor. I've said it before and it seems like all say it all game long.White Queen wrote:I see that i did misread it; I switched to Bullzeye & K4J. I think K4J will see through the bullshit regardless of affiliation..
But I am not sure who so many people are confuzzled by the possibility of style disguising. If I were K4J, I would go out of my way to avoid using terminology unique to KSite players. Why do you think he would not do so? Or that others might not use his style to fool others? In other games, I have seen people use SVS's "~" as a disguise, why not the use of the word "scum"? Plus, I am more likely to think that Domino was bad, of the two Gambits, not Exodus.
Sunfire wrote:@ Mikhail - I'm sorry you see some of my posts as a bit uncaring. I do care. If you knew me personally you'd know that life circumstances have made me the type of person to say, "it is what it is" and move on to try to do better next time. Day 1 lynches are usually townies. Scum have the advantage early on in the game. They know who their teammates are and who is a townie. Of course there are independents but those are usually very few. Anyway, I am a realist and I don't ever expect to lynch scum on Day 1. This doesn't mean I am one of them.
Hawkeye used it more than once.Hawkeye wrote:I'll try to reply to everyone.
WQ: I was referring to baddies who can survive a night kill. In this game, there aren't any (that we know of). It works the other way around.
Havok: That may be in regards to Cyclops, but based on observation (of course, I could be wrong, I have been so many times in this game I lost count) I think he might have been detected by Xavier. It's not that difficult to find other two X-Men.
Longshot: I have briefly read your case, and honestly, it was just slightly better than SC's case on Exodus, and that has to be one of the weakest cases on someone I've ever read. (no offense, SC). I think Polaris made a similar point. Point 8 is worth taking into consideration. I personally have a hard time trying to figure out who is whose teammate. I am always surprised at the end of a game when the baddie team(s) is(are) revealed, and putting together a team like that surely raises an eyebrow.
Vision: Now that I think of it, I can see why he would vote for Marrow. I haven't looked at voting record, but she barely participates, yet always makes sure to cast a vote. It would be nice if you could use quotes to communicate, V.
Spiral: Thanks, dude, but we shouldn't spread the vote.
I guess it's down to Rasputin and Havok. Honestly, I think we're dealing with two independents here. I don't believe Rasputin is scum because of Night 4. I don't feel comfortable voting for either of them, but I don't want to spread the vote, so it's Havok.
Linki - I'm down for White Queen vote too.
I agree that boogs could easily be Domino. I'm thinking about voting sorsha for the second half of the list because she has not votes but as she has no votes I'm thinking theres no chance for her to win so idk. Circles.Havok wrote:One thing I don't think that we've discussed is why this 7? There have been 11 players either NKed or lynched in this game, so why are we choosing between only this lot?
5 players have been NKed in this game while 6 players have been lynched. If the top 4 on the poll are the lynched players, I would bet that Exodus and Domino are both represented there. k4j could very well be Exodus like is being discussed. If I had to guess, I would say that Boogs was Domino. Thinking back to Domino's posts, Boogs is a good match IMO. Therefore, I will likely vote for either Elohcin or A Person for the top portion of the poll.
I'm still contemplating the bottom half.
I wonder if some of the earlier deadies replaced back in to other roles, and thus are unavailable for rebirth?Havok wrote:One thing I don't think that we've discussed is why this 7? There have been 11 players either NKed or lynched in this game, so why are we choosing between only this lot?
5 players have been NKed in this game while 6 players have been lynched. If the top 4 on the poll are the lynched players, I would bet that Exodus and Domino are both represented there. k4j could very well be Exodus like is being discussed. If I had to guess, I would say that Boogs was Domino. Thinking back to Domino's posts, Boogs is a good match IMO. Therefore, I will likely vote for either Elohcin or A Person for the top portion of the poll.
I'm still contemplating the bottom half.
That's one of 2 players I have Boogs possibly being, fwiw.Havok wrote:Also, if Boogs was Domino, I think I need to rethink everything that I've put forth in this game so far. It would make so much sense for Domino to be the real Gambit if boogs was the player behind Domino.
The other one being?Mikhail Rasputin wrote:That's one of 2 players I have Boogs possibly being, fwiw.Havok wrote:Also, if Boogs was Domino, I think I need to rethink everything that I've put forth in this game so far. It would make so much sense for Domino to be the real Gambit if boogs was the player behind Domino.
Why is she safe because she has no votes?Longshot wrote: I think I agree with AP - not sure of bullz, I may go sorsha. She doesnt have any votes so looks like a safe option. I'll go ahead and vote AP now and continue to think about the bottom selection.
Except when it doesn't.Mikhail Rasputin wrote:
OCCAM'S RAZOR!
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Occam%27s_razor
I swear to you on everything sacred on this Earth, it works.
Yes. No one bad had voted for her.Spiral wrote:Why is she safe because she has no votes?Longshot wrote: I think I agree with AP - not sure of bullz, I may go sorsha. She doesnt have any votes so looks like a safe option. I'll go ahead and vote AP now and continue to think about the bottom selection.
He only said four things. First, he picked a random choice. Second, he said something silly. Third, I guess he missed the vote. Fourth, he voted somebody randomly again.Hawkeye wrote:I don't know about you people, but the only one on that list I'm 99% sure is a civilian, is AP.
Observe.
That is a very good point, Seb. The thing is while I would love to have Eloh, Boogs or K4J back, I would even agree with WQ that he could give the baddies a run for their money if I didn't believe he was actually one of them. Do I know he's actually Mystique? No. It's belief vs. knowledge. From what evidence we have at the moment I'm inclined to believe he was Mystique as Exodus. This does not mean I'm willing to take the risk and bring Domino back who could be either Eloh or Boogs. Bullz on the other hand had been active and offered great insight and from what we know had been targeted by both an independent and the baddies, so that is a risk I'm willing to take. I think this is a balanced choice.Sebastian Shaw wrote:He only said four things. First, he picked a random choice. Second, he said something silly. Third, I guess he missed the vote. Fourth, he voted somebody randomly again.Hawkeye wrote:I don't know about you people, but the only one on that list I'm 99% sure is a civilian, is AP.
Observe.
Even if he's good, Thunderbird wasn't very helpful. It looks like he didn't even want to play really.
Maybe the bad guys are voting for A Person because they know he won't try to find them.
I don't know these people very well, but if you figured out who Thunderbird was, couldn't you learn who Domino was? It's dangerous to bring back someone who wasn't helping us.Hawkeye wrote:That is a very good point, Seb. The thing is while I would love to have Eloh, Boogs or K4J back, I would even agree with WQ that he could give the baddies a run for their money if I didn't believe he was actually one of them. Do I know he's actually Mystique? No. It's belief vs. knowledge. From what evidence we have at the moment I'm inclined to believe he was Mystique as Exodus. This does not mean I'm willing to take the risk and bring Domino back who could be either Eloh or Boogs. Bullz on the other hand had been active and offered great insight and from what we know had been targeted by both an independent and the baddies, so that is a risk I'm willing to take. I think this is a balanced choice.Sebastian Shaw wrote:He only said four things. First, he picked a random choice. Second, he said something silly. Third, I guess he missed the vote. Fourth, he voted somebody randomly again.Hawkeye wrote:I don't know about you people, but the only one on that list I'm 99% sure is a civilian, is AP.
Observe.
Even if he's good, Thunderbird wasn't very helpful. It looks like he didn't even want to play really.
Maybe the bad guys are voting for A Person because they know he won't try to find them.
When you've been playing with some people for a while, you tend to notice their style, like WQ said. There will be some who might try to disguise themselves. I have figured most of you out by now, but I try not to let that affect the way I play, and I hope I'm not the only one. I'm playing with socks, not people.Deadpool wrote:uhhhhh hawkeye how do u know bullz was active and how do u know who targeted him, r u sayin u know bullz was dazzler?!????
and im thinkin elohcin was quiksilver maybe she can help us take out some of these cocky brotherhood mofos
I could figure most people out, but not all of them, so that is why I made those choices.Sebastian Shaw wrote: I don't know these people very well, but if you figured out who Thunderbird was, couldn't you learn who Domino was? It's dangerous to bring back someone who wasn't helping us.
I want to bring back someone who I am certain is a civilian, and I'm hoping he'll be responsible enough to help us go after the Brotherhood. Bullz will most definitely be helpful though.Sebastian Shaw wrote:You get a chance to bring back someone, and you bring back someone who doesn't help. The good guys deserve to lose.
No offense, Shaw, but you saying this is kind of funny.Sebastian Shaw wrote:You get a chance to bring back someone, and you bring back someone who doesn't help. The good guys deserve to lose.
Also, Shadowcat, Thunderbird was Forge and was lynched. So Sorsha can't be Forge, because Sorsha was in the NK group.Shadowcat wrote:I caught up last night (being silenced at this point in the game really sucks), but was too tired then to post anything. I was busy all day with crime-fighting stuff. It was a lot of information to digest, considering I couldn't comment throughout the day. But if anyone has any questions for me, I will be more than happy to answer them.
Also, as for the poll, I went ahead and voted A Person. I think him being Thunderbird makes the most sense. Still trying to decide on the bottom half. I must have missed it, but do we have any evidence that Sorsha could have been Forge?
Oh, then I must have misread something somewhere. I thought I saw someone mention that it was a possibility, but I might have mixed two things together.Mikhail Rasputin wrote:Also, Shadowcat, Thunderbird was Forge and was lynched. So Sorsha can't be Forge, because Sorsha was in the NK group.Shadowcat wrote:I caught up last night (being silenced at this point in the game really sucks), but was too tired then to post anything. I was busy all day with crime-fighting stuff. It was a lot of information to digest, considering I couldn't comment throughout the day. But if anyone has any questions for me, I will be more than happy to answer them.
Also, as for the poll, I went ahead and voted A Person. I think him being Thunderbird makes the most sense. Still trying to decide on the bottom half. I must have missed it, but do we have any evidence that Sorsha could have been Forge?
Yeah, fair enough. I was mostly giving you a hard time. He doesn't really go inactive, per se, he just plays almost as if he were. If that makes any sense.Polaris wrote:I only voted AP originally because that's the only player I knew in that list. I didn't realize he had a tendency to go inactive though, so I switched.
Yeah that's fine, just wanted to make sure there weren't misunderstandings.Shadowcat wrote:Oh, then I must have misread something somewhere. I thought I saw someone mention that it was a possibility, but I might have mixed two things together.Mikhail Rasputin wrote:Also, Shadowcat, Thunderbird was Forge and was lynched. So Sorsha can't be Forge, because Sorsha was in the NK group.Shadowcat wrote:I caught up last night (being silenced at this point in the game really sucks), but was too tired then to post anything. I was busy all day with crime-fighting stuff. It was a lot of information to digest, considering I couldn't comment throughout the day. But if anyone has any questions for me, I will be more than happy to answer them.
Also, as for the poll, I went ahead and voted A Person. I think him being Thunderbird makes the most sense. Still trying to decide on the bottom half. I must have missed it, but do we have any evidence that Sorsha could have been Forge?
Either way, I feel comfortable with my votes where they are.
What is this "patience" you are referring to? And how does one achieve it? :PEpignosis wrote:Expect the post around 8pm EST. Thank you for your patience.
What does that mean?Longshot wrote:Yes. No one bad had voted for her.Spiral wrote:Why is she safe because she has no votes?Longshot wrote: I think I agree with AP - not sure of bullz, I may go sorsha. She doesnt have any votes so looks like a safe option. I'll go ahead and vote AP now and continue to think about the bottom selection.
You're one to talk.Sebastian Shaw wrote:You get a chance to bring back someone, and you bring back someone who doesn't help. The good guys deserve to lose.
You're quite talkative since you almost got lynched.Sebastian Shaw wrote:I'm trying my best.
This person made 4 posts in 2 days. Will he read everything that's been going on?