Re: Downton Abbey Mafia (Night 7)
Posted: Sun May 01, 2016 10:47 pm
hey MM who would you vote for tommorw?Metalmarsh89 wrote:Dom, why did you vote for... nobody?
Murder, Mayhem, and Mafia
https://www.mafiathesyndicate.com/
hey MM who would you vote for tommorw?Metalmarsh89 wrote:Dom, why did you vote for... nobody?
I actually explained this already.Metalmarsh89 wrote:Dom, why did you vote for... nobody?
Youika wrote:hey MM who would you vote for tommorw?Metalmarsh89 wrote:Dom, why did you vote for... nobody?
thellama73 wrote:Epignosis would be a good place to look.Scotty wrote:Dammit. Sorry Nero. I came to my senses too late.
I think ika should be next to go. And I think at least a couple of those on the Nero train should be heavily looked at over the next few cycles.
Starting to be more unsure about Epi. I thought at first he and Polo could have had BTSC but his cases have been...bad, to say the least.
thellama73 wrote:You're so bad.Epignosis wrote:There's just such little participation here, it's difficult to work out anybody's opinions. I vote and make a case and people follow that.
THIS is why civilians lose. It isn't because of mechanics (most of the time) and it isn't because of balance (most of the time).
It's because civilians don't try.
Try goddamnit.
thellama73 wrote:Because Elohcin, when handing out roles for this game, randomly selected you to be a member of the mafia. That's why.Epignosis wrote:whythellama73 wrote:You're so bad.Epignosis wrote:There's just such little participation here, it's difficult to work out anybody's opinions. I vote and make a case and people follow that.
THIS is why civilians lose. It isn't because of mechanics (most of the time) and it isn't because of balance (most of the time).
It's because civilians don't try.
Try goddamnit.
thellama73 wrote:I do agree with Epi on one thing though, civilians need to stop blindly following him, because it has wrought nothing but civvie deaths so far.
thellama73 wrote:I'm dismayed at the number of people who are like "oops, okay, well Ika tomorrow" as you continue to let Epi lead you wherever he wants to.
thellama73 wrote:The main difference is that you are bad and I am not, though.Epignosis wrote:Can't blame spacedaisy for bad lynches anymore, so you're blaming me.thellama73 wrote:I do agree with Epi on one thing though, civilians need to stop blindly following him, because it has wrought nothing but civvie deaths so far.![]()
You voted DFaraday, Bubbles, spacedaisy, so that's three for you, Bucko.
thellama73 wrote:Well, that's certainly an opinion I don't share. The fact that you are good and experienced makes me distrust you.Epignosis wrote:And Edith implied that I'm not very good or experienced, so it would appear we both have a grievance with her ladyship.Dom wrote:Lady Edith is gravely mistaken about me, and I hope to show it to you.Epignosis wrote:I have already gone through Scotty's posts. I would consider voting there based on my analysis, although the Wilgy business gives me pause.
Thankfully no one silenced me, so I am able to examine everybody else I am considering voting. Once again, I'll take Lady Edith's advice and begin there.
If you're a civilian, I am willing to throw the game.Scotty wrote:thellama73 wrote:Epignosis would be a good place to look.Scotty wrote:Dammit. Sorry Nero. I came to my senses too late.
I think ika should be next to go. And I think at least a couple of those on the Nero train should be heavily looked at over the next few cycles.
Starting to be more unsure about Epi. I thought at first he and Polo could have had BTSC but his cases have been...bad, to say the least.thellama73 wrote:You're so bad.Epignosis wrote:There's just such little participation here, it's difficult to work out anybody's opinions. I vote and make a case and people follow that.
THIS is why civilians lose. It isn't because of mechanics (most of the time) and it isn't because of balance (most of the time).
It's because civilians don't try.
Try goddamnit.thellama73 wrote:Because Elohcin, when handing out roles for this game, randomly selected you to be a member of the mafia. That's why.Epignosis wrote:whythellama73 wrote:You're so bad.Epignosis wrote:There's just such little participation here, it's difficult to work out anybody's opinions. I vote and make a case and people follow that.
THIS is why civilians lose. It isn't because of mechanics (most of the time) and it isn't because of balance (most of the time).
It's because civilians don't try.
Try goddamnit.thellama73 wrote:I do agree with Epi on one thing though, civilians need to stop blindly following him, because it has wrought nothing but civvie deaths so far.thellama73 wrote:I'm dismayed at the number of people who are like "oops, okay, well Ika tomorrow" as you continue to let Epi lead you wherever he wants to.thellama73 wrote:The main difference is that you are bad and I am not, though.Epignosis wrote:Can't blame spacedaisy for bad lynches anymore, so you're blaming me.thellama73 wrote:I do agree with Epi on one thing though, civilians need to stop blindly following him, because it has wrought nothing but civvie deaths so far.![]()
You voted DFaraday, Bubbles, spacedaisy, so that's three for you, Bucko.thellama73 wrote:Well, that's certainly an opinion I don't share. The fact that you are good and experienced makes me distrust you.Epignosis wrote:And Edith implied that I'm not very good or experienced, so it would appear we both have a grievance with her ladyship.Dom wrote:Lady Edith is gravely mistaken about me, and I hope to show it to you.Epignosis wrote:I have already gone through Scotty's posts. I would consider voting there based on my analysis, although the Wilgy business gives me pause.
Thankfully no one silenced me, so I am able to examine everybody else I am considering voting. Once again, I'll take Lady Edith's advice and begin there.
Holy shit. I didn't realize llama's last 10 posts are all very decisive on Epi's badness. This started on day 5, in which Epi was taken off the poll for the second time of the game for some reason. I don't think Llama misplayed his role like Epi suggests, and actually would be flabbergasted if he didn't lie check Epi. I don't know what lie this would have been, but it would make sense.
Epi was one of the 3 names Wilgy listed as people he didn't trust before he was lynched.
So.
To me, this is pretty clear, and my earlier suspicions of Epi were not unfounded. I feel much better voting for Epi tomorrow. But only if Mrs Hughes is done having a nice laugh removing Epi from the poll, we can make stuff happen.
Dom, why are you defending Epi? If Epi flips bad, I could be in good conscience to lead a lynch on you based on these interactions I'm seeing
thellama73 wrote:Yes, I concur with this.DrWilgy wrote:I want reason for your Rab suspicion 1st if you can daisy.
Scotty is one I could easily see being bad. He's kept kind of a low profile this game.
Those 2 posts are the only things llama says about me when he votes me on Day 4. I can't imagine what he would have lie checked if that were the case.thellama73 wrote:I'm putting my vote on Scotty for now. The more I think about him, the more I suspect he's been flying under the radar this whole time.
thellama73 wrote:I'm going with Scotty again. A bit puzzled as to why the people who agreed with me yesterday have been shifting away from him.
Llama wonders why no one bit on his suspicion of me the day before, but after Matt reminds me that Wilgy trusted LoRab and me, he switches to Epi (if he could, which he couldn't, because Epi was removed from the poll). I would gander that at this point, llama hadn't lie checked Epi yet. It's not as decisive as his posting and immediate voting for Epi was at the beginning of Day 6.thellama73 wrote:Oh right. I'm voting for Epignosis then. I think he's playing a masterful game and playing us all for fools.Matt wrote:I think it was Day 2 when Wilgy pretty much cleared Scotty, and in later posts down the line, you can see Wilgy continue to say things like "Don't lynch Scotty!"thellama73 wrote:I'm going with Scotty again. A bit puzzled as to why the people who agreed with me yesterday have been shifting away from him.
Derp
Epignosis wrote:And like a hot chick at Comic-Con, he's barking up the wrong tree.
A thing.Epignosis wrote:Lorab, say a thing.
Well, did a quick comb through Epi's posts around Day 5, when llama would probably have checked something, since he came out so strong day 6, and I think this could fit the bill:Dom wrote:Scotty, which statement of Epi's do you think Logan checked?
Epi has played his cards close when it comes to divulging information about himself, so this little nugget could be exactly what llama would have needed.Epignosis wrote:Well I'm interested in lynching Mafia, not sig. So you can get on board with that, or I'm going to get on board with lynching you.
So you're saying you know that llama didn't log in at all during the night phase of day 5?Epignosis wrote:As for how I know it, I keep track of when you bitches last logged in. I pay attention to when Days end and Nights end. I see who was online during that window and who wasn't. Some people have not been using their roles.![]()
That's one big reason civilians lose, ika. They don't use their roles.
Did he?Dom wrote:Why did he get Sorsha lynched?
Epignosis wrote:At thirty-five posts, Sorsha will be the easiest place to begin.
Sorsha's first interaction is with ika, and is about ika's methods of catching mafia and policy lynches. That's five of her first six posts, or 14% of her total activity.
Her second interaction is with Silverwolf, expressing disagreement with her MM vote. That's the next three posts.
After briefly questioning thellama73 on what constitutes filler, Sorsha balks at the exchange between birdwithteeth11 and DFaraday, mother and son, respectively.
She answered Scotty's question about birdwithteeth11 in AWR or Recruitment, whichever it was.
Ultimately, Sorsha missed the Day 1 vote.
Sorsha's Day 2 activity consists of questions, a vote on Bubbles, and a response to a criticism from Long Con about low-hanging fruit.
Sorsha laments voting Bubbles, and says she didn't know bea was replacing in. I believe this: Sorsha didn't post at all after her Bubbles vote, and wasn't around when bea got replaced.
Sorsha laments being busy* and tired, says she trusts thellama73 and Scotty, and would consider voting spacedaisy (who was good). She doesn't get why Lorab is getting votes. She ultimately votes Long Con because of "gut," completely out of the Lorab / spacedaisy lynch (that sadly went to DFaraday).
*(Thank God I proofread- I had originally typed out "busty.")
Sorsha claims to have misread the doctor's role, which is believable, given that the doctor is a stopper, not a switcher.
Sorsha confesses to being busy in Spirited Away (where she was bad, working to put the final nail in the coffin for the civilians). She says she'd vote Bubbles over again and that she would devote more time to this after Spirited Away (a promise I don't think she's kept).
Day 4 she voted herself and vanished.
Day 5 she voted Nerolunar, commented that she could also vote ika, and vanished.
++++
I don't see anything here beyond laziness that makes me want to lynch Sorsha. She had 72 posts in Spirited Away, and that lasted eight phases. We're in the sixth, and she's at half that number. Perhaps I'm being naive, but if Sorsha were bad here, I don't think she'd be this lazy.
Moving on.
Black Rock wants to vote Sorsha and LC.Epignosis wrote:This was on my mind during the drive home.Scotty wrote:Yo.
I'm actually really perturbed by Lady Rose. Like, I have literally no idea what she is doing.
As far as we know, she has insanified Wilgy to speak in weird caps lock cipher, and just today, LC seems to be afflicted with the same stupid cipher.
Forgive my bluntness but if LC's insanity is legit, Lady Rose is inept. I mean come on:It's her choice to use her powers, but so far, that would mean she has done 2 insanifies in 5 cycles, and both times have been the exact same stupid insanity.She provides a bit of fun to the thread by insanifying a player each night with the insanity of her choice
This just seems too unlikely to be true.
I think LC is faking.
I would say Lady Rose is phoning it in big time. Sorsha and Lorab both fit that.
Epignosis wrote:Where you vote, I shall follow.
But not tonight. I'm tired and there is work tomorrow.
Epignosis wrote:I prefer a Long Con lynch to a Sorsha lynch myself, based on my reading. I will be around just before the deadline (and in the hour that comes before it).
Epignosis wrote:Would you object if I voted Long Con at this stage after all?Black Rock wrote:Matt. I really don't think Illyria is bad. Epignosis has stated this and I trust him this game. Might be the only one ever in my life, but I do. Vote Sorsha with me. Don't give the baddies another option.Matt wrote:Laaaame. Getting rid of a...mostly...inactive instead of she-who-is-a-proven-liar?
C'mon town, you're better then this!
Followed by:Epignosis wrote:Long Con
That might as well have been in scum chat.Epignosis wrote:Sorsha
You should have gone for the tie.
But I appreciate how adamantly you are questioning the validity of the evidence before you.Dom wrote:Why did he get Sorsha lynched?
Tone. If I'm wrong I'll be super pissed at myself.Scotty wrote:But I appreciate how adamantly you are questioning the validity of the evidence before you.Dom wrote:Why did he get Sorsha lynched?
What specifically makes you think Epi is good in the wake of what I have presented?
At some point you have to separate tone and actions. Lenny from 'Of Mice and Men' was very kind to that rabbit before snapping its neck.Dom wrote:Tone. If I'm wrong I'll be super pissed at myself.Scotty wrote:But I appreciate how adamantly you are questioning the validity of the evidence before you.Dom wrote:Why did he get Sorsha lynched?
What specifically makes you think Epi is good in the wake of what I have presented?
Question: how was Epis laziness vote for her different than the case against her?
3 times? I thought it was only 2Matt wrote:RIP Llama
If Epi is mafia and he's been taken off the poll 3 times then hahaha that's pretty funny. Deeeeerp.
AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAEpignosis wrote:As for how I know it, I keep track of when you bitches last logged in. I pay attention to when Days end and Nights end. I see who was online during that window and who wasn't. Some people have not been using their roles.![]()
That's one big reason civilians lose, ika. They don't use their roles.
http://www.mafiathesyndicate.com/member ... file&u=410ika wrote:That beign said, i think epi is jsut making bullshit about knowing who's on and who's not, its very easy to put on invisible mode to hide yourself and unless he has powers to bypass that (and if he does and uses it i would call that cheating for using something only he can get that others can not). and even then i think its a stretch
Epignosis wrote:http://www.mafiathesyndicate.com/member ... file&u=410ika wrote:That beign said, i think epi is jsut making bullshit about knowing who's on and who's not, its very easy to put on invisible mode to hide yourself and unless he has powers to bypass that (and if he does and uses it i would call that cheating for using something only he can get that others can not). and even then i think its a stretch
Joined:
Thu Jun 04, 2015 7:29 pm
Last visited:
Mon May 02, 2016 10:58 am
Nothing powerful about it.
The simple answer here is: neither of us exist.ika wrote:Epignosis wrote:http://www.mafiathesyndicate.com/member ... file&u=410ika wrote:That beign said, i think epi is jsut making bullshit about knowing who's on and who's not, its very easy to put on invisible mode to hide yourself and unless he has powers to bypass that (and if he does and uses it i would call that cheating for using something only he can get that others can not). and even then i think its a stretch
Joined:
Thu Jun 04, 2015 7:29 pm
Last visited:
Mon May 02, 2016 10:58 am
Nothing powerful about it.
didnt change my point that if one thinks town loses based on PR or lack of results of PR play is silly. town at its core is nothign more then town vs mafia and town should only need the power of the lynch
Turf Wars, ika insisted we kill Silverwolf. MCS, ika insisted his team kill Silverwolf.ika wrote:And I didn't want scums to nk silver. But it sucks we can't have everything we like.Dom wrote:I don't want Rob to die.
Absolutely not either of them. Is this your way of kicking open the door and announcing you are Mafia?ika wrote:so prob epi and dom?
IKR??Dom wrote:It's cute that it's you and Scotty.ika wrote:so prob epi and dom?
I concur.Epignosis wrote:Yeah, I like it too. He's probably right.ika wrote:i like how dom tries to discret the confirmed town with a simple "oh he was blackmailed"
That is my list as well.Metalmarsh89 wrote:Youika wrote:hey MM who would you vote for tommorw?Metalmarsh89 wrote:Dom, why did you vote for... nobody?
Or Scotty.
Or Matt.
Epignosis has been removed from the lynch poll three times now. Either he his mafia and has blackmailed that role three times now and succeeded, he is mafia and some civilian trusts him enough to keep removing him for no particular reason, or he's a civilian. I believe it is the final of these three options.
Or Mrs Hughes knows something you do not.Scotty wrote:Holy shit. I didn't realize llama's last 10 posts are all very decisive on Epi's badness. This started on day 5, in which Epi was taken off the poll for the second time of the game for some reason. I don't think Llama misplayed his role like Epi suggests, and actually would be flabbergasted if he didn't lie check Epi. I don't know what lie this would have been, but it would make sense.
Epi was one of the 3 names Wilgy listed as people he didn't trust before he was lynched.
So.
To me, this is pretty clear, and my earlier suspicions of Epi were not unfounded. I feel much better voting for Epi tomorrow. But only if Mrs Hughes is done having a nice laugh removing Epi from the poll, we can make stuff happen.
Dom, why are you defending Epi? If Epi flips bad, I could be in good conscience to lead a lynch on you based on these interactions I'm seeing
*gags*Metalmarsh89 wrote:Anyone want to try some of this watermelon lime ale I'm drinking?
I am totally down with that.Epignosis wrote:Right now, I think Matt and ika need to be lynched.
OR you have missed something.Scotty wrote:I have backed down from this earlier because Epi has been removed from the poll twice and has been backed up by Black Rock and Dom for his supposed "civ play". Epi doesn't even believe in meta gaming, so at some point, what separates his civ play from his Mafia play? Mrs Hughes has BTSC with another civ, so agreement among two people that otherwise know nothing does not a clean person make. People make mistakes.
You are my pick for the second Mafia once Epi flips bad fyiIllyria wrote:Absolutely not either of them. Is this your way of kicking open the door and announcing you are Mafia?ika wrote:so prob epi and dom?
IKR??Dom wrote:It's cute that it's you and Scotty.ika wrote:so prob epi and dom?
I concur.Epignosis wrote:Yeah, I like it too. He's probably right.ika wrote:i like how dom tries to discret the confirmed town with a simple "oh he was blackmailed"![]()
That is my list as well.Metalmarsh89 wrote:Youika wrote:hey MM who would you vote for tommorw?Metalmarsh89 wrote:Dom, why did you vote for... nobody?
Or Scotty.
Or Matt.
Epignosis has been removed from the lynch poll three times now. Either he his mafia and has blackmailed that role three times now and succeeded, he is mafia and some civilian trusts him enough to keep removing him for no particular reason, or he's a civilian. I believe it is the final of these three options.![]()
Or Mrs Hughes knows something you do not.Scotty wrote:Holy shit. I didn't realize llama's last 10 posts are all very decisive on Epi's badness. This started on day 5, in which Epi was taken off the poll for the second time of the game for some reason. I don't think Llama misplayed his role like Epi suggests, and actually would be flabbergasted if he didn't lie check Epi. I don't know what lie this would have been, but it would make sense.
Epi was one of the 3 names Wilgy listed as people he didn't trust before he was lynched.
So.
To me, this is pretty clear, and my earlier suspicions of Epi were not unfounded. I feel much better voting for Epi tomorrow. But only if Mrs Hughes is done having a nice laugh removing Epi from the poll, we can make stuff happen.
Dom, why are you defending Epi? If Epi flips bad, I could be in good conscience to lead a lynch on you based on these interactions I'm seeing
*gags*Metalmarsh89 wrote:Anyone want to try some of this watermelon lime ale I'm drinking?
No..... No thank you. Very kind of you to offer.
I am totally down with that.Epignosis wrote:Right now, I think Matt and ika need to be lynched.![]()
OR you have missed something.Scotty wrote:I have backed down from this earlier because Epi has been removed from the poll twice and has been backed up by Black Rock and Dom for his supposed "civ play". Epi doesn't even believe in meta gaming, so at some point, what separates his civ play from his Mafia play? Mrs Hughes has BTSC with another civ, so agreement among two people that otherwise know nothing does not a clean person make. People make mistakes.
Also, Ika why DID you vote for Llama???
Scotty wrote:You are my pick for the second Mafia once Epi flips bad fyiIllyria wrote:Absolutely not either of them. Is this your way of kicking open the door and announcing you are Mafia?ika wrote:so prob epi and dom?
IKR??Dom wrote:It's cute that it's you and Scotty.ika wrote:so prob epi and dom?
I concur.Epignosis wrote:Yeah, I like it too. He's probably right.ika wrote:i like how dom tries to discret the confirmed town with a simple "oh he was blackmailed"![]()
That is my list as well.Metalmarsh89 wrote:Youika wrote:hey MM who would you vote for tommorw?Metalmarsh89 wrote:Dom, why did you vote for... nobody?
Or Scotty.
Or Matt.
Epignosis has been removed from the lynch poll three times now. Either he his mafia and has blackmailed that role three times now and succeeded, he is mafia and some civilian trusts him enough to keep removing him for no particular reason, or he's a civilian. I believe it is the final of these three options.![]()
Or Mrs Hughes knows something you do not.Scotty wrote:Holy shit. I didn't realize llama's last 10 posts are all very decisive on Epi's badness. This started on day 5, in which Epi was taken off the poll for the second time of the game for some reason. I don't think Llama misplayed his role like Epi suggests, and actually would be flabbergasted if he didn't lie check Epi. I don't know what lie this would have been, but it would make sense.
Epi was one of the 3 names Wilgy listed as people he didn't trust before he was lynched.
So.
To me, this is pretty clear, and my earlier suspicions of Epi were not unfounded. I feel much better voting for Epi tomorrow. But only if Mrs Hughes is done having a nice laugh removing Epi from the poll, we can make stuff happen.
Dom, why are you defending Epi? If Epi flips bad, I could be in good conscience to lead a lynch on you based on these interactions I'm seeing
*gags*Metalmarsh89 wrote:Anyone want to try some of this watermelon lime ale I'm drinking?
No..... No thank you. Very kind of you to offer.
I am totally down with that.Epignosis wrote:Right now, I think Matt and ika need to be lynched.![]()
OR you have missed something.Scotty wrote:I have backed down from this earlier because Epi has been removed from the poll twice and has been backed up by Black Rock and Dom for his supposed "civ play". Epi doesn't even believe in meta gaming, so at some point, what separates his civ play from his Mafia play? Mrs Hughes has BTSC with another civ, so agreement among two people that otherwise know nothing does not a clean person make. People make mistakes.
Also, Ika why DID you vote for Llama???
No... you misunderstood my comment. Epig's reason for voting Sorsha was her laziness.Scotty wrote:At some point you have to separate tone and actions. Lenny from 'Of Mice and Men' was very kind to that rabbit before snapping its neck.Dom wrote:Tone. If I'm wrong I'll be super pissed at myself.Scotty wrote:But I appreciate how adamantly you are questioning the validity of the evidence before you.Dom wrote:Why did he get Sorsha lynched?
What specifically makes you think Epi is good in the wake of what I have presented?
Question: how was Epis laziness vote for her different than the case against her?
How was Epi's laziness vote for Sorsha different than the case against her?
What was lazy about it? Did he say somewhere it was a lazy vote? Because nothing about his vote seemed lazy. It happened like 1-2 minutes before the deadline. It almost seemed spiteful.
Why did Sorsha vote Illyria instead of LC? LC had 3 votes- 1 of which was Epi- while Illyria had 3 votes, 1 of which was LC. Epi could have sent Illyria home, but his defense of that checks out in that he believed Illyria to be good. So it would make sense for him to vote Sorsha to save Illyria.
I don't view this as a lazy vote, because a lazy vote would have been for LC, where he left it. No, this was a calculated vote.
You shouldn't use that in the future.Epignosis wrote:I think Epignosis has always assumed something about member profiles that turns out to be incorrect.
cuteScotty wrote: You are my pick for the second Mafia once Epi flips bad fyi
Yes, he was. But if he was looking for BTSC, there are three groups two civ, one mafia so just because he found someone who had BTSC does not mean he found Mafia. Yes, he cleared Scotty and I do not know him well enough to say he would cause shenanigans for the lulz. There are a few roles that can influence people so there is a possibility of his checks being skewed.Matt wrote:Wilgy was a btsc checker tho, right? If he essentially cleared Scotty, which it seems he did, then that would mean his assumed btsc check on Scotty came out negative.
Unless you believe there were shenanigans involving either Wilgy's assumed btsc check OR Wilgy was just causing shenanigans himself.
Epi, when Sorsha was lynched, you had your vote on Long Con before you moved it last second, right?
I'm confused here. I'm asking about Scotty, not anyone else. It looks like you are defending Epi, possibly others, from being on Wilgy's list, and I agree even if he checked them and the check came out positive, does not mean they are bad.Illyria wrote:Yes, he was. But if he was looking for BTSC, there are three groups two civ, one mafia so just because he found someone who had BTSC does not mean he found Mafia. Yes, he cleared Scotty and I do not know him well enough to say he would cause shenanigans for the lulz. There are a few roles that can influence people so there is a possibility of his checks being skewed.Matt wrote:Wilgy was a btsc checker tho, right? If he essentially cleared Scotty, which it seems he did, then that would mean his assumed btsc check on Scotty came out negative.
Unless you believe there were shenanigans involving either Wilgy's assumed btsc check OR Wilgy was just causing shenanigans himself.
Epi, when Sorsha was lynched, you had your vote on Long Con before you moved it last second, right?
Sorry.Matt wrote:I'm confused here. I'm asking about Scotty, not anyone else. It looks like you are defending Epi, possibly others, from being on Wilgy's list, and I agree even if he checked them and the check came out positive, does not mean they are bad.Illyria wrote:Yes, he was. But if he was looking for BTSC, there are three groups two civ, one mafia so just because he found someone who had BTSC does not mean he found Mafia. Yes, he cleared Scotty and I do not know him well enough to say he would cause shenanigans for the lulz. There are a few roles that can influence people so there is a possibility of his checks being skewed.Matt wrote:Wilgy was a btsc checker tho, right? If he essentially cleared Scotty, which it seems he did, then that would mean his assumed btsc check on Scotty came out negative.
Unless you believe there were shenanigans involving either Wilgy's assumed btsc check OR Wilgy was just causing shenanigans himself.
Epi, when Sorsha was lynched, you had your vote on Long Con before you moved it last second, right?
But why is Scotty on your list of people you want to lynch? If he checked Scotty, and then came to the thread "DON'T LOOK AT SCOTTY!", then the check came out negative. Meaning no btsc.
Why are people looking at Scotty? For the love of everything, whyyyyyyy?
That is correct. And it would have stayed there, I will admit, until Sorsha moved her vote.Matt wrote:Wilgy was a btsc checker tho, right? If he essentially cleared Scotty, which it seems he did, then that would mean his assumed btsc check on Scotty came out negative.
Unless you believe there were shenanigans involving either Wilgy's assumed btsc check OR Wilgy was just causing shenanigans himself.
Epi, when Sorsha was lynched, you had your vote on Long Con before you moved it last second, right?