Re: Downton Abbey Mafia (Day 8)
Posted: Tue May 03, 2016 10:33 am
No 

Murder, Mayhem, and Mafia
https://www.mafiathesyndicate.com/
[VOTE:Matt wrote:Sucks Dom's off the poll today. Hrm.
On Day 4, Dom addresses Sorsha for the first time (also the first time he makes any mention of her at all) with the following...
Dom never follows up on this, just a fun little poke at her I guess. Anywho...Dom wrote:Your team?Sorsha wrote:Well I'm here... The Mafia gods sent someone to pound on my front door so I wouldn't miss the vote.
Wilgy is bad?
On Day 5, Dom's second post about Sorsha (the first post, if you recall right up there, he questions Sorsha if her team got her to come vote), Dom seems to discredit Nero's suss on Sorsha because it's his "first post on Sorsha" (lol) and wants to know why Nero dropped suss of sig and Lorab...but you can read it I guess in it's entirety...
On Day 6, Dom's third post about Sorsha in the entire game...Dom wrote:This is your first post about Sorsha. Why did you drop sig and LoRab?Nerolunar wrote:Yuck, people are voting for me.
Im getting suspicious of Sorsha. She is wallflowering and it doesn´t look good. Matt is also being weird - Im leaning scum on these two.
Tbh I find it weird that Wilgy listed me. I don´t have BTSC with anyone of any alignment. I think it was more of a scum read from him, and not an indicator of how his role worked out.
So like, first post he seems to mildy suspect Sorsha based on his question to her, or it was just a joke? Not sure.Dom wrote:Tomorrow I might.Scotty wrote:Dom, would you vote for Sorsha?
Second post, it seems like he's discrediting Nero's suss of Sorsha because it's his "first post" on her. But then again, that's how I see it, how does everyone else interpret Dom's second post about Sorsha in the game?
Third post, he says "tomorrow I might [VOTE: ". Haha. Why Dom, that was literally your third post on Sorsha, the first of which you sussed her and the second of which you seemed to try and discredit a suss on her.
Let's get Dom on Day 9.] aubergine
Here's a hypothetical. If you were blackmailed to vote a certain way, would you believe that the way you were told to vote is bad, or looks better for it?Epignosis wrote:Scotty, is there a reason you mentioned trusting MetalMarsh89 more? I noticed he voted for Lorab when Lorab was supposed to be lynched, but now is voting for me.
I don't remember.Epignosis wrote:Also, Scotty, you voted spacedaisy instead of Lorab Day 3. Why?
It would depend. I've seen mafia members target one another with their own abilities plenty of times for the purpose of looking better.Scotty wrote:Here's a hypothetical. If you were blackmailed to vote a certain way, would you believe that the way you were told to vote is bad, or looks better for it?Epignosis wrote:Scotty, is there a reason you mentioned trusting MetalMarsh89 more? I noticed he voted for Lorab when Lorab was supposed to be lynched, but now is voting for me.
I don't remember.Epignosis wrote:Also, Scotty, you voted spacedaisy instead of Lorab Day 3. Why?
Not a clue. Not epignosis.Scotty wrote:Dom, who are you planning to vote for?
I'm laughing at myself for actually thinking that this was Wednesday when I looked at the poll. I'll move my vote off you.Epignosis wrote:The Day phase ends tomorrow. I'm not completely sure my vote is going to stay where it is, and I think making turning this into a dilemma for the other voters (Epi or Lorab) is dangerous and premature. I intend to work things out as much as I can, and then encourage people to vote the person I think is bad.
Why is everyone calling me a groundhog lately? I'm not remotely a groundhog.Scotty wrote:Note that I did a complete 180 turnaround from my night case against Epi, and not voting him.
MM, why are you voting Epi? You've given less on the matter than Phil the Groundhog cares about seeing his shadow every year.
Excellent question, MM?Scotty wrote:Note that I did a complete 180 turnaround from my night case against Epi, and not voting him.
MM, why are you voting Epi? You've given less on the matter than Phil the Groundhog cares about seeing his shadow every year.
Also, Epignosis channeling his inner JaggedJimmyJay right here. Epignosis is obviously mafia.Epignosis wrote:The Day phase ends tomorrow. I'm not completely sure my vote is going to stay where it is, and I think making turning this into a dilemma for the other voters (Epi or Lorab) is dangerous and premature. I intend to work things out as much as I can, and then encourage people to vote the person I think is bad.
I slowed the train down way before you voted Epi unannounced, so find that as suspicious as you want- you voting him has no bearing on my opinion.Metalmarsh89 wrote:Why is everyone calling me a groundhog lately? I'm not remotely a groundhog.Scotty wrote:Note that I did a complete 180 turnaround from my night case against Epi, and not voting him.
MM, why are you voting Epi? You've given less on the matter than Phil the Groundhog cares about seeing his shadow every year.
I think today's the day to vote for Epignosis. I found ika's case very convincing. I might switch before the day is over unless the lynch ends up being somewhat unanimous.
Why did you do a complete 180 on Epignosis last night? I find it suspicious that you no longer suspect him the day I decide to vote for him.
I'm still stewing about who would be nuts enough to kill Long Con when he was on his way to the gallows the next Day.Dom wrote:I haven't left any breadcrumbs.
Rob, why Matt?
As much as I would love to lynch ika out of principle, I am hesitant. I think he genuinely does not give a toss.Dom wrote:What about Ika?
Ika has been suspicious since Day 1 and has avoided lynch after lynch.... what do you think?
You're absolutely right. I think this lynch is critical. I do not think you are bad. I do not think Illyria is bad. I don't think ika is bad, though I do want to lynch him because he's being unhelpful.Dom wrote:That might be true. But that's also why this discussion is important.
The one that has stuck out is that Wilgy implied he didn't have BTSC. But what if there was a redirect that effected his information? Or what if we're misinterpreting his posts? And yes, I realize the same could be said for his posts about me--but I think there are other reasons to see that I'm not bad.Dom wrote:LoRab, what do you think of the points about it being unlikely that Scotty is bad?
Read any of my defense posts, in which I talk about points that have been made that others have found suspicious.Dom wrote:What are the reasons you're not bad?
Then why wouldn't the mafia just kill you?LoRab wrote:Not sure how to answer that without info dumping. But it's an assumption I'm making based on my own knowledge.
The problem with this argument, is this is exactly what Sorsha did too. She voted off of several bandwagons, and she had Matt defending against her lynch, though I guess in this case I don't think he is a civilian.LoRab wrote:Read any of my defense posts, in which I talk about points that have been made that others have found suspicious.Dom wrote:What are the reasons you're not bad?
And, I'm not bad because the role I was sent isn't a bad role.
But, really, because I've been doing my best to help the civies. I haven't jumped on a number of the lynch trains that have formed. I did have a lynch train formed against me--which at least 1 civie thought was BS based on the fact that I was saved. And I'll make that 2 civies that thought it was BS because of Wilgy (even though no role is infallible, as I point out above).
Yeah that's WIFOM. :PLoRab wrote:Also, and I know this is WIFOM, but look at the kills. Do those really look like choices that I would advocate? Even knowing that any 1 baddie only has so much of a voice on a team, I don't think any of the choices are ones with which I would remotely agree to.
And I also know that the baddies probably know my role by now and would be quite happy to lynch me. So, the fact that people keep mentioning my name for amorphous reasons--some of those folks have to be bad and are trying to keep things in that direction.
So you've been voting for Epi thid phase and yet also suspect Matt is bad and now also suspect LoRab? There's only 2 bad guys you knowMetalmarsh89 wrote:The problem with this argument, is this is exactly what Sorsha did too. She voted off of several bandwagons, and she had Matt defending against her lynch, though I guess in this case I don't think he is a civilian.LoRab wrote:Read any of my defense posts, in which I talk about points that have been made that others have found suspicious.Dom wrote:What are the reasons you're not bad?
And, I'm not bad because the role I was sent isn't a bad role.
But, really, because I've been doing my best to help the civies. I haven't jumped on a number of the lynch trains that have formed. I did have a lynch train formed against me--which at least 1 civie thought was BS based on the fact that I was saved. And I'll make that 2 civies that thought it was BS because of Wilgy (even though no role is infallible, as I point out above).
Speaking of redirects, what if the mafia got a hold of a lynch switch the day you were supposed to be lynched. You said we can't be sure about Scotty because of the potential for redirects, but we also can't be sure that a civilian switched the lynch from you.
Yeah that's WIFOM. :PLoRab wrote:Also, and I know this is WIFOM, but look at the kills. Do those really look like choices that I would advocate? Even knowing that any 1 baddie only has so much of a voice on a team, I don't think any of the choices are ones with which I would remotely agree to.
And I also know that the baddies probably know my role by now and would be quite happy to lynch me. So, the fact that people keep mentioning my name for amorphous reasons--some of those folks have to be bad and are trying to keep things in that direction.
I don't konw what their nk priorities or strategy has been. But they seem to have been doing a great job controlling all of the lynches except for 1, so I'd argue that they're using lynches as kills.Epignosis wrote:Then why wouldn't the mafia just kill you?LoRab wrote:Not sure how to answer that without info dumping. But it's an assumption I'm making based on my own knowledge.
The only thing that's been brought against me is my votes. I've explained all my votes. Without saying what I've said, I'm not sure how to defend. How would you have me defend?Metalmarsh89 wrote:The problem with this argument, is this is exactly what Sorsha did too. She voted off of several bandwagons, and she had Matt defending against her lynch, though I guess in this case I don't think he is a civilian.LoRab wrote:Read any of my defense posts, in which I talk about points that have been made that others have found suspicious.Dom wrote:What are the reasons you're not bad?
And, I'm not bad because the role I was sent isn't a bad role.
But, really, because I've been doing my best to help the civies. I haven't jumped on a number of the lynch trains that have formed. I did have a lynch train formed against me--which at least 1 civie thought was BS based on the fact that I was saved. And I'll make that 2 civies that thought it was BS because of Wilgy (even though no role is infallible, as I point out above).
Speaking of redirects, what if the mafia got a hold of a lynch switch the day you were supposed to be lynched. You said we can't be sure about Scotty because of the potential for redirects, but we also can't be sure that a civilian switched the lynch from you.
Yeah that's WIFOM. :PLoRab wrote:Also, and I know this is WIFOM, but look at the kills. Do those really look like choices that I would advocate? Even knowing that any 1 baddie only has so much of a voice on a team, I don't think any of the choices are ones with which I would remotely agree to.
And I also know that the baddies probably know my role by now and would be quite happy to lynch me. So, the fact that people keep mentioning my name for amorphous reasons--some of those folks have to be bad and are trying to keep things in that direction.
Where's Epi on your list? Since your vote is on him, I'm going to assume he's a red, as well.Metalmarsh89 wrote:But here, I'll post a special rainbow list for today.
Dom
Illyria
Scotty
Lorab
ika
Matt
After the Game of Champions, I would never believe this line for a second, ever!Matt wrote:If I were teamies with Sorsha, I wouldn't be able to bring myself to shout in the thread "LAAAAME DON'T LYNCH SORSHA LYNCH SOMEONE ELSE"...I'm too much of a scaredy cat.
Oops, I can't believe I forgot to put him on there.Matt wrote:Where's Epi on your list? Since your vote is on him, I'm going to assume he's a red, as well.Metalmarsh89 wrote:But here, I'll post a special rainbow list for today.
Dom
Illyria
Scotty
Lorab
ika
Matt
Why do you have Dom in green, what do you think of Dom not mentioning Sorsha until day 4, and when he does, his order goes "joke about Sorsha being on a team", "discredit Nero's suss of Sorsha", "suss Sorsha"...1 2 3.
Quick story from GoC...Metalmarsh89 wrote:After the Game of Champions, I would never believe this line for a second, ever!Matt wrote:If I were teamies with Sorsha, I wouldn't be able to bring myself to shout in the thread "LAAAAME DON'T LYNCH SORSHA LYNCH SOMEONE ELSE"...I'm too much of a scaredy cat.
Soooo....?Metalmarsh89 wrote:Oops, I can't believe I forgot to put him on there.Matt wrote:Where's Epi on your list? Since your vote is on him, I'm going to assume he's a red, as well.Metalmarsh89 wrote:But here, I'll post a special rainbow list for today.
Dom
Illyria
Scotty
Lorab
ika
Matt
Why do you have Dom in green, what do you think of Dom not mentioning Sorsha until day 4, and when he does, his order goes "joke about Sorsha being on a team", "discredit Nero's suss of Sorsha", "suss Sorsha"...1 2 3.
Re-reading this, this is not true.Matt wrote:For real, especially with Sorsha's non play this game, I would've bussed her ass to the moon if we were teamies.