The Syndicate

Glad we got a baddie! I still think that Gman would have been a good lynch too

Metalmarsh89 wrote:

fingersplints wrote:I voted and then saw this post.

Epignosis wrote:However this goes, I would advise against ending the Day in a tie.

I just made it a tie

Do whatever the hell you want.

Why does Epignosis have to determine your vote behavior. Is he a civilian?

Umm. I did whatever the hell I wanted? Kind of a weird reaction from you. When did I say Epi decided my behavior? In that post it's clear I am doing the opposite of what he wants.

I have no idea if he is a civilian or not

Golden wrote:I actually initially read that post from splints as not giving a damn what epi had to say lol

This.

Les Mis I'm voting here because I love this musical. I love the story. I love the songs. I love the revolving stage. I love all of it

fingersplints wrote:
Les Mis I'm voting here because I love this musical. I love the story. I love the songs. I love the revolving stage. I love all of it

You do realize you're voting for most annoying musical out of the 2, right?

Golden wrote:@G-Man - I wasn't happy until you insanified the dark tower, and then I was happy.

Long days and pleasant nights.

There is so much more that I would have liked to run through the insanifier had I not been so darn busy. I've ALWAYS wanted to run literature through that thing. I'm glad I got the chance. Thank you again to the keeper of the insanity!

Golden wrote:Btw, anyone else think that this...

G-Man wrote:

Epignosis wrote:Bada-bing.

How's that LC-sig teammate theory working out for you? :P

Sounds like a man who was ready to gloat about everyone being wrong that LC was on his team?

Nope, I was just calling Epi out on what I viewed as his hypocrisy of being so sure of himself about the LC-Sig-et al. teammate theory, turning out to be totally wrong, but still spiking the football after the lynch result was a good one anyway. Sloonei and Scotty had much more honest and humble reactions that Mr. Pink:

Scotty wrote:Holy shit. That went...better than expected!

Sloonei wrote:

G-Man wrote:

Epignosis wrote:Bada-bing.

How's that LC-sig teammate theory working out for you? :P

lol, i totally fell ass backwards into this one. that was the entire basis of my suspicion.

Maybe I misinterpreted his short post but in my view, you don't get to be wrong about a lynch result and still brag about said lynch result.

My theory, however, that at least one of Long Con, Cobalt, and Golden being a baddie is now 100% correct. So... boo-ya!

Scotty wrote:

Golden wrote:

Scotty wrote:Yeah, I have the whole thing solved except for one or two words. And those one or two words hint at how that baddie can corrupt. Grrr I'll keep giving it thought...

I think I have the bit you are referring to, I'm only missing the first sentence. I don't think it gives us much about 'how' - even solved, the words seem intentionally vague.

I'm wondering what the unclear words are people are referring to, and if they are the words I found hardest to solve. The word before the brackets took me a while, but when I solved it I realised it was flavour text.

I wanna speculate on this again. I asked Dom if it was ok, and again, as long as it doesn't copy and paste word for word what you find, it will count as "speculation". So like, I know that:
-Wildhorn's team kills on even nights (tonight).
-He [could have] corrupted one of Merrily, Primrose, or Whistle.

Here's what I'm unclear on still Golden. When he selects someone at night, he does [something]. I'm still missing those few words, and even though it's probably vague, it might help in figuring this thing out.

If we can nip this in the bud whether or not someone already has been corrupted, then this PM can be null and void.

I have as much revealed as you have. And either I am missing words in the location you have described, or it is intentionally vague.

Scotty wrote:

fingersplints wrote:
Les Mis I'm voting here because I love this musical. I love the story. I love the songs. I love the revolving stage. I love all of it

You do realize you're voting for most annoying musical out of the 2, right?

Obviously not lol

Scotty wrote:

Spoiler: show

Metalmarsh89 wrote:

Scotty wrote:When I asked for help in decoding the Day 0 PM, you basically did nothing of help:

Metalmarsh89 wrote:

Scotty wrote:I REALLY want to hear more from row 3. So...calling MM, sig, njuu, nutella, and Turnip! Anything to report??

All systems go.

I'm glad your bodily functions and neural pathways are working properly, robot man.

Metalmarsh89 wrote:

Scotty wrote:So MM, I'm not sure why you're being mum and unhelpful. Do you WANT me to be suspicious of you?

Not at all. All I want is to lynch Long Con.

I think I have been quite helpful and have offered some keen observations.

So in response to my plea for help with the PM, you disregard it with a vague statement. Can you help me with pointing to what help you've brought to the discussion pertaining to the PM? Because I may have missed it somewhere...

While I haven't offered anything related to the PM's I have participated this game otherwise and done exactly what I said I've done.

Scotty wrote:Listen, it's is your prerogative if you don't feel that sharing that info with the group is beneficial to the civ game. But I'm under the impression that more info is a good thing that can help in deductions. Because we're all sorta in the dark here. Does it maybe help the mafia too? Probably. But I think the benefit is greater for res to have the info, and by withholding that info without cause or concern is truly suspicious from my point of view.

I don't understand the accusation here. Is it even one? I don't think I know anything that hasn't already been shared.

---I wasn't referring to your supposed helpfulness throughout the first few days in your reads. My point is that you haven't shared your thoughts on really anything that had to do with any PMs, ever. I was hoping for a reason--any reason; you just glossed over it after I specifically asked for input. Like, even saying something like "I don't feel comfortable discussing my thoughts in the forum because I think it might give mafia a leg-up." Now you aren't the only person to ignore that phase of discussions, but whereas someone like TurnipHead has been MIA, you actually responded with a non-answer of "all systems go," as if that's helpful in any capacity. It makes you appear dodgy as balls.

Well as I've just stated, I have solved the PM with the tildes and the Wheel of Fortune letters, but it appears I was way behind a few other players in doing so.

I don't believe in stifling discussion, I just don't really have anything to say.

Metalmarsh89 wrote:

Scotty wrote:

Golden wrote:

Scotty wrote:Yeah, I have the whole thing solved except for one or two words. And those one or two words hint at how that baddie can corrupt. Grrr I'll keep giving it thought...

I think I have the bit you are referring to, I'm only missing the first sentence. I don't think it gives us much about 'how' - even solved, the words seem intentionally vague.

I'm wondering what the unclear words are people are referring to, and if they are the words I found hardest to solve. The word before the brackets took me a while, but when I solved it I realised it was flavour text.

I wanna speculate on this again. I asked Dom if it was ok, and again, as long as it doesn't copy and paste word for word what you find, it will count as "speculation". So like, I know that:
-Wildhorn's team kills on even nights (tonight).
-He [could have] corrupted one of Merrily, Primrose, or Whistle.

Here's what I'm unclear on still Golden. When he selects someone at night, he does [something]. I'm still missing those few words, and even though it's probably vague, it might help in figuring this thing out.

If we can nip this in the bud whether or not someone already has been corrupted, then this PM can be null and void.

I have as much revealed as you have. And either I am missing words in the location you have described, or it is intentionally vague.

OK. Thanks for your attempt at helping, MM!
See? Was that so hard?

While I have you: I did not anticipate how bad LC was, so I'm backing off my recent suspicions of you, MM. I'm just going to attribute them to my assumption that everyone was gung-ho about the PMs as much as I was So right now, I have you back at neutral. Maybe independent.

linki- I see that. At least you aren't posting stream of conscious famous speeches through the insanifier. That would be pretty stifling.
My frustration was that I didn't KNOW you had solved it. You didn't say anything about it really, just meandered around it. That's why I jumped on you. But again, I'm backing off and attributing that just to how you play. Good read on LC

Scotty wrote:OK. Thanks for your attempt at helping, MM!
See? Was that so hard?

While I have you: I did not anticipate how bad LC was, so I'm backing off my recent suspicions of you, MM. I'm just going to attribute them to my assumption that everyone was gung-ho about the PMs as much as I was So right now, I have you back at neutral. Maybe independent.

linki- I see that. At least you aren't posting stream of conscious famous speeches through the insanifier. That would be pretty stifling.
My frustration was that I didn't KNOW you had solved it. You didn't say anything about it really, just meandered around it. That's why I jumped on you. But again, I'm backing off and attributing that just to how you play. Good read on LC

I love puzzles. At one point, I said I was going to go solve it (when I was home and could), but after I did, it seemed to be a moot point since I missed the discussion on it.

If you think it will help us catch any baddies, my ears are open. But I feel like the only thing it tells us about that is that there may be one more baddie than is listed in the role list. Oh, and I guess we know who attempted to kill Golden, which Epignosis already has a theory about that.

I wonder if these polls dictate which PM Dom sends us? Interestingly enough, the "Do you want to read from a book" poll only had one person voting 'no'. And that was Epi.

Epi, did you receive a PM Night 2 pertaining to a book? If so, what was it? Was it any different than what the rest of us received?

Might not be a bad idea to split up on this poll so we have multiple interpreters if we receive different messages.

I wasn't going to vote because I don't know anything about either of these musicals.

I mean, I don't necessarily think it's going to kill you, MM. I don't realllllllly like to read, but I picked it in that poll because I thought that would lead to a PM.

Scotty wrote:I mean, I don't necessarily think it's going to kill you, MM. I don't realllllllly like to read, but I picked it in that poll because I thought that would lead to a PM.

Don't jinx me!

Bumping this for my sake.

Hey Dom, any chance this could be listed on the first page somewhere up top? Please and thanks.

Metalmarsh89 wrote:Post links for assistance.



Bass_the_Clever Posts
birdwithTeeth11 (Replaced by FZ.) Posts/Posts
Black Rock Posts
Bullzeye Posts
Cobalt Posts
Devin the Omniscient Posts
DFaraday Posts
Dragon D. Luffy (Replaced by Canucklehead) Posts/Posts
DREAM Posts
Epignosis Posts
fingersplints Posts
Golden Posts
Gumshoe Posts
Hedgeowl Posts
Long Con Posts
MetalMarsh89 Posts
MovingPictures07 (Replaced by Epignosis 2.0) Posts/Posts
Neverwhere Posts
nijuukyugou Posts
nutella Posts
Scotty Posts
sig Posts
Sloonei Posts
S~V~S Posts
timmer Posts
TinyBubbles Posts
Turnip Head Posts
XthAtGAm3RGuYX (Replaced by G-Man) Posts/Posts

Wow, that's great. I was really nervous.

Does it matter to anyone who's on who's team?

Bass, what was up with your vote for Nutella? Why didn't you vote for any of the two top candidates? Did you really not find any of them suspicious?

FZ. wrote: Does it matter to anyone who's on who's team?

Does it not matter to you?

Sloonei wrote:

FZ. wrote: Does it matter to anyone who's on who's team?

Does it not matter to you?

No. I just want to make sure you weren't recruited. Can you assure that?

HahahahahahahahahaHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

I WANT KISSES ON MY FEET FROM THE BITCHES WHO WENT FOR ME ON THE BASIS OF ME TUNNELING ON LONG CON

I GOT MY SALTY REVENGE AND he was scum.

Slay.

Will y'all continue to doubt my instincts and integrity or can some of you get off my dick now?

I'm hungover and working. I'll post some reads when I get home later.

Sloonei wrote:

Hedgeowl wrote:Wow, Skeptical me is always surprised when we actually lynch a baddie. LC I will say you put up an admiral defense and points to you for surviving for so long under Day 0? 1? suspicion.

Voting Miss Saigon as well.

ugh, Dom the worst feeling. Hope you recover quickly. We have plenty to talk about until then.

Hell yeah RE: LC. Dude was under attack for no real reason from the moment we started but still managed to last 4 days. That's impressive.

WHATS IMPRESSIVE IS THAT NOBODY FUCKING LISTENED TO ME EVEN WHEN HE SURVIVED MY FORCED LYNCH ON HIM DAY TWO GO DIE IN A FIRE SCUMNEI

Cobalt wrote:HahahahahahahahahaHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

I WANT KISSES ON MY FEET FROM THE BITCHES WHO WENT FOR ME ON THE BASIS OF ME TUNNELING ON LONG CON

I GOT MY SALTY REVENGE AND he was scum.

Slay.

Will y'all continue to doubt my instincts and integrity or can some of you get off my dick now?

I'm hungover and working. I'll post some reads when I get home later.

I don't think I ever called you a baddie

FZ. wrote:

Cobalt wrote:HahahahahahahahahaHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

I WANT KISSES ON MY FEET FROM THE BITCHES WHO WENT FOR ME ON THE BASIS OF ME TUNNELING ON LONG CON

I GOT MY SALTY REVENGE AND he was scum.

Slay.

Will y'all continue to doubt my instincts and integrity or can some of you get off my dick now?

I'm hungover and working. I'll post some reads when I get home later.

I don't think I ever called you a baddie

And I wasn't subtweeting you in particular in that post so.

In briefly from work. BIH Long Con!! Picking Miss Saigon, it's easily the more annoying of the two.

I chose Le miserable to even the poll. But I also like the music. Sew me.

Oh wait, I got it all wrong

FZ. wrote:Oh wait, I got it all wrong

I just changed mine. Glad I am not alone though lol

LOL, I still want to even the poll, so I left it there

FZ. wrote:

Sloonei wrote:

FZ. wrote: Does it matter to anyone who's on who's team?

Does it not matter to you?

No. I just want to make sure you weren't recruited. Can you assure that?

i can tell you i wasn't, will you take my word for it?

Sloonei wrote:

FZ. wrote:

Sloonei wrote:

FZ. wrote: Does it matter to anyone who's on who's team?

Does it not matter to you?

No. I just want to make sure you weren't recruited. Can you assure that?

i can tell you i wasn't, will you take my word for it?

Sure I will...when hell freezes over.

What would you think reading that story? Based on the PMs from night 0, do you think it's a likely scenario?

Sorry I missed the vote! No excuse, just forgot.
Good job, LC hounders. Of the two, I would probably have vote G-Man, I haven't really been too convinced by any of the LC cases, but obviously I've been wrong. Whoops.

Cobalt wrote:HahahahahahahahahaHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

I WANT KISSES ON MY FEET FROM THE BITCHES WHO WENT FOR ME ON THE BASIS OF ME TUNNELING ON LONG CON

I GOT MY SALTY REVENGE AND he was scum.

Slay.

Will y'all continue to doubt my instincts and integrity or can some of you get off my dick now?

I'm hungover and working. I'll post some reads when I get home later.

I voted for Long Con before you did.

Cobalt wrote:WHATS IMPRESSIVE IS THAT NOBODY FUCKING LISTENED TO ME EVEN WHEN HE SURVIVED MY FORCED LYNCH ON HIM DAY TWO GO DIE IN A FIRE SCUMNEI

Calm down. Stop yelling. There's still 5-6 baddies left to lynch.

I voted for Miss Saigon because I've never heard of it before and I thought the recent musical-film adaptation of Les Mis was excellent.

Not to mention this gem:




Also, Cobalt- simmer down now. No need to be so crass.

FZ. wrote:

Sloonei wrote:

FZ. wrote:

Sloonei wrote:

FZ. wrote: Does it matter to anyone who's on who's team?

Does it not matter to you?

No. I just want to make sure you weren't recruited. Can you assure that?

i can tell you i wasn't, will you take my word for it?

Sure I will...when hell freezes over.

What would you think reading that story? Based on the PMs from night 0, do you think it's a likely scenario?

For me specifically to have been corrupted? It's not a completely unlikely scenario, but I'd say I only have as much of a chance of being corrupted as everyone else, if that's even a thing in this game. My interpretation of last night's message was that I was the attempted kill and the two hooded figures had nothing to do with me. Depending on which team was doing the kill that night, it would especially make little sense for the same team to try to do both things to me on the same night.
Do you have any particular reason not to trust me right now?

Cobalt wrote:

Sloonei wrote:

Hedgeowl wrote:Wow, Skeptical me is always surprised when we actually lynch a baddie. LC I will say you put up an admiral defense and points to you for surviving for so long under Day 0? 1? suspicion.

Voting Miss Saigon as well.

ugh, Dom the worst feeling. Hope you recover quickly. We have plenty to talk about until then.

Hell yeah RE: LC. Dude was under attack for no real reason from the moment we started but still managed to last 4 days. That's impressive.

WHATS IMPRESSIVE IS THAT NOBODY FUCKING LISTENED TO ME EVEN WHEN HE SURVIVED MY FORCED LYNCH ON HIM DAY TWO GO DIE IN A FIRE SCUMNEI

Are you trying to accuse me of being scum again?

Cobalt wrote:HahahahahahahahahaHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

I WANT KISSES ON MY FEET FROM THE BITCHES WHO WENT FOR ME ON THE BASIS OF ME TUNNELING ON LONG CON

I GOT MY SALTY REVENGE AND he was scum.

Slay.

Will y'all continue to doubt my instincts and integrity or can some of you get off my dick now?

I'm hungover and working. I'll post some reads when I get home later.

No, because it was a baseless salt vote. You got lucky.

Cobalt wrote:HahahahahahahahahaHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

I WANT KISSES ON MY FEET FROM THE BITCHES WHO WENT FOR ME ON THE BASIS OF ME TUNNELING ON LONG CON

I GOT MY SALTY REVENGE AND he was scum.

Slay.

Will y'all continue to doubt my instincts and integrity or can some of you get off my dick now?

I'm hungover and working. I'll post some reads when I get home later.

I will trust your instincts when you prove that that was not just blind luck. Who else is scum, oh wise one? Long Con can't hurt you anymore.

Sloonei wrote:So my phone is now completely dead and my laptop has a tendency to crash if it's on for more than a couple of hours at a time. I'll try to get the phone thing fixed as soon as possible, but until then my participation might be a little down. As you can see, I take very good care of my technology.

This problem has been fixed.

Sloonei wrote:

FZ. wrote:

Sloonei wrote:

FZ. wrote:

Sloonei wrote:

FZ. wrote: Does it matter to anyone who's on who's team?

Does it not matter to you?

No. I just want to make sure you weren't recruited. Can you assure that?

i can tell you i wasn't, will you take my word for it?

Sure I will...when hell freezes over.

What would you think reading that story? Based on the PMs from night 0, do you think it's a likely scenario?

For me specifically to have been corrupted? It's not a completely unlikely scenario, but I'd say I only have as much of a chance of being corrupted as everyone else, if that's even a thing in this game. My interpretation of last night's message was that I was the attempted kill and the two hooded figures had nothing to do with me. Depending on which team was doing the kill that night, it would especially make little sense for the same team to try to do both things to me on the same night.
Do you have any particular reason not to trust me right now?

I don't have any reason to not trust you right now, but I disagree that you have as much chance of being corrupted as anyone. If I had the power to corrupt any player I wanted, I'd choose the most trusted, and I think that's you. You wouldn't have to change your game much, so I don't know if we would be seeing it, especially not immediately. It's not like I plan on voting for you, but I think we can't ignore the option, especially in light of that PM and the fact that the two hooded guys high fived each other.

So I'm keeping all options open

FZ. wrote:

Sloonei wrote:

FZ. wrote:

Sloonei wrote:

FZ. wrote:

Sloonei wrote:

FZ. wrote: Does it matter to anyone who's on who's team?

Does it not matter to you?

No. I just want to make sure you weren't recruited. Can you assure that?

i can tell you i wasn't, will you take my word for it?

Sure I will...when hell freezes over.

What would you think reading that story? Based on the PMs from night 0, do you think it's a likely scenario?

For me specifically to have been corrupted? It's not a completely unlikely scenario, but I'd say I only have as much of a chance of being corrupted as everyone else, if that's even a thing in this game. My interpretation of last night's message was that I was the attempted kill and the two hooded figures had nothing to do with me. Depending on which team was doing the kill that night, it would especially make little sense for the same team to try to do both things to me on the same night.
Do you have any particular reason not to trust me right now?

I don't have any reason to not trust you right now, but I disagree that you have as much chance of being corrupted as anyone. If I had the power to corrupt any player I wanted, I'd choose the most trusted, and I think that's you. You wouldn't have to change your game much, so I don't know if we would be seeing it, especially not immediately. It's not like I plan on voting for you, but I think we can't ignore the option, especially in light of that PM and the fact that the two hooded guys high fived each other.

So I'm keeping all options open

I have no problem with this. I was refraining on commenting on this theory since you first brought it up because I wanted to see how others reacted to it. So far I've got nothing but solid town vibes from you, on this issue and from your posts as a whole. Your skepticism and open-mindedness are excellent.
If I've been corrupted in any way, I was not notified.

I trust Sloonei because he did not replace Turnip Head this game.

I understand the intent to lynch G-Man tomorrow, but I hope that is not the only thing we will discuss.

Metalmarsh89 wrote:I understand the intent to lynch G-Man tomorrow, but I hope that is not the only thing we will discuss.

Ditto.

Updated

Dom wrote: Lloyd Webber – Baddie Team 1 (4 Roles)
Win Condition: Outnumber the civilians and eliminate Team Wildhorn and any other opposition, if it exists.
Sir Andrew Lloyd Webber
The Phantom of the Opera – The Phantom of the Opera is there, inside my mind.
Starlight Express - Starlight express, answer me yes
Cats - Memory, all alone in the moonlight

Wildhorn – Baddie Team 2 (3 Roles)
Win Condition: Outnumber the civilians and eliminate Team Lloyd Weber and any other opposition, if it exists.
Frank Wildhorn
Jekyll & Hyde - If I could reach you, if I could guide and teach you
Bonnie and Clyde – I’d rather breathe in life than dusty air.

Independents (4 Roles)
Andrew Lippa – And we were having a wild, wild party!
Stephen Schwartz – I’ve gotta be someone who lives all of his life in superlatives.
Oscar Hammerstein II – Some enchanted evening, you may find a stranger.
Richard Rodgers –If I loved you, time and again, I would try to say all I'd want you to know

Scotty wrote:I wonder if these polls dictate which PM Dom sends us? Interestingly enough, the "Do you want to read from a book" poll only had one person voting 'no'. And that was Epi.

Epi, did you receive a PM Night 2 pertaining to a book? If so, what was it? Was it any different than what the rest of us received?

That was Night 1 and old me died.

Scotty wrote:

Golden wrote:

Scotty wrote:Yeah, I have the whole thing solved except for one or two words. And those one or two words hint at how that baddie can corrupt. Grrr I'll keep giving it thought...

I think I have the bit you are referring to, I'm only missing the first sentence. I don't think it gives us much about 'how' - even solved, the words seem intentionally vague.

I'm wondering what the unclear words are people are referring to, and if they are the words I found hardest to solve. The word before the brackets took me a while, but when I solved it I realised it was flavour text.

I wanna speculate on this again. I asked Dom if it was ok, and again, as long as it doesn't copy and paste word for word what you find, it will count as "speculation". So like, I know that:
-Wildhorn's team kills on even nights (tonight).
-He [could have] corrupted one of Merrily, Primrose, or Whistle.

Here's what I'm unclear on still Golden. When he selects someone at night, he does [something]. I'm still missing those few words, and even though it's probably vague, it might help in figuring this thing out.

If we can nip this in the bud whether or not someone already has been corrupted, then this PM can be null and void.

Is the word you are looking for 'targets'? It honestly doesn't say anything that he does. He just selects (targets) them.

Scotty wrote:I wonder if these polls dictate which PM Dom sends us? Interestingly enough, the "Do you want to read from a book" poll only had one person voting 'no'. And that was Epi.

Epi, did you receive a PM Night 2 pertaining to a book? If so, what was it? Was it any different than what the rest of us received?

Might not be a bad idea to split up on this poll so we have multiple interpreters if we receive different messages.

The epi that voted no was NKed, so I'm guessing he would have got whatever MP voted for.

linki - ninjad

Working on some vote analysis but it is Daddy-Daughter time. Be back after Fancy Nancy, Color Wonder, dinner, Dairy Queen, and bedtime stories.

Epignosis wrote:

Scotty wrote:I wonder if these polls dictate which PM Dom sends us? Interestingly enough, the "Do you want to read from a book" poll only had one person voting 'no'. And that was Epi.

Epi, did you receive a PM Night 2 pertaining to a book? If so, what was it? Was it any different than what the rest of us received?

That was Night 1 and old me died.

Oh man, i'm getting confused with what info you know and don't know, Epi.

Golden wrote:

Scotty wrote:

Golden wrote:

Scotty wrote:Yeah, I have the whole thing solved except for one or two words. And those one or two words hint at how that baddie can corrupt. Grrr I'll keep giving it thought...

I think I have the bit you are referring to, I'm only missing the first sentence. I don't think it gives us much about 'how' - even solved, the words seem intentionally vague.

I'm wondering what the unclear words are people are referring to, and if they are the words I found hardest to solve. The word before the brackets took me a while, but when I solved it I realised it was flavour text.

I wanna speculate on this again. I asked Dom if it was ok, and again, as long as it doesn't copy and paste word for word what you find, it will count as "speculation". So like, I know that:
-Wildhorn's team kills on even nights (tonight).
-He [could have] corrupted one of Merrily, Primrose, or Whistle.

Here's what I'm unclear on still Golden. When he selects someone at night, he does [something]. I'm still missing those few words, and even though it's probably vague, it might help in figuring this thing out.

If we can nip this in the bud whether or not someone already has been corrupted, then this PM can be null and void.

Is the word you are looking for 'targets'? It honestly doesn't say anything that he does. He just selects (targets) them.

No, I'm talking about right after that. something xxxxx xxxxxx

anyone have a theory as to why we received the message we received on Night 1? We seem to all agree that it's a role that does something to one of those three other roles, but why were we told about that role specifically?

Well you know what would be interesting, Sloonei?
I hadn't thought of this before. If Dom isn't randomly sending out roles, then maybe he's sending out ones that fit together?
There were 4 unique PMs for Day 1, right? Well, there are 4 independents. 1 was seemingly obviously pertaining to one of the independents. Maybe the other 3 are as well?

And the book reading PM (we can say it's about Wildhorn, just can't copy and paste) was a baddie.

Maybe Dom is systematically revealing the abilities of bad roles.

As for corruption, I'm still uncertain, but I would assume every night LC had a chance to pick a player he thought was one of the 3 plays, and if he guesses right they're corrupted in whatever capacity that means.

Scotty wrote:No, I'm talking about right after that. something xxxxx xxxxxx

I can't guarantee I'm right, but what I have is 'might happen'.

I think LC only had two chances. Night one and night 3.

I think there is a decent chance he was successful on night 3 (hence the hooded figures).

I also think there is a high chance that 'corrupt' = 'recruit' because of the asymmetric construction of the mafia teams. It's a common approach I've seen used before (and in fact I think I've used it myself).