The Syndicate

Posted: **Wed Oct 26, 2016 8:30 pm**

Sloonei wrote:zebra, who would you prefer: INH or indiglo? Your MP vote isn't doing much right now. I'd definitely like him to be a bigger topic of discussion tomorrow though.

Ask whoever my replacement is.

Posted: **Wed Oct 26, 2016 8:32 pm**

Sorry, I just...need to leave. Maybe not forever but I'm not making any promises.

Posted: **Wed Oct 26, 2016 8:33 pm**

Just so it's said, all of you (and I really do mean ALL of you) have been great and this has been fun for me. My life just can't handle this anymore.

Posted: **Wed Oct 26, 2016 8:34 pm**

ur the best zebra, I hope you're well. Forever.

Posted: **Wed Oct 26, 2016 8:36 pm**

Sloonei wrote:We seem to agree on the 4 main candidates, motel room. I propose we sit here twiddling our thumbs until someone else comes along.

I got two thumbs and a heart.

Posted: **Wed Oct 26, 2016 8:38 pm**

I am ill and at work and bye Zebra

Posted: **Wed Oct 26, 2016 8:41 pm**

a2thezebra wrote:Just so it's said, all of you (and I really do mean ALL of you) have been great and this has been fun for me. My life just can't handle this anymore.

Posted: **Wed Oct 26, 2016 8:45 pm**

Hi Glorf, Hi Mac. Wanna help us break this tie?

Posted: **Wed Oct 26, 2016 8:49 pm**

I have a bad feeling.

I'm going to stand my ground wrt the vote so that I'm one less unknown when its 1 minute away from lynch ok

Posted: **Wed Oct 26, 2016 8:50 pm**

IF we are 2 minutes from the deadline and we're still tied I'll switch to Indi just to avoid a tie if I have to. I don't want to get to that.

Posted: **Wed Oct 26, 2016 8:51 pm**

Sloonei wrote:Hi Glorf, Hi Mac. Wanna help us break this tie?

Hey, Sloonei

What the hell have I walked into? I was leaning towards INH yesterday and was hoping that he'd return today to answer the comments I put to him last night. I don't know what the fact that he hasn't returned says...

Posted: **Wed Oct 26, 2016 8:53 pm**

Glorfindel wrote:
Sloonei wrote:Hi Glorf, Hi Mac. Wanna help us break this tie?
Hey, Sloonei What the hell have I walked into? I was leaning towards INH yesterday and was hoping that he'd return today to answer the comments I put to him last night. I don't know what the fact that he hasn't returned says...

I'm not 100% sold on him and to be honest, I am genuinely concerned for his state of mind after yesterday's events

Posted: **Wed Oct 26, 2016 8:54 pm**

Glorfindel wrote:
Glorfindel wrote:
Sloonei wrote:Hi Glorf, Hi Mac. Wanna help us break this tie?
Hey, Sloonei What the hell have I walked into? I was leaning towards INH yesterday and was hoping that he'd return today to answer the comments I put to him last night. I don't know what the fact that he hasn't returned says...
I'm not 100% sold on him and to be honest, I am genuinely concerned for his state of mind after yesterday's events

Regardless, time is running out and we need to come to a decision. It's him or indiglo at this point. You hold a lot of power here, use it wisely!

Posted: **Wed Oct 26, 2016 8:55 pm**

Glorfindel wrote:
Glorfindel wrote:
Sloonei wrote:Hi Glorf, Hi Mac. Wanna help us break this tie?
Hey, Sloonei What the hell have I walked into? I was leaning towards INH yesterday and was hoping that he'd return today to answer the comments I put to him last night. I don't know what the fact that he hasn't returned says...
I'm not 100% sold on him and to be honest, I am genuinely concerned for his state of mind after yesterday's events

You're his only solid scum read.

Posted: **Wed Oct 26, 2016 8:55 pm**

Indiglo is another that I recall had 'issues' but I'm not sure why. She replaced BWT and I have no clue why he was seen as suspicious

Posted: **Wed Oct 26, 2016 8:57 pm**

3 minutes

Posted: **Wed Oct 26, 2016 8:57 pm**

If I have to make a choice, I have to go with someone that I think has at least some kind of case against them.

Posted: **Wed Oct 26, 2016 8:58 pm**

Oh lame

Posted: **Wed Oct 26, 2016 8:58 pm**

oh hi wilgy

Posted: **Wed Oct 26, 2016 8:58 pm**

No ties. I didn't even get to catch up tho...

Posted: **Wed Oct 26, 2016 8:58 pm**

Glorfindel wrote:If I have to make a choice, I have to go with someone that I think has at least some kind of case against them.

No one will be lynched then dragonslayer

Posted: **Wed Oct 26, 2016 8:58 pm**

okay guess I don't have to now

Posted: **Wed Oct 26, 2016 8:59 pm**

Mac, you gonna decide this for us?

Posted: **Wed Oct 26, 2016 8:59 pm**

I actually trust the wagon without Lorab and sloon on it more.

Changed my vote.

Posted: **Wed Oct 26, 2016 9:00 pm**

MacDougall wrote:okay guess I don't have to now

Yes you do

Posted: **Wed Oct 26, 2016 9:00 pm**

Hi again Wilgy.

linki: no he doesn't, apparently.

Posted: **Wed Oct 26, 2016 9:00 pm**

Glorf almost tied it and had to change it again.

Posted: **Wed Oct 26, 2016 9:00 pm**

DrWilgy wrote:I actually trust the wagon without Lorab and sloon on it more.

Changed my vote.

Am I back in your bad graces?

Posted: **Wed Oct 26, 2016 9:01 pm**

ok fuck

Posted: **Wed Oct 26, 2016 9:02 pm**

I am noting Mac's unparticipation in this lynch.

Posted: **Wed Oct 26, 2016 9:03 pm**

Sloonei wrote:
DrWilgy wrote:I actually trust the wagon without Lorab and sloon on it more.

Changed my vote.
Am I back in your bad graces?

You were never out of my bad graces and I still gth you bad. While I didn't want to vote with you, it's better than a tie.

For safe keeping I'll notate my vote record this phase. I was on INH, changed to Indiglo and changed back to INH all within 3 min to prevent a tie.

Posted: **Wed Oct 26, 2016 9:05 pm**

DrWilgy wrote:Glorf almost tied it and had to change it again.

My vote BROKE the tie and put INH ahead 5 votes to 4 - what on earth is going on here?

Posted: **Wed Oct 26, 2016 9:06 pm**

DrWilgy wrote:
Sloonei wrote:
DrWilgy wrote:I actually trust the wagon without Lorab and sloon on it more.

Changed my vote.
Am I back in your bad graces?
You were never out of my bad graces and I still gth you bad. While I didn't want to vote with you, it's better than a tie.

For safe keeping I'll notate my vote record this phase. I was on INH, changed to Indiglo and changed back to INH all within 3 min to prevent a tie.

DrWilgy wrote:
Quin wrote:
DrWilgy wrote:@Sloonei I gut read you as bad from me due to a feeling of dancing around the pizza last night. A forced non-grasping of the Rico situation. This is heavily dependent upon other's alignements though.

@Sprityo I gut read you due to your request of wishing to team with Mac following mine.

@Lorab, yes that is what I stated. Your point?
What's your view on Sloonei now that you have an alignment to work with?
Sloonei is no longer on my baddiedar.

Losing track of your fake reads, Doctor?

Posted: **Wed Oct 26, 2016 9:06 pm**

Glorfindel wrote:
DrWilgy wrote:Glorf almost tied it and had to change it again.
My vote BROKE the tie and put INH ahead 5 votes to 4 - what on earth is going on here?

you guys appeared to vote simultaneously.

Posted: **Wed Oct 26, 2016 9:09 pm**

Sloonei wrote:
DrWilgy wrote:
Sloonei wrote:
DrWilgy wrote:I actually trust the wagon without Lorab and sloon on it more.

Changed my vote.
Am I back in your bad graces?
You were never out of my bad graces and I still gth you bad. While I didn't want to vote with you, it's better than a tie.

For safe keeping I'll notate my vote record this phase. I was on INH, changed to Indiglo and changed back to INH all within 3 min to prevent a tie.

DrWilgy wrote:
Quin wrote:
DrWilgy wrote:@Sloonei I gut read you as bad from me due to a feeling of dancing around the pizza last night. A forced non-grasping of the Rico situation. This is heavily dependent upon other's alignements though.

@Sprityo I gut read you due to your request of wishing to team with Mac following mine.

@Lorab, yes that is what I stated. Your point?
What's your view on Sloonei now that you have an alignment to work with?
Sloonei is no longer on my baddiedar.
Losing track of your fake reads, Doctor?

No baddiedar is different. I have no impulse to vote for you but in a gth scenario I do think you are still bad.

Honestly at this point with how little time ive had to read/contribute all my thoughts are just a gth random mess.

Posted: **Wed Oct 26, 2016 9:11 pm**

Sloonei wrote:
Glorfindel wrote:
DrWilgy wrote:Glorf almost tied it and had to change it again.
My vote BROKE the tie and put INH ahead 5 votes to 4 - what on earth is going on here?
you guys appeared to vote simultaneously.

it was 4 against 4 until I moved my vote, setting it 3/5.

Posted: **Wed Oct 26, 2016 9:11 pm**

DrWilgy wrote:
Sloonei wrote:
DrWilgy wrote:
Sloonei wrote:
DrWilgy wrote:I actually trust the wagon without Lorab and sloon on it more.

Changed my vote.
Am I back in your bad graces?
You were never out of my bad graces and I still gth you bad. While I didn't want to vote with you, it's better than a tie.

For safe keeping I'll notate my vote record this phase. I was on INH, changed to Indiglo and changed back to INH all within 3 min to prevent a tie.

DrWilgy wrote:
Quin wrote:
DrWilgy wrote:@Sloonei I gut read you as bad from me due to a feeling of dancing around the pizza last night. A forced non-grasping of the Rico situation. This is heavily dependent upon other's alignements though.

@Sprityo I gut read you due to your request of wishing to team with Mac following mine.

@Lorab, yes that is what I stated. Your point?
What's your view on Sloonei now that you have an alignment to work with?
Sloonei is no longer on my baddiedar.
Losing track of your fake reads, Doctor?
No baddiedar is different. I have no impulse to vote for you but in a gth scenario I do think you are still bad.

Honestly at this point with how little time ive had to read/contribute all my thoughts are just a gth random mess.

You think this computes over here? "Off the baddiedar" seems to strongly suggest "not a suspect".

Posted: **Wed Oct 26, 2016 9:12 pm**

Sloonei wrote:
Glorfindel wrote:
DrWilgy wrote:Glorf almost tied it and had to change it again.
My vote BROKE the tie and put INH ahead 5 votes to 4 - what on earth is going on here?
you guys appeared to vote simultaneously.

I don't believe so, my friend. After I lodged my vote, the table had INH ahead 5 votes to 4. You addressed both myself and Mac in breaking the tie. I did.

Posted: **Wed Oct 26, 2016 9:13 pm**

Nah. Baddies I'd vote for. GTH baddies I still need to think about.

Glorf why is it 5-3 then?

Posted: **Wed Oct 26, 2016 9:13 pm**

Nah. Baddies I'd vote for. GTH baddies I still need to think about.

Glorf why is it 5-3 then?

Posted: **Wed Oct 26, 2016 9:17 pm**

Glorfindel wrote:
Sloonei wrote:
Glorfindel wrote:
DrWilgy wrote:Glorf almost tied it and had to change it again.
My vote BROKE the tie and put INH ahead 5 votes to 4 - what on earth is going on here?
you guys appeared to vote simultaneously.
I don't believe so, my friend. After I lodged my vote, the table had INH ahead 5 votes to 4. You addressed both myself and Mac in breaking the tie. I did.

Not at the exact same moment, but there was a lot of confusion there at the end and I don't blame either of you for getting the numbers and things mixed up there. Both of you were just trying to avoid a tie and apparently were clicking like madmen. Wilgy dropped a vote on INH to make it 4 to 3, then moved to indiglo, then back to INH. Did you vote for indiglo at any point? I honestly forget. It was confusing to look at.

Posted: **Wed Oct 26, 2016 9:18 pm**

DrWilgy wrote:Nah. Baddies I'd vote for. GTH baddies I still need to think about.

Glorf why is it 5-3 then?

Why was I off your baddiedar on Day 2? Am I back on it now?

Posted: **Wed Oct 26, 2016 9:22 pm**

Sloonei wrote:
Glorfindel wrote:
Sloonei wrote:
Glorfindel wrote:
DrWilgy wrote:Glorf almost tied it and had to change it again.
My vote BROKE the tie and put INH ahead 5 votes to 4 - what on earth is going on here?
you guys appeared to vote simultaneously.
I don't believe so, my friend. After I lodged my vote, the table had INH ahead 5 votes to 4. You addressed both myself and Mac in breaking the tie. I did.
Not at the exact same moment, but there was a lot of confusion there at the end and I don't blame either of you for getting the numbers and things mixed up there. Both of you were just trying to avoid a tie and apparently were clicking like madmen. Wilgy dropped a vote on INH to make it 4 to 3, then moved to indiglo, then back to INH. Did you vote for indiglo at any point? I honestly forget. It was confusing to look at.

I placed ONE vote. ONCE. On INH.

Posted: **Wed Oct 26, 2016 9:25 pm**

Here's what I remember:
Wilgy dropped a vote on INH, making it 4 to 3.
Wilgy then moved his vote to indiglo. It was 4 to 4, with Glorfindel as the 4th INH voter.
Wilgy moved his vote back to INH.
Result pending.

Posted: **Wed Oct 26, 2016 9:26 pm**

Sloonei wrote:
DrWilgy wrote:Nah. Baddies I'd vote for. GTH baddies I still need to think about.

Glorf why is it 5-3 then?
Why was I off your baddiedar on Day 2? Am I back on it now?

I don't remember when u got off of it, and you are still off it.

Posted: **Wed Oct 26, 2016 9:30 pm**

DrWilgy wrote:
Sloonei wrote:
DrWilgy wrote:Nah. Baddies I'd vote for. GTH baddies I still need to think about.

Glorf why is it 5-3 then?
Why was I off your baddiedar on Day 2? Am I back on it now?
I don't remember when u got off of it, and you are still off it.

But you distrust me and don't want to vote for the same person as me?

Posted: **Wed Oct 26, 2016 9:31 pm**

Sloonei wrote:Here's what I remember:
Wilgy dropped a vote on INH, making it 4 to 3.
Wilgy then moved his vote to indiglo. It was 4 to 4, with Glorfindel as the 4th INH voter.
Wilgy moved his vote back to INH.
Result pending.

When I voted, it was 4 all between Indiglo and INH.
I voted INH making it 5 to 4 in INH's favour
I refreshed and the vote had changed to 5 all (hence my response to Mac's post).
I refreshed again and it was 5 to 3 in INH's favour.

I'm seriously starting to see the advantages of non-changeable votes...

Posted: **Wed Oct 26, 2016 9:31 pm**

Sloonei wrote:
DrWilgy wrote:
Sloonei wrote:
DrWilgy wrote:Nah. Baddies I'd vote for. GTH baddies I still need to think about.

Glorf why is it 5-3 then?
Why was I off your baddiedar on Day 2? Am I back on it now?
I don't remember when u got off of it, and you are still off it.
But you distrust me and don't want to vote for the same person as me?

If he's scum thats a good sign for you, according to scotty.

Posted: **Wed Oct 26, 2016 9:33 pm**

Glorfindel wrote:
Sloonei wrote:Here's what I remember:
Wilgy dropped a vote on INH, making it 4 to 3.
Wilgy then moved his vote to indiglo. It was 4 to 4, with Glorfindel as the 4th INH voter.
Wilgy moved his vote back to INH.
Result pending.
When I voted, it was 4 all between Indiglo and INH.
I voted INH making it 5 to 4 in INH's favour
I refreshed and the vote had changed to 5 all (hence my response to Mac's post).
I refreshed again and it was 5 to 3 in INH's favour.

I'm seriously starting to see the advantages of non-changeable votes...

This math does not check out. It was 3 to 3 for the longest time. Wilgy made it 4 for INH to 3 for indi. I am not sure when he changed his vote relative to your vote, but for a brief moment he was on indi and you were on INH. This made it 4 to 4, but then he changed his vote.

Wilgy, why did you change your vote to indiglo?

Posted: **Wed Oct 26, 2016 9:34 pm**

I don't think it was ever 5-all.

The Syndicate

MAD MAX: GAME OVER

Re: MAD MAX: Day 4

Re: MAD MAX: Day 4

Re: MAD MAX: Day 4

Re: MAD MAX: Day 4

Re: MAD MAX: Day 4

Re: MAD MAX: Day 4

Re: MAD MAX: Day 4

Re: MAD MAX: Day 4

Re: MAD MAX: Day 4

Re: MAD MAX: Day 4

Re: MAD MAX: Day 4

Re: MAD MAX: Day 4

Re: MAD MAX: Day 4

Re: MAD MAX: Day 4

Re: MAD MAX: Day 4

Re: MAD MAX: Day 4

Re: MAD MAX: Day 4

Re: MAD MAX: Day 4

Re: MAD MAX: Day 4

Re: MAD MAX: Day 4

Re: MAD MAX: Day 4

Re: MAD MAX: Day 4

Re: MAD MAX: Day 4

Re: MAD MAX: Day 4

Re: MAD MAX: Day 4

Re: MAD MAX: Day 4

Re: MAD MAX: Day 4

Re: MAD MAX: Day 4

Re: MAD MAX: Day 4

Re: MAD MAX: Day 4

Re: MAD MAX: Day 4

Re: MAD MAX: Day 4

Re: MAD MAX: Day 4

Re: MAD MAX: Day 4

Re: MAD MAX: Day 4

Re: MAD MAX: Day 4

Re: MAD MAX: Day 4

Re: MAD MAX: Day 4

Re: MAD MAX: Day 4

Re: MAD MAX: Day 4

Re: MAD MAX: Day 4

Re: MAD MAX: Day 4

Re: MAD MAX: Day 4

Re: MAD MAX: Day 4

Re: MAD MAX: Day 4

Re: MAD MAX: Day 4

Re: MAD MAX: Day 4

Re: MAD MAX: Day 4

Re: MAD MAX: Day 4

Re: MAD MAX: Day 4