The Syndicate

Rbzmncaeaei wrote:So are you going to give us that one read or not?

Floyd is town.

YOu know what I will be switching I do think Rico's post are genuine, and I really don't like that Golden and Seaside voted for him. It seems as if Seaside voted for rico without any reasoning to put the nail in the coffin so to speak. I also trust Wilgy's read and agree with him about Golden/LC voting

Ricochet wrote:

Rbzmncaeaei wrote:So are you going to give us that one read or not?

Floyd is town.

Perfect. That's all, enjoy the warm embrace of death.

I've not read every post on the subject but I read jjjs iso post along with a few others and I'm not 100% behind this Rico vote. Like I see it but I don't think it's super strong....meh

From what I skimmed of the jjj v golden I felt golden was more likely bad and trying to set jjj up for the lynch.

My dilemma now is if I want to put my vote on Rico just for the padded insurance (so vote manips hopefully won't mess with things) or with golden who I find more suspicious.

Internet on my PC is completely gone now
I find it super hard to post on a phone.

Anyway, there are so many ppl online now that if everyone has doubts they could change this. Don't just sit back if u got a problem. We all have to wear this.

The biggest disappointment is probably that this is supposed to be a crossover game, yet it feels lopsided in which side is dominating the ongoing pace, energy and mentality, with their fixed impressions on what would town or scum do or say, whilst I have to fall victim for staying true to myself.

I would never hard defend a mafia teammate, in such bad fashion and timing.

I wouldn't drop caveats or double-thoughts in my reads of a teammate, only to appear to have distanced from him, post mafia flip.

Bad mislynches (which I didn't even get to do, lol) and clean reads of players flipping mafia have frequently been my death sentences.

I don't make wall-o-texts and reads just to throw smoke in players' eyes.

I always want to hear reasoned voted and you'll probably get snark from me if you'll do otherwise, on a top wagon, influencing the lynch quasi-decisively to top it all - oh, and against me!

Same as I ever was!
Same as I ever was!
Same as I ever was!

Rbzmncaeaei wrote:

Ricochet wrote:

Rbzmncaeaei wrote:So are you going to give us that one read or not?

Floyd is town.

Perfect. That's all, enjoy the warm embrace of death.

Worry not. If this is paradise, I wish I had a lawnmower.

Russtifinko wrote:What'd I say? Being accused by Epi is a death knell. Rico's leading in votes and I'm tied for second. He's playing you guys.


I had even less time than I hoped today, and I hoped for relatively little. Voting Sorsha based on previous pings, the way yesterday went down vote-wise, and because she has enough votes that it could actually matter.

I agree that we're probably getting played by epi but there aren't enough votes there for me to vote that way today.

Ricochet wrote:(which I didn't even get to do, lol)

Same as he ever was.

Don't let this be a tie

Rbzmncaeaei wrote:

Ricochet wrote:(which I didn't even get to do, lol)

Same as he ever was.

BWT if I were, for example, to play the way you do in sussing and assessing players, I'd be easy for me to call you scum for snipping posts.

But as I've said, mentalities and cultures...

Rico have you not voted yet? Either way I suggest you vote with me on Golden even if it is just to save yourself.

Also again his most recent post seems like something a townie would do.

Voting Golden

Sorsha right know the vote is tied between Golden and Rico if you think Golden is more suspicious vote for him. Using the reasoning of voting manipulation is strange since they are tied

sig wrote:Rico have you not voted yet? Either way I suggest you vote with me on Golden even if it is just to save yourself.

Also again his most recent post seems like something a townie would do.

There are still enough players who haven't voted. We're in no hurry, sugar and spice.

Oh thank god 40 mins left. Thought it was gonna end in 1min and is have to change to golden to avoid the tie

Hmmm

I kind of want to lynch ricochet. The Talking Heads lyrics in every post looks like role responsibility and there is only one role in the game that isn't defined on page 1. Psycho Killer?

seaside wrote:Oh thank god 40 mins left. Thought it was gonna end in 1min and is have to change to golden to avoid the tie

This is why I'm glad I gave incorrect times. Why would you change your vote to Golden just to break a tie if you think Rico is more likely to be scum?

Wait no there are others. Ignore me.

seaside wrote:Oh thank god 40 mins left. Thought it was gonna end in 1min and is have to change to golden to avoid the tie

Search "Rico"

Results: "good"

Search "Golden"

Results: "good"

@Rico - who would YOU lynch, if you got to elect?

Rbzmncaeaei wrote:

seaside wrote:Oh thank god 40 mins left. Thought it was gonna end in 1min and is have to change to golden to avoid the tie

This is why I'm glad I gave incorrect times. Why would you change your vote to Golden just to break a tie if you think Rico is more likely to be scum?

No lynch no info for town either way.
Wanting a no lynch is very scummy

seaside wrote:

Rbzmncaeaei wrote:

seaside wrote:Oh thank god 40 mins left. Thought it was gonna end in 1min and is have to change to golden to avoid the tie

This is why I'm glad I gave incorrect times. Why would you change your vote to Golden just to break a tie if you think Rico is more likely to be scum?

No lynch no info for town either way.
Wanting a no lynch is very scummy

It wouldn't be a no lynch, silly. Read the rules.

Ricochet wrote:

seaside wrote:Oh thank god 40 mins left. Thought it was gonna end in 1min and is have to change to golden to avoid the tie

Search "Rico"

Results: "good"

Search "Golden"

Results: "good"

Changed my opinion after reading ur post history.
While u refuse to vote or even give an opinion

Rbzmncaeaei wrote:

seaside wrote:

Rbzmncaeaei wrote:

seaside wrote:Oh thank god 40 mins left. Thought it was gonna end in 1min and is have to change to golden to avoid the tie

This is why I'm glad I gave incorrect times. Why would you change your vote to Golden just to break a tie if you think Rico is more likely to be scum?

No lynch no info for town either way.
Wanting a no lynch is very scummy

It wouldn't be a no lynch, silly. Read the rules.

What would it be then?

It would be random, what is it at RYM

seaside wrote:

Rbzmncaeaei wrote:

seaside wrote:

Rbzmncaeaei wrote:

seaside wrote:Oh thank god 40 mins left. Thought it was gonna end in 1min and is have to change to golden to avoid the tie

This is why I'm glad I gave incorrect times. Why would you change your vote to Golden just to break a tie if you think Rico is more likely to be scum?

No lynch no info for town either way.
Wanting a no lynch is very scummy

It wouldn't be a no lynch, silly. Read the rules.

What would it be then?

Randomly picked lynch between the tie.

Golden wrote:@Rico - who would YOU lynch, if you got to elect?

Priority is still preservation.

If not, tough to say, I'm afraid my reads completion have been invariably screwed by these events. I'd have to pull a less-than-30-minute option. Independent of any tally or preservation issues and based on how players reacted to the wagons this EoD, I could sanction seaside with a vote.

sig wrote:It would be random, what is it at RYM

It would be a no lynch. My bad. I was wondering why you all were being so careless bout a tie and refusing to be the one to make the vote that would put someone in the lead. So I did it.

MacDougall wrote:Hmmm

I kind of want to lynch ricochet. The Talking Heads lyrics in every post looks like role responsibility and there is only one role in the game that isn't defined on page 1. Psycho Killer?

Here's a factual motivation, in case my own disclaimer (replicating my disclaimer in the D0 private thread, that K4J and Matt referenced - hence my ideas pre-dating any challenge or motivation) in the thread isn't trustworthy or doesn't cling genuine.

Ricochet wrote:

Golden wrote:@Rico - who would YOU lynch, if you got to elect?

Priority is still preservation.

If not, tough to say, I'm afraid my reads completion have been invariably screwed by these events. I'd have to pull a less-than-30-minute option. Independent of any tally or preservation issues and based on how players reacted to the wagons this EoD, I could sanction seaside with a vote.

Best u can come up with is a OMGUS?

Makes sense to me, it helps town the least.

seaside wrote:

Ricochet wrote:

Golden wrote:@Rico - who would YOU lynch, if you got to elect?

Priority is still preservation.

If not, tough to say, I'm afraid my reads completion have been invariably screwed by these events. I'd have to pull a less-than-30-minute option. Independent of any tally or preservation issues and based on how players reacted to the wagons this EoD, I could sanction seaside with a vote.

Best u can come up with is a OMGUS?

To me, it's only an OMGUS if you strip it of any arguments for suspecting back or don't have any, and I have mentioned plenty times already why your vote - votes, even! - are pretty shoddy.

U r making it out like I've said no reasons though.

Ricochet wrote:

MacDougall wrote:Hmmm

I kind of want to lynch ricochet. The Talking Heads lyrics in every post looks like role responsibility and there is only one role in the game that isn't defined on page 1. Psycho Killer?

Here's a factual motivation, in case my own disclaimer (replicating my disclaimer in the D0 private thread, that K4J and Matt referenced - hence my ideas pre-dating any challenge or motivation) in the thread isn't trustworthy or doesn't cling genuine.

Hmm I didn't see that. You are winning in a landslide hahaha.

seaside wrote:U r making it out like I've said no reasons though.

You haven't. You announced a post, lost it (genuinely sorry to hear that) and stuck with "grumpy Rico" as a shield.

MacDougall wrote:

Ricochet wrote:

MacDougall wrote:Hmmm

I kind of want to lynch ricochet. The Talking Heads lyrics in every post looks like role responsibility and there is only one role in the game that isn't defined on page 1. Psycho Killer?

Here's a factual motivation, in case my own disclaimer (replicating my disclaimer in the D0 private thread, that K4J and Matt referenced - hence my ideas pre-dating any challenge or motivation) in the thread isn't trustworthy or doesn't cling genuine.

Hmm I didn't see that. You are winning in a landslide hahaha.

I wouldn't be so sure. MP did not say the most usage as in quantity, but the most intriguing/entertaining usage, so since the beginning I have been using a lot of well-disguised and hidden Talking Heads lyrics in my posts to earn that title. Lately I've been half-assing it though, so we shall see who comes out victorious.

Ricochet wrote:

seaside wrote:U r making it out like I've said no reasons though.

You haven't. You announced a post, lost it (genuinely sorry to hear that) and stuck with "grumpy Rico" as a shield.

Your attitude is scummy.

But I'll go into more detail.
It goes beyond the posts in this last hour too.
U don't care apparently, but obsessively stick around for the end of the day
U r obviously deeply concerned bout the result
The burning down the house post
The way u brush it off
The way u say how u play and defend it so much, yet it being diff to ur actual style etc etc

Less than ten minutes, folks.

Rbzmncaeaei wrote:Less than ten minutes, folks.

Who do u intend to vote for. Outright say it. None of this wish washy I need time. Who right now, in these current circumstances r u going to vote for?

Why u hiding behind so much fluff n confusion

Rico is going to vote for me out of self-preservation. I don't hold it against him. It is how it is. I brought my own lynch on myself anyway.

I just have my fingers crossed that it was the right thing to do.

I think he intends to not vote on purpose, which is weak even for someone who knows that they're going to be lynched, which he still might not be.

Actually, I say let's keep it interesting and in the top wagons vicinity. It feels like it's been a day of LC presumed defenders (and possible distancers) rather than bussers or spreaders, so technically Sorsha, Golden and myself fit the bill as top wagons. I'm not LC's teammate, so I'm curious if the rabbit won't come out of a different hat. Going with Golden, here's what I had written on him:

-- D1 disapproves of LC's vote for bea, considering the better alternative that it's RVS or fake attempt
-- feelings improve after reading LC's elaboration on voting bea (also looking at his bea-Rico connection)
-- inquires JJJ on how well he knows LC, in order to question his case making depth and such
-- D2 considers LC being bad, but also believes it would be alike him to make an elaborate fake case
-- believes in LC being good and thinks JJJ is trying to kill him and fool everyone else
-- D3 calls bea, JJJ and LC scheme team; hounds JJJ
-- references a game in which LC and him were teammates and pulled a similar gambit; maybe I'm missing something, yet I still wonder, how is that supposed to be an argument in his favour?

also I asked him about some pretty visible flippy-floppy on sig and I don't think he answered adequately
he suspected B24 heavily (meta reminders [of a bad game?]) and voted him D2 early on, kept it consistent, went back to him late in the game; possible early blend

Rbzmncaeaei wrote:I think he intends to not vote on purpose, which is weak even for someone who knows that they're going to be lynched, which he still might not be.

I may not fear the music, but I still fear the Hosts.

Hey, I want to be clear rico, I called you, JJJ, bea and LC the scheme team. All four of you.

And one of you is about to be lynched. So lets hope I'm right.

He said originally it is just how he plays. I'm calling bs on that though. Deliberate method to stay on the fence and not being drawn into contradictory position later on.

Ricochet wrote:

Rbzmncaeaei wrote:I think he intends to not vote on purpose, which is weak even for someone who knows that they're going to be lynched, which he still might not be.

I may not fear the music, but I still fear the Hosts.

Good on you then. No, really. I was hoping you were better than what I suggested.

linki@Golden - Haha, I knew it.

Rbzmncaeaei wrote:linki@Golden - Haha, I knew it.

What other solution was there, really!?