The Syndicate

Quin wrote:

Jackofhearts2005 wrote:Fred, what are you thinking? Who is scum? Who is town?

Don't be neutral. I will give you slack later for ill conceived arguments as long as you actually make some reads.

It'll be good for you.

Not a big fan of this post. Can you explain what you were trying to do here? Specifically in when you prematurely said you'd give him slack for his reads? Why would it be good for him?

Cus I don't scumhunt, this is literally the first time I've ever attempted to be so frivolous with my reads. Typically I depend on mechanics to support suspicions before I even voice them, I'm typically very strong the later the game goes, it's actually why I have a pretty good win percentage at the realms, because I'm not viewed as a threat I guess. I pay attention to what is said, and will go back if I feel something is warranted to look into, but I typically don't put a lot of stock in early game posturing. So I am actually trying something different...

If I may answer his question and be all overtly braggadocio in my personal assessment.

Three players bickering does not a mafia player make.

Though it may gain me a vote, I find this argument dishonest.

Fredwood wrote:
<snip>

lol, I literally said it in the post. Based of the bickering between the 3 of you, my assumption is that one is scum trying to confuse the sheep from following blindly. If you pro and con it, JJJ and Golden have more pros then you (eluded to some specific instances in the post and some others that I chose not to get into because I have mentioned them previously), so thus (POE) you are trailing in the civ read department atm. I said that I don't think it's a strong enough case to lynch you at the moment, but apparently this is the way the wind is blowing. I'm a careful and patient voter, and I don't think I'm just a follower, I will say that I will be unlikely to vote for you this phase barring some dramatic revelation or argument that I hadn't considered, but I do think I've been nothing if consistent in my reads of everyone, which I admit may just be confirmation bias.

Fred, who are you looking at voting for this round?

link - I don't know what a "typical is"

OH SORRY - you meant the word typical! I thought it was some mafia term I didn't know!

Jackofhearts2005 wrote:

Spoiler: show

Fredwood wrote:

Jackofhearts2005 wrote:

Fredwood wrote:

speedchuck wrote:

Scotty wrote: What do you think of jack?

Not great.

speedchuck wrote:

Jackofhearts2005 wrote: Note the extreme tone difference between my question and Quinn's accusation.

Also note that I have disagreed with the Dizzy lynch and put him as town. While Quin, INH and MM were after Dizzy, I was voting Scotty. Was gonna answer Quin's question towards me on Dizzy but figured I'd just clutter the thread with more linkis. Was sure she was town. Had already said so.

Can we be friends again?

Coming back with a full rainbow in a couple hours.

This post makes me feel happy/nervous.
Like, it's a reasonable come-around and I was hoping for it, but also feels suspiciously like backtracking in a slow way to avoid town wrath.
Sry Jack I am catching up and making notes about shifts like this and whatnot. Not necessarily wanting to murder your face yet.
But this post is important.

This, combined with my earlier saying that there is a scum in Golden/JJJ/Jack/Strawhenge (That was a gut feel.)
Good feelings about Golden right now.
Strawhenge is gone.
JJJ just got cleared.

Jack, today at least, seemed like he was going along with Quin (possibly misinformed towny, it's hard to read someone when you don't understand their thought process) without committing too hard, seeing if the lynch could be pushed toward Sloonei/other people that lynched mM.
Other days I've been iffy about him.
Strong anti-alignment with JJJ.
As Sloonei just pointed out, he's been iffy toward Marmot.
I could vote for Jack. What are the votals at?

Secondary suspicions that I want to iron out at the moment:
INH (I lumped him with mm yesterday, because they were buddying insanely. Could be scum taking town town with them, or... blatant buddying. Everything else was blatant at EOD.
Fredwood (Sorry, I've read you as town all game, but if Jack is bad, gotta reeval)
Soneji
Mayybe long con

Scotty isn't entirely in the clear, but I like his posts enough at the moment to not kick up a fuss over giving him time to use his role.

I have to reveal what? If he's bad? I've been suspicious of Jack in every post I've mentioned him. My assumption is that of Golden/JJJ/and Jack that 2 are town and one is scum, with Jack leading. Golden has lessened on Jack a bit, but day one was a triumvirate of bickering. I can't say that Jack has done something overtly scummy this game, but the others have given more information they did not need to (IE not under pressure to do so), and have given more indication in other regards to imply that they're more likely civ.

My main issue is the view that he's the most suspicious of all available scum reads.

Why am I most suspicious? Be specific.

And I won't give you slack on this read. Make it good.

lol, I literally said it in the post. Based of the bickering between the 3 of you, my assumption is that one is scum trying to confuse the sheep from following blindly. If you pro and con it, JJJ and Golden have more pros then you (eluded to some specific instances in the post and some others that I chose not to get into because I have mentioned them previously), so thus (POE) you are trailing in the civ read department atm. I said that I don't think it's a strong enough case to lynch you at the moment, but apparently this is the way the wind is blowing. I'm a careful and patient voter, and I don't think I'm just a follower, I will say that I will be unlikely to vote for you this phase barring some dramatic revelation or argument that I hadn't considered, but I do think I've been nothing if consistent in my reads of everyone, which I admit may just be confirmation bias.

Three players bickering does not a mafia player make.

Though it may gain me a vote, I find this argument dishonest.

Dishonest how? In that I don't really assume that?

I see 3 strong players, I see them all fighting amongst themselves. 1 player I know is carefully specific in what he puts out to be consumed, 2 others that I get the impression do the same.

So I says to myself, "Self, why would all 3 of these strong careful players be going after each other rather aggressively so early"

"Well Self, you are handsome and astute, but it appears that one of these smart intelligent and crafty players is actually trying to discredit the other smart intelligent and crafty, and most likely well-endowed players to cause confusion amongst the rest of the sheeple that depend on these strong, confident, supremely coiffed player to competently run the early day phases."

"Self, I am proud of your suspicion that is completely unfounded and based of extrapolation and massive leaps in logic, but is slightly defendable if you are called on it, despite it's inherit gamesmanship logic, because you have witnessed shenanigans like this before"

Frankly, if one of you 3 aren't mafia I'll give you my address and you can steal my 10 disc Alien boxset. If that's dishonest, I dunno, my read and logic may be flawed, but it certainly isn't dishonest.

Sloonei wrote:Speedchuck is intriguing me. I see nothing but an exuberant townie when I look at him, but then he's a leading suspect for a number of other people. I am wondering if there's something I am overlooking.

And the more I think about it, the less I like some of JOH's waffly posts on the marmot. How do others feel about their interactons?

Please keep in mind, I have never played with town Marmot and he has a weird play style.

It is really hard to tell what is scum Marmot and what is just Marmot.

juliets wrote:

Fredwood wrote:
<snip>

lol, I literally said it in the post. Based of the bickering between the 3 of you, my assumption is that one is scum trying to confuse the sheep from following blindly. If you pro and con it, JJJ and Golden have more pros then you (eluded to some specific instances in the post and some others that I chose not to get into because I have mentioned them previously), so thus (POE) you are trailing in the civ read department atm. I said that I don't think it's a strong enough case to lynch you at the moment, but apparently this is the way the wind is blowing. I'm a careful and patient voter, and I don't think I'm just a follower, I will say that I will be unlikely to vote for you this phase barring some dramatic revelation or argument that I hadn't considered, but I do think I've been nothing if consistent in my reads of everyone, which I admit may just be confirmation bias.

Fred, who are you looking at voting for this round?

link - I don't know what a "typical is"

Scotty, Soneji

I think INH is a possible lynch and would be fine with lynching. But his aggressiveness has at least been consistent.

Fredwood wrote:

juliets wrote:

Fredwood wrote:
<snip>

lol, I literally said it in the post. Based of the bickering between the 3 of you, my assumption is that one is scum trying to confuse the sheep from following blindly. If you pro and con it, JJJ and Golden have more pros then you (eluded to some specific instances in the post and some others that I chose not to get into because I have mentioned them previously), so thus (POE) you are trailing in the civ read department atm. I said that I don't think it's a strong enough case to lynch you at the moment, but apparently this is the way the wind is blowing. I'm a careful and patient voter, and I don't think I'm just a follower, I will say that I will be unlikely to vote for you this phase barring some dramatic revelation or argument that I hadn't considered, but I do think I've been nothing if consistent in my reads of everyone, which I admit may just be confirmation bias.

Fred, who are you looking at voting for this round?

link - I don't know what a "typical is"

Scotty, Soneji

I think INH is a possible lynch and would be fine with lynching. But his aggressiveness has at least been consistent.

Speaking of...hello

@Fred

How many times have you seen me go at it early with Rokk and/or Silver go at it only to have us turn out to both/all be town?

I don't believe that you really think good players + aggressiveness + disagreement = mafia.

Jackofhearts2005 wrote:@Fred

How many times have you seen me go at it early with Rokk and/or Silver go at it only to have us turn out to both/all be town?

I don't believe that you really think good players + aggressiveness + disagreement = mafia.

It's not common enough to be treated as WIFOM (am I using that correctly?).

So I've been both busy IRL and with running my own game on NF, disheartened with how far behind I've become in this game. I have tried just reading the last couple pages and looking into my suspects from before, along with vote counts from the first two lynches. The thing that stood out to me most while going through all this was that Fredwood didn't have a vote listed for D1 or D2 in the final vote counts, so I looked through his post history to see if he had just unvoted...he hasn't put down a single vote this entire game so far. CTLR+F turned up the word vote quite a number of times from him but it was in regards to basing reads of his on how other people voted or giving reasons why he didn't vote sig or Dys. He said in one of D1 posts that he doesn't like to rush votes but this is just straight not moving from the starting line.

[VOTE: ] aubergine[VOTE:


I saw Nutella cleared JJJ, though I'm not sure I exactly trust that. Nutella had been being buddy-buddy with JJJ early on and I don't care for JJJ's vote history.

juliet's said something about how Scotty here reminded her of herself in GoC when she mislynched me. I checked that game to see if she was still alive and at least according to the player list she hasn't died yet, so it pings me that she is using her unconfirmed alignment there to townread someone here.

Need to see more into Golden with the time I have. I read Sloonei's JoH case but it didn't really register bad with me, maybe due to it hinging on being more caught up with the thread.] aubergine

Fredwood wrote:

Jackofhearts2005 wrote:@Fred

How many times have you seen me go at it early with Rokk and/or Silver go at it only to have us turn out to both/all be town?

I don't believe that you really think good players + aggressiveness + disagreement = mafia.

It's not common enough to be treated as WIFOM (am I using that correctly?).

It's like 90% of games Silver and I are town and 50% of games Rokk and I are town.

I'm not sure what you're trying to say.

Fredwood wrote:I think INH is a possible lynch and would be fine with lynching. But his aggressiveness has at least been consistent.

Actually, no. This reminds me of a point I forgot to bring up. So Golden (I think?) says to INH at some point that he hadn't had any strong opinions or pushes. Next thing you know is INH coming in with a super tunnel vision on me and a case that is blagh. He showed no interest in talking to me or further assess his read when I interacted with him. He had posts designed to make me the lynch over anyone else with leading questions ["Would you all prefer a no lynch or a Dyslexicon lynch?"]. He also had the most siren gif worthy response to Silver's question about if I flipped town could he vig INH ["Do I have to be bad if Dizzy isn't scum? Why didn't you kill off players on the Sig wagon?"]. On newer sites some players view me as an easy target, so that is something I look for. Ultimately the push for my lynch failed, and Marmot was revealed as scum. What has INH done today? NOTHING.

I could very easily see INH as scum still.

INH, Long Con, Eloh, Speed, Jack, Soneji are all in my PoE.

Some players not in that list is more null.

I've addressed that I'm careful with my vote. I've gone entire games only voting once or twice sometimes never.

It came from many times where I would leave my vote on a lynch target, but wasn't sure if I could be there for the end of the phase, and the vote was exploited, or if I leave my vote with someone, it gets misused or not used. It might be that the Realms voting is just too sloppy for my tastes, not sure.

Additionally I rarely vote for someone who is voting for me because it feels like a cop out, (I'm not bad he is argument). I will also say that I was not on during Day 2 especially at the EoD portion, but I would have been on the Scotty wagon.

Soneji wrote:I saw Nutella cleared JJJ, though I'm not sure I exactly trust that. Nutella had been being buddy-buddy with JJJ early on and I don't care for JJJ's vote history.

Nutella's push was maybe the biggest reason the Marmot lynch gained traction, so what's not to trust about it?

If JJJ ever ends up scum, Soneji is scum buddies.
But lol. I'm done tinfoiling JJJ. He's sure town.

Jackofhearts2005 wrote:

Fredwood wrote:

Jackofhearts2005 wrote:@Fred

How many times have you seen me go at it early with Rokk and/or Silver go at it only to have us turn out to both/all be town?

I don't believe that you really think good players + aggressiveness + disagreement = mafia.

It's not common enough to be treated as WIFOM (am I using that correctly?).

It's like 90% of games Silver and I are town and 50% of games Rokk and I are town.

I'm not sure what you're trying to say.

I did not say in a 2 person scenario, I said when all 3 of these people are aggressive to each other. I've rarely been in a game where all 3 of you are in it, and all 3 are aggressive withing the first few days. If it was just the JJJ/Golden aggressiveness or your conflict with JJJ I could dismiss it. As I said, Golden appears to have backed off, but it was noticeable enough for me to bring it up, on multiple occasions.

Dyslexicon wrote:

Soneji wrote:I saw Nutella cleared JJJ, though I'm not sure I exactly trust that. Nutella had been being buddy-buddy with JJJ early on and I don't care for JJJ's vote history.

Nutella's push was maybe the biggest reason the Marmot lynch gained traction, so what's not to trust about it?

If JJJ ever ends up scum, Soneji is scum buddies.
But lol. I'm done tinfoiling JJJ. He's sure town.

I tinfoil a baddie trio of 3J, nutella and Sloonei. I had to use up three rolls of the stuff for this one.

Quin wrote:I tinfoil a baddie trio of 3J, nutella and Sloonei. I had to use up three rolls of the stuff for this one.

Lol. Shouldn't you ass me in there too, just for good measure?
Anyway, I would gladly hand them a scum win if that was the case. Not in a million years though.

*Add me, not ass me. I don't think we're at that level of intimacy yet.

I would still be willing to vote for INH, in fact I nearly did earlier except it felt irrelevant.

In fact, I will

vote insertnamehere

Vote insertnamehere

This is something I want to tussle about. Also, I'm back, baby. Done with my things for now, ready to vote all over the place.

Jackofhearts2005 wrote:

Quin wrote:
GTH reads after everything that's happened today, with a few exclusions.

Civ:
INH
Marmot
Long Con
Silver
Golden
speedchuck
Scotty

Bad:
3J
JOH
Sloonei
nutella
Dizzy
Fredwood

How much do you still agree with this rainbow, Quin?

Literally one of my supposed scumbuddies is undecided on me. The rest are saying I'm at the top of their scum list.

Who are my buddies? (Trick question. I don't have any. Answer anyway.)

Quin?

Dyslexicon wrote:

Fredwood wrote:I think INH is a possible lynch and would be fine with lynching. But his aggressiveness has at least been consistent.

Actually, no. This reminds me of a point I forgot to bring up. So Golden (I think?) says to INH at some point that he hadn't had any strong opinions or pushes. Next thing you know is INH coming in with a super tunnel vision on me and a case that is blagh. He showed no interest in talking to me or further assess his read when I interacted with him. He had posts designed to make me the lynch over anyone else with leading questions ["Would you all prefer a no lynch or a Dyslexicon lynch?"]. He also had the most siren gif worthy response to Silver's question about if I flipped town could he vig INH ["Do I have to be bad if Dizzy isn't scum? Why didn't you kill off players on the Sig wagon?"]. On newer sites some players view me as an easy target, so that is something I look for. Ultimately the push for my lynch failed, and Marmot was revealed as scum. What has INH done today? NOTHING.

I could very easily see INH as scum still.

INH, Long Con, Eloh, Speed, Jack, Soneji are all in my PoE.

Some players not in that list is more null.

I wasn't stating this as a reason not to lynch him, he is one of my best 3 reads, but he does have a slight advantage over the others.

Vote INH

Because it looks cool with three votes in a row.

But also, because excitement.

Though, I would very much like the vote count.

Jackofhearts2005 wrote:

Jackofhearts2005 wrote:

Quin wrote:
GTH reads after everything that's happened today, with a few exclusions.

Civ:
INH
Marmot
Long Con
Silver
Golden
speedchuck
Scotty

Bad:
3J
JOH
Sloonei
nutella
Dizzy
Fredwood

How much do you still agree with this rainbow, Quin?

Literally one of my supposed scumbuddies is undecided on me. The rest are saying I'm at the top of their scum list.

Who are my buddies? (Trick question. I don't have any. Answer anyway.)

Quin?

nutella, dizzy and Jay went up. Adding Eloh up as a civ. Scotty moved down. Removing Long Con entirely.

Fredwood wrote: Dishonest how? In that I don't really assume that?

I see 3 strong players, I see them all fighting amongst themselves. 1 player I know is carefully specific in what he puts out to be consumed, 2 others that I get the impression do the same.

So I says to myself, "Self, why would all 3 of these strong careful players be going after each other rather aggressively so early"

"Well Self, you are handsome and astute, but it appears that one of these smart intelligent and crafty players is actually trying to discredit the other smart intelligent and crafty, and most likely well-endowed players to cause confusion amongst the rest of the sheeple that depend on these strong, confident, supremely coiffed player to competently run the early day phases."

"Self, I am proud of your suspicion that is completely unfounded and based of extrapolation and massive leaps in logic, but is slightly defendable if you are called on it, despite it's inherit gamesmanship logic, because you have witnessed shenanigans like this before"

Frankly, if one of you 3 aren't mafia I'll give you my address and you can steal my 10 disc Alien boxset. If that's dishonest, I dunno, my read and logic may be flawed, but it certainly isn't dishonest.

TBH, I made this same argument a few days ago and said I'd keep an eye on it. I'm not exactly sure who didn't like it then.
For me (at the time) it was Golden, JoH, JJJ, and Strawhenge (for some reason)
Might should throw Quin in there now. I would throw Sloonei in, but since he got here and helped in the leading, we've lynched a scum. Before, with the old leaders, we got nowhere. Sample size for this correlation: 2. Good enough.
I am a simple man.
Regardless, we probably have better options, especially with mm alignment. *coigh* INH *cough*

speedchuck wrote:Vote insertnamehere

This is something I want to tussle about. Also, I'm back, baby. Done with my things for now, ready to vote all over the place.

I will be disappointed if you don't hammer scum in the last minute. And I will certainly scum read you for doing or not doing it.

Dyslexicon wrote:*Add me, not ass me. I don't think we're at that level of intimacy yet.

So you're saying there is a level of intimacy




Don't know if that's the right Gif to convey...but it came up and amused me when I searched for Gifs from that show

I'm trying to find the case on Jack.

I found a post from sloonei setting out marmot/jack interactions and saying he could see a jack vote. He referenced Jay's case on Jack. I can't find Jay's case, if it exists. I can find Jay talking about what he perceives to be unnatural progressions, and perhaps it has something to do with EoD 2.

Can anyone voting for Jack tell me, in their own words, why they think he is worth a vote?

Quin wrote:

Jackofhearts2005 wrote:

Jackofhearts2005 wrote:

Quin wrote:
GTH reads after everything that's happened today, with a few exclusions.

Civ:
INH
Marmot
Long Con
Silver
Golden
speedchuck
Scotty

Bad:
3J
JOH
Sloonei
nutella
Dizzy
Fredwood

How much do you still agree with this rainbow, Quin?

Literally one of my supposed scumbuddies is undecided on me. The rest are saying I'm at the top of their scum list.

Who are my buddies? (Trick question. I don't have any. Answer anyway.)

Quin?

nutella, dizzy and Jay went up. Adding Eloh up as a civ. Scotty moved down. Removing Long Con entirely.

And my buddies? You're still voting for me aren't you?

Who are my teammates? Scotty, Sloonei and Fred?

Name one player you honestly think could be my scum teammate.

Why on earth would anyone read Eloh as town?

Dyslexicon wrote:

speedchuck wrote:Vote insertnamehere

This is something I want to tussle about. Also, I'm back, baby. Done with my things for now, ready to vote all over the place.

I will be disappointed if you don't hammer scum in the last minute. And I will certainly scum read you for doing or not doing it.

Gotta admit, I love having you in this game, even if you constantly want to kill me.

Fredwood wrote:

Dyslexicon wrote:*Add me, not ass me. I don't think we're at that level of intimacy yet.

So you're saying there is a level of intimacy




Don't know if that's the right Gif to convey...but it came up and amused me when I searched for Gifs from that show

It's perfect, except it's not moving.

Golden wrote:I'm trying to find the case on Jack.

I found a post from sloonei setting out marmot/jack interactions and saying he could see a jack vote. He referenced Jay's case on Jack. I can't find Jay's case, if it exists. I can find Jay talking about what he perceives to be unnatural progressions, and perhaps it has something to do with EoD 2.

Can anyone voting for Jack tell me, in their own words, why they think he is worth a vote?

Sorry, there was a post from JJJ that I thought was from Sloonei (the one about Jack easily going with popular opinions, which he's now responded to). But I think Sloonei's interaction review posts were also good.

The original case from JJJ is older, I believe it's actually back from early d2 (his analysis of the sig lynch + nacho kill). But that was weaker compared to the stuff from today.

Dyslexicon wrote:Why on earth would anyone read Eloh as town?

Because everyone is under the silly impression that Eloh is the town Busdrive, even though there is no evidentiary support for that assessment.

Jackofhearts2005 wrote:

Quin wrote:

Jackofhearts2005 wrote:

Jackofhearts2005 wrote:

Quin wrote:
GTH reads after everything that's happened today, with a few exclusions.

Civ:
INH
Marmot
Long Con
Silver
Golden
speedchuck
Scotty

Bad:
3J
JOH
Sloonei
nutella
Dizzy
Fredwood

How much do you still agree with this rainbow, Quin?

Literally one of my supposed scumbuddies is undecided on me. The rest are saying I'm at the top of their scum list.

Who are my buddies? (Trick question. I don't have any. Answer anyway.)

Quin?

nutella, dizzy and Jay went up. Adding Eloh up as a civ. Scotty moved down. Removing Long Con entirely.

And my buddies? You're still voting for me aren't you?

Who are my teammates? Scotty, Sloonei and Fred?

Name one player you honestly think could be my scum teammate.

metalmarsh89

unvote Scotty

Vote INH

His only defense (bonus: from other players) is WIFOM.

Yeah, maybe a bad townie but where is he now? Only scumhunted a player I'm convinced is town.

Most importantly, my role card doesn't say INH is town.

Golden wrote:I'm trying to find the case on Jack.

I found a post from sloonei setting out marmot/jack interactions and saying he could see a jack vote. He referenced Jay's case on Jack. I can't find Jay's case, if it exists. I can find Jay talking about what he perceives to be unnatural progressions, and perhaps it has something to do with EoD 2.

Can anyone voting for Jack tell me, in their own words, why they think he is worth a vote?

It's an okay case.

Basically, more than once, Jack has had interesting and polarizing reads/theories/statements. Then he keeps gravitating toward the mass opinion, the safe opinion. (There are exceptions, and I think I'm one of them)

Here is my post where I voted Jack:

speedchuck wrote:

Scotty wrote: What do you think of jack?

Not great.

speedchuck wrote:

Jackofhearts2005 wrote: Note the extreme tone difference between my question and Quinn's accusation.

Also note that I have disagreed with the Dizzy lynch and put him as town. While Quin, INH and MM were after Dizzy, I was voting Scotty. Was gonna answer Quin's question towards me on Dizzy but figured I'd just clutter the thread with more linkis. Was sure she was town. Had already said so.

Can we be friends again?

Coming back with a full rainbow in a couple hours.

This post makes me feel happy/nervous.
Like, it's a reasonable come-around and I was hoping for it, but also feels suspiciously like backtracking in a slow way to avoid town wrath.
Sry Jack I am catching up and making notes about shifts like this and whatnot. Not necessarily wanting to murder your face yet.
But this post is important.

This, combined with my earlier saying that there is a scum in Golden/JJJ/Jack/Strawhenge (That was a gut feel.)
Good feelings about Golden right now.
Strawhenge is gone.
JJJ just got cleared.

Jack, today at least, seemed like he was going along with Quin (possibly misinformed towny, it's hard to read someone when you don't understand their thought process) without committing too hard, seeing if the lynch could be pushed toward Sloonei/other people that lynched mM.
Other days I've been iffy about him.
Strong anti-alignment with JJJ.
As Sloonei just pointed out, he's been iffy toward Marmot.
I could vote for Jack. What are the votals at?

Secondary suspicions that I want to iron out at the moment:
INH (I lumped him with mm yesterday, because they were buddying insanely. Could be scum taking town town with them, or... blatant buddying. Everything else was blatant at EOD.
Fredwood (Sorry, I've read you as town all game, but if Jack is bad, gotta reeval)
Soneji
Mayybe long con

Scotty isn't entirely in the clear, but I like his posts enough at the moment to not kick up a fuss over giving him time to use his role.

It's a lot of different small things.

But INH is a better vote, based on yesterday's actions and flip alone. People seem to be ignoring him, which is weird.

Dyslexicon wrote:
Don't know if that's the right Gif to convey...but it came up and amused me when I searched for Gifs from that show

It's perfect, except it's not moving. [/quote]




Yeah had to find a new link of it that old one fooled me.

Quin wrote:

Jackofhearts2005 wrote:

Quin wrote:

Jackofhearts2005 wrote:

Jackofhearts2005 wrote:

Quin wrote:
GTH reads after everything that's happened today, with a few exclusions.

Civ:
INH
Marmot
Long Con
Silver
Golden
speedchuck
Scotty

Bad:
3J
JOH
Sloonei
nutella
Dizzy
Fredwood

How much do you still agree with this rainbow, Quin?

Literally one of my supposed scumbuddies is undecided on me. The rest are saying I'm at the top of their scum list.

Who are my buddies? (Trick question. I don't have any. Answer anyway.)

Quin?

nutella, dizzy and Jay went up. Adding Eloh up as a civ. Scotty moved down. Removing Long Con entirely.

And my buddies? You're still voting for me aren't you?

Who are my teammates? Scotty, Sloonei and Fred?

Name one player you honestly think could be my scum teammate.

metalmarsh89

For anyone keeping score at home, this is the point where Quin fell into the orange.

I remember tunneling town(ish) Quin. Not lazy town Quin.

speedchuck wrote:

Dyslexicon wrote:

speedchuck wrote:Vote insertnamehere

This is something I want to tussle about. Also, I'm back, baby. Done with my things for now, ready to vote all over the place.

I will be disappointed if you don't hammer scum in the last minute. And I will certainly scum read you for doing or not doing it.

Gotta admit, I love having you in this game, even if you constantly want to kill me.

Aw. And same - and your likability adds to my suspicion tbh.

Read this if you're scum: Read this if you're town:

Lynch INH


I said I would lynch him so I guess I should, even if it looks like a superwagon at this point.

Also, Pink cus Fuck you that's why.

Jackofhearts2005 wrote:

Quin wrote:

Jackofhearts2005 wrote:

Quin wrote:

Jackofhearts2005 wrote:

Jackofhearts2005 wrote:

Quin wrote:
GTH reads after everything that's happened today, with a few exclusions.

Civ:
INH
Marmot
Long Con
Silver
Golden
speedchuck
Scotty

Bad:
3J
JOH
Sloonei
nutella
Dizzy
Fredwood

How much do you still agree with this rainbow, Quin?

Literally one of my supposed scumbuddies is undecided on me. The rest are saying I'm at the top of their scum list.

Who are my buddies? (Trick question. I don't have any. Answer anyway.)

Quin?

nutella, dizzy and Jay went up. Adding Eloh up as a civ. Scotty moved down. Removing Long Con entirely.

And my buddies? You're still voting for me aren't you?

Who are my teammates? Scotty, Sloonei and Fred?

Name one player you honestly think could be my scum teammate.

metalmarsh89

For anyone keeping score at home, this is the point where Quin fell into the orange.

I remember tunneling town(ish) Quin. Not lazy town Quin.

I don't need to have an argument about who your teammates are to find you suspicious.

Fred, we had a claim of a redirected watcher night one. By definition, a redirecting role usually hits the roles it redirects to.
The watcher, after redirected, only saw Eloh. Thus, Eloh is probably redirector.

Granted, we may not trust the watcher (Golden), or clusterfuck rules might apply, but it's a pretty good bet that Eloh is redirector. Scum wouldn't have two of them, probably. Thus, Eloh is prob town.

I'm pretty confused at the sudden influx of INH votes. I'm still pretty convinced that his behavior was not that of a marmot teammate. I could be wrong but I thought there was a pretty good reason we all backed off from him.

speedchuck wrote:But INH is a better vote, based on yesterday's actions and flip alone. People seem to be ignoring him, which is weird.

Just from externally (as in, not there in the moment) inh comes out looking worst to me in the marmot vote.

Thanks nut and speed for giving me a little more context to the jack vote. It seems the primary beef against him is that he is blendy and that his opinions don't feel like they have held the weight of conviction behind them. Is that fair?