The Syndicate

nutella wrote:I just realized the marmot isn't playing this one. Can't remember the last time he wasn't in a game I played and I've gotten used to his presence being more or less a constant (ha, Lost reference unintentional). Feels weird, man.

G-Man wrote:Frustration is setting in. I haven't felt this twitchy since I kicked heroin. Four players haven't voted yet and they are all among the bottom five in post count. I wouldn't be surprised if one of them is a baddie, mates.

Dom, INH, notsawyer, Daisy- guys, where are you?

nutella wrote:Get rekt Widmore lol
RIP-in-a-neutral-way INH


Dom never showed up again yesterday did he? He was there at the beginning chatting about the show but never really participated in game discussion and instead seemed to disappear/maybe forgot about the game?

S~V~S wrote: And Speed, before G man said that Llama switched the vote to you I thought that maybe the two of you had BTSC since you paralleled him pretty closely. Why did you do that?

notsawyer540 wrote:I wonder how common the fake claim thing is. That would make it impossible to know if people are who they say they are.

Quin wrote:

Quin wrote:

notsawyer540 wrote:

Quin wrote:Let me get that classic Quin tinfoil out into the thread now rather than later.

G-Man's role card (as posted in the OP) doesn't specify alignment.

Quin wrote:

notsawyer540 wrote:Thinking about voting Quin because his PM didn't specify an alignment. Also thinking about voting INH because he's wrong as fuck about literally everything except for Sayid. Leaning INH because how the fuck can you be that wrong and not be evil?

huh

Sorry, misread that. Definitely considering voting INH right now.

'Definitely considering' sounds kind of confident for a vote that's been justified by the lols.

Throwing this back into the front line. Give me thoughts, people.

G-Man wrote:From my notes:

DFaraday = JOHN LOCKE
Dom = ???
Epignosis = ???
G-Man = CHARLIE PACE
notsawyer540 = KATE AUSTEN
nutella = JIN-SOO KWON
Quin = NIKKI FERNANDEZ
S~V~S = CLAIRE LITTLETON
Sorsha = HUGO "HURLEY" REYES
Spacedaisy = ???
Speedchuck = SUN-HWA KWON


thellama73 = DESMOND HUME
insertnamehere = SAYID JARRAH CHARLES WIDMORE

Sure would be nice if we could replace those bloody question marks with names.

DFaraday wrote:

notsawyer540 wrote:I wonder how common the fake claim thing is. That would make it impossible to know if people are who they say they are.

That's the point, isn't it? If the baddies didn't have fake claims, the civvies could just all throw out their claims immediately and that would be the end of it.

Though if I recall, in the first season game the bad roles were selected from among characters who weren't villainous on the show. That would kind of remove the need for fake claims, but I don't know if that was the case in the second game, or if it would apply here, since there were quite a few villain roles by that point on the show.

notsawyer540 wrote:About what? I didn't have any suspicions, so I said I was considering voting for INH just because we have differing opinions on aspects of the show. I was mostly dicking around. As far as Quin, that bit's covered in the part you quoted. I misread what Quin wrote and thought that he had said that his role PM didn't specify an alignment because I have a terrible habit of skim reading sometimes.

I do find you suspicious now, however, because of the way your post is addressed toward everyone except me. Seems to me you're trying to convince people to vote for me. If you really had any interest in my response, you would've directed your inquiry about me to me.

Vote DFaraday

Epignosis wrote:

G-Man wrote:From my notes:

DFaraday = JOHN LOCKE
Dom = ???
Epignosis = ???
G-Man = CHARLIE PACE
notsawyer540 = KATE AUSTEN
nutella = JIN-SOO KWON
Quin = NIKKI FERNANDEZ
S~V~S = CLAIRE LITTLETON
Sorsha = HUGO "HURLEY" REYES
Spacedaisy = ???
Speedchuck = SUN-HWA KWON


thellama73 = DESMOND HUME
insertnamehere = SAYID JARRAH CHARLES WIDMORE

Sure would be nice if we could replace those bloody question marks with names.

I don't understand how I'm ??? at all.

Quin wrote:we really are vompatti'ing this game aren't we

nutella, have a vote. I want your a conclusive statement of your thoughts on Dom.

G-Man wrote:

Epignosis wrote:

G-Man wrote:From my notes:

DFaraday = JOHN LOCKE
Dom = ???
Epignosis = ???
G-Man = CHARLIE PACE
notsawyer540 = KATE AUSTEN
nutella = JIN-SOO KWON
Quin = NIKKI FERNANDEZ
S~V~S = CLAIRE LITTLETON
Sorsha = HUGO "HURLEY" REYES
Spacedaisy = ???
Speedchuck = SUN-HWA KWON


thellama73 = DESMOND HUME
insertnamehere = SAYID JARRAH CHARLES WIDMORE

Sure would be nice if we could replace those bloody question marks with names.

I don't understand how I'm ??? at all.

Funny that you didn't bother correcting my false assumption that INH was Juliet. I would have hoped you'd be more forthcoming than that. Perhaps you're not one of us, but rather one of them, hoping for me to discredit myself on a false assumption. Curiouser and curiouser.

S~V~S wrote:

G-Man wrote:

Epignosis wrote:

G-Man wrote:From my notes:

DFaraday = JOHN LOCKE
Dom = ???
Epignosis = ???
G-Man = CHARLIE PACE
notsawyer540 = KATE AUSTEN
nutella = JIN-SOO KWON
Quin = NIKKI FERNANDEZ
S~V~S = CLAIRE LITTLETON
Sorsha = HUGO "HURLEY" REYES
Spacedaisy = ???
Speedchuck = SUN-HWA KWON


thellama73 = DESMOND HUME
insertnamehere = SAYID JARRAH CHARLES WIDMORE

Sure would be nice if we could replace those bloody question marks with names.

I don't understand how I'm ??? at all.

Funny that you didn't bother correcting my false assumption that INH was Juliet. I would have hoped you'd be more forthcoming than that. Perhaps you're not one of us, but rather one of them, hoping for me to discredit myself on a false assumption. Curiouser and curiouser.

Why is this so important to you?

nutella wrote:Hm, I wonder if Juliet is a regular civ this game or not. In season 3 she pretty much started out as one of the bad guys and then defected to the losties. My instinct is to trust Epi and assume Juliet is a civ role, since it would be a weird/less "safe" role to set up as a fake claim.

Quin wrote:

G-Man wrote:Fearing for my life tonight, guys. Without Desmond, who's going to keep death at bay?

Never fear, Paulo's here!

Spacedaisy wrote:... I find G-Man's vote for Quin because he claimed Nikki to be questionable. I was a baddie in season 2 and Golden provided good cover as far as fake role claims. Why on earth would he give them shitty role claims like that this time around? Also, just because a lot of fans hated Nikki and Paulo (I enjoyed their story, it just was not very well written into already established characters. Plus Paulo was some excellent eye candy, if you ask me, lol), that doesn't mean they are baddies.

S~V~S wrote:It feels to me like you are trying to manufacture reasons to suspect people. Daisy clearly said the baddies had alibis.

Spacedaisy wrote:... I find G-Man's vote for Quin because he claimed Nikki to be questionable. I was a baddie in season 2 and Golden provided good cover as far as fake role claims. Why on earth would he give them shitty role claims like that this time around? Also, just because a lot of fans hated Nikki and Paulo (I enjoyed their story, it just was not very well written into already established characters. Plus Paulo was some excellent eye candy, if you ask me, lol), that doesn't mean they are baddies.

S~V~S wrote:Because of that quote, they had them in season 2.

G-Man wrote:Further more, why wouldn't Nikki/Paulo be just as likely to be a cover as anyone else? If Golden randomized the cover roles again this game, then there's no need to dismiss the notion that Nikki/Paulo could be baddie covers. It would just be a cruel twist of fate that one or two of the most despised characters on Lost got used as cover roles. In fact, it adds a level of meta-WIFOM to it all, now doesn't it?

Hey, being bossy is fun. Maybe we should shouldn't let Jack and Locke hog all the fun from now on.

G-Man wrote:Further more, why wouldn't Nikki/Paulo be just as likely to be a cover as anyone else? If Golden randomized the cover roles again this game, then there's no need to dismiss the notion that Nikki/Paulo could be baddie covers. It would just be a cruel twist of fate that one or two of the most despised characters on Lost got used as cover roles. In fact, it adds a level of meta-WIFOM to it all, now doesn't it?

Hey, being bossy is fun. Maybe we should let Jack and Locke hog all the fun from now on.

If Golden randomized the cover roles again this game

G-Man wrote:

S~V~S wrote:

G-Man wrote:

Epignosis wrote:

G-Man wrote:From my notes:

DFaraday = JOHN LOCKE
Dom = ???
Epignosis = ???
G-Man = CHARLIE PACE
notsawyer540 = KATE AUSTEN
nutella = JIN-SOO KWON
Quin = NIKKI FERNANDEZ
S~V~S = CLAIRE LITTLETON
Sorsha = HUGO "HURLEY" REYES
Spacedaisy = ???
Speedchuck = SUN-HWA KWON


thellama73 = DESMOND HUME
insertnamehere = SAYID JARRAH CHARLES WIDMORE

Sure would be nice if we could replace those bloody question marks with names.

I don't understand how I'm ??? at all.

Funny that you didn't bother correcting my false assumption that INH was Juliet. I would have hoped you'd be more forthcoming than that. Perhaps you're not one of us, but rather one of them, hoping for me to discredit myself on a false assumption. Curiouser and curiouser.

Why is this so important to you?

For kicks and giggles mostly, but I want to know who is who to see if I can break a baddie via intuition like I did in Season 2.

nutella wrote:Hm, I wonder if Juliet is a regular civ this game or not. In season 3 she pretty much started out as one of the bad guys and then defected to the losties. My instinct is to trust Epi and assume Juliet is a civ role, since it would be a weird/less "safe" role to set up as a fake claim.

Michael was a role in Season 2 who was bad without a fake role to claim. Golden the Coward probably learned his lesson from that and all baddies have fake roles to claim but I still want to try. For instance, Quin hasn't been very clear on whether he is Nikki, Paulo, or both. Inquiring minds want to know.

Hey, a seagull! Claire's been looking for one of those...

Quin wrote:

G-Man wrote:

Quin wrote:According to Lostpedia they had one 'centric' episode, but like 7 overall.

I don't know if you're trying to guess or if I should just tell you

From your description of one centric episode and seven total, coupled with this being Season 3, I'd venture to guess that you are Nikki and/or Paulo. I'd have to check but that sounds about right, as Rose and Bernard had their centric episode in Season 2.

If Nikki, your catch phrase is: "Razzle dazzle!"

If Paulo, you just stand there looking like a lost but devoted puppy dog until your better half shows her true colors and chucks a paralyzing spider on you out of greed.

Either way, you got the short end of the stick this game, unless you've got crazy awesome powrs.

"Acting like you're stupid people..."

Razzle dazzle!

notsawyer540 wrote:About what? I didn't have any suspicions, so I said I was considering voting for INH just because we have differing opinions on aspects of the show. I was mostly dicking around. As far as Quin, that bit's covered in the part you quoted. I misread what Quin wrote and thought that he had said that his role PM didn't specify an alignment because I have a terrible habit of skim reading sometimes.

I do find you suspicious now, however, because of the way your post is addressed toward everyone except me. Seems to me you're trying to convince people to vote for me. If you really had any interest in my response, you would've directed your inquiry about me to me.

Vote DFaraday

G-Man wrote: Hey, being bossy is fun. Maybe we should let Jack and Locke hog all the fun from now on.

nutella wrote:

Quin wrote:we really are vompatti'ing this game aren't we

nutella, have a vote. I want your a conclusive statement of your thoughts on Dom.

I noted that he disappeared and I figured that it was most likely due to RL being busy/he forgot to come back to the game, and now he's responded and more or less confirmed that. As for what that signifies to me about his alignment, it's almost neutral but moderately leaning to vanilla civ because if he had BTSC or an important role he'd probably be more invested and remember to check in.

DFaraday wrote:

G-Man wrote: Hey, being bossy is fun. Maybe we should let Jack and Locke hog all the fun from now on.

That's so Season 2.

Also, why did you vote Nutella?

nutella wrote:Hm, I wonder if Juliet is a regular civ this game or not. In season 3 she pretty much started out as one of the bad guys and then defected to the losties. My instinct is to trust Epi and assume Juliet is a civ role, since it would be a weird/less "safe" role to set up as a fake claim.

S~V~S wrote:I just noticed G Man is not on the poll.

G-Man wrote:

Epignosis wrote:

G-Man wrote:From my notes:

DFaraday = JOHN LOCKE
Dom = ???
Epignosis = ???
G-Man = CHARLIE PACE
notsawyer540 = KATE AUSTEN
nutella = JIN-SOO KWON
Quin = NIKKI FERNANDEZ
S~V~S = CLAIRE LITTLETON
Sorsha = HUGO "HURLEY" REYES
Spacedaisy = ???
Speedchuck = SUN-HWA KWON


thellama73 = DESMOND HUME
insertnamehere = SAYID JARRAH CHARLES WIDMORE

Sure would be nice if we could replace those bloody question marks with names.

I don't understand how I'm ??? at all.

Funny that you didn't bother correcting my false assumption that INH was Juliet. I would have hoped you'd be more forthcoming than that. Perhaps you're not one of us, but rather one of them, hoping for me to discredit myself on a false assumption. Curiouser and curiouser.

G-Man wrote:

DFaraday wrote:

G-Man wrote: Hey, being bossy is fun. Maybe we should let Jack and Locke hog all the fun from now on.

That's so Season 2.

Also, why did you vote Nutella?

For her potentially two-way post:

nutella wrote:Hm, I wonder if Juliet is a regular civ this game or not. In season 3 she pretty much started out as one of the bad guys and then defected to the losties. My instinct is to trust Epi and assume Juliet is a civ role, since it would be a weird/less "safe" role to set up as a fake claim.

Sorry Quin, my vote had bollocks to do with you.

Epignosis wrote:

G-Man wrote:

Epignosis wrote:

G-Man wrote:From my notes:

DFaraday = JOHN LOCKE
Dom = ???
Epignosis = ???
G-Man = CHARLIE PACE
notsawyer540 = KATE AUSTEN
nutella = JIN-SOO KWON
Quin = NIKKI FERNANDEZ
S~V~S = CLAIRE LITTLETON
Sorsha = HUGO "HURLEY" REYES
Spacedaisy = ???
Speedchuck = SUN-HWA KWON


thellama73 = DESMOND HUME
insertnamehere = SAYID JARRAH CHARLES WIDMORE

Sure would be nice if we could replace those bloody question marks with names.

I don't understand how I'm ??? at all.

Funny that you didn't bother correcting my false assumption that INH was Juliet. I would have hoped you'd be more forthcoming than that. Perhaps you're not one of us, but rather one of them, hoping for me to discredit myself on a false assumption. Curiouser and curiouser.

You mean Juliet the TV show critic?

Tell me, dear G: What does this have to do with my alignment?

And how would getting someone's role wrong discredit you? Aren't you confirmed or something?

I'm not sure someone acclimated with the Island should blame me for not getting it.

Spoiler: show

Epignosis wrote:So...how about that coffee?

Epignosis wrote:

S~V~S wrote:

G-Man wrote:Funny, I always recall Jin calling them udders.




You all every Butties...

No, in between gazing adoringly at my baybeeee, I seem to recall an occasional "uzzers" especially in the earlier seasons when his english was worse. Udders came after his English improved.

You had a baby? Congratulations! That's amazing! I've been working on that for ages.

For others.

Others.

Erm.

Epignosis wrote:

Golden wrote:Don't forget that roleplay is by no means mandatory, and role claiming outright is allowed

What about reproducing host PMs? Reproduction is extremely important.

nutella wrote:

G-Man wrote:

DFaraday wrote:

G-Man wrote: Hey, being bossy is fun. Maybe we should let Jack and Locke hog all the fun from now on.

That's so Season 2.

Also, why did you vote Nutella?

For her potentially two-way post:

nutella wrote:Hm, I wonder if Juliet is a regular civ this game or not. In season 3 she pretty much started out as one of the bad guys and then defected to the losties. My instinct is to trust Epi and assume Juliet is a civ role, since it would be a weird/less "safe" role to set up as a fake claim.

Sorry Quin, my vote had bollocks to do with you.

It may be two-way in that I expressed a kind of internal dialogue but within the post I settled on thinking Juliet/Epi is more likely civ.

nutella wrote:It is none of those things. It was me reacting to Epi's role claim and thinking through its implications.

G-Man wrote:

nutella wrote:

G-Man wrote:

DFaraday wrote:

G-Man wrote: Hey, being bossy is fun. Maybe we should let Jack and Locke hog all the fun from now on.

That's so Season 2.

Also, why did you vote Nutella?

For her potentially two-way post:

nutella wrote:Hm, I wonder if Juliet is a regular civ this game or not. In season 3 she pretty much started out as one of the bad guys and then defected to the losties. My instinct is to trust Epi and assume Juliet is a civ role, since it would be a weird/less "safe" role to set up as a fake claim.

Sorry Quin, my vote had bollocks to do with you.

It may be two-way in that I expressed a kind of internal dialogue but within the post I settled on thinking Juliet/Epi is more likely civ.

It's a two-way post if you are a baddie. If you're revealed to be mafia, then this comment is a subtle early blurb that will be scrutinized when ISO'd. If you are bad, this comment is either an attempt to set up Epi, a good civvie player (despite what happened in Blue vs. Red), or you are establishing WIFOM for protecting a teammate by suggesting he is civvie now.

If you're a civvie, then it's just an odd and flawed comment to make. I may or maynot be willing to lynch you to find out.

Spoiler: show

S~V~S wrote:

G-Man wrote:Further more, why wouldn't Nikki/Paulo be just as likely to be a cover as anyone else? If Golden randomized the cover roles again this game, then there's no need to dismiss the notion that Nikki/Paulo could be baddie covers. It would just be a cruel twist of fate that one or two of the most despised characters on Lost got used as cover roles. In fact, it adds a level of meta-WIFOM to it all, now doesn't it?

Hey, being bossy is fun. Maybe we should let Jack and Locke hog all the fun from now on.

Exactly.

You seem to be the one who thinks people are suspect based on their roleplay claims. It seems that you are trying to suspectpeople BASED on their covers, when you say yourself:

If Golden randomized the cover roles again this game

You seem to be the one pushing the thought that this matters. And if Golden randomized it, it doesn't.

DFaraday wrote:

notsawyer540 wrote:About what? I didn't have any suspicions, so I said I was considering voting for INH just because we have differing opinions on aspects of the show. I was mostly dicking around. As far as Quin, that bit's covered in the part you quoted. I misread what Quin wrote and thought that he had said that his role PM didn't specify an alignment because I have a terrible habit of skim reading sometimes.

I do find you suspicious now, however, because of the way your post is addressed toward everyone except me. Seems to me you're trying to convince people to vote for me. If you really had any interest in my response, you would've directed your inquiry about me to me.

Vote DFaraday

Overreaction much? I expressed my thoughts on the subject, then explicitly said I wanted to hear from you. I haven't even voted for you. It was your phrasing more than anything, that whole, "Then I'm definitely considering INH" bit. It made it sound as if you put in more thought than what was essentially a joke vote.

As a side note, lately I've been seeing a lot of "if you were civvie you wouldn't do x" or "a civvie never does y". I'm not a fan.

Dom wrote:

S~V~S wrote:

G-Man wrote:Further more, why wouldn't Nikki/Paulo be just as likely to be a cover as anyone else? If Golden randomized the cover roles again this game, then there's no need to dismiss the notion that Nikki/Paulo could be baddie covers. It would just be a cruel twist of fate that one or two of the most despised characters on Lost got used as cover roles. In fact, it adds a level of meta-WIFOM to it all, now doesn't it?

Hey, being bossy is fun. Maybe we should let Jack and Locke hog all the fun from now on.

Exactly.

You seem to be the one who thinks people are suspect based on their roleplay claims. It seems that you are trying to suspectpeople BASED on their covers, when you say yourself:

If Golden randomized the cover roles again this game

You seem to be the one pushing the thought that this matters. And if Golden randomized it, it doesn't.

Why are you going after G?

DFaraday wrote:

notsawyer540 wrote:About what? I didn't have any suspicions, so I said I was considering voting for INH just because we have differing opinions on aspects of the show. I was mostly dicking around. As far as Quin, that bit's covered in the part you quoted. I misread what Quin wrote and thought that he had said that his role PM didn't specify an alignment because I have a terrible habit of skim reading sometimes.

I do find you suspicious now, however, because of the way your post is addressed toward everyone except me. Seems to me you're trying to convince people to vote for me. If you really had any interest in my response, you would've directed your inquiry about me to me.

Vote DFaraday

Overreaction much? I expressed my thoughts on the subject, then explicitly said I wanted to hear from you. I haven't even voted for you. It was your phrasing more than anything, that whole, "Then I'm definitely considering INH" bit. It made it sound as if you put in more thought than what was essentially a joke vote.

As a side note, lately I've been seeing a lot of "if you were civvie you wouldn't do x" or "a civvie never does y". I'm not a fan.

How do we feel about this?

Not great on my end!

notsawyer540 wrote:About what? I didn't have any suspicions, so I said I was considering voting for INH just because we have differing opinions on aspects of the show. I was mostly dicking around. As far as Quin, that bit's covered in the part you quoted. I misread what Quin wrote and thought that he had said that his role PM didn't specify an alignment because I have a terrible habit of skim reading sometimes.

I do find you suspicious now, however, because of the way your post is addressed toward everyone except me. Seems to me you're trying to convince people to vote for me. If you really had any interest in my response, you would've directed your inquiry about me to me.

Vote DFaraday

Dom wrote:

S~V~S wrote:

G-Man wrote:Further more, why wouldn't Nikki/Paulo be just as likely to be a cover as anyone else? If Golden randomized the cover roles again this game, then there's no need to dismiss the notion that Nikki/Paulo could be baddie covers. It would just be a cruel twist of fate that one or two of the most despised characters on Lost got used as cover roles. In fact, it adds a level of meta-WIFOM to it all, now doesn't it?

Hey, being bossy is fun. Maybe we should let Jack and Locke hog all the fun from now on.

Exactly.

You seem to be the one who thinks people are suspect based on their roleplay claims. It seems that you are trying to suspectpeople BASED on their covers, when you say yourself:

If Golden randomized the cover roles again this game

You seem to be the one pushing the thought that this matters. And if Golden randomized it, it doesn't.

Why are you going after G?

DFaraday wrote:

Dom wrote:

S~V~S wrote:

G-Man wrote:Further more, why wouldn't Nikki/Paulo be just as likely to be a cover as anyone else? If Golden randomized the cover roles again this game, then there's no need to dismiss the notion that Nikki/Paulo could be baddie covers. It would just be a cruel twist of fate that one or two of the most despised characters on Lost got used as cover roles. In fact, it adds a level of meta-WIFOM to it all, now doesn't it?

Hey, being bossy is fun. Maybe we should let Jack and Locke hog all the fun from now on.

Exactly.

You seem to be the one who thinks people are suspect based on their roleplay claims. It seems that you are trying to suspectpeople BASED on their covers, when you say yourself:

If Golden randomized the cover roles again this game

You seem to be the one pushing the thought that this matters. And if Golden randomized it, it doesn't.

Why are you going after G?

DFaraday wrote:

notsawyer540 wrote:About what? I didn't have any suspicions, so I said I was considering voting for INH just because we have differing opinions on aspects of the show. I was mostly dicking around. As far as Quin, that bit's covered in the part you quoted. I misread what Quin wrote and thought that he had said that his role PM didn't specify an alignment because I have a terrible habit of skim reading sometimes.

I do find you suspicious now, however, because of the way your post is addressed toward everyone except me. Seems to me you're trying to convince people to vote for me. If you really had any interest in my response, you would've directed your inquiry about me to me.

Vote DFaraday

Overreaction much? I expressed my thoughts on the subject, then explicitly said I wanted to hear from you. I haven't even voted for you. It was your phrasing more than anything, that whole, "Then I'm definitely considering INH" bit. It made it sound as if you put in more thought than what was essentially a joke vote.

As a side note, lately I've been seeing a lot of "if you were civvie you wouldn't do x" or "a civvie never does y". I'm not a fan.

How do we feel about this?

Not great on my end!

Why's that? He interpreted my statements in the worst light and voted me in the same post.

S~V~S wrote:

Dom wrote:

S~V~S wrote:

G-Man wrote:Further more, why wouldn't Nikki/Paulo be just as likely to be a cover as anyone else? If Golden randomized the cover roles again this game, then there's no need to dismiss the notion that Nikki/Paulo could be baddie covers. It would just be a cruel twist of fate that one or two of the most despised characters on Lost got used as cover roles. In fact, it adds a level of meta-WIFOM to it all, now doesn't it?

Hey, being bossy is fun. Maybe we should let Jack and Locke hog all the fun from now on.

Exactly.

You seem to be the one who thinks people are suspect based on their roleplay claims. It seems that you are trying to suspectpeople BASED on their covers, when you say yourself:

If Golden randomized the cover roles again this game

You seem to be the one pushing the thought that this matters. And if Golden randomized it, it doesn't.

Why are you going after G?

I'm not. I was asking him a question. Question =/= "Going After". His line of suspicion was starting to feel wild tangentish to me.

Although in any case, I also did not realize that that part of the OP was about him, I thought it was flavor until I realized he was not on the poll and Golden explained.

You saw this post but missed that one?

I will prolly vote early since I don't expect to be around tonight.

Dom wrote: What was an appropriate reaction? Did you think there was an appropriate reaction?

DFaraday wrote:Overreaction much? I expressed my thoughts on the subject, then explicitly said I wanted to hear from you. I haven't even voted for you. It was your phrasing more than anything, that whole, "Then I'm definitely considering INH" bit. It made it sound as if you put in more thought than what was essentially a joke vote.

Quin wrote:I'm gonna put a vote on sawyer. This is his response to the poop I flung at him about his INH vote, which isn't directed to me but to somebody who was on board with what I had to say. In the same post he accuses DF and votes for him, which looks like an attempt at deflection. The second paragraph is something that could also be specifically said about me, so why not me?

DFaraday wrote:I'm going to put a vote on Notsawyer for now since I was hoping he would discuss his vote after I responded, and so far he hasn't. That makes it seem all the more out of left field.

notsawyer540 wrote:

DFaraday wrote:Overreaction much? I expressed my thoughts on the subject, then explicitly said I wanted to hear from you. I haven't even voted for you. It was your phrasing more than anything, that whole, "Then I'm definitely considering INH" bit. It made it sound as if you put in more thought than what was essentially a joke vote.

lol I saw my name in that triple or quadruple quote clusterfuck and didn't realize you were replying to Quin and not me. I thought you were replying to me directly, but addressing it toward everyone else. But I'm keeping my vote on you and I'll explain why in a sec.

Quin wrote:I'm gonna put a vote on sawyer. This is his response to the poop I flung at him about his INH vote, which isn't directed to me but to somebody who was on board with what I had to say. In the same post he accuses DF and votes for him, which looks like an attempt at deflection. The second paragraph is something that could also be specifically said about me, so why not me?

I didn't notice that you were one of the people slinging that garbage. I just saw that multiple people said something, but from my perspective DF was pushing for it kind of oddly. Hard to explain, but it was a gut feeling.

DFaraday wrote:I'm going to put a vote on Notsawyer for now since I was hoping he would discuss his vote after I responded, and so far he hasn't. That makes it seem all the more out of left field.

No. You were hoping someone else would vote for me first and you got it. I never said I wouldn't change my vote for you, but your overreaction and the way you waited until Quin voted for me first has me convinced that keeping my vote on you is the right call.