The Syndicate

Posted: **Fri Apr 01, 2016 11:38 am**

Long Con wrote:
thellama73 wrote:
Long Con wrote:
DrWilgy wrote:
Long Con wrote:
Long Con wrote:Quin is a bit suspicious to me. Looks a little like he jumped on Wilgy when the temperature started to heat up a tiny bit.
I didn't like his reactions to some things during my catchup read.
What do you think of Scotty?

What do you think of Long Con?
I think Scotty is Civ. I think Long Con is a dangerous man to mess with. And also, Long Con is a Civ, so stop trying to lynch him please.
Long Con, you are always so tricksy. I hope you are not tricking me today.
I haven't even done anything, I have no tricks to play. And I'm not really that tricksy, I don't know why people like to spread that rumour. Don't let the name fool you, it was invented for different reasons before I started playing Mafia.

Denying you are triscky is the tricksiest think you have done. No one more consistently fools me in this game than you, except maybe DharmaHelper.

Posted: **Fri Apr 01, 2016 12:14 pm**

Putting my vote on thellama

thellama73 wrote:
S~V~S wrote:
thellama73 wrote:Both Matt and Long Con are reading Civ to me, so I find Wilgy's accusation of chaos on LC weird. I guess I could vote for Wilgy today, but Sloonei still has my eye.
Why Sloonei? I see nothing alarming there.
I just thought Sloonei's reaction to my criticism of the no lynch option (which I make in basically every game) was a little defensive and OTT. It's only a slight ping, but I don't have anything much stronger to go on right now.

This is the only post I've made that touches on the no lynch discussion at all:

Sloonei wrote:Let's stop talking about no lynches now. Guess what movie I watched last night instead.

Where's the overreaction to llama's involvement? What I did react to, however, was llama's extremely vague comment that Sloonei seems "a little off" as an extrenely weak way of stating a suspicion. He brushed it off by saying it's Day 1, and now he's backing up the suspicion again here with something that is entirely false. The Llama ain't looking good here.

Posted: **Fri Apr 01, 2016 12:26 pm**

thellama73 wrote:
Long Con wrote:
thellama73 wrote:
Long Con wrote:
DrWilgy wrote:
Long Con wrote:
Long Con wrote:Quin is a bit suspicious to me. Looks a little like he jumped on Wilgy when the temperature started to heat up a tiny bit.
I didn't like his reactions to some things during my catchup read.
What do you think of Scotty?

What do you think of Long Con?
I think Scotty is Civ. I think Long Con is a dangerous man to mess with. And also, Long Con is a Civ, so stop trying to lynch him please.
Long Con, you are always so tricksy. I hope you are not tricking me today.
I haven't even done anything, I have no tricks to play. And I'm not really that tricksy, I don't know why people like to spread that rumour. Don't let the name fool you, it was invented for different reasons before I started playing Mafia.
Denying you are triscky is the tricksiest think you have done. No one more consistently fools me in this game than you, except maybe DharmaHelper.

If this is the tricksiest thing I've ever done, then the complete absence of trickery employed by me in this game surely exonerates me of any previous trickery.

Posted: **Fri Apr 01, 2016 1:08 pm**

Long Con wrote: If this is the tricksiest thing I've ever done, then the complete absence of trickery employed by me in this game surely exonerates me of any previous trickery.

Well played, sir.

Posted: **Fri Apr 01, 2016 1:13 pm**

What are you hoping to achieve with this exchange, Gollama?

Posted: **Fri Apr 01, 2016 1:33 pm**

Sloonei wrote:What are you hoping to achieve with this exchange, Gollama?

Which exchange, the one with Long Con?

Posted: **Fri Apr 01, 2016 1:35 pm**

thellama73 wrote:
Sloonei wrote:What are you hoping to achieve with this exchange, Gollama?
Which exchange, the one with Long Con?

Yes. Calling him tricksy just seems to be planting seeds of doubt for no real purpose, and I am not sensing any sort of attempt to scum hunt or actually read him. Is it just banter for the sake of banter?

Posted: **Fri Apr 01, 2016 1:36 pm**

Sloonei wrote:
thellama73 wrote:
Sloonei wrote:What are you hoping to achieve with this exchange, Gollama?
Which exchange, the one with Long Con?
Yes. Calling him tricksy just seems to be planting seeds of doubt for no real purpose, and I am not sensing any sort of attempt to scum hunt or actually read him. Is it just banter for the sake of banter?

He is tricksy. He has tricked me before. It is a fact. I am hoping I am reading him correctly this game, but there are no guarantees of that.

You seem to have a problem with pretty much everything I'm posting. Would you prefer I post less? I happen to think there are many things that can be achieved by conversation in the thread.

Posted: **Fri Apr 01, 2016 1:40 pm**

thellama73 wrote:
Sloonei wrote:
thellama73 wrote:
Sloonei wrote:What are you hoping to achieve with this exchange, Gollama?
Which exchange, the one with Long Con?
Yes. Calling him tricksy just seems to be planting seeds of doubt for no real purpose, and I am not sensing any sort of attempt to scum hunt or actually read him. Is it just banter for the sake of banter?
He is tricksy. He has tricked me before. It is a fact. I am hoping I am reading him correctly this game, but there are no guarantees of that.

You seem to have a problem with pretty much everything I'm posting. Would you prefer I post less? I happen to think there are many things that can be achieved by conversation in the thread.

Thank you for reminding us that Day 1 reads are not guarantees of anything. Care to address my mini case on you a few posts above us?

Posted: **Fri Apr 01, 2016 2:13 pm**

Can I get any opinions at all on this post? I think llama looks bad as far as Day 1 goes, but it's always good to have multiple perspectives.

Posted: **Fri Apr 01, 2016 2:22 pm**

Sloonei wrote:Putting my vote on thellama
thellama73 wrote:
S~V~S wrote:
thellama73 wrote:Both Matt and Long Con are reading Civ to me, so I find Wilgy's accusation of chaos on LC weird. I guess I could vote for Wilgy today, but Sloonei still has my eye.
Why Sloonei? I see nothing alarming there.
I just thought Sloonei's reaction to my criticism of the no lynch option (which I make in basically every game) was a little defensive and OTT. It's only a slight ping, but I don't have anything much stronger to go on right now.
This is the only post I've made that touches on the no lynch discussion at all:
Sloonei wrote:Let's stop talking about no lynches now. Guess what movie I watched last night instead.
Where's the overreaction to llama's involvement? What I did react to, however, was llama's extremely vague comment that Sloonei seems "a little off" as an extrenely weak way of stating a suspicion. He brushed it off by saying it's Day 1, and now he's backing up the suspicion again here with something that is entirely false. The Llama ain't looking good here.

I disagree with llama here, and I dislike his accusation. However, I'm unsure if this makes him mafia. It does seem like he could've been trying to set you up, but as I said I'm not sure if that is the case.

@Wilgy do you want to get lynched day 1?

Posted: **Fri Apr 01, 2016 2:25 pm**

Sloonei wrote:
thellama73 wrote:
Sloonei wrote:
thellama73 wrote:
Sloonei wrote:What are you hoping to achieve with this exchange, Gollama?
Which exchange, the one with Long Con?
Yes. Calling him tricksy just seems to be planting seeds of doubt for no real purpose, and I am not sensing any sort of attempt to scum hunt or actually read him. Is it just banter for the sake of banter?
He is tricksy. He has tricked me before. It is a fact. I am hoping I am reading him correctly this game, but there are no guarantees of that.

You seem to have a problem with pretty much everything I'm posting. Would you prefer I post less? I happen to think there are many things that can be achieved by conversation in the thread.
Thank you for reminding us that Day 1 reads are not guarantees of anything. Care to address my mini case on you a few posts above us?

It doesn't really seem worth my time, but it does appear that I misspoke. When I mentioned your defensiveness, I was referring to your reaction to me saying you were "a little off", not based on No Lynch Discussion. I think I was confusing ou with Soneji. So yes, in that respect I was wrong.

Posted: **Fri Apr 01, 2016 2:37 pm**

I wasn't being defensive. I was accusing you of submitting a very weak read. That it happened to be against me is mostly irrelevant. "A little off" means absolutely nothing. Stating that a player is "a little off" and then forgetting why you supposedly thought that to be the case is a highly suspicious thing, imo, especially for Day 1. I like where my vote is. I have to leave for work in less than an hour and won't be back before the end of day, so it looks like that's final. I encourage others to continue looking into this particular llama.

Posted: **Fri Apr 01, 2016 2:40 pm**

Also why would you say it doesn't seem worth your time? You just admitted that I pointed out a legitimate inconsistency in your posts, and you brushed it off as not being worth your time, implying it is inconsequential that you stated an inconsistency in the thread. But then you proceeded to respond to it anyway.

Posted: **Fri Apr 01, 2016 2:56 pm**

Hueheh heh... Issok Sloon.

Let's lynch LC! Then G-Man followed by Llama.

Posted: **Fri Apr 01, 2016 2:58 pm**

sig wrote:
Sloonei wrote:Putting my vote on thellama
thellama73 wrote:
S~V~S wrote:
thellama73 wrote:Both Matt and Long Con are reading Civ to me, so I find Wilgy's accusation of chaos on LC weird. I guess I could vote for Wilgy today, but Sloonei still has my eye.
Why Sloonei? I see nothing alarming there.
I just thought Sloonei's reaction to my criticism of the no lynch option (which I make in basically every game) was a little defensive and OTT. It's only a slight ping, but I don't have anything much stronger to go on right now.
This is the only post I've made that touches on the no lynch discussion at all:
Sloonei wrote:Let's stop talking about no lynches now. Guess what movie I watched last night instead.
Where's the overreaction to llama's involvement? What I did react to, however, was llama's extremely vague comment that Sloonei seems "a little off" as an extrenely weak way of stating a suspicion. He brushed it off by saying it's Day 1, and now he's backing up the suspicion again here with something that is entirely false. The Llama ain't looking good here.
I disagree with llama here, and I dislike his accusation. However, I'm unsure if this makes him mafia. It does seem like he could've been trying to set you up, but as I said I'm not sure if that is the case.

@Wilgy do you want to get lynched day 1?

That would be funny. Very very detrimental to the civ cause...

Posted: **Fri Apr 01, 2016 3:13 pm**

I do not get why you or anyone else wants to lynch Long Con (as always) but I don't have time to explore it at all today.

Posted: **Fri Apr 01, 2016 3:14 pm**

Sloonei wrote:Also why would you say it doesn't seem worth your time? You just admitted that I pointed out a legitimate inconsistency in your posts, and you brushed it off as not being worth your time, implying it is inconsequential that you stated an inconsistency in the thread. But then you proceeded to respond to it anyway.

I just don't feel like this conversation with you is productive. You claim you weren't being defensive, fine, but to me it seems like you were. It's a matter of opinion and we're not going to agree on it. I feel like you are not actually listening to my posts, but just using them to attack me, so I'm not getting much out of that. I know you're going to vote for me anyway, so I would rather spend my time talking to some of the other players now, particularly the quieter ones who I have yet to hear much from.

Posted: **Fri Apr 01, 2016 3:16 pm**

DrWilgy wrote:Hueheh heh... Issok Sloon.

Let's lynch LC! Then G-Man followed by Llama.

No thank you. I am considering Llama as a final vote though. I think Sloon makes some good points, and I do have deep-seated issues about baddies buddying me... which, if Llama is bad, he is certainly doing.

Posted: **Fri Apr 01, 2016 3:18 pm**

Hey wilgy, stop self-voting.

Posted: **Fri Apr 01, 2016 3:19 pm**

Llama, I see you moved to Wilgy, for his accusation of chaos on LC, I assume, since that was your last mention of him?

How is accusing LC of "chaos" different than accusing him of being "tricksy"?

Posted: **Fri Apr 01, 2016 3:20 pm**

EBWOP, I mean to say isn't it kind of the same thing?

Posted: **Fri Apr 01, 2016 3:23 pm**

I'm voting Dom for now, since he seems to be posting a lot without contributing many thoughts.

Posted: **Fri Apr 01, 2016 3:26 pm**

S~V~S wrote:Llama, I see you moved to Wilgy, for his accusation of chaos on LC, I assume, since that was your last mention of him?

How is accusing LC of "chaos" different than accusing him of being "tricksy"?

Tricksy was not a criticism of his behavior this game, it was a description of his personality in general. My second reference where I singled out one of his posts was just a joke. I am not voting Wilgy purely for his LC suspicion, but because I prefer a Wilgy lynch to the other major candidates. Now that the votes seem to be spreading out, though, I may change as well.

Posted: **Fri Apr 01, 2016 3:27 pm**

Why Wilgy?

Posted: **Fri Apr 01, 2016 3:28 pm**

S~V~S wrote:Why Wilgy?

Because I trusted him least out of him, Matt and LC, who were leading candidates at the time I voted. As I said, now that that is no longer the case, I may change again.

Posted: **Fri Apr 01, 2016 3:29 pm**

*Pulls Teeth*

I mean WHY do you trust Wilgy leasy? You did not mention him at all, except for the chaos thing, before voting for him.

Posted: **Fri Apr 01, 2016 3:30 pm**

Valium's like whoa
Surgery postponed two months
First shot did me in

Posted: **Fri Apr 01, 2016 3:31 pm**

Starting my re-read
I will post on each player
Once I am finished

Posted: **Fri Apr 01, 2016 3:31 pm**

S~V~S wrote:*Pulls Teeth*

I mean WHY do you trust Wilgy leasy? You did not mention him at all, except for the chaos thing, before voting for him.

Trust has to be earned. He has not earned mine.

Posted: **Fri Apr 01, 2016 3:32 pm**

Wow.

No chance of me moving my vote today.

Posted: **Fri Apr 01, 2016 3:37 pm**

I mean, you are posting alot, which I like. And I am trying to work with you, and you refuse to work with me. I am looking for reasons to trust *you* and you are just blowing me off like an annoying puppy.

Posted: **Fri Apr 01, 2016 3:42 pm**

Long Con wrote:
DrWilgy wrote:
Long Con wrote:Sweet idea. Let's do it. Scotty, you go first.
Non commital chaos seeding. LC's probably bad.
Non-committal chaos seeding is not what I was doing here. I was daring Scotty to go through with it in more of a sarcastic way, because it seemed like a foolish thing to do, to flaunt the no role-outing rule. WTF is chaos seeding anyway?

Quin is a bit suspicious to me. Looks a little like he jumped on Wilgy when the temperature started to heat up a tiny bit.

I liked Sloonei's points against Llama, there were several little things that just looked a bit suspicious on their own, but together made Llama into a viable lynch candidate in my books.

DrWilgy wrote:LC's little contributions were that of chaos.
There's that chaos accusation again. This is the pot calling the white china tea kettle black.

I don't think I'm ready to lynch sig Day 1. I feel like I have seen it too often on sig, and I'd rather see him go later into the game.

Sorry for being a bit absent, I'll be here more often from now on.

Off topic - How do you know you weren't doing it if you don't know what it is?

Dead - So you definitely wanna see sig go later in the game then?

Long Con

Posted: **Fri Apr 01, 2016 3:45 pm**

I've yet to vote for my top suspect, sig, but I suspect I may before I go to work.

As for Long Con, the "off topic" part is stretching perhaps, but I'd like some clarification on his "i'd rather see sig go later in the game" comment fo sho.

Posted: **Fri Apr 01, 2016 3:56 pm**

S~V~S wrote:I mean, you are posting alot, which I like. And I am trying to work with you, and you refuse to work with me. I am looking for reasons to trust *you* and you are just blowing me off like an annoying puppy.

I am more than happy to work with you, SVS! You know that. I just don't know how to answer the questions you're asking me. I trust WIlgy less than Long Con and Matt. I just do. I can't explain why.

Posted: **Fri Apr 01, 2016 4:34 pm**

We are back home from our mini vacation. I'm exhausted and injured, but had a wonderful time

. I will catch up now.

Posted: **Fri Apr 01, 2016 4:38 pm**

Done with my re-read
Some interesting stuff there
Will post haiku soon

Posted: **Fri Apr 01, 2016 4:42 pm**

Bubbles has two posts
Always wary of tactic
Neutral 'til more posts

Posted: **Fri Apr 01, 2016 4:44 pm**

DFarady just
One post Day 1; spat with Dom
Always a hard read

Posted: **Fri Apr 01, 2016 4:45 pm**

I've done nothing worth getting lynched over, Matt is being crazy and the fact LC is entertaining my lynch based around a day zero jokey post speaks for itself.

Posted: **Fri Apr 01, 2016 4:46 pm**

Elohcin wrote:We are back home from our mini vacation. I'm exhausted and injured, but had a wonderful time . I will catch up now.

Looking forward to your input, Eloh. What do you think of Wilgy, Long Con, Matt, Sloonei, and Soreji in particular?

Posted: **Fri Apr 01, 2016 4:47 pm**

sig wrote:I've done nothing worth getting lynched over, Matt is being crazy and the fact LC is entertaining my lynch based around a day zero jokey post speaks for itself.

See, this reads false to me. It sounds like baddie's I've seen who are mad at being caught for the wrong reasons.

Posted: **Fri Apr 01, 2016 4:49 pm**

Dom posts lots of fluff
But some strong questions in there
Leaning positive

Posted: **Fri Apr 01, 2016 4:50 pm**

Wilgette is getting
The benefit of the doubt
From me for Day 1

Posted: **Fri Apr 01, 2016 4:52 pm**

thellama73 wrote:
sig wrote:I've done nothing worth getting lynched over, Matt is being crazy and the fact LC is entertaining my lynch based around a day zero jokey post speaks for itself.
See, this reads false to me. It sounds like baddie's I've seen who are mad at being caught for the wrong reasons.

Nah I'm not mad, more like bemused. My record shows that as civ I've done things in the past that can be seen as worth lynching over, but making a joke about me being the only player to vote for the fly? It was a joke, to make it seem like something else is just weird.

Posted: **Fri Apr 01, 2016 4:56 pm**

Wilgy aggressive
Not a fan of steering tries
Lynch result will help

Posted: **Fri Apr 01, 2016 4:58 pm**

Elochin absent
No fan of "I'm catching up"
Will cut slack today

Posted: **Fri Apr 01, 2016 5:01 pm**

Haiku posts make for
Easy catch-up reading, no?
G-Man is awesome

Posted: **Fri Apr 01, 2016 5:02 pm**

Gman can you tell me what you think about Matt's thoughts on me?

Posted: **Fri Apr 01, 2016 5:05 pm**

Long Con is tricksey
Not worried about him yet
Not trusting either

The Syndicate

Spirited Away Mafia [ENDGAME]

Re: Spirited Away Mafia [DAY 0]

Re: Spirited Away Mafia [DAY 1]

Re: Spirited Away Mafia [DAY 0]

Re: Spirited Away Mafia [DAY 0]

Re: Spirited Away Mafia [DAY 1]

Re: Spirited Away Mafia [DAY 1]

Re: Spirited Away Mafia [DAY 1]

Re: Spirited Away Mafia [DAY 1]

Re: Spirited Away Mafia [DAY 1]

Re: Spirited Away Mafia [DAY 1]

Re: Spirited Away Mafia [DAY 1]

Re: Spirited Away Mafia [DAY 1]

Re: Spirited Away Mafia [DAY 1]

Re: Spirited Away Mafia [DAY 1]

Re: Spirited Away Mafia [DAY 1]

Re: Spirited Away Mafia [DAY 1]

Re: Spirited Away Mafia [DAY 1]

Re: Spirited Away Mafia [DAY 1]

Re: Spirited Away Mafia [DAY 1]

Re: Spirited Away Mafia [DAY 1]

Re: Spirited Away Mafia [DAY 1]

Re: Spirited Away Mafia [DAY 1]

Re: Spirited Away Mafia [DAY 1]

Re: Spirited Away Mafia [DAY 1]

Re: Spirited Away Mafia [DAY 1]

Re: Spirited Away Mafia [DAY 1]

Re: Spirited Away Mafia [DAY 1]

Re: Spirited Away Mafia [DAY 1]

Re: Spirited Away Mafia [DAY 1]

Re: Spirited Away Mafia [DAY 1]

Re: Spirited Away Mafia [DAY 1]

Re: Spirited Away Mafia [DAY 1]

Re: Spirited Away Mafia [DAY 0]

Re: Spirited Away Mafia [DAY 1]

Re: Spirited Away Mafia [DAY 1]

Re: Spirited Away Mafia [DAY 1]

Re: Spirited Away Mafia [DAY 1]

Re: Spirited Away Mafia [DAY 1]

Re: Spirited Away Mafia [DAY 1]

Re: Spirited Away Mafia [DAY 1]

Re: Spirited Away Mafia [DAY 1]

Re: Spirited Away Mafia [DAY 1]

Re: Spirited Away Mafia [DAY 1]

Re: Spirited Away Mafia [DAY 1]

Re: Spirited Away Mafia [DAY 1]

Re: Spirited Away Mafia [DAY 1]

Re: Spirited Away Mafia [DAY 1]

Re: Spirited Away Mafia [DAY 1]

Re: Spirited Away Mafia [DAY 1]

Re: Spirited Away Mafia [DAY 1]