The Syndicate

I also have decided not to play along with Dennis' little mind games. I do not trust his motives.

juliets wrote:

juliets wrote: And Dana, hahahaha, I hope you go to a football school!

Dana wrote:I honestly have no idea. I biked around campus earlier and there were big groups of people in the fields but I wasn't interested enough to go and see what was up. Is it like championships or something today?

Dana i forgot you live in the northeast. Football really isn't as big a deal up there so I can understand how you've gone all this time not knowing really what football is. Never mind my comment, you'll find out soon enough if you go to one of the big northern football schools!Oh, and it's only the second game of the college season, first game weekend for the pro's. Championships will be in Jan. - Feb.

I live in Tallahassee, and yesterday was positively insane. Also, a bit awkward because I went to UF.

thellama73 wrote:I also have decided not to play along with Dennis' little mind games. I do not trust his motives.

Long Con wrote:I understand that Made has to be lynched, but if there were wagers on the outcome, I would put a small bet on him being the Civvie role that A Person's lynch alludes to. A small bet, as in I'm not super confident, but I still kind of think it.

Too much reasonable doubt though.

So you think that maybe the secrets to AP's role are that he would sacrifice himself for the surival of Lancelot? That fits with the movie description. I am actually very inclined to believe this.

This would mean that Made is Sir Lancelot though. Hmm...

Made wrote:

Long Con wrote:I understand that Made has to be lynched, but if there were wagers on the outcome, I would put a small bet on him being the Civvie role that A Person's lynch alludes to. A small bet, as in I'm not super confident, but I still kind of think it.

Too much reasonable doubt though.

Ok this argument is the type of argument any mafia can get behind. It's hedging your bet. If I flip mafia, then they voted me so they're happy they voted me, but when i flip civvie, they're safe from criticism as they believed I was civvie the entire time.

If you think that I am less suspicious than someone else, then pursue that person and vote for them. Don't just vote to kill a civvie. It shouldn't matter if I come up in discussion. In any other game, If you thought someone was suspicious, but another person thinks someone else is suspicious, you don't agree to have them lynched to prove them wrong??? If other's are misguided, push forward your theory instead. A civvies most powerful tool is their vote, and if Mafia can take that from them, then civvies lose all power and mafia wins.


Mafia isn't going to start cooperating and listening to town because i'm dead.

There are easily enough doubter to keep me alive, but even if you don't see me as innocent enough to vote to save me, vote who you think is guilty.

MM, Canuck, BWT, LC, and Bullz: Either admit I am mafia and vote for me, or vote who you think mafia is.

(Also i still need Who people think is suspicious if(when) I flip civvie. I only have them from llama(SVS) and Dana(Llama), and I already directly asked MM and Canuck.)

Made, I do think you are very suspicious. I have said so countless times since Day 1. I have voted you every single day (though may Day 2 vote changed later to Enrique). The thing that is making me less suspicious now is some game mechanic logic, NOT from your playing. I'm really uncertain as to what you are asking of me (and everyone else) in this post.

Metalmarsh89 wrote:

Long Con wrote:I understand that Made has to be lynched, but if there were wagers on the outcome, I would put a small bet on him being the Civvie role that A Person's lynch alludes to. A small bet, as in I'm not super confident, but I still kind of think it.

Too much reasonable doubt though.

So you think that maybe the secrets to AP's role are that he would sacrifice himself for the surival of Lancelot? That fits with the movie description. I am actually very inclined to believe this.

This would mean that Made is Sir Lancelot though. Hmm...

Made wrote:

Long Con wrote:I understand that Made has to be lynched, but if there were wagers on the outcome, I would put a small bet on him being the Civvie role that A Person's lynch alludes to. A small bet, as in I'm not super confident, but I still kind of think it.

Too much reasonable doubt though.

Ok this argument is the type of argument any mafia can get behind. It's hedging your bet. If I flip mafia, then they voted me so they're happy they voted me, but when i flip civvie, they're safe from criticism as they believed I was civvie the entire time.

If you think that I am less suspicious than someone else, then pursue that person and vote for them. Don't just vote to kill a civvie. It shouldn't matter if I come up in discussion. In any other game, If you thought someone was suspicious, but another person thinks someone else is suspicious, you don't agree to have them lynched to prove them wrong??? If other's are misguided, push forward your theory instead. A civvies most powerful tool is their vote, and if Mafia can take that from them, then civvies lose all power and mafia wins.


Mafia isn't going to start cooperating and listening to town because i'm dead.

There are easily enough doubter to keep me alive, but even if you don't see me as innocent enough to vote to save me, vote who you think is guilty.

MM, Canuck, BWT, LC, and Bullz: Either admit I am mafia and vote for me, or vote who you think mafia is.

(Also i still need Who people think is suspicious if(when) I flip civvie. I only have them from llama(SVS) and Dana(Llama), and I already directly asked MM and Canuck.)

Made, I do think you are very suspicious. I have said so countless times since Day 1. I have voted you every single day (though may Day 2 vote changed later to Enrique). The thing that is making me less suspicious now is some game mechanic logic, NOT from your playing. I'm really uncertain as to what you are asking of me (and everyone else) in this post.

Basically, I just wanted those who voted for me to repeat(or say for the first time) that they think I'm the most suspicious so they don't get any undeserved advantage at my death.

I'm going to vote now so that I can go get my book shopping done.

Made, I was willing to give you the benifit of the doubt toward your wacky behavior in the thread at the begining of the game because I've played with wacky players before. I know their behavior gets them unjustly lynched early and often especially when they are new to our circle and we are learning to adjust our reads of them.

When A person was lynched instead of you, I tried to figure out how you could still be civ despite a very incriminating switch. You have said that you and A person did not share a lovers role.

I took a leap of faith and followed your lead and Keterman's 11th hour rally that lynching you was a mistake and voted for MR - and we lost another civ.

Your most vocal defender, Enrique, was NKed and revealed a recruited baddie.

You suspect your accusers, you suspect your defenders, you suspect everyone anTypd expect everyone to trust you without giving them any reason to trust them.

No one. I mean, no one has any idea how you could at his point still be a civ and not be lancalot, and I've damn near driven myself crazy trying to justify how you could not be lancalot and still be a civ.

Typing all that out makes me feel more sure, not less that voting you is the right thing to do.

I'm sorry made as I genuinely enjoy the zany players, but I can't keep trying to do the mental gymnastics required to try to find the 1 and a million way you can be a civ all on my own dispite the evidence stated above.

votes Made

Made wrote:

LoRab wrote:

Made wrote:Either admit I am mafia

Just saying.

It's cool. I'm Made, so I'm allowed to say stuff like that. Also, nice to finally meet you. I love your emotion!

I assume that was autocorrect for emoticon, lol. And thank you. Pleasure to meet you, as well!!

Even if I think you're bad.

I'm not hedging my bet, I'm just saying it's still likely you're Lancelot, and are denying it to protect yourself from night kills. But I'm not at all confident that I'm right about that, and I'm done thinking about it.

I don't expect any accolades or anything if I'm right.

Votes Made.

Ugh.

Why ugh?

Civvie or mafia, well played Llama.

CIVVIE, BE AGGRESSIVE AND MAKE SURE YOU'RE HEARD DAMN IT!!!

Made has expired and gone to meet his maker! (hehe) He was Sir Lancelot, a civ!

Night 4 has begun.

birdwithteeth11 wrote:Why ugh?

^ That's why.

Well. That happened.

Hmmmm...well dammit. RIP Made!

The good news of this is that I know where to go tomorrow.

What is the capital of Assyria? (hosts, deads, nons etc.)

Assyria is no longer in existence, thus it currently has no capital.

Alternative answer:

What is the capital of Assyria? (hosts, deads, nons etc.)

"A"

Well Danny, Occam was right. I thought he might have been playing it cool on the Lancelot front in order to save himself from immediate nightkill.

Either that, or he was a Seemer.

I still think he was bad and nothing will convince me otherwise.

13 votes....pretty sure that means I won. See you all in the Game of Champions


gg all. Great game Dispor/Roxy

thellama73 wrote:I still think he was bad and nothing will convince me otherwise.

So you're in S~V~S' camp, and believe he was some Seemed type... How do you feel about her now?

Good Question~ I believe he must have been Lancelot, as no one else really protested that idea. Had he shown up as any other role, i would have doubted, but not this role.

Long Con wrote:

thellama73 wrote:I still think he was bad and nothing will convince me otherwise.

So you're in S~V~S' camp, and believe he was some Seemed type... How do you feel about her now?

Oh she is a Baddie McBadderson all right.

thellama73 wrote:

Long Con wrote:

thellama73 wrote:I still think he was bad and nothing will convince me otherwise.

So you're in S~V~S' camp, and believe he was some Seemed type... How do you feel about her now?

Oh she is a Baddie McBadderson all right.

Agreed.

So I have one set suspecting me for backing off of Made, and one for not cutting hinm enough slack, is that it?

Like I said, I think there are two baddie teams.

nijuukyugou wrote:

birdwithteeth11 wrote:Why ugh?

^ That's why.

So drama. And you tried so hard to prevent it, didn't you?

S~V~S wrote:So I have one set suspecting me for backing off of Made, and one for not cutting hinm enough slack, is that it?

Like I said, I think there are two baddie teams.

It does seem a bit unfair. Before Made flipped, I was thinking about what various outcomes would mean for my read on you. If Made flips bad, I thought, then I think you are bad for the way you said "I think he is bad but I don't want to lynch him" and various other reasons. On the other hand, if Made flips good, you look equally bad for pushing the "seemer" role idea with no evidence and for your eagerness to lynch him early and late in the game.

There was really no outcome that would make me think you are good, and I feel bad about that, but I still think you are bad.

S~V~S wrote:So I have one set suspecting me for backing off of Made, and one for not cutting hinm enough slack, is that it?

Like I said, I think there are two baddie teams.

I suspect you for reasons I have made clear... Others catching up to that is just... Validation.

Well then, since I am to be lynched since I am so apparently bad (and watch LC & Llama turn on each other the next day ) I will bow out. Perhaps my death will be more illuminating to the civs than endless days of arguing with me.

S~V~S wrote:Well then, since I am to be lynched since I am so apparently bad (and watch LC & Llama turn on each other the next day ) I will bow out. Perhaps my death will be more illuminating to the civs than endless days of arguing with me.

I suspect LC plenty. He is next on my list after you, to be sure.

But after you make common cause and rid yourselves of me, OK.

Night

I love suspicion, I live for suspicion. Llama is cool in my books, I have no plans of turning on him. He's riding my coattails on the S~V~S suspicion anyway.

Long Con wrote:I love suspicion, I live for suspicion. Llama is cool in my books, I have no plans of turning on him. He's riding my coattails on the S~V~S suspicion anyway.

Nuh uh. I suspected her before you did. :P

RIP Made i apologize for my poor judgement in voting for you. I just couldn't get past that lynch switch.

S~V~S you cannot just quit if you are civ - it will mean one less of us and that's the last thing we need.

juliets wrote:RIP Made i apologize for my poor judgement in voting for you. I just couldn't get past that lynch switch.

S~V~S you cannot just quit if you are civ - it will mean one less of us and that's the last thing we need.

I am not quitting. But sometimes, especially in a game like this where roles are not revealed until after death, a persons death may actually shed more light on a situation, rather that fighting endlessly and derailing the thread. So I am not going to argue too hard, and hopefully people will see what is happening for what it really is. But if not, they will after I die

Plus remember that no civs have died in the night, it is not as dire as it looks. The civs can take this game back, but they have to be able to see past the bullshit.

Also, thanks LORB. I think.

Nobody expects the Spanish Inquisition.

Also:

LoRab wrote:Nobody expects the Spanish Inquisition.

Also:

Yes, they were quite evil and horrible as religious zealots usually are, imo.

seriously? For real? <------Icon not directed at anyone but myself.

RIP Made.

FYI my fellow mafia players, I stated at the beginning of the game (at least I meant to) and I'm re-iterating now. I'm going out of town tomorrow morning and will not be back till sometime late Thurs afternoon. I will not be able to follow the game while I am gone as I will not have internet access. I'm so very sorry for the inconvenience.

Well, God doesn't want you dead, so I may have to have a rethink. Although it would not be the first time he steered me wrong.

Also, did you know the Spanish Inquisition gave you two weeks notice before visiting you? Awfully decent of them, I'd say.

Actually, thirty days.

thellama73 wrote:Actually, thirty days.

That's fair, you had a whole month to you know, clean out the house, get rid of all of your false idols, sell out your beliefs and learn the lingo of the "right and proper religion."

Totally sweet of them really.

oh - also - I voted "To seek the grail!!"

OK SVS I see what you are saying now.

Also, I'm voting favorite color. Are we supposed to tell what it is?

DisPor did the poll, it says "favourite colour", not "favorite color". It is spelled the Canadian way.

Mine is aqua.

S~V~S wrote:DisPor did the poll, it says "favourite colour", not "favorite color". It is spelled the Canadian way.

Mine is aqua.

Yes, it is spelled the Earth way, minus the United States.

Mine is indigo, followed closely by aqua.