The Syndicate

bea wrote:

Enrique wrote:@Hosts: Are Dalek/Cyberman #1's roles "Block a player nightly?"

Surprised we haven't got that one yet.

I don't do hangman's sorry. that's totally teefies bag baby....

Chris wrote:

Chris wrote:

MovingPictures07 wrote:Also, I specifically JUST SAID if someone wants to peg me as Daleks or Master, sure, but they'd be wrong. I'm not using anything as "proof" that I'm good. I'm not telling anyone to accept anything.

I'm saying:

Fact. I survived an NK from the Cybermen. I claim to know why I survived. Fact, no one else has done so. Therefore, I am less likely to be bad than anyone else right now.

I don't suppose you're going to share with us exactly how you survived, will you?

It's really easy to make a claim when you have no plans to back that claim up with any sort of proof.

This is my favorite post of MPs...



HOSTS: If the Cybermen targeted The Cyber Controller with their team kill before they were all dead, would he survive the kill attempt?

bea wrote:Chris does win a few kiss up points though. Shakedown is my fav dead song. *starts youtube*

Chris wrote:

bea wrote:Chris does win a few kiss up points though. Shakedown is my fav dead song. *starts youtube*

Just as planned...

But seriously, if you look back at my posts from just an hour or so ago, I quoted it.

I asked if a team member can target someone from the same team and purposely have it fail. The answer was no.

But tonight I asked an entirely different question...

It's ok, I know the answer is yes.

Enrique wrote:

Black Rock wrote:Alright slowly catching up and trying to stay current.

A few thoughts on players.

Daisy seems genuine to me, I am leaning civvie here.

Enrique reads baddie to me, once again that's where my vote will probably go.

MP, I'm feeling pretty neutral about him right now. I'm not seeing anything baddie here, just pushy.

I am going to look into Epigs voters posts as well. I feel like there was a last minute push in his direction and I personally did not see why he was so suspicious. Last day is the last I need to completely catch up on so I feel like I am working with full info here.

Linki: Gotrees, how does it make him more suspicious? I might be missing something here.

I want BR to say stuff other than she's voting for me This is the best I've been able to find.

BR, do you have anything to say about anyone else? Let's not leave it at "the Epig voters," be specific.

fingersplints wrote:

Enrique wrote:

Black Rock wrote:Alright slowly catching up and trying to stay current.

A few thoughts on players.

Daisy seems genuine to me, I am leaning civvie here.

Enrique reads baddie to me, once again that's where my vote will probably go.

MP, I'm feeling pretty neutral about him right now. I'm not seeing anything baddie here, just pushy.

I am going to look into Epigs voters posts as well. I feel like there was a last minute push in his direction and I personally did not see why he was so suspicious. Last day is the last I need to completely catch up on so I feel like I am working with full info here.

Linki: Gotrees, how does it make him more suspicious? I might be missing something here.

I want BR to say stuff other than she's voting for me This is the best I've been able to find.

BR, do you have anything to say about anyone else? Let's not leave it at "the Epig voters," be specific.

I'd like to hear BR's take on LC this game.

bea wrote:

Chris wrote:

bea wrote:Chris does win a few kiss up points though. Shakedown is my fav dead song. *starts youtube*

Just as planned...

But seriously, if you look back at my posts from just an hour or so ago, I quoted it.

I asked if a team member can target someone from the same team and purposely have it fail. The answer was no.

But tonight I asked an entirely different question...

It's ok, I know the answer is yes.

Ok. First of all. I don't understand how your second question is different from the first question you asked.

I know - I kinda asked for it by being a smartass on my night poll, but really.

I'm dealing with 111ty billion things. Please be clear in what you are asking. Because I didn't see the difference in the first thing asked and what you asked. And I want to be the best host I can be. So I am worried that you blanket assume my answer was yes when my answer was "I thought we addressed this question?"

Please explain it to me like I'm a drfunken 3 year old because well...it's my only day off in a 4 day string of crap and I want to be the best host I can be while I'm here.

Chris wrote:

bea wrote:

Chris wrote:

bea wrote:Chris does win a few kiss up points though. Shakedown is my fav dead song. *starts youtube*

Just as planned...

But seriously, if you look back at my posts from just an hour or so ago, I quoted it.

I asked if a team member can target someone from the same team and purposely have it fail. The answer was no.

But tonight I asked an entirely different question...

It's ok, I know the answer is yes.

Ok. First of all. I don't understand how your second question is different from the first question you asked.

I know - I kinda asked for it by being a smartass on my night poll, but really.

I'm dealing with 111ty billion things. Please be clear in what you are asking. Because I didn't see the difference in the first thing asked and what you asked. And I want to be the best host I can be. So I am worried that you blanket assume my answer was yes when my answer was "I thought we addressed this question?"

Please explain it to me like I'm a drfunken 3 year old because well...it's my only day off in a 4 day string of crap and I want to be the best host I can be while I'm here.

bea, in the first question, I asked it in a generic sense if a mafia team could target a teammate, and just fail the kill at will.

The answer was no, as in, if you target your teammate, they will die.


Now I'm asking, given that you'd die if your team targeted you, would The Cyber Controller die if his teammates targeted him for death? Given that his role states that he can't be night killed until everyone else in his team is dead, logic states that he'd live.

keys56000000000 wrote:Some of you seem really hung up on the Epig lynch. I don't know what to tell you guys, he seemed sketchy enough to get lynched to me. Why aren't you guys as hung up on Jules/Snow Dog's lynches? Other than the fact that you voted for those two?

Enrique wrote:

Black Rock wrote:Alright slowly catching up and trying to stay current.

A few thoughts on players.

Daisy seems genuine to me, I am leaning civvie here.

Enrique reads baddie to me, once again that's where my vote will probably go.

MP, I'm feeling pretty neutral about him right now. I'm not seeing anything baddie here, just pushy.

I am going to look into Epigs voters posts as well. I feel like there was a last minute push in his direction and I personally did not see why he was so suspicious. Last day is the last I need to completely catch up on so I feel like I am working with full info here.

Linki: Gotrees, how does it make him more suspicious? I might be missing something here.

I want BR to say stuff other than she's voting for me This is the best I've been able to find.

BR, do you have anything to say about anyone else? Let's not leave it at "the Epig voters," be specific.

fingersplints wrote:

Enrique wrote:

Black Rock wrote:Alright slowly catching up and trying to stay current.

A few thoughts on players.

Daisy seems genuine to me, I am leaning civvie here.

Enrique reads baddie to me, once again that's where my vote will probably go.

MP, I'm feeling pretty neutral about him right now. I'm not seeing anything baddie here, just pushy.

I am going to look into Epigs voters posts as well. I feel like there was a last minute push in his direction and I personally did not see why he was so suspicious. Last day is the last I need to completely catch up on so I feel like I am working with full info here.

Linki: Gotrees, how does it make him more suspicious? I might be missing something here.

I want BR to say stuff other than she's voting for me This is the best I've been able to find.

BR, do you have anything to say about anyone else? Let's not leave it at "the Epig voters," be specific.

I'd like to hear BR's take on LC this game.

Enrique wrote:That was unnecessarily aggressive Would you rather we let you play this game without offering any insight? I actually went through all your posts, out of which the only thing I could gather is that you think I'm bad and you vote for me every day (reminds me of someone..). And you said you think Daisy is good once. It's almost Day 4, let's get people talking and not be content with drive by voting.

Black Rock wrote:I have basically caught up right now. The one person who stood out to me the most was enrique. His posts read false to me. A few posts an amount of pages back kinda clinched it for me. My vote is likely going his way today.

Black Rock wrote:

Enrique wrote:My post explains why I think the way I do... we have a big list of civvies, a big list of Daleks, and a big list of Cybermen (and an indie role). There are 3 more players than there are roles, so we know there's some roles missing. It's just my interpretation, which I'm not trying to force on anyone, that the remaining roles are probably their own faction and not in any of the existing ones. Think about it. Why have "Dalek #1" and "Dalek #2" with secret powers instead of just naming one of then "Davros?"

Now what the hell are you smoking? I was away for a few minutes reading about the Time Lords, and tbh I really should be sleeping considering it's 5am and I have plans for noon. But Jesus Christ the reactions I get sometimes..

Ok so it's page 19, the back and forth between him and Zeek. It's not this post in particular but the whole exchange that felt off and false.

Black Rock wrote:Alright slowly catching up and trying to stay current.

A few thoughts on players.

Daisy seems genuine to me, I am leaning civvie here.

Enrique reads baddie to me, once again that's where my vote will probably go.

MP, I'm feeling pretty neutral about him right now. I'm not seeing anything baddie here, just pushy.

I am going to look into Epigs voters posts as well. I feel like there was a last minute push in his direction and I personally did not see why he was so suspicious. Last day is the last I need to completely catch up on so I feel like I am working with full info here.

Linki: Gotrees, how does it make him more suspicious? I might be missing something here.

Chris wrote: You've never heard of a mafia team targeting one of their own, in order to throw off suspicion?

Being targeted slightly clears a players. But not all that much IMO if you survive. I mean, that's like me buying a lottery ticket, not winning, but saying I almost won.

MP wasn't killed.


*HOSTS*

Can a mafia team target a member of their own team with a kill, and have it fail on purpose?

Enrique wrote:

Black Rock wrote:I have basically caught up right now. The one person who stood out to me the most was enrique. His posts read false to me. A few posts an amount of pages back kinda clinched it for me. My vote is likely going his way today.

Black Rock wrote:

Enrique wrote:My post explains why I think the way I do... we have a big list of civvies, a big list of Daleks, and a big list of Cybermen (and an indie role). There are 3 more players than there are roles, so we know there's some roles missing. It's just my interpretation, which I'm not trying to force on anyone, that the remaining roles are probably their own faction and not in any of the existing ones. Think about it. Why have "Dalek #1" and "Dalek #2" with secret powers instead of just naming one of then "Davros?"

Now what the hell are you smoking? I was away for a few minutes reading about the Time Lords, and tbh I really should be sleeping considering it's 5am and I have plans for noon. But Jesus Christ the reactions I get sometimes..

Ok so it's page 19, the back and forth between him and Zeek. It's not this post in particular but the whole exchange that felt off and false.

Black Rock wrote:Alright slowly catching up and trying to stay current.

A few thoughts on players.

Daisy seems genuine to me, I am leaning civvie here.

Enrique reads baddie to me, once again that's where my vote will probably go.

MP, I'm feeling pretty neutral about him right now. I'm not seeing anything baddie here, just pushy.

I am going to look into Epigs voters posts as well. I feel like there was a last minute push in his direction and I personally did not see why he was so suspicious. Last day is the last I need to completely catch up on so I feel like I am working with full info here.

Linki: Gotrees, how does it make him more suspicious? I might be missing something here.

This is about all the content I could find from you. You understand why I would want you to say more, right? Every other post is about you catching up or simply stopping by to mention you're gonna vote for me. Best reason you've given is that you thought my exchange with zeek seemed fake to you, whatever that means.

linki- Well, he was one of six votes. I was another one of the six, and actually the first one to voice suspicion for Epig, which LC never really did before his vote. I'm not accusing LC of anything, I was just curious to hear your thoughts.

linki2- Aggressive in a Mafia way, dw everything's good, but I was kinda surprised I just reiterated a question splints asked and your post immediately went to "Of course you'd want me to talk about other people, you baddie!"

Turnip Head wrote:

zeek wrote:Gets head for posting too much, <snip>.

Scandalous

I laughed hard enough at this that it's now part of my sig.

Enrique wrote:@Hosts: Are Dalek/Cyberman #1's roles "Block a player nightly?"

Surprised we haven't got that one yet.

Enrique wrote:I'm not saying you did... I was clearing that up myself... it's OK.

Nothing on anyone else then?

Chris wrote:BR, Rico's subtle/not-so-subtle defending of MP has me feeling like he could be a teammate.

How do you feel about MP? And if you think he could be bad, do you think he and Rico could be teammates?

Enrique wrote:I think we're probably civ teammates.

But let's also not forget how close he came to getting me lynched on Day 1 I'm not hiding anything, my opinions are exactly the ones you see in this thread. I think MP is good so I feel OK with defending him.

Enrique wrote:I think we're probably civ teammates.

But let's also not forget how close he came to getting me lynched on Day 1 I'm not hiding anything, my opinions are exactly the ones you see in this thread. I think MP is good so I feel OK with defending him.

Enrique wrote:This is honestly based on so little that I don't know what to say. You're wrong?

linki- right Dom but the thing is I was NOTHING away from being lynched. I still have Epig and BR's guaranteed votes every day, and you never know who from the sabie/blooper/Eloh/Bass hardly active train is gonna hop on at any given day.

Enrique wrote:Sick burn But damn at least I'm trying.

MovingPictures07 wrote:

Enrique wrote:Alex, not to speak for her, but let's just go with "she's leaning civvie." I think she's a civ too but I can't know if I'm right. It's too early to have any solid info on anyone. What she just said is super standard and I don't know why you'd be so quick to jump on her.

linki- Oh hi BR nice to see you!

I don't understand, how is "I do think he's a civvie" and "I have no idea if he's bad or not" the same?

And you know, I would have preferred she answered this and not you. Deja vu much?

Bass_the_Clever wrote:

Enrique wrote:Sick burn But damn at least I'm trying.

I mean thats what I'm doing. I said who I thought was bad . I gave my reasons sorry but this is how I play. Once I get a feel of how everyone is playing I will get more active.

Dom wrote:

Bass_the_Clever wrote:

Enrique wrote:Sick burn But damn at least I'm trying.

I mean thats what I'm doing. I said who I thought was bad . I gave my reasons sorry but this is how I play. Once I get a feel of how everyone is playing I will get more active.

Penny for your thoughts?

Bass_the_Clever wrote:

Dom wrote:

Bass_the_Clever wrote:

Enrique wrote:Sick burn But damn at least I'm trying.

I mean thats what I'm doing. I said who I thought was bad . I gave my reasons sorry but this is how I play. Once I get a feel of how everyone is playing I will get more active.

Penny for your thoughts?

Thoughts on what?

Chris wrote:And I'll add, to the rest of the players following along, this proposed gambit of MP's all went down BEFORE Hedgie and co. deciphered that secret... when he would have thought that this little fact was safe...

Enrique wrote:

MovingPictures07 wrote:

Enrique wrote:Alex, not to speak for her, but let's just go with "she's leaning civvie." I think she's a civ too but I can't know if I'm right. It's too early to have any solid info on anyone. What she just said is super standard and I don't know why you'd be so quick to jump on her.

linki- Oh hi BR nice to see you!

I don't understand, how is "I do think he's a civvie" and "I have no idea if he's bad or not" the same?

And you know, I would have preferred she answered this and not you. Deja vu much?

Epig how do you feel about this instance of "I would have preferred she answered?" Is it still a blatant baddie tactic in your books?