The Syndicate

TH, Is Hanna on your team?

Nobody's on my team. Was BWT on yours?

No. And I still don't believe you TH. I thought juliets might have been on your team, but you said you thought she was green.

That... is something I would not expect WW to say.

What makes you think BR as WW, TH?

Nothing in particular. I just have a hard time penciling her in anywhere and I don't necessarily trust her. Although Water Works did kill Bass, and BR had voted for Bass, so that wouldn't make much sense.

Metalmarsh89 wrote:Dunno yet, but I'm going to look at Hanna now.

Well I was going to do this. Instead MP and I discussed a new mafia game for 5 hours. Totally worth it though. But now I'm exhausted.

MovingPictures07 wrote:Your analysis is astute, MM. I also doubt LC is WW, just based on his behavior.

HannaK, LoRab, and splints would all be good places to look. LoRab has been least active though, so I do wonder if she would have missed more PMs, but I'm not sure.

HannaK has been incredibly blendy, so I think if I had to guess right now, I might guess her. Not sure about splints at all though.

MovingPictures07 wrote:She has just been EXTREMELY blendy and I can't rule her out from being WW.

Well just because you cant rule me out doesnt mean I am WW right?

Metalmarsh89 wrote:Dunno yet, but I'm going to look at Hanna now.

I dunno how I am supposed to defend myself when there isnt any evidence except for the fact that I am 'blendy'. I mean, that is my playstyle, especially when I am quite busy as I am right now with the final week of term and stuff. I am not generally the player who re-reads entire pages of threads and comes up with elaborate theories and analyses. Like I said, I keep up with the game (I know you don't know me but I would also not be inclined to miss a kill if I were WW) but I am quite busy and so far every day when I caught up on the thread some good points were raised and I agreed with some and not with others...not sure how that makes me WW.

I guess today's lynch is gonna be harder than the previous two days because we dont have an obvious candidate, but I suggest you look somewhere else if you wanna lynch WW

Hanna, why did you suggest that MP or Bass might be a baddie?

Metalmarsh89 wrote:Hanna, why did you suggest that MP or Bass might be a baddie?

I just pointed to the fact that everyone said they were 'neutral' now but they got the roles of two inactive players which means that there is always a chance one of them got a baddie card (or at least that's how I read boo's explanation about how bass and MP got back into the game), i never said they were bad per se, just that they can be and we should keep that in mind and not cross them of our list because they are replacements, but maybe I am missing something?

HannaK wrote:

Metalmarsh89 wrote:Hanna, why did you suggest that MP or Bass might be a baddie?

I just pointed to the fact that everyone said they were 'neutral' now but they got the roles of two inactive players which means that there is always a chance one of them got a baddie card (or at least that's how I read boo's explanation about how bass and MP got back into the game), i never said they were bad per se, just that they can be and we should keep that in mind and not cross them of our list because they are replacements, but maybe I am missing something?

I would say that even if they had gotten a baddie card, they would still be neutral, with the win conditions that the host laid out when he subbed them in. I believe you were indeed missing something, Hannah, look back on boo's posts and see where they came back. I don't believe they can be baddies.

Long Con wrote:

HannaK wrote:

Metalmarsh89 wrote:Hanna, why did you suggest that MP or Bass might be a baddie?

I just pointed to the fact that everyone said they were 'neutral' now but they got the roles of two inactive players which means that there is always a chance one of them got a baddie card (or at least that's how I read boo's explanation about how bass and MP got back into the game), i never said they were bad per se, just that they can be and we should keep that in mind and not cross them of our list because they are replacements, but maybe I am missing something?

I would say that even if they had gotten a baddie card, they would still be neutral, with the win conditions that the host laid out when he subbed them in. I believe you were indeed missing something, Hannah, look back on boo's posts and see where they came back. I don't believe they can be baddies.

Hmm okay yeah I assumed they took over thet roles of the two players but it's not in boo's post so I guess they dont have any property attatched to them then?

I really think it's MM you guys. He's the one who says with such certainty that I'm a pink, that DF was a railroad... I really don't see anyone else acting as much like Water Works as he has, given which players' roles we know WW has learned.

He's also got a buttload of votes on hand, so if we were to try to vote him out it would probably have to be unanimous.

Turnip Head wrote:I really think it's MM you guys. He's the one who says with such certainty that I'm a pink, that DF was a railroad... I really don't see anyone else acting as much like Water Works as he has, given which players' roles we know WW has learned.

I concur. Plus juliets started mentioning suspicion on MM and then was killed.

He could very well be Water Works... and even if he isn't, he has Kentucky Avenue. If he is, then he may even have two red hotels on hand. Those things are a bigger killer than baddie teams and ebola combined.

Turnip Head wrote:I really think it's MM you guys. He's the one who says with such certainty that I'm a pink, that DF was a railroad... I really don't see anyone else acting as much like Water Works as he has, given which players' roles we know WW has learned.

Have you and had DF landed on WW in the past?

sorry for the double post - also - who else has landed on ww?

bea wrote:

Turnip Head wrote:I really think it's MM you guys. He's the one who says with such certainty that I'm a pink, that DF was a railroad... I really don't see anyone else acting as much like Water Works as he has, given which players' roles we know WW has learned.

Have you and had DF landed on WW in the past?

Yes bea, me on night 0 and DF on Night 7. I don't know offhand who else has landed there but it's quite a few.

That is a compelling case for MM being WW... I'll definitely consider putting my vote there.

You say he has vote manipulation; he has the +5, right? And probably the +2 as well.

Turnip Head wrote:I really think it's MM you guys. He's the one who says with such certainty that I'm a pink, that DF was a railroad... I really don't see anyone else acting as much like Water Works as he has, given which players' roles we know WW has learned.

So why don't you vote for me?

MovingPictures07 wrote:That is a compelling case for MM being WW... I'll definitely consider putting my vote there.

You say he has vote manipulation; he has the +5, right? And probably the +2 as well.

I do have a +5, but nobody got a +2.

boo wrote:Market Place:



Money is Power (When played, it changes the value of all votes in the present or next lynch. Players with more money have votes worth more, and players with less money have votes worth less). - Starts at $100

What are you gonna do about it?

$101 on Money is Power

30 minutes, does that make it mine?

We have 30 minutes to beat your latest bid.

That's fine. I wouldn't mind if you were forced to spend all your money.

This isn't good.

$500 on Grab Bag

Let's see who else has extra cash.

Turnip Head wrote:This isn't good.

Oh hush, I'm doing you a favor since you're poor.

You aren't doing this for me

Are you sure you want to vote for me though?

Don't I still have to? One way or another, we need to exhaust your resources. Even if it means you end up running a lynch or two. This is what I was warning about earlier.

Agreed, but first let's look at something else. As you may have already guessed, I do know some things. I know many things. (This is Harry Potter all over again). My question to you is how would you like me to utilize my knowledge and power?

Do you mean "Utilitize"?

Metalmarsh89 wrote:Agreed, but first let's look at something else. As you may have already guessed, I do know some things. I know many things. (This is Harry Potter all over again). My question to you is how would you like me to utilize my knowledge and power?

To not kill me?

Long Con wrote:Do you mean "Utilitize"?

You're too much LC.

Turnip Head wrote:

Metalmarsh89 wrote:Agreed, but first let's look at something else. As you may have already guessed, I do know some things. I know many things. (This is Harry Potter all over again). My question to you is how would you like me to utilize my knowledge and power?

To not kill me?

That's a possibility. But you are not alone.

Well I'm sure your knowledge and power has told you that Long Con has just as many extra votes as you do, and this would probably be a good chance for you to help us deal with that.

Voting mm so I don't miss getting i later and miss another vote. Pretty clear at this point he (he?) is bad.

Turnip Head wrote:Well I'm sure your knowledge and power has told you that Long Con has just as many extra votes as you do, and this would probably be a good chance for you to help us deal with that.

Indeed, I am wary of this, as well as his financial status.

LoRab wrote:(he?)

Last I checked, you were right.

Another 3 am deadline...,anyway voting mm

Hi, reconsider please.

Who should I consider voting instead?

LC. Perhaps force us each to lay all our cards on the table and see what happens.

That is my suggestion.