Re: Arkham Mafia [Day 2]
Posted: Sun Feb 21, 2016 2:28 pm
@DH omfg that made my day. 
MATT please answer my question, how is he target painting you?

MATT please answer my question, how is he target painting you?
I'm not directing you to the exact post for a reason. I don't want to draw too much attention to it. You speculated that someone else might be the role I thought you hinted. That would indicate you aren't that role.Scotty wrote:WHAT ROLEHINT ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT? I keep asking what you're getting at, and you're just talking around me like I'm not here.Dom wrote:I obviously don't want non-game related info.
If you didn't buy my case or Mac's case and also don't buy the theory, that would be logically consistent.
However, I really don't think Scotty is good. Especially since he denied the rolehint that I thought would make him in wayne manor.
Is this a threat?Scotty wrote:Dom wrote:Things like this make me think the theory we have about Scotty might not be right.![]()
You just really want to lynch me. It's quite astounding. It's like you're me last Thursday and I'm that box of Thin Mints I forgot about the bottom of my suitcase and had to eat until they were devoured and gone.
I'm not a thin mint, Dom. Watch your calorie intake.
Also, a threat? Uh...no? I honestly feel like you're getting argumentative for no reason. Which is why, tonally, I don't trust you. It's not just that you voted me or continue to hound me, but your defensiveness is off the charts.
Linki:
Did she ever give her thoughts on me? :/Turnip Head wrote:I bet the baddies are enjoying their extended vaycay with the Matt/Enrique show taking up 83% of the discussion today.
Black Rock is still a baddie read for me. Here's her ISO if you want to look at her efforts this game. She has 3 posts in this Day cycle and while her posts came in at the height of the Matt discussion she doesn't give us her take on that. I believe civ BR would have something to say on the subject one way or the other. IMO that fits the profile that the baddies are sitting back and letting this discussion take over. I think her attempts to get herself involved in the game ring false. When bea does her nightly catch-up and makes a bunch of posts in a row, giving us her take of the current events, it feels genuine to me. When BR binge reads a 40 page thread, takes the time to comment on insignificant or soon-to-be insignificant things in the first 8 pages, and then never goes back to the exercise, it feels like a hollow way to contribute.
Why do you still keep saying this blatantly untrue thing when people have pointed this out to you over and over?Matt wrote:I would still be suspicious of Enrique regardless (more detail once I no longer feel like posting in form of knock knock), but based on Enrique 100% believing I targeted the Joker, with 0% interest in lynching who I said my top suspect was, that is curious as fuck and I think they're teamies.
Nope, she abandoned that exercise just like she abandoned the catch-up-and-quote-everything-I-can exercise.DharmaHelper wrote:Did she ever give her thoughts on me? :/Turnip Head wrote:I bet the baddies are enjoying their extended vaycay with the Matt/Enrique show taking up 83% of the discussion today.
Black Rock is still a baddie read for me. Here's her ISO if you want to look at her efforts this game. She has 3 posts in this Day cycle and while her posts came in at the height of the Matt discussion she doesn't give us her take on that. I believe civ BR would have something to say on the subject one way or the other. IMO that fits the profile that the baddies are sitting back and letting this discussion take over. I think her attempts to get herself involved in the game ring false. When bea does her nightly catch-up and makes a bunch of posts in a row, giving us her take of the current events, it feels genuine to me. When BR binge reads a 40 page thread, takes the time to comment on insignificant or soon-to-be insignificant things in the first 8 pages, and then never goes back to the exercise, it feels like a hollow way to contribute.
I'm a little more concerned that he put his vote on Bullzeye for virtually no reason.Dom wrote:Does no one have any thoughts on Mac's 7 posts in a row (along with several other streaks of more than 3 or 4) and him telling BR to stop padding her post count?
Haven't gotten to that part yet.Dom wrote:Does no one have any thoughts on Mac's 7 posts in a row (along with several other streaks of more than 3 or 4) and him telling BR to stop padding her post count?
You got it all wrong. He's a fierce warrior that doesn't have patience for unreasonable people like, literally anybody that can't read the thread he's made up in his mind.DharmaHelper wrote:Yo for real fuck you Matt how many times are you going to not talk about the things people want you to talk about lmao
Same with Zebra's post from Thursday/Friday.DharmaHelper wrote:How difficult is it to say "Knock Knock, who's there, Methinks. Methinks who? Methinks in regards to MP and Mac painting Scotty as Robin that X is suspicious and Y is not suspicious and Z is true and A is false."
DharmaHelper wrote:..post will end anticlimactically.
My thought is you've got a good point. I don't see any incentive for the baddies to pursue someone from Wayne Manor. And no, i don't think it has been pointed out. What conclusions, if any, does this lead you to DH?DharmaHelper wrote:Ay can I get peoples thoughts on this:
Why would the mafia kill Wilgy if they thought he was Robin? Their win conditions require only that the GCPD and the other mafia be eliminated. Nothing regarding Wayne Manor. Sorry if this has been pointed out.
Maybe is like a hungering. You can't mention the Joker, you can't mention you are cursed by the Joker, You can't mention the name of the Joker or the Joker will kill you!?Golden wrote:No, I think the point about why 2 is unlikely is pretty sound. It's the same thing I was trying to say in Star Wars when Mac thought I might be on Team Hutt... Epi is not going to create mechanics that out people outright in the thread.
On the other hand, I'm trying to figure out how the joker thing will work without at least informing the person who targetted him.
I was curious about what would happen in your game if I had mentioned I had been hungered. Would I have been mod killed?Black Rock wrote:Maybe is like a hungering. You can't mention the Joker, you can't mention you are cursed by the Joker, You can't mention the name of the Joker or the Joker will kill you!?Golden wrote:No, I think the point about why 2 is unlikely is pretty sound. It's the same thing I was trying to say in Star Wars when Mac thought I might be on Team Hutt... Epi is not going to create mechanics that out people outright in the thread.
On the other hand, I'm trying to figure out how the joker thing will work without at least informing the person who targetted him.
That would be a cool thing I could see these hosts thinking up. I love the Hunger.
Reducing my suspicion to basic/inaccurate values. Cool. :PGood Question, lol. I am waiting for the interrogations of everyone else who has asked carefully worded questions and missed a vote.
Interesting points, bea, though thebea wrote:I have to spend mafia time driving around the city for product.
Interesting point about BR TH.
Also interesting point about Mac dom.
Lots to think about and little time for posting.![]()
I always worry that my
I thought of this, but didn't want to activate the other part of teh Hunger, which if I remember correctly, was that no one can guess you're under those conditions. Right? Or am I mixing things up?Black Rock wrote:Maybe is like a hungering. You can't mention the Joker, you can't mention you are cursed by the Joker, You can't mention the name of the Joker or the Joker will kill you!?Golden wrote:No, I think the point about why 2 is unlikely is pretty sound. It's the same thing I was trying to say in Star Wars when Mac thought I might be on Team Hutt... Epi is not going to create mechanics that out people outright in the thread.
On the other hand, I'm trying to figure out how the joker thing will work without at least informing the person who targetted him.
That would be a cool thing I could see these hosts thinking up. I love the Hunger.
This made me laugh so hard.MacDougall wrote:"Hmm what role should Joker be LC" young Epi asked.
"Well he should have power! He's a great character and should be really cool and tough!" young LC said.
"Yeah you are right! So we should make it so if he gets targeted something BAD happens to that person... but also JOKEY!" Epignosis enthusiastically intoned.
"Yeah for sure!" young LC agreed. "Like they get POST CURSED!"
"That is a great idea. That way if someone targets him, then they will immediately know that who they targeted is the Joker and whenever they start posting in curses in the thread, everybody else will also know that they targeted The Joker... making it easy for them to lynch The Joker!"
Epignosis was thrilled with his new creation. All the hosts beamed when he told them of his majestic role creation. Not one single host realising the folly therein. That such a role would be cursed by it's own creation and possibly the stupidest role to have ever lived.
Essentially the Hunger would have killed you but yes.Scotty wrote:I was curious about what would happen in your game if I had mentioned I had been hungered. Would I have been mod killed?Black Rock wrote:Maybe is like a hungering. You can't mention the Joker, you can't mention you are cursed by the Joker, You can't mention the name of the Joker or the Joker will kill you!?Golden wrote:No, I think the point about why 2 is unlikely is pretty sound. It's the same thing I was trying to say in Star Wars when Mac thought I might be on Team Hutt... Epi is not going to create mechanics that out people outright in the thread.
On the other hand, I'm trying to figure out how the joker thing will work without at least informing the person who targetted him.
That would be a cool thing I could see these hosts thinking up. I love the Hunger.
This is a good point. The Mafia don't have a whole lot of incentive to kill Wayne Manor.DharmaHelper wrote:Ay can I get peoples thoughts on this:
Why would the mafia kill Wilgy if they thought he was Robin? Their win conditions require only that the GCPD and the other mafia be eliminated. Nothing regarding Wayne Manor. Sorry if this has been pointed out.
lol, the way I do it this wouldn't count.Dom wrote:I thought of this, but didn't want to activate the other part of teh Hunger, which if I remember correctly, was that no one can guess you're under those conditions. Right? Or am I mixing things up?Black Rock wrote:Maybe is like a hungering. You can't mention the Joker, you can't mention you are cursed by the Joker, You can't mention the name of the Joker or the Joker will kill you!?Golden wrote:No, I think the point about why 2 is unlikely is pretty sound. It's the same thing I was trying to say in Star Wars when Mac thought I might be on Team Hutt... Epi is not going to create mechanics that out people outright in the thread.
On the other hand, I'm trying to figure out how the joker thing will work without at least informing the person who targetted him.
That would be a cool thing I could see these hosts thinking up. I love the Hunger.
Dom, what do you think of zebra? My read is she is good but I just thought of a scenario that would fit the pieces we have that would mean she is bad. I really don't want to believe that though.Dom wrote:Same with Zebra's post from Thursday/Friday.DharmaHelper wrote:How difficult is it to say "Knock Knock, who's there, Methinks. Methinks who? Methinks in regards to MP and Mac painting Scotty as Robin that X is suspicious and Y is not suspicious and Z is true and A is false."
I'm leaning not Mafia. Maybe a member of Arkham, but not Mafia, unless corrupted.juliets wrote:Dom, what do you think of zebra? My read is she is good but I just thought of a scenario that would fit the pieces we have that would mean she is bad. I really don't want to believe that though.Dom wrote:Same with Zebra's post from Thursday/Friday.DharmaHelper wrote:How difficult is it to say "Knock Knock, who's there, Methinks. Methinks who? Methinks in regards to MP and Mac painting Scotty as Robin that X is suspicious and Y is not suspicious and Z is true and A is false."
gonna get this tattooed on my ass.Enrique wrote:matt noooo
I got distracted. Maybe after the lynch but you haven't interested me much the past few days to worry about it. I still haven't read most of the thread and this particular time I am just trying to keep up with current events.DharmaHelper wrote:My suspects thusfar, in no particular order:
SVS - I'm waiting for the shoe to drop on this one where I get accused of always doing this, or whatever, but I can't help legitimately finding the fact that she missed a vote after saying 10 minutes beforehand that she had to vote. Her explanations conflict with each other and don't make sense either. She got wrapped up in the Matt/Zebra conflict? OK ya sure. Except her "Better vote" post was her LAST POST before the 10 minute gap, her post following that was the one wherein she addressed her thoughts on Matt/Zebra. She had 10 minutes. Nobody'll follow me on this suspicion because I "always do this" or somethine lame but there you go. I probably won't vote for SVS today. I also intentionally put her at the top of this list after saying that it was in no particular order but that was only because I thought it was funny.
MP and Mac - For painting Scotty as confirmed civ and running with the Wilgy=Robin theory
Black Rock - TH's case covers this pretty well and it kind of bugs me she never followed through with a readthrough of me in particular because it's not like I'm buffing my post count or posting unnecessarily robust posts.
I better find this case.Nerolunar wrote:@Turnip Head interesting point about Black Rock.
The same case could possibly be made for Sabie. Im going to check her ISO right now.
Did I use the words "post count"?Black Rock wrote:I got distracted. Maybe after the lynch but you haven't interested me much the past few days to worry about it. I still haven't read most of the thread and this particular time I am just trying to keep up with current events.DharmaHelper wrote:My suspects thusfar, in no particular order:
SVS - I'm waiting for the shoe to drop on this one where I get accused of always doing this, or whatever, but I can't help legitimately finding the fact that she missed a vote after saying 10 minutes beforehand that she had to vote. Her explanations conflict with each other and don't make sense either. She got wrapped up in the Matt/Zebra conflict? OK ya sure. Except her "Better vote" post was her LAST POST before the 10 minute gap, her post following that was the one wherein she addressed her thoughts on Matt/Zebra. She had 10 minutes. Nobody'll follow me on this suspicion because I "always do this" or somethine lame but there you go. I probably won't vote for SVS today. I also intentionally put her at the top of this list after saying that it was in no particular order but that was only because I thought it was funny.
MP and Mac - For painting Scotty as confirmed civ and running with the Wilgy=Robin theory
Black Rock - TH's case covers this pretty well and it kind of bugs me she never followed through with a readthrough of me in particular because it's not like I'm buffing my post count or posting unnecessarily robust posts.
I see why Bea said she was highly criticized in the past by trying to get involved. Why is everyone worried about post count?
ok. i didn't know. i have never been targeted by or been the hunger.Black Rock wrote:lol, the way I do it this wouldn't count.Dom wrote:I thought of this, but didn't want to activate the other part of teh Hunger, which if I remember correctly, was that no one can guess you're under those conditions. Right? Or am I mixing things up?Black Rock wrote:Maybe is like a hungering. You can't mention the Joker, you can't mention you are cursed by the Joker, You can't mention the name of the Joker or the Joker will kill you!?Golden wrote:No, I think the point about why 2 is unlikely is pretty sound. It's the same thing I was trying to say in Star Wars when Mac thought I might be on Team Hutt... Epi is not going to create mechanics that out people outright in the thread.
On the other hand, I'm trying to figure out how the joker thing will work without at least informing the person who targetted him.
That would be a cool thing I could see these hosts thinking up. I love the Hunger.
Knock knock.bea wrote:I have to spend mafia time driving around the city for product.
Interesting point about BR TH.
Also interesting point about Mac dom.
Lots to think about and little time for posting.![]()
I always worry that my
How and whyMatt wrote:Knock knock.bea wrote:I have to spend mafia time driving around the city for product.
Interesting point about BR TH.
Also interesting point about Mac dom.
Lots to think about and little time for posting.![]()
I always worry that my
Who's there?
Does anybody
Does anybody who?
Does anybody else think "I always worry that my" was supposed to go into a btsc chat instead of here?
I'll tell you in seven days.Matt wrote:Knock knock.bea wrote:I have to spend mafia time driving around the city for product.
Interesting point about BR TH.
Also interesting point about Mac dom.
Lots to think about and little time for posting.![]()
I always worry that my
Who's there?
Does anybody
Does anybody who?
Does anybody else think "I always worry that my" was supposed to go into a btsc chat instead of here?
Wait I'm confused did Bea say this during the game or at another time?Black Rock wrote:I got distracted. Maybe after the lynch but you haven't interested me much the past few days to worry about it. I still haven't read most of the thread and this particular time I am just trying to keep up with current events.DharmaHelper wrote:My suspects thusfar, in no particular order:
SVS - I'm waiting for the shoe to drop on this one where I get accused of always doing this, or whatever, but I can't help legitimately finding the fact that she missed a vote after saying 10 minutes beforehand that she had to vote. Her explanations conflict with each other and don't make sense either. She got wrapped up in the Matt/Zebra conflict? OK ya sure. Except her "Better vote" post was her LAST POST before the 10 minute gap, her post following that was the one wherein she addressed her thoughts on Matt/Zebra. She had 10 minutes. Nobody'll follow me on this suspicion because I "always do this" or somethine lame but there you go. I probably won't vote for SVS today. I also intentionally put her at the top of this list after saying that it was in no particular order but that was only because I thought it was funny.
MP and Mac - For painting Scotty as confirmed civ and running with the Wilgy=Robin theory
Black Rock - TH's case covers this pretty well and it kind of bugs me she never followed through with a readthrough of me in particular because it's not like I'm buffing my post count or posting unnecessarily robust posts.
I see why Bea said she was highly criticized in the past by trying to get involved. Why is everyone worried about post count?
That doesn't make sense.Matt wrote:Knock knock.bea wrote:I have to spend mafia time driving around the city for product.
Interesting point about BR TH.
Also interesting point about Mac dom.
Lots to think about and little time for posting.![]()
I always worry that my
Who's there?
Does anybody
Does anybody who?
Does anybody else think "I always worry that my" was supposed to go into a btsc chat instead of here?
Fair enough. You are wrong but it's hard to argue against that. It's not a hollow way, I am just really catching up on current events and haven't even finished digesting them. I still haven't figured out where I stand with the Matt thing entirely but I don't think he's bad. When I went over the roles I noticed just as few baddies target as civvies. If anything he's likely independent.Turnip Head wrote:I bet the baddies are enjoying their extended vaycay with the Matt/Enrique show taking up 83% of the discussion today.
Black Rock is still a baddie read for me. Here's her ISO if you want to look at her efforts this game. She has 3 posts in this Day cycle and while her posts came in at the height of the Matt discussion she doesn't give us her take on that. I believe civ BR would have something to say on the subject one way or the other. IMO that fits the profile that the baddies are sitting back and letting this discussion take over. I think her attempts to get herself involved in the game ring false. When bea does her nightly catch-up and makes a bunch of posts in a row, giving us her take of the current events, it feels genuine to me. When BR binge reads a 40 page thread, takes the time to comment on insignificant or soon-to-be insignificant things in the first 8 pages, and then never goes back to the exercise, it feels like a hollow way to contribute.