Page 53 of 91

Re: MAD MAX: Day 5

Posted: Fri Oct 28, 2016 2:32 pm
by JaggedJimmyJay
I'm going to be on the road for about 13 hours starting this evening, so I'll likely go dark here. I like my vote where it is.

Re: MAD MAX: Day 5

Posted: Fri Oct 28, 2016 2:39 pm
by JaggedJimmyJay
It actually occurs to me that I'll be busy on-site too (going to Boston for the weekend), so I might have zero time for this game the rest of Day 5.

Re: MAD MAX: Day 5

Posted: Fri Oct 28, 2016 2:46 pm
by Sloonei
Scotty wrote:
Sloonei wrote:
Scotty wrote:@JJJ: indi just drops a vote unannounced and doesn't offer anything else on the table.

Is that a civ or mafia look for her?
I think it is a bad look. It hints at her being withdrawn and uninspired again.
Would you vote for her? This is the most trepidation I've seen from you regarding indi, but haven't yet seen you pull the trigger.
I would now. Initially I thought you two looked similar because neither of you seemed to be putting in a lot of effort after subbing in. I thought you looked the worst of the two, but you're completely fipping that theory on its head now.

Re: MAD MAX: Day 5

Posted: Fri Oct 28, 2016 2:47 pm
by Sloonei
JaggedJimmyJay wrote:It actually occurs to me that I'll be busy on-site too (going to Boston for the weekend), so I might have zero time for this game the rest of Day 5.
Wicked bad news, not pissah.

Re: MAD MAX: Day 5

Posted: Fri Oct 28, 2016 2:50 pm
by Scotty
Sloonei wrote:
Scotty wrote:
Sloonei wrote:
Scotty wrote:@JJJ: indi just drops a vote unannounced and doesn't offer anything else on the table.

Is that a civ or mafia look for her?
I think it is a bad look. It hints at her being withdrawn and uninspired again.
Would you vote for her? This is the most trepidation I've seen from you regarding indi, but haven't yet seen you pull the trigger.
I would now. Initially I thought you two looked similar because neither of you seemed to be putting in a lot of effort after subbing in. I thought you looked the worst of the two, but you're completely fipping that theory on its head now.
Oh, am I?

Anything in particular? Maybe my if/then indictment of you? Or my dashing good looks?

Image

Re: MAD MAX: Day 5

Posted: Fri Oct 28, 2016 2:57 pm
by Sloonei
Scotty wrote:
Sloonei wrote:
Scotty wrote:
Sloonei wrote:
Scotty wrote:@JJJ: indi just drops a vote unannounced and doesn't offer anything else on the table.

Is that a civ or mafia look for her?
I think it is a bad look. It hints at her being withdrawn and uninspired again.
Would you vote for her? This is the most trepidation I've seen from you regarding indi, but haven't yet seen you pull the trigger.
I would now. Initially I thought you two looked similar because neither of you seemed to be putting in a lot of effort after subbing in. I thought you looked the worst of the two, but you're completely fipping that theory on its head now.
Oh, am I?

Anything in particular? Maybe my if/then indictment of you? Or my dashing good looks?

Image
Your activity alone is enough. Meanwhile, indiglo has just dropped a vote and ran. That is a complete lack of effort, I am uninspired.
What concerns me most is that she voted for Wilgy. I think her vote looks awful, but I also still think Wilgy looked bad last night. Would indiglo come in and drop an early but risky bus vote on one of her teammates?

Re: MAD MAX: Day 5

Posted: Fri Oct 28, 2016 3:05 pm
by Sloonei
Scotty, would you be able to produce some sort of rainbow list or GTH scum list right now if I asked you to?

Re: MAD MAX: Day 5

Posted: Fri Oct 28, 2016 3:54 pm
by JaggedJimmyJay
If indiglo is bad I think Wilgy probably is too. I would lynch her first though because she is the key to that dynamic. Her vote doesn't look random to me.

If that's true, the other baddie is kind of up in the air. I could see a lot of people occupying that slot. Mac's theory about why MP was killed may be valid too, which would go to Glorfindel.

Re: MAD MAX: Day 5

Posted: Fri Oct 28, 2016 4:02 pm
by Sloonei
What makes you feel that way about her vote?

Re: MAD MAX: Day 5

Posted: Fri Oct 28, 2016 4:06 pm
by JaggedJimmyJay
Sloonei wrote:What makes you feel that way about her vote?
That it exists. Neither indiglo nor Wilgy has done much in recent memory in this thread, so the vote just looks like it has some strategic motivation. It could also be a generic self-preservation vote. Glorfindel was also a viable target for that though, and she specifically chose Wilgy.

Re: MAD MAX: Day 5

Posted: Fri Oct 28, 2016 5:58 pm
by Scotty
Sloonei wrote:Scotty, would you be able to produce some sort of rainbow list or GTH scum list right now if I asked you to?
Sure, I guess. Still people I haven't looked at closely, so I'm not confident of those holding too much weight.

Re: MAD MAX: Day 5

Posted: Fri Oct 28, 2016 6:03 pm
by Scotty
Dom: GOOD
DrWilgy: BAD
Epignosis 2.0: GOOD
Glorfindel: BAD
Indiglo: BAD
insertnamehere: GOOD
JaggedJimmyJay: GOOD
LoRab: GOOD
MacDougall: GOOD
motel room: GOOD
Quin: BAD
Sloonei: BAD


I feel like Glorf could go either way for me, and I'm still operating under the assumption that INH saved himself.
Quin is literally a gut read based on dribblings of post she he has made, and I have no evidence to think him bad besides that.

Re: MAD MAX: Day 5

Posted: Fri Oct 28, 2016 6:25 pm
by Epignosis
I'm going to vote MacDougall for now. I've determined that it's his fault I can't read the thread at work. :suspish:

I'm having company over tonight. I'll make a more informed decision in the morning over tea.

Re: MAD MAX: Day 5

Posted: Fri Oct 28, 2016 6:33 pm
by MacDougall
Lol

Re: MAD MAX: Day 5

Posted: Fri Oct 28, 2016 6:35 pm
by Sloonei
Scotty wrote:Dom: GOOD
DrWilgy: BAD
Epignosis 2.0: GOOD
Glorfindel: BAD
Indiglo: BAD
insertnamehere: GOOD
JaggedJimmyJay: GOOD
LoRab: GOOD
MacDougall: GOOD
motel room: GOOD
Quin: BAD
Sloonei: BAD


I feel like Glorf could go either way for me, and I'm still operating under the assumption that INH saved himself.
Quin is literally a gut read based on dribblings of post she he has made, and I have no evidence to think him bad besides that.
indi and wilgy seem to be pretty universally suspected. I am confident that we can find at least one baddie between the two of them.

I'm surprised at your bad reads on myself and Quin, Scotty. Can you explain those?

Re: MAD MAX: Day 5

Posted: Fri Oct 28, 2016 7:12 pm
by Scotty
Sloonei wrote:
Scotty wrote:Dom: GOOD
DrWilgy: BAD
Epignosis 2.0: GOOD
Glorfindel: BAD
Indiglo: BAD
insertnamehere: GOOD
JaggedJimmyJay: GOOD
LoRab: GOOD
MacDougall: GOOD
motel room: GOOD
Quin: BAD
Sloonei: BAD


I feel like Glorf could go either way for me, and I'm still operating under the assumption that INH saved himself.
Quin is literally a gut read based on dribblings of post she he has made, and I have no evidence to think him bad besides that.
indi and wilgy seem to be pretty universally suspected. I am confident that we can find at least one baddie between the two of them.

I'm surprised at your bad reads on myself and Quin, Scotty. Can you explain those?
Umm. I did.

Quin is purely a gut read like I said in the post you quoted.
I think you are suspicious based on my feeling that indi is bad, as I said a few posts ago

Re: MAD MAX: Day 5

Posted: Fri Oct 28, 2016 7:14 pm
by Sloonei
I was wondering if there was more to it than that. You referenced posts of Quin's that give you a had vibe. Which posts?

Re: MAD MAX: Day 5

Posted: Fri Oct 28, 2016 8:45 pm
by DrWilgy
Sloonei wrote:
Scotty wrote:Dom: GOOD
DrWilgy: BAD
Epignosis 2.0: GOOD
Glorfindel: BAD
Indiglo: BAD
insertnamehere: GOOD
JaggedJimmyJay: GOOD
LoRab: GOOD
MacDougall: GOOD
motel room: GOOD
Quin: BAD
Sloonei: BAD


I feel like Glorf could go either way for me, and I'm still operating under the assumption that INH saved himself.
Quin is literally a gut read based on dribblings of post she he has made, and I have no evidence to think him bad besides that.
indi and wilgy seem to be pretty universally suspected. I am confident that we can find at least one baddie between the two of them.

I'm surprised at your bad reads on myself and Quin, Scotty. Can you explain those?
What is up with these all encompassing blame trains?

Just u wait Sloon... ONE DAY I'LL HAVE TIME TO POST

Re: MAD MAX: Day 5

Posted: Fri Oct 28, 2016 9:17 pm
by Sloonei
DrWilgy wrote:
Sloonei wrote:
Scotty wrote:Dom: GOOD
DrWilgy: BAD
Epignosis 2.0: GOOD
Glorfindel: BAD
Indiglo: BAD
insertnamehere: GOOD
JaggedJimmyJay: GOOD
LoRab: GOOD
MacDougall: GOOD
motel room: GOOD
Quin: BAD
Sloonei: BAD


I feel like Glorf could go either way for me, and I'm still operating under the assumption that INH saved himself.
Quin is literally a gut read based on dribblings of post she he has made, and I have no evidence to think him bad besides that.
indi and wilgy seem to be pretty universally suspected. I am confident that we can find at least one baddie between the two of them.

I'm surprised at your bad reads on myself and Quin, Scotty. Can you explain those?
What is up with these all encompassing blame trains?

Just u wait Sloon... ONE DAY I'LL HAVE TIME TO POST
I finally suspect you for something you did post.
Why was MP killed?

Re: MAD MAX: Day 5

Posted: Fri Oct 28, 2016 9:57 pm
by Quin
Scotty wrote:
Sloonei wrote:
Scotty wrote:Dom: GOOD
DrWilgy: BAD
Epignosis 2.0: GOOD
Glorfindel: BAD
Indiglo: BAD
insertnamehere: GOOD
JaggedJimmyJay: GOOD
LoRab: GOOD
MacDougall: GOOD
motel room: GOOD
Quin: BAD
Sloonei: BAD


I feel like Glorf could go either way for me, and I'm still operating under the assumption that INH saved himself.
Quin is literally a gut read based on dribblings of post she he has made, and I have no evidence to think him bad besides that.
indi and wilgy seem to be pretty universally suspected. I am confident that we can find at least one baddie between the two of them.

I'm surprised at your bad reads on myself and Quin, Scotty. Can you explain those?
Umm. I did.

Quin is purely a gut read like I said in the post you quoted.
I think you are suspicious based on my feeling that indi is bad, as I said a few posts ago
Are there any specific posts currently giving you the heeby-jeebies that I can address?

Re: MAD MAX: Day 5

Posted: Fri Oct 28, 2016 10:03 pm
by Sloonei
Who are you gonna vote for, Mr Quin?

Re: MAD MAX: Day 5

Posted: Fri Oct 28, 2016 10:05 pm
by Quin
Sloonei wrote:Who are you gonna vote for, Mr Quin?
indiglo. What's your take on the case against him?

Re: MAD MAX: Day 5

Posted: Fri Oct 28, 2016 10:05 pm
by Quin
Or her.

Re: MAD MAX: Day 5

Posted: Fri Oct 28, 2016 10:09 pm
by Sloonei
Quin wrote:
Sloonei wrote:Who are you gonna vote for, Mr Quin?
indiglo. What's your take on the case against him?
I've been on the fence about her most of the time. I see the case against her but I've had a hard time deciding whether or not her frustration comes from a townie or a scum point of view. Her vote today is the strongest evidence that it's a scum perspective that I've seen all game, and that has put me over the edge in terms of suspecting her. I am fully willing to vote for her today. I just wish either her or Wilgy were here to address some concerns, as they seem to be everyone's top suspects.

Even if we are right about those two, there still remains a third bad guy who we'll need to find.

Re: MAD MAX: Day 5

Posted: Fri Oct 28, 2016 10:21 pm
by Quin
Sloonei wrote:
Quin wrote:
Sloonei wrote:Who are you gonna vote for, Mr Quin?
indiglo. What's your take on the case against him?
I've been on the fence about her most of the time. I see the case against her but I've had a hard time deciding whether or not her frustration comes from a townie or a scum point of view. Her vote today is the strongest evidence that it's a scum perspective that I've seen all game, and that has put me over the edge in terms of suspecting her. I am fully willing to vote for her today. I just wish either her or Wilgy were here to address some concerns, as they seem to be everyone's top suspects.

Even if we are right about those two, there still remains a third bad guy who we'll need to find.
Why does her Wilgy vote seem bad to you? Is it the choice or the lack of justification behind it?

As for her frustration, I initially wanted to read it as civ. The fact that her personality did a complete 180 is proof enough for me that the frustration was genuine, at least. But now I don't think I can justify civ reading it when she's not given me a more concrete reason to read her as good.

Re: MAD MAX: Day 5

Posted: Fri Oct 28, 2016 10:29 pm
by Sloonei
Quin wrote:
Sloonei wrote:
Quin wrote:
Sloonei wrote:Who are you gonna vote for, Mr Quin?
indiglo. What's your take on the case against him?
I've been on the fence about her most of the time. I see the case against her but I've had a hard time deciding whether or not her frustration comes from a townie or a scum point of view. Her vote today is the strongest evidence that it's a scum perspective that I've seen all game, and that has put me over the edge in terms of suspecting her. I am fully willing to vote for her today. I just wish either her or Wilgy were here to address some concerns, as they seem to be everyone's top suspects.

Even if we are right about those two, there still remains a third bad guy who we'll need to find.
Why does her Wilgy vote seem bad to you? Is it the choice or the lack of justification behind it?

As for her frustration, I initially wanted to read it as civ. The fact that her personality did a complete 180 is proof enough for me that the frustration was genuine, at least. But now I don't think I can justify civ reading it when she's not given me a more concrete reason to read her as good.
It was the lack of justification. The case around her is largely built on inactivty, and I think that if she was town she could/would have taken the easy route by simply producing as much content as she's able. But she has not, and this leads me to feel like she's lacking motivation, and that this lack of motivation results from her feeling like she subbed into a lost cause. Her vote today was nothing but a bare minimum effort driveby vote, which suggeste even more than she's lacking motivation. I think that mindset is more likely in a baddie than a townie.

Re: MAD MAX: Day 5

Posted: Fri Oct 28, 2016 11:22 pm
by Sloonei
Here's a rainbow list.

Jay

Quin

insertnamehere
zebra/epi 2.0
motel room
Glorfindel
LoRab
Dom


Mac

Scotty

DrWilgy
Indiglo


Assuming INH is Silvertongue.
I'd like to revisit LoRab, Dom, and Mac later when I'm not absorbed in a baseball game or at work. I've mostly been going off of gut for those three without giving them much of a substantial look.

I feel better about Scotty today but the combination of him + sprityo still has not done enough to win me over.
I think we all agree that Wilgy and indiglo are suspects. indiglo seems to be the more popular of the two. I'm fine with either one.

Re: MAD MAX: Day 5

Posted: Sat Oct 29, 2016 12:08 am
by JaggedJimmyJay
Hello crew.

Car post. From the passenger seat. There doesn't seem to be much to talk about. Maybe a good opportunity for someone with more time to ISO a high content swing player like MacDougall. Or Glorfindel, since suspicion on him seems to be semi-consistent but also vague.

Re: MAD MAX: Day 5

Posted: Sat Oct 29, 2016 1:13 am
by Glorfindel
JaggedJimmyJay wrote:That's just a bit too speculative for my comfort, Matty, regarding what INH may or may not have done with any night actions in his period of frustration. If Silvertongue saved INH, and INH himself wasn't the one to do that -- I can only see one other player in this game who'd be likely to take that action: you. And I only say that now because you're currently promoting the notion that it wasn't him.

I don't recall anyone having enough trust in INH to make that decision. I myself was far from certain about him flipping mafia, but I still wouldn't have stopped the lynch if I could have. I felt it was something we needed to get past. If someone else did save him though don't take this as an admonishment.
I'm genuinely sorry that you see it that way, Jay. I accept your opinion but respectfully disagree. Perhaps someone did have enough trust in INH to make that judgement of him but wasn't prepared to do so publicly :shrug:

Further to the opinions you've expressed about Indiglo's vote today, I would agree that it does look somewhat opportunistic and not a postive point in her favour. You've said that her reaction in this situation is not what you'd have expected based on your experience with her from previous games. She, herself said:
indiglo wrote:I'm not being sour grapes either, because I sub into games all the time - I'm practically a professional sub. I've probably subbed into more games that I've signed up for. I've never gotten this type of reception. Even when I've subbed in for a baddie who slipped up, and I come in as the clean up man. Now that's a tough situation to sub into. This is just an annoying situation to sub into.
Her frustration in this post (and others) speak to her level of frustration that you believe is uncharacteristic of her. Do you have any possible explanations that would justify her frustration given you believe it is indeed uncharacteristic of her?

Re: MAD MAX: Day 5

Posted: Sat Oct 29, 2016 1:36 am
by Scotty
JaggedJimmyJay wrote:Hello crew.

Car post. From the passenger seat. There doesn't seem to be much to talk about. Maybe a good opportunity for someone with more time to ISO a high content swing player like MacDougall. Or Glorfindel, since suspicion on him seems to be semi-consistent but also vague.
Amateur :grin:

Re: MAD MAX: Day 5

Posted: Sat Oct 29, 2016 1:39 am
by Scotty
Sloonei wrote:Here's a rainbow list.

Jay

Quin

insertnamehere
zebra/epi 2.0
motel room
Glorfindel
LoRab
Dom


Mac

Scotty

DrWilgy
Indiglo


Assuming INH is Silvertongue.
I'd like to revisit LoRab, Dom, and Mac later when I'm not absorbed in a baseball game or at work. I've mostly been going off of gut for those three without giving them much of a substantial look.

I feel better about Scotty today but the combination of him + sprityo still has not done enough to win me over.
I think we all agree that Wilgy and indiglo are suspects. indiglo seems to be the more popular of the two. I'm fine with either one.
Quite a lot of civ reads there, Sloons. Seeing as I know I am good, I'm wondering how you'll start weeding out some of those green daffodils from the rest.

I'm also surprised you still haven't changed your vote. Why would make you move your vote to indi like you say you might?

Re: MAD MAX: Day 5

Posted: Sat Oct 29, 2016 1:44 am
by JaggedJimmyJay
I never drive the tour bus. I'm Neil Hartley.

Re: MAD MAX: Day 5

Posted: Sat Oct 29, 2016 2:18 am
by Dom
Epignosis wrote:
Dom wrote:Mac is making me nervous.
How so?
I feel like he isn't really *participating* like civ Mac does.
DrWilgy wrote:
Sloonei wrote:
Scotty wrote:Dom: GOOD
DrWilgy: BAD
Epignosis 2.0: GOOD
Glorfindel: BAD
Indiglo: BAD
insertnamehere: GOOD
JaggedJimmyJay: GOOD
LoRab: GOOD
MacDougall: GOOD
motel room: GOOD
Quin: BAD
Sloonei: BAD


I feel like Glorf could go either way for me, and I'm still operating under the assumption that INH saved himself.
Quin is literally a gut read based on dribblings of post she he has made, and I have no evidence to think him bad besides that.
indi and wilgy seem to be pretty universally suspected. I am confident that we can find at least one baddie between the two of them.

I'm surprised at your bad reads on myself and Quin, Scotty. Can you explain those?
What is up with these all encompassing blame trains?

Just u wait Sloon... ONE DAY I'LL HAVE TIME TO POST
So... you had time to make this post, but not one to tell us who you're suspicous of?

Re: MAD MAX: Day 5

Posted: Sat Oct 29, 2016 2:29 am
by Sloonei
Scotty wrote:
Sloonei wrote:Here's a rainbow list.

Jay

Quin

insertnamehere
zebra/epi 2.0
motel room
Glorfindel
LoRab
Dom


Mac

Scotty

DrWilgy
Indiglo


Assuming INH is Silvertongue.
I'd like to revisit LoRab, Dom, and Mac later when I'm not absorbed in a baseball game or at work. I've mostly been going off of gut for those three without giving them much of a substantial look.

I feel better about Scotty today but the combination of him + sprityo still has not done enough to win me over.
I think we all agree that Wilgy and indiglo are suspects. indiglo seems to be the more popular of the two. I'm fine with either one.
Quite a lot of civ reads there, Sloons. Seeing as I know I am good, I'm wondering how you'll start weeding out some of those green daffodils from the rest.

I'm also surprised you still haven't changed your vote. Why would make you move your vote to indi like you say you might?
There are quite a lot of civs left and not so many baddies. I sense that you are tunneling me at the moment, or at least making it a point to grill me.

I plan to take a look at those folks at the bottom of the green pile whenever I muster up the energy for it. I'm going to have time this weekend. Everyone in the light green shade has at least some question marks. It's really just those two at the top that I feel confident in.

Re: MAD MAX: Day 5

Posted: Sat Oct 29, 2016 2:34 am
by Sloonei
And I've not changed my vote yet because numbers. I like to leave the poll open early in the day so that it doesn't become lopsided in favor of one player and kill the moment of other discussions. My vote is on indiglo in spirit and it'll be moved there later.

Re: MAD MAX: Day 5

Posted: Sat Oct 29, 2016 8:28 am
by Quin
I did a vote. Goodnight.

Re: MAD MAX: Day 5

Posted: Sat Oct 29, 2016 10:55 am
by Epignosis
All right kiddies.
Elohcin wrote:I'm here! I voted for 24 hours b/c I think we should get started as soon as possible. It's been weeks since I played mafia. And, this is a speed game.

I won't be around for the beginning though. I will be out late tonight. But I may be able to come in after I get home.
Nothing from this post.
Elohcin wrote:
Epignosis wrote:Voting Eloh.
:omg: loon.
:noble:
Elohcin wrote:
MovingPictures07 wrote:
JaggedJimmyJay wrote:It pains me to disparage a lady, but I do believe Elohcin's response to that random vote from her husband was a bit lifeless. Considering she is here to see Neil Hartley live and in the flesh, I know she isn't that bored. The look on her face, it's giving Neil the wrong impression.
:ponder:
So yeah, it was like after midnight when I posted that response to Epi. Maybe that's why it seems lifeless. Last night was my monthly ladies night out and I didn't come home until I had my fill of caramel apple sangria.

I cannot even remember what emoji I used. Wait....I do remember. Was it was "I'm wacko" one :omg: ...I think so. That emoji makes me think of someone being crazy and silly with their post/vote. I actually didn't even look to see he ACTUALLY voted for me. I thought he was kidding at the time. Maybe I ought to vote him back :p But probably not as I might be voting to save myself with it being so close and all.

I know nothing of this show, so JJJ is confusing me a bit. I may vote him. It seems a little 'trying too hard' to come in here role play like that right off the bat. Like he is trying to win us over. What do y'all think? And this is not WIFOM talking...whatever that is. I never understood that term completely. but you all seem to use it for when you go after someone who has gone after you? I don't know.

I'll hold off on voting for now.
This post on its own makes 3J look good. There wasn't the deliberateness associated with an under-the-bus maneuver.

I'm going to skip over posts I get nothing from.
Elohcin wrote:I honestly don't know what to say in defence. There is nothing to defend against. Your role playing or lack thereof confuses me.
This reinforces my opinion of 3J. So do the next few posts in the history.
Elohcin wrote:
Sloonei wrote:
Elohcin wrote:
JaggedJimmyJay wrote:
Elohcin wrote:going for self preservation here...
What's ya beef with the bird with teeth?
Nome...it was one of two
..him or Mac. No need.
Votes are changeable and the day is barely half over. This is not the time to be casting preservation votes. Vote wherever your suspicions are!
Oh my goodness! I was thinking days were 24 hours for some reason! I thought I got my vote in like 3 minutes before the bell!!! I wake up this morning looking hard for a host post and everything. GAH! I'm gettin' OLD. Someone save me!!

Okay, I have like 2 pages to catch up on. I am busy today, but I will get there eventually.
This thing here.

If Elohcin had a decent team, she should have known when the Day phase ended. I'm reading this as genuinely clueless, and not feigned. So what does that mean?

Elohcin loves BTSC, and she loves talking with her team about anything and everything. She's a talker.

Couple that post with the following:
Elohcin wrote:I honestly don't know what to say in defence. There is nothing to defend against. Your role playing or lack thereof confuses me.
Elohcin wrote:going for self preservation here...
And what you have is an indication that her team wasn't on the same page Day 1. Consider:

1. Eloh genuinely didn't know the Day phase was 48 hours.
2. That means nobody on her team told her / they weren't focused on Day 1 strategy
3. Eloh ends up voting Scotty instead of holding out and making it a tie. I think that's significant. If she was that interested in saving herself, she only needed to vote last minute against someone with one vote and make it a however-many-way tie, and there would likely have been a no-lynch. She didn't do that. She went for Scotty.

Then this:
Elohcin wrote:
Sloonei wrote:Having said that, I'm moving my vote back to Elohcin for the reasons I mentioned earlier. I'm off to work now, so I won't be posting much at all, but i'll try to glance at my phone when I can to stay loosely caught up. Don't be surprised if I cast a sudden and silent vote near the end of the day. I do that sometimes at work and people always freak out about it.
You said if it was true that I thought it was a 24 hour Day 1 that you wouldn't look at me as bad. Then you say you're moving your vote back to me. What gives?
S~V~S wrote:
Sloonei wrote:birdwithteeth has not posted in this game yet. That is the entirety of the case against him. Scotty always votes a no-show or low poster on Day 1. Elohcin voted purely out of self-preservation.
But MacDougall had more votes than BWT when Eloh voted, yes?

I only skimmed this AM, I will read back to when I told Rico I was going to step back when I get home in about 1.5 hours.
No, they both had two votes. And I thought it was like 3 minutes til EoD!
LoRab wrote:Epi expressed suspicion of Elo earlier, which interests me because they read each other well. Would love for him to elaborate on his thoughts.
I seriously thought his actions were a joke or trying to get a rise out of me or something. I think my reaction was what would determine his thoughts of me. Too bad I had to react after midnight after several drinks (when I don't drink often at all). It probably is what started me off on the wrong track for this game.

Now, as for my vote today (Day 1 :ike: ) I can see where scotty can be bad. I am moving my vote there. I don't want to vote BWT if I don't have to. Hate to lose a possible civ position even if it's a quiet one.
Uh-huh.

Eloh doesn't want to vote birdie, who hadn't been there, as I recall. An absent teammate is still a teammate.

I have to leave soon, but I will be back. I'm voting indiglo based on the above. Also
Elohcin wrote:
Epignosis wrote:
MovingPictures07 wrote:Epi, please elaborate your feelings regarding Elo if you don't mind.
Nice gal. I like her a lot.

Do you honestly think I'd have anything concrete to say about her based on the few posts she has, several of which were about thinking the Day ended after 24 hours?
I knew you had nothing on me. Now I am a top suspect b/c you decided to be silly and call out my name. Thanks a lot, bub.

And, why did you change to sanmateo or whatever. Has he/she even posted yet?
:noble:

Re: MAD MAX: Day 5

Posted: Sat Oct 29, 2016 2:14 pm
by Tangrowth
I want some brains.

Re: MAD MAX: Day 5

Posted: Sat Oct 29, 2016 2:29 pm
by G-Man
MovingPictures07 wrote:I want some brains.
You're looking for the Wisard of Oz. This is Mad Max. Wrong game, bub.

Re: MAD MAX: Day 5

Posted: Sat Oct 29, 2016 3:10 pm
by DrWilgy
MovingPictures07 wrote:I want some brains.
I'll give u brains alright.

Re: MAD MAX: Day 2

Posted: Sat Oct 29, 2016 3:23 pm
by DrWilgy
Taking a look at Sloonei and I have some things I found that I didn't respond to before.
Sloonei wrote:Taking a look at Wilgy.
DrWilgy wrote:
a2thezebra wrote:
DrWilgy wrote:
a2thezebra wrote:Voting Ricochet. If anyone's here, ask me questions and I'll ask you questions back. Let's generate some content. Deal?
Where do you read me zeebs?
Null, but GTH good because with what content you have, you haven't given me a reason to think otherwise. Where do you read me?
GTH good.

I have barely read the thread though. What do you think of Mac Declining my invite to team up?
These represent his first real posts in the game. On the one hand I want to like that he's able to produce a GTH read on the spot, but on the other I can't like it too much since he discredits himself by being honest and telling us he hasn't read the thread. This post does nothing for me.
DrWilgy wrote:
a2thezebra wrote:What is your strongest read at the moment, considering that you haven't fully caught up?
Baddie Rico with potential as Mac temmie.

I don't think Rico is the type to lose sight of what would gain him advantage in the game for a policy lynch.

What do you think was the most interesting exchange so far?
He's at least loosely on the Rico bandwagon here. I don't like that, but he did give a reason to feel that way so it's not the worst. What I do like is his question. I thought it was a good early game, looking-to-get-involved type of question. This brief appearance is what I was referencing earlier when I said I gave him an early town read. When he came in here it looked like he was genuinely trying to both get himself involved and get others thinking about things in the game.
DrWilgy wrote:
a2thezebra wrote:DrWilgy, do you have any other gut and/or vibe-based reads you would like to share?
The only other player that I have thought about is Sprityo, whom I gut read as bad.

I like your analysis of Rico. I'd like an answer from Rico as to why he thought to interject here. Not sure if this has been explained yet or not, but I'm not willing to go back and check.

Zebra, how would you respond to me voting Rico right now?

Sloonei, mind telling me the exchange that interested you most?
He lists sprityo as an early baddie read. I'd be interested to hear how that's developed. He also gave me and LoRab gut scum reads. I think he's since dropped the read on me,and his LoRab read seems to have been dependent on Rico being bad as well.

Turns out that his most substantial post in the game to this point is a big one about why LoRab is bad. Interesting. I don't think it's all consistent. For instance, the second to last point he makes in this post indicates that a certain post of LoRab's was directed toward him, when it was really directed at Jay.

So I dunno. There's not much here. There are a few things that give me slight town vibes in his post history but nothing overwhelming. A lack of content is always going to be a concern, so I can't do much with Wilgy right now.
So in regards to the inconsistency that you believe tou saw, the subject of my post was mostly LoRab ignoring my question. The 1 or 2 quotes above the one you claim to be inconsistent is the subject (the question), and the following quotes were to show that the question was ignored.

What are your thoughts on this now that I've explained this error?

Re: MAD MAX: Day 5

Posted: Sat Oct 29, 2016 3:25 pm
by DrWilgy
I'm shifting my focus. I should be looking at Elo's posts because I have yet to do so.

Re: MAD MAX: Day 5

Posted: Sat Oct 29, 2016 4:36 pm
by Sloonei
Moved my vote to indiglo before I fall asleep.

Re: MAD MAX: Day 5

Posted: Sat Oct 29, 2016 5:34 pm
by insertnamehere
So.

Let me attempt to clear the air here.

Frankly, I'm ashamed of what I said in the thread, and would honestly prefer for it to be deleted. I hope to move forward for however long I'm in the game in a much more relaxed manner.

I could explain that this was in the middle of a schedule-packed part of my life, but that's an excuse. There's really not a great reason for what I said. It was stupid, petty, and dumb.

I'm catching up with the thread now, and will comment on anything that grabs my attention.

Re: MAD MAX: Day 4

Posted: Sat Oct 29, 2016 5:40 pm
by insertnamehere
motel room wrote:
insertnamehere wrote:voting glorfindel

if I die tomorrow, legacy reads are as follows

Lorab: scum
motel room: scum
glorf: scum
indi: civ (spooky, scary, I know)
wilgy: civ

literally everyone else I feel biased against.
If you come back

Why is your read of indiglo spooky scary? You haven't mentioned her at all yet from what I can see.
I empathized with her frustration, and nothing against her seemed at all compelling to me. I said that this was a "spooky scary" read because other than myself, she was the person generating the most heat at that point in the thread. Not agreeing with the other popular case that could potentially overtake the one against myself wasn't a smart move, and I knew that at the time. But it was my read, and this was at the point of the meltdown where I didn't care what other people thought.

Re: MAD MAX: Day 5

Posted: Sat Oct 29, 2016 5:57 pm
by Glorfindel
insertnamehere wrote:So.

Let me attempt to clear the air here.

Frankly, I'm ashamed of what I said in the thread, and would honestly prefer for it to be deleted. I hope to move forward for however long I'm in the game in a much more relaxed manner.

I could explain that this was in the middle of a schedule-packed part of my life, but that's an excuse. There's really not a great reason for what I said. It was stupid, petty, and dumb.

I'm catching up with the thread now, and will comment on anything that grabs my attention.
It's awesome to have you back, my friend :bighug: Please don't give what happened a second thought and (at least for me) consider it forgotten.

Re: MAD MAX: Day 5

Posted: Sat Oct 29, 2016 6:03 pm
by Epignosis
And I didn't even read it. :grin:

Re: MAD MAX: Day 4

Posted: Sat Oct 29, 2016 6:06 pm
by insertnamehere
DharmaHelper wrote:Rainbow lists are dumb and bad
please play again.

Re: MAD MAX: Night 4

Posted: Sat Oct 29, 2016 6:30 pm
by insertnamehere
MovingPictures07 wrote:a gigantic black hole of sheer frustration sucking in my soul.
that sounds about right.

Re: MAD MAX: Night 4

Posted: Sat Oct 29, 2016 6:40 pm
by insertnamehere
motel room wrote:Here's whats been on my mind -

The silvertongue character can stop a lynch not necessarily "save a person". I don't understand who as town, and silvertongue is town, would have wanted to stop that lynch except for INH. But I want to hear what INH thinks.

If it wasn't him, I don't think silvertongue would have to hide that they had stopped the lynch by contributing to the INH wagon or caring about the EOD tie. Im saying this cos Glorfindel was awfully slow acting (at least what it seemed to me) when he arrived and saw a tie - so I was thinking he could have PM'd the mod then and went to stop the lynch before getting into voting but that doesn't make much sense. So it would be someone off-wagon.

But I want to hear what INH thinks.
what do you want from me, motel room? :shrug:

All I'm gonna say on the subject is that I'm considering randomizing my vote for the foreseeable future.