The Syndicate

Posted: **Mon Jun 01, 2015 11:34 pm**

I look forward to that glorious future

I doubt the rest of you do, though. Good Luck, y'all gonna need it

Posted: **Mon Jun 01, 2015 11:37 pm**

Honestly, I just voted quickly. I had one minute until the vote ended and I did NOT want to miss another one.

Posted: **Mon Jun 01, 2015 11:50 pm**

Crystle isn't very bright.

Posted: **Tue Jun 02, 2015 12:00 am**

This is at least the second time Spacedaisy has voted

Posted: **Tue Jun 02, 2015 12:04 am**

sorry guys... Disregard my fluke vote

Posted: **Tue Jun 02, 2015 12:26 am**

I'm just the normal kind of dead.

Too bad I can't meat any cute girls here.

Posted: **Tue Jun 02, 2015 3:06 am**

The poll time has reached an unsustainable point for me, and my efforts to dial it back have been futile. Your patience today will be appreciated.

Posted: **Tue Jun 02, 2015 3:19 am**

Wow. That was very interesting indeed.

As much as I have been thinking Isaac is bad - Rebecca, Ruth, Samuel... a who's who of people without the best voting records... that looked an awful lot like a save could have gone in. And this late in the game, they might be feeling like a single lynch could swing it...

If Ruth survives this and we discover Isaac is a vanilla civvie, I'd say Samuel and Rebecca would be a very good place to look for heathen.

Posted: **Tue Jun 02, 2015 3:21 am**

Not to mention Deborah!

Posted: **Tue Jun 02, 2015 6:29 am**

Even if Ruth lives, those guys look pretty bad, imo

Posted: **Tue Jun 02, 2015 6:59 am**

Who licked Balaam and his ass?

Poll ended at Mon Jun 01, 2015 11:36 pm

Absalom
0
No votes

Bathsheba
1
Esther (14)
5%

Deborah
0
No votes

Esther
0
No votes

Isaac
6
Rahab (11), Rebecca (12), Deborah (15), Spacedaisy (17), Ruth (18), Samuel (19)
32%

Jacob
0
No votes

Jonah
0
No votes

Lazarus
1
Lot (4)
5%

Lot
0
No votes

Malchus
0
No votes

Pilate
0
No votes

Rahab
0
No votes

Rebecca
0
No votes

Ruth
5
Isaac (7), Stephen (9), Absalom (10), Bathsheba (13), Jacob (16)
26%

Samuel
0
No votes

Stephen
0
No votes

Stubbornness (The Host, the Non, the Dead)
6
Epignosis (1), Metalmarsh89 (2), Balaam (3), MovingPictures07 (5), Long Con (6), XthAtGAm3RGuYX (8)
32%

Total votes : 19

Posted: **Tue Jun 02, 2015 7:15 am**

Second Mafioso

Chapter I

1 The people of Sin-d’kaht were troubled and sore afraid, for heathens still were among them. 2 They were aggrieved that Ruth was alive, and so they plotted a way to destroy her. 3 And while they plotted, some advised them, saying, “Leave Ruth alone, for she is the handiwork of death.” 4 But they heard that voice not, and proceeded to stone her. 5 They buried Ruth outside the city quickly in hopes that her harlotry was forgotten quickly. 6 For it was said by outsiders that she was resurrected by the Lord, and that the Lord was honoring her wicked ways. 7 “If she returns from the dead again, then we will know that it is the work of the Lord and not the work of Death. 8 But if she does not return, then we will know that it is not the work of the Lord.” 9 And in their haste, no man took sleep.

Posted: **Tue Jun 02, 2015 9:23 am**

I am happy now. Who are we lynching today? Lazarus? Isaac?

I'll be honest, the late train on Isaac (looking at you, Spacedaisy) makes me not want to vote for him very much.

Posted: **Tue Jun 02, 2015 9:24 am**

Looking back at the votes, I kind of want to lynch Rahab. This is yet another black mark on her already ebony record.

Posted: **Tue Jun 02, 2015 9:25 am**

ABSALOM, ABSALOM, ABSALOM!

Posted: **Tue Jun 02, 2015 9:28 am**

Seriously, that song starts playing in my head every time I see your name, Absalom.

Posted: **Tue Jun 02, 2015 9:47 am**

Good result! So, late train on me, huh? Lot, technicolor votes please?

Posted: **Tue Jun 02, 2015 11:34 am**

Sorry I missed the vote, I would have voted Ruth.

Does anyone know why the Chapters have restarted? Did we start a new Book?

Posted: **Tue Jun 02, 2015 12:20 pm**

Absalom wrote:I am happy now. Who are we lynching today? Lazarus? Isaac?

I'll be honest, the late train on Isaac (looking at you, Spacedaisy) makes me not want to vote for him very much.

I lean toward Lazarus though there is one thing I am wondering. If Lazarus is Simon what day did his votes start to accrue to Lot? It seems like there would be 7 or 8 by now and Ruth was lynched by only 5 votes. Wouldn't Lot have been lynched instead if he had votes accruing to him all this time? Lot, am I missing something here? Are you still thinking Lazarus is Simon the Zealot after last nights vote?

Esther i think you are just mad at me because i directed Absalom's question to you. I thought it was the fair thing to do - give you a chance to answer first. You seemed defensive at the time and now you just seem to be trying to find reasons to find me bad. I don't understand why you would doubt Epi subbed me in for Bathsheba 1.0. This happens all the time in games. And now you doubt Isaac is a replacement? Funny you never mentioned that before now.

Posted: **Tue Jun 02, 2015 12:34 pm**

I understand why my vote looks bad, but the truth is I came in thinking I may have missed the vote, saw I had literally one minute and voted in a panic. If I were a heathen, it would have been really fucking stupid to out myself in such a way to save a confirmed teammate. And I am not sure that I would have voted any differently if I had not cast a panic vote at the last minute. I don't trust a Rez by a dead role with a win con I don't know, but that I know wasn't on my team. So I stand by my vote.

I find it interesting that Lot, who pushed for us NOT to vote Ruth, is eyeballing the people who didn't. That makes no sense.

It would be a severe mistake to lynch me, I can say that. Because I am civ. I highly recommend you look elsewhere.

Posted: **Tue Jun 02, 2015 12:34 pm**

Also, I think there were only three or four votes that Laz voted Lot ifit not mistaken.

Posted: **Tue Jun 02, 2015 12:41 pm**

Pilate wrote:Sorry I missed the vote, I would have voted Ruth.

Does anyone know why the Chapters have restarted? Did we start a new Book?

Huh, didn't notice that. Weird.

Posted: **Tue Jun 02, 2015 12:43 pm**

Samuel wrote:Also, I think there were only three or four votes that Laz voted Lot ifit not mistaken.

Thanks Samuel - I'll count the votes. It didn't occur to me he didn't vote him every time. It just seems like it was a lot of times.

Linki: I also have no idea why the chapters started over. I don't know my bible as well as I should.

Posted: **Tue Jun 02, 2015 3:00 pm**

Absalom wrote:I am happy now. Who are we lynching today? Lazarus? Isaac?

I'll be honest, the late train on Isaac (looking at you, Spacedaisy) makes me not want to vote for him very much.

It looks like Lazarus never showed yesterday, so I'm fairly comfortable leaving him at least another day.

I agree with you that the train on Isaac leaves me fairly comfortable leaving him another day.

I'm feeling pretty civ about Rahab - I'm certain I know who is behind the sock and I think they know who I am too, which is why I think they were taking my lead on Isaac. But Rebecca, Deborah and Samuel all look snaky and in my opinion the worst of all over the last few votes is Samuel but, Isaac, I will be bringing out the technicolour vote lists shortly and you can all see.

@Bathsheba - I actually think Laz may have only voted for me twice at this point, maybe three times, but again I'll do those lists and see. The longer he just misses votes, the longer I'm ok delaying his lynch, because I'm only really worried when it starts getting up to four or five.

Posted: **Tue Jun 02, 2015 3:08 pm**

Balaam wrote:DAY 1 RESULTS:

1. SAMUEL (Paul)<---voter = NK'ed by heathens
2. SAMUEL (Samson)<---voter = civvie
3. LOT (Gideon)<---voter = NK'ed by heathens
4. UZZIAH (Pilate)
5. REBECCA (Rachel)<---voter = NK'ed by heathens
6. PAUL (Martha)<---voter = NK'ed by heathens
7. BARNABAS (Stephen)
8. UZZIAH (Job) <---voter = civvie
9. SAMSON (Mordecai)<===VOTER = HEATHEN
10. SAMSON (Mary Mag)<---voter = civvie
11. ABSALOM (Cain)<---voter = civvie
12. CAIN (Deborah)
13. CAIN (Absalom)
14. SAMSON (Isaac)
15. SAMSON (Jacob)
16. JEPHTHA (Rebecca)
17. ABSALOM (Malchus)
18. SAMSON (Jonathan)<---voter = civvie
19. MARY MAG (Jonah)
20. SAMSON (Belshazzar)<===VOTER = HORSEMAN
21. SAMSON (Samuel)
22. CAIN (Uzziah)<===VOTER = HEATHEN
23. JEPHTHAH (Lot)
24. PAUL (Nicodemus)<---voter = NK'ed by heathens
25. CAIN (Ruth)<===VOTER = HEATHEN
26. GIDEON (Hagar)<---voter was the civvie smited after our first 3 civ stonings
27. MARY MAG (Jephthah)<---voter = civvie
28. UZZIAH (Rahab)
29. CAIN (Balaam)<---voter = NK'ed by JUDAS for the Heathens

Not Voting: Barnabas, Bathsheba, Esther, Judah, Lazarus

DAY 1 RESULTS (alternate format):

9. SAMSON (Mordecai)<===VOTER = HEATHEN
10. SAMSON (Mary Mag)<---voter = civvie
14. SAMSON (Isaac)
15. SAMSON (Jacob)
18. SAMSON (Jonathan)<---voter = civvie
20. SAMSON (Belshazzar)<===VOTER = HORSEMAN
21. SAMSON (Samuel)

12. CAIN (Deborah)
13. CAIN (Absalom)
22. CAIN (Uzziah)<===VOTER = HEATHEN
25. CAIN (Ruth)<===VOTER = HEATHEN
29. CAIN (Balaam)<---voter = NK'ed by JUDAS for the Heathens

4. UZZIAH (Pilate)
8. UZZIAH (Job) <---voter = civvie
28. UZZIAH (Rahab)

1. SAMUEL (Paul)<---voter = NK'ed by heathens
2. SAMUEL (Samson)<---voter = civvie

6. PAUL (Martha)<---voter = NK'ed by heathens
24. PAUL (Nicodemus)<---voter = NK'ed by heathens

11. ABSALOM (Cain)<---voter = civvie
17. ABSALOM (Malchus)

16. JEPHTHA (Rebecca)
23. JEPHTHAH (Lot)

19. MARY MAG (Jonah)
27. MARY MAG (Jephthah)<---voter = civvie

3. LOT (Gideon)<---voter = NK'ed by heathens

5. REBECCA (Rachel)<---voter = NK'ed by heathens

7. BARNABAS (Stephen)

26. GIDEON (Hagar)<---voter was the civvie smited after our first 3 civ stonings

Not Voting:
Barnabas
Bathsheba
Esther
Judah<---voter was the civvie smote after our second 3 civ stonings
Lazarus

Balaam wrote:Day 2 Results:

1. JOB (Uzziah)<===VOTER = HEATHEN
2. UZZIAH (Job)<---voter = civvie
3. JOB (Rachel)<---voter = NK'ed by heathens
4. CAIN (Paul)<---voter = NK'ed by heathens
5. CAIN (Absalom)
6. CAIN (Belshazzar)<===VOTER = HORSEMAN
7. CAIN (Deborah)
8. CAIN (Malchus)
9. UZZIAH (Lot)
10. CAIN (Rahab)
11. STEPHEN (Stephen)
12. CAIN (Balaam)<---voter = NK'ed by JUDAS for the Heathens
13. JEPHTHAH (Rebecca)
14. ABSALOM (Lazarus)
15. UZZIAH (Jonathan)<---voter = civvie
16. CAIN (Bathsheba)

Not Voting: Barnabas (2), Cain, Esther (2), Gideon, Hagar, Isaac, Jacob, Jephthah, Jonah, Judah (2), Mary Mag, Mordecai, Nicodemus, Pilate, Ruth, Samuel

DAY 2 RESULTS (alternate format):

4. CAIN (Paul)<---voter = NK'ed by heathens
5. CAIN (Absalom)
6. CAIN (Belshazzar)<===VOTER = HORSEMAN
7. CAIN (Deborah)
8. CAIN (Malchus)
10. CAIN (Rahab)
12. CAIN (Balaam)<---voter = NK'ed by JUDAS for the Heathens
16. CAIN (Bathsheba)

2. UZZIAH (Job)<---voter = civvie
9. UZZIAH (Lot)
15. UZZIAH (Jonathan)<---voter = civvie

1. JOB (Uzziah)<===VOTER = HEATHEN
3. JOB (Rachel)<---voter = NK'ed by heathens

11. STEPHEN (Stephen)

13. JEPHTHAH (Rebecca)

14. ABSALOM (Lazarus)

Not Voting:
Barnabas (2)
Cain<---voter = civvie
Esther (2)
Gideon<---voter = NK'ed by heathens
Hagar<---voter was the civvie smited after our first 3 civ stonings
Isaac
Jacob
Jephthah<---voter = civvie
Jonah
Judah (2)<---voter was the civvie smited after our second 3 civ stonings
Mary Mag<---voter = civvie
Mordecai<===VOTER = HEATHEN
Nicodemus<---voter = NK'ed by heathens
Pilate
Ruth<===VOTER = HEATHEN
Samuel

Balaam wrote:DAY 3 Results:

1. UZZIAH (Job)<---voter = civvie
2. JOB (Uzziah)<===VOTER = HEATHEN
3. RACHEL (Lot)
4. RACHEL (Mary Mag)<---voter = civvie
5. UZZIAH (Nicodemus)<---voter = NK'ed by heathens
6. LAZARUS (Mordecai)<===VOTER = HEATHEN
7. JOB (Isaac)
8. RAHAB (Jonah)
9. UZZIAH (Absalom)
10. MARY MAG (Rebecca)
11. LAZARUS (Jonathan)<---voter = civvie
12. LAZARUS (Gideon)<---voter = NK'ed by heathens
13. MARY MAG (Jacob)
14. MARY MAG (Belshazzar)<===VOTER = HORSEMAN
15. MARY MAG (Jephthah)<---voter = civvie
16. MARY MAG (Deborah)
17. JOB (Rachel)<---voter = NK'ed by heathens
18. JOB (Esther)
19. ABSALOM (Lazarus)
20. UZZIAH (Rahab)
21. MARY MAG (Ruth)<===VOTER = HEATHEN
22. MARY MAG (Balaam)<---voter = NK'ed by JUDAS for the Heathens

Day 3 Not Voting: Barnabas (3), Bathsheba (2), Hagar (2), Judah (3), Malchus, Pilate (2), Samuel (2), Stephen

DAY 3 RESULTS (alternate format):

10. MARY MAG (Rebecca)
13. MARY MAG (Jacob)
14. MARY MAG (Belshazzar)<===VOTER = HORSEMAN
15. MARY MAG (Jephthah)<---voter = civvie
16. MARY MAG (Deborah)
21. MARY MAG (Ruth)<===VOTER = HEATHEN
22. MARY MAG (Balaam)<---voter = NK'ed by JUDAS for the Heathens

1. UZZIAH (Job)<---voter = civvie
5. UZZIAH (Nicodemus)<---voter = NK'ed by heathens
9. UZZIAH (Absalom)
20. UZZIAH (Rahab)

2. JOB (Uzziah)<===VOTER = HEATHEN
7. JOB (Isaac)
17. JOB (Rachel)<---voter = NK'ed by heathens
18. JOB (Esther)

6. LAZARUS (Mordecai)<===VOTER = HEATHEN
11. LAZARUS (Jonathan)<---voter = civvie
12. LAZARUS (Gideon)<---voter = NK'ed by heathens

3. RACHEL (Lot)
4. RACHEL (Mary Mag)<---voter = civvie

8. RAHAB (Jonah)

19. ABSALOM (Lazarus)

Day 3 Not Voting:
Barnabas (3)
Bathsheba (2)
Hagar (2)<---voter was the civvie smited after our first 3 civ stonings
Judah (3)<---voter was the civvie smited after our second 3 civ stonings
Malchus
Pilate (2)
Samuel (2)
Stephen

Balaam wrote:DAY 4 Results:

1. RACHEL (Pilate)
2. JOB (Uzziah)<===VOTER = HEATHEN
3. BALAAM (Absalom)
4. BALAAM (Nicodemus)<---voter = NK'ed by heathens
5. ABSALOM (Lazarus)
6. JOB (Rachel)<---voter = NK'ed by heathens
7. BALAAM (Rebecca)
8. JOB (Stephen)
9. JOB (Jonah)
10. JOB (Samuel)
11. LAZARUS (Mordecai)<===VOTER = HEATHEN
12. JOB (Balaam)<---voter = NK'ed by JUDAS for the Heathens
13. UZZIAH (Ruth)<===VOTER = HEATHEN
14. LAZARUS (Rahab)
15. RACHEL (Job)<---voter = civvie
16. BALAAM (Jephthah)<---voter = civvie
17. JOB (Esther)
18. JOB (Jonathan)<---voter = civvie
19. BALAAM (Judah)<---voter was the civvie smited after our second 3 civ stonings
20. DEBORAH (Deborah)
21. JOB (Belshazzar)<===VOTER = HORSEMAN

Not Voting: Barnabas (4), Bathsheba (3), Isaac (2), Jacob (2), Lot, Malchus (2)

DAY 4 RESULTS (alternate format):

2. JOB (Uzziah)<===VOTER = HEATHEN
6. JOB (Rachel)<---voter = NK'ed by heathens
8. JOB (Stephen)
9. JOB (Jonah)
10. JOB (Samuel)
12. JOB (Balaam)<---voter = NK'ed by JUDAS for the Heathens
17. JOB (Esther)
18. JOB (Jonathan)<---voter = civvie
21. JOB (Belshazzar)<===VOTER = HORSEMAN

3. BALAAM (Absalom)
4. BALAAM (Nicodemus)<---voter = NK'ed by heathens
7. BALAAM (Rebecca)
16. BALAAM (Jephthah)<---voter = civvie
19. BALAAM (Judah)<---voter was the civvie smited after our second 3 civ stonings

1. RACHEL (Pilate)
15. RACHEL (Job)<---voter = civvie

11. LAZARUS (Mordecai)<===VOTER = HEATHEN
14. LAZARUS (Rahab)

5. ABSALOM (Lazarus)

13. UZZIAH (Ruth)<===VOTER = HEATHEN

20. DEBORAH (Deborah)

Not Voting:
Barnabas (4)
Bathsheba (3)
Isaac (2)
Jacob (2)
Lot
Malchus (2)

Balaam wrote:DAY 5 Results:

1. UZZIAH (Pilate)
2. JEPHTHAH (Rebecca)
3. UZZIAH (Stephen)
4. UZZIAH (Absalom)
5. SAMUEL (Jephthah)<---voter = civvie
6. UZZIAH (Jonathan)<---voter = civvie
7. STEPHEN (Uzziah)<===VOTER = HEATHEN
8. JEPHTHAH (Lot)
9. UZZIAH (Esther)
10. JEPHTHAH (Samuel)
11. SAMUEL (Belshazzar)<===VOTER = HORSEMAN
12. UZZIAH (Ruth)<===VOTER = HEATHEN
13. ABSALOM (Lazarus)
14. UZZIAH (Rahab)
15. JEPHTHAH (Isaac)
16. UZZIAH (Rachel)<---voter = NK'ed by heathens
17. UZZIAH (Mordecai)<===VOTER = HEATHEN
18. MALCHUS (Deborah)
19. JEPHTHAH (Jonah)

Not Voting: Balaam, Bathsheba (4), Jacob (3), Judah (4), Malchus (3)

DAY 5 RESULTS (alternate format):

1. UZZIAH (Pilate)
3. UZZIAH (Stephen)
4. UZZIAH (Absalom)
6. UZZIAH (Jonathan)<---voter = civvie
9. UZZIAH (Esther)
12. UZZIAH (Ruth)<===VOTER = HEATHEN
14. UZZIAH (Rahab)
16. UZZIAH (Rachel)<---voter = NK'ed by heathens
17. UZZIAH (Mordecai)<===VOTER = HEATHEN

2. JEPHTHAH (Rebecca)
8. JEPHTHAH (Lot)
10. JEPHTHAH (Samuel)
15. JEPHTHAH (Isaac)
19. JEPHTHAH (Jonah)

5. SAMUEL (Jephthah)<---voter = civvie
11. SAMUEL (Belshazzar)<===VOTER = HORSEMAN

7. STEPHEN (Uzziah)<===VOTER = HEATHEN

13. ABSALOM (Lazarus)

18. MALCHUS (Deborah)

Not Voting:
Balaam
Bathsheba (4)
Jacob (3)
Judah (4)<---voter was the civvie smited after our second 3 civ stonings
Malchus (3)

Balaam wrote:DAY 6 Results:
1. RACHEL (Isaac)
2. RUTH (Absalom)
3. RUTH (Stephen)
4. ABSALOM (Pilate)
5. RUTH (Lot)
6. PILATE (Esther)
7. RUTH (Jephthah)<---voter = civvie
8. RACHEL (Rebecca)
9. RACHEL (Mordecai)<===VOTER = HEATHEN
10. PILATE (Rahab)
11. ABSALOM (Lazarus)
12. JACOB (Jonathan)<---voter = civvie
13. JACOB (Deborah)
14. RUTH (Rachel)<---voter = NK'ed by heathens
15. RACHEL (Jacob)
16. ABSALOM (Ruth)<===VOTER = HEATHEN
17. RUTH (Balaam)<---voter = NK'ed by JUDAS for the Heathens
18. RUTH (Belshazzar)<===VOTER = HORSEMAN
19. RUTH (Samuel)
20. RUTH (Bathsheba)

Not Voting: Jonah (2), Judah (5), Malchus (4)

DAY 6 RESULTS (alternate format):

2. RUTH (Absalom)
3. RUTH (Stephen)
5. RUTH (Lot)
7. RUTH (Jephthah)<---voter = civvie
14. RUTH (Rachel)<---voter = NK'ed by heathens
17. RUTH (Balaam)<---voter = NK'ed by JUDAS for the Heathens
18. RUTH (Belshazzar)<===VOTER = HORSEMAN
19. RUTH (Samuel)
20. RUTH (Bathsheba)

1. RACHEL (Isaac)
8. RACHEL (Rebecca)
9. RACHEL (Mordecai)<===VOTER = HEATHEN
15. RACHEL (Jacob)

4. ABSALOM (Pilate)
11. ABSALOM (Lazarus)
16. ABSALOM (Ruth)<===VOTER = HEATHEN

6. PILATE (Esther)
10. PILATE (Rahab)

12. JACOB (Jonathan)<---voter = civvie
13. JACOB (Deborah)

Not Voting:
Jonah (2)
Judah (5)<---voter was the civvie smited after our second 3 civ stonings
Malchus (4)

Day 7 Results:
1. JONATHAN (Absalom)
2. PILATE (Esther)
3. JONATHAN (Pilate)
4. REBECCA (Jephthah)<---voter = civvie
5. REBECCA (Jacob)
6. JONATHAN (Stephen)
7. PILATE (Rahab)
8. JEPHTHAH (Lot)
9. JEPHTHAH (Rebecca)
10. JEPHTHAH (Balaam)<---voter = NK'ed by JUDAS for the Heathens
11. JEPHTHAH (Samuel)
12. JEPHTHAH (Lazarus)
13. JEPHTHAH (Jonathan)<---voter = civvie
14. JONATHAN (Belshazzar)<===VOTER = HORSEMAN
15. JACOB (Rachel)<---voter = NK'ed by heathens
16. BALAAM (Mordecai)<===VOTER = HEATHEN

Not Voting:
Bathsheba (5), Deborah, Isaac (3), Jonah (3), Judah (6), Malchus (5)

DAY 7 RESULTS (alternate format):

8. JEPHTHAH (Lot)
9. JEPHTHAH (Rebecca)
10. JEPHTHAH (Balaam)<---voter = NK'ed by JUDAS for the Heathens
11. JEPHTHAH (Samuel)
12. JEPHTHAH (Lazarus)
13. JEPHTHAH (Jonathan)<---voter = civvie

1. JONATHAN (Absalom)
3. JONATHAN (Pilate)
6. JONATHAN (Stephen)
14. JONATHAN (Belshazzar)<===VOTER = HORSEMAN

2. PILATE (Esther)
7. PILATE (Rahab)

4. REBECCA (Jephthah)<---voter = civvie
5. REBECCA (Jacob)

15. JACOB (Rachel)<---voter = NK'ed by heathens

16. BALAAM (Mordecai)<===VOTER = HEATHEN

Not Voting:
Bathsheba (5)
Deborah
Isaac (3)
Jonah (3)
Judah (6)<---voter was the civvie smited after our second 3 civ stonings
Malchus (5)

Day 8 Results:
1. LAZARUS (Lot)
2. JONATHAN (Pilate)
3. JONATHAN (Stephen)
4. JONATHAN (Esther))
5. JONATHAN (Balaam)<---voter = NK'ed by JUDAS for the Heathens
6. JACOB (Rahab)
7. BALAAM (Mordecai)<===VOTER = HEATHEN
8. JACOB (Rachel)<---voter = NK'ed by heathens
9. JONATHAN (Absalom)
10. JONATHAN (Deborah)
11. JONATHAN (Belshazzar)<===VOTER = HORSEMAN
12. JONATHAN (Jacob)
13. JONATHAN (Jonah)
14. LAZARUS (Lazarus)
15. JONATHAN (Samuel)

Not Voting: Bathsheba (6), Isaac (4),Jonathan, Judah (7), Malchus (6), Rebecca

DAY 8 RESULTS (alternate format):

2. JONATHAN (Pilate)
3. JONATHAN (Stephen)
4. JONATHAN (Esther))
5. JONATHAN (Balaam)<---voter = NK'ed by JUDAS for the Heathens
9. JONATHAN (Absalom)
10. JONATHAN (Deborah)
11. JONATHAN (Belshazzar)<===VOTER = HORSEMAN
12. JONATHAN (Jacob)
13. JONATHAN (Jonah)
15. JONATHAN (Samuel)

6. JACOB (Rahab)
8. JACOB (Rachel)<---voter = NK'ed by heathens

1. LAZARUS (Lot)
14. LAZARUS (Lazarus)

7. BALAAM (Mordecai)<===VOTER = HEATHEN

Not Voting:
Bathsheba (6)
Isaac (4)
Jonathan<---voter = civvie
Judah (7)<---voter was the civvie smited after our second 3 civ stonings
Malchus (6)
Rebecca

Balaam wrote:And now for the Day 9 Results:

1. LAZARUS (Lot)
2. ISAAC (Isaac)
3. MORDECAI (Absalom)
4. MORDECAI (Pilate)
5. ISAAC (Esther)
6. ISAAC (Rahab)
7. MORDECAI (Stephen)
8. LOT (Lazarus)
9. ISAAC (Belshazzar)<===VOTER = HORSEMAN
10. ISAAC (Samuel)
11. MORDECAI (Jacob)
12. PILATE (Mordecai)<===VOTER = HEATHEN
13. MORDECAI (Samson)<---voter = civvie (wtf zombie vote????)

Not voting: Balaam (2), Bathsheba (7), Deborah (2), Jonah (4), Malchus (7), Rebecca (2)

DAY 9 RESULTS (alternate format):
3. MORDECAI (Absalom)
4. MORDECAI (Pilate)
7. MORDECAI (Stephen)
11. MORDECAI (Jacob)
13. MORDECAI (Samson)<---voter = civvie (wtf zombie vote????)

2. ISAAC (Isaac)
5. ISAAC (Esther)
6. ISAAC (Rahab)
9. ISAAC (Belshazzar)<===VOTER = HORSEMAN
10. ISAAC (Samuel)

1. LAZARUS (Lot)

8. LOT (Lazarus)

12. PILATE (Mordecai)<===VOTER = HEATHEN

Not Voting:
Balaam (2)<---voter = NK'ed by JUDAS for the Heathens
Bathsheba (7)
Deborah (2)
Jonah (4)
Malchus (7)
Rebecca (2)

HOST: Are you able to tell us yea or nay on whether Samson's vote counted?

Balaam wrote:Day 10 Results:

1. BELSHAZZAR (Absalom)
2. LAZARUS (Lot)
3. BELSHAZZAR (Isaac)
4. LOT (Lazarus)
5. BELSHAZZAR (Pilate)
6. ISAAC (Stephen)
7. BELSHAZZAR (Jacob)
8. STEPHEN (Samson)<---voter = civvie (wtf zombie vote????)
9. PILATE (Esther)
10. ISAAC (Rahab)
11. BELSHAZZAR (Deborah)
12. REBECCA (Belshazzar)<===VOTER = HORSEMAN
13. ISAAC (Rebecca)
14. BELSHAZZAR (Balaam)<---voter = NK'ed by JUDAS for the Heathens

Not Voting: Bathsheba (8), Jonah (5), Malchus (8), Samuel (2)

DAY 10 RESULTS (alternate format):
1. BELSHAZZAR (Absalom)
3. BELSHAZZAR (Isaac)
5. BELSHAZZAR (Pilate)
7. BELSHAZZAR (Jacob)
11. BELSHAZZAR (Deborah)
14. BELSHAZZAR (Balaam)<---voter = NK'ed by JUDAS for the Heathens

6. ISAAC (Stephen)
10. ISAAC (Rahab)
13. ISAAC (Rebecca)

2. LAZARUS (Lot)

4. LOT (Lazarus)

8. STEPHEN (Samson)<---voter = civvie (wtf zombie vote????)

9. PILATE (Esther)

12. REBECCA (Belshazzar)<===VOTER = HORSEMAN

Not Voting:
Bathsheba (8)
Jonah (5)
Malchus (8)
Samuel (2)

DAY 11 (or Second Mafioso: Day 1)

1. LAZARUS (Lot)
2. RUTH (Isaac)
3. RUTH (Stephen)
4. RUTH (Absalom)
5. ISAAC (Rahab)
6. ISAAC (Rebecca)
7. RUTH (Bathsheba)
8. BATHSHEBA (Esther)
9. ISAAC (Deborah)
10. RUTH (Jacob)
11. ISAAC (Ruth)<===VOTER = STILL HEATHEN
12. ISAAC (Samuel)

Not Voting: Jonah (6), Lazarus (2), Malchus (9), Pilate (3)

DAY 11 RESULTS (alternate format)

2. RUTH (Isaac)
3. RUTH (Stephen)
4. RUTH (Absalom)
7. RUTH (Bathsheba)
10. RUTH (Jacob)

5. ISAAC (Rahab)
6. ISAAC (Rebecca)
9. ISAAC (Deborah)
11. ISAAC (Ruth)<===VOTER = STILL HEATHEN
12. ISAAC (Samuel)

1. LAZARUS (Lot)

8. BATHSHEBA (Esther)

Not Voting:
Jonah (6)
Lazarus (2)
Malchus (9)
Pilate (3)

Posted: **Tue Jun 02, 2015 3:10 pm**

Also, it's possible Lazarus is tactically not voting some days, such as yesterday. The Zealot's role says:

"for each Day in a row that he votes the same person, his vote increases by one."

What's unclear to me is - epi, you could help her - If the zealot takes a day off from voting the same person, does their vote reset to being worth one?

Posted: **Tue Jun 02, 2015 3:30 pm**

A missed vote breaks the chain and it starts over.

Posted: **Tue Jun 02, 2015 3:35 pm**

So, Lazarus is no threat to me today if he is the zealot. It merely means my vote continues to be wasted.

I shall vote Lazarus, because he probably deserves it.

And I'll try to do a vote analysis of those who voted Isaac when I get a moment, to see if we can see some as more scummy than others.

Posted: **Tue Jun 02, 2015 3:49 pm**

All right, Lot. I g=could get behind a Deborah vote. Her Day 3, 4,and 5 votes all look pretty bad. Her Day 6 vote, and missing the Day 9 vote make her look less bad, but I see where you're coming from and I think the balance of the evidence points at her being Heathen.

Posted: **Tue Jun 02, 2015 4:22 pm**

Actually, I didn't notice before, but Samuel's voting record is downright terrible, but without the redeeming qualities of Deborah's. I'd vote for him today over her.

Posted: **Tue Jun 02, 2015 5:06 pm**

Absalom wrote:Actually, I didn't notice before, but Samuel's voting record is downright terrible, but without the redeeming qualities of Deborah's. I'd vote for him today over her.

I agree that Samuel looks the worst of them, and as of right now he is my preferred option. I want to go back and do a bit of a read and case though, we could get into trouble if we don't think things through. We also need to bear in mind that we don't know when Judas may have been recruited, so it's worth looking for someone with good early vote patterns that goes bad later.

PS Absalom - apologies for being so brutal yesterday, but hopefully you understand today why I was.

Posted: **Tue Jun 02, 2015 5:48 pm**

Let me be clear. Lynching me will not get the result you all are hoping for unless you are not a civ. No one good will like the end result. You can present voting records in whatever way you want. Civs can have bad voting records. I am not bad in any way shape or form. Lynching me would be a tactical mistake, plain and simple.

Posted: **Tue Jun 02, 2015 5:59 pm**

Samuel wrote:Let me be clear. Lynching me will not get the result you all are hoping for unless you are not a civ. No one good will like the end result. You can present voting records in whatever way you want. Civs can have bad voting records. I am not bad in any way shape or form. Lynching me would be a tactical mistake, plain and simple.

I am continually baffled that people think saying "I am not bad" without any accompanying evidence is persuasive.

Who do you think is bad and why, Sam?

Posted: **Tue Jun 02, 2015 6:02 pm**

It was surely curious wording too, don't you think Absalom?

Samuel wrote:Let me be clear. Lynching me will not get the result you all are hoping for unless you are not a civ. No one good will like the end result. You can present voting records in whatever way you want. Civs can have bad voting records. I am not bad in any way shape or form. Lynching me would be a tactical mistake, plain and simple.

In fact, Samuel never says 'I am a civilian' at all.

If I interpreted it purely at face value, my instinctual read is that Samuel is trying to imply he is a horseman with civ-friendly win conditions.

Posted: **Tue Jun 02, 2015 6:09 pm**

Lot wrote:It was surely curious wording too, don't you think Absalom?

Samuel wrote:Let me be clear. Lynching me will not get the result you all are hoping for unless you are not a civ. No one good will like the end result. You can present voting records in whatever way you want. Civs can have bad voting records. I am not bad in any way shape or form. Lynching me would be a tactical mistake, plain and simple.
In fact, Samuel never says 'I am a civilian' at all.

If I interpreted it purely at face value, my instinctual read is that Samuel is trying to imply he is a horseman with civ-friendly win conditions.

Or civ-unfriendly death conditions.

The question is, do we believe him?

Posted: **Tue Jun 02, 2015 6:14 pm**

Absalom wrote:Or civ-unfriendly death conditions.

The question is, do we believe him?

Indeed.

And my answer to the second is - let's see what he has to say first, and I still want to do the analysis of all Isaac voters before I think we should commit to any one specific direction.

Posted: **Tue Jun 02, 2015 6:33 pm**

Absalom wrote:I am happy now. Who are we lynching today? Lazarus? Isaac?

I'll be honest, the late train on Isaac (looking at you, Spacedaisy) makes me not want to vote for him very much.

Spacedaisy? This made me think maybe Absalom is MP. Which made the next couple of posts hilarious to me picturing MP talking to himself through separate accounts

MovingPictures07 wrote:Seriously, that song starts playing in my head every time I see your name, Absalom.

Bathsheba wrote:
Esther i think you are just mad at me because i directed Absalom's question to you. I thought it was the fair thing to do - give you a chance to answer first. You seemed defensive at the time and now you just seem to be trying to find reasons to find me bad. I don't understand why you would doubt Epi subbed me in for Bathsheba 1.0. This happens all the time in games. And now you doubt Isaac is a replacement? Funny you never mentioned that before now.

No, not mad at you at all. What did Absalom ask that you directed at me? And no, i think my case on you is legit.

I am not now doubting Isaac's replacement. I don't remember reading of his replacement, honestly. I know its not honorable, but I don't read every word, every post made in a game. I just simply don't have the time. I skim if I am behind and I do miss things.

Lot wrote:Also, it's possible Lazarus is tactically not voting some days, such as yesterday. The Zealot's role says:

"for each Day in a row that he votes the same person, his vote increases by one."

What's unclear to me is - epi, you could help her - If the zealot takes a day off from voting the same person, does their vote reset to being worth one?

Does that mean he gains a vote against him or does that mean his vote becomes worth 2, then 3, then 4, etc. Because if his vote increases, then why would he skip voting?

I agree about Samuel's voting record as well and would backup Lot and Absalom by voting there. But I am willing to hear him out as well.

Posted: **Tue Jun 02, 2015 6:39 pm**

Esther wrote:Because if his vote increases, then why would he skip voting?.

Two potential explanations for Lazarus skipping voting - one good, one bad.

1) If he is good, skipping voting means he won't vote me and thus won't lynch me (this also has the side effect that I don't try all out to lynch him) - good for the town overall.
2) If he is bad, skipping voting means there is never any firm evidence he is NOT the zealot.

Posted: **Tue Jun 02, 2015 8:22 pm**

I am civ.

I obviously don't trust isaac. Lot's recent behavior has me questioning him. I realize we have no reason basis to judge Bathsheba on, but I don't want to give someone a pass just because they replaced in. I don't know. If I had a better idea of who bad my voting record wouldn't be so bad now would it?

Posted: **Tue Jun 02, 2015 8:27 pm**

Samuel wrote:I am civ.

Well, that's settled then. Now if we can only get the Heathens to be so direct.

Samuel wrote: I obviously don't trust isaac. Lot's recent behavior has me questioning him. I realize we have no reason basis to judge Bathsheba on, but I don't want to give someone a pass just because they replaced in. I don't know. If I had a better idea of who bad my voting record wouldn't be so bad now would it?

So you don't think the wagon on Isaac means anything?
What behavior of Lot's?

Posted: **Tue Jun 02, 2015 8:30 pm**

I feel certain that Jonah is not a heathen. Either he is horseman or he is civ. Bit I think it is extremely unlikely he is heathen. I don't feel any need to vote there ay the moment.

And come on, why would a heathen vote for Ruth? That is the stupidest thing a heathen could have done. It would be an easy vote for her team matters to use to look civ. I voted the way I decided in that split second and I have no regrets about my vote. You are declaring isaac good based on my late vote in part. Consider if I am civ, what does that mean for isaac? I am civ.

Posted: **Tue Jun 02, 2015 8:35 pm**

Samuel wrote:I feel certain that Jonah is not a heathen. Either he is horseman or he is civ. Bit I think it is extremely unlikely he is heathen. I don't feel any need to vote there ay the moment.

And come on, why would a heathen vote for Ruth? That is the stupidest thing a heathen could have done. It would be an easy vote for her team matters to use to look civ. I voted the way I decided in that split second and I have no regrets about my vote. You are declaring isaac good based on my late vote in part. Consider if I am civ, what does that mean for isaac? I am civ.

Why did you feel the need to bring up Jonah all of a sudden? No one is talking about him and he hasn't said anything in days.

Posted: **Tue Jun 02, 2015 8:50 pm**

Because I was asked my opinions.

Posted: **Tue Jun 02, 2015 8:52 pm**

Absalom wrote:
Samuel wrote:I am civ.
Well, that's settled then. Now if we can only get the Heathens to be so direct.

Samuel wrote: I obviously don't trust isaac. Lot's recent behavior has me questioning him. I realize we have no reason basis to judge Bathsheba on, but I don't want to give someone a pass just because they replaced in. I don't know. If I had a better idea of who bad my voting record wouldn't be so bad now would it?
So you don't think the wagon on Isaac means anything?
What behavior of Lot's?

No I don't know that I put that much Weight in it consisting you believe my vote to be a wagon attempt to save Ruth even though it wasn't. I have the benefit of clear vision regarding my own vote because I know my alignment.

Posted: **Tue Jun 02, 2015 8:57 pm**

*considering, not consisting

Posted: **Tue Jun 02, 2015 8:58 pm**

Absalom wrote:
Samuel wrote:Let me be clear. Lynching me will not get the result you all are hoping for unless you are not a civ. No one good will like the end result. You can present voting records in whatever way you want. Civs can have bad voting records. I am not bad in any way shape or form. Lynching me would be a tactical mistake, plain and simple.
I am continually baffled that people think saying "I am not bad" without any accompanying evidence is persuasive.

Who do you think is bad and why, Sam?

Samuel, here is the question Absalom asked - who do you think is bad and why not who do you think is bad and good. Your answer just is odd in the context of the question. And by the way, you were supposed to explain why on people you think may be bad so could you explain why you think I could be bad? What have i done that causes you to think that over so many others. I am not saying you are bad here I'm just trying to understand your second response to Absalom and what your reasoning is on me.

Posted: **Tue Jun 02, 2015 9:01 pm**

No. You all have already decided to lynch me so do it. Then see how badly you have played this game. The mafia deserve to win frankly. I'm done talking.

Posted: **Tue Jun 02, 2015 9:09 pm**

The only thing I have left to say is that I did answer that question. I don't feel the need to be baited into more conversation that you will twist up. I am civ andLynching me will only hurt the civ win. But I don't really care. So let's have this lynch over. Vote me. Put your money where you mouth is and see just how bad all your logic is.

Posted: **Tue Jun 02, 2015 9:21 pm**

Lot wrote:Indeed.

And my answer to the second is - let's see what he has to say first, and I still want to do the analysis of all Isaac voters before I think we should commit to any one specific direction.

Samuel wrote:No. You all have already decided to lynch me so do it.

I'm really over this kind of attitude. It's exactly what Isaac said when he was first called out too. Being called suspicious is not the same as 'everyone has decided to lynch me'. There is nothing that turns me into tunnel-vision-central quite as badly as the person who thinks that getting a bit of suspicion as the same as 'you all want to lynch me'.

So, lets play 'be a civilian' for a second - can you not see how suspicious Isaac's vote train looks even if YOU are civ.

Posted: **Tue Jun 02, 2015 9:24 pm**

Samuel wrote:No. You all have already decided to lynch me so do it. Then see how badly you have played this game. The mafia deserve to win frankly. I'm done talking.

I can't speak for others, but I haven't decided any such thing. I am curious about the Jonah reference though. Why did you bring him up instead of Malchus or someone else inactive? It was so out of the blue and specific. I'm interested in weird things.

You say you don't believe there was a wagon on Isaac because your vote was honest, but those things aren't mutually exclusive. Your vote could be honest, and Rahab's and Deborah's could be sinister.

Why do the mafia deserve to win when we've lynched all but two of them? I think we're doing rather well. If you really are concerned about the civ cause, try helping us baddie hunt instead of pouting. It's unbecoming.

The Syndicate

Biblical Mafia [ENDGAME]

Re: Biblical Mafia [CHAPTER I]

Re: Biblical Mafia [CHAPTER I]

Re: Biblical Mafia [CHAPTER I]

Re: Biblical Mafia [CHAPTER I]

Re: Biblical Mafia [CHAPTER I]

Re: Biblical Mafia [CHAPTER I]

Re: Biblical Mafia [CHAPTER I]

Re: Biblical Mafia [CHAPTER I]

Re: Biblical Mafia [CHAPTER I]

Re: Biblical Mafia [CHAPTER I]

Re: Biblical Mafia [POLLS]

Re: Biblical Mafia [CHAPTER I]

Re: Biblical Mafia [CHAPTER II]

Re: Biblical Mafia [CHAPTER II]

Re: Biblical Mafia [CHAPTER II]

Re: Biblical Mafia [CHAPTER II]

Re: Biblical Mafia [CHAPTER II]

Re: Biblical Mafia [CHAPTER II]

Re: Biblical Mafia [CHAPTER II]

Re: Biblical Mafia [CHAPTER II]

Re: Biblical Mafia [CHAPTER II]

Re: Biblical Mafia [CHAPTER II]

Re: Biblical Mafia [CHAPTER II]

Re: Biblical Mafia [CHAPTER II]

Re: Biblical Mafia [CHAPTER II]

Re: Biblical Mafia [CHAPTER II]

Re: Biblical Mafia [CHAPTER II]

Re: Biblical Mafia [CHAPTER II]

Re: Biblical Mafia [CHAPTER II]

Re: Biblical Mafia [CHAPTER II]

Re: Biblical Mafia [CHAPTER II]

Re: Biblical Mafia [CHAPTER II]

Re: Biblical Mafia [CHAPTER II]

Re: Biblical Mafia [CHAPTER II]

Re: Biblical Mafia [CHAPTER II]

Re: Biblical Mafia [CHAPTER II]

Re: Biblical Mafia [CHAPTER II]

Re: Biblical Mafia [CHAPTER II]

Re: Biblical Mafia [CHAPTER II]

Re: Biblical Mafia [CHAPTER II]

Re: Biblical Mafia [CHAPTER II]

Re: Biblical Mafia [CHAPTER II]

Re: Biblical Mafia [CHAPTER II]

Re: Biblical Mafia [CHAPTER II]

Re: Biblical Mafia [CHAPTER II]

Re: Biblical Mafia [CHAPTER II]

Re: Biblical Mafia [CHAPTER II]

Re: Biblical Mafia [CHAPTER II]

Re: Biblical Mafia [CHAPTER II]

Re: Biblical Mafia [CHAPTER II]