The Syndicate

Dana wrote:Are we allowed to talk to dead people?

NO!

Roxy wrote:

Dana wrote:Are we allowed to talk to dead people?

NO!

Alright! Are we allowed to talk to the hosts?

Dana wrote:

Roxy wrote:

Dana wrote:Are we allowed to talk to dead people?

NO!

Alright! Are we allowed to talk to the hosts?

NO!

Also I meant in thread, not just freely talk to them. I just didn't know if we're supposed to ignore all the red writing.

Yeah, dead people can't talk on topic. The Mods will delete on topic dead people posts. Dead people should talk about eating brainzzz and begging to be rezzed and shit like that.

S~V~S wrote:Yeah, dead people can't talk on topic. The Mods will delete on topic dead people posts. Dead people should talk about eating brainzzz and begging to be rezzed and shit like that.

Alright, thank you for the clarification, friend!

Dana wrote:

Roxy wrote:

Dana wrote:Are we allowed to talk to dead people?

NO!

Alright! Are we allowed to talk to the hosts?

Ofc! We are very handy when you have questions

Dana wrote:

S~V~S wrote:Yeah, dead people can't talk on topic. The Mods will delete on topic dead people posts. Dead people should talk about eating brainzzz and begging to be rezzed and shit like that.

Alright, thank you for the clarification, friend!

Some sites don't let dead people talk at all; I got banned on STV for making ONE off topic deadie post. I think it was "Aww " or something like that. Tough crowd.

Roxy wrote:

Dana wrote:

Roxy wrote:

Dana wrote:Are we allowed to talk to dead people?

NO!

Alright! Are we allowed to talk to the hosts?

Ofc! We are very handy when you have questions

But can I talk to the hosts without questions? I just want to make new friends!

S~V~S wrote:

Dana wrote:

S~V~S wrote:Yeah, dead people can't talk on topic. The Mods will delete on topic dead people posts. Dead people should talk about eating brainzzz and begging to be rezzed and shit like that.

Alright, thank you for the clarification, friend!

Some sites don't let dead people talk at all; I got banned on STV for making ONE off topic deadie post. I think it was "Aww " or something like that. Tough crowd.

Oh man, that's pretty strict! They never let you back in?

Dana wrote:

Roxy wrote:

Dana wrote:

Roxy wrote:

Dana wrote:Are we allowed to talk to dead people?

NO!

Alright! Are we allowed to talk to the hosts?

Ofc! We are very handy when you have questions

But can I talk to the hosts without questions? I just want to make new friends!

Yes.....
Your Hosts think new friends can be cool but they have to love The Beatles and not be afraid of Porcupines that can be quite disgruntled.

Yes, look at Roxy's signature. ^

I will be traveling again tomorrow, further than last time, so I don't expect to be in the thread at all. Should be able to rejoin Wed. and stay until we drive home on Sat.

Svs i just wasnt sure if you were being genuine with Made or not, but im very inclined to.believe you were soi will not be voting you after a reread. Also, my other suspect Bullz is now off the poll so now I'm stumped on where to vote again.

RIP reywaS

Pardon my ignorance once again SVS, but what is a "ninja" in mafia terms?

Dana, the cat in your icon is ADORABLE. Is he/she yours?

Roxy wrote:

Dana wrote:

Roxy wrote:

Dana wrote:

Roxy wrote:

Dana wrote:Are we allowed to talk to dead people?

NO!

Alright! Are we allowed to talk to the hosts?

Ofc! We are very handy when you have questions

But can I talk to the hosts without questions? I just want to make new friends!

Yes.....
Your Hosts think new friends can be cool but they have to love The Beatles and not be afraid of Porcupines that can be quite disgruntled.

The Beatles just happen to be one of the 10 bands I actually know! I'm not afraid, I met someone's pet porcupine the other day. It was super cute!

nijuukyugou wrote: Dana, the cat in your icon is ADORABLE. Is he/she yours?

Thank you! Yes, she is my kitty. Her name is Angela and she is very photogenic!

nijuukyugou wrote:RIP reywaS

Pardon my ignorance once again SVS, but what is a "ninja" in mafia terms?

Dana, the cat in your icon is ADORABLE. Is he/she yours?

Once again? Have I been condescending? I apologize if this is the case.

A ninja is a civvie killer.

Seriously, have I been condescending? I worry about stuff like that, I worry about hurting peoples feelings, etc. If i have done so, if I have made you feel ignorant, I am so sorry. You say "once again" like there is a pattern of this kind of thing, and if that is so, I apologize.

S~V~S wrote:Seriously, have I been condescending? I worry about stuff like that, I worry about hurting peoples feelings, etc. If i have done so, if I have made you feel ignorant, I am so sorry. You say "once again" like there is a pattern of this kind of thing, and if that is so, I apologize.

Sometimes people call me condescending too. It's so cute of them.

thellama73 wrote:

S~V~S wrote:Seriously, have I been condescending? I worry about stuff like that, I worry about hurting peoples feelings, etc. If i have done so, if I have made you feel ignorant, I am so sorry. You say "once again" like there is a pattern of this kind of thing, and if that is so, I apologize.

Sometimes people call me condescending too. It's so cute of them.

Sooo I have a ton of pages to catch up on. May not finish tonight, so slow down the chitter chatter ya'll.

Back in a flash....(like an hour)

Hedgeowl wrote:Sooo I have a ton of pages to catch up on. May not finish tonight, so slow down the chitter chatter ya'll.

Back in a flash....(like an hour)

While you're catching up, feel free to ignore anything Dana said about me.

thellama73 wrote:

Hedgeowl wrote:Sooo I have a ton of pages to catch up on. May not finish tonight, so slow down the chitter chatter ya'll.

Back in a flash....(like an hour)

While you're catching up, feel free to ignore anything Dana said about me.

Or take it into consideration and make up your own mind! You are freeeeeeeeee, you can think for yourself! Don't listen to the little Llama voice inside your head!!!

I never do. Pesky l'il Llama voice, go away!

S~V~S wrote:I never do. Pesky l'il Llama voice, go away!

Hahaha, you wish!

Canucklehead, I don't understand why I'm expected to post a case on SVS when everything I've found scummy about her I've pointed out already. If anything that post led me to the conclusion of you being her teammate more likely, although heaven forbid one of you two start claiming that the bulk of my case rested on you being on the same team if the other is revealed to be town. But to remind the rest of town:

1. Opportunistic vote for MR, covered by a claim of putting faith in one of MY overconfident, unwarranted reads, and subsequent disappointment in me after the flip, taking no responsibility for her own vote.

2. Sloppy, rehearsed defenses and a derailment towards Made to distract from the case against her, leading toward a civilian lynch that could've easily been prevented. Again I will say that anyone in Misfits should have known that Made was town in this game. SVS's sarcastic response to my initial statement of that post was ironic because without the orange font, it could easily interpreted as favoring my argument. Yes, an enthusiastic teenager Mafia will not be expected to change his game up, and it's funny that that would be your counterargument because it was clear before the lynch that he didn't change his game up at all. Did you think his plan was to act the same way he did in Misfits and get away with it as scum? If he was scum, then it would make more sense that he would act differently. But he acted the same, and yet didn't rely on meta as a defense, unlike you.

3. The classic pitying act. "Woe is me, the rest of town just can't handle my godlike reads, I have no choice but to give up. See? Only town would do this, therefore instead of actually putting up a good defense for myself I would use this gambit to attempt to show you something that only a town would do. A sad, sad, town. That's me. I'm town." Although I don't give SVS enough credit here. She disguised her I'm-town-and-I-give-up act as something else, and was that she...wanted to wait to defend herself? I don't know, but points for originality, even though I can't begin to imagine how that's managed to fool anyone.

4. Not following through with the classic pitying act. SVS has continued to post, and has done so because she realized that her act wasn't as convincing as it seemed before she tried it. Her defenses? Meta, as I mentioned earlier. "See, you guys know that I wouldn't be playing like this if I were scum, therefore I'm not scum! Ta-daaaa! don't lynch me plz"

Also I'm alarmed at how little comments there were regarding my thoughts on Canuck.

"Classic pitying act"? Classic where?

Look, I have defended and extensively. Sorry if it is not enough for you, Please vote for me

Linki, thats cause the cases have been basically Meta.

Won't you feel silly when my classic pitying act and sloppy contrived defenses prove to be ...TRUE!!!

Probably not, ha ha.

I missed your thoughts on Canuck, Keterman. Now that I go back and look at them, they are astonishingly astute. I've been increasingly suspicious of Canuck this game as well. Her posting pattern alone indicates someone who spends most of their time in a chatzy and occasionally pops in to contribute when needed.

thellama73 wrote:I missed your thoughts on Canuck, Keterman. Now that I go back and look at them, they are astonishingly astute. I've been increasingly suspicious of Canuck this game as well. Her posting pattern alone indicates someone who spends most of their time in a chatzy and occasionally pops in to contribute when needed.

I feel like she has been very active (but that is probably because she keeps wanting to discuss me, haha).

Rey Weird choice since I don't remember him posting much of anything

S~V~S wrote:

Dana wrote:

S~V~S wrote:Yeah, dead people can't talk on topic. The Mods will delete on topic dead people posts. Dead people should talk about eating brainzzz and begging to be rezzed and shit like that.

Alright, thank you for the clarification, friend!

Some sites don't let dead people talk at all; I got banned on STV for making ONE off topic deadie post. I think it was "Aww " or something like that. Tough crowd.

Didn't about 6 people get banned that game? and then mafia was never played again haha
They could be strict, but I miss some of the old STV crew though. Rox - remember bassb? hahaha If/when we get together this month we will reminisce

S~V~S wrote:Linki, thats cause the cases have been basically Meta.

Look at this post, everyone. Denying the case to avoid making a good defense.

S~V~S wrote:Won't you feel silly when my classic pitying act and sloppy contrived defenses prove to be ...TRUE!!!

Probably not, ha ha.

Probably not he won't feel silly, or probably not they won't be proved true?

fingersplints wrote:(the account for Rolling Stones was Mr. D. llama and hedgeowl might remember that account being in the baddie chat some.)

I do! You even shared pics, because you knew we wouldn't recognize you irl.

fingersplints wrote:The title of the poll says you must answer me these questions three. So do we need to answer all of them? I will anyways
my name is mandi. My favorite color is purple. (particularly a nice light shade. like lilacs) Rox already knows both these things. So I will vote for the quest. Today my quest is to make it to Buffalo. I need to be fingerprinted, get a iris scan, and find the Anchor Bar (Home of the buffalo chicken wing)

:swoon: one of my besties in college is from Buffalo and would always have Anchor Bar sauce in her dorm. I ate jars of that stuff on pizza and still have it in my fridge when I can. <3

So much reading is making my brains hurt...

Guys I really advise us SVS isn't the way to go today. Re read her and see her behavior is genuine. Voting for her is going to cause us to miss a Baddie once again. The ones pushing so hard for her have my eyes IMO.

Keterman wrote:

S~V~S wrote:Linki, thats cause the cases have been basically Meta.

Look at this post, everyone. Denying the case to avoid making a good defense.

I did make good defenses. Please point out specific things I have not addressed.

fingersplints wrote:

S~V~S wrote:Won't you feel silly when my classic pitying act and sloppy contrived defenses prove to be ...TRUE!!!

Probably not, ha ha.

Probably not he won't feel silly, or probably not they won't be proved true?

Probably not he won't feel silly. People who are always so sure never do.

Boogs wrote:Guys I really advise us SVS isn't the way to go today. Re read her and see her behavior is genuine. Voting for her is going to cause us to miss a Baddie once again. The ones pushing so hard for her have my eyes IMO.

This post is very scummy. You want to change the course of the day yet provide no explanation as to why or how we should listen to your suggestion. Why isn't SVS the way to go? How is her behavior genuine (telling us to reread her isn't nearly enough, I provided points as to how it's NOT genuine, why not provide points to the contrary?)? Why do the ones pushing her have your eyes? (and in your opinion, as if there are other opinions as to where your eyes should be directed)

Just a really forced post all-around.

linki-If you claim to have addressed the points, why admit that your defenses were meta-based, and use that as your reason for not providing more convincing defenses when the points against you are not meta-based?

Dude, show me the points i have not addressed. Otherwise save your intense rhetoric. I am happy to address them since i am not bad

I do believe most of them are meta, yes. But feel free to prove me wrong.

More than anything you are reminding me of you in Fight Club, Keterman, when you were SO SURE LC was a civ, and Llama was bad (and the truth was the exact opposite).

Unlike some of the folks that have come for me, i think you are likely civ, as you were in that game. I also see civ BWT; he is earnest and not remotely being opportunistic.

Mongoose wrote:

thellama73 wrote:I missed your thoughts on Canuck, Keterman. Now that I go back and look at them, they are astonishingly astute. I've been increasingly suspicious of Canuck this game as well. Her posting pattern alone indicates someone who spends most of their time in a chatzy and occasionally pops in to contribute when needed.

I feel like she has been very active (but that is probably because she keeps wanting to discuss me, haha).

She has been active, but there have been long pauses between her activity, as one would expect from someone who checks into a chatroom before posting.

Point 1 isn't meta-based. Point 2 is meta-based regarding Made but not regarding you. Point 3 isn't meta-based. Point 4 isn't meta-based.

Keterman wrote:Canucklehead, I don't understand why I'm expected to post a case on SVS when everything I've found scummy about her I've pointed out already. If anything that post led me to the conclusion of you being her teammate more likely, although heaven forbid one of you two start claiming that the bulk of my case rested on you being on the same team if the other is revealed to be town. But to remind the rest of town:

1. Opportunistic vote for MR, covered by a claim of putting faith in one of MY overconfident, unwarranted reads, and subsequent disappointment in me after the flip, taking no responsibility for her own vote.

2. Sloppy, rehearsed defenses and a derailment towards Made to distract from the case against her, leading toward a civilian lynch that could've easily been prevented. Again I will say that anyone in Misfits should have known that Made was town in this game. SVS's sarcastic response to my initial statement of that post was ironic because without the orange font, it could easily interpreted as favoring my argument. Yes, an enthusiastic teenager Mafia will not be expected to change his game up, and it's funny that that would be your counterargument because it was clear before the lynch that he didn't change his game up at all. Did you think his plan was to act the same way he did in Misfits and get away with it as scum? If he was scum, then it would make more sense that he would act differently. But he acted the same, and yet didn't rely on meta as a defense, unlike you.

3. The classic pitying act. "Woe is me, the rest of town just can't handle my godlike reads, I have no choice but to give up. See? Only town would do this, therefore instead of actually putting up a good defense for myself I would use this gambit to attempt to show you something that only a town would do. A sad, sad, town. That's me. I'm town." Although I don't give SVS enough credit here. She disguised her I'm-town-and-I-give-up act as something else, and was that she...wanted to wait to defend herself? I don't know, but points for originality, even though I can't begin to imagine how that's managed to fool anyone.

4. Not following through with the classic pitying act. SVS has continued to post, and has done so because she realized that her act wasn't as convincing as it seemed before she tried it. Her defenses? Meta, as I mentioned earlier. "See, you guys know that I wouldn't be playing like this if I were scum, therefore I'm not scum! Ta-daaaa! don't lynch me plz"

Also I'm alarmed at how little comments there were regarding my thoughts on Canuck.

And now point 5, a grain of salt: Why say "I'm not bad" rather than "I'm good/civvie/town"?