

Moderator: Community Team
I was getting nervous. I should have known you wouldn't abandon me!Canucklehead wrote:FS is not a baddie. Do not vote for her.
Nope. Only I deserve to win.Golden wrote:RIP sophie!!! I'm sorry you didn't win, clearly you deserved to.
Epignosis wrote:If llama is good, it means we exist in a universe in which multitasking llama can call out the first of two mafia while simultaneously calling out two civilians.
I don't want to live in that universe.
Only the weasels deserve to win.thellama73 wrote:Nope. Only I deserve to win.Golden wrote:RIP sophie!!! I'm sorry you didn't win, clearly you deserved to.
If you deserve to win then I deserve to win.thellama73 wrote:Nope. Only I deserve to win.Golden wrote:RIP sophie!!! I'm sorry you didn't win, clearly you deserved to.
Turnip Head wrote:I for one welcome our new zombie and llama overlords. May their reign be long, and may their cases always be on point.
Yeah, but I know all the presidents in order.Zomberella12 wrote:If you deserve to win then I deserve to win.thellama73 wrote:Nope. Only I deserve to win.Golden wrote:RIP sophie!!! I'm sorry you didn't win, clearly you deserved to.
P.S. I know who ALL the baddies are - dead and alive
Epignosis wrote:If llama is good, it means we exist in a universe in which multitasking llama can call out the first of two mafia while simultaneously calling out two civilians.
I don't want to live in that universe.
I know all the presidents in backwards order... and I'm not even American!thellama73 wrote:Yeah, but I know all the presidents in order.Zomberella12 wrote:If you deserve to win then I deserve to win.thellama73 wrote:Nope. Only I deserve to win.Golden wrote:RIP sophie!!! I'm sorry you didn't win, clearly you deserved to.
P.S. I know who ALL the baddies are - dead and alive
You'll notice that he sidesteps Golden's (accurate) point that MP's pushing of MM was a way of turning the conversation away from Aces. Cleverly, he instead FURTHER turns the conversation away from Aces by pretending like Aces is some vague and mysterious character that he couldn't possibly have an opinion on, and that also he's hosting him so he shouldn't comment (more on this later), and that what we should REALLY be talking about is MM and how many people are voting for him and who started the train and....Aces, who is Aces??MovingPictures07 wrote:This is an interesting theory, but it's wrong because I'm not bad.Golden wrote:I'll add to this, because I think I should get this out in case something goes wrong.
Aces was around the thread and on the site plenty after he stopped posting. Eventually he backed off, hoping that suspicion of him died away and if he let it go I would stop posting about him and the lynch would go another way.
Shortly after, MP comes in and starts pushing for an MM lynch. He takes the heat off Golden v Aces (he doesn't see anything there), and makes several pushes to lynch MM. He doesn't vote for MM, but Aces does.
If Aces is bad, I think MP has done a very classic team tactic to get the heat off Aces and put it on someone else. If we were to lynch Aces today and he's bad, we'd do well to back it up with MP tomorrow.
You misunderstand me. I was not pushing an MM lynch. I expressed my thoughts not only about MM but about every other player about whom I had thoughts. I said I intended to vote BF or MM, but I thought my intention was that I was leaning more toward a BF vote because I actually find his behavior more suspect. Re-read what I've said and let me know if you think that was not the case.
You say I saw nothing between you and Aces and that is true. I haven't played with you or Aces in a long time, and I'm accustomed to Aces being quiet and not aggressive. I saw him aggressive in Death Note, and I won't elaborate since the game is ongoing and I have inside knowledge, but inevitably that influences my viewpoint of him. I don't have a read on either of you at the moment. How is that taking the heat off of you and Aces?
Now, with that said, I do find MM's self-vote and leave trick counterproductive, and while I do think a vote for him is based on principle (as rabbit astutely observed), but I also think a vote for him made sense in-game as well. If someone is going to vote out the player on D1 who had contributed little to baddie hunting, surely MM would be a candidate.
I don't understand how I was the one pushing an MM lynch when many players latched onto the comment made by LC. I merely expressed my thoughts about self-voting and MM's lack of baddie hunting.
I am a bit shocked how many folks voted for MM, but I don't see why they shouldn't have. It does make me a bit nervous though, especially Aces, who I was almost certain was going to vote for you.
Hmmmm. It seems MP actually has a pretty precise opinion on Aces (and is totes willing to talk about his ongoing game) when it can be used to help justify Zomb's "huge asset" comment and take Some of the heat of his teamies....MovingPictures07 wrote:Rabbit, if it helps, Aces played Death Note almost exactly as he has now, and he helped lynch a civilian. He was NKed, so his alignment is unknown.
MovingPictures07 wrote:Woah, wait a minute. Didn't you voice some suspicion (differentued from mine) of BF earlier, after previously saying you didn't want to vote for him because it was his first game back in a while, and THEN later say you could see yourself voting MM for his self-vote.fingersplints wrote:I'm voting zombrella in case I fall asleep before the lynch is over. I don't see how she could say Aces is a huge asset and is now backpedaling away. I am actually very excited to play with Aces, as I don't think I have in years, but he hasn't posted a lot and I don't see him as contributing significantly more then the other two she mentioned. And I don't see how one civvie death would be more important then another. What if Ace has a lousy ability and llama has a game changing one
I don't know. Something is just not sitting right with me there.
Where does this come from? Why did you not mention either of those previous thoughts of yours at all?
This pinged me.
Whoa, nelly!! Llama's post was CLEARLY jokey and light hearted, but MP panics and is all like "I'm not defending zomba, what're you talking about? Why would I defend zomba! It's not like she's on my team and totally just messed up and called our other teammate a huge asset or anything!".MovingPictures07 wrote:I'm not defending Zomba; I'm calling out splintseu for inconsistencies and I would like her to explain. Do you not agree with my observations?thellama73 wrote:Geez, MP. If you love Zombrella so much, maybe you should just marry her. Snowman's not around, you know.
MovingPictures07 wrote:I do admit it's weird. I have to head out now, but with time pending, I'll re-read Aces after I let D1 sink in and let you know if I find anything of note. Upon reading his posts in real time, I don't have an opinion, but I suppose that's true of roughly 75% or more of the players right now for me. Maybe my opinion of him is unfairly being painted by DN and trying to compare it with games I played with Aces years ago where he was much quieter.Golden wrote:Pinged me too. Once again, if that comment from zombs is suspicious, then it's suspicious to SAVE ACES.MovingPictures07 wrote:Woah, wait a minute. Didn't you voice some suspicion (different from mine) of BF earlier, after previously saying you didn't want to vote for him because it was his first game back in a while, and THEN later say you could see yourself voting MM for his self-vote.fingersplints wrote:I'm voting zombrella in case I fall asleep before the lynch is over. I don't see how she could say Aces is a huge asset and is now backpedaling away. I am actually very excited to play with Aces, as I don't think I have in years, but he hasn't posted a lot and I don't see him as contributing significantly more then the other two she mentioned. And I don't see how one civvie death would be more important then another. What if Ace has a lousy ability and llama has a game changing one
I don't know. Something is just not sitting right with me there.
Where does this come from? Why did you not mention either of those previous thoughts of yours at all?
This pinged me.
I just feel like the civvies are spreading their votes all over the show and getting played.
My current suspect list is as follows:
1) BF
2) MM
3) Splints
4) juliets
Two things stand out to me here: first, the strange linking together in his first paragraph of Bass and Blooper. While I had mentioned Blooper in my post (because bf had brought up both names together as being low posters), I did so explicitly to say that I was not suspicious of her at the time. It's super odd to me, then, that in his direct response to me, MP automatically links them together in the context of my suggestion that Bass's vote (not Blooper's, who I said I thought was civ) had been controlled by the Judge. MP says "I didn't even think of that when I read through yesterday, I suppose because I've been just seeing standard behavior from Bass and Blooper and haven't felt pinged by either of them.".........which is pretty strange, since I only mentioned being pinged by Bass. An unconscious coupling of Bass and Bloops in MPs mind? Just a little odd semantic thing, but interesting in retrospect.MovingPictures07 wrote:Canuck, that's outstanding analysis. I didn't even think of that when I read through yesterday, I suppose because I've been just seeing standard behavior from Bass and Blooper and haven't felt pinged by either of them. I think you're probably onto something. I'm curious what Bass is thinking for today's cycle and hopefully he can defend against the points you've made. I would say I'm definitely leaning in that direction for a vote now, but that I agree with BF's most recent post that we should discuss this out fully and figure out where we should go. I don't think people should give up who they feel is most suspicious to vote someone less so (like I did against BF on D1, lol), but we definitely want to avoid a super spread out vote today because I feel that was dangerous yesterday.
BF, I'm glad we've both been able to take a step back on that matter. not cleared, but you're definitely not even within my radar of possible votes today.
![]()
BF, what in particular about Sophie's posts have been alarming? I didn't intend on harping on her today or voting for her because I'm trying to reevaluate, but I am curious: What do you make of her switch from focusing on low posters to abandoning it completely? That and her lack of transparency is what was throwing me off.
I'll be busy today because I'm spending one of my last days with Annie before she goes to Houston for training for her new job, but I promise to be back at least once before I cast my vote if I can.
This is funny, splints, because you pretty much stole almost everything I was thinking about these two players when I read BF's post. Now I feel weird because this doesn't happen to me often due to my talking too much. :Pfingersplints wrote:I had the same feeling about both. I always get a bit paranoid about quieter players since they seem careful and don't really post enough to give you any reason to be able to suspect them. I'm not sure if I would consider either quieter then normal. I'm trying to compare ninja's game now to when I have seen her as a baddie, but I can only think of Zelda she was bad in. so I'm curious what llama thinks since he was her teammate that game. (I guess Elo too since she was her teammate that game too. no offense Elo, but I trust llama more this game, and that's the only reason I am more curious what he thinks)blindfaeth wrote:Yeah, there was definitely not enough chatter last day period. And the vote was super scattered because of it.MovingPictures07 wrote: What is everyone else thinking? I feel we definitely need to see if we can have more discussion today because there was not enough last Day period.
I think my gut is telling me bea or zombs, personally. I'd also like to point spotlights at Bass and nijuu - if for no other reason, I sense they are flying way under the radar. I don't hear them being mentioned enough at all. Does anyone have a reason these two could be naughty? Their relative silence makes me nervous-
I don't know about bass. I was giving him the BOTD for all the game since he has RL stuff, but i agree he should be looked closer at. I am not suspicious of him for voting me, but I don't like that he still really hasn't elaborated. I guess I just feel that if he was bad, he would have voted for one of the more serious vote getters instead of voting for me. but I'd have to check the timing of his vote and how many were placed/left to see. When I saw his mom last though, she did say he learned everything he knows about mafia from SVS, so he might be more devious then expected
Regarding Blooper's bad game, she's like juliets to me. I can never tell whether she's being bad or good, all of her posts just read Blooper to me, so my opinion on her is probably worthless.
So, this is a great post because MP gets to laugh genuinely at their gambit working, gets to do some distancing by getting his vote in early and with no fuss, and gets to get the ball really rolling on the LC framing. Well played.MovingPictures07 wrote:LMAO!! This is classic. I'm so disappointed I didn't get to see this unfold in action. Sorry, Bass, but this is just too funny.
I'm pretty much in agreement with the sentiments expressed by Canuck that, while I could entertain this to be intentional, it does not appear to be. There were no votes cast at the time, right? And I echo that LC's two subsequent posts struck me as odd as well, like he was trying to play it off.
Man, I feel like I have nothing to contribute for the second time this day period. Stop having all the fun without me, guys!
I have to pop back out of here and I am not sure whether I'll be back in time later AND there's no reason to hold my vote. Lol. So I'll vote now. I'll go ahead and vote for Bass. I understand and share Canuck's paranoia, but looking at it rationally I don't think we have to worry about another switch; I think that was a one-time deal. If someone wants to put a vote or two elsewhere though, I don't see the harm in that.
Votes Bass
This is astute, BF, I think you're right.blindfaeth wrote:Well and keep in mind doom probably submits the player they vote for and Maybe which role should do it. But he isn't picking the specific player, or else he'd know everyone in the mafia team.
Epi, is this how Doom's power works?
Duly noted, BF, thanks. I'm interesting though, what do you make of this in light of the recent... events? :Pblindfaeth wrote:FWIW re Sophie this was one of the other alarming posts I saw. I thought the chatter about "so kill me, I'm civ And it will hurt the cause" was a little.. Unnecessary? Not that many were talking about her at this point to really make her a main lynch candidate, so it feels like an over reaction to me. I've done this before when I'm bad. You feel like everyone is accusing you but really it's only a couple people.Sophie wrote:why are so many people vouching for MP? that makes me nervous, first BR and LC, then bea, am probably missing soeone
whaths the rest of the people take on MP?
all i gotta say about me is im civvie, it might sounded that i contradicted mtself, but i just made a mistake i cant explain in the thread, im just saying the civvies will sufer a lot if i die, but, then again, it could help the case cause then civvies will know who to lynch next. im ok to being killed, i dont think i will be offendidly (thats probably isnt even a word) defeinding myself on the thread or pulling quotes and posts. Im civvie but if you dont wanna believe me its fine. I trust it will be ok in the end and the civvies left will do whats gotta be done
He eventually does vote Ninja, once it seems clear that the popular opinion is with saving LC for another day, but that's because he knows the baddies have a save up their sleeves. His fake frustration after the failed lynch is pretty funny, in retrospect.MovingPictures07 wrote:Fair enough. I still stand by my feelings on the matter, but I can see where you're coming from, and your perspective probably makes more logical sense.Canucklehead wrote:Yes, but because I have doubt about that (and doubt about his Judge-ness), I think Ninja is a much better bet. LC isn't going anywhere, and there is a LOT more uncertainty surrounding him. I think the prudent thing to do is lynch a weasel, and wait to see what people like Eloh have to offer about LC as the day goes on.MovingPictures07 wrote:Duly noted, splints, I'll go check the roles again. Admittedly I don't have them all memorized.
What do you mean? Not sure I follow.Canucklehead wrote:I don't understand why your uncertainty about LC being the Judge and zomba's and the baddies knowledge or lack thereof acctually makes you want to vote LC more?? Shouldn't that put doubt in your mind and make you want to vote him less.....or at least tomorrow??MovingPictures07 wrote:Wow, Canuck, that's astute. I hadn't been pinged at all by Blooper but when you present her posts like that, I don't understand how I wasn't. Very good detective work.
Here's where I'm at right now:
Blooper: Solid candidate for Toon Patrol, possibility for Judge (though no reason to believe it's true, IMO), possibility for civilian (seems doubtful about Canuck's points, but still a possibility)
LC: Solid candidate for Toon Patrol, solid candidate for Judge (though I still don't understand why Zomba is acting like she KNOWS LC is Judge), practically no possibility for civilian (I suppose it's possible but I don't see it)
I see the point regarding if LC is the Judge, then what's the point in lynching him today? It's a very good counterargument, and I otherwise would be leaning Blooper, but there are two questions I have that I just don't understand:
1) How would Zomba know that LC is the Judge?
2) How would a baddie team know that LC is the Judge and devise a plan for Bass to slip up, on purpose? In this case, both the baddie team would have to either know LC is the Judge OR have gotten lucky, AND the slip up had to be purposeful, which frankly I still don't believe is the case.
I could see why a vote for either candidate would be prudent today, but I personally am still leaning LC.
I still think there's a solid possibility that LC is Toon Patrol, don't you?
why does everyone think I was Benny? I have stressed the no self targetting thing since the beginning so everyone would know that wasn't me.Lena Hyena wrote:BF, that is exactly why I began to buy you could be bad yesterday.
Honestly, I'm amazed you are still alive!
Now I can see what your role is though, and its the role I had fs pegged as. Which is why I no longer think fs must be good. I feel very good about both you and rabbit, and still 99% good about canuck. I think we can now trust that we are down to only one baddie.
FS seems civvie, but I no longer feel I have her absolutely cleared. Her vouch for bea and call for elo to get the rezz votes were both two very civvie things. MP is more of an enigma. I feel like it absolutely must be one of those two, and I'm quite willing to go MP first.
Looking forward to Canuck's case. linki, there is the start of it. And Canuck - thanks for reminding me exactly why I found MP so suspish on day one. I can't wait for 'the Bass lunch' toothats lynch in a New Zealand accent, for anyone who didn't know.
I never said it was fact. I am allowed to speculate based off others speculations which is what I was doing. Blindfaeth presented a possible baddie role, and I am saying how based off that comment you made I can see how this was true. You are trying to negate possible info by saying you did target sophie but it isn't what we think.MovingPictures07 wrote:And I have no idea if the detective is dead, but I was trying to think of every possibility that there could be a sudden turnaround on me and it's one possibility I considered. Why are you trying to pass everything I just said as fact, splints, when I clearly indicated it was speculation?