Murder, Mayhem, and Mafia
https://www.mafiathesyndicate.com/
Awesome. I've been making "smash point" bets (that are obviously fake) all the time with Daisy IRL; it's driving her nuts. :PMetalmarsh89 wrote:So just waiting on rabbit and Long Con to vote.
2 smash coins says each of them votes for the other.
I was even 50% correct.MovingPictures07 wrote:Awesome. I've been making "smash point" bets (that are obviously fake) all the time with Daisy IRL; it's driving her nuts. :PMetalmarsh89 wrote:So just waiting on rabbit and Long Con to vote.
2 smash coins says each of them votes for the other.
Sophie. sorry, I was so sure this was your baddie gameI don't care. From now on, you have joined the ranks of the self-voters, regardless of your phone.S~V~S wrote:THAT is a surprise, tbh, I meant to vote for Sophie, and voted myself by mistake, big fat fingers, little phone screen.
I still don't think it means DP is bad, though. Just that the baddies were howling with Glee in their chatroom. I also had a different person in mind for that role. So that is a double surprise.
S~V~S wrote:THAT is a surprise, tbh, I meant to vote for Sophie, and voted myself by mistake, big fat fingers, little phone screen.
I still don't think it means DP is bad, though. Just that the baddies were howling with Glee in their chatroom. I also had a different person in mind for that role. So that is a double surprise.
We were right next to each other in the poll.Black Rock wrote:S~V~S wrote:THAT is a surprise, tbh, I meant to vote for Sophie, and voted myself by mistake, big fat fingers, little phone screen.
I still don't think it means DP is bad, though. Just that the baddies were howling with Glee in their chatroom. I also had a different person in mind for that role. So that is a double surprise.
I was waiting to see you talk to ask you what that was. I voted the wrong person in a game recently. Not myself though. :P
RIP Sophie.
I did that once before, I was terrified of a lynch switch the rest of the day 
Sounds good.Metalmarsh89 wrote:I still think we should head over to State St.
Hey friendGolden wrote:Sophie, come join me in the deadie lounge
Think carefully TH, about what you're saying. Examine the facts of the lynch, my vote, my timing.Turnip Head wrote:But you didn't give a reason for voting when you voted for Zomba. When you voted for DP last night, you said you might have a busy day the next day and you wanted to make sure you voted. When you voted for Zomba early, you just said "I voted". And then after someone called you out on the possibility of you voting a teammate first, you responded with:Dom wrote:How?Turnip Head wrote:[snipped]
I just thought it was interesting.
That wasn't the reason for my early vote-- you are conflating two unrelated topics. That's a reason why my vote isn't suspicious, not why I voted early.
You know the difference.Your Day 3 early vote lacked a complimentary RL explanation for its earliness, but that's okay, you didn't need it because Zomba was going to flip bad, and you could say afterwards that you wouldn't have started the voting on a teammate that early in the lynch. This all leads me to believe that your early vote for Zomba was a calculated move, drawn up to arrive at this exact defensive strategy.Dom wrote:Also-- starting the vote on someone on your own team that early in the day?
Now you are going after DP for voting Vomps late; you are harping on the importance of vote timing, but you won't acknowledge that Zomba's teammates might have thrown her under the bus yesterday. You think it's more likely that they tried to save her, that DP specifically tried to save her. I've pointed out that Zomba didn't even vote to save herself. Why would DP put his neck on the line to try and save her, when he didn't even place the tying vote? Epi later came in and tied the vote - I don't see you going after Epi at all Dom - and it STILL wasn't enough to save Zomba.
If Zomba didn't vote to save herself, judging by her behavior yesterday, I think there's a good chance that her teammates gave up on her early. Which brings me right back to Dom's vote for Zomba.
That's a nice theory, but a wrong one nonetheless.Turnip Head wrote:Dom said he isn't looking at DP because of what the paper said, he said he's looking at DP solely because of his vote. But Dom is not suspecting, and voting for, the other late Vomps voters. Epi voted Vomps to tie the lynch, and Dom is not looking at Epi. Dom is lying. The item thing must be playing into his vote, even if he doesn't want to say it is.
I think Dom is trying to play off of what the paper says about DP, in that he wants other people to join him in voting for DP because of the item thing, but Dom doesn't want that to be his reason.
how do you not see how hypocritical you're being?Turnip Head wrote:Because I suspect Dom for things he has said and done, and I don't suspect DP for what he's said and done. I don't know how to make it any simpler than that.
For the same reason you're suspicious of me, right?Turnip Head wrote:Exactly. I can draw no conclusions from DP because he rarely talks. He always votes late. I don't know why he would vote so obviously if he were a baddie with Zomba, when it seems to me that Zomba's team gave up on her. So I'm not sure why I'm supposed to be suspicious of him.
Yup, you're right. I came out against my teammate almost immediately on Day 3 when there was no consensus at all against them.Epignosis wrote:Grades were due today (and the system was down Friday), so I've only read along. Home now.
Dom asked this of MM:
The next time Dom directly references Zomb, it's here.Metalmarsh89 wrote:Zomba. If Zomba is civ, I doubt that SVS is a baddie. But the inverse is far more likely.Dom wrote:*cut for brevity*Metalmarsh89 wrote:Here is something that caught my eye today. First we have blindfaeth's original revelation that regarding the will.
Now this post doesn't match up with blindfaeth's statement. blindfaeth suggested he would inherit "a large sum of money". SVS stated that she would inherit "everything she has". SVS then confirmed that the "everything" meant items.
If SVS is on Zomba's team, this is a perfect result. SVS now has the will, and can manipulate its content to the rest of us if she wants.
If SVS is a civvie, I feel that events would have unfolded differently. Would she have voted for an "infodropper" early and before everyone else?
would you advocate a zombi or an svs lynch first them?
Linki @TH: I find your comments this evening to be less than useful, amid some bountiful discussion.
Linki @rabbit: Agreed. Better to get the thoughts out than to take them to your grave.
Now I've said multiple times before that in a two-Mafia setup, there is no civilian credit (people are welcome to continue to argue with me about that, but I'm right). But in a one-Mafia setup (such as this one), there is an advantage to making it look like you sniffed out one of your teammates.
The thing is, there was no sniffing.
Dom wrote:I think Zombs is bad.Dom wrote:I think we should vote Zomba fwiw.That's everything Dom had to say about Zombarella on Day 3. No case, no push- just an early vote and three sentences that say the same thing. That's getting out of the way of the shit before it hits the fan, I say.Dom wrote:And I truly believe Zombi is bad bad news.
What do we do with politicians?
We vote for them.
I hope, after reevaluation, you can see a way my behavior makes sense.Turnip Head wrote:I understand your perspective, Dom. These are good things to talk about tomorrow. I will attempt to explain my perspective further and, as always, reevaluate what I'm seeing.
This post feels very accusatory to no one in particular.LizKeen wrote:I feel like the Celestials and the mafia are voting the same people. I can see why the mafia would do it but is there some reasoning the Celestials would do it? Either that or there's some recruited folk.
Dom wrote: how do you not see how hypocritical you're being?
You have equivocated (falsely, in my opinion) reason to vote me and reason to vote DP.
Then you say there's no reason to suspect DP, but there IS reason to suspect me. However you have EQUIVOCATED the two.
That makes zero sense.
Dammit, Epi! Beat me to it whie I tried to figure out the damn Youtube tags.Epignosis wrote:Equivocate is an intransitive verb meaning "to use ambiguous language to conceal the truth or avoid committing oneself."
Canucklehead wrote:Dammit, Epi! Beat me to it whie I tried to figure out the damn Youtube tags.Epignosis wrote:Equivocate is an intransitive verb meaning "to use ambiguous language to conceal the truth or avoid committing oneself."
And Dom is saying that TH is drawing a similarity between his reasons to vote Dom and his reasons to vote DP. What is the word he meant to use?Epignosis wrote:Equivocate is an intransitive verb meaning "to use ambiguous language to conceal the truth or avoid committing oneself."
Equate.Long Con wrote:And Dom is saying that TH is drawing a similarity between his reasons to vote Dom and his reasons to vote DP. What is the word he meant to use?Epignosis wrote:Equivocate is an intransitive verb meaning "to use ambiguous language to conceal the truth or avoid committing oneself."
Not everyone here is attending Duke.Canucklehead wrote:From our friends at the OED
Ah, shit. Is it behind a login wall? Sorry.Epignosis wrote:Not everyone here is attending Duke.Canucklehead wrote:From our friends at the OED
What would we have seen? OR... give us the Login!Canucklehead wrote:Ah, shit. Is it behind a login wall? Sorry.Epignosis wrote:Not everyone here is attending Duke.Canucklehead wrote:From our friends at the OED
fingersplints wrote:You guys must hate my posts. I misuse all the words!
Why would either team all vote the same people? That would make it too obvious who they all are. I've never been on a team where all members consciously chose to vote together, in fact it's usually the exact opposite. That's not even getting into how dumb the Celestials would be to work with the baddies. I can see them putting their own team first, it's what I'd do, but they literally can't win with the baddies and are basically an extension of the civs.LizKeen wrote:I feel like the Celestials and the mafia are voting the same people. I can see why the mafia would do it but is there some reasoning the Celestials would do it? Either that or there's some recruited folk.
