The Syndicate

Hey everyone, sorry I was out for most of the day, unexoected travels came up. I'll try my best to catch up and vote within the hour. Yeah, I'm doing this.

Matt wrote:

sig wrote:Soneji If you think Golden is so scummy that you vote for him why not vote to save me? the player he is pushing you're basically throwing away your vote.

@Matt Explain your lynch?

linki: Well that sucks you'll need to save me instead.

I think Marmot is a bad Marmot. And going through his ISO, I saw you and him were agreeing on some things. Doesn't give me a good vibe.

Also, Long Con is a Golden light green read and his train was picking up steam, and I trust Golden.

lol I agree with a player who might possibly be bad I must be bad. Suuuure, and why do you trust Golden and your also then saying Golden is never wrong? You trust Golden's read enough that you think LC is civ? Even with his suspicious vote. ooookay

linki: Serge here is a hint vote LC don't join the near sighted wagon on me.

Near-sighted is an understatement.

I think Golden looks the scummiest from my limited reading so far Sig. I haven't looked at the current landscape to know who all is on the chopping block and whether or not I think they deserve to be there. Due to there being a thing called bussing, Golden voting you currently isn't reason enough for me to believe you innocent, over others who have more to work off of.

Thanks DDL. Just been accessing this thread through the day 1 start PM, so no wonder I missed it.

I'm down to switch it up to Marmot if you think you can get the votes together, sig. But I will be leaving for work before the lynch, in about 45 min so make it happen, cap'n.

Is it possible to hear what the cases are for sig, Nerolunar and Long Con?

Matt wrote:I'm down to switch it up to Marmot if you think you can get the votes together, sig. But I will be leaving for work before the lynch, in about 45 min so make it happen, cap'n.

Why not Long Con? He's the baddest of the badder of the bad.

Argh, gotta get to band practice. Voting Golden to preserve Enrique's thrust and because I don't have an immediate reason not to.

7
Scotty (5), ika (6), Dragon D. Luffy (8), Golden (9), indiglo (10), Sloonei (17), Matt (24)
So Ika is a revenge vote, DDL is a No U, Golden is mega tunnely, Sloonei is another No U, and Matt is voting since he thinks MM is bad and that means since we agreed we must be teammates. lolz

So four of the people voting for me I suspected and had doubts about. So basically my wagon is filled with NO U people.


So your voting for Golden in a vote which will do nothing at all this phase but instead voting for the person your top suspect pushed? explain that to me.

Matt your insane why should I even consider helping you switch to MM which won't happen since there is no case on him when you have a vote on me. IN FACT YOU WANT MY HELP TO DO SO??? SO you want a player you think is scum to convince players to vote for someone you think is scum yet we are both scum?

Serge wrote:Is it possible to hear what the cases are for sig, Nerolunar and Long Con?

Yes, anything is possible. You just gotta believe in yourself.

Like for real Golden voters it is a waste of a vote.

a2thezebra wrote:

Serge wrote:Is it possible to hear what the cases are for sig, Nerolunar and Long Con?

Yes, anything is possible. You just gotta believe in yourself.

I do believe in myself but I don't want to believe I can make a sane judgement in less than an hour

Serge wrote:Is it possible to hear what the cases are for sig, Nerolunar and Long Con?

I defended agaisnt the CFD last night and I defended Fuzz who I believe was a civ and that the CFD was b eing used to save a scum which is what usually happens.


Long Con has been extremely inactive and literally seconds before yesterday's poll closed he tied Fuzz to ika. The difference between me and him is that I was active and involved and had been defending players since day 1 such as Gleam. LC committed the most fly by team save attempt I've ever seen.

No idea on Nero

sig wrote:Like for real Golden voters it is a waste of a vote.

a2thezebra wrote:

Matt wrote:I'm down to switch it up to Marmot if you think you can get the votes together, sig. But I will be leaving for work before the lynch, in about 45 min so make it happen, cap'n.

Why not Long Con? He's the baddest of the badder of the bad.

I trust Golden. Doesn't mean he's right, but if he thinks LC is good for now, so do I.

Why not Marmot?

Linki - Lol @ sig. I dunno, Zebra's strong defense of you is making me question your lynch again. I think we should all vote Marmot tbh.

@BOOMSLANG HI, so Enrique thought I was civ, and Golden was bad yes. HOWEVER, the Golden lynch won't happen it would make sense to vote LC the top player golden is defending and in voting LC saving me the player golden is trying to lynch. If Golden is bad as you think there is no way I'm his teammate.

sig wrote:Like for real Golden voters it is a waste of a vote.

Its not a waste when I have no educated reason to vote you, LC or Nero. LC at least from my skim seemed to be a logically minded player who can contribute quite well. Voting to off him just due to your plea for survival isn't an appealing prospect.

Matt wrote:I'm gonna flip the script and vote sig.

Lulz.

da fuq

a2thezebra wrote:

sig wrote:Like for real Golden voters it is a waste of a vote.

lol and then his I vetoed more thing then any other governor then all combined! Someone missed the message they weren't supposed to be veto crazy.

Matt wrote: Why not Marmot?

Because he's civ.

Soneji wrote:

sig wrote:Like for real Golden voters it is a waste of a vote.

Its not a waste when I have no educated reason to vote you, LC or Nero. LC at least from my skim seemed to be a logically minded player who can contribute quite well. Voting to off him just due to your plea for survival isn't an appealing prospect.

This is why a libertarian will never be elected.

sig wrote:

Serge wrote:Is it possible to hear what the cases are for sig, Nerolunar and Long Con?

I defended agaisnt the CFD last night and I defended Fuzz who I believe was a civ and that the CFD was b eing used to save a scum which is what usually happens.


Long Con has been extremely inactive and literally seconds before yesterday's poll closed he tied Fuzz to ika. The difference between me and him is that I was active and involved and had been defending players since day 1 such as Gleam. LC committed the most fly by team save attempt I've ever seen.

No idea on Nero

I've seen your other other NO U post, what is a NO U?

lol @ sig actually watching that video.

I'm voting Nerolunar.

Your move Matt.

NO U is when you vote for someone since they accused you of being mafia.


I thought it was going to be like a song making fun of him not just a speech.

Turnip Head wrote:

Matt wrote:I'm gonna flip the script and vote sig.

Lulz.

da fuq

What? I thought I'd pull a Fuzz and do what I said I wouldn't do before. Anywho, what are your thoughts on MM?

Linki x 7,000

Metalmarsh89 wrote:I'm voting Nerolunar.

Your move Matt.

No no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no.

Whoever got that loan shark votes should defiantly save me. If you don't it will hurt the civ's like alot.

My thoughts on MM are what the hell are you doing Matt?

Zebra I'd be a hypocrite if I didn't address you with the same concerns that I addressed in Scotty's case. Your really minimalist game style is... I don't know if I would say pinging me, but it worries me how little of a read I can get on you.

Metalmarsh89 wrote:I'm voting Nerolunar.

Your move Matt.

I dun get it.

Linki - Lol. Just havin' fun before work Turnips.

agleaminranks wrote:Zebra I'd be a hypocrite if I didn't address you with the same concerns that I addressed in Scotty's case. Your really minimalist game style is... I don't know if I would say pinging me, but it worries me how little of a read I can get on you.

Excellent, that's the idea.

Lets all switch to Nero I mean he has rolled mafia 2 out of 2 games good odds. :P

Matt wrote:

Matt wrote:Marmot, how did you know I misunderstood Golden and that Golden just wasn't bad and lying through his teeth?

Metalmarsh89 wrote:Golden, you said you "completely agree". What do you think those two words together mean?

I don't blame Matt for misunderstanding you. Your statement wasn't a direct representation of your view.

And @ Matt, with regards to Golden. I read his posts around the time of this post you are wondering about. He said one thing but later said he meant another. What are you looking for here?

If people can read me, they can (and will) misread me. If they can misread me, they can mislynch me.

If they can't read me at all, happy days await the town cause.

Sig I'm reading you as a civ. But truth be told I haven't read enough into the cases against you or the other candidates enough. I'm really exhausted trying to mentally manage all the different roles and accusations in this game

sig wrote:Lets all switch to Nero I mean he has rolled mafia 2 out of 2 games good odds. :P

You're civ, stop making yourself look bad.

y u alwayz do dizz

Metalmarsh89 wrote:

Matt wrote:

Matt wrote:Marmot, how did you know I misunderstood Golden and that Golden just wasn't bad and lying through his teeth?

Metalmarsh89 wrote:Golden, you said you "completely agree". What do you think those two words together mean?

I don't blame Matt for misunderstanding you. Your statement wasn't a direct representation of your view.

And @ Matt, with regards to Golden. I read his posts around the time of this post you are wondering about. He said one thing but later said he meant another. What are you looking for here?

What'd you mean with your switch to Nero and "Your move Matt" ?

Derp

a2thezebra wrote:

sig wrote:Like for real Golden voters it is a waste of a vote.

Hey, that's the guy I voted for last time.

a2thezebra wrote:

agleaminranks wrote:Zebra I'd be a hypocrite if I didn't address you with the same concerns that I addressed in Scotty's case. Your really minimalist game style is... I don't know if I would say pinging me, but it worries me how little of a read I can get on you.

Excellent, that's the idea.

So you want to be difficult to read? If you were a civilian, how would this help your case?

agleaminranks wrote:

a2thezebra wrote:

agleaminranks wrote:Zebra I'd be a hypocrite if I didn't address you with the same concerns that I addressed in Scotty's case. Your really minimalist game style is... I don't know if I would say pinging me, but it worries me how little of a read I can get on you.

Excellent, that's the idea.

So you want to be difficult to read? If you were a civilian, how would this help your case?

What case? The answer is in the post you're responding to right here.

If I was mafia there would be more movement to not lynch me right know. Gleam if you think I'm civ then vote to save me.

linki: Zebra if you want to yell at me do it in our mafia team chat pls.

:P

Matt wrote:

Metalmarsh89 wrote:

Matt wrote:

Matt wrote:Marmot, how did you know I misunderstood Golden and that Golden just wasn't bad and lying through his teeth?

Metalmarsh89 wrote:Golden, you said you "completely agree". What do you think those two words together mean?

I don't blame Matt for misunderstanding you. Your statement wasn't a direct representation of your view.

And @ Matt, with regards to Golden. I read his posts around the time of this post you are wondering about. He said one thing but later said he meant another. What are you looking for here?

What'd you mean with your switch to Nero and "Your move Matt" ?

Derp

That's for me to know and you to figure out.

Kinda like how you voted for sig today.

Kinda like how you voted for me today.

Kinda like how you decided on a whim that Golden was civ.

sig wrote:If I was mafia there would be more movement to not lynch me right know. Gleam if you think I'm civ then vote to save me.

linki: Zebra if you want to yell at me do it in our mafia team chat pls.

:P

sorrrrryyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy

a2thezebra wrote:

agleaminranks wrote:

a2thezebra wrote:

agleaminranks wrote:Zebra I'd be a hypocrite if I didn't address you with the same concerns that I addressed in Scotty's case. Your really minimalist game style is... I don't know if I would say pinging me, but it worries me how little of a read I can get on you.

Excellent, that's the idea.

So you want to be difficult to read? If you were a civilian, how would this help your case?

What case? The answer is in the post you're responding to right here.

Why should I vote for Long Con and not for Nerolunar?

Notice the people on my wagon aren't even here? This is so those who are scum can keep their vote on me in case of a CFD. If they where so confident why not log on to make sure it is working? They were able to post enough to preform a CFD and convince people to do it.

MM, what are your thoughts on the mischievous dastardly Long Con?

linki - AHA! What a coincidence. The answer is that Nerolunar is good. We've seen bad Nerolunar before, this isn't that. This is bad Long Con.

a2thezebra wrote:He's a cool guy, huh Epi. I'm nowhere near a libertarian but I would have voted for him if I was of age at the time.

He is. That year I really wanted Ron Paul though. I will never forget that Ron Paul got booed at a Republican debate for quoting the golden rule.

sig wrote:If I was mafia there would be more movement to not lynch me right know. Gleam if you think I'm civ then vote to save me.

linki: Zebra if you want to yell at me do it in our mafia team chat pls.

:P

I just made a move to not lynch you.

Linki: sig, there's also the possibility that people just have other things to do and can't always be online for a last-second vote change.