Re: Romance of the Three Kingdoms [Day 13]
Posted: Sat Sep 24, 2016 1:02 pm
Were a premature gale to thrust me to a decision in the present, my votes would fall upon leetic and Macdougall.
Murder, Mayhem, and Mafia
https://www.mafiathesyndicate.com/
OMGUS from the orient.Zuo Ci wrote:I would see MacDougall destroyed. The scent of the Nanman is strengthened. To slaughter those who speak is an evil to be attributed to this one. It is his way. Those who threaten the Nanman are killed by the Nanman. MacDougall does not suffer threats. His vote for the doctor on the first day is not meaningful. He resisted the destruction of the rodent spirit animal based upon his concern about the doctor's manipulation. It was transparent.
This spirit stood against you before you stood against this spirit. Your attempted placing of a yellow turban upon this spirit's head has been rebuked soundly. You are to be destroyed.MacDougall wrote:OMGUS from the orient.Zuo Ci wrote:I would see MacDougall destroyed. The scent of the Nanman is strengthened. To slaughter those who speak is an evil to be attributed to this one. It is his way. Those who threaten the Nanman are killed by the Nanman. MacDougall does not suffer threats. His vote for the doctor on the first day is not meaningful. He resisted the destruction of the rodent spirit animal based upon his concern about the doctor's manipulation. It was transparent.
I am to be destroyed because I made a case against you? That's not in the spirit of the game.Zuo Ci wrote:This spirit stood against you before you stood against this spirit. Your attempted placing of a yellow turban upon this spirit's head has been rebuked soundly. You are to be destroyed.MacDougall wrote:OMGUS from the orient.Zuo Ci wrote:I would see MacDougall destroyed. The scent of the Nanman is strengthened. To slaughter those who speak is an evil to be attributed to this one. It is his way. Those who threaten the Nanman are killed by the Nanman. MacDougall does not suffer threats. His vote for the doctor on the first day is not meaningful. He resisted the destruction of the rodent spirit animal based upon his concern about the doctor's manipulation. It was transparent.
I am not an indy and I too was silenced so if apparently repetitive silencings are enough for Scotty to be Captain Townman then I should be too.DFaraday wrote:I did a reread over Dom and Boomslang and reviewed their votes (all of the above, incidentally, is extremely tedious and time-consuming; it's one of the reasons I don't like case building, along with not wanting to die). Anyway, I feel alright about Dom, but if I had to guess a baddie alignment, I'd say Nanman; he makes very little mention of any of the Nanman and didn't vote for any of them as far as I can see; he did briefly suspect MP and voted Daisy, so I think it's less likely he's YT. But either way, I don't have a strong suspicion of Dom.
As for Boom, I slightly amend my earlier statement regarding him and Mac; I'd slightly prefer voting Mac. Upon review, I noticed that Boom voted MM on Day 1 as well as Day 2, and was the first to vote INH on his lynch. That does it a bit less likely that he's Nanman.
I still believe that Mac isn't a baddie per se, but rereading his exchanges with Dom and others really struck me by his wording. He framed the case against him only within the terms of him being on a baddie team, specifically referred to himself as "non-mafia aligned", and seemed particularly interested in Lu Bu. I'm thinking Mac is indy, and as far as I can tell, all of the Indies are or can be bad news.
My list as it stands (before analyzing Quin, Indiglo, Mata, Bass, Scotty, and Ninja):
Scotty (pretty heavily anti-Nanman at least, seems legit)
Quin
Indi
Mata
Bass
Dom
Boom
Bullz
leetic
Simon
Aragorn
Mac (as an Indy)
Ninja (I still think she's bad news)
You are to be destroyed because of your Nanman scent. You are to be destroyed because you pretended I declared to the gods that you suck, or that such a declaration would have meaning.MacDougall wrote:I am to be destroyed because I made a case against you? That's not in the spirit of the game.
Your hiding nonsensical reasoning behind your schtick.Zuo Ci wrote:You are to be destroyed because of your Nanman scent. You are to be destroyed because you pretended I declared to the gods that you suck, or that such a declaration would have meaning.MacDougall wrote:I am to be destroyed because I made a case against you? That's not in the spirit of the game.
There is no nonsense. To call it nonsense does not render it nonsense.MacDougall wrote:Your hiding nonsensical reasoning behind your schtick.
There is no inspiration. This is not to be viewed with favor.MacDougall wrote:I would like to see Wilgy and JaggedJimmyJay in a duel. Who wouldn't?
The smell of fear is palpable.MacDougall wrote:Don't look at me like that. I'm not even here yet. Stop it. I can tell what you're thinking.JaggedJimmyJay wrote:Hi Mac.
There is no inspiration. This is not to be viewed with favor.MacDougall wrote:I don't want to say it, people don't like it...JaggedJimmyJay wrote:By the way, why do you want Wilgy and I to kill each other?
To claim credit where there is no inspiration. This is not to be viewed with favor.MacDougall wrote:Oh look a guy who I voted for on day 1 got lynched and is bad and this time I didn't actually try making a case on him. New strategy.
Wassup Glorfindel with ignoring my comment? You scared there buddy?
The rodent spirit animal was slaughtered because his affiliation with the doctor was visible in nature. To resist his destruction for the reasons stated appears as a disconnect with the truth of the universe. I am inspired to pursue the destruction of he who spoke it. To make a mistake is to be human. This does not appear as a mistake. It appears as a conscious resistance to the destruction of the second Nanman on the second day.MacDougall wrote:I don't feel like Dom is bad, so sending him to fight the Marmot isn't jiving with me.
I don't think Marmot is a good candidate either. I don't like that the case has trace elements of Wilgy wifom in it. Wilgy is a savant of causing wifom to work the way he wants. I feel like he would be expecting Metalmarsh to get suspicion from that post. I also think Metalmarsh is playing the game way too casual considering his situation.
The only person with a vote who I am feeling neg about is Russtifinko. So I will be voting for Russ and trusting my feel on Dunny from Day 1.
Oh yeah? Why?DFaraday wrote:I did a reread over Dom and Boomslang and reviewed their votes (all of the above, incidentally, is extremely tedious and time-consuming; it's one of the reasons I don't like case building, along with not wanting to die). Anyway, I feel alright about Dom, but if I had to guess a baddie alignment, I'd say Nanman; he makes very little mention of any of the Nanman and didn't vote for any of them as far as I can see; he did briefly suspect MP and voted Daisy, so I think it's less likely he's YT. But either way, I don't have a strong suspicion of Dom.
As for Boom, I slightly amend my earlier statement regarding him and Mac; I'd slightly prefer voting Mac. Upon review, I noticed that Boom voted MM on Day 1 as well as Day 2, and was the first to vote INH on his lynch. That does it a bit less likely that he's Nanman.
I still believe that Mac isn't a baddie per se, but rereading his exchanges with Dom and others really struck me by his wording. He framed the case against him only within the terms of him being on a baddie team, specifically referred to himself as "non-mafia aligned", and seemed particularly interested in Lu Bu. I'm thinking Mac is indy, and as far as I can tell, all of the Indies are or can be bad news.
My list as it stands (before analyzing Quin, Indiglo, Mata, Bass, Scotty, and Ninja):
Scotty (pretty heavily anti-Nanman at least, seems legit)
Quin
Indi
Mata
Bass
Dom
Boom
Bullz
leetic
Simon
Aragorn
Mac (as an Indy)
Ninja (I still think she's bad news)
I like this. Mac, say a thing!Zuo Ci wrote:I am called by nature to share my research.
There is no inspiration. This is not to be viewed with favor.MacDougall wrote:I would like to see Wilgy and JaggedJimmyJay in a duel. Who wouldn't?
The smell of fear is palpable.MacDougall wrote:Don't look at me like that. I'm not even here yet. Stop it. I can tell what you're thinking.JaggedJimmyJay wrote:Hi Mac.
There is no inspiration. This is not to be viewed with favor.MacDougall wrote:I don't want to say it, people don't like it...JaggedJimmyJay wrote:By the way, why do you want Wilgy and I to kill each other?
To claim credit where there is no inspiration. This is not to be viewed with favor.MacDougall wrote:Oh look a guy who I voted for on day 1 got lynched and is bad and this time I didn't actually try making a case on him. New strategy.
Wassup Glorfindel with ignoring my comment? You scared there buddy?
The rodent spirit animal was slaughtered because his affiliation with the doctor was visible in nature. To resist his destruction for the reasons stated appears as a disconnect with the truth of the universe. I am inspired to pursue the destruction of he who spoke it. To make a mistake is to be human. This does not appear as a mistake. It appears as a conscious resistance to the destruction of the second Nanman on the second day.MacDougall wrote:I don't feel like Dom is bad, so sending him to fight the Marmot isn't jiving with me.
I don't think Marmot is a good candidate either. I don't like that the case has trace elements of Wilgy wifom in it. Wilgy is a savant of causing wifom to work the way he wants. I feel like he would be expecting Metalmarsh to get suspicion from that post. I also think Metalmarsh is playing the game way too casual considering his situation.
The only person with a vote who I am feeling neg about is Russtifinko. So I will be voting for Russ and trusting my feel on Dunny from Day 1.
Those who the Nanman have murdered are those who have threatened the Nanman. This is the way of MacDougall.
Buuuuuullllllshit.Zuo Ci wrote:I am called by nature to share my research.
There is no inspiration. This is not to be viewed with favor.MacDougall wrote:I would like to see Wilgy and JaggedJimmyJay in a duel. Who wouldn't?
The smell of fear is palpable.MacDougall wrote:Don't look at me like that. I'm not even here yet. Stop it. I can tell what you're thinking.JaggedJimmyJay wrote:Hi Mac.
There is no inspiration. This is not to be viewed with favor.MacDougall wrote:I don't want to say it, people don't like it...JaggedJimmyJay wrote:By the way, why do you want Wilgy and I to kill each other?
To claim credit where there is no inspiration. This is not to be viewed with favor.MacDougall wrote:Oh look a guy who I voted for on day 1 got lynched and is bad and this time I didn't actually try making a case on him. New strategy.
Wassup Glorfindel with ignoring my comment? You scared there buddy?
The rodent spirit animal was slaughtered because his affiliation with the doctor was visible in nature. To resist his destruction for the reasons stated appears as a disconnect with the truth of the universe. I am inspired to pursue the destruction of he who spoke it. To make a mistake is to be human. This does not appear as a mistake. It appears as a conscious resistance to the destruction of the second Nanman on the second day.MacDougall wrote:I don't feel like Dom is bad, so sending him to fight the Marmot isn't jiving with me.
I don't think Marmot is a good candidate either. I don't like that the case has trace elements of Wilgy wifom in it. Wilgy is a savant of causing wifom to work the way he wants. I feel like he would be expecting Metalmarsh to get suspicion from that post. I also think Metalmarsh is playing the game way too casual considering his situation.
The only person with a vote who I am feeling neg about is Russtifinko. So I will be voting for Russ and trusting my feel on Dunny from Day 1.
Those who the Nanman have murdered are those who have threatened the Nanman. This is the way of MacDougall.
You have revealed the purpose for its inclusion, as it is the only one you've discussed in your response. If I may illustrate in the sand...MacDougall wrote:Buuuuuullllllshit.
To throw that joking comment I made in there proves you have an agenda.
You speak like you know met yet if you knew me you would know better than to point at that post and give it any credence at all.
I don't thino any of the dead ever really cast suspicions on me either, so if that is my way why is dom alive?
That's where I'm at too. It isn't (automatically) about what Zou posted regarding Mac, but also in Mac's responses to what Zou has posted.Scotty wrote:Mac is squirming like an arsonist at a match factory, and I think Ci has made a name for himself. I think that this is a gift, and JJJ has been gifted a voice from beyond the grave. I could see either he or Boom as Nanman teammates. I also think one of Bullz and leetic is YT, so I'd be willing to vote there as well.
I will probably vote a combo like our kindred spirit has proposed- one of Mac/boom and one of Bullz/leetic to hit two birds with one shouken.
On the flip side, if you just subbed into Jan and she was YT, it would have been a stupid move to kill last night because we would put 2 and 2 together. So this could be a great time for you to lay low for a while as we attempt to pick off the Nanman.Aragorn wrote:I just got in to the game in the last day phase. Looking at this game objectively, I see absolutely no reason in pursuing inactives in the hope that they're the remaining YT member (or independents, for that matter), when we know that there's a very good possibility he/she was one of the NK's. Our immediate priority is nanman, who is very likely to be some of our active players. YT hasn't killed in a long while, they're probably wiped out. I wouldn't put it passed the Bad guys to use this as a distraction from the real issue at hand.
That is an odd suspicion of me. I'm pretty sure there was another sub before me, wouldn't such a claim be just as likely for that person too?Scotty wrote:On the flip side, if you just subbed into Jan and she was YT, it would have been a stupid move to kill last night because we would put 2 and 2 together. So this could be a great time for you to lay low for a while as we attempt to pick off the Nanman.Aragorn wrote:I just got in to the game in the last day phase. Looking at this game objectively, I see absolutely no reason in pursuing inactives in the hope that they're the remaining YT member (or independents, for that matter), when we know that there's a very good possibility he/she was one of the NK's. Our immediate priority is nanman, who is very likely to be some of our active players. YT hasn't killed in a long while, they're probably wiped out. I wouldn't put it passed the Bad guys to use this as a distraction from the real issue at hand.
All being said, i agree with you, but I'm not going to leave that rock overturned.
It's hardly a conclusion. It's a scenario im putting out there as a possibility. Yes there are others that have subbed in since, but since you popped in to start talking about leaving inactives alone, and that the YT is probably wiped out, I found it noteworthy.Aragorn wrote:That is an odd suspicion of me. I'm pretty sure there was another sub before me, wouldn't such a claim be just as likely for that person too?Scotty wrote:On the flip side, if you just subbed into Jan and she was YT, it would have been a stupid move to kill last night because we would put 2 and 2 together. So this could be a great time for you to lay low for a while as we attempt to pick off the Nanman.Aragorn wrote:I just got in to the game in the last day phase. Looking at this game objectively, I see absolutely no reason in pursuing inactives in the hope that they're the remaining YT member (or independents, for that matter), when we know that there's a very good possibility he/she was one of the NK's. Our immediate priority is nanman, who is very likely to be some of our active players. YT hasn't killed in a long while, they're probably wiped out. I wouldn't put it passed the Bad guys to use this as a distraction from the real issue at hand.
All being said, i agree with you, but I'm not going to leave that rock overturned.
Frankly I don't at all like how you've come to that conclusion.
Fair enough.Scotty wrote:It's hardly a conclusion. It's a scenario im putting out there as a possibility. Yes there are others that have subbed in since, but since you popped in to start talking about leaving inactives alone, and that the YT is probably wiped out, I found it noteworthy.Aragorn wrote:That is an odd suspicion of me. I'm pretty sure there was another sub before me, wouldn't such a claim be just as likely for that person too?Scotty wrote:On the flip side, if you just subbed into Jan and she was YT, it would have been a stupid move to kill last night because we would put 2 and 2 together. So this could be a great time for you to lay low for a while as we attempt to pick off the Nanman.Aragorn wrote:I just got in to the game in the last day phase. Looking at this game objectively, I see absolutely no reason in pursuing inactives in the hope that they're the remaining YT member (or independents, for that matter), when we know that there's a very good possibility he/she was one of the NK's. Our immediate priority is nanman, who is very likely to be some of our active players. YT hasn't killed in a long while, they're probably wiped out. I wouldn't put it passed the Bad guys to use this as a distraction from the real issue at hand.
All being said, i agree with you, but I'm not going to leave that rock overturned.
Frankly I don't at all like how you've come to that conclusion.
Nonetheless I am not currently suspecting you. If kills start trickling in from YT, things might start getting interesting.
I don't personally think this will happen- I'm more confident one of the more active people is the indie leader waiting for the YT to be wiped out or else that guy is one of the inactives. I see no negative consequence from voting the inactives at this point.
nijuukyugou wrote:Oh yeah? Why?DFaraday wrote:I did a reread over Dom and Boomslang and reviewed their votes (all of the above, incidentally, is extremely tedious and time-consuming; it's one of the reasons I don't like case building, along with not wanting to die). Anyway, I feel alright about Dom, but if I had to guess a baddie alignment, I'd say Nanman; he makes very little mention of any of the Nanman and didn't vote for any of them as far as I can see; he did briefly suspect MP and voted Daisy, so I think it's less likely he's YT. But either way, I don't have a strong suspicion of Dom.
As for Boom, I slightly amend my earlier statement regarding him and Mac; I'd slightly prefer voting Mac. Upon review, I noticed that Boom voted MM on Day 1 as well as Day 2, and was the first to vote INH on his lynch. That does it a bit less likely that he's Nanman.
I still believe that Mac isn't a baddie per se, but rereading his exchanges with Dom and others really struck me by his wording. He framed the case against him only within the terms of him being on a baddie team, specifically referred to himself as "non-mafia aligned", and seemed particularly interested in Lu Bu. I'm thinking Mac is indy, and as far as I can tell, all of the Indies are or can be bad news.
My list as it stands (before analyzing Quin, Indiglo, Mata, Bass, Scotty, and Ninja):
Scotty (pretty heavily anti-Nanman at least, seems legit)
Quin
Indi
Mata
Bass
Dom
Boom
Bullz
leetic
Simon
Aragorn
Mac (as an Indy)
Ninja (I still think she's bad news)
I think you could very well be a YT, voting to try to save MP early on, then becoming inactive enough to stop sending in kills. And on the occasions you do post, you make no attempt at contributing or analysis, which is a bad look too.DFaraday wrote: I'm considering a Ninja vote, for purely circumstantial reasons. She voted Russ on the day MP was lynched, explaining that she thought he wanted to duel. Given the timing of the vote, it could be an easy reason to vote the next viable option besides a teammate.
He kept pushing the desire to duel so hard that I have a hard time believing a baddie would invite being up for lynching like that. I don't see anything suspicious in his voting record either.MacDougall wrote:Faraday how do you get a civ read on Bass?
Don't forget to move your arms in a swimming motion. I've always read that about avalanches. Move like you're swimming, and try to keep your head above the snow.Zuo Ci wrote:I am swept into the avalanche.
Nah, I'm just super lazy/busy this game, but I don't miss night actions. But understandable suspicion. Gotta look somewhere we haven't gone. Alas, it is not me.DFaraday wrote:nijuukyugou wrote:Oh yeah? Why?DFaraday wrote:I did a reread over Dom and Boomslang and reviewed their votes (all of the above, incidentally, is extremely tedious and time-consuming; it's one of the reasons I don't like case building, along with not wanting to die). Anyway, I feel alright about Dom, but if I had to guess a baddie alignment, I'd say Nanman; he makes very little mention of any of the Nanman and didn't vote for any of them as far as I can see; he did briefly suspect MP and voted Daisy, so I think it's less likely he's YT. But either way, I don't have a strong suspicion of Dom.
As for Boom, I slightly amend my earlier statement regarding him and Mac; I'd slightly prefer voting Mac. Upon review, I noticed that Boom voted MM on Day 1 as well as Day 2, and was the first to vote INH on his lynch. That does it a bit less likely that he's Nanman.
I still believe that Mac isn't a baddie per se, but rereading his exchanges with Dom and others really struck me by his wording. He framed the case against him only within the terms of him being on a baddie team, specifically referred to himself as "non-mafia aligned", and seemed particularly interested in Lu Bu. I'm thinking Mac is indy, and as far as I can tell, all of the Indies are or can be bad news.
My list as it stands (before analyzing Quin, Indiglo, Mata, Bass, Scotty, and Ninja):
Scotty (pretty heavily anti-Nanman at least, seems legit)
Quin
Indi
Mata
Bass
Dom
Boom
Bullz
leetic
Simon
Aragorn
Mac (as an Indy)
Ninja (I still think she's bad news)I think you could very well be a YT, voting to try to save MP early on, then becoming inactive enough to stop sending in kills. And on the occasions you do post, you make no attempt at contributing or analysis, which is a bad look too.DFaraday wrote: I'm considering a Ninja vote, for purely circumstantial reasons. She voted Russ on the day MP was lynched, explaining that she thought he wanted to duel. Given the timing of the vote, it could be an easy reason to vote the next viable option besides a teammate.
I'm going to go ahead and vote Mac and Ninja.