The Syndicate

But thank you to Canuck for being hilarious.

Epignosis wrote:

Canucklehead wrote:

Epignosis wrote:Equivocate is an intransitive verb meaning "to use ambiguous language to conceal the truth or avoid committing oneself."

Dammit, Epi! Beat me to it whie I tried to figure out the damn Youtube tags.

BTSC?





:P

Dom wrote:But thank you to Canuck for being hilarious.

I hope it was hilarious, and not jerky....that's what I was aiming for, but sometimes I worry that I've been contaminated by all the pompous and humourless asses that populate my department/institution/profession and have lost my ability to tell the difference between "funny" and "dickish". Please feel free to tell me when I get it wrong. I emphatically do NOT want to become one of the annoying pendantic dipshits who roam the halls here and exemplify all the worst qualities of academia (and humanity in general)....

Canucklehead wrote:

Dom wrote:But thank you to Canuck for being hilarious.

I hope it was hilarious, and not jerky....that's what I was aiming for, but sometimes I worry that I've been contaminated by all the pompous and humourless asses that populate my department/institution/profession and have lost my ability to tell the difference between "funny" and "dickish". Please feel free to tell me when I get it wrong. I emphatically do NOT want to become one of the annoying pendantic dipshits who roam the halls here and exemplify all the worst qualities of academia (and humanity in general)....

I love the Princess Bride-- I thought it was quite a humorous and harmless way to point out my mistake!

state st.

Well that didn't turn out like I figured it would at all. RIP Sophie! Sorry for being so wrong.

Elohcin wrote:yeah, I didn't think she was bad. Sorry Sophie.

Why did you vote for her then?

Linki

Heck with it. I'll vote for State St. too.

Canucklehead wrote:

Dom wrote:But thank you to Canuck for being hilarious.

I hope it was hilarious, and not jerky....that's what I was aiming for, but sometimes I worry that I've been contaminated by all the pompous and humourless asses that populate my department/institution/profession and have lost my ability to tell the difference between "funny" and "dickish". Please feel free to tell me when I get it wrong. I emphatically do NOT want to become one of the annoying pendantic dipshits who roam the halls here and exemplify all the worst qualities of academia (and humanity in general)....

Dick jokes are funny though......

juliets wrote:

DFaraday wrote:

juliets wrote:

DFaraday wrote:

Turnip Head wrote:So... who are you thinking of voting for, Faraday?

I'm actually looking at Juliets right now. I feel like she's been rather wishy-washy all game (suspecting then backing off from MP, suggesting voting BF then being talked out of it, not knowing whom to vote for on Day 3). If I can figure out the multi-quoting I'll do that later.

And Sophie is sounding even more sincere in her latest posts to me.

There is a difference between being wishy washy and changing your mind because of discussion. It is not at all against my playstyle to not be decisive about a candidate on one day. I evaluate the evidence and the gut pings that I and others have and sometimes it is hard to decided who to vote. I would bet that almost everyone here has had a hard time deciding who to vote at least once during this game.

I get that, and it's not a hugely damning case in my view, but it's just coming off as a noncommittal game to me. I have to go, so I'll just vote Juliet.

I don't think Sophie or DP are bad, so this lynch isn't going to end well, I fear.

Well if you get what i said, and you've played with me before which you have, you should get that I don't deserve a vote. And you are calling my game non-commital? How would you describe your game?

I'd call my game rather lazy and ill-informed. I know that this is fairly typical for you, it just felt a bit stronger than usual in not being memorable, if that makes sense. If I had actually suspected either DP or Sophie, I would have certainly gone them over you.

Voting Wabash because it sounds funny.

DFaraday wrote:

juliets wrote:

DFaraday wrote:

juliets wrote:

DFaraday wrote:

Turnip Head wrote:So... who are you thinking of voting for, Faraday?

I'm actually looking at Juliets right now. I feel like she's been rather wishy-washy all game (suspecting then backing off from MP, suggesting voting BF then being talked out of it, not knowing whom to vote for on Day 3). If I can figure out the multi-quoting I'll do that later.

And Sophie is sounding even more sincere in her latest posts to me.

There is a difference between being wishy washy and changing your mind because of discussion. It is not at all against my playstyle to not be decisive about a candidate on one day. I evaluate the evidence and the gut pings that I and others have and sometimes it is hard to decided who to vote. I would bet that almost everyone here has had a hard time deciding who to vote at least once during this game.

I get that, and it's not a hugely damning case in my view, but it's just coming off as a noncommittal game to me. I have to go, so I'll just vote Juliet.

I don't think Sophie or DP are bad, so this lynch isn't going to end well, I fear.

Well if you get what i said, and you've played with me before which you have, you should get that I don't deserve a vote. And you are calling my game non-commital? How would you describe your game?

I'd call my game rather lazy and ill-informed. I know that this is fairly typical for you, it just felt a bit stronger than usual in not being memorable, if that makes sense. If I had actually suspected either DP or Sophie, I would have certainly gone them over you.

Voting Wabash because it sounds funny.

Why so lazy and ill-informed? No time for Mafia?

voted

Bass_the_Clever wrote:voted

That means you're bad!

Dom wrote:

Bass_the_Clever wrote:voted

That means you're bad!

Oh no. You better lynch me then. lol

Bass_the_Clever wrote:

Dom wrote:

Bass_the_Clever wrote:voted

That means you're bad!

Oh no. You better lynch me then. lol

Why didn't you give a reason!?

Dom wrote:

Bass_the_Clever wrote:

Dom wrote:

Bass_the_Clever wrote:voted

That means you're bad!

Oh no. You better lynch me then. lol

Why didn't you give a reason!?

Because I'm not really sure what this whole street thing is.

So I really just pick one. ast time I picked archer because that show cracks me up.

bAd

Dom since you changed your play style this game does that make you bad?

Bass_the_Clever wrote:Dom since you changed your play style this game does that make you bad?

I changed my play style?

Dom wrote:

Bass_the_Clever wrote:Dom since you changed your play style this game does that make you bad?

I changed my play style?

Since I have replaced MP it has seemed that way I dont know how you were playing before I replaced in but to me it seemed like you were trying something new.

You have been more quiet this game.

Bass_the_Clever wrote:You have been more quiet this game.

I have 103 posts in this game. This is post #104.
In all 12 days of Doctor Who Mafia I posted 407 times.


??

Dom wrote:

Bass_the_Clever wrote:You have been more quiet this game.

I have 103 posts in this game. This is post #104.
In all 12 days of Doctor Who Mafia I posted 407 times.


??

You were pretty quick with that information.

Dom wrote:

Bass_the_Clever wrote:You have been more quiet this game.

I have 103 posts in this game. This is post #104.
In all 12 days of Doctor Who Mafia I posted 407 times.


??

Idk man I guess nothing that you were say stuck out to me. I guess I should go look back at your post and see why that is.

Long Con wrote:

Dom wrote:

Bass_the_Clever wrote:You have been more quiet this game.

I have 103 posts in this game. This is post #104.
In all 12 days of Doctor Who Mafia I posted 407 times.


??

You were pretty quick with that information.

It took about 90 seconds to look up.

HA...voted State Street without even looking at the results first. Looks like the popular vote. Today has been so crazy hectic. I am still working atm and I am going to try to get in a quick workout while my cakes bake. Then off to band practice and it isn't even Thursday!! I need my life to slow down a bit!

Dom wrote:

Long Con wrote:

Dom wrote:

Bass_the_Clever wrote:You have been more quiet this game.

I have 103 posts in this game. This is post #104.
In all 12 days of Doctor Who Mafia I posted 407 times.


??

You were pretty quick with that information.

It took about 90 seconds to look up.

Yeah, pretty quick! *high five begins*

State I guess.

Sorry for the delay, folks. I have to send a few PMs and then the Night post will be up momentarily.

RIP DisPor

Where to, Slim?

Poll ended at Tue Mar 31, 2015 6:56:28 pm

Archer Ave.
0
No votes

Clark St.
3
fingersplints (2), S~V~S (6), Epignosis (9)
14%

Dearborn St.
0
No votes

Randolph St.
4
Black Rock (4), LizKeen (10), Canucklehead (14), Bullzeye (15)
18%

State St.
10
Metalmarsh89 (5), Long Con (7), rabbit8 (8), Dom (12), Turnip Head (13), juliets (16), birdwithteeth11 (17), Bass_the_Clever (19), Elohcin (20), DisgruntledPorcupine (22)
45%

Wabash Ave.
1
DFaraday (18)
5%

22nd St.
1
Vompatti (3)
5%

Somewhere that’s green (Host/Mod/Dead/NP)
3
thellama73 (1), Made (11), Golden (21)
14%


Total votes : 22

RIP DP. I really thought you were the Beast.

Why?

RIP DP.

Yeah, that doesn't make any sense from the baddie team's perspective. If he wasn't one of them, and given he was a prime suspect, I'm not sure why they NKed him.

Unless it's to completely throw us off their trail as to who they could be.

What is this silly talk? DP was killed because of the target on his back. And there's more targets out there by my estimation. I hope I'm wrong.

Nice poem, poet role! I know some of you will think I wrote that, but I didn't. If I were the poet, there would have been more poems. Unless it's an awesome and diabolical play by me to throw you off the trail...

RIP DP. I don't know what to make of the section of the newspaper about the fraud. Does anyone understand what it's trying to say?

RIP DP

I don't know what its trying to say either Black Rock.

I don't know about the will either. But until I know the source of all those notes in the paper, I'm not sure if it's worth believing any of them.

Just there was one will right? That will was not the will of Gilrick because it had Zombarellas name on it and SVS had it and I don't think she is the blond beast.

I assume this information was because State St. won the poll. So this is game info from the host. I believe this to be true so I trust it. I just don't understand it.

Oh! Unless it's telling us that the other newspapers report about the will was false, which we already knew.

I think that it was confirming that it was false.

That makes sense.

RIP DP

S~V~S wrote:Why?

Because I couldn't get past that he had the elephant charm and I didn't understand why anyone would want to steal that item.

S~V~S wrote:I think that it was confirming that it was false.

That's the only thing I can think. I guess I'm over-thinking this too much.

Epignosis wrote:Pgnss thnks Glrck trgtd smn t gv hs wll t. Th prsn h trgtd ws th Blnd Bst, Crl vn Trsslr.

*rl chck*

f Pgnss s rght, ppl shld lk fr sddn cs md gnst smn.

Epignosis thinks Gilrick targeted someone to give his will to. The person he targeted was the Blond Beast, Carl Von Tressler.

*role check*

If Epignosis is right, people should look for a sudden case made against someone.

So Epig, what was up with this post? Now that we know the will was a fake by the baddies... I don't knwo, something about using the Smiley there seems to imply that you know something. Maybe that's not the way everyone reads it, but that's the way I read it.

What your post here did was give everyone another option to consider that was very different from the first conclusion: that the Will was faked to give Zomba credit after S~V~S was killed. I'm sure it's nothing, but it really seems to me like you were trying to save Zomba, in a way.

I had forgotten about that. I was hoping at the time that Epi would explain his train of thought better when able to talk again. At one point, he said "creative Host (- the vowels). How would he know that? What would even lead him to speculate down that path? Of all the random things that a story could be, that it was an in thread role check?

I need to do some rereading.

RIP DP.