The Syndicate

MovingPictures07 wrote:Since when did people start thinking it's OK to tell your fellow players to "fuck off" (GoC), "shut the fuck up" (here), or calling people names? I just saw Enrique call Matt "dipshit". Seriously, guys, I know I'm not the MoD, but I am the admin of this site, and I'm severely disappointed how recent games we've seemingly become more and more OK with being crass to each other.

MovingPictures07 wrote:Since when did people start thinking it's OK to tell your fellow players to "fuck off" (GoC), "shut the fuck up" (here), or calling people names? I just saw Enrique call Matt "dipshit". Seriously, guys, I know I'm not the MoD, but I am the admin of this site, and I'm severely disappointed how recent games we've seemingly become more and more OK with being crass to each other.

MacDougall wrote:

MovingPictures07 wrote:Since when did people start thinking it's OK to tell your fellow players to "fuck off" (GoC), "shut the fuck up" (here), or calling people names? I just saw Enrique call Matt "dipshit". Seriously, guys, I know I'm not the MoD, but I am the admin of this site, and I'm severely disappointed how recent games we've seemingly become more and more OK with being crass to each other.

How bout those physical threats tho.

MovingPictures07 wrote:Since when did people start thinking it's OK to tell your fellow players to "fuck off" (GoC), "shut the fuck up" (here), or calling people names? I just saw Enrique call Matt "dipshit". Seriously, guys, I know I'm not the MoD, but I am the admin of this site, and I'm severely disappointed how recent games we've seemingly become more and more OK with being crass to each other.

sig wrote:I see your not going to be more specific nice to know, you've 180 and are know trying to get me lynched. How about this then Enrique build a case on me or Nero? Instead of giving some vague reasoning. I don't believe you at all if you have something then share it especially after spending all phase trying to get Matt lynched. Also views on MP please.

Turnip Head wrote:

Enrique wrote:I feel like a giant asshole right now
and this is gonna hurt me a lot but it's kinda important
I highly encourage a sig or nerolunar lynch today. NOT MATT.


ffffffff

Don't let his lead get wider. I was wrong.

i cant believe im doing this im so so sorry and would understand if this got me lynched, but i gotta at least try.

Epignosis/LC you are cruel cruel people.

Why do we fall, Enrique?

MovingPictures07 wrote:I see more discussion has occurred regarding the Wilgy as Robin and Scotty theory, but I'm not going to repeat myself until I'm blue in the sockface again (see, my avatar is blue now!). I still think my theory has merit, at least as a theory.

And Enrique, sorry, I'm not trying to call you out or anything. You're definitely not the only one, far from it, that I saw using crass language. I just was making a general statement, and I don't even mean to bring down the thread; rather, I just think this is a good call that, although this is a game of deception, we should try to be as respectful to each other as we can.

DharmaHelper wrote:Lets lynch Nero.

DharmaHelper wrote:Lets lynch Nero.

sig wrote:

MovingPictures07 wrote:I see more discussion has occurred regarding the Wilgy as Robin and Scotty theory, but I'm not going to repeat myself until I'm blue in the sockface again (see, my avatar is blue now!). I still think my theory has merit, at least as a theory.

And Enrique, sorry, I'm not trying to call you out or anything. You're definitely not the only one, far from it, that I saw using crass language. I just was making a general statement, and I don't even mean to bring down the thread; rather, I just think this is a good call that, although this is a game of deception, we should try to be as respectful to each other as we can.

Shameless game promotion right here smh MP. :P

Also watched more of Breaking bad season 2 is better.

Glad to hear it.

a2thezebra wrote:

Turnip Head wrote:

Enrique wrote:I feel like a giant asshole right now
and this is gonna hurt me a lot but it's kinda important
I highly encourage a sig or nerolunar lynch today. NOT MATT.


ffffffff

Don't let his lead get wider. I was wrong.

i cant believe im doing this im so so sorry and would understand if this got me lynched, but i gotta at least try.

Epignosis/LC you are cruel cruel people.

Why do we fall, Enrique?

That's it, consider yourself added to my list of top suspects.

DharmaHelper wrote:Why? Because I don't want to lynch Matt right now and Nero has a couple of votes.

MacDougall wrote:Let's not just lynch a guy based on a player saying let's lynch them. Let's decide on who the best candidate is.

I tactically stopped attacking my suspects from Day 1 today and it revealed some interesting stuff. Under the microscope Turnip Head contributed plenty of discussion. As soon as I took the microscope away his contribution to discussion screeched to a grinding halt. Why?

MacDougall wrote:Let's not just lynch a guy based on a player saying let's lynch them. Let's decide on who the best candidate is.

I tactically stopped attacking my suspects from Day 1 today and it revealed some interesting stuff. Under the microscope Turnip Head contributed plenty of discussion. As soon as I took the microscope away his contribution to discussion screeched to a grinding halt. Why?

Golden wrote:This is insane. I don't know if something like Enrique's recent posting is genuine or forced, and it makes me paranoid either way.

I'm barely going to be around before deadline and definitely don't have time to keep up with all of the developments. I feel that it's kind of ironic that I'm in a position where I'm picking between Matt or Nero for my vote given they are in opposition to each other, but my vote comes down to 'do I trust Matt or not'.

I'm hoping to see at least a bit more to help make up my mind before deadline.

MovingPictures07 wrote:Does someone mind quickly summarizing the cases against Matt and Nero, for those of us like me who are catching up but still have some posts to go?

Nerolunar wrote:@ Sig: I didn´t know that. Still rubs me the wrong way how he glossed over my question considering the answer was that easy.

Seriously though, why would anyone carelessly vote randomly day 1? Your vote is valuable, dont throw it away like that. Not sure voting randomly is alignment-indicative to me, but I believe it´s wrong to not decide carefully how to vote (Or in my case, having to vote in a hurry because of time zones).

I read both Enrique and TH as slightly civ at the moment, Enrique being more civ than TH. By saying that I am not buddying up to Enrique, this is simply what I believe.

MP seems like he is trying really hard to look Town. I believe he might be an Indy. I haven´t thought of him in a long time, but he is to be included in my slightly baddie read.

Turnip Head wrote:

MacDougall wrote:Let's not just lynch a guy based on a player saying let's lynch them. Let's decide on who the best candidate is.

I tactically stopped attacking my suspects from Day 1 today and it revealed some interesting stuff. Under the microscope Turnip Head contributed plenty of discussion. As soon as I took the microscope away his contribution to discussion screeched to a grinding halt. Why?

That's like not even close to true.

Enrique wrote:

MovingPictures07 wrote:Does someone mind quickly summarizing the cases against Matt and Nero, for those of us like me who are catching up but still have some posts to go?

Don't lynch Matt I fucked up.

MacDougall wrote:I tactically stopped attacking my suspects from Day 1 today and it revealed some interesting stuff. Under the microscope Turnip Head contributed plenty of discussion. As soon as I took the microscope away his contribution to discussion screeched to a grinding halt. Why?

MovingPictures07 wrote:sig, I also wanted to say I apologize if I got too heated when I voted for you yesterday; I was getting increasingly frustrated and knew I'd probably have little time before EoD, and I was very pinged by you in the moment, so I voted for you. I don't regret my vote, but I didn't really have any solid baddie read on anyone else.

MacDougall wrote:I think sig and nero are both reasonable candidates and wouldn't actually mind seeing either of them flip. But, I would like it to be based on something more than DharmaHelper blatantly inviting lurkers to drive by vote whoever he says to.

MovingPictures07 wrote:

Enrique wrote:

MovingPictures07 wrote:Does someone mind quickly summarizing the cases against Matt and Nero, for those of us like me who are catching up but still have some posts to go?

Don't lynch Matt I fucked up.

You referring to this post?

If so, should I skip it or should I still read it? I just got to it.

MacDougall wrote:

Turnip Head wrote:

MacDougall wrote:Let's not just lynch a guy based on a player saying let's lynch them. Let's decide on who the best candidate is.

I tactically stopped attacking my suspects from Day 1 today and it revealed some interesting stuff. Under the microscope Turnip Head contributed plenty of discussion. As soon as I took the microscope away his contribution to discussion screeched to a grinding halt. Why?

That's like not even close to true.

Sorry I will further elaborate.

On day 1 you came across more committed to the game. Makes sense since you had to defend yourself in the thread. I have sensed a passive apathetic vibe from you without the influence of being suspected on day 2. DIsmissive of cases here and there. Making an observation over here sure. Sure you have posts. But they have lacked the fire of your day 1 posts.

Enrique wrote:

MovingPictures07 wrote:Does someone mind quickly summarizing the cases against Matt and Nero, for those of us like me who are catching up but still have some posts to go?

Don't lynch Matt I fucked up.

Turnip Head wrote: I have a surprisingly long list of players I feel good about and won't vote for. That list gets larger as more players make me feel good about their intentions. I have another list of players I currently feel okay about but am leaving open the possibility that I'm wrong this early. Then there are players who have not yet made me feel their civvieness and those are the players I want to hear more from. This list includes (I'm literally going down the player list and writing down the names of players I don't have a good feel for) Bass, bea, BR, Bubbles, ekeknat, Equivocate, Glorfindel, Lorab, Metalmarsh, Nero, sabie, Sorsha, sprityo, SVS, and Floyd. I realize that expecting more content from a few of these players is a pipe dream. But unless something drastic happens with one of the players not named, I'm probably voting for someone on this list.

linki Holy hell

MovingPictures07 wrote:

Enrique wrote:

MovingPictures07 wrote:Does someone mind quickly summarizing the cases against Matt and Nero, for those of us like me who are catching up but still have some posts to go?

Don't lynch Matt I fucked up.

You referring to this post?

If so, should I skip it or should I still read it? I just got to it.

Turnip Head wrote:

MacDougall wrote:

Turnip Head wrote:

MacDougall wrote:Let's not just lynch a guy based on a player saying let's lynch them. Let's decide on who the best candidate is.

I tactically stopped attacking my suspects from Day 1 today and it revealed some interesting stuff. Under the microscope Turnip Head contributed plenty of discussion. As soon as I took the microscope away his contribution to discussion screeched to a grinding halt. Why?

That's like not even close to true.

Sorry I will further elaborate.

On day 1 you came across more committed to the game. Makes sense since you had to defend yourself in the thread. I have sensed a passive apathetic vibe from you without the influence of being suspected on day 2. DIsmissive of cases here and there. Making an observation over here sure. Sure you have posts. But they have lacked the fire of your day 1 posts.

Earlier you said my Day 1 cases lacked chutzpah now you're saying they had fire so I have no idea how to please you and I'm not interested in trying to do so.

MovingPictures07 wrote:

Turnip Head wrote: I have a surprisingly long list of players I feel good about and won't vote for. That list gets larger as more players make me feel good about their intentions. I have another list of players I currently feel okay about but am leaving open the possibility that I'm wrong this early. Then there are players who have not yet made me feel their civvieness and those are the players I want to hear more from. This list includes (I'm literally going down the player list and writing down the names of players I don't have a good feel for) Bass, bea, BR, Bubbles, ekeknat, Equivocate, Glorfindel, Lorab, Metalmarsh, Nero, sabie, Sorsha, sprityo, SVS, and Floyd. I realize that expecting more content from a few of these players is a pipe dream. But unless something drastic happens with one of the players not named, I'm probably voting for someone on this list.

linki Holy hell

Turnip, can you elaborate on why those players make your list more so than the ones you omitted, or vice versa?

a2thezebra wrote:

Turnip Head wrote:

MacDougall wrote:

Turnip Head wrote:

MacDougall wrote:Let's not just lynch a guy based on a player saying let's lynch them. Let's decide on who the best candidate is.

I tactically stopped attacking my suspects from Day 1 today and it revealed some interesting stuff. Under the microscope Turnip Head contributed plenty of discussion. As soon as I took the microscope away his contribution to discussion screeched to a grinding halt. Why?

That's like not even close to true.

Sorry I will further elaborate.

On day 1 you came across more committed to the game. Makes sense since you had to defend yourself in the thread. I have sensed a passive apathetic vibe from you without the influence of being suspected on day 2. DIsmissive of cases here and there. Making an observation over here sure. Sure you have posts. But they have lacked the fire of your day 1 posts.

Earlier you said my Day 1 cases lacked chutzpah now you're saying they had fire so I have no idea how to please you and I'm not interested in trying to do so.

This is a cop out and you know it.

Enrique wrote:Zebra I think you're looking at TH from the wrong angle entirely.

I disagree about his content for what it's worth.

Also Matt you're a silly silly man. You're wrong but not bad.

Turnip Head wrote:

MacDougall wrote:

Turnip Head wrote:

MacDougall wrote:Let's not just lynch a guy based on a player saying let's lynch them. Let's decide on who the best candidate is.

I tactically stopped attacking my suspects from Day 1 today and it revealed some interesting stuff. Under the microscope Turnip Head contributed plenty of discussion. As soon as I took the microscope away his contribution to discussion screeched to a grinding halt. Why?

That's like not even close to true.

Sorry I will further elaborate.

On day 1 you came across more committed to the game. Makes sense since you had to defend yourself in the thread. I have sensed a passive apathetic vibe from you without the influence of being suspected on day 2. DIsmissive of cases here and there. Making an observation over here sure. Sure you have posts. But they have lacked the fire of your day 1 posts.

Earlier you said my Day 1 cases lacked chutzpah now you're saying they had fire so I have no idea how to please you and I'm not interested in trying to do so.