Re: Dr. Who Mafia - Day 4
Posted: Sun Oct 05, 2014 10:58 am
Epig, that behemoth is quite impressive. I might be willing to vote Enrique for the day because of it.
Epignosis wrote:Isn't it cool?S~V~S wrote:Those are possibly the bandwagony-est votes I have ever seen.
I vote Enrique and he takes votes.
I vote juliets and she takes votes.
I love my power.
Other people are bad, not just potentially Enrique. Last time we followed Epi, we lost Juliets 1.0. Not sure I want to go back down that road until we sort out what happened during the last lynch. Epi came back as a new person same as the old person. FIRST post back, threatens Enrique. He has been on Enrique since day zero, with a time out to lynch Juliets.Epignosis wrote:Enrique.
Daddy's back.
The only difference here is it's not just Epi who's eyeballin' Rico...S~V~S wrote:Yeah, his posts on Juliets were convincing, too.
A lot of people agreed with a Snow Dog suspicion too... and Epig... enough to get them lynched. . . does that mean we never vote with that person again?S~V~S wrote:Yeah, his posts on Juliets were convincing, too.
I would like a Made or Enrique lynch?S~V~S wrote:I think it was pretty obvious that Made was being saved. If not Made, I would prefer to lynch one of the late Snowy voters, MP, Dana or MM. I lean hardest towards Dana, she really sounded kinda pissy that Snowy was back and able to discuss his own lynch. But I could go for MP as well. I do think that is putting the cart before the horse though. But with those extra votes on the civs, I stongly prefer that people try to keep the votes fairly compact. I am willing to compromise to do so, and hope others will as well.
No, it doesn't mean we never vote with them again. But I don't trust his instincts. This was his first post after the Juliets lynch:Dom wrote:A lot of people agreed with a Snow Dog suspicion too... and Epig... enough to get them lynched. . . does that mean we never vote with that person again?S~V~S wrote:Yeah, his posts on Juliets were convincing, too.I would like a Made or Enrique lynch?S~V~S wrote:I think it was pretty obvious that Made was being saved. If not Made, I would prefer to lynch one of the late Snowy voters, MP, Dana or MM. I lean hardest towards Dana, she really sounded kinda pissy that Snowy was back and able to discuss his own lynch. But I could go for MP as well. I do think that is putting the cart before the horse though. But with those extra votes on the civs, I stongly prefer that people try to keep the votes fairly compact. I am willing to compromise to do so, and hope others will as well.
He has literally been gunning for Enrique since Day Zero. I would rather let someone else drive, tbh. His very first post after replacing back in was warning Enrique. I think he has tunnelvision, and i think he is a very convincing writer, and I think he is a true believer. He really really believes everything he says, and that confidence is convincing. I don't feel comfortable trusting him at this time.Epignosis wrote:This.juliets wrote:After the lynch is over Epi is going to say he is not sorry because, he will say, I did baddie things. Or made mistakes that couldn't be corrected. Keep in mind people make mistakes like posting in the wrong thread all the time - civs and baddies It sure would be nice to know what those baddie things are that I did. Please the rest of you, hound Epi when he says something is so and make him explain himself. This is what happens when you let him get away with thinking things are one way and no one challenges him. Remember if you are civ it could be you next. He and someone else votes for you, people come in the thread who are tired and just take the easy way.
To be honest no, not really othewrise i would have names him as a suspect earlier. If you remember I was previously voting between hedge, daisy and Made. Hedge because of your suspicions, Daisy due to MP and SVS and Made from my own suspicion.juliets wrote:Snowy, was there anything besides Epi's case that has you convinced about Enrique?
My opinion is you should vote for whoever you think is bad no matter whether it was your own suspicion or originally someone else's. I was just asking about Enrique because I'm trying to make sure I understand everything about the case against him. I thought you might have another piece.Snow Dog wrote:To be honest no, not really othewrise i would have names him as a suspect earlier. If you remember I was previously voting between hedge, daisy and Made. Hedge because of your suspicions, Daisy due to MP and SVS and Made from my own suspicion.juliets wrote:Snowy, was there anything besides Epi's case that has you convinced about Enrique?
You think I should stick with my own suspicion?
Sorry, no. I may do a read of him though.juliets wrote:My opinion is you should vote for whoever you think is bad no matter whether it was your own suspicion or originally someone else's. I was just asking about Enrique because I'm trying to make sure I understand everything about the case against him. I thought you might have another piece.Snow Dog wrote:To be honest no, not really othewrise i would have names him as a suspect earlier. If you remember I was previously voting between hedge, daisy and Made. Hedge because of your suspicions, Daisy due to MP and SVS and Made from my own suspicion.juliets wrote:Snowy, was there anything besides Epi's case that has you convinced about Enrique?
You think I should stick with my own suspicion?
Because, for me at least, he is good at finding mafia. And his argument seems pretty good this time as well. So that's a double whammy.Enrique wrote:I honestly don't understand how people take Epignosis seriously.
Well that's just a lie. Show me where i was told to change my vote!Enrique wrote:The whole Snow Dog case is there for you to see, not before, but during the lynch. He changed his vote several times according to what anyone told him to do. Of course it turned out to be the wrong choice, but it's not really fair to say he got lynched for no reason.sabie12 wrote:I participate when I can I'm just not around that often and when not much is going on I don't say much. This particular poll doesn't take much discussion. It's all the same thing. Made and enrique are still my suspects and I'm still not sure what to think of MP and his super long posts suspecting a bunch of different people. Not sure what went down with the Snow Dog thing. I didn't see anything suspicious there and was unsure as to why people really wanted to vote for them in the first place. I hadn't seen a lot of posts prior to that regarding them so I thought it was weird that all of the sudden a bunch of people moved to lynch a civvie. Also, wary of Epi coming back not sure what to think of that yet.
Like, trust me guys, I'm not intentionally setting myself up for failure with every vote. If I'd thought Snow Dog was a civvie I wouldn't have voted for him. Second vote, too, when there were three different people with 3 votes, one with 4 and one with 5. Not trying to save anyone. But I still thought he was hella suspicious so my vote went there.
linki @ Epig- Not following.
Setting up a few more civvie lynches when you Dusty Spoon bad King of Hearts see.Enrique wrote:Plus, I think at least MP, Dana and zeek are civvie.
Nobody told me to vote for anything. I asked people who to vote for, just to see what they would say, but nobody told me to vote anything. Did they?Enrique wrote:Just woke up. I look pretty screwed. I'll catch up in a bit.
Lying about what? Snow Dog would literally follow anyone's lead, vote, then ask someone completely different who he should vote for. That's a thing that happened. Exactly the kind of thing Epig would call moving around.
Chris, the reason I don't think it was a save is because there were SO many lynch candidates, and SD didn't start getting votes until the end. Plus, I think at least MP, Dana and zeek are civvie. MM's vote was sketchy as hell and I have no idea about Gotrees, but I definitely don't think the entire lynch was a "save."
How full of yourself do you need to be? The time I had interacted with her before, her "slip" hadn't happened yet. I saw that and immediately thought of the worst. It's not exactly like you had spoken out against her before, either.Epignosis wrote:Not buying it. If I had not brought it up, NO ONE would have voted for juliets. Including you. If I hadn't said anything against juliets, you wouldn't have said anything about her. Would you like to know how I know that? Because you only interacted with juliets once, and you agreed with her. It wasn't until I made my case against her that you latched onto it like a leech. And then you turn around and lynch poor K9.Enrique wrote:Because obviously, you are the only player capable of picking up on potential baddie behavior. I didn't follow your vote for juliets, that's absolute bullshit, I have my own reasons and followed through on the player I thought was likeliest to be bad.
If I had a penny for every time you shrugged me off.I don't need to ask Mafia why they found civilians suspicious. I understand their reasons.Enrique wrote:I did express suspicion of you first, and finally gave in to it on Day 2:
But wait, you literally just brought up how I found you suspicious? You honestly don't think I ever made a post about you? Do I need to link all of those now? The post you quoted before is essential here.Day 2?
Enrique wrote:Voted. Not sure what I was waiting for.There was more dancing on Day 2 than there was actual substance from Enrique, but I'll let others comb through that ballroom. Enrique demanded others give a reason when they voted for him, but he didn't come up with one until near the end.Enrique wrote:Oh so Bass voted for me. Cool. Look forward to hearing a reason.
... Epignosis, stop. You're allowed to be pretentious, but a little self-awareness doesn't hurt. Of course you have a playstyle, and it's one that will never let us play together without being at each other's throats.The vilest word in Mafia is "clearly," which is both an evil adverb and one that assumes everyone agrees with you. I don't have a play style. People think I do. I don't. I do whatever amuses me at the time. You may have a play style, and I have no problem with yours. The problem is that you got a bad role, and that you didn't do a very good job on Day 1 concealing it.Enrique wrote:You turned out civvie, so clearly, the problem here is that our playstyles don't mesh.
Key difference: I'm trying. We're gonna see at endgame who came closer to the truth.Ah, I'm still suspicious and haven't contributed.Enrique wrote:But you were still hella suspicious and honestly I don't think you've contributed anything to the civvie cause all game. So how's that?
Well now, let's see.
I got one civilian lynched. You nailed three in a row- well done. I want to lynch you and have been wanting to since Day 1. You say things like "hella suspicious."Since you've leveled this accusation against me, what have YOU contributed to the civilian cause? Besides reducing their numbers and making it easier for them to figure out who's bad, I mean.
Is that not a reason? Because five other people voted with me. Is every case in this game null unless you make it?Enrique wrote:This is such a terrible argument. So last second saves aren't a thing in the universe from where you play mafia? It was a tight lynch with several votes still missing, perfectly open for manipulation. I had multiple people agree with me on this point, and guess what? We had a last second vote-change from Snow Dog (I think his third change in that phase alone after asking about anyone who he should vote for) and up to six people thought that was worth lynching him for.Epignosis wrote:Why should this make him nervous? Think about it folks: We can switch our votes here as often as we like. What difference does it make that people were online and hadn't voted? This concern was a VOID concern. It gives the sense of urgency without there actually being any.Enrique wrote:All these people online who haven't voted are making me nervous. So easy to switch the tide at the last possible second.Including you. You voted Snow Dog over a vote change. That's it. No other reason given.Enrique wrote:Really tempted to vote for Snow Dog. That last minute vote change doesn't sit well with me at all.
Honestly I'll probably just have to vote for whoever isn't me this lynch. I started out with three guaranteed votes against me, and have only been getting more. The only person I can be 100% sure of in this game is myself, so yeah, in all likelihood I'm gonna be a bitch and vote to save myself. Didn't I vote for Snow Dog yesterday? Doesn't that go hand in hand with the post you're quoting?Duh indeed.Enrique wrote:To save Snow Dog / Hedgie, duh.MovingPictures07 wrote:I guess I'm switching to Snow Dog for now, just to get it off LC.
Linki MM: Why should I vote Made?
You think Made is good and people were trying to save Snow Dog or Hedgeowl? So...are you going to vote Hedgeowl? Of course not. You need to see which way the wind is blowing. You need to see someone call out someone who mistakenly posted in another thread. You need to see some support against someone who wants to lynch you. You need to see someone switch his vote.
You have no real suspicions. You are (to use a term that maintains currency with my students) "fake."
Trust me, the baddies' endgame in mafia isn't setting themselves up for failure with every lynch. They have a nightkill. They kill people with it. I think they're good as long as their team isn't being lynched.Because you're bad?Enrique wrote:"Hiding in plain sight" wasn't a valid argument when LC used it against you, was it? So why the hell do you think I'd spend every lynch on this game having a civvie killed? Clearly my judgement hasn't been on point but it's bullshit to pin all of this on me.Epignosis wrote:Three civilian lynches- the only one to participate in all three. Where is Long Con now to say someone is Mafia hiding in plain sight? Ah, there he is- "suspecting" both Enrique and Made but voting for Made.![]()
I think Enrique needs to go, and I'm not even done saying it.![]()
Ugh, and "clearly" again. Get that shit out of here.
I'd like a look at your track record so far. A quick skim of the Hall of Fame tells me you've never won a game as a civvie, and I've never seen you lead the charge against a baddie. Can I take a look at your credentials?Sorry. I choose to pretend I'm an Expert Baddie Hunter. It's fun. Bet you don't even know any real expert baddie hunters.Enrique wrote:If you get me lynched today, which is a strong possibility considering I'm pretty much starting the day with 3 votes, I'll find some comfort in knowing the thread will know how full of shit you are. Don't pretend you're an expert baddie hunter, Epignosis, you're embarrassing yourself.
When I'm gone you lose all credibility, so don't get too excitedWhen you're gone, I'll work out your teammates. That's because I'm pretending to be an expert baddie hunter for the next couple of weeks. I even have a badge!Enrique wrote:Oh, man, LC too? How many partners does that leave me at? I don't think there's a team with sufficient space for me, LC, Made, Dana and MP together. Never mind one that would be outed so quickly.Epignosis wrote:To answer your question more directly, Dom, it looks to me like Enrique is still dancing and his partner Long Con is trying to suspect him while protecting him.
Wait, you mean I'm moving around because I'm voting for a different person every day? You... do realize I haven't had a choice, right? I can't even handle this argument.You vote with Ep1 against jul1ets, then vote against Ep1. You vote with MM against Snow Dog and then say you're going to vote against MM. That's moving around. I would like you to stop moving altogether.Enrique wrote:Move around where? Can you please cite some examples? Because I don't know what the hell you're talking about.Epignosis wrote:English teacher fail.Dom wrote:Epig, do you think my concerns with Made are valid?
I didn't directly address your question at all.![]()
It has also been said that Made has been behaving differently than in other games. My sample size is small, but I'd say "lashing out, no u, misrepresentation" is par for the course when he's good.Dom wrote:Initially, Made said he missed something I said, and subsequently said he misread it. I thought teammates had filled him in on something, and he screwed up. I pressured. Response: lashing out, no u, misrepresentation. Then, he got very angry, and that read as even more baddie. He seems cornered.
If I am suspicious of Made, it's because he's defended Enrique, who moves around more than Bill Clinton's underwear.
That's a nice interpretation. How do you like this one: Full of shit means you're wrong, no idea means you're wrong, hate boner means you won't let go, and proving a point means you'll do the exact same thing you do with juliets and shrug it off as "he acted bad" while maintaining pride in the fact that you could get somebody lynched.You just uttered four different thoughts here. "Full of shit" means I'm lying. "No idea" what I'm talking about means I'm ignorant. A "hate boner" is something I will interpret as a sad youthful example of figurative language meaning "I don't like you." "Proving a point" means I have a point and I mean to prove it no matter what, win conditions be damned. All four scenarios cannot possibly be true.Enrique wrote:Wait, so was I wrong to interpret this postLong Con wrote:That's not accurate, I have never defended Enrique. The post you quoted earlier where I discussed Made and Enrique was intended to convey that I'm suspicious of both. I chose Made for this lynch because of the value we may find in regards to the Snow Dog lynch.
Obviously you suspect me now, so that's something. I'm not a baddie this time.
as you sharing my view that Epignosis is full of shit? Because that's how it reads to me. He has no idea what he's talking about, he just got a hate boner for me and needs to get it out of his system somehow. Regardless of what my role turns out to be, he'll feel like he proved a point somehow, and I'm honestly really annoyed by that.Long Con wrote:Epig, you assume you get better as you go. I posit that your ego may convince you that you are a improving, despite evidence to the contrary.
Yes, I daresay I would be quite annoyed if I were that confused.
Nope, you're still doing the same thing.Yeah, Snow Dog could've used a case. "Really tempted to vote for Snow Dog. That last minute vote change doesn't sit well with me at all." That's all you gave him.Enrique wrote:Don't know what you're doing, Epig, but if you actually think I'm bad then you can probably make some sort of case without all the misrepresentation and hypocrisy.
But how's this post? Is this case enough for you?
So... you're just re-quoting the quote I'm responding to. Nice. Nice. Still not an argument.For context, I'll put this here:Enrique wrote:linki- What? How did not I address his point? His was a ridiculous question, can hardly even call it a point. I don't vote for whoever I think will be lynched at any given day, that's just stupid.
Enrique wrote:Oh, I missed this post.Epignosis wrote:Am I interpreting this correctly? That you vote for people you don't think will actually get lynched?Enrique wrote:I can tell you I thought all 3 were bad at the time, and that I really didn't expect a Snow Dog lynch to actually happen that day (or Epig at the time I voted for that matter). I've chosen poorly but considering all 3 of you got lynched it's not exactly like I'm the only one.juliets wrote:I see Epi - thats what I mean about things slipping through that seem small that add up to something bigger. I'll be interested to see what Enrique has to say about your observation.
Tell me how that's a civilian strategy. :wonka:
I voted for the person I was the most suspicious of... do you actually expect me to be lynched every time you vote for me? I don't understand this argument.
I'm sorry are these not opinions I've maintained through the whole game? Have I not been seeing eye to eye with each of you for days now?zeek wrote:Setting up a few more civvie lynches when you Dusty Spoon bad King of Hearts see.Enrique wrote:Plus, I think at least MP, Dana and zeek are civvie.
That's... what you're doing now, BRBlack Rock wrote:He's done that a lot this game. You should reread him. He even tried to do that on what little posts I have made.Dom wrote:Have you even read a single post I have made about Made? You are COMPLETELY misrepresenting the facts. Completely.Enrique wrote:I don't know >_> It's not a part of my role, and while I did receive a recruitment boon, it wasn't anything this big and it's been spent for a while. I can only assume The Master got blocked, or I got protected or something. Regardless, I'm glad it didn't go through.zeek wrote:I want Enrique to explain honeytongued viridescence survived.
MP submergence Elo have explained.
@Snow Dog: I kinda disagree with the idea that self-preservation "isn't very civvie," since the only people we can be 100% confident on in this game is ourselves. Made didn't even do that, though, he kept his vote for Dom which was the only one. What opportunity did he jump on? Of course he wasn't gonna vote himself..
Honestly, I don't know if there's much more to this case on Made than "he's playing differently" which makes me wary of voting for him. I mean, there's the possibility of a save, but again... how could you possibly pull off a save where this guy had 5 votes and the final lynchee had only one an hour before the lynch? No team has the numbers to pull that off, and even if they did it'd be pretty dumb to all stack their votes on the same player instead of a lynch frontrunner. Made's voters yesterday were pretty much all drive bys, so I'm not sure why we're suddenly giving that "case" so much importance.
So yeah I guess I'm defending him now, I just don't get why people are so insistent that he must be the "focus" today.
I'm voting now. Guess who for...
Yes, and then he came back, changed it again, and got lynched.zeek wrote:Thats not true, he panoplied in bed tedge before the deadline.Enrique wrote:<snip> We had a last second vote-change from Snow Dog <snip>
Yep. I wasn't happy with my Daisy vote. Had to change it. I was dead tired though.Enrique wrote:Yes, and then he came back, changed it again, and got lynched.zeek wrote:Thats not true, he panoplied in bed tedge before the deadline.Enrique wrote:<snip> We had a last second vote-change from Snow Dog <snip>
Sorry about the quotes. My survival had nothing to do with my role, though, I don't know where that came from. My best guess is that The Master got blocked.juliets wrote:I have not re-read Enrique yet but I agree Epi had some good points about him. Of course, Epi had some "good" points about juliets 1.0 too and he was wrong so I really want to look at Enrique's posts before I buy in. Some people have cited his survival as evidence of him being a baddie but we have characters who can survive who are civ. I'm not seeing anything bad about LC yet, though I may have a blind spot where he is concerned. I don't see that he is protecting Enrique. I may vote Enrique today depending on what I find.
Beside the point, MP is the only one getting votes. No need in grouping the four of us witworm.Enrique wrote:I'm sorry are these not opinions I've maintained through the whole game? Have I not been seeing eye to eye with each of you for days now?zeek wrote:Setting up a few more civvie lynches when you Dusty Spoon bad King of Hearts see.Enrique wrote:Plus, I think at least MP, Dana and zeek are civvie.
I'm gonna flip civvie, so you have nothing to worry about anyway.
You're doing it again. Dana looked bad so you wanted to vote MP, now MP looks bad so you want to vote for me. Stick to your guns and don't let the votes for me keep piling up pleasekeys56000000000 wrote:I'm up for an Enriqye lynch, why not. When I was going after MP, Enri defended him pretty heavily, and I remain unconvinced that it was one civ looking out for another. If he flips mafioso, you all should look at MP with me.
I can't keep voting for the same person because everyone I've voted for has been lynched.juliets wrote:Enrique, what did you mean when you said:
You... do realize I haven't had a choice, right? I can't even handle this argument.
What do you mean by "you realize I've had no choice"?
Oh right, duh, don't know why I didn't get that right away.Enrique wrote:I can't keep voting for the same person because everyone I've voted for has been lynched.juliets wrote:Enrique, what did you mean when you said:
You... do realize I haven't had a choice, right? I can't even handle this argument.
What do you mean by "you realize I've had no choice"?
Can I ask for your own thoughts on the SD lynch? Do you honestly think he got 6 votes because there was a save going on? Might be something to MM, but I really don't think any of the other voters were trying to save anyone. There would've been much easier ways to go around that, what with all the vote spread, I'm pretty sure.zeek wrote:Beside the point, MP is the only one getting votes. No need in grouping the four of us witworm.Enrique wrote:I'm sorry are these not opinions I've maintained through the whole game? Have I not been seeing eye to eye with each of you for days now?zeek wrote:Setting up a few more civvie lynches when you Dusty Spoon bad King of Hearts see.Enrique wrote:Plus, I think at least MP, Dana and zeek are civvie.
I'm gonna flip civvie, so you have nothing to worry about anyway.
I'm voting cocaine you because you machinal obligor why you survived. harelipped think cocaine the Master.Enrique wrote:Can I ask for your own thoughts on the SD lynch? Do you honestly think he got 6 votes because there was a save going on? Might be something to MM, but I really don't think any of the other voters were trying to save anyone. There would've been much easier ways to go around that, what with all the vote spread, I'm pretty sure.
Well, the post you quoted me on was explaining the SD lynch, so I figured I'd ask.zeek wrote:I'm voting cocaine you because you machinal obligor why you survived. harelipped think cocaine the Master.Enrique wrote:Can I ask for your own thoughts on the SD lynch? Do you honestly think he got 6 votes because there was a save going on? Might be something to MM, but I really don't think any of the other voters were trying to save anyone. There would've been much easier ways to go around that, what with all the vote spread, I'm pretty sure.
Exactly, primordinate irregularity you did what people think MP did.Enrique wrote:What does that last line say? It's not "I think you're The Master," is it? Because you might wanna check who tried to kill me then
This was a good point, but I already had resigned myself to my plan, and frankly it was a bit of a relief. I also really didn’t have that much time anyway, I practically have done homework and almost nothing else most of the weekend, and only popped in for a minute or two whenever I needed a break.juliets wrote:MP, it doesn't have to be all or none. You could try just reducing the length of your posts by editing them. Or only allow yourself 3 posts a day. Something short of no posts at all.
MM, it pretty much boils down to I thought about it and re-read the situation and believe I was mistaken.Metalmarsh89 wrote:This is the post I am wondering about.MovingPictures07 wrote:Daisy is not bad though.Roxy wrote:Thats right MP you gave him NO time to respond to the votes coming in.
No chance to defend.
You and zeek all over the place.
Snows first game back.
You know him better than me which is why I was dismayed when you did not give him the same chance as Daisy.
You all set up w/e I am going after baddies. Hedge is my target. Idt anything will change my mind about her.
I have a theory involving this, and it essentially comes down to the fact that Enrique very well could be The Cyber Controller.zeek wrote:Elo, MP and Rico all claiming ripzfx methods of survival. Could Folding Raincoat be true?
Epignosis wrote:"Never."Elohcin wrote:I just wanted to speak up and say that I am following along in the thread, but I don't have anything to add to the discussions. Does that ever happen to you?
-MP
Did you just say you think Elo should go next? Why don't you feel a vote for Made this time or next time then?zeek wrote:And Elo moresque go next.