Re: MAD MAX: Day 6
Posted: Mon Oct 31, 2016 6:27 pm
I'm sure you wouldn't mind elaborating on your read, in that case.Dom wrote:Quin-- no.
I'm sure you wouldn't mind elaborating on your read, in that case.Dom wrote:Quin-- no.
Actually, I'm voting for you until you do elaborate. This is the only game related post you've written to or about me prior to my post yesterday, and I'm not even sure about this one because I don't know which paragraph you were referring to:Quin wrote:I'm sure you wouldn't mind elaborating on your read, in that case.Dom wrote:Quin-- no.
Why?Quin wrote:I'm sure you wouldn't mind elaborating on your read, in that case.Dom wrote:Quin-- no.
This is non-sensical.Quin wrote:Actually, I'm voting for you until you do elaborate. This is the only game related post you've written to or about me prior to my post yesterday, and I'm not even sure about this one because I don't know which paragraph you were referring to:Quin wrote:I'm sure you wouldn't mind elaborating on your read, in that case.Dom wrote:Quin-- no.
I'm not buying what you're selling.Spoiler: show
You literally just said our conversation on Day 6 was not relevant to your suspicion of me.Dom wrote:Why?Quin wrote:I'm sure you wouldn't mind elaborating on your read, in that case.Dom wrote:Quin-- no.
I said what I feel is relevant. I didn't suspect you until Day 6. I didn't suspect Sloonei until Day 6. What elaborating is there to do?This is non-sensical.Quin wrote:Actually, I'm voting for you until you do elaborate. This is the only game related post you've written to or about me prior to my post yesterday, and I'm not even sure about this one because I don't know which paragraph you were referring to:Quin wrote:I'm sure you wouldn't mind elaborating on your read, in that case.Dom wrote:Quin-- no.
I'm not buying what you're selling.Spoiler: show
The answer is no.Quin wrote:I'll get around to doing those ISO's today. Maybe more if I have the energy. In the meantime, I have a nasty ass rash under my armpit that's damn near impossible to ignore and I need to do something about it
I would also like an answer to this.
Sloonei wrote:Am I on this list for anything that happened prior to an hour ago?Dom wrote:You, Glorf, Quin, Lorab, and Scotty.Sloonei wrote:I wanted to hear his thoughts. He gave them. I am satisfied with his response for now.Dom wrote:When did you replace in?Quin wrote:No, I didn't know that the post you quoted even existed.
TBH, if you want to make a claim why not research it at all?
Did you?Sloonei wrote:I have a funny way of saying things.Dom wrote:That's not what you asked.
And you didn't answer my question(s).
Yes I did.
Why expect Epi to have a next suspect to vote when you didn't name one if Glorf was suddenly dead?
Who are you considering voting for?
Why do you suspect them now?Dom wrote:What are you even talking about?
I didn't suspect either of you until Day 6
I tend to have tunnel vision when I latch onto a suspect. That has not inhibited my engagement. My schedule IRL, on the other hand, has limited my time. I'm going away tomorrow and have been swamped at work getting everything in place for me to be away. Plus, it's a trip that requires a bunch of prep work. But I have some time tonight to play.JaggedJimmyJay wrote:Perhaps a little too consistent. Your focus in recent phases has been narrowed enough that it has inhibited your engagement with the broader scope of discussion, and that's beneficial to you if you're bad.LoRab wrote:I've been consistent enough in my thought that he's bad that I didn't really feel the need to say it again at that point.
LoRab
Sloonei: afraid to answer questions he asksJaggedJimmyJay wrote:Why do you suspect them now?Dom wrote:What are you even talking about?
I didn't suspect either of you until Day 6
Please point to specific examples.Dom wrote:Sloonei: afraid to answer questions he asksJaggedJimmyJay wrote:Why do you suspect them now?Dom wrote:What are you even talking about?
I didn't suspect either of you until Day 6
Quin: lies.
Why did it take someone who is not me or Sloonei to get you to share that information?Dom wrote:Sloonei: afraid to answer questions he asksJaggedJimmyJay wrote:Why do you suspect them now?Dom wrote:What are you even talking about?
I didn't suspect either of you until Day 6
Quin: lies.
Sloonei:JaggedJimmyJay wrote:Please point to specific examples.Dom wrote:Sloonei: afraid to answer questions he asksJaggedJimmyJay wrote:Why do you suspect them now?Dom wrote:What are you even talking about?
I didn't suspect either of you until Day 6
Quin: lies.
Maybe I was unclear, but I didn't intend that.Quin wrote:Why did it take someone who is not me or Sloonei to get you to share that information?Dom wrote:Sloonei: afraid to answer questions he asksJaggedJimmyJay wrote:Why do you suspect them now?Dom wrote:What are you even talking about?
I didn't suspect either of you until Day 6
Quin: lies.
Mac did suspect you. Then Mac didn't. I only knew about the former.Dom wrote:Sloonei:JaggedJimmyJay wrote:Please point to specific examples.Dom wrote:Sloonei: afraid to answer questions he asksJaggedJimmyJay wrote:Why do you suspect them now?Dom wrote:What are you even talking about?
I didn't suspect either of you until Day 6
Quin: lies.
Asked epi who'd he'd lynch IMMEDIATELY after his biggest suspect died. Was clearly peeved he didn't get an answer. When I asked him who he'd lynch if Glorfindel died, he had no answer.
Quin: Said Mac suspected me. Mac did not.
When I made this post.Quin wrote:I recalled a bunch of dialogue between you two and remembered 3J's GTH thing. Your post was more recent, though.Dom wrote:Quinn is a liar.![]()
I still want to read you, just based on the fact that I haven't since I first subbed in.JaggedJimmyJay wrote:Night 3 GTH chart re-uploaded:
Spoiler: show
I used the grin emoticon.Dom wrote:How am I supposed to see that you no longer suspect me from that?
Works for me. I'll move my vote eventually.Dom wrote:I'm unlikely to vote for you-- but I've got myon you.
My concern is that after sharing all of those takes on the other players, you didn't seem willing to call anyone a suspect. There were some "eyes" here and there, but on Day 6 I'd expect a more concrete set of reads. You have a clear read on INH, but otherwise it's a pile of waffles.LoRab wrote:As for other suspects...
That's how I play. I won't apologize for that. If you suspect me for it, so be it. I won't pretend to have greater suspicions that I actually have. I don't see any obvious baddies out there. It would be lovely if they showed themselves, but that doesn't often happen so obviously. So, we're stuck with vagueness. I'm just doing the best I can.JaggedJimmyJay wrote:My concern is that after sharing all of those takes on the other players, you didn't seem willing to call anyone a suspect. There were some "eyes" here and there, but on Day 6 I'd expect a more concrete set of reads. You have a clear read on INH, but otherwise it's a pile of waffles.LoRab wrote:As for other suspects...
Why do you suspect me?Dom wrote:Why?Quin wrote:I'm sure you wouldn't mind elaborating on your read, in that case.Dom wrote:Quin-- no.
I said what I feel is relevant. I didn't suspect you until Day 6. I didn't suspect Sloonei until Day 6. What elaborating is there to do?This is non-sensical.Quin wrote:Actually, I'm voting for you until you do elaborate. This is the only game related post you've written to or about me prior to my post yesterday, and I'm not even sure about this one because I don't know which paragraph you were referring to:Quin wrote:I'm sure you wouldn't mind elaborating on your read, in that case.Dom wrote:Quin-- no.
I'm not buying what you're selling.Spoiler: show
This isn't a point I am inclined to keep pushing, because I don't necessarily feel differently about this game right now.LoRab wrote:That's how I play. I won't apologize for that. If you suspect me for it, so be it. I won't pretend to have greater suspicions that I actually have. I don't see any obvious baddies out there. It would be lovely if they showed themselves, but that doesn't often happen so obviously. So, we're stuck with vagueness. I'm just doing the best I can.JaggedJimmyJay wrote:My concern is that after sharing all of those takes on the other players, you didn't seem willing to call anyone a suspect. There were some "eyes" here and there, but on Day 6 I'd expect a more concrete set of reads. You have a clear read on INH, but otherwise it's a pile of waffles.LoRab wrote:As for other suspects...
What is nonsensical? That's a strong word.Dom wrote:This is non-sensical.
-__-LoRab wrote:Putting vote on Wilgy for now. Mainly because I don't want to forget to vote tomorrow.
I may change. Likely will. But Wilgy feels like the right choice for the moment.
If you don't think it's the case, what interest is it to you?DrWilgy wrote:-__-LoRab wrote:Putting vote on Wilgy for now. Mainly because I don't want to forget to vote tomorrow.
I may change. Likely will. But Wilgy feels like the right choice for the moment.
Hmm... I don't think this is the case, but how would the votes look if both Elo and Lorab were bad?
wait what? Is this really how you interpreted that exchange? This is nonsensical.Dom wrote:Sloonei:JaggedJimmyJay wrote:Please point to specific examples.Dom wrote:Sloonei: afraid to answer questions he asksJaggedJimmyJay wrote:Why do you suspect them now?Dom wrote:What are you even talking about?
I didn't suspect either of you until Day 6
Quin: lies.
Asked epi who'd he'd lynch IMMEDIATELY after his biggest suspect died. Was clearly peeved he didn't get an answer. When I asked him who he'd lynch if Glorfindel died, he had no answer.
Quin: Said Mac suspected me. Mac did not.
Quin admitted that he read my post wrong. Why are you taking issue with me being very confused as to why someone was arguing with me when we seemingly agreed?JaggedJimmyJay wrote:What is nonsensical? That's a strong word.Dom wrote:This is non-sensical.
I think it's posible Quin was just mistaken, sure. I just am watching out for Quin now. That was pretty blatant if you ask me, though.LoRab wrote:@Dom:
What if you reframed people you perceive as lying as being mistaken? And things being nonsensical as being different from what you'd think?
I don't suspect you currently, but your posts seem to unfairly target folks. I think if you step back, their posts may seem more innocuous. Also, that may allow you to find more suspicious behavior.
Yes. I asked you who you suspected and you did't even answer the question. You said you'll owrry about it after Glorfindel is dead which is about as non-town of an answer as I'd expect.Sloonei wrote:wait what? Is this really how you interpreted that exchange? This is nonsensical.Dom wrote:Sloonei:JaggedJimmyJay wrote:Please point to specific examples.Dom wrote:Sloonei: afraid to answer questions he asksJaggedJimmyJay wrote:Why do you suspect them now?Dom wrote:What are you even talking about?
I didn't suspect either of you until Day 6
Quin: lies.
Asked epi who'd he'd lynch IMMEDIATELY after his biggest suspect died. Was clearly peeved he didn't get an answer. When I asked him who he'd lynch if Glorfindel died, he had no answer.
Quin: Said Mac suspected me. Mac did not.
Sloonei wrote:I am currently voting for Glorfindel until further notice. I am also considering everyone else.Dom wrote:Sloonei who are you going to vote for?
if they die who are you going to vote for?
if they die who are you going to vote for?
Quinn: Citation needed that Mac didn't like me.
Note the second question addressed to Quin. This is just a light conversation-starter type of post. I'm just peppering the two players I can see in the thread with standard mafia questions. These are really the same question: "Who are your suspects?" But, as I am a player who asks a ton of questions in this game, I get bored of typing the same words over and over and over and over again, so sometimes I like to spice it up! I throw whole new, colorful sets of words at people! One way that I like to do this is to ask people "Who they're voting for" instead "who they suspect". Don't believe me? Here's some more examples from this game:Sloonei wrote:Epi, who you gonna vote for now that Mr Mac is dead?
Quin, who's your supposed 3 person scum team?
linkSloonei wrote:Who are you gonna vote for, Mr Quin?
linkSloonei wrote:who you gonna vote for, champ?motel room wrote:righty-o
link (admittedly the context is a little different on this one)Sloonei wrote:Who do you want to vote for, mac?
linkSloonei wrote:Who you gonna vote for, Dom?
Simply because we can't ignore plausible options. If enough evidence appears for me to believe that Lorab may be bad it will be a good thought.JaggedJimmyJay wrote:If you don't think it's the case, what interest is it to you?DrWilgy wrote:-__-LoRab wrote:Putting vote on Wilgy for now. Mainly because I don't want to forget to vote tomorrow.
I may change. Likely will. But Wilgy feels like the right choice for the moment.
Hmm... I don't think this is the case, but how would the votes look if both Elo and Lorab were bad?
I am not sure I understand your original question here.DrWilgy wrote:Simply because we can't ignore plausible options. If enough evidence appears for me to believe that Lorab may be bad it will be a good thought.JaggedJimmyJay wrote:If you don't think it's the case, what interest is it to you?DrWilgy wrote:-__-LoRab wrote:Putting vote on Wilgy for now. Mainly because I don't want to forget to vote tomorrow.
I may change. Likely will. But Wilgy feels like the right choice for the moment.
Hmm... I don't think this is the case, but how would the votes look if both Elo and Lorab were bad?
*FixedSloonei wrote:I am not sure I understand your original question here.DrWilgy wrote:Simply because we can't ignore plausible options. If enough evidence appears for me to believe that Lorab may be bad it will be a good thought.JaggedJimmyJay wrote:If you don't think it's the case, what interest is it to you?DrWilgy wrote:-__-LoRab wrote:Putting vote on Wilgy for now. Mainly because I don't want to forget to vote tomorrow.
I may change. Likely will. But Wilgy feels like the right choice for the moment.
Hmm... I don't think this is the case, but how would the votes have looked if both Elo and Lorab were bad? Those few days ago
I was not.DrWilgy wrote:While a single sentence may be hard, the strongest cause of suspicion is in the above quote.DrWilgy wrote:Actually, you are bad. Explain this Sloonei.Sloonei wrote:if INH is town, Wilgy looks bad right now.
I feel that Sloonei was fully expecting a INH civ flip and over eagerly tried to throw fault at me for thus flip.
RE: The orange: How is that irrelevant to what you asked? You asked my explain why you looked bad. I think you look bad because you appear to have forgotten what your read on me was. That's the #1 reason I suspect you, how can you say it's irrelevant to the question of why I think you are bad. And I added the "from my perspective" thing because I don't think anyone else would be as hyper-aware of what your read on me is/was as I am. Yeah, it's a bit of a redundancy but whatever.This is irrelevant to the question I asked. "from my perspective" is also a fodder statement. Of course this is from your perspective, this is your thought. I get baddie vibes from fodder statements like this, as it's symptoms of a skittling player. Baddies skittle more than civs.Sloonei wrote:Mostly your treatment of after the deadline. I only qualified the statement because if INH flipped bad it'd be hard to argue that the guy who just hammered on a baddie is also a baddie. But, from my perspective, it looks like you genuinely just forgot that you'd dropped your suspicion of me and then had to cover your tracks.
Plus you never told us why you went from INH to indi and back to INH in the final minutes. What inspired you to move your vote to indiglo? How do you feel about Glorfindel?
This is just false as I explained my vote changes in the following quotes.
[a bunch of quotes where Wilgy explains what he was doing at the end of Day 5]
Linki - Stop saying things that aren't happening Sloonei.