Page 58 of 81
Re: Philosophers' Mafia [DAY 4]
Posted: Sun Jul 26, 2020 9:18 pm
by NANOOKTHEGREATANDFEARSOME
tutuu wrote: ↑Sun Jul 26, 2020 9:16 pm
i thought this is his 3rd forum game
oh so u must play with him on voice? yayyy!!!
We were scum together in a 451 game that just ended
Dunia was there too!
I couldn’t really talk about it cause it was ongoing but yeah I don’t think he’s been outside of his wolf range. Bit more self aware, but also a bit less on top of mechanics, so it kinda just balanced out

Re: Philosophers' Mafia [DAY 4]
Posted: Sun Jul 26, 2020 9:19 pm
by tutuu
damn nanook its not fair u CHEATED >:(
Re: Philosophers' Mafia [DAY 4]
Posted: Sun Jul 26, 2020 9:20 pm
by NANOOKTHEGREATANDFEARSOME
If Proto town it probably means checks are meaningless? I uh
Don’t think it’s optimal to start thinking along those lines until/unless Proto flips town tho, it’s a lot of unnecessary work if Occam’s razor applies and he’s just the last mafia

Re: Philosophers' Mafia [DAY 4]
Posted: Sun Jul 26, 2020 9:20 pm
by Hally
i guess it can be proto plus one of iaafr or amy
but like
i don’t think that makes sense
Re: Philosophers' Mafia [DAY 4]
Posted: Sun Jul 26, 2020 9:21 pm
by NANOOKTHEGREATANDFEARSOME
tutuu wrote: ↑Sun Jul 26, 2020 9:19 pm
damn nanook its not fair u CHEATED >:(
I didn’t cheat, I just had an advanced screening kek
Re: Philosophers' Mafia [DAY 4]
Posted: Sun Jul 26, 2020 9:22 pm
by Hally
are we hammering or waiting for amy
Re: Philosophers' Mafia [DAY 4]
Posted: Sun Jul 26, 2020 9:22 pm
by NANOOKTHEGREATANDFEARSOME
Worlds of two are really complicated and make my brain hurt too much to think about rn tbh
Especially since game is likely just about to end

Re: Philosophers' Mafia [DAY 4]
Posted: Sun Jul 26, 2020 9:23 pm
by NANOOKTHEGREATANDFEARSOME
Hammer is fine, Amy faking a red doesn’t get her a win so as long as she claims her clear tonight it doesn’t matter
Re: Philosophers' Mafia [DAY 4]
Posted: Sun Jul 26, 2020 9:23 pm
by NANOOKTHEGREATANDFEARSOME
(Assuming the game even keeps going!)
Re: Philosophers' Mafia [DAY 4]
Posted: Sun Jul 26, 2020 9:23 pm
by tutuu
im gonna play by protocol and not vote yet but if u guys wanna quickhammer i wont stop u
Re: Philosophers' Mafia [DAY 4]
Posted: Sun Jul 26, 2020 9:23 pm
by Hally
i mean like
proto having me as top town and then suddenly flipping to tunneling me and working hard against the me/nut/lc clears was pretty wolfy lol
Re: Philosophers' Mafia [DAY 4]
Posted: Sun Jul 26, 2020 9:24 pm
by NANOOKTHEGREATANDFEARSOME
Yeh his “I assume town are lying about their roles” was pretty

too
Re: Philosophers' Mafia [NIGHT 2]
Posted: Sun Jul 26, 2020 9:25 pm
by iaafr
iaafr wrote: ↑Fri Jul 24, 2020 12:30 am
Re: Philosophers' Mafia [DAY 4]
Posted: Sun Jul 26, 2020 9:26 pm
by Hally
he was basically doing what he needed to do to avoid being poe clamped if wolf
Re: Philosophers' Mafia [DAY 4]
Posted: Sun Jul 26, 2020 9:26 pm
by tutuu
lmao all of those were town
Re: Philosophers' Mafia [DAY 4]
Posted: Sun Jul 26, 2020 9:27 pm
by Hally
lmao
“low power” he said
“chill” he said
Re: Philosophers' Mafia [DAY 4]
Posted: Sun Jul 26, 2020 9:27 pm
by tutuu
Re: Philosophers' Mafia [DAY 4]
Posted: Sun Jul 26, 2020 9:28 pm
by Hally
tbh cop was only useful because we had flipped scum D1 but without a scum flip results would have been meaningless
and doc was two shot
vig’s were each one shot
still a lot of power though
Re: Philosophers' Mafia [DAY 4]
Posted: Sun Jul 26, 2020 9:29 pm
by Hally
but we have no idea what power scum had soooo
Re: Philosophers' Mafia [DAY 4]
Posted: Sun Jul 26, 2020 9:30 pm
by tutuu
Hally wrote: ↑Sun Jul 26, 2020 9:26 pm
he was basically doing what he needed to do to avoid being poe clamped if wolf
so u say, but then i remember nutella from yesterday pushing the idea that wwh is godfather

Re: Philosophers' Mafia [DAY 4]
Posted: Sun Jul 26, 2020 9:32 pm
by NANOOKTHEGREATANDFEARSOME
“Light” role madness was a questionable descriptor tbh
Re: Philosophers' Mafia [DAY 4]
Posted: Sun Jul 26, 2020 9:33 pm
by iaafr
i expected far more roles like mine and maybe 2-3 "actual" roles with low x-shot
Re: Philosophers' Mafia [DAY 4]
Posted: Sun Jul 26, 2020 9:34 pm
by nutella
loltsp
[VOTE:
proto] aubergine
Re: Philosophers' Mafia [DAY 4]
Posted: Sun Jul 26, 2020 9:34 pm
by nutella
thats -1
Re: Philosophers' Mafia [DAY 4]
Posted: Sun Jul 26, 2020 9:36 pm
by NANOOKTHEGREATANDFEARSOME
Hell yeah baby quick hammering mafia gets my blood racing
Re: Philosophers' Mafia [DAY 4]
Posted: Sun Jul 26, 2020 9:36 pm
by tutuu
w/e yolo
[VOTE:
proto] aubergine
Re: Philosophers' Mafia [DAY 4]
Posted: Sun Jul 26, 2020 9:36 pm
by Hally
tutuu wrote: ↑Sun Jul 26, 2020 9:30 pm
Hally wrote: ↑Sun Jul 26, 2020 9:26 pm
he was basically doing what he needed to do to avoid being poe clamped if wolf
so u say, but then i remember nutella from yesterday pushing the idea that wwh is godfather
i mean
wwh being godfather is a far more likely world than whatever me/nut/lc tinfoil y’all were indulging in

Re: Philosophers' Mafia [DAY 4]
Posted: Sun Jul 26, 2020 9:40 pm
by TonyStarkPrime
you're killing me. should we just make this a turbo?
Protocultures has been killed! He was Lao-Tzu (TOWN)!
I'll wait until the next 9 to force start the day, but if I get actions in early and get around to it I'll start sooner rather than later.
Re: Philosophers' Mafia [DAY 4]
Posted: Sun Jul 26, 2020 9:42 pm
by tutuu
DUDE
Re: Philosophers' Mafia [DAY 4]
Posted: Sun Jul 26, 2020 9:42 pm
by tutuu
i dont wanna play i dont wanna play i dont wanna play i dont wanna play i dont wanna play i dont wanna play i dont wanna play i dont wanna play i dont wanna play i dont wanna play i dont wanna play i dont wanna play i dont wanna play i dont wanna play i dont wanna play i dont wanna play depression depression depression depression depression depression depression depression depression depression depression depression depression depression depression depression depression depression depression depression depression depression depression
Re: Philosophers' Mafia [DAY 4]
Posted: Sun Jul 26, 2020 9:42 pm
by Hally
i was literally in the middle of writing inb4 proto flips town as thread was closed rip
Re: Philosophers' Mafia [DAY 4]
Posted: Sun Jul 26, 2020 9:43 pm
by tutuu
1 mafia in amy and hally confirmed
Re: Philosophers' Mafia [DAY 4]
Posted: Sun Jul 26, 2020 9:43 pm
by NANOOKTHEGREATANDFEARSOME
Welp
That is kinda surprising
I guess we’re moving into “cop checks don’t mean anything cause the last scum is a godfather” territory?
Re: Philosophers' Mafia [DAY 4]
Posted: Sun Jul 26, 2020 9:44 pm
by Hally
tutuu wrote: ↑Sun Jul 26, 2020 9:43 pm
1 mafia in amy and hally confirmed
how is that confirmed
Re: Philosophers' Mafia [DAY 4]
Posted: Sun Jul 26, 2020 9:44 pm
by iaafr
fuck yeah i own its probably amy FUCK YEAH IAAFR GOAT
Re: Philosophers' Mafia [NIGHT 4]
Posted: Sun Jul 26, 2020 9:44 pm
by iaafr
REMINDER AMY LITERALLY SCUMCLAIMED IN HER SECOND POST
Re: Philosophers' Mafia [DAY 4]
Posted: Sun Jul 26, 2020 9:45 pm
by Hally
NANOOKTHEGREATANDFEARSOME wrote: ↑Sun Jul 26, 2020 9:43 pm
Welp
That is kinda surprising
I guess we’re moving into “cop checks don’t mean anything cause the last scum is a godfather” territory?
only person who could be incorrectly peeked is wwh
nut is just a villager idc about anyone’s tinfoil
Re: Philosophers' Mafia [DAY 4]
Posted: Sun Jul 26, 2020 9:45 pm
by NANOOKTHEGREATANDFEARSOME
Hally wrote: ↑Sun Jul 26, 2020 9:44 pm
tutuu wrote: ↑Sun Jul 26, 2020 9:43 pm
1 mafia in amy and hally confirmed
how is that confirmed
She’s operating on assumption that checks are meaningful I think?
Re: Philosophers' Mafia [DAY 0]
Posted: Sun Jul 26, 2020 9:45 pm
by iaafr
Amy wrote: ↑Sun Jul 19, 2020 9:26 pm
iaafr wrote: ↑Sun Jul 19, 2020 9:21 pm
didnt realize zack was a philosopher
i've always preferred the classics
anyways: hello and sorry and advance to those who don't know me. i help run mafia universe and i assure you it's not a position i attained through prowess at the game
there's like a 70% chance i'm legit just gonna fuck off until d1 glgl
CLASSICS R GREEK
Re: Philosophers' Mafia [NIGHT 4]
Posted: Sun Jul 26, 2020 9:45 pm
by NANOOKTHEGREATANDFEARSOME
Maybe it is just amy tho, idk
Re: Philosophers' Mafia [DAY 4]
Posted: Sun Jul 26, 2020 9:45 pm
by tutuu
Hally wrote: ↑Sun Jul 26, 2020 9:44 pm
tutuu wrote: ↑Sun Jul 26, 2020 9:43 pm
1 mafia in amy and hally confirmed
how is that confirmed
everyone else is confirmed town in the world where there is 1 living mafia remaining, assuming amy doesnt redcheck nanook
so if we are living in a world with 1 living mafia remaining, its amy or hally
if we are living in a world with 2 living mafia remaining, its amy + hally or iaafr + hally
Re: Philosophers' Mafia [DAY 4]
Posted: Sun Jul 26, 2020 9:45 pm
by WerewolfHunter
Is it day or night now?
I guess they were trying to frame them
Re: Philosophers' Mafia [NIGHT 4]
Posted: Sun Jul 26, 2020 9:46 pm
by Hally
we can yeet amy idc
Re: Philosophers' Mafia [DAY 0]
Posted: Sun Jul 26, 2020 9:46 pm
by iaafr
iaafr wrote: ↑Mon Jul 20, 2020 8:21 pm
Amy wrote: ↑Mon Jul 20, 2020 12:06 am
Alison wrote: ↑Sun Jul 19, 2020 10:32 pm
I actually think iaafr thinking his own play is scummy, and scrutinizing it, and half-jokingly(?) calling it scummy is pretty sketchy. On average, wolves tend to be far more aware of how scummy their posts look (with some exceptions), and they often see those posts as scummier than average because they're biased knowing their own alignment. Scumreading his own play is I think a pre-emptive thing to get ahead of people who might want to call those posts out and make them feel silly for doing so.
i want it known that he did something similar in his last non-mash towngame and kept it up for all of d1. this is NAI for him
nutella wrote: ↑Sun Jul 19, 2020 10:34 pm
I agree with this yeah, I think he's deffo in wolfrange so far
and you should know this, because you were in that game. what's different about him here?
3/30
Amy wrote: ↑Mon Jul 20, 2020 12:10 am
tutuu wrote: ↑Sun Jul 19, 2020 10:52 pm
24/30
tr on tim, i think its towny that he spent a post saying "wait did X rly do Y?" instead of taking 5 secs to scroll back and see for it himself. and im kinda feeling like he still didnt bother going back to look for it, he just assumed what im saying is true and went along with it and made a joke
this is a bad read on tim, because tim is a player who's generally extremely cognizant of his own posting and able to deliberately fake stuff like this as a wolf quite well
that said i think it's kind of villagery to make this read, maybe?
i'm torn on tutuu in general because i think the way they kinda jumped us out of shitposting phase by taking a jokepost seriously is something i've seen both alignments do and i'm not entirely sure which one i'm looking at here. gth probably v off tone but far from sure
4/30
Amy wrote: ↑Mon Jul 20, 2020 12:14 am
Alison wrote: ↑Mon Jul 20, 2020 12:09 am
If we're reading alignment based on avatars then a Your Name avatar has to be lock town right? Like that movie is on par with Madoka Magica.
Anyway even if the "call your own play scummy" thing is NAI for him I think the rest of my points are still valid.
i haven't seen madoka magica but i'm already pocketed gg
i think your disliking the use of the word "tunnel" there is again somewhat NAI for iaafr; i think there
may be something to your point on potential TMI on you/tutuu but i'm not willing to go anywhere near that until people start flipping, i think
idk i guess i just struggle to see anything iaafr's really done so far as being anything other than "iaafr being iaafr"
5/30
Amy wrote: ↑Mon Jul 20, 2020 12:17 am
i guess honestly given that it's d0 and doesn't matter, and that the threadstate mostly reflects this, it's probably lightly villagery in a vacuum for anyone to be actually Playing The Game at this point
which i think looks best for alison because she's taking it the most seriously
6/30
Amy wrote: ↑Mon Jul 20, 2020 12:18 am
Timsup2nothin wrote: ↑Mon Jul 20, 2020 12:15 am
Premature. Not bad. It was reasoned. Amy is correct that there was absolutely nothing outside my wolf range there, but as long as you give solid reasoning you aren't making a bad read. Just don't count it as a conclusion.
yeah perhaps better phrasing would have been "bad way to read tim
specifically"
side note ctrl+i not italicizing on this forum is yet another reason why phpBB needs to go away
7/30
Amy wrote: ↑Mon Jul 20, 2020 4:23 am
protocultures wrote: ↑Mon Jul 20, 2020 3:23 am
framing their introduction
background state of mind
this person comes to meme
and be excused for this mentality later in the game
do you not find it scummy?
it's a copypasta. i didn't write it
amy posts enclosed
these are all scum posts
first is scum post, meme copypasta that's not particularly original or fitting is >rand scum (based on experience with wiggles doing it once as scum, n=1 reads goat)
everything amy's posted so far is easily postable as scum. like scarily easily. i can't find a single thought by amy that makes me want to town her, and i don't think she'd be QUITE this underwhelming as town. think she's just low wim scum because she didn't particularly want to rand scum here and can't find the motivation to put her pride on the line by trying particularly hard. clarifying that the first post was a meme (and therefore invalid reason to sus) is a bit on the flatly defensive side; that sort of sus couldve been handled in a lot more playful manner (this point might be the weakest). amy is just completely transparently joyless in this game, and i think that's because of her alignment.
might not be a particularly convincing case, but i feel pretty good about this scumread.
sorry if wrong, this is my d1 tunnel.
[VOTE:
Amy] aubergine
townreads:
nutella, tutuu, protocultures
townleans:
tim, scirrus (guttest of gut), werewolfhunter, alison, long con
null/scumlean/flipfloppy:
nanook, radishes, benson, dyslexicon, coliniscool, kza, colonialbob
scumread:
amy
not giving deep reasons for any reads except the scumcase i wrote on amy for now. will start writing towncases sometime during the day, after more stuff has happened.
tempted to put benson in townleans, but... just a bit sketched by a few little things. similar thoughts with nanook/radishes. the rest of the people in that group don't seem to be playing to be read any townier than null regardless of actual alignment, so i feel like they're pretty understandable placements. also slightly sketched by alison, but i mildly mindmelded with the early tutuu sus (before i decided it was civ/civ) and thats enough to make me gth her town.
IAAFR GOAT
Re: Philosophers' Mafia [DAY 4]
Posted: Sun Jul 26, 2020 9:46 pm
by tutuu
NANOOKTHEGREATANDFEARSOME wrote: ↑Sun Jul 26, 2020 9:45 pm
Hally wrote: ↑Sun Jul 26, 2020 9:44 pm
tutuu wrote: ↑Sun Jul 26, 2020 9:43 pm
1 mafia in amy and hally confirmed
how is that confirmed
She’s operating on assumption that checks are meaningful I think?
why would they not be meaningful lol
its not even a godfather its literally bastard game if im lied that all mafia have the same nationality...
Re: Philosophers' Mafia [NIGHT 4]
Posted: Sun Jul 26, 2020 9:46 pm
by tutuu
iaafr wrote: ↑Sun Jul 26, 2020 9:46 pmIAAFR GOAT
I WAS RIGHT ON PROTO THO
Re: Philosophers' Mafia [NIGHT 4]
Posted: Sun Jul 26, 2020 9:47 pm
by WerewolfHunter
I think we should prob create another plan for this night
Re: Philosophers' Mafia [DAY 4]
Posted: Sun Jul 26, 2020 9:47 pm
by Hally
tutuu wrote: ↑Sun Jul 26, 2020 9:45 pm
Hally wrote: ↑Sun Jul 26, 2020 9:44 pm
tutuu wrote: ↑Sun Jul 26, 2020 9:43 pm
1 mafia in amy and hally confirmed
how is that confirmed
everyone else is confirmed town in the world where there is 1 living mafia remaining, assuming amy doesnt redcheck nanook
so if we are living in a world with 1 living mafia remaining, its amy or hally
if we are living in a world with 2 living mafia remaining, its amy + hally or iaafr + hally
ok well i am town so if amy flips town you are wrong somewhere js
Re: Philosophers' Mafia [NIGHT 4]
Posted: Sun Jul 26, 2020 9:48 pm
by tutuu
amy can be maf with iaafr my bad
Re: Philosophers' Mafia [NIGHT 4]
Posted: Sun Jul 26, 2020 9:48 pm
by Hally
it’s probably just amy
if we send in actions quick we can start day soon i think