The Syndicate

I have an agenda in disliking info, sure. But the fact that Epi was the one who pointed out that it looked like LC had info makes me doubt that, if he does, it is unable to be misinterpreted.

You trust LC, rabbit. I get it. I don't.

Linki, I never said it was all game, you said that. Just the last time I mentione LC, this morning, you popped in to defend him. Thats about it.

Metalmarsh89 wrote:Rabbit, real quick, what do you think of Golden? Civvie or Celestial?

I don't care. He was not a baddie.

Well, you should care. that may give you a read on other people.

rabbit8 wrote:

Epignosis wrote:

rabbit8 wrote:I think you have an agenda in discrediting LCs info.

That's what you say
Does it really happen to you?
Does that explain
This is the season for this display?

If you had even tried to explain yourself once this game I might really consider thinking different from how I am now. But you haven't. You have not made one effort to explain what you think.

Not a lot is missing
Every ounce of treasure found
And I believe that everyone should get what
They're allowed
Suspected of belief that comes suspended
In a sound
And everybody wants some

S~V~S wrote:Well, you should care. that may give you a read on other people.

No, it's a distraction. There is no reason to care.

Epignosis wrote:

rabbit8 wrote:

Epignosis wrote:

rabbit8 wrote:I think you have an agenda in discrediting LCs info.

That's what you say
Does it really happen to you?
Does that explain
This is the season for this display?

If you had even tried to explain yourself once this game I might really consider thinking different from how I am now. But you haven't. You have not made one effort to explain what you think.

Not a lot is missing
Every ounce of treasure found
And I believe that everyone should get what
They're allowed
Suspected of belief that comes suspended
In a sound
And everybody wants some

I think you and SVS are on a team.

rabbit8 wrote:

Metalmarsh89 wrote:Rabbit, real quick, what do you think of Golden? Civvie or Celestial?

I don't care. He was not a baddie.

What if I pointed out that Golden did not interact with TH at all this game? Not once. And he only mentioned him once in passing on Day 1.

Then what if I pointed out that Golden did want to lynch Epignosis on Day 1, and carried suspicion of him up until his death?



You suggested to me earlier that TH and Epignosis might be Celestial buddies. I think not.

rabbit8 wrote:

Epignosis wrote:

rabbit8 wrote:

Epignosis wrote:

rabbit8 wrote:I think you have an agenda in discrediting LCs info.

That's what you say
Does it really happen to you?
Does that explain
This is the season for this display?

If you had even tried to explain yourself once this game I might really consider thinking different from how I am now. But you haven't. You have not made one effort to explain what you think.

Not a lot is missing
Every ounce of treasure found
And I believe that everyone should get what
They're allowed
Suspected of belief that comes suspended
In a sound
And everybody wants some

I think you and SVS are on a team.

If only you knew.

rabbit8 wrote:

Epignosis wrote:

rabbit8 wrote:

Epignosis wrote:

rabbit8 wrote:I think you have an agenda in discrediting LCs info.

That's what you say
Does it really happen to you?
Does that explain
This is the season for this display?

If you had even tried to explain yourself once this game I might really consider thinking different from how I am now. But you haven't. You have not made one effort to explain what you think.

Not a lot is missing
Every ounce of treasure found
And I believe that everyone should get what
They're allowed
Suspected of belief that comes suspended
In a sound
And everybody wants some

I think you and SVS are on a team.

Absolutely not. Like I said, vote away. I won't be voting for him, but i am not trying to talk you or anyone else out of it.

linki~ ha ha ha ha

Metalmarsh89 wrote:

rabbit8 wrote:

Metalmarsh89 wrote:Rabbit, real quick, what do you think of Golden? Civvie or Celestial?

I don't care. He was not a baddie.

What if I pointed out that Golden did not interact with TH at all this game? Not once. And he only mentioned him once in passing on Day 1.

Then what if I pointed out that Golden did want to lynch Epignosis on Day 1, and carried suspicion of him up until his death?



You suggested to me earlier that TH and Epignosis might be Celestial buddies. I think not.

Nice point.

S~V~S wrote:

rabbit8 wrote:

Epignosis wrote:

rabbit8 wrote:

Epignosis wrote:

rabbit8 wrote:I think you have an agenda in discrediting LCs info.

That's what you say
Does it really happen to you?
Does that explain
This is the season for this display?

If you had even tried to explain yourself once this game I might really consider thinking different from how I am now. But you haven't. You have not made one effort to explain what you think.

Not a lot is missing
Every ounce of treasure found
And I believe that everyone should get what
They're allowed
Suspected of belief that comes suspended
In a sound
And everybody wants some

I think you and SVS are on a team.

Absolutely not. Like I said, vote away. I won't be voting for him, but i am not trying to talk you or anyone else out of it.

linki~ ha ha ha ha

Yes, like you tried to talk everyone out of a Zomba lynch.

Metalmarsh89 wrote:

rabbit8 wrote:

Metalmarsh89 wrote:Rabbit, real quick, what do you think of Golden? Civvie or Celestial?

I don't care. He was not a baddie.

What if I pointed out that Golden did not interact with TH at all this game? Not once. And he only mentioned him once in passing on Day 1.

Then what if I pointed out that Golden did want to lynch Epignosis on Day 1, and carried suspicion of him up until his death?



You suggested to me earlier that TH and Epignosis might be Celestial buddies. I think not.

Well if you want to give the baddies a NK target, be my guest. But I did not. NKing a team of 5 is what they want.

rabbit8 wrote:

S~V~S wrote:

rabbit8 wrote:

Epignosis wrote:

rabbit8 wrote:

Epignosis wrote:

rabbit8 wrote:I think you have an agenda in discrediting LCs info.

That's what you say
Does it really happen to you?
Does that explain
This is the season for this display?

If you had even tried to explain yourself once this game I might really consider thinking different from how I am now. But you haven't. You have not made one effort to explain what you think.

Not a lot is missing
Every ounce of treasure found
And I believe that everyone should get what
They're allowed
Suspected of belief that comes suspended
In a sound
And everybody wants some

I think you and SVS are on a team.

Absolutely not. Like I said, vote away. I won't be voting for him, but i am not trying to talk you or anyone else out of it.

linki~ ha ha ha ha

Yes, like you tried to talk everyone out of a Zomba lynch.

Yeah, there i actually did. I thought she was not bad. But here, I think I don;t trust this whole info thing. Maybe he is bad. But I don;t like this info thing. At all.

Linki~ why would the baddies want to NK all of the Celestials? They have to kill a hell of a lot more civs to meet their win cons.

It's a constant fight
A constant fight
You're pushing the needle to the red
Black and white
Who knows who's right
No substitute you're born you're dead

Yes, you did try to save Zomba after you went after and got Golden to believe she was a civve then you changed your mind, convenient.

Because the Celestials have BTSC and are team who would obviously try to help the civvies in this game, why are you playing dumb?

rabbit8 wrote:

Metalmarsh89 wrote:

rabbit8 wrote:

Metalmarsh89 wrote:Rabbit, real quick, what do you think of Golden? Civvie or Celestial?

I don't care. He was not a baddie.

What if I pointed out that Golden did not interact with TH at all this game? Not once. And he only mentioned him once in passing on Day 1.

Then what if I pointed out that Golden did want to lynch Epignosis on Day 1, and carried suspicion of him up until his death?



You suggested to me earlier that TH and Epignosis might be Celestial buddies. I think not.

Well if you want to give the baddies a NK target, be my guest. But I did not. NKing a team of 5 is what they want.

The baddies have plenty of targets. Myself and Bass for instance.

OK. I don't really care about you as a baddie target. All the civvies and Celestials are targets. It should be easier for the BTSC team to find baddies.

rabbit8 wrote:Yes, you did try to save Zomba after you went after and got Golden to believe she was a civve then you changed your mind, convenient.

Because the Celestials have BTSC and are team who would obviously try to help the civvies in this game, why are you playing dumb?

Go back and reread, dear. Golden got me to thin she was a civvie.

Get your facts straight before you say these things

And I am not playing dumb~ but helping the civvies =/=being the civvies. The baddies have to outnumber the civs & Celestials. lots more civs than Celestials, and the baddies know everyone not them. So I am not the one playing dumb.

S~V~S wrote:But I don't see myself talking myself into lynching someone who can't defend, snarky as i think that defense might wind up being.

For the record, you voted for Hawkeye (Lizzy) in X-Men even though he specifically said that he would be gone for the day, and thus unable to defend himself.

S~V~S wrote:

rabbit8 wrote:Yes, you did try to save Zomba after you went after and got Golden to believe she was a civve then you changed your mind, convenient.

Because the Celestials have BTSC and are team who would obviously try to help the civvies in this game, why are you playing dumb?

Go back and reread, dear. Golden got me to thin she was a civvie.

Get your facts straight before you say these things

And I am not playing dumb~ but helping the civvies =/=being the civvies. The baddies have to outnumber the civs & Celestials. lots more civs than Celestials, and the baddies know everyone not them. So I am not the one playing dumb.

Please.

And you know the baddies want to kill the BTSC team. Why are you playing dumb.

Metalmarsh89 wrote:

S~V~S wrote:But I don't see myself talking myself into lynching someone who can't defend, snarky as i think that defense might wind up being.

For the record, you voted for Hawkeye (Lizzy) in X-Men even though he specifically said that he would be gone for the day, and thus unable to defend himself.

She lies a lot.

Metalmarsh89 wrote:

S~V~S wrote:But I don't see myself talking myself into lynching someone who can't defend, snarky as i think that defense might wind up being.

For the record, you voted for Hawkeye (Lizzy) in X-Men even though he specifically said that he would be gone for the day, and thus unable to defend himself.

And I was tryig to disguise myself in a sock puppet game. And gone for the day =/= insanified. At Rm & LP, generally lynching those unable to defend was not done. I still don;t like to do it, and I know there are others who feel as i do. Call us old ladies.

linki, oh stop it ha ha ha You are making me spit my drink lol

rabbit8 wrote:OK. I don't really care about you as a baddie target. All the civvies and Celestials are targets. It should be easier for the BTSC team to find baddies.

But you don't seem to care whether Golden was in the BTSC group or not or for who he wanted to lynch.

I'm trying to point out that perhaps he was onto something.

Metalmarsh89 wrote:

rabbit8 wrote:OK. I don't really care about you as a baddie target. All the civvies and Celestials are targets. It should be easier for the BTSC team to find baddies.

But you don't seem to care whether Golden was in the BTSC group or not or for who he wanted to lynch.

I'm trying to point out that perhaps he was onto something.

yeah, and he trusted Zomba, too so

Whats your case? I want to hear it.

This is a post by Golden in response to Zomba.

Golden wrote:I'm actually feeling fairly good about both you and lizkeen now.

This is SVSs next post.

S~V~S wrote:

Zombarella wrote:I am going to vote for A Person right now. I don't want to lynch another active civ player, I'm going to go for someone who the baddies won't NK - either because he/she is one of them or because he/she is not playing and isn't a threat to them.

*votes A Person*

Low posters?

Do you have any actual suspicions? When you came in last night you tried pushing a suspicion of me, and it didn't take; do you suspect anyone?

I trust Golden's judgment; had I listened to him earlier, I would have backed off of BF. I am going to reread this AM and consider whether to listen to him now.

Who has their facts straight, now?

Metalmarsh89 wrote:

rabbit8 wrote:OK. I don't really care about you as a baddie target. All the civvies and Celestials are targets. It should be easier for the BTSC team to find baddies.

But you don't seem to care whether Golden was in the BTSC group or not or for who he wanted to lynch.

I'm trying to point out that perhaps he was onto something.

I don't want to focus on Golden for a reason. But you can if you wish.

rabbit8 wrote:This is a post by Golden in response to Zomba.

Golden wrote:I'm actually feeling fairly good about both you and lizkeen now.

This is SVSs next post.

S~V~S wrote:

Zombarella wrote:I am going to vote for A Person right now. I don't want to lynch another active civ player, I'm going to go for someone who the baddies won't NK - either because he/she is one of them or because he/she is not playing and isn't a threat to them.

*votes A Person*

Low posters?

Do you have any actual suspicions? When you came in last night you tried pushing a suspicion of me, and it didn't take; do you suspect anyone?

I trust Golden's judgment; had I listened to him earlier, I would have backed off of BF. I am going to reread this AM and consider whether to listen to him now.

Who has their facts straight, now?

In case you did not get my sarcasm. I am admitting I messed up that.

rabbit8 wrote:This is a post by Golden in response to Zomba.

Golden wrote:I'm actually feeling fairly good about both you and lizkeen now.

This is SVSs next post.

S~V~S wrote:

Zombarella wrote:I am going to vote for A Person right now. I don't want to lynch another active civ player, I'm going to go for someone who the baddies won't NK - either because he/she is one of them or because he/she is not playing and isn't a threat to them.

*votes A Person*

Low posters?

Do you have any actual suspicions? When you came in last night you tried pushing a suspicion of me, and it didn't take; do you suspect anyone?

I trust Golden's judgment; had I listened to him earlier, I would have backed off of BF. I am going to reread this AM and consider whether to listen to him now.

Who has their facts straight, now?

Yeah, that's what i said. Golden got me to think she was a civvie. I spent the entire night before arguing with her, and my first pst that morning was going after her, then I read the conversation with her, Golden & Liz. And decided to reread. Golden made me reconsider. Yup. Thats the fact.

S~V~S wrote:

rabbit8 wrote:Yes, you did try to save Zomba after you went after and got Golden to believe she was a civve then you changed your mind, convenient.

Because the Celestials have BTSC and are team who would obviously try to help the civvies in this game, why are you playing dumb?

Go back and reread, dear. Golden got me to thin she was a civvie.

Get your facts straight before you say these things

And I am not playing dumb~ but helping the civvies =/=being the civvies. The baddies have to outnumber the civs & Celestials. lots more civs than Celestials, and the baddies know everyone not them. So I am not the one playing dumb.

You guys are hilarious. Again, I don't have any info. I have a case, nothing more. At this point, I'm pretty sure I'm right. I don't have an official rolecheck, or special abilities that helped me foster this suspicion of Epig... I had facts instead. And I had Epig's actions. That was the original. Then Epig reacts by saying I must have info and furthermore it could be wrong in one of three ways. I don't really understand how that actually makes him looks less guilty to S~V~S, it has the opposite effect on me.

Then Epig puts forth a suggestion that simultaneously smells like a role hint and tastes like a Zomba save in the biggest kind of way.

Then Epig votes Vomps to tie the vote with Zombarella.

And someone suggested that Epig's baddie team might be trying to protect him by cursing him. Well, you don't have to actually have a curse used on you to hide behind a language limitation. (Although I realize it's real this time )

The only "info" involved there was put forth by Epignosis, and it seems like whatever he intended to do with that, has worked. There's no core element that can be erroneous in one of three ways, it's just baddie behaviour. I called him out on it during the MM lynch, and his reactions since then have only made me more confident.

Do you think Vomps is a civ?

S~V~S wrote:

Metalmarsh89 wrote:

rabbit8 wrote:OK. I don't really care about you as a baddie target. All the civvies and Celestials are targets. It should be easier for the BTSC team to find baddies.

But you don't seem to care whether Golden was in the BTSC group or not or for who he wanted to lynch.

I'm trying to point out that perhaps he was onto something.

yeah, and he trusted Zomba, too so

Whats your case? I want to hear it.

I'm losing the motivation to make a case right now. I've already made two (on other players) this game to no avail. And my ideas here keep getting stomped on.

I still think Epignosis is bad and that we should lynch him.

Long Con wrote:You guys are hilarious. Again, I don't have any info. I have a case, nothing more. At this point, I'm pretty sure I'm right. I don't have an official rolecheck, or special abilities that helped me foster this suspicion of Epig... I had facts instead. And I had Epig's actions. That was the original. Then Epig reacts by saying I must have info and furthermore it could be wrong in one of three ways. I don't really understand how that actually makes him looks less guilty to S~V~S, it has the opposite effect on me.

Then Epig puts forth a suggestion that simultaneously smells like a role hint and tastes like a Zomba save in the biggest kind of way.

Then Epig votes Vomps to tie the vote with Zombarella.

And someone suggested that Epig's baddie team might be trying to protect him by cursing him. Well, you don't have to actually have a curse used on you to hide behind a language limitation. (Although I realize it's real this time )

The only "info" involved there was put forth by Epignosis, and it seems like whatever he intended to do with that, has worked. There's no core element that can be erroneous in one of three ways, it's just baddie behaviour. I called him out on it during the MM lynch, and his reactions since then have only made me more confident.

And should you really chase so hard
The truth of sport plays rings around you

SVS that's what I said....You went after Zomba, When Golden decided she was a civvie you backed off hard.

I said it that night I thought it was not cool to back off.

rabbit8 wrote:

S~V~S wrote:Changing ones mind does not make one bad.

I don't like your reasoning for changing your mind.......

This makes me think you knew Zomba was on the hot seat so why not get her lynched. When you saw Golden turning the tide you backed off Zomba.

Metalmarsh89 wrote:I'm losing the motivation to make a case right now. I've already made two (on other players) this game to no avail. And my ideas here keep getting stomped on.

I still think Epignosis is bad and that we should lynch him.

Sol, Dhoop
Sun
Ilios
Naytheet
Ah Kin
Saule
Tonatiuh
Qurax
Gunes, Grian
Surie
Ir
Samse

Metalmarsh89 wrote:

S~V~S wrote:

Metalmarsh89 wrote:

rabbit8 wrote:OK. I don't really care about you as a baddie target. All the civvies and Celestials are targets. It should be easier for the BTSC team to find baddies.

But you don't seem to care whether Golden was in the BTSC group or not or for who he wanted to lynch.

I'm trying to point out that perhaps he was onto something.

yeah, and he trusted Zomba, too so

Whats your case? I want to hear it.

I'm losing the motivation to make a case right now. I've already made two (on other players) this game to no avail. And my ideas here keep getting stomped on.

I still think Epignosis is bad and that we should lynch him.

You have promised a case, I am disappoint. i was hoping you might convince me where LC did not. And this one might get received better as more people seem to agree with it.

Walking the dog. bbl

Linki, no Rabbit, i decided to give her the BOTD becasue had I listened to Golden about BF, we would not have lynched him. So in fur=ture, i will listen to Golden re BF. Re others, maybe not so much. You are trying to make these nothings into something, but i have been pretty transparent cause I have nothing to hide. i have been VERY transparent.

Epignosis wrote:

Metalmarsh89 wrote:I'm losing the motivation to make a case right now. I've already made two (on other players) this game to no avail. And my ideas here keep getting stomped on.

I still think Epignosis is bad and that we should lynch him.

Sol, Dhoop
Sun
Ilios
Naytheet
Ah Kin
Saule
Tonatiuh
Qurax
Gunes, Grian
Surie
Ir
Samse

Yes please. I'll have what he's having.

The entire game is about turning nothing into something. Thats how you find baddies.

Transparent ,in mafia. Give me a break

S~V~S wrote:

Metalmarsh89 wrote:

S~V~S wrote:

Metalmarsh89 wrote:

rabbit8 wrote:OK. I don't really care about you as a baddie target. All the civvies and Celestials are targets. It should be easier for the BTSC team to find baddies.

But you don't seem to care whether Golden was in the BTSC group or not or for who he wanted to lynch.

I'm trying to point out that perhaps he was onto something.

yeah, and he trusted Zomba, too so

Whats your case? I want to hear it.

I'm losing the motivation to make a case right now. I've already made two (on other players) this game to no avail. And my ideas here keep getting stomped on.

I still think Epignosis is bad and that we should lynch him.

You have promised a case, I am disappoint. i was hoping you might convince me where LC did not. And this one might get received better as more people seem to agree with it.

Walking the dog. bbl

Linki, no Rabbit, i decided to give her the BOTD becasue had I listened to Golden about BF, we would not have lynched him. So in fur=ture, i will listen to Golden re BF. Re others, maybe not so much. You are trying to make these nothings into something, but i have been pretty transparent cause I have nothing to hide. i have been VERY transparent.

Fan-freaking-tastic.

I make cases, I get ignored. I say I'll make a case and don't, I get disappointment. What do you care? You've been emphasizing all day that you won't vote for Epignosis, and you have shown a clear disintrest in changing your mind anyway.

So I'm giving you my honest opinion.


Why the heck did you vote Sophie anyway?

Metalmarsh89 wrote:

S~V~S wrote:

Metalmarsh89 wrote:

rabbit8 wrote:OK. I don't really care about you as a baddie target. All the civvies and Celestials are targets. It should be easier for the BTSC team to find baddies.

But you don't seem to care whether Golden was in the BTSC group or not or for who he wanted to lynch.

I'm trying to point out that perhaps he was onto something.

yeah, and he trusted Zomba, too so

Whats your case? I want to hear it.

I'm losing the motivation to make a case right now. I've already made two (on other players) this game to no avail. And my ideas here keep getting stomped on.

I still think Epignosis is bad and that we should lynch him.

What? I have been waiting for your thoughts.

MM, I'm still eager to hear your case. Even if you don't think it's worth it.

birdwithteeth11 wrote:MM, I'm still eager to hear your case. Even if you don't think it's worth it.

We must have waited all our lives for this
Moment

Metalmarsh I would also like to hear your case. If you dont feel like doing it tonight what about doing it early tomorrow.

Metalmarsh89 wrote:

S~V~S wrote:

Metalmarsh89 wrote:

S~V~S wrote:

Metalmarsh89 wrote:

rabbit8 wrote:OK. I don't really care about you as a baddie target. All the civvies and Celestials are targets. It should be easier for the BTSC team to find baddies.

But you don't seem to care whether Golden was in the BTSC group or not or for who he wanted to lynch.

I'm trying to point out that perhaps he was onto something.

yeah, and he trusted Zomba, too so

Whats your case? I want to hear it.

I'm losing the motivation to make a case right now. I've already made two (on other players) this game to no avail. And my ideas here keep getting stomped on.

I still think Epignosis is bad and that we should lynch him.

You have promised a case, I am disappoint. i was hoping you might convince me where LC did not. And this one might get received better as more people seem to agree with it.

Walking the dog. bbl

Linki, no Rabbit, i decided to give her the BOTD becasue had I listened to Golden about BF, we would not have lynched him. So in fur=ture, i will listen to Golden re BF. Re others, maybe not so much. You are trying to make these nothings into something, but i have been pretty transparent cause I have nothing to hide. i have been VERY transparent.

Fan-freaking-tastic.

I make cases, I get ignored. I say I'll make a case and don't, I get disappointment. What do you care? You've been emphasizing all day that you won't vote for Epignosis, and you have shown a clear disintrest in changing your mind anyway.

So I'm giving you my honest opinion.


Why the heck did you vote Sophie anyway?

You have repeatedly said you are making a case, I am not the only one out here; make it for them if you feel that strongly about it. Don;t get mad at me.

And i did not vote for Sophie. I voted for myself. I was trying to vote for sophie, though. Big fingers, small phone. She was acting like she acts when she is bad. Lots of games with her at RM made me think that. She much refers to be a civ, and is much more aggressive when shes a civ. that was what i thought I saw here. What pretty much everyone who has ever played with her thought they saw.

Epignosis wrote:

birdwithteeth11 wrote:MM, I'm still eager to hear your case. Even if you don't think it's worth it.

We must have waited all our lives for this
Moment

rabbit8 wrote:

Epignosis wrote:

birdwithteeth11 wrote:MM, I'm still eager to hear your case. Even if you don't think it's worth it.

We must have waited all our lives for this
Moment

I will try, I really will. I intended to do it when I got home from classes today. But I got caught up in the current discussion instead of doing that, and not only did I lose the will to make the case I promised as a result, but I've still got some IRL things to do tonight that I've procrastinated on. Anyway, when I get back from work in a couple hours, I will try to give you all something. If I don't, well sorry in advance.

Thank you for holding me accountable though.

Which means I should pick up some beer on the way home.

And S~V~S, you referenced my theory from way back closer to the beginning of the game than now. Theories change. I've been watching TH for a while now, and though I want to see how the Epig lynch turns out first, I've got some more fine theories to share with you about your trusted Turnip Head. Your reactions this very day have been very interesting as well, to be honest.

Turnip Head wrote:

Dom wrote:

Turnip Head wrote:

Dom wrote:TH, yesterday, you discussed my thoughts on Zomba and their evolution through the game-- why did you ignore what I said about her on Day 1?

All I really did yesterday was compare your early vote for Zomba with your early vote for DP. I didn't go through the evolution of your thoughts on Zomba, but since you brought it up, I have now done so. And you have remained incredibly consistent. I find most of your posts about Zomba to be matter of fact, flat in tone and delivery. "We should lynch Zomba", "Zomba is bad", while when you're discussing other topics, you take on a more conversational tone with a degree of uncertainty. I don't know exactly what to make of this, but one explanation is that you are Zomba's teammate and you threw her under the bus after her bad reaction to BF's post, and you never looked back. I do think it's interesting that you made no mention of Zomba on Day 2 when Epi and I came out with a case against MM. You went along with the MM case and didn't mention Zomba's name at all. Then on Day 3 you went right back to suspecting Zomba.

But okay Dom, you thought DP was bad. He likely wasn't. Now where do you look? Was the DP case really the only thing you had?

Long Con wrote:

juliets wrote:I have to do some back reading today before I can answer your question LC. Who is standing out for you beyond Epi?

I'm a bit suspicious of Turnip Head - I was thinking that if he has the Bottle, and the Bottle was in Epig's safe... there's not that many ways he could have gotten it. I don't think he's the Safe Cracker... so maybe he killed the Safe Cracker for it?

Really now, is that what you think?

TH, is LC wrong in that thinking?

LC is wrong, and furthermore I'm pretty sure he knows he is wrong.

So, you know who Luke is, then?

S~V~S wrote:Just feels. Doms opinions, suspicions and thoughts have seemed less civ to me than Epis, anf the fact that Dom has *felt* like a low poster, but makes lots of posts I don't even remember (when I love reading Doms posts)... I dunno. Feels. And maybe I am trying to convince myself, especially re the buddying; sometimes I start a post with one position, but I end it with another. I talk myself in and out of things all the time. But I don't see myself talking myself into lynching someone who can't defend, snarky as i think that defense might wind up being.

Paraphrase: "I suspect Dom because he said things"

That's about as specific as that got.

rabbit8 wrote:

S~V~S wrote:I am not blowing him off. I am not sure I trust him, either. His weird little stab in THs direction before was, well, weird. I base my votes on my own thoughts, although if someone posts things I agree with I will follow their case. If they don't, well, then i won't.

You did basically dismiss it and blow it off. It was weird.
TH is a civvie?

I am starting to doubt it tbh.

Long Con wrote:And S~V~S, you referenced my theory from way back closer to the beginning of the game than now. Theories change. I've been watching TH for a while now, and though I want to see how the Epig lynch turns out first, I've got some more fine theories to share with you about your trusted Turnip Head. Your reactions this very day have been very interesting as well, to be honest.

I'd be interested to hear what you have to say about Mr. Head.