Murder, Mayhem, and Mafia
https://www.mafiathesyndicate.com/
Off to drown my sorrows in Holy Water
. Looks like we will still be seeing your real self, GOD 
. Greenery influenced option sounds good to meGOD wrote:This was what made the LORB laugh the hardest the first time she saw this film:
"neither count to two, excepting that thou then proceed to three"
Although the LORB may have been under the influence of greenery at the time. It was a long time ago.
But "four thou shalt not count" is also pretty awesome. Now seriously a faux diety needs her beauty sleep
Voted.Well, maybe you all shouldn't have ignored my post.Long Con wrote: Is S~V~S God? Is God likely to be a Civvie role?
We should have lynched you instead.Long Con wrote:Well, maybe you all shouldn't have ignored my post.Long Con wrote: Is S~V~S God? Is God likely to be a Civvie role?
RIP, S~V~S, sorry I was after you for most of the game, I did back off when it was obvious you were God. I'm assuming the secret part of your role is something that led you to believe that Llama is bad. I promise to try again to lynch him in your holy name.
If you enjoy lynching Civvies! Try Llama instead. He's most likely a recruit.Metalmarsh89 wrote:We should have lynched you instead.Long Con wrote:Well, maybe you all shouldn't have ignored my post.Long Con wrote: Is S~V~S God? Is God likely to be a Civvie role?
RIP, S~V~S, sorry I was after you for most of the game, I did back off when it was obvious you were God. I'm assuming the secret part of your role is something that led you to believe that Llama is bad. I promise to try again to lynch him in your holy name.
Ok thanks. I have to think about this a bit.Long Con wrote:No change, my theory comes from the idea that he's got blind devotion to the idea he's a Civvie, and yet God insists very strongly that he is bad. Recruit makes sense.
The only idea I've thought of is that SVS was able to know who targeted her at night. And if llama targeted her with a certain kind of power, that might lead her to believe he is bad. I'll have to think on this though.Long Con wrote:No change, my theory comes from the idea that he's got blind devotion to the idea he's a Civvie, and yet God insists very strongly that he is bad. Recruit makes sense.
Herbert wrote:
Dennis wrote:Neutral? What does that even mean. Even Billy Graham had something to say about neutrality: "The most prominent place in hell is reserved for those who are neutral on the great issues of life." Just pick a side already!
Neutral? More like neutered, if you ask me. Never know which side that egg is going to flip onto, so don't shed a tear for her. That said, maybe LongCon would have been a better voting prospect for Day 5. That name in of itself is a bit telling, if you ask me!
And how come you never ask me, anyway? I'm a bit pissed off about that, frankly.
Probably because you just ramble on about oppression and the violence inherent in the system :PDennis wrote: And how come you never ask me, anyway? I'm a bit pissed off about that, frankly.
I said that already.Long Con wrote:Protip: Dennis doesn't know any more than the rest of us.
Given the way the conversation has been going, I find them quite a relief, actually.fingersplints wrote:RIP bwt ;(
I don't like the limited poll options, but I wasn't around to help with the competition anyways so I guess I can't complain too much about being on the losing side.
birdwithteeth11 wrote:Also, DEATH TO THE HOSTS!!! THEY PERPETUATE THE VIOLENCE INHERENT IN THE SYSTEM!!!!!!
COME BACK HERE YOU! I'LL.....I'LL PECK YOUR EYES OUT!!!Roxy wrote:birdwithteeth11 wrote:Also, DEATH TO THE HOSTS!!! THEY PERPETUATE THE VIOLENCE INHERENT IN THE SYSTEM!!!!!!
I was around, but I didn't perform very well.fingersplints wrote:RIP bwt ;(
I don't like the limited poll options, but I wasn't around to help with the competition anyways so I guess I can't complain too much about being on the losing side.
Yes, very timely! Congrats on the win.thellama73 wrote:Given the way the conversation has been going, I find them quite a relief, actually.fingersplints wrote:RIP bwt ;(
I don't like the limited poll options, but I wasn't around to help with the competition anyways so I guess I can't complain too much about being on the losing side.
Thank you. You are most kind.Long Con wrote:Yes, very timely! Congrats on the win.thellama73 wrote:Given the way the conversation has been going, I find them quite a relief, actually.fingersplints wrote:RIP bwt ;(
I don't like the limited poll options, but I wasn't around to help with the competition anyways so I guess I can't complain too much about being on the losing side.
Seems like a reasonable plan. Based on today's poll I think I'm going to revisit my suspicions of JC and MM and probably vote for one of them unless something else comes up.thellama73 wrote: I have to admit, as suspicious as I find you. I am fairly tempted to go after a quiet person this time, because I feel like the baddies are letting the noisy people kill each other while they stay silent. After Made and SVS, I am nervous about lynching another very active, high posting player.
I've stated before why. Partly the French comment, and even more your reactions to being called out for it. Also, your comment about knowing soon enough about Epi.Metalmarsh89 wrote:My vote is going on LoRab for now, at least until he/she tells me why he/she is suspicious of me.
I knew someone had brought up juliets before and I couldn't remember if it was you or bwt, but I was trying to find it again last lynch to revisit those points on her. I'm undecided on MM. Sometimes I think he is making a lot of sense. Other times I feel he is being blendy and is reminding me of how he played in the Hobbit. I too want to look closer at him.Bullzeye wrote:Seems like a reasonable plan. Based on today's poll I think I'm going to revisit my suspicions of JC and MM and probably vote for one of them unless something else comes up.thellama73 wrote: I have to admit, as suspicious as I find you. I am fairly tempted to go after a quiet person this time, because I feel like the baddies are letting the noisy people kill each other while they stay silent. After Made and SVS, I am nervous about lynching another very active, high posting player.
I never said I was suspicious of you. It was merely a pressure vote.LoRab wrote:I've stated before why. Partly the French comment, and even more your reactions to being called out for it. Also, your comment about knowing soon enough about Epi.Metalmarsh89 wrote:My vote is going on LoRab for now, at least until he/she tells me why he/she is suspicious of me.
In retrospect, you've also had some odd posts about baddies and BTSC and whether they have it or not (it's come up a couple of different times in your comments), which just raises my eyebrow.
Also: she.
And is there any reason you suspect me other than the fact that I'm suspicious of you?
I've actually felt very unblendy this game, but if you insist. Look all you want, but no touching please.fingersplints wrote:I knew someone had brought up juliets before and I couldn't remember if it was you or bwt, but I was trying to find it again last lynch to revisit those points on her. I'm undecided on MM. Sometimes I think he is making a lot of sense. Other times I feel he is being blendy and is reminding me of how he played in the Hobbit. I too want to look closer at him.Bullzeye wrote:Seems like a reasonable plan. Based on today's poll I think I'm going to revisit my suspicions of JC and MM and probably vote for one of them unless something else comes up.thellama73 wrote: I have to admit, as suspicious as I find you. I am fairly tempted to go after a quiet person this time, because I feel like the baddies are letting the noisy people kill each other while they stay silent. After Made and SVS, I am nervous about lynching another very active, high posting player.
I brought up a few points on JC originally during the course of I think day one? If you search my posts you should find my case on her fairly easily, and I've discussed her quite a bit. As far as MM is concerned, I have more of a gut feeling than anything else. A handful of things he's said have really caught my eye. I particularly can't get over the 'French' comment from a while back.fingersplints wrote:I knew someone had brought up juliets before and I couldn't remember if it was you or bwt, but I was trying to find it again last lynch to revisit those points on her. I'm undecided on MM. Sometimes I think he is making a lot of sense. Other times I feel he is being blendy and is reminding me of how he played in the Hobbit. I too want to look closer at him.Bullzeye wrote:Seems like a reasonable plan. Based on today's poll I think I'm going to revisit my suspicions of JC and MM and probably vote for one of them unless something else comes up.thellama73 wrote: I have to admit, as suspicious as I find you. I am fairly tempted to go after a quiet person this time, because I feel like the baddies are letting the noisy people kill each other while they stay silent. After Made and SVS, I am nervous about lynching another very active, high posting player.
And tell me what is so darn fishy about it.
I had Juliets as a suspicion earlier, and I let it go for a bit because she made a good defense. I did not drop it, I just didn't pursue it for a bit. I'll have to recall what the suspicion was based on... More of a hassle at the moment though, because my computer is out of commission for now, and I'm permaphone guy.fingersplints wrote:I knew someone had brought up juliets before and I couldn't remember if it was you or bwt, but I was trying to find it again last lynch to revisit those points on her. I'm undecided on MM. Sometimes I think he is making a lot of sense. Other times I feel he is being blendy and is reminding me of how he played in the Hobbit. I too want to look closer at him.Bullzeye wrote:Seems like a reasonable plan. Based on today's poll I think I'm going to revisit my suspicions of JC and MM and probably vote for one of them unless something else comes up.thellama73 wrote: I have to admit, as suspicious as I find you. I am fairly tempted to go after a quiet person this time, because I feel like the baddies are letting the noisy people kill each other while they stay silent. After Made and SVS, I am nervous about lynching another very active, high posting player.
I've explained it at least once already but I'll happily do so again. It seemed very strange to me, catching up on the thread that morning, that in a game where we don't know any (other than the dead) roles and where the only baddie revealed had no connection to the French, your 'joke' accusation hinged upon there being a baddie team comprised of French roles. It felt like a slip, if I'm honest. Like you accidentally let on that you knew something a civ wouldn't. I can't get over it.Metalmarsh89 wrote:Okay, let's discuss my comment about the French again, shall we? Here is the important parts.
And tell me what is so darn fishy about it.
So you voted for me in the early hours of the poll because you don't suspect me? What does pressure vote even mean? Anyway, in response:Metalmarsh89 wrote:I never said I was suspicious of you. It was merely a pressure vote.LoRab wrote:I've stated before why. Partly the French comment, and even more your reactions to being called out for it. Also, your comment about knowing soon enough about Epi.Metalmarsh89 wrote:My vote is going on LoRab for now, at least until he/she tells me why he/she is suspicious of me.
In retrospect, you've also had some odd posts about baddies and BTSC and whether they have it or not (it's come up a couple of different times in your comments), which just raises my eyebrow.
Also: she.
And is there any reason you suspect me other than the fact that I'm suspicious of you?
But how convenient of llama to decid to vote a quiet player moments after I voted you, who happens to be a quiet player.
