The Syndicate

Posted: **Wed May 02, 2018 2:39 pm**

You can't exactly ask someone to NOT put themselves on the team. I'd have done the same thing.

[VOTE: Approve] aubergine

linki: I echo the que

Posted: **Wed May 02, 2018 2:39 pm**

[VOTE: disapprove] aubergine
Not terrible reasoning to include yourself, but I only really want to vote for the same mission currently.
I’d be fine adding you as the 5th if we get a clean guilty verdict on M2 tho

Posted: **Wed May 02, 2018 2:41 pm**

Scotty wrote: ↑Wed May 02, 2018 2:39 pm Not terrible reasoning to include yourself, but I only really want to vote for the same mission currently.

Not gonna happen unless we wait for someone on the first mission to come up. Which would be you.

I know you can't change your vote at this point, but I think this is okay.

Posted: **Wed May 02, 2018 2:41 pm**

speedchuck wrote: ↑Wed May 02, 2018 2:39 pm You can't exactly ask someone to NOT put themselves on the team. I'd have done the same thing.

[VOTE: Approve] aubergine

linki: I echo the que

Nah, I probably would have done the first mission even if I wasn’t on it. Not to say that it’s bad reasoning, because his reasoning makes sense.

You go, glen coco

Posted: **Wed May 02, 2018 2:42 pm**

Scotty wrote: ↑Wed May 02, 2018 2:39 pm [VOTE: disapprove] aubergine
Not terrible reasoning to include yourself, but I only really want to vote for the same mission currently.
I’d be fine adding you as the 5th if we get a clean guilty verdict on M2 tho

QUEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE?!??!?!?!?!?!?!?!

Posted: **Wed May 02, 2018 2:43 pm**

speedchuck wrote: ↑Wed May 02, 2018 2:41 pm
Scotty wrote: ↑Wed May 02, 2018 2:39 pm Not terrible reasoning to include yourself, but I only really want to vote for the same mission currently.
Not gonna happen unless we wait for someone on the first mission to come up. Which would be you.

I know you can't change your vote at this point, but I think this is okay.

It’s putting yourself in a box to always include yourself on missions. I guess I might just be jaded but some of the missions we put forth in Avalon would make any sane person think we have squirrel brains

Posted: **Wed May 02, 2018 2:43 pm**

DharmaHelper wrote: ↑Wed May 02, 2018 2:42 pm
Scotty wrote: ↑Wed May 02, 2018 2:39 pm [VOTE: disapprove] aubergine
Not terrible reasoning to include yourself, but I only really want to vote for the same mission currently.
I’d be fine adding you as the 5th if we get a clean guilty verdict on M2 tho
QUEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE?!??!?!?!?!?!?!?!

Can I help you?

Posted: **Wed May 02, 2018 2:44 pm**

That's 3 approves, 2 disapproves.

I've already voted, so I guess I can ignore this for now. GL.

linki:

I like boxes.

Posted: **Wed May 02, 2018 2:45 pm**

Scotty wrote: ↑Wed May 02, 2018 2:43 pm
DharmaHelper wrote: ↑Wed May 02, 2018 2:42 pm
Scotty wrote: ↑Wed May 02, 2018 2:39 pm [VOTE: disapprove] aubergine
Not terrible reasoning to include yourself, but I only really want to vote for the same mission currently.
I’d be fine adding you as the 5th if we get a clean guilty verdict on M2 tho
QUEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE?!??!?!?!?!?!?!?!
Can I help you?

No I don't think you can.

FWIW Running the "same team" would have been my preference by a smidge, but I also think its important to see how other people perform on teams.

Posted: **Wed May 02, 2018 2:50 pm**

DharmaHelper wrote: ↑Wed May 02, 2018 2:45 pm
Scotty wrote: ↑Wed May 02, 2018 2:43 pm
DharmaHelper wrote: ↑Wed May 02, 2018 2:42 pm
Scotty wrote: ↑Wed May 02, 2018 2:39 pm [VOTE: disapprove] aubergine
Not terrible reasoning to include yourself, but I only really want to vote for the same mission currently.
I’d be fine adding you as the 5th if we get a clean guilty verdict on M2 tho
QUEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE?!??!?!?!?!?!?!?!
Can I help you?
No I don't think you can.

FWIW Running the "same team" would have been my preference by a smidge, but I also think its important to see how other people perform on teams.

I agree with this should the 2nd identical mission have a not-guilty. I have no current reason to believe anyone is bad in Daisy, Mp and edjou. Yet.

Posted: **Wed May 02, 2018 2:52 pm**

Scotty wrote: ↑Wed May 02, 2018 2:50 pm
DharmaHelper wrote: ↑Wed May 02, 2018 2:45 pm
Scotty wrote: ↑Wed May 02, 2018 2:43 pm
DharmaHelper wrote: ↑Wed May 02, 2018 2:42 pm
Scotty wrote: ↑Wed May 02, 2018 2:39 pm [VOTE: disapprove] aubergine
Not terrible reasoning to include yourself, but I only really want to vote for the same mission currently.
I’d be fine adding you as the 5th if we get a clean guilty verdict on M2 tho
QUEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE?!??!?!?!?!?!?!?!
Can I help you?
No I don't think you can.

FWIW Running the "same team" would have been my preference by a smidge, but I also think its important to see how other people perform on teams.
I agree with this should the 2nd identical mission have a not-guilty. I have no current reason to believe anyone is bad in Daisy, Mp and edjou. Yet.

I agree with this, unless I don't. In which case, you're wrong, unless you're correct.

Posted: **Wed May 02, 2018 2:55 pm**

[VOTE: Approve] aubergine

I’m not as magnanimous as scotty. I’d be adding myself anyway. May as well see how this team performs. I wouldn’t have removed ed though - if he’s bad and the plan for the baddies was to pass the first jury, I bet he’d include more than just one baddie to seed it well. I think he’s the most likely of the four to be town.

Never mind though, let’s see how this one goes.

Posted: **Wed May 02, 2018 2:55 pm**

speedchuck wrote: ↑Wed May 02, 2018 2:44 pm That's 3 approves, 2 disapproves.

I've already voted, so I guess I can ignore this for now. GL.

linki: I like boxes.

Posted: **Wed May 02, 2018 2:55 pm**

Oops forgot to vote.

[VOTE: approve] aubergine

Posted: **Wed May 02, 2018 2:56 pm**

Golden wrote: ↑Wed May 02, 2018 2:55 pm [VOTE: Approve] aubergine

I’m not as magnanimous as scotty. I’d be adding myself anyway. May as well see how this team performs. I wouldn’t have removed ed though - if he’s bad and the plan for the baddies was to pass the first jury, I bet he’d include more than just one baddie to seed it well. I think he’s the most likely of the four to be town.

Never mind though, let’s see how this one goes.

Most likely? What am I, chopped lover?

Posted: **Wed May 02, 2018 2:57 pm**

Scotty wrote: ↑Wed May 02, 2018 2:56 pm
Golden wrote: ↑Wed May 02, 2018 2:55 pm [VOTE: Approve] aubergine

I’m not as magnanimous as scotty. I’d be adding myself anyway. May as well see how this team performs. I wouldn’t have removed ed though - if he’s bad and the plan for the baddies was to pass the first jury, I bet he’d include more than just one baddie to seed it well. I think he’s the most likely of the four to be town.

Never mind though, let’s see how this one goes.
Most likely? What am I, chopped lover?

Liver

Posted: **Wed May 02, 2018 2:58 pm**

Scotty wrote: ↑Wed May 02, 2018 2:57 pm
Scotty wrote: ↑Wed May 02, 2018 2:56 pm
Golden wrote: ↑Wed May 02, 2018 2:55 pm [VOTE: Approve] aubergine

I’m not as magnanimous as scotty. I’d be adding myself anyway. May as well see how this team performs. I wouldn’t have removed ed though - if he’s bad and the plan for the baddies was to pass the first jury, I bet he’d include more than just one baddie to seed it well. I think he’s the most likely of the four to be town.

Never mind though, let’s see how this one goes.
Most likely? What am I, chopped lover?
Liver

In your line of work, you’re way more likely to be chopped lover than chopped liver.

Posted: **Wed May 02, 2018 2:58 pm**

Posted: **Wed May 02, 2018 3:29 pm**

[VOTE: approve] aubergine

Posted: **Wed May 02, 2018 3:33 pm**

[VOTE: APPROVE ] aubergine

Posted: **Wed May 02, 2018 3:39 pm**

Apologies to INH and my fellow players for not being involved here; I've had an insane 72 hours to say the least. I'll be around more going forward.

Posted: **Wed May 02, 2018 3:40 pm**

DisgruntledPorcupine wrote: ↑Wed May 02, 2018 2:32 pm I will put the same people up as the ones that got a good result, subbing myself in for one person (EdJou). I agree with the thought that messing around with it too much is no more likely to pass, so I'll just sub myself in since I know I'm on the good side. Not a great reason for my choice in subbing out, I just feel OK about Scotty and Daisy being on there still and want to see what happens if MP is around to vote.

DisgruntledPorcupine
M Plus 7
Scotty
Spacedaisy

Approving this because it includes me.

[VOTE: APPROVE] aubergine

Posted: **Wed May 02, 2018 3:41 pm**

M Plus 7 wrote: ↑Wed May 02, 2018 3:39 pm Apologies to INH and my fellow players for not being involved here; I've had an insane 72 hours to say the least. I'll be around more going forward.

Apology not accepted.

Posted: **Wed May 02, 2018 3:44 pm**

DharmaHelper wrote: ↑Wed May 02, 2018 3:41 pm
M Plus 7 wrote: ↑Wed May 02, 2018 3:39 pm Apologies to INH and my fellow players for not being involved here; I've had an insane 72 hours to say the least. I'll be around more going forward.
Apology not accepted.

Good to see you too.

Posted: **Wed May 02, 2018 4:00 pm**

DISGRUNTLEDPORCUPINE'S PROPOSED JURY:
DisgruntledPorcupine
M Plus 7
Scotty
Spacedaisy

Approve: Spacedaisy, Dharmahelper, Speedchuck, Golden, DisgruntledPorcupine, Nutella, EdJou, M Plus 7
Disapprove: Lunalee, Scotty

That's one more "Approve" than a majority, so DisgruntledPorcupine's Jury passes.

Posted: **Wed May 02, 2018 4:02 pm**

TRIAL #2

[mention]DisgruntledPorcupine[/mention], [mention]M Plus 7[/mention], [mention]Scotty[/mention], and [mention]Spacedaisy[/mention]

The four of you have until 3:00 AM CST tomorrow to PM me either a "Guilty" or "Not Guilty" vote. If there is even one "Not Guilty" vote, the trial will result in a Not Guilty verdict. When I have received all the votes, I will announce the verdict. How each individual player voted will not be revealed. Once the verdict is revealed, [mention]Golden[/mention] may propose a jury for the third trial.

Posted: **Wed May 02, 2018 4:10 pm**

Whoa that was quick and easy.

Posted: **Wed May 02, 2018 4:22 pm**

Almost too easy. Now I'm concerned.

Posted: **Wed May 02, 2018 4:27 pm**

Spacedaisy wrote: ↑Wed May 02, 2018 4:22 pm Almost too easy. Now I'm concerned.

Then why did you vote to approve?

Posted: **Wed May 02, 2018 4:29 pm**

Scotty wrote: ↑Wed May 02, 2018 4:27 pm
Spacedaisy wrote: ↑Wed May 02, 2018 4:22 pm Almost too easy. Now I'm concerned.
Then why did you vote to approve?

SEEMS LIKE RUSHING INTO THINGS MAY HAVE BEEN A BAD

*chokes to death and dies*

Posted: **Wed May 02, 2018 4:31 pm**

Spacedaisy wrote: ↑Wed May 02, 2018 4:22 pm Almost too easy. Now I'm concerned.

Right? And Scotty and I were the only skeptics. I really doubt it will pass.

Posted: **Wed May 02, 2018 4:37 pm**

TRIAL #2 RESULT

VERDICT: GUILTY

[mention]Golden[/mention], please propose a jury of five people for the third trial.

Posted: **Wed May 02, 2018 4:39 pm**

Schniggity diggity.

Posted: **Wed May 02, 2018 4:39 pm**

From now on any team with Daisy in it I will reject..

Posted: **Wed May 02, 2018 4:40 pm**

Awesome.

Posted: **Wed May 02, 2018 4:40 pm**

insertnamehere wrote: ↑Wed May 02, 2018 4:37 pm
TRIAL #2 RESULT

VERDICT: GUILTY

@Golden, please propose a jury for the third trial.

But seriously guys, we might actually have a chance here!

Posted: **Wed May 02, 2018 4:43 pm**

DharmaHelper wrote: ↑Wed May 02, 2018 4:39 pm From now on any team with Daisy in it I will reject..

You're not making any sense here. Daisy was just in two missions that PASSED. Guilty verdict = good. If she were scum, she really should have failed that second one with a "not guilty," and blamed it on a new-comer to the team.

Posted: **Wed May 02, 2018 4:44 pm**

Lunalee wrote: ↑Wed May 02, 2018 4:40 pm
insertnamehere wrote: ↑Wed May 02, 2018 4:37 pm
TRIAL #2 RESULT

VERDICT: GUILTY

@Golden, please propose a jury for the third trial.

But seriously guys, we might actually have a chance here!

To cut to the quick here, I would have been majorly surprised to see a fail in the first two rounds, particularly after the first round went well and the team remained mostly the same. DP isn't going to fail if he's the only difference, and nobody else would fail because they want to be on the 5 person teams and such.

Posted: **Wed May 02, 2018 4:45 pm**

Lunalee wrote: ↑Wed May 02, 2018 4:43 pm
DharmaHelper wrote: ↑Wed May 02, 2018 4:39 pm From now on any team with Daisy in it I will reject..
You're not making any sense here. Daisy was just in two missions that PASSED. Guilty verdict = good. If she were scum, she really should have failed that second one with a "not guilty," and blamed it on a new-comer to the team.

Nah. Look at her reaction in the thread. Why as Scotty said, approve a team you didn't feel comfortable with and then bring that discomfort up? Long Game shit.

Posted: **Wed May 02, 2018 4:46 pm**

We need five for the next trial. Might I suggest a superset of the first two passed missions? Hmmm?

Posted: **Wed May 02, 2018 4:46 pm**

Golden
EdJou
M Plus 7
Scotty
Spacedaisy

Posted: **Wed May 02, 2018 4:47 pm**

Also, do I get to vote on my own jury?

Posted: **Wed May 02, 2018 4:47 pm**

Scotty wrote: ↑Wed May 02, 2018 4:27 pm
Spacedaisy wrote: ↑Wed May 02, 2018 4:22 pm Almost too easy. Now I'm concerned.
Then why did you vote to approve?

Because I liked the look of DP and that was the only change to the previous team that got the Guilty verdict. Also I was in it.

Looks like my concerns were unfounded though. Well done.

Posted: **Wed May 02, 2018 4:47 pm**

You do

Posted: **Wed May 02, 2018 4:48 pm**

Golden wrote: ↑Wed May 02, 2018 4:47 pm Also, do I get to vote on my own jury?

Yep.

Posted: **Wed May 02, 2018 4:48 pm**

[VOTE: approve] aubergine

Posted: **Wed May 02, 2018 4:48 pm**

[VOTE: Approve] aubergine

Posted: **Wed May 02, 2018 4:48 pm**

[VOTE: approve] aubergine

Posted: **Wed May 02, 2018 4:49 pm**

Golden wrote: ↑Wed May 02, 2018 4:46 pm Golden
EdJou
M Plus 7
Scotty
Spacedaisy

Cool Prank

Posted: **Wed May 02, 2018 5:05 pm**

[VOTE: approve] aubergine

The Syndicate

ROUND TWO ☒ JURY GAME

Re: ROUND TWO ☒ JURY GAME

Re: ROUND TWO ☒ JURY GAME

Re: ROUND TWO ☒ JURY GAME

Re: ROUND TWO ☒ JURY GAME

Re: ROUND TWO ☒ JURY GAME

Re: ROUND TWO ☒ JURY GAME

Re: ROUND TWO ☒ JURY GAME

Re: ROUND TWO ☒ JURY GAME

Re: ROUND TWO ☒ JURY GAME

Re: ROUND TWO ☒ JURY GAME

Re: ROUND TWO ☒ JURY GAME

Re: ROUND TWO ☒ JURY GAME

Re: ROUND TWO ☒ JURY GAME

Re: ROUND TWO ☒ JURY GAME

Re: ROUND TWO ☒ JURY GAME

Re: ROUND TWO ☒ JURY GAME

Re: ROUND TWO ☒ JURY GAME

Re: ROUND TWO ☒ JURY GAME

Re: ROUND TWO ☒ JURY GAME

Re: ROUND TWO ☒ JURY GAME

Re: ROUND TWO ☒ JURY GAME

Re: ROUND TWO ☒ JURY GAME

Re: ROUND TWO ☒ JURY GAME

Re: ROUND TWO ☒ JURY GAME

Re: ROUND TWO ☒ JURY GAME

Re: ROUND TWO ☒ JURY GAME

Re: ROUND TWO ☒ JURY GAME

Re: ROUND TWO ☒ JURY GAME

Re: ROUND TWO ☒ JURY GAME

Re: ROUND TWO ☒ JURY GAME

Re: ROUND TWO ☒ JURY GAME

Re: ROUND TWO ☒ JURY GAME

Re: ROUND TWO ☒ JURY GAME

Re: ROUND TWO ☒ JURY GAME

Re: ROUND TWO ☒ JURY GAME

Re: ROUND TWO ☒ JURY GAME

Re: ROUND TWO ☒ JURY GAME

Re: ROUND TWO ☒ JURY GAME

Re: ROUND TWO ☒ JURY GAME

Re: ROUND TWO ☒ JURY GAME

Re: ROUND TWO ☒ JURY GAME

Re: ROUND TWO ☒ JURY GAME

Re: ROUND TWO ☒ JURY GAME

Re: ROUND TWO ☒ JURY GAME

Re: ROUND TWO ☒ JURY GAME

Re: ROUND TWO ☒ JURY GAME

Re: ROUND TWO ☒ JURY GAME

Re: ROUND TWO ☒ JURY GAME

Re: ROUND TWO ☒ JURY GAME

Re: ROUND TWO ☒ JURY GAME