The Syndicate

Posted: **Sun Feb 28, 2021 9:53 pm**

Sloonei wrote: ↑Sun Feb 28, 2021 9:50 pm
Esooa wrote: ↑Sun Feb 28, 2021 9:48 pm
Sloonei wrote: ↑Sun Feb 28, 2021 9:47 pm
Esooa wrote: ↑Sun Feb 28, 2021 9:46 pm
Sloonei wrote: ↑Sun Feb 28, 2021 9:46 pm
c4e5g3d5 wrote: ↑Sun Feb 28, 2021 9:44 pm
Sloonei wrote: ↑Sun Feb 28, 2021 9:42 pm spf is mafia, why does everyone stop talking whenever i bring this up?
Because you give us nothing to talk about.
A BIG OLD LINK TO NOTHING
I disagree with the post
Oh
is spf doing this something you think she would need to cognizantly replicate or just something she would do unintentionally?
I don't know. She could do it unintentionally, semi-intentionally, or fully intentionally.

My concern is twofold: A) it is something she has seen me do and earn town credit for in a high profile spot.
B) I do not feel like there was an organic reason for her to utilize that play at that moment.

well I'd argue two things

if spf is aware of you and minor facets of your playstyle to the degree she unintentionally replicates it, it's likely she would do the same as town too

and if it's something spf would need to consciously replicate, well I just don't think spf is someone who considers the player list and get play to that extent as scum because:

I believe she intends to not high effort this game

jess doesn't actively plan out what to do as scum

Posted: **Sun Feb 28, 2021 9:53 pm**

Sloonei wrote: ↑Sun Feb 28, 2021 9:50 pm
Esooa wrote: ↑Sun Feb 28, 2021 9:48 pm
Sloonei wrote: ↑Sun Feb 28, 2021 9:47 pm
Esooa wrote: ↑Sun Feb 28, 2021 9:46 pm
Sloonei wrote: ↑Sun Feb 28, 2021 9:46 pm
c4e5g3d5 wrote: ↑Sun Feb 28, 2021 9:44 pm
Sloonei wrote: ↑Sun Feb 28, 2021 9:42 pm spf is mafia, why does everyone stop talking whenever i bring this up?
Because you give us nothing to talk about.
A BIG OLD LINK TO NOTHING
I disagree with the post
Oh
is spf doing this something you think she would need to cognizantly replicate or just something she would do unintentionally?
I don't know. She could do it unintentionally, semi-intentionally, or fully intentionally.

My concern is twofold: A) it is something she has seen me do and earn town credit for in a high profile spot.
B) I do not feel like there was an organic reason for her to utilize that play at that moment.

I left this thought unfinished.

SPF doing that thing here suggests to me that she might be nervous about my perception of her in particular, and she did a thing that was designed purely to affect how I am reading her, as opposed to "generating content" or anything of that sort.

Her response to my prods on her motivation felt a bit clunky as well, but I haven't really dissected those words.

Posted: **Sun Feb 28, 2021 9:55 pm**

as for the "there wasn't an organic reason to do it"

I'm not so sure about that. Honestly, calling attention to your reads in such a way I almost always dislike; it just feels showy to be

but it's also something that I've seen come from town *at least* as often as scum

Posted: **Sun Feb 28, 2021 9:55 pm**

Sloonei wrote: ↑Sun Feb 28, 2021 9:51 pm
KZA wrote: ↑Sun Feb 28, 2021 9:49 pm
Sloonei wrote: ↑Sun Feb 28, 2021 9:46 pm
c4e5g3d5 wrote: ↑Sun Feb 28, 2021 9:44 pm
Sloonei wrote: ↑Sun Feb 28, 2021 9:42 pm spf is mafia, why does everyone stop talking whenever i bring this up?
Because you give us nothing to talk about.
A BIG OLD LINK TO NOTHING
that's just you talking about yourself
I'm very narcissistic, KZA.

Yeah I bet you love your name on that banner

[VOTE: Unvote] aubergine

on second thought it would be more interesting and productive to see what SPF has to say about your case

Posted: **Sun Feb 28, 2021 9:55 pm**

Esooa wrote: ↑Sun Feb 28, 2021 9:53 pm
Sloonei wrote: ↑Sun Feb 28, 2021 9:50 pm
Esooa wrote: ↑Sun Feb 28, 2021 9:48 pm
Sloonei wrote: ↑Sun Feb 28, 2021 9:47 pm
Esooa wrote: ↑Sun Feb 28, 2021 9:46 pm
Sloonei wrote: ↑Sun Feb 28, 2021 9:46 pm
c4e5g3d5 wrote: ↑Sun Feb 28, 2021 9:44 pm

Because you give us nothing to talk about.
A BIG OLD LINK TO NOTHING
I disagree with the post
Oh
is spf doing this something you think she would need to cognizantly replicate or just something she would do unintentionally?
I don't know. She could do it unintentionally, semi-intentionally, or fully intentionally.

My concern is twofold: A) it is something she has seen me do and earn town credit for in a high profile spot.
B) I do not feel like there was an organic reason for her to utilize that play at that moment.
well I'd argue two things

if spf is aware of you and minor facets of your playstyle to the degree she unintentionally replicates it, it's likely she would do the same as town too

and if it's something spf would need to consciously replicate, well I just don't think spf is someone who considers the player list and get play to that extent as scum because:

I believe she intends to not high effort this game

jess doesn't actively plan out what to do as scum

It is entirely possible that she is town. I have concerns that I'd like to pursue.

Posted: **Sun Feb 28, 2021 9:56 pm**

Esooa wrote: ↑Sun Feb 28, 2021 9:55 pm as for the "there wasn't an organic reason to do it"

I'm not so sure about that. Honestly, calling attention to your reads in such a way I almost always dislike; it just feels showy to be

but it's also something that I've seen come from town *at least* as often as scum

What is your motivation for pursuing this discussion to the extent that you are?

Posted: **Sun Feb 28, 2021 9:58 pm**

staypositivefriend wrote: ↑Sun Feb 28, 2021 7:59 pm
c4e5g3d5 wrote: ↑Sun Feb 28, 2021 7:57 pm
staypositivefriend wrote: ↑Sun Feb 28, 2021 7:55 pm
c4e5g3d5 wrote: ↑Sun Feb 28, 2021 7:49 pm Thread's asleep cmon.

@staypositivefriend
@Sloonei

Do you believe Grogu's claim?
sure
All that talk of trying extra hard huh.
hey now, i said that i was gonna low-effort :P

i think grogu claiming to be green is non-alignment indicative because it would be the easiest thing in the world to make up - it's not like he's claiming a role with specific or unique abilities. it's the equivalent of trying to read into someone that says: "i'm town", imo

but i think his tone is fine so far - even good

to be fair this read does concern me

spf knows grogu has good tone as scum, he showed that in spider verse mafia

so I don't know why she mentions this

Posted: **Sun Feb 28, 2021 9:58 pm**

Esooa wrote: ↑Sun Feb 28, 2021 9:45 pm let's be honest who here understands this game

This is super towny in a way that I might articulate after a good night's sleep but that you guys can probably vaguely see the angle behind.

Posted: **Sun Feb 28, 2021 10:00 pm**

Posted: **Sun Feb 28, 2021 10:01 pm**

Sloonei wrote: ↑Sun Feb 28, 2021 9:56 pm
Esooa wrote: ↑Sun Feb 28, 2021 9:55 pm as for the "there wasn't an organic reason to do it"

I'm not so sure about that. Honestly, calling attention to your reads in such a way I almost always dislike; it just feels showy to be

but it's also something that I've seen come from town *at least* as often as scum
What is your motivation for pursuing this discussion to the extent that you are?

the fact you literally asked for it

Posted: **Sun Feb 28, 2021 10:01 pm**

Sloonei wrote: ↑Sun Feb 28, 2021 9:56 pm
Esooa wrote: ↑Sun Feb 28, 2021 9:55 pm as for the "there wasn't an organic reason to do it"

I'm not so sure about that. Honestly, calling attention to your reads in such a way I almost always dislike; it just feels showy to be

but it's also something that I've seen come from town *at least* as often as scum
What is your motivation for pursuing this discussion to the extent that you are?

I have a theory: she doesn't like that I correctly called her out as scum, and is motivated to get discussion moving elsewhere, with her as the towny discussion motivator.

Posted: **Sun Feb 28, 2021 10:02 pm**

Long Con wrote: ↑Sun Feb 28, 2021 10:01 pm
Sloonei wrote: ↑Sun Feb 28, 2021 9:56 pm
Esooa wrote: ↑Sun Feb 28, 2021 9:55 pm as for the "there wasn't an organic reason to do it"

I'm not so sure about that. Honestly, calling attention to your reads in such a way I almost always dislike; it just feels showy to be

but it's also something that I've seen come from town *at least* as often as scum
What is your motivation for pursuing this discussion to the extent that you are?
I have a theory: she doesn't like that I correctly called her out as scum, and is motivated to get discussion moving elsewhere, with her as the towny discussion motivator.

you're right I had an interest in not talking about your read. Mostly because it was bad and annoying me

Posted: **Sun Feb 28, 2021 10:03 pm**

Long Con wrote: ↑Sun Feb 28, 2021 10:01 pm
Sloonei wrote: ↑Sun Feb 28, 2021 9:56 pm
Esooa wrote: ↑Sun Feb 28, 2021 9:55 pm as for the "there wasn't an organic reason to do it"

I'm not so sure about that. Honestly, calling attention to your reads in such a way I almost always dislike; it just feels showy to be

but it's also something that I've seen come from town *at least* as often as scum
What is your motivation for pursuing this discussion to the extent that you are?
I have a theory: she doesn't like that I correctly called her out as scum, and is motivated to get discussion moving elsewhere, with her as the towny discussion motivator.

My satire radar is in need of repair, I'll need some help here.

Posted: **Sun Feb 28, 2021 10:04 pm**

Esooa wrote: ↑Sun Feb 28, 2021 10:01 pm
Sloonei wrote: ↑Sun Feb 28, 2021 9:56 pm
Esooa wrote: ↑Sun Feb 28, 2021 9:55 pm as for the "there wasn't an organic reason to do it"

I'm not so sure about that. Honestly, calling attention to your reads in such a way I almost always dislike; it just feels showy to be

but it's also something that I've seen come from town *at least* as often as scum
What is your motivation for pursuing this discussion to the extent that you are?
the fact you literally asked for it

I am not criticizing you for engaging in discussion. I am asking what is motivating you. You have taken a stance that is distinctly defensive of SPF/critical of me. Why?

Posted: **Sun Feb 28, 2021 10:04 pm**

Esooa wrote: ↑Sun Feb 28, 2021 10:02 pm
Long Con wrote: ↑Sun Feb 28, 2021 10:01 pm
Sloonei wrote: ↑Sun Feb 28, 2021 9:56 pm
Esooa wrote: ↑Sun Feb 28, 2021 9:55 pm as for the "there wasn't an organic reason to do it"

I'm not so sure about that. Honestly, calling attention to your reads in such a way I almost always dislike; it just feels showy to be

but it's also something that I've seen come from town *at least* as often as scum
What is your motivation for pursuing this discussion to the extent that you are?
I have a theory: she doesn't like that I correctly called her out as scum, and is motivated to get discussion moving elsewhere, with her as the towny discussion motivator.
you're right I had an interest in not talking about your read. Mostly because it was bad and annoying me

Posted: **Sun Feb 28, 2021 10:05 pm**

c4e5g3d5 wrote: ↑Sun Feb 28, 2021 10:03 pm
Long Con wrote: ↑Sun Feb 28, 2021 10:01 pm
Sloonei wrote: ↑Sun Feb 28, 2021 9:56 pm
Esooa wrote: ↑Sun Feb 28, 2021 9:55 pm as for the "there wasn't an organic reason to do it"

I'm not so sure about that. Honestly, calling attention to your reads in such a way I almost always dislike; it just feels showy to be

but it's also something that I've seen come from town *at least* as often as scum
What is your motivation for pursuing this discussion to the extent that you are?
I have a theory: she doesn't like that I correctly called her out as scum, and is motivated to get discussion moving elsewhere, with her as the towny discussion motivator.
My satire radar is in need of repair, I'll need some help here.

This is the Documentary Channel, C3P0.

Posted: **Sun Feb 28, 2021 10:06 pm**

Sloonei wrote: ↑Sun Feb 28, 2021 10:04 pm
Esooa wrote: ↑Sun Feb 28, 2021 10:01 pm
Sloonei wrote: ↑Sun Feb 28, 2021 9:56 pm
Esooa wrote: ↑Sun Feb 28, 2021 9:55 pm as for the "there wasn't an organic reason to do it"

I'm not so sure about that. Honestly, calling attention to your reads in such a way I almost always dislike; it just feels showy to be

but it's also something that I've seen come from town *at least* as often as scum
What is your motivation for pursuing this discussion to the extent that you are?
the fact you literally asked for it
I am not criticizing you for engaging in discussion. I am asking what is motivating you. You have taken a stance that is distinctly defensive of SPF/critical of me. Why?

my motivation is the fact I wanna post in thread cause I like talking about mafia

you asked for discussion about your read, I disagreed with the read. I gave my reasons as to why

Posted: **Sun Feb 28, 2021 10:06 pm**

the scummiest thing spf has done is receive a distancing vote from c4

Posted: **Sun Feb 28, 2021 10:07 pm**

Long Con wrote: ↑Sun Feb 28, 2021 10:05 pm
c4e5g3d5 wrote: ↑Sun Feb 28, 2021 10:03 pm
Long Con wrote: ↑Sun Feb 28, 2021 10:01 pm
Sloonei wrote: ↑Sun Feb 28, 2021 9:56 pm
Esooa wrote: ↑Sun Feb 28, 2021 9:55 pm as for the "there wasn't an organic reason to do it"

I'm not so sure about that. Honestly, calling attention to your reads in such a way I almost always dislike; it just feels showy to be

but it's also something that I've seen come from town *at least* as often as scum
What is your motivation for pursuing this discussion to the extent that you are?
I have a theory: she doesn't like that I correctly called her out as scum, and is motivated to get discussion moving elsewhere, with her as the towny discussion motivator.
My satire radar is in need of repair, I'll need some help here.
This is the Documentary Channel, C3P0.

Well shit, now my satire radar is totaled.

Posted: **Sun Feb 28, 2021 10:08 pm**

Esooa wrote: ↑Sun Feb 28, 2021 10:06 pm
Sloonei wrote: ↑Sun Feb 28, 2021 10:04 pm
Esooa wrote: ↑Sun Feb 28, 2021 10:01 pm
Sloonei wrote: ↑Sun Feb 28, 2021 9:56 pm
Esooa wrote: ↑Sun Feb 28, 2021 9:55 pm as for the "there wasn't an organic reason to do it"

I'm not so sure about that. Honestly, calling attention to your reads in such a way I almost always dislike; it just feels showy to be

but it's also something that I've seen come from town *at least* as often as scum
What is your motivation for pursuing this discussion to the extent that you are?
the fact you literally asked for it
I am not criticizing you for engaging in discussion. I am asking what is motivating you. You have taken a stance that is distinctly defensive of SPF/critical of me. Why?
my motivation is the fact I wanna post in thread cause I like talking about mafia

you asked for discussion about your read, I disagreed with the read. I gave my reasons as to why

How do you read me right now?

Posted: **Sun Feb 28, 2021 10:08 pm**

Urist wrote: ↑Sun Feb 28, 2021 10:06 pm the scummiest thing spf has done is receive a distancing vote from c4

Said by someone not voting me

Posted: **Sun Feb 28, 2021 10:09 pm**

[VOTE: Esooa] aubergine

Posted: **Sun Feb 28, 2021 10:10 pm**

Sloonei wrote: ↑Sun Feb 28, 2021 10:08 pm
Esooa wrote: ↑Sun Feb 28, 2021 10:06 pm
Sloonei wrote: ↑Sun Feb 28, 2021 10:04 pm
Esooa wrote: ↑Sun Feb 28, 2021 10:01 pm
Sloonei wrote: ↑Sun Feb 28, 2021 9:56 pm
Esooa wrote: ↑Sun Feb 28, 2021 9:55 pm as for the "there wasn't an organic reason to do it"

I'm not so sure about that. Honestly, calling attention to your reads in such a way I almost always dislike; it just feels showy to be

but it's also something that I've seen come from town *at least* as often as scum
What is your motivation for pursuing this discussion to the extent that you are?
the fact you literally asked for it
I am not criticizing you for engaging in discussion. I am asking what is motivating you. You have taken a stance that is distinctly defensive of SPF/critical of me. Why?
my motivation is the fact I wanna post in thread cause I like talking about mafia

you asked for discussion about your read, I disagreed with the read. I gave my reasons as to why
How do you read me right now?

your read on LC is weird and I think he's very likely scum. Biggest reason is he immediately switched his posting style when I pointed out he was more serious than normal. You didn't explain your LC town read and I didn't like that

past that I still don't really get why you think the mason thing is towny

Posted: **Sun Feb 28, 2021 10:11 pm**

c4e5g3d5 wrote: ↑Sun Feb 28, 2021 10:08 pm
Urist wrote: ↑Sun Feb 28, 2021 10:06 pm the scummiest thing spf has done is receive a distancing vote from c4
Said by someone not voting me

that's not really relevant in a 26p game

Posted: **Sun Feb 28, 2021 10:11 pm**

Epignosis wrote: ↑Sun Feb 28, 2021 10:09 pm [VOTE: Esooa] aubergine

Anyone who wants to kill Esooa rn has to go through me first.

Posted: **Sun Feb 28, 2021 10:12 pm**

Esooa wrote: ↑Sun Feb 28, 2021 10:10 pm your read on LC is weird and I think he's very likely scum. Biggest reason is he immediately switched his posting style when I pointed out he was more serious than normal. You didn't explain your LC town read and I didn't like that

past that I still don't really get why you think the mason thing is towny

How seriously do you treat early-game reads?

Posted: **Sun Feb 28, 2021 10:12 pm**

Urist wrote: ↑Sun Feb 28, 2021 10:11 pm
c4e5g3d5 wrote: ↑Sun Feb 28, 2021 10:08 pm
Urist wrote: ↑Sun Feb 28, 2021 10:06 pm the scummiest thing spf has done is receive a distancing vote from c4
Said by someone not voting me
that's not really relevant in a 26p game

Sure, except you're voting the last possible person who could be partnered with me.

Posted: **Sun Feb 28, 2021 10:13 pm**

Sloonei wrote: ↑Sun Feb 28, 2021 10:12 pm
Esooa wrote: ↑Sun Feb 28, 2021 10:10 pm your read on LC is weird and I think he's very likely scum. Biggest reason is he immediately switched his posting style when I pointed out he was more serious than normal. You didn't explain your LC town read and I didn't like that

past that I still don't really get why you think the mason thing is towny
How seriously do you treat early-game reads?

depends on the player. For you, not very seriously

Posted: **Sun Feb 28, 2021 10:13 pm**

c4e5g3d5 wrote: ↑Sun Feb 28, 2021 10:12 pm
Urist wrote: ↑Sun Feb 28, 2021 10:11 pm
c4e5g3d5 wrote: ↑Sun Feb 28, 2021 10:08 pm
Urist wrote: ↑Sun Feb 28, 2021 10:06 pm the scummiest thing spf has done is receive a distancing vote from c4
Said by someone not voting me
that's not really relevant in a 26p game
Sure, except you're voting the last possible person who could be partnered with me.

that's not really relevant in a multiball game

Posted: **Sun Feb 28, 2021 10:13 pm**

c4e5g3d5 wrote: ↑Sun Feb 28, 2021 10:11 pm
Epignosis wrote: ↑Sun Feb 28, 2021 10:09 pm [VOTE: Esooa] aubergine
Anyone who wants to kill Esooa rn has to go through me first.

Posted: **Sun Feb 28, 2021 10:14 pm**

Esooa wrote: ↑Sun Feb 28, 2021 10:13 pm
Sloonei wrote: ↑Sun Feb 28, 2021 10:12 pm
Esooa wrote: ↑Sun Feb 28, 2021 10:10 pm your read on LC is weird and I think he's very likely scum. Biggest reason is he immediately switched his posting style when I pointed out he was more serious than normal. You didn't explain your LC town read and I didn't like that

past that I still don't really get why you think the mason thing is towny
How seriously do you treat early-game reads?
depends on the player. For you, not very seriously

I meant your own reads, or reads in general.

When you say "for me" do you mean the reads that I have stated? Why? What is your perception of me? I think this is our first game together, or maybe our second.

Posted: **Sun Feb 28, 2021 10:14 pm**

Esooa wrote: ↑Sun Feb 28, 2021 10:13 pm
Sloonei wrote: ↑Sun Feb 28, 2021 10:12 pm
Esooa wrote: ↑Sun Feb 28, 2021 10:10 pm your read on LC is weird and I think he's very likely scum. Biggest reason is he immediately switched his posting style when I pointed out he was more serious than normal. You didn't explain your LC town read and I didn't like that

past that I still don't really get why you think the mason thing is towny
How seriously do you treat early-game reads?
depends on the player. For you, not very seriously

unless you mean how seriously I treat your reads

I think they're valid to criticize and base reads off of

for how much weight I give that refer to my last post lol

Posted: **Sun Feb 28, 2021 10:15 pm**

Sloonei wrote: ↑Sun Feb 28, 2021 10:14 pm
Esooa wrote: ↑Sun Feb 28, 2021 10:13 pm
Sloonei wrote: ↑Sun Feb 28, 2021 10:12 pm
Esooa wrote: ↑Sun Feb 28, 2021 10:10 pm your read on LC is weird and I think he's very likely scum. Biggest reason is he immediately switched his posting style when I pointed out he was more serious than normal. You didn't explain your LC town read and I didn't like that

past that I still don't really get why you think the mason thing is towny
How seriously do you treat early-game reads?
depends on the player. For you, not very seriously
I meant your own reads, or reads in general.

When you say "for me" do you mean the reads that I have stated? Why? What is your perception of me? I think this is our first game together, or maybe our second.

need to do stuff for a few minutes so a quick response then will answer more later

I meant I treat my current read on you as not very serious and likely to change pending what you do later

Posted: **Sun Feb 28, 2021 10:16 pm**

Long Con wrote: ↑Sun Feb 28, 2021 10:13 pm
c4e5g3d5 wrote: ↑Sun Feb 28, 2021 10:11 pm
Epignosis wrote: ↑Sun Feb 28, 2021 10:09 pm [VOTE: Esooa] aubergine
Anyone who wants to kill Esooa rn has to go through me first.

Yeah exactly, if I'm white knighting her you go through me first.

Posted: **Sun Feb 28, 2021 10:16 pm**

Oh come on now

Posted: **Sun Feb 28, 2021 10:21 pm**

Esooa wrote: ↑Sun Feb 28, 2021 10:15 pm need to do stuff for a few minutes so a quick response then will answer more later

I meant I treat my current read on you as not very serious and likely to change pending what you do later

Noted.

The reason I asked is that you seemed to be assigning more weight to my Long Con and spf reads than I am myself. I believe in the reads I have expressed in them so far, but I do not consider either of them to be even remotely close to solid. They are my initial impressions on the game.

There is not much more to the LC read than what I have said: I thought his attitude when he joked about being masons with me looked like a happy and carefree LC. The whole "claiming masons is easy" thing is not a line I'd apply to LC in particular: he's an old school Syndicat. The trend of claiming masons on Day 1 is a strange new custom we're not used to here. So I don't look at it as a routine thing for him to do. I just thought the post suggested he was coming at the thread from a place of ease, not straining to integrate himself. A vague impression, but an impression nonetheless.

I thought his response to the suspicion was snarky but laidback. I didn't mind. Scum LC doesn't get rattled by early Day 1 pressure.

Posted: **Sun Feb 28, 2021 10:22 pm**

Long Con wrote: ↑Sun Feb 28, 2021 10:13 pm
c4e5g3d5 wrote: ↑Sun Feb 28, 2021 10:11 pm
Epignosis wrote: ↑Sun Feb 28, 2021 10:09 pm [VOTE: Esooa] aubergine
Anyone who wants to kill Esooa rn has to go through me first.

One of the greatest Christmas movies of All Time.

Nice.

Posted: **Sun Feb 28, 2021 10:22 pm**

Posted: **Sun Feb 28, 2021 10:23 pm**

nanook!

Posted: **Sun Feb 28, 2021 10:23 pm**

Urist!

Posted: **Sun Feb 28, 2021 10:23 pm**

Esooa wrote: ↑Sun Feb 28, 2021 10:15 pm
Sloonei wrote: ↑Sun Feb 28, 2021 10:14 pm
Esooa wrote: ↑Sun Feb 28, 2021 10:13 pm
Sloonei wrote: ↑Sun Feb 28, 2021 10:12 pm
Esooa wrote: ↑Sun Feb 28, 2021 10:10 pm your read on LC is weird and I think he's very likely scum. Biggest reason is he immediately switched his posting style when I pointed out he was more serious than normal. You didn't explain your LC town read and I didn't like that

past that I still don't really get why you think the mason thing is towny
How seriously do you treat early-game reads?
depends on the player. For you, not very seriously
I meant your own reads, or reads in general.

When you say "for me" do you mean the reads that I have stated? Why? What is your perception of me? I think this is our first game together, or maybe our second.
need to do stuff for a few minutes so a quick response then will answer more later

I meant I treat my current read on you as not very serious and likely to change pending what you do later

Isn't that true of all reads?

Posted: **Sun Feb 28, 2021 10:28 pm**

Posted: **Sun Feb 28, 2021 10:28 pm**

Sloonei wrote: ↑Sun Feb 28, 2021 10:21 pm
Esooa wrote: ↑Sun Feb 28, 2021 10:15 pm need to do stuff for a few minutes so a quick response then will answer more later

I meant I treat my current read on you as not very serious and likely to change pending what you do later
Noted.

The reason I asked is that you seemed to be assigning more weight to my Long Con and spf reads than I am myself. I believe in the reads I have expressed in them so far, but I do not consider either of them to be even remotely close to solid. They are my initial impressions on the game.

There is not much more to the LC read than what I have said: I thought his attitude when he joked about being masons with me looked like a happy and carefree LC. The whole "claiming masons is easy" thing is not a line I'd apply to LC in particular: he's an old school Syndicat. The trend of claiming masons on Day 1 is a strange new custom we're not used to here. So I don't look at it as a routine thing for him to do. I just thought the post suggested he was coming at the thread from a place of ease, not straining to integrate himself. A vague impression, but an impression nonetheless.

I thought his response to the suspicion was snarky but laidback. I didn't mind. Scum LC doesn't get rattled by early Day 1 pressure.

if that's why then okay; that makes more sense

I figured you were saying it was towny because of something along the lines of masons are a town only role.

I still think his response was bad. It doesn't have to do with being rattled, it has to do with what was imo an unnatural change in behavior when I pointed it out

as for how seriously I'm treating your reads; I don't expect you to strongly town read LC, but I do expect your (less serious) town read to have valid reasoning, which I didn't see before

what's your read on me?

Posted: **Sun Feb 28, 2021 10:29 pm**

Epignosis wrote: ↑Sun Feb 28, 2021 10:28 pm

I'm not reading any of these

Posted: **Sun Feb 28, 2021 10:30 pm**

falcon45ca wrote: ↑Sun Feb 28, 2021 10:23 pm
Esooa wrote: ↑Sun Feb 28, 2021 10:15 pm
Sloonei wrote: ↑Sun Feb 28, 2021 10:14 pm
Esooa wrote: ↑Sun Feb 28, 2021 10:13 pm
Sloonei wrote: ↑Sun Feb 28, 2021 10:12 pm
Esooa wrote: ↑Sun Feb 28, 2021 10:10 pm your read on LC is weird and I think he's very likely scum. Biggest reason is he immediately switched his posting style when I pointed out he was more serious than normal. You didn't explain your LC town read and I didn't like that

past that I still don't really get why you think the mason thing is towny
How seriously do you treat early-game reads?
depends on the player. For you, not very seriously
I meant your own reads, or reads in general.

When you say "for me" do you mean the reads that I have stated? Why? What is your perception of me? I think this is our first game together, or maybe our second.
need to do stuff for a few minutes so a quick response then will answer more later

I meant I treat my current read on you as not very serious and likely to change pending what you do later
Isn't that true of all reads?

maybe? Not all, but I said that as in, "it's likely to change;" or, I wouldn't be surprised if it changed, because my read as of right now isn't very strong

Posted: **Sun Feb 28, 2021 10:30 pm**

Epignosis wrote: ↑Sun Feb 28, 2021 10:28 pm

Holy fuck are you forced to talk like this or something?

Anyway, ISO me and you should find it pretty quickly.

Posted: **Sun Feb 28, 2021 10:30 pm**

Esooa wrote: ↑Sun Feb 28, 2021 10:29 pm
Epignosis wrote: ↑Sun Feb 28, 2021 10:28 pm
I'm not reading any of these

Why not?

Posted: **Sun Feb 28, 2021 10:31 pm**

Sloonei wrote: ↑Sun Feb 28, 2021 10:30 pm
Esooa wrote: ↑Sun Feb 28, 2021 10:29 pm
Epignosis wrote: ↑Sun Feb 28, 2021 10:28 pm
I'm not reading any of these
Why not?

I'm on mobile and it's too small to read without going through the trouble of making it bigger which meh

Posted: **Sun Feb 28, 2021 10:32 pm**

Epignosis wrote: ↑Sun Feb 28, 2021 10:28 pm

Wait wtf is Esooa a pokemon or Hodor or smth

Posted: **Sun Feb 28, 2021 10:33 pm**

Esooa wrote: ↑Sun Feb 28, 2021 10:28 pm what's your read on me?

Unsure. I feel like your reasons for being wary of me make sense from a civilian perspective, but your responses to my questions have felt like you are trying not to extend yourself too much, playing it a little hostile rather than just answering the questions I am asking. But sometimes my questions just do that to people, so I'm not going to commit to a read on that just yet.

The Syndicate

Fallout 2: A Post-Nuclear Mafia Game [AMERICA RISES]

Re: Fallout 2: A Post-Nuclear Mafia Game [Day 1]

Re: Fallout 2: A Post-Nuclear Mafia Game [Day 1]

Re: Fallout 2: A Post-Nuclear Mafia Game [Day 1]

Re: Fallout 2: A Post-Nuclear Mafia Game [Day 1]

Re: Fallout 2: A Post-Nuclear Mafia Game [Day 1]

Re: Fallout 2: A Post-Nuclear Mafia Game [Day 1]

Re: Fallout 2: A Post-Nuclear Mafia Game [Day 1]

Re: Fallout 2: A Post-Nuclear Mafia Game [Day 1]

Re: Fallout 2: A Post-Nuclear Mafia Game [Day 1]

Re: Fallout 2: A Post-Nuclear Mafia Game [Day 1]

Re: Fallout 2: A Post-Nuclear Mafia Game [Day 1]

Re: Fallout 2: A Post-Nuclear Mafia Game [Day 1]

Re: Fallout 2: A Post-Nuclear Mafia Game [Day 1]

Re: Fallout 2: A Post-Nuclear Mafia Game [Day 1]

Re: Fallout 2: A Post-Nuclear Mafia Game [Day 1]

Re: Fallout 2: A Post-Nuclear Mafia Game [Day 1]

Re: Fallout 2: A Post-Nuclear Mafia Game [Day 1]

Re: Fallout 2: A Post-Nuclear Mafia Game [Day 1]

Re: Fallout 2: A Post-Nuclear Mafia Game [Day 1]

Re: Fallout 2: A Post-Nuclear Mafia Game [Day 1]

Re: Fallout 2: A Post-Nuclear Mafia Game [Day 1]

Re: Fallout 2: A Post-Nuclear Mafia Game [Day 1]

Re: Fallout 2: A Post-Nuclear Mafia Game [Day 1]

Re: Fallout 2: A Post-Nuclear Mafia Game [Day 1]

Re: Fallout 2: A Post-Nuclear Mafia Game [Day 1]

Re: Fallout 2: A Post-Nuclear Mafia Game [Day 1]

Re: Fallout 2: A Post-Nuclear Mafia Game [Day 1]

Re: Fallout 2: A Post-Nuclear Mafia Game [Day 1]

Re: Fallout 2: A Post-Nuclear Mafia Game [Day 1]

Re: Fallout 2: A Post-Nuclear Mafia Game [Day 1]

Re: Fallout 2: A Post-Nuclear Mafia Game [Day 1]

Re: Fallout 2: A Post-Nuclear Mafia Game [Day 1]

Re: Fallout 2: A Post-Nuclear Mafia Game [Day 1]

Re: Fallout 2: A Post-Nuclear Mafia Game [Day 1]

Re: Fallout 2: A Post-Nuclear Mafia Game [Day 1]

Re: Fallout 2: A Post-Nuclear Mafia Game [Day 1]

Re: Fallout 2: A Post-Nuclear Mafia Game [Day 1]

Re: Fallout 2: A Post-Nuclear Mafia Game [Day 1]

Re: Fallout 2: A Post-Nuclear Mafia Game [Day 1]

Re: Fallout 2: A Post-Nuclear Mafia Game [Day 1]

Re: Fallout 2: A Post-Nuclear Mafia Game [Day 1]

Re: Fallout 2: A Post-Nuclear Mafia Game [Day 1]

Re: Fallout 2: A Post-Nuclear Mafia Game [Day 1]

Re: Fallout 2: A Post-Nuclear Mafia Game [Day 1]

Re: Fallout 2: A Post-Nuclear Mafia Game [Day 1]

Re: Fallout 2: A Post-Nuclear Mafia Game [Day 1]

Re: Fallout 2: A Post-Nuclear Mafia Game [Day 1]

Re: Fallout 2: A Post-Nuclear Mafia Game [Day 1]

Re: Fallout 2: A Post-Nuclear Mafia Game [Day 1]

Re: Fallout 2: A Post-Nuclear Mafia Game [Day 1]