Re: Severance [Phase Zero]
Posted: Tue Nov 14, 2023 1:50 pm
The response was a joke but
Lazy.
Which makes it all the more weird that you refuse to read this one particular player.Also I gave reads
Yes it isleetic wrote: ↑Tue Nov 14, 2023 1:49 pmNot having thoughts is not a thought.TonyStarkPrime wrote: ↑Tue Nov 14, 2023 1:47 pmyes I’ve given some of themleetic wrote: ↑Tue Nov 14, 2023 1:47 pmGot any actual thoughts for us?TonyStarkPrime wrote: ↑Tue Nov 14, 2023 1:44 pm Bold of you to assume that me knowing that someone is Schweppes would impact my reads. I have no reads. Besides, I do not know who Schweppes is.
I like seeing existent discussion between Ran / WWA / Robyn because I think they are capable of coming to reasonably conclusions but I cannot bring myself to pretend that I think such discussions are useful or necessaryleetic wrote: ↑Tue Nov 14, 2023 1:49 pmNot having thoughts is not a thought.TonyStarkPrime wrote: ↑Tue Nov 14, 2023 1:47 pmyes I’ve given some of themleetic wrote: ↑Tue Nov 14, 2023 1:47 pmGot any actual thoughts for us?TonyStarkPrime wrote: ↑Tue Nov 14, 2023 1:44 pm Bold of you to assume that me knowing that someone is Schweppes would impact my reads. I have no reads. Besides, I do not know who Schweppes is.
So then I guess not having reads is a read and not having hobbies is a hobby☆Princess Abigail☆ wrote: ↑Tue Nov 14, 2023 1:51 pmYes it isleetic wrote: ↑Tue Nov 14, 2023 1:49 pmNot having thoughts is not a thought.TonyStarkPrime wrote: ↑Tue Nov 14, 2023 1:47 pmyes I’ve given some of themleetic wrote: ↑Tue Nov 14, 2023 1:47 pmGot any actual thoughts for us?TonyStarkPrime wrote: ↑Tue Nov 14, 2023 1:44 pm Bold of you to assume that me knowing that someone is Schweppes would impact my reads. I have no reads. Besides, I do not know who Schweppes is.
It's just one you don't like
Correctleetic wrote: ↑Tue Nov 14, 2023 1:52 pmSo then I guess not having reads is a read and not having hobbies is a hobby☆Princess Abigail☆ wrote: ↑Tue Nov 14, 2023 1:51 pmYes it isleetic wrote: ↑Tue Nov 14, 2023 1:49 pmNot having thoughts is not a thought.TonyStarkPrime wrote: ↑Tue Nov 14, 2023 1:47 pmyes I’ve given some of themleetic wrote: ↑Tue Nov 14, 2023 1:47 pmGot any actual thoughts for us?TonyStarkPrime wrote: ↑Tue Nov 14, 2023 1:44 pm Bold of you to assume that me knowing that someone is Schweppes would impact my reads. I have no reads. Besides, I do not know who Schweppes is.
It's just one you don't like
I want ice creamleetic wrote: ↑Tue Nov 14, 2023 1:49 pmNot having thoughts is not a thought.TonyStarkPrime wrote: ↑Tue Nov 14, 2023 1:47 pmyes I’ve given some of themleetic wrote: ↑Tue Nov 14, 2023 1:47 pmGot any actual thoughts for us?TonyStarkPrime wrote: ↑Tue Nov 14, 2023 1:44 pm Bold of you to assume that me knowing that someone is Schweppes would impact my reads. I have no reads. Besides, I do not know who Schweppes is.
What do you think of their discussions thus far? This post is just fluffTonyStarkPrime wrote: ↑Tue Nov 14, 2023 1:51 pmI like seeing existent discussion between Ran / WWA / Robyn because I think they are capable of coming to reasonably conclusions but I cannot bring myself to pretend that I think such discussions are useful or necessaryleetic wrote: ↑Tue Nov 14, 2023 1:49 pmNot having thoughts is not a thought.TonyStarkPrime wrote: ↑Tue Nov 14, 2023 1:47 pmyes I’ve given some of themleetic wrote: ↑Tue Nov 14, 2023 1:47 pmGot any actual thoughts for us?TonyStarkPrime wrote: ↑Tue Nov 14, 2023 1:44 pm Bold of you to assume that me knowing that someone is Schweppes would impact my reads. I have no reads. Besides, I do not know who Schweppes is.
I have Ice cream cake want some?TonyStarkPrime wrote: ↑Tue Nov 14, 2023 1:53 pmI want ice creamleetic wrote: ↑Tue Nov 14, 2023 1:49 pmNot having thoughts is not a thought.TonyStarkPrime wrote: ↑Tue Nov 14, 2023 1:47 pmyes I’ve given some of themleetic wrote: ↑Tue Nov 14, 2023 1:47 pmGot any actual thoughts for us?TonyStarkPrime wrote: ↑Tue Nov 14, 2023 1:44 pm Bold of you to assume that me knowing that someone is Schweppes would impact my reads. I have no reads. Besides, I do not know who Schweppes is.
The answer to your question is contained in the post. Your question is just fluff.leetic wrote: ↑Tue Nov 14, 2023 1:53 pmWhat do you think of their discussions thus far? This post is just fluffTonyStarkPrime wrote: ↑Tue Nov 14, 2023 1:51 pmI like seeing existent discussion between Ran / WWA / Robyn because I think they are capable of coming to reasonably conclusions but I cannot bring myself to pretend that I think such discussions are useful or necessaryleetic wrote: ↑Tue Nov 14, 2023 1:49 pmNot having thoughts is not a thought.TonyStarkPrime wrote: ↑Tue Nov 14, 2023 1:47 pmyes I’ve given some of themleetic wrote: ↑Tue Nov 14, 2023 1:47 pmGot any actual thoughts for us?TonyStarkPrime wrote: ↑Tue Nov 14, 2023 1:44 pm Bold of you to assume that me knowing that someone is Schweppes would impact my reads. I have no reads. Besides, I do not know who Schweppes is.
The person you got "no impression" from, mayhaps? Are you even paying attention?☆Princess Abigail☆ wrote: ↑Tue Nov 14, 2023 1:52 pmI'll be honest I have no idea who you want me to read
Sad I'm about to eat a whole ass ice cream cakeTonyStarkPrime wrote: ↑Tue Nov 14, 2023 1:53 pm I’m about to go on a run, I’ll save ice cream until after (this is self control)
Saying you "like" something isn't a read. I like pie, is that a read?TonyStarkPrime wrote: ↑Tue Nov 14, 2023 1:54 pmThe answer to your question is contained in the post. Your question is just fluff.leetic wrote: ↑Tue Nov 14, 2023 1:53 pmWhat do you think of their discussions thus far? This post is just fluffTonyStarkPrime wrote: ↑Tue Nov 14, 2023 1:51 pmI like seeing existent discussion between Ran / WWA / Robyn because I think they are capable of coming to reasonably conclusions but I cannot bring myself to pretend that I think such discussions are useful or necessaryleetic wrote: ↑Tue Nov 14, 2023 1:49 pmNot having thoughts is not a thought.TonyStarkPrime wrote: ↑Tue Nov 14, 2023 1:47 pmyes I’ve given some of themleetic wrote: ↑Tue Nov 14, 2023 1:47 pmGot any actual thoughts for us?TonyStarkPrime wrote: ↑Tue Nov 14, 2023 1:44 pm Bold of you to assume that me knowing that someone is Schweppes would impact my reads. I have no reads. Besides, I do not know who Schweppes is.
I have literally no idea who your talking about. I literally just said that because I thought it would make you react. It did.leetic wrote: ↑Tue Nov 14, 2023 1:54 pmThe person you got "no impression" from, mayhaps? Are you even paying attention?☆Princess Abigail☆ wrote: ↑Tue Nov 14, 2023 1:52 pmI'll be honest I have no idea who you want me to read
Yes it isleetic wrote: ↑Tue Nov 14, 2023 1:55 pmSaying you "like" something isn't a read. I like pie, is that a read?TonyStarkPrime wrote: ↑Tue Nov 14, 2023 1:54 pmThe answer to your question is contained in the post. Your question is just fluff.leetic wrote: ↑Tue Nov 14, 2023 1:53 pmWhat do you think of their discussions thus far? This post is just fluffTonyStarkPrime wrote: ↑Tue Nov 14, 2023 1:51 pmI like seeing existent discussion between Ran / WWA / Robyn because I think they are capable of coming to reasonably conclusions but I cannot bring myself to pretend that I think such discussions are useful or necessary
I was referring to the part where I called it uselessleetic wrote: ↑Tue Nov 14, 2023 1:55 pmSaying you "like" something isn't a read. I like pie, is that a read?TonyStarkPrime wrote: ↑Tue Nov 14, 2023 1:54 pmThe answer to your question is contained in the post. Your question is just fluff.leetic wrote: ↑Tue Nov 14, 2023 1:53 pmWhat do you think of their discussions thus far? This post is just fluffTonyStarkPrime wrote: ↑Tue Nov 14, 2023 1:51 pmI like seeing existent discussion between Ran / WWA / Robyn because I think they are capable of coming to reasonably conclusions but I cannot bring myself to pretend that I think such discussions are useful or necessary
Ranmilia, which should have been obvious as they were namedropped at least twice. You're not doing much to shave off my impression of you being lazy☆Princess Abigail☆ wrote: ↑Tue Nov 14, 2023 1:55 pmI have literally no idea who your talking about. I literally just said that because I thought it would make you react. It did.leetic wrote: ↑Tue Nov 14, 2023 1:54 pmThe person you got "no impression" from, mayhaps? Are you even paying attention?☆Princess Abigail☆ wrote: ↑Tue Nov 14, 2023 1:52 pmI'll be honest I have no idea who you want me to read
So if it's "useless", why did you feel the need to comment about it over anything else? If you're not going to determine anything alignment-related off of it, what's the point?TonyStarkPrime wrote: ↑Tue Nov 14, 2023 1:56 pmI was referring to the part where I called it uselessleetic wrote: ↑Tue Nov 14, 2023 1:55 pmSaying you "like" something isn't a read. I like pie, is that a read?TonyStarkPrime wrote: ↑Tue Nov 14, 2023 1:54 pmThe answer to your question is contained in the post. Your question is just fluff.leetic wrote: ↑Tue Nov 14, 2023 1:53 pmWhat do you think of their discussions thus far? This post is just fluffTonyStarkPrime wrote: ↑Tue Nov 14, 2023 1:51 pmI like seeing existent discussion between Ran / WWA / Robyn because I think they are capable of coming to reasonably conclusions but I cannot bring myself to pretend that I think such discussions are useful or necessary
You’re not gonna make me scum read you just by being annoying but cmonleetic wrote: ↑Tue Nov 14, 2023 1:57 pmRanmilia, which should have been obvious as they were namedropped at least twice. You're not doing much to shave off my impression of you being lazy☆Princess Abigail☆ wrote: ↑Tue Nov 14, 2023 1:55 pmI have literally no idea who your talking about. I literally just said that because I thought it would make you react. It did.leetic wrote: ↑Tue Nov 14, 2023 1:54 pmThe person you got "no impression" from, mayhaps? Are you even paying attention?☆Princess Abigail☆ wrote: ↑Tue Nov 14, 2023 1:52 pmI'll be honest I have no idea who you want me to read
Is a scummy read though cause pie sucks☆Princess Abigail☆ wrote: ↑Tue Nov 14, 2023 1:56 pmYes it isleetic wrote: ↑Tue Nov 14, 2023 1:55 pmSaying you "like" something isn't a read. I like pie, is that a read?TonyStarkPrime wrote: ↑Tue Nov 14, 2023 1:54 pmThe answer to your question is contained in the post. Your question is just fluff.leetic wrote: ↑Tue Nov 14, 2023 1:53 pmWhat do you think of their discussions thus far? This post is just fluffTonyStarkPrime wrote: ↑Tue Nov 14, 2023 1:51 pmI like seeing existent discussion between Ran / WWA / Robyn because I think they are capable of coming to reasonably conclusions but I cannot bring myself to pretend that I think such discussions are useful or necessary
I was answering your questionleetic wrote: ↑Tue Nov 14, 2023 1:58 pmSo if it's "useless", why did you feel the need to comment about it over anything else? If you're not going to determine anything alignment-related off of it, what's the point?TonyStarkPrime wrote: ↑Tue Nov 14, 2023 1:56 pmI was referring to the part where I called it uselessleetic wrote: ↑Tue Nov 14, 2023 1:55 pmSaying you "like" something isn't a read. I like pie, is that a read?TonyStarkPrime wrote: ↑Tue Nov 14, 2023 1:54 pmThe answer to your question is contained in the post. Your question is just fluff.leetic wrote: ↑Tue Nov 14, 2023 1:53 pmWhat do you think of their discussions thus far? This post is just fluffTonyStarkPrime wrote: ↑Tue Nov 14, 2023 1:51 pmI like seeing existent discussion between Ran / WWA / Robyn because I think they are capable of coming to reasonably conclusions but I cannot bring myself to pretend that I think such discussions are useful or necessary
Stop calling me lazy please.leetic wrote: ↑Tue Nov 14, 2023 1:57 pmRanmilia, which should have been obvious as they were namedropped at least twice. You're not doing much to shave off my impression of you being lazy☆Princess Abigail☆ wrote: ↑Tue Nov 14, 2023 1:55 pmI have literally no idea who your talking about. I literally just said that because I thought it would make you react. It did.leetic wrote: ↑Tue Nov 14, 2023 1:54 pmThe person you got "no impression" from, mayhaps? Are you even paying attention?☆Princess Abigail☆ wrote: ↑Tue Nov 14, 2023 1:52 pmI'll be honest I have no idea who you want me to read
I'm mad that you're pocketing me but also that you're right☆Princess Abigail☆ wrote: ↑Tue Nov 14, 2023 1:44 pmYour my favoriteWindwardAway wrote: ↑Tue Nov 14, 2023 1:37 pmAgreed☆Princess Abigail☆ wrote: ↑Tue Nov 14, 2023 1:35 pmTowny for real
Dubz top town no cap. Like holy fuck if you push this you are bad at mafia
(I have nothing else to add but yeah)
And also obv town
Why Bereft?
Which discussion was that?TonyStarkPrime wrote: ↑Tue Nov 14, 2023 1:51 pmI like seeing existent discussion between Ran / WWA / Robyn because I think they are capable of coming to reasonably conclusions but I cannot bring myself to pretend that I think such discussions are useful or necessaryleetic wrote: ↑Tue Nov 14, 2023 1:49 pmNot having thoughts is not a thought.TonyStarkPrime wrote: ↑Tue Nov 14, 2023 1:47 pmyes I’ve given some of themleetic wrote: ↑Tue Nov 14, 2023 1:47 pmGot any actual thoughts for us?TonyStarkPrime wrote: ↑Tue Nov 14, 2023 1:44 pm Bold of you to assume that me knowing that someone is Schweppes would impact my reads. I have no reads. Besides, I do not know who Schweppes is.
If you try everything in your might to not have a hobby, then yes, you've made not having a hobby into a hobby.leetic wrote: ↑Tue Nov 14, 2023 1:52 pmSo then I guess not having reads is a read and not having hobbies is a hobby☆Princess Abigail☆ wrote: ↑Tue Nov 14, 2023 1:51 pmYes it isleetic wrote: ↑Tue Nov 14, 2023 1:49 pmNot having thoughts is not a thought.TonyStarkPrime wrote: ↑Tue Nov 14, 2023 1:47 pmyes I’ve given some of themleetic wrote: ↑Tue Nov 14, 2023 1:47 pmGot any actual thoughts for us?TonyStarkPrime wrote: ↑Tue Nov 14, 2023 1:44 pm Bold of you to assume that me knowing that someone is Schweppes would impact my reads. I have no reads. Besides, I do not know who Schweppes is.
It's just one you don't like
So your only thought is something with no substance, am I getting this correctly?TonyStarkPrime wrote: ↑Tue Nov 14, 2023 1:59 pmI was answering your questionleetic wrote: ↑Tue Nov 14, 2023 1:58 pmSo if it's "useless", why did you feel the need to comment about it over anything else? If you're not going to determine anything alignment-related off of it, what's the point?TonyStarkPrime wrote: ↑Tue Nov 14, 2023 1:56 pmI was referring to the part where I called it uselessleetic wrote: ↑Tue Nov 14, 2023 1:55 pmSaying you "like" something isn't a read. I like pie, is that a read?TonyStarkPrime wrote: ↑Tue Nov 14, 2023 1:54 pmThe answer to your question is contained in the post. Your question is just fluff.leetic wrote: ↑Tue Nov 14, 2023 1:53 pmWhat do you think of their discussions thus far? This post is just fluffTonyStarkPrime wrote: ↑Tue Nov 14, 2023 1:51 pm
I like seeing existent discussion between Ran / WWA / Robyn because I think they are capable of coming to reasonably conclusions but I cannot bring myself to pretend that I think such discussions are useful or necessary
I like how leetic is allowed to call other people's posts fluff but for some reason I'm notleetic wrote: ↑Tue Nov 14, 2023 1:53 pmWhat do you think of their discussions thus far? This post is just fluffTonyStarkPrime wrote: ↑Tue Nov 14, 2023 1:51 pmI like seeing existent discussion between Ran / WWA / Robyn because I think they are capable of coming to reasonably conclusions but I cannot bring myself to pretend that I think such discussions are useful or necessaryleetic wrote: ↑Tue Nov 14, 2023 1:49 pmNot having thoughts is not a thought.TonyStarkPrime wrote: ↑Tue Nov 14, 2023 1:47 pmyes I’ve given some of themleetic wrote: ↑Tue Nov 14, 2023 1:47 pmGot any actual thoughts for us?TonyStarkPrime wrote: ↑Tue Nov 14, 2023 1:44 pm Bold of you to assume that me knowing that someone is Schweppes would impact my reads. I have no reads. Besides, I do not know who Schweppes is.
Correctleetic wrote: ↑Tue Nov 14, 2023 2:07 pmSo your only thought is something with no substance, am I getting this correctly?TonyStarkPrime wrote: ↑Tue Nov 14, 2023 1:59 pmI was answering your questionleetic wrote: ↑Tue Nov 14, 2023 1:58 pmSo if it's "useless", why did you feel the need to comment about it over anything else? If you're not going to determine anything alignment-related off of it, what's the point?TonyStarkPrime wrote: ↑Tue Nov 14, 2023 1:56 pmI was referring to the part where I called it uselessleetic wrote: ↑Tue Nov 14, 2023 1:55 pmSaying you "like" something isn't a read. I like pie, is that a read?TonyStarkPrime wrote: ↑Tue Nov 14, 2023 1:54 pmThe answer to your question is contained in the post. Your question is just fluff.
Doing nothing isn't a hobby, it's just lazinessWindwardAway wrote: ↑Tue Nov 14, 2023 2:06 pmIf you try everything in your might to not have a hobby, then yes, you've made not having a hobby into a hobby.leetic wrote: ↑Tue Nov 14, 2023 1:52 pmSo then I guess not having reads is a read and not having hobbies is a hobby☆Princess Abigail☆ wrote: ↑Tue Nov 14, 2023 1:51 pmYes it isleetic wrote: ↑Tue Nov 14, 2023 1:49 pmNot having thoughts is not a thought.TonyStarkPrime wrote: ↑Tue Nov 14, 2023 1:47 pmyes I’ve given some of themleetic wrote: ↑Tue Nov 14, 2023 1:47 pmGot any actual thoughts for us?TonyStarkPrime wrote: ↑Tue Nov 14, 2023 1:44 pm Bold of you to assume that me knowing that someone is Schweppes would impact my reads. I have no reads. Besides, I do not know who Schweppes is.
It's just one you don't like
you’re allowed, you just haven’t been calling posts “fluff” as effectively as leeticWindwardAway wrote: ↑Tue Nov 14, 2023 2:07 pmI like how leetic is allowed to call other people's posts fluff but for some reason I'm notleetic wrote: ↑Tue Nov 14, 2023 1:53 pmWhat do you think of their discussions thus far? This post is just fluffTonyStarkPrime wrote: ↑Tue Nov 14, 2023 1:51 pmI like seeing existent discussion between Ran / WWA / Robyn because I think they are capable of coming to reasonably conclusions but I cannot bring myself to pretend that I think such discussions are useful or necessaryleetic wrote: ↑Tue Nov 14, 2023 1:49 pmNot having thoughts is not a thought.TonyStarkPrime wrote: ↑Tue Nov 14, 2023 1:47 pmyes I’ve given some of themleetic wrote: ↑Tue Nov 14, 2023 1:47 pmGot any actual thoughts for us?TonyStarkPrime wrote: ↑Tue Nov 14, 2023 1:44 pm Bold of you to assume that me knowing that someone is Schweppes would impact my reads. I have no reads. Besides, I do not know who Schweppes is.
Here's the difference: I only call out actual fluff, while you for some reason think that GTH reads are "fluff"WindwardAway wrote: ↑Tue Nov 14, 2023 2:07 pmI like how leetic is allowed to call other people's posts fluff but for some reason I'm notleetic wrote: ↑Tue Nov 14, 2023 1:53 pmWhat do you think of their discussions thus far? This post is just fluffTonyStarkPrime wrote: ↑Tue Nov 14, 2023 1:51 pmI like seeing existent discussion between Ran / WWA / Robyn because I think they are capable of coming to reasonably conclusions but I cannot bring myself to pretend that I think such discussions are useful or necessaryleetic wrote: ↑Tue Nov 14, 2023 1:49 pmNot having thoughts is not a thought.TonyStarkPrime wrote: ↑Tue Nov 14, 2023 1:47 pmyes I’ve given some of themleetic wrote: ↑Tue Nov 14, 2023 1:47 pmGot any actual thoughts for us?TonyStarkPrime wrote: ↑Tue Nov 14, 2023 1:44 pm Bold of you to assume that me knowing that someone is Schweppes would impact my reads. I have no reads. Besides, I do not know who Schweppes is.
I've only played with him in mashes and once right before this game and I got nothing tbh
Does it make you feel better that I'm pocketing you as town this time.WindwardAway wrote: ↑Tue Nov 14, 2023 2:01 pmI'm mad that you're pocketing me but also that you're right☆Princess Abigail☆ wrote: ↑Tue Nov 14, 2023 1:44 pmYour my favoriteWindwardAway wrote: ↑Tue Nov 14, 2023 1:37 pmAgreed☆Princess Abigail☆ wrote: ↑Tue Nov 14, 2023 1:35 pmTowny for real
Dubz top town no cap. Like holy fuck if you push this you are bad at mafia
(I have nothing else to add but yeah)
And also obv town
You literally made GTH reads on two FLUFFPOSTS. I still don't understand how you don't see why that's just silly. I didn't say your reads were fluff, I said they were fake. And I said that the posts you were reading were fluff. Get it right.leetic wrote: ↑Tue Nov 14, 2023 2:08 pmHere's the difference: I only call out actual fluff, while you for some reason think that GTH reads are "fluff"WindwardAway wrote: ↑Tue Nov 14, 2023 2:07 pmI like how leetic is allowed to call other people's posts fluff but for some reason I'm notleetic wrote: ↑Tue Nov 14, 2023 1:53 pmWhat do you think of their discussions thus far? This post is just fluffTonyStarkPrime wrote: ↑Tue Nov 14, 2023 1:51 pmI like seeing existent discussion between Ran / WWA / Robyn because I think they are capable of coming to reasonably conclusions but I cannot bring myself to pretend that I think such discussions are useful or necessary
Yeah but does anyone seriously think the openers from Gira and Ran were indicative of alignment?? Why is that not fluff?robyn wrote: ↑Tue Nov 14, 2023 2:08 pmyou’re allowed, you just haven’t been calling posts “fluff” as effectively as leeticWindwardAway wrote: ↑Tue Nov 14, 2023 2:07 pmI like how leetic is allowed to call other people's posts fluff but for some reason I'm notleetic wrote: ↑Tue Nov 14, 2023 1:53 pmWhat do you think of their discussions thus far? This post is just fluffTonyStarkPrime wrote: ↑Tue Nov 14, 2023 1:51 pmI like seeing existent discussion between Ran / WWA / Robyn because I think they are capable of coming to reasonably conclusions but I cannot bring myself to pretend that I think such discussions are useful or necessary