The Syndicate

Posted: **Fri Jan 08, 2016 3:10 pm**

a2thezebra wrote:Yup.

Strong words. Ok, I'll put my faith in you. *votes Matt*

Posted: **Fri Jan 08, 2016 3:35 pm**

TheFloyd73 wrote:Nutella's vote on Day One was pretty much purposeless and Zebra having very split ended comments are both scum-like.

I also wonder wether Matt is using the same technique on Bullz that Epi used on me in that Tree game.

I want to know why Pretty Boy Floyd called Sonic's vote pretty much purposeless. Was it because her vote was by itself? Was it because her vote was for no reason? Or was it because her vote was on him? What does her vote say about her loyalties?

My vote sat on Sonic all day, and wasn't for much of a reason, so why wasn't my vote purposeless?

Finally, Floyd still hasn't stated how the "technique" I used on him in the woods (when I was doing a good job hunting some mighty tasty boar) makes Matt bad.

Posted: **Fri Jan 08, 2016 3:43 pm**

After reviewing my suspects from yesterday I'm not sure I want to vote for any of them right now.

I still feel kinda iffy on zebra and Floyd but Nutella and LC have taken a back seat for the moment. I'd like to hear some suspicions from Nutella though. And from SVS- who are you most suspicious of today SVS?

Posted: **Fri Jan 08, 2016 4:13 pm**

DrWilgy wrote:Hey Scotty, what do you think of SVS?

I think SVS has appealed to emotion over this game, and while she hasn't exactly gone above and beyond digging into Matt, she has not brought up any more relevant reads. A majority of her responses have her 'thinking about it more', but I'm still waiting on more reads than Matt. The whole SVS-Matt-Bullzeye thing is wearing on me, honestly. I still believe Matt to be good, and one or more of the current voters on him bad.

I do believe that if this vote stands and Matt turns out to be good, several people including SVS *cough cough and Zebra cough cough* will have a lot to answer to.

Posted: **Fri Jan 08, 2016 4:16 pm**

Matt wrote:Bullz - Whenever you come back in, please explain your vote on me. Like I said, you above all others know I have fun accusing you every game, so why in THIS game do you automatically assume I'm 99.9% bad?

Looking forward to your answer.

I think you're using "I have fun accusing you every game" as if it clears you of any suspicion. Like just because you do it (and you don't always do it) that means you can't be bad or something. I didn't automatically assume anything I just feel confident you're probably a baddie.

Posted: **Fri Jan 08, 2016 4:22 pm**

Scotty what's the point of the coughing after what I've said? You're damn right I'll have a lot to answer to if Matt flips good.

Guess why I'm not worried about it. Go on, guess.

Posted: **Fri Jan 08, 2016 4:26 pm**

a2thezebra wrote:Scotty what's the point of the coughing after what I've said? You're damn right I'll have a lot to answer to if Matt flips good.

Guess why I'm not worried about it. Go on, guess.

Because you're statistically more likely of "catching" a baddie based on your logic over the train Day 1? And that is supposed to make you look good whether or not Matt is bad. Is that it?

Or is it because whether or not he is bad you are just happy to commit to a vote because it shows strength?

Or is it because you are actually bad and know whether or not he is?

Or is it because you stole Biff's almanac?

Posted: **Fri Jan 08, 2016 4:34 pm**

Zebra do you have info that Matt is bad?

Posted: **Fri Jan 08, 2016 4:35 pm**

Bullzeye wrote:
Matt wrote:Bullz - Whenever you come back in, please explain your vote on me. Like I said, you above all others know I have fun accusing you every game, so why in THIS game do you automatically assume I'm 99.9% bad?

Looking forward to your answer.
I think you're using "I have fun accusing you every game" as if it clears you of any suspicion. Like just because you do it (and you don't always do it) that means you can't be bad or something. I didn't automatically assume anything I just feel confident you're probably a baddie.

Hey slick, how are you confident someone is "probably" bad? I took a math class once, and that ain't how probability work.

Tuft-Head is probably not bad. I am confident that the probability that he is bad is 25%- the same as it is for everybody.

Posted: **Fri Jan 08, 2016 4:37 pm**

Am I Tuft-Head?

Posted: **Fri Jan 08, 2016 4:38 pm**

Typhoony wrote:Zebra do you have info that Matt is bad?

Do you count being on the same team as info? :P

Epignosis wrote:
Bullzeye wrote:
Matt wrote:Bullz - Whenever you come back in, please explain your vote on me. Like I said, you above all others know I have fun accusing you every game, so why in THIS game do you automatically assume I'm 99.9% bad?

Looking forward to your answer.
I think you're using "I have fun accusing you every game" as if it clears you of any suspicion. Like just because you do it (and you don't always do it) that means you can't be bad or something. I didn't automatically assume anything I just feel confident you're probably a baddie.
Hey slick, how are you confident someone is "probably" bad? I took a math class once, and that ain't how probability work.

Tuft-Head is probably not bad. I am confident that the probability that he is bad is 25%- the same as it is for everybody.

I don't see what point there is to this post other than to be pedantic about language use. You know what I mean.

Posted: **Fri Jan 08, 2016 4:41 pm**

Epignosis wrote: Tuft-Head is probably not bad. I am confident that the probability that he is bad is 25%- the same as it is for everybody.

Technically it is higher than 25% or lower than 25%, since you know if you yourself are bad or not.

Posted: **Fri Jan 08, 2016 4:48 pm**

Typhoony wrote:
Epignosis wrote: Tuft-Head is probably not bad. I am confident that the probability that he is bad is 25%- the same as it is for everybody.
Technically it is higher than 25% or lower than 25%, since you know if you yourself are bad or not.

Taking a wild stab in the dark without any added info that any one of us is bad = ~28% chance you will be right.
I think it would idiotic for zebra to come out and say she has info on someone if she is civ, because that will get her killed tonight.

So to come out with an absolute is not a terrible bet to make. And even if she is wrong, hey- she committed to her choice. Has to count for something, right?

Posted: **Fri Jan 08, 2016 4:50 pm**

Anyway, sorry if you were good Matt. I tried

Posted: **Fri Jan 08, 2016 4:52 pm**

If Matt is bad she is already a huge target for tonight. Which means she is also a huge target for a protector role if that role is actually in the game.

Don't see a problem with Zebra saying she has info if she does.

Posted: **Fri Jan 08, 2016 4:52 pm**

I think zebra is in a very bad position currently, unless her win condition is Matt's death.

Posted: **Fri Jan 08, 2016 4:54 pm**

Typhoony wrote:If Matt is bad she is already a huge target for tonight. Which means she is also a huge target for a protector role if that role is actually in the game.

Don't see a problem with Zebra saying she has info if she does.

Ok, but if she's protected tonight, what then after that? I would assume the protector can't help her Night 3 because of double-targeting rules?
I would think if you have info, you would at least be a little more subtle about it this early in the game or at least wait a little longer down the line where she can be more useful.

Posted: **Fri Jan 08, 2016 4:56 pm**

I wonder what nutella thinks about all this game stuff.

Posted: **Fri Jan 08, 2016 4:56 pm**

This is getting very hypothetical. I'd rather just wait and see what Zebra says

.

Posted: **Fri Jan 08, 2016 5:45 pm**

I do not have info. Nor am I bussing Matt.

Posted: **Fri Jan 08, 2016 5:51 pm**

Scotty wrote:I wonder what nutella thinks about all this game stuff.

I too am interested in whether Zebra has info. I might decide to vote for Matt with that hope, but I'm kinda skeptical about him. I still have an odd hunch about Floyd, and tentatively also Long Con, but idk how to explain it. I guess I'm tired of overanalyzing and manufacturing suspicions and would rather listen to my gut unless something more convincing comes up.

linki @ zebra hmm okay

Posted: **Fri Jan 08, 2016 5:57 pm**

If I got info why would my flip-flop occur immediately after DFaraday's flip?

Posted: **Fri Jan 08, 2016 6:57 pm**

Typhoony wrote:
Epignosis wrote: Tuft-Head is probably not bad. I am confident that the probability that he is bad is 25%- the same as it is for everybody.
Technically it is higher than 25% or lower than 25%, since you know if you yourself are bad or not.

I said I took a math class once. I didn't say I had a good teacher.

Posted: **Fri Jan 08, 2016 7:13 pm**

The Striped Crusader is voting because Danny Boy ended up good and somehow that makes Matt bad.

Pretty Boy Floyd is voting because he thinks Matt is going hard for Bullzeye for strategic reasons like I did once in the forest (even though I was a pretty damn good boar hunter, as I said before).

Bully Boy is 99.99% sure Matt is bad because he says Matt was being disingenuous with a joking suspicion after Matt really suspected him for setting up a five-way tie.

Ty Fighter is voting because The Striped Crusader told him to.

Someone Who Sounds Very Familiar To Me But I Can't Quite Put My Finger On Where I've Heard of Him Before is voting because The Striped Crusader has put his reputation on the line.

Do I have that right?

Posted: **Fri Jan 08, 2016 7:19 pm**

The Striped Crusader, I quite like it.

Posted: **Fri Jan 08, 2016 7:36 pm**

I don't like my nickname. Can I have another?

Also, I don't think I will vote either Matt of Zebra today.

Posted: **Fri Jan 08, 2016 7:37 pm**

Who then?

Posted: **Fri Jan 08, 2016 7:38 pm**

Typhoony wrote:I don't like my nickname. Can I have another?

Also, I don't think I will vote either Matt of Zebra today.

It's better than what I was working toward earlier. "Typhoony" sounds like a toilet cleaning product to me.

Posted: **Fri Jan 08, 2016 7:42 pm**

Epignosis wrote:
Typhoony wrote:I don't like my nickname. Can I have another?

Also, I don't think I will vote either Matt of Zebra today.
It's better than what I was working toward earlier. "Typhoony" sounds like a toilet cleaning product to me.

I'm really good at getting rid of people who are full of shit, so that would fit.

@ Zebra: I don't know. I have players I'd rather not vote, I'm working my way towards players I am comfortable voting.

Posted: **Fri Jan 08, 2016 7:44 pm**

Typhoony wrote:
Epignosis wrote:
Typhoony wrote:I don't like my nickname. Can I have another?

Also, I don't think I will vote either Matt of Zebra today.
It's better than what I was working toward earlier. "Typhoony" sounds like a toilet cleaning product to me.
I'm really good at getting rid of people who are full of shit, so that would fit.

@ Zebra: I don't know. I have players I'd rather not vote, I'm working my way towards players I am comfortable voting.

SAVAGE

And I see.

Posted: **Fri Jan 08, 2016 8:09 pm**

I voted Sorsha for now. I feel like she's been putting in just enough effort to skirt by, but not enough effort to stand out.

Posted: **Fri Jan 08, 2016 11:11 pm**

Typhoony wrote:I voted Sorsha for now. I feel like she's been putting in just enough effort to skirt by, but not enough effort to stand out.

No U

I'm voting for SVS until I hear some suspicions from her. I feel like she's laying low lately (lately being today pretty much).

Posted: **Fri Jan 08, 2016 11:17 pm**

Sorsha wrote:
Typhoony wrote:I voted Sorsha for now. I feel like she's been putting in just enough effort to skirt by, but not enough effort to stand out.
No U

I'm voting for SVS until I hear some suspicions from her. I feel like she's laying low lately (lately being today pretty much).

Hey now, Absinthe. You didn't express one suspicion the first day on the island. Today you haven't expressed any either. You really only talked when it was dark and you ladies were scared and we strong menfolk had to go into the woods and get firewood so you could see.

I think you owe me a kiss.

Posted: **Fri Jan 08, 2016 11:47 pm**

Woah there Cowboy! I think you need to get your eyes checked. I have named suspicions. Matt day one. LC, nutella day two so far and now SVS. Zebra is raising some alarms also.

Posted: **Fri Jan 08, 2016 11:55 pm**

Sorsha wrote:Woah there Cowboy! I think you need to get your eyes checked. I have named suspicions. Matt day one. LC, nutella day two so far and now SVS. Zebra is raising some alarms also.

Matt? You just voted for him. You didn't say why. And you didn't express suspicion of this LC fella or nutella (nice rhyme, eh?) the second day. That was the first night, when it was dark and I got the wood, remember? Now if I'm wrong about that, you go have yourself a nice looksee and report back. Okay?

Giddy-up. Gone now.

Posted: **Sat Jan 09, 2016 12:16 am**

Yes I did explain why I found Matt suspicious on day one. You go have yourself another nice looksee.

And ok, you're right my suspicion of LC and nutella was from night one but it still stands for today since night one and day two are when we all talk about our day two lynch candidates.

Posted: **Sat Jan 09, 2016 12:21 am**

Sorsha wrote:Yes I did explain why I found Matt suspicious on day one. You go have yourself another nice looksee.

And ok, you're right my suspicion of LC and nutella was from night one but it still stands for today since night one and day two are when we all talk about our day two lynch candidates.

I already had:

Sorsha wrote:Going to make this a 4 way tie and vote for Matt, for now.

Sorsha wrote:@Matt- I didn't think you were picking on him. You just started out kinda jokey about the bullz thing then turned serious about it when no one was agreeing.

And...well that's it.

You voted him and then gave a reason. That ain't good politics darlin.

Posted: **Sat Jan 09, 2016 12:27 am**

I questioned him about his bullz suspicion before those posts... Guess you need another looksee.

Posted: **Sat Jan 09, 2016 12:40 am**

Sorsha wrote:I questioned him about his bullz suspicion before those posts... Guess you need another looksee.

No you didn't.

Sorsha wrote:
Matt wrote:If Bullz were lynched and ended up civvie, just know deep down he was really mafia and wanted a town loss. I'm surprised more players aren't aware of Bullzeye's consistent anti-town sentiment.

You seem like you're taking this lynch bullz a bit more seriously here whereas you were saying earlier it was more jokey.

That's not your questioning him. That's you expressing an opinion about what he "seems" to be doing. "Seems." How about just telling us what he is doing and take a stance?

All you did here was state a conclusion any objective viewer could reach, and coating it in "seem." YES Matt had a joking suspicion of Bullz, and YES Matt became really suspicious of Bullz. Why "you seem?"

Now where I come from "seem" is a bad word. My mama was with a man that seemed to be a good man, and lookiethere at what happened.

Do I need another looksee?

Posted: **Sat Jan 09, 2016 12:50 am**

Well I'm sorry my suspicions don't fit to your outline of how a suspicion should look but that is what it is.

I don't really care about your hang ups with the word "seem." Matt made a post that seemed like it was joking. Then he got serious about his suspicion when before it had "seemed" like he wasn't serious.

Posted: **Sat Jan 09, 2016 12:52 am**

Sorsha wrote:Well I'm sorry my suspicions don't fit to your outline of how a suspicion should look but that is what it is.

I don't really care about your hang ups with the word "seem." Matt made a post that seemed like it was joking. Then he got serious about his suspicion when before it had "seemed" like he wasn't serious.

And just what the hell is wrong with that?

Posted: **Sat Jan 09, 2016 12:56 am**

Exactly... what is wrong with that? Nothing. You're the one finding something wrong with it.

Posted: **Sat Jan 09, 2016 12:58 am**

The fact that Matt make a joke post about wanting to vote someone and once people weren't following his lead he turned it into a real suspicion. To me that was suspicious. like he just wanted bullz voted out but he had no good reason.

Posted: **Sat Jan 09, 2016 12:59 am**

Epignosis wrote:
Sorsha wrote:Matt made a post that seemed like it was joking. Then he got serious about his suspicion when before it had "seemed" like he wasn't serious.
And just what the hell is wrong with that?

Posted: **Sat Jan 09, 2016 1:00 am**

Day one and my vote for someone fucking sucked, sue me ok Epi, its day fucking one.

Posted: **Sat Jan 09, 2016 1:00 am**

Sorsha wrote:The fact that Matt make a joke post about wanting to vote someone and once people weren't following his lead he turned it into a real suspicion. To me that was suspicious. like he just wanted bullz voted out but he had no good reason.

No Mafia does that. Ever. Sorry Sweet Pea. Gonna have to vote you.

Posted: **Sat Jan 09, 2016 1:00 am**

Sorsha wrote:Day one and my vote for someone fucking sucked, sue me ok Epi, its day fucking one.

Mama never liked those words. Now I know why.

Posted: **Sat Jan 09, 2016 1:04 am**

No mafia ever does that. Right. Ok. Thanks for the education Epi.

Vote for me all you want Epi, when have you ever been right about me? Not once that I can remember.

Posted: **Sat Jan 09, 2016 1:06 am**

I guess I should just random vote like you n day one. What was your reason for voting nutella again? I had a looksee and couldn't find one.

The Syndicate

Lost Again Mafia (season 1) - Day 6

Re: Lost Again Mafia (season 1) - Day 2

Re: Lost Again Mafia (season 1) - Day 2

Re: Lost Again Mafia (season 1) - Day 2

Re: Lost Again Mafia (season 1) - Day 2

Re: Lost Again Mafia (season 1) - Day 2

Re: Lost Again Mafia (season 1) - Day 2

Re: Lost Again Mafia (season 1) - Day 2

Re: Lost Again Mafia (season 1) - Day 2

Re: Lost Again Mafia (season 1) - Day 2

Re: Lost Again Mafia (season 1) - Day 2

Re: Lost Again Mafia (season 1) - Day 2

Re: Lost Again Mafia (season 1) - Day 2

Re: Lost Again Mafia (season 1) - Day 2

Re: Lost Again Mafia (season 1) - Day 2

Re: Lost Again Mafia (season 1) - Day 2

Re: Lost Again Mafia (season 1) - Day 2

Re: Lost Again Mafia (season 1) - Day 2

Re: Lost Again Mafia (season 1) - Day 2

Re: Lost Again Mafia (season 1) - Day 2

Re: Lost Again Mafia (season 1) - Day 2

Re: Lost Again Mafia (season 1) - Day 2

Re: Lost Again Mafia (season 1) - Day 2

Re: Lost Again Mafia (season 1) - Day 2

Re: Lost Again Mafia (season 1) - Day 2

Re: Lost Again Mafia (season 1) - Day 2

Re: Lost Again Mafia (season 1) - Day 2

Re: Lost Again Mafia (season 1) - Day 2

Re: Lost Again Mafia (season 1) - Day 2

Re: Lost Again Mafia (season 1) - Day 2

Re: Lost Again Mafia (season 1) - Day 2

Re: Lost Again Mafia (season 1) - Day 2

Re: Lost Again Mafia (season 1) - Day 2

Re: Lost Again Mafia (season 1) - Day 2

Re: Lost Again Mafia (season 1) - Day 2

Re: Lost Again Mafia (season 1) - Day 2

Re: Lost Again Mafia (season 1) - Day 2

Re: Lost Again Mafia (season 1) - Day 2

Re: Lost Again Mafia (season 1) - Day 2

Re: Lost Again Mafia (season 1) - Day 2

Re: Lost Again Mafia (season 1) - Day 2

Re: Lost Again Mafia (season 1) - Day 2

Re: Lost Again Mafia (season 1) - Day 2

Re: Lost Again Mafia (season 1) - Day 2

Re: Lost Again Mafia (season 1) - Day 2

Re: Lost Again Mafia (season 1) - Day 2

Re: Lost Again Mafia (season 1) - Day 2

Re: Lost Again Mafia (season 1) - Day 2

Re: Lost Again Mafia (season 1) - Day 2

Re: Lost Again Mafia (season 1) - Day 2

Re: Lost Again Mafia (season 1) - Day 2