Murder, Mayhem, and Mafia
https://www.mafiathesyndicate.com/
If the mafia is looking for the cop and kill a player who gave a green check, that means the green check was a civilian. If they hit a fake cop, it doesn't break the logic that the check was accurate, even if it wasn't real.Ricochet wrote:I am confused even more than I usually am in math classes by the equation that mafia killing a green peener who just smokescreened (so no actual info) = the smokescreener's peen being cleared as civilian.
Still confused.Turnip Head wrote:If the mafia is looking for the cop and kill a player who gave a green check, that means the green check was a civilian. If they hit a fake cop, it doesn't break the logic that the check was accurate, even if it wasn't real.Ricochet wrote:I am confused even more than I usually am in math classes by the equation that mafia killing a green peener who just smokescreened (so no actual info) = the smokescreener's peen being cleared as civilian.
If the mafia is looking for the cop and kill a player who gave a green check, that means the green check was a civilian. If they hit a fake cop, it doesn't break the logic that the check was accurate, even if it wasn't real.Ricochet wrote:Still confused.Turnip Head wrote:If the mafia is looking for the cop and kill a player who gave a green check, that means the green check was a civilian. If they hit a fake cop, it doesn't break the logic that the check was accurate, even if it wasn't real.Ricochet wrote:I am confused even more than I usually am in math classes by the equation that mafia killing a green peener who just smokescreened (so no actual info) = the smokescreener's peen being cleared as civilian.
Still confused.Turnip Head wrote:If the mafia is looking for the cop and kill a player who gave a green check, that means the green check was a civilian. If they hit a fake cop, it doesn't break the logic that the check was accurate, even if it wasn't real.Ricochet wrote:Still confused.Turnip Head wrote:If the mafia is looking for the cop and kill a player who gave a green check, that means the green check was a civilian. If they hit a fake cop, it doesn't break the logic that the check was accurate, even if it wasn't real.Ricochet wrote:I am confused even more than I usually am in math classes by the equation that mafia killing a green peener who just smokescreened (so no actual info) = the smokescreener's peen being cleared as civilian.
That's because the risk of leaving the cop alive and avoiding seer hunt clear is not even close to being as good of a NK thought process as trying to kill a suspected cop.Turnip Head wrote:That's exactly what I said and it sounded like you disagreed with meMovingPictures07 wrote:On the next... Arrested Development:
The narrator breaks the fourth wall, and speculates that if he *had* killed Ann, he would have done it to avoid a situation of "seer hunt clear", and only then.
A "seer hunt clear" would be a situation in which the mafia kills one of the five players who claimed a n0 green peek, that player flipped vanilla civilian, and then the player that they claimed as a n0 green peek would be a confirmed vanilla civilian, and the cop would still be at large.
Oh boy. I know these new glasses only seem to make my vision worse but now I'm hearing voices demanding explanations of myself? I guess I fit into this family after all.MovingPictures07 wrote:On the next... Arrested Development:
G-Man, Metalmarsh89, and Sorsha will explain (1) their votes for Sloonei and (2) why they did not believe DrWilgy's peek on Sloonei was legitimate.
Rico, and anyone else who's still confused, think of it as if you're the mafia and you're hunting for the copTurnip Head wrote:If the mafia is looking for the cop and kill a player who gave a green check, that means the green check was a civilian. If they hit a fake cop, it doesn't break the logic that the check was accurate, even if it wasn't real.Ricochet wrote:Still confused.Turnip Head wrote:If the mafia is looking for the cop and kill a player who gave a green check, that means the green check was a civilian. If they hit a fake cop, it doesn't break the logic that the check was accurate, even if it wasn't real.Ricochet wrote:I am confused even more than I usually am in math classes by the equation that mafia killing a green peener who just smokescreened (so no actual info) = the smokescreener's peen being cleared as civilian.
And per the underlined, well, I agree. But that happened, that's what they did. Avoiding SHC Night 1 =/= avoiding it every night. All they've done is establish a precedent that their kills are not necessarily driven by looking for the cop.MovingPictures07 wrote:That's because the risk of leaving the cop alive and avoiding seer hunt clear is not even close to being as good of a NK thought process as trying to kill a suspected cop.Turnip Head wrote:That's exactly what I said and it sounded like you disagreed with meMovingPictures07 wrote:On the next... Arrested Development:
The narrator breaks the fourth wall, and speculates that if he *had* killed Ann, he would have done it to avoid a situation of "seer hunt clear", and only then.
A "seer hunt clear" would be a situation in which the mafia kills one of the five players who claimed a n0 green peek, that player flipped vanilla civilian, and then the player that they claimed as a n0 green peek would be a confirmed vanilla civilian, and the cop would still be at large.
If the mafia try to avoid SHC every night, eventually the cop will just solve the game.
Ooh. That's a rad explanation. \o/MovingPictures07 wrote:Rico, and anyone else who's still confused, think of it as if you're the mafia and you're hunting for the copTurnip Head wrote:If the mafia is looking for the cop and kill a player who gave a green check, that means the green check was a civilian. If they hit a fake cop, it doesn't break the logic that the check was accurate, even if it wasn't real.Ricochet wrote:Still confused.Turnip Head wrote:If the mafia is looking for the cop and kill a player who gave a green check, that means the green check was a civilian. If they hit a fake cop, it doesn't break the logic that the check was accurate, even if it wasn't real.Ricochet wrote:I am confused even more than I usually am in math classes by the equation that mafia killing a green peener who just smokescreened (so no actual info) = the smokescreener's peen being cleared as civilian.
"Let's kill Player A, they seem like they could be the cop" -- IMPLICIT in this statement is the assumption that the peek (Player B) that Player A threw out absolutely must be civilian, because if Player B is mafia, then then mafia would know with 100% certainty that Player A instead was a vanilla civilian who fake peeked a mafia to try to provide cover for the cop and guessed incorrectly.
So if the mafia kill Player A who peeked Player B as green, and that Player A dies and flips vanilla civilian, then implicit in that NK decision is the assumption that the mafia knew that Player B was a civilian, because otherwise they wouldn't have killed Player A in looking for the cop.
Right now I'm currently burning Spacedaisy's butt.Turnip Head wrote:I don't know how to analyze posts and votes at this stage. Voting patterns in general are difficult to analyze without a mafia flip, especially with a spread out vote. On top of that everyone has stuck mostly in character. Like I said earlier very few people have made waves which makes it easy for the baddies to blend into the crowd.
Does anyone currently present want to make some pressure votes with me? Let's put someone in the hot seat.
I'm game.MovingPictures07 wrote:Right now I'm currently burning Spacedaisy's butt.Turnip Head wrote:I don't know how to analyze posts and votes at this stage. Voting patterns in general are difficult to analyze without a mafia flip, especially with a spread out vote. On top of that everyone has stuck mostly in character. Like I said earlier very few people have made waves which makes it easy for the baddies to blend into the crowd.
Does anyone currently present want to make some pressure votes with me? Let's put someone in the hot seat.
Was it just the three of us who voted for Sloonei?MovingPictures07 wrote:On the next... Arrested Development:
G-Man, Metalmarsh89, and Sorsha will explain (1) their votes for Sloonei and (2) why they did not believe DrWilgy's peek on Sloonei was legitimate.
Elohcin, thellama73, and Ricochet will explain why (1) their votes for lovedelic and (2) why they did not believe Spacedaisy's peek on lovedelic was legitimate.
lovedelic and Spacedaisy will explain why (1) their votes for thellama73 and (2) why they did not believe Ricochet's peek on thellama73 was legitimate.
Spacedaisy will explain why she voted for me, then moved my vote without responding to my inquiry and acknowledging the switch.
It's possible one of these peeks is real. So why did all of these votes land like this?
You know you're going to have to go on a diet if you ever hope to find another suitable husband.DrWilgy wrote:You can do what you want as far as I'm concerned.Spacedaisy wrote:Well that's just great, now my dad's dead and I'm stuck with my mother, I wonder if I could get emaciated. Move out on my own...
Hey GMan, I hear that new French cousins movie is playing, you want to catch the matinee? Might give us the chance to talk about who you think might be bad.
Why did y'all kill my husband? I left to go shopping only to come back and see him dead!
(why am I a girl?)
Only 8 posts. I see lots of roleplaying, then calling you out for roleplaying, which is hypocritical but not necessarily suspicious. She played along pretending to be the cop to give me cover, which was nice, but checks are also easy for bad guys to fake.MovingPictures07 wrote:Turnip Head, go back and ISO Daisy for me if you don't mind. What do you make of her D1 behavior?
The three of you + Turnip Head.Sorsha wrote:Was it just the three of us who voted for Sloonei?MovingPictures07 wrote:On the next... Arrested Development:
G-Man, Metalmarsh89, and Sorsha will explain (1) their votes for Sloonei and (2) why they did not believe DrWilgy's peek on Sloonei was legitimate.
Elohcin, thellama73, and Ricochet will explain why (1) their votes for lovedelic and (2) why they did not believe Spacedaisy's peek on lovedelic was legitimate.
lovedelic and Spacedaisy will explain why (1) their votes for thellama73 and (2) why they did not believe Ricochet's peek on thellama73 was legitimate.
Spacedaisy will explain why she voted for me, then moved my vote without responding to my inquiry and acknowledging the switch.
It's possible one of these peeks is real. So why did all of these votes land like this?
He can't be picking on my poor baby Buster.
What do you think happened in this game? Have you identified any leads?Sorsha wrote:You know you're going to have to go on a diet if you ever hope to find another suitable husband.DrWilgy wrote:You can do what you want as far as I'm concerned.Spacedaisy wrote:Well that's just great, now my dad's dead and I'm stuck with my mother, I wonder if I could get emaciated. Move out on my own...
Hey GMan, I hear that new French cousins movie is playing, you want to catch the matinee? Might give us the chance to talk about who you think might be bad.
Why did y'all kill my husband? I left to go shopping only to come back and see him dead!
(why am I a girl?)
:gulps down her vodka martini and immediately begins to fix another:
Of course its a good idea to look at the players who voted the lynched civ and the other "green peeks" but at this stage of the game it's a piece of cake for the mafia to sit back, pop a single vote on a player and watch the other civs tear each other apart.
Isn't that too WIFOMy though? You willing to place a vote behind that thought?G-Man wrote:I think it's quite possible that either GOB or Pop Pop could be one of the killers. I think it helps explain the voting focus on just three people instead of staying more spread out. I have to put in a shift at the banana stand now, so it looks like I won't be able to go to that movie, Maeby.
How is that WIFOMy? I've explained my theory on the possibility of GOB, Lucille, and Steve. I'm just expanding it to include the other person receiving three votes.MovingPictures07 wrote:Isn't that too WIFOMy though? You willing to place a vote behind that thought?G-Man wrote:I think it's quite possible that either GOB or Pop Pop could be one of the killers. I think it helps explain the voting focus on just three people instead of staying more spread out. I have to put in a shift at the banana stand now, so it looks like I won't be able to go to that movie, Maeby.
Actually the vote was not as spread out as I thought it was, only three players had token votes on another player at the EoD. You, Wilgy and zebra. I'd have my money on either you or Wilgy being bad. If my family had any money left that is.... not that I had anything to do with that...MovingPictures07 wrote:The three of you + Turnip Head.Sorsha wrote:Was it just the three of us who voted for Sloonei?MovingPictures07 wrote:On the next... Arrested Development:
G-Man, Metalmarsh89, and Sorsha will explain (1) their votes for Sloonei and (2) why they did not believe DrWilgy's peek on Sloonei was legitimate.
Elohcin, thellama73, and Ricochet will explain why (1) their votes for lovedelic and (2) why they did not believe Spacedaisy's peek on lovedelic was legitimate.
lovedelic and Spacedaisy will explain why (1) their votes for thellama73 and (2) why they did not believe Ricochet's peek on thellama73 was legitimate.
Spacedaisy will explain why she voted for me, then moved my vote without responding to my inquiry and acknowledging the switch.
It's possible one of these peeks is real. So why did all of these votes land like this?
He can't be picking on my poor baby Buster.
What do you think happened in this game? Have you identified any leads?Sorsha wrote:You know you're going to have to go on a diet if you ever hope to find another suitable husband.DrWilgy wrote:You can do what you want as far as I'm concerned.Spacedaisy wrote:Well that's just great, now my dad's dead and I'm stuck with my mother, I wonder if I could get emaciated. Move out on my own...
Hey GMan, I hear that new French cousins movie is playing, you want to catch the matinee? Might give us the chance to talk about who you think might be bad.
Why did y'all kill my husband? I left to go shopping only to come back and see him dead!
(why am I a girl?)
:gulps down her vodka martini and immediately begins to fix another:
Of course its a good idea to look at the players who voted the lynched civ and the other "green peeks" but at this stage of the game it's a piece of cake for the mafia to sit back, pop a single vote on a player and watch the other civs tear each other apart.
It's an interesting theory, but it's entirely speculative and just as likely that any or all of those players are civilian and the mafia stayed out of the limelight completely yesterday. I don't think it's strong enough.G-Man wrote:How is that WIFOMy? I've explained my theory on the possibility of GOB, Lucille, and Steve. I'm just expanding it to include the other person receiving three votes.MovingPictures07 wrote:Isn't that too WIFOMy though? You willing to place a vote behind that thought?G-Man wrote:I think it's quite possible that either GOB or Pop Pop could be one of the killers. I think it helps explain the voting focus on just three people instead of staying more spread out. I have to put in a shift at the banana stand now, so it looks like I won't be able to go to that movie, Maeby.
You're that confident that a mafia member threw off a vote?Sorsha wrote:Actually the vote was not as spread out as I thought it was, only three players had token votes on another player at the EoD. You, Wilgy and zebra. I'd have my money on either you or Wilgy being bad. If my family had any money left that is.... not that I had anything to do with that...MovingPictures07 wrote:What do you think happened in this game? Have you identified any leads?Sorsha wrote:
You know you're going to have to go on a diet if you ever hope to find another suitable husband.
:gulps down her vodka martini and immediately begins to fix another:
Of course its a good idea to look at the players who voted the lynched civ and the other "green peeks" but at this stage of the game it's a piece of cake for the mafia to sit back, pop a single vote on a player and watch the other civs tear each other apart.
:sips martini and looks away:
Why not keep? Keep your hands clean and out of the lynch.MovingPictures07 wrote:You're that confident that a mafia member threw off a vote?Sorsha wrote:Actually the vote was not as spread out as I thought it was, only three players had token votes on another player at the EoD. You, Wilgy and zebra. I'd have my money on either you or Wilgy being bad. If my family had any money left that is.... not that I had anything to do with that...MovingPictures07 wrote:What do you think happened in this game? Have you identified any leads?Sorsha wrote:
You know you're going to have to go on a diet if you ever hope to find another suitable husband.
:gulps down her vodka martini and immediately begins to fix another:
Of course its a good idea to look at the players who voted the lynched civ and the other "green peeks" but at this stage of the game it's a piece of cake for the mafia to sit back, pop a single vote on a player and watch the other civs tear each other apart.
:sips martini and looks away:
You don't have any read on whether anyone is reading sincerely or not?
And what did his reaction tell you? I'm guessing it satisfied you since you changed your vote. What do you think of him putting the pressure on you today? Is he trying to get you out of the way before you find him out or something else?Spacedaisy wrote:I voted for that annoying voice over guy and gave him a hard time because of the same reason you guys are on me right now. I wanted to see what kind of reaction he would give. And I switched my vote because I decided to put pressure somewhere else. So I did, then I forgot when the vote ended and that was where my vote stayed as a result. But I don't mind. Remember lovedelic was my green peek, so why wouldn't I vote the same way he did?
You think I was annoying?Spacedaisy wrote:I voted for that annoying voice over guy and gave him a hard time because of the same reason you guys are on me right now. I wanted to see what kind of reaction he would give. And I switched my vote because I decided to put pressure somewhere else. So I did, then I forgot when the vote ended and that was where my vote stayed as a result. But I don't mind. Remember lovedelic was my green peek, so why wouldn't I vote the same way he did?
Why not vote for Sloonei using roleplay as justification? Look at all that heat you're getting. You can literally argue "why ____?" or "why not _____" with regards to any potential mafia strategy for voting on D1. You're going to have to give me more than that.Sorsha wrote:Why not keep? Keep your hands clean and out of the lynch.MovingPictures07 wrote:You're that confident that a mafia member threw off a vote?Sorsha wrote:Actually the vote was not as spread out as I thought it was, only three players had token votes on another player at the EoD. You, Wilgy and zebra. I'd have my money on either you or Wilgy being bad. If my family had any money left that is.... not that I had anything to do with that...MovingPictures07 wrote:What do you think happened in this game? Have you identified any leads?Sorsha wrote:
You know you're going to have to go on a diet if you ever hope to find another suitable husband.
:gulps down her vodka martini and immediately begins to fix another:
Of course its a good idea to look at the players who voted the lynched civ and the other "green peeks" but at this stage of the game it's a piece of cake for the mafia to sit back, pop a single vote on a player and watch the other civs tear each other apart.
:sips martini and looks away:
You don't have any read on whether anyone is reading sincerely or not?
I think you're all a bunch of ungrateful, lying ingrates. Except my Buster.
And what did his reaction tell you? I'm guessing it satisfied you since you changed your vote. What do you think of him putting the pressure on you today? Is he trying to get you out of the way before you find him out or something else?Spacedaisy wrote:I voted for that annoying voice over guy and gave him a hard time because of the same reason you guys are on me right now. I wanted to see what kind of reaction he would give. And I switched my vote because I decided to put pressure somewhere else. So I did, then I forgot when the vote ended and that was where my vote stayed as a result. But I don't mind. Remember lovedelic was my green peek, so why wouldn't I vote the same way he did?
Both are true. I voted him to put pressure on him and was ok with it as well because lovedelic was already there. Plus two votes applies more pressure than one.MovingPictures07 wrote:You think I was annoying?Spacedaisy wrote:I voted for that annoying voice over guy and gave him a hard time because of the same reason you guys are on me right now. I wanted to see what kind of reaction he would give. And I switched my vote because I decided to put pressure somewhere else. So I did, then I forgot when the vote ended and that was where my vote stayed as a result. But I don't mind. Remember lovedelic was my green peek, so why wouldn't I vote the same way he did?
Why didn't you give that explanation earlier? Also, your last statement is quasi ex-post facto; you give a justification for being OK with your vote, when in reality you said you decided to apply pressure and then you forgot the vote ended so that's where your vote stayed.
So did you vote for thellama73 to put pressure on him, or because lovedelic did?
I also find it perplexing you don't mention Sloonei at all. You had no thoughts on any players, including him or llama?
I'd say it'd be a loaded question if I left the "or something else" off of the end. The first part is just what jumps to mind when I think of you and daisy going against each other. As spouses I think you'd read each other better than most others in the game. So anytime one spouse goes against the other in a game, like you are to her, it makes me wonder why. Do you really believe she is bad, or do you just want her taken out before she finds out you are bad? Of course, the third side of the coin is that you're both civ but I'd like to hear SD's take on it before I decide if it's that.MovingPictures07 wrote:Why not vote for Sloonei using roleplay as justification? Look at all that heat you're getting. You can literally argue "why ____?" or "why not _____" with regards to any potential mafia strategy for voting on D1. You're going to have to give me more than that.Sorsha wrote:Why not keep? Keep your hands clean and out of the lynch.MovingPictures07 wrote:You're that confident that a mafia member threw off a vote?Sorsha wrote:Actually the vote was not as spread out as I thought it was, only three players had token votes on another player at the EoD. You, Wilgy and zebra. I'd have my money on either you or Wilgy being bad. If my family had any money left that is.... not that I had anything to do with that...MovingPictures07 wrote:What do you think happened in this game? Have you identified any leads?Sorsha wrote:
You know you're going to have to go on a diet if you ever hope to find another suitable husband.
:gulps down her vodka martini and immediately begins to fix another:
Of course its a good idea to look at the players who voted the lynched civ and the other "green peeks" but at this stage of the game it's a piece of cake for the mafia to sit back, pop a single vote on a player and watch the other civs tear each other apart.
:sips martini and looks away:
You don't have any read on whether anyone is reading sincerely or not?
I think you're all a bunch of ungrateful, lying ingrates. Except my Buster.
And what did his reaction tell you? I'm guessing it satisfied you since you changed your vote. What do you think of him putting the pressure on you today? Is he trying to get you out of the way before you find him out or something else?Spacedaisy wrote:I voted for that annoying voice over guy and gave him a hard time because of the same reason you guys are on me right now. I wanted to see what kind of reaction he would give. And I switched my vote because I decided to put pressure somewhere else. So I did, then I forgot when the vote ended and that was where my vote stayed as a result. But I don't mind. Remember lovedelic was my green peek, so why wouldn't I vote the same way he did?
Also, the underlined is a loaded question, and worthy of suspicion.
:raises martini glass in a wave goodbye:MovingPictures07 wrote:On that note, Sorsha
And I'm out of here, be back probably tomorrow evening.
Maybe Buster was my green peek and I was trying to be subtle about it.MovingPictures07 wrote:Thanks Daisy, appreciate the response.
Regarding the "why not vote for Sloonei using roleplay as justification?", to clarify, I was poking at Sorsha's vote, which was as unsubstantiated as the D1 votes could get (she was "protecting Buster"). Hers is far from the only unsubstantiated, but I find it a bit narrow-minded of her to commit to such strong interpretations of a mafia strategy for D1 votes, when it's just as likely that mafia could have used roleplay to avoid justification for their vote as it is that they threw off to avoid the main wagons.
I did explain my vote. And no, I didn't find Spacedaisy's green peek believable. If I remember correctly, she came in after the subject had already been talked about a lot. Perhaps she was trying to jump in on giving a green peek to distract the baddies from finding out who the real cop was. Which is a good think imo. I mean, aren't we supposed to try and keep our cop hidden? Are we even doing ourselves any good talking about the cop. I think we should look to who would have killed Zebra. I think a good cop gets their read and then tries to build a case on that player being civ or baddie. Saying, "i got a green peek on so-and-so" is a bit damaging to ones self.MovingPictures07 wrote:On the next... Arrested Development:
Elohcin, thellama73, and Ricochet will explain why (1) their votes for lovedelic and (2) why they did not believe Spacedaisy's peek on lovedelic was legitimate.
ooo, good question. This will get our heads in a good place for hunting baddies.Turnip Head wrote:MP07, if you had killed a2thezebra, why would you have done it?
Back to the post before this one...If I had killed Zebra it would have been because she posted in a color I couldn't read.Turnip Head wrote:I guess, in a way, the mafia have avoided the concept of "seer hunt clear" altogether by taking Zeebs out Night 1. They have now established that their kills may not be based on hunting for the cop, so if they hit a vanilla with cop cover later in the game, those green checks are not automatically validated.
It's a clever strategy if true. I can only think of a few players who might think of doing something like that.
I don't even understand what TH is saying here about hitting a vanilla with a cop cover ad green checks not automatically validated. Can you explain? I thought this was a simple game, no secrets.
G - do you have a spreadsheet of who's who or something? If so, do you think you could share it with the class. I am unable to understand yours posts b/c I don't know who the heck you're talking about half the time.Spacedaisy wrote:I voted for that annoying voice over guy and gave him a hard time because of the same reason you guys are on me right now. I wanted to see what kind of reaction he would give. And I switched my vote because I decided to put pressure somewhere else. So I did, then I forgot when the vote ended and that was where my vote stayed as a result. But I don't mind. Remember lovedelic was my green peek, so why wouldn't I vote the same way he did?
A green peek is where the cop peeks at a player and finds out he/she is civ. A red peek is when the sop finds out the person he peeked is bad.lovedelic wrote:are green peeks just predictions that may or may not be made by a cop
It's not our job to find the cop, it's the bad guys' job. The cop will reveal himself/herself to us when the time is right. A mix of obvious checks and subtle ones will make their job more difficult. The real cop might choose to go the subtle route for instance, and if a vanilla civ also pretends to leave a check through subtle methods, there's a higher chance of their check being legit cleared if that vanilla is killed for it.Elohcin wrote:I think we're all forgetting that it's possible that the cop never said anything about his peek. Perhaps every person who provided a green peek isn't the cop. Just sayin'. (Ha, and I see G-man agrees.)
Then again it could also make sense that the cop is among one of those who gave a green peek. I don't think I fully understood the importance of what TH (I think it was TH) was saying yesterday when he was saying we ought to be more discreet with blabbering the peek, or something like that.
Right....and I think I said in my post (or at least was thinking it) that we ought not talk too much about it but get our heads into finding baddies and thinking who might be responsible for such a kill.Turnip Head wrote:It's not our job to find the cop, it's the bad guys' job. The cop will reveal himself/herself to us when the time is right. A mix of obvious checks and subtle ones will make their job more difficult. The real cop might choose to go the subtle route for instance, and if a vanilla civ also pretends to leave a check through subtle methods, there's a higher chance of their check being legit cleared if that vanilla is killed for it.Elohcin wrote:I think we're all forgetting that it's possible that the cop never said anything about his peek. Perhaps every person who provided a green peek isn't the cop. Just sayin'. (Ha, and I see G-man agrees.)
Then again it could also make sense that the cop is among one of those who gave a green peek. I don't think I fully understood the importance of what TH (I think it was TH) was saying yesterday when he was saying we ought to be more discreet with blabbering the peek, or something like that.
But honestly the more we talk about it the less of an advantage it gives us. We kinda just need to wing it.
Not sure whether to be pinged by your big post Elo. I appreciate your contributions, but it also seems slightly out of character for you.
Yeah, but you were bad in that oneElohcin wrote:Also, your response to my post is the same response I got in the last game I played.
And had me completely fooled.
Turnip Head wrote:Yeah, but you were bad in that oneElohcin wrote:Also, your response to my post is the same response I got in the last game I played.
I believe you when you say you're better at these smaller games. I also believe you're better at being bad in them
You are probably right that I was bad. I honestly don't keep that info in my grain after it's over. I couldn't even tell you the name of that game. My mind is constantly having to hold new information for this and that and once its over, I let it go. Same thing with my business. Ask me anything about the cakes I have to do this week and I can tell you -flavors, sizes, decorations. Ask me what I have next week, I have no clue until after Saturday when this week's cakes are complete and I've looked at the order forms for next week so I can make a grocery list.
in my brain*