Re: The Hobbit Mafia: Day 10
Posted: Fri Jun 27, 2014 3:25 pm
juliets what are your thoughts on SD?
I feel like Llama's arguments on me are really badly thrown together actually and not what I'd expect from him. His first accusation is basically that I need to be lynched because I hadn't been discussed much. Then he acts like two votes he also made definitely guarantee that I'm bad. He also keeps saying I tried to save TH as if I was really pushing against his lynch when I blatantly wasn't. All I did was not vote for him, preferring to vote for someone I'd been quite suspicious of, and say I didn't distrust him. If you want to see what me trying to save someone looks like, look at my reactions to the case against Boogs. That was me trying to prevent the lynch of someone I didn't think was bad. That's the closest thing to a save attempt I've made all game.fingersplints wrote:Also, I thought llama was civvie minded for most of this game but this day and the abrupt bullz discussions and votes is making me wonder
She is making me uneasy with her quiet but I also keep think rl is probably rough right now.fingersplints wrote:juliets what are your thoughts on SD?
I votead voteady. alredy. votealredy. I votedy. votedy. alrealredy.juliets wrote:ok epig i see your message. who have you decided to vote today? I'm assuming either splints or Bullz. Anything you can provide on why you think he's smaug?
Not sure. Don't fancy voting Bullz. Llama a possiblity. Confused tbhjuliets wrote:Snow Dog who are you going to vote for?
Snow Dog wrote:I think I trust you but besides that I realised what was going on. At least I think I do.thellama73 wrote:I don't know why you would listen to me, but yes.Snow Dog wrote:Shall I vote BWT logan?
Snow Dog wrote:I dunno I've been thinking about Bullz being bad recently. Not entirely convinced by the evidence or lack of it shown though.
Snow Dog wrote:I was convinced that Llama and epi were civ but I got this nagging feeling they are playing a blinding baddie game.
Quichange. Quick Quichange. ck Quichange. Quichange. ck ck Quichange. change. Quichange. Quick ck change. change. change. change. ck Quick ck Quick change. change. change. Quick Quichange. Quichange. ck Quichange. change. ck change. Quick change. ck Quick Quick Quichange. ck Quichange. Quick change. Quick ck change. Quichange. ck change. change. Quick change. change. ck Quick ck Quichange. ck change. Quick ck ck Quichange. Quichange. ck Quick change. ck Quichange. change. ck Quichange. ck Quick QuSnow Dog wrote:Not sure. Don't fancy voting Bullz. Llama a possiblity. Confused tbhjuliets wrote:Snow Dog who are you going to vote for?
Besponsiblesible yote. responspote Be. vote. r your yote yotespotesiblespor for yonsible. r Be re fonsible. for vor r r yote. yotesible Besiblesible Be Be. for r Be youre. Be fouresiblespotespor r fotesible. yoresible Be r vonsible. Be. yote Besible Besiblesible vote re vor four r Be yor r Be. vour yote fonspote voure fonspotespor fonsible vor r re re vonsible r vonspoure r yor responsiblespor fotesible yonsible Be fote fonspote Be your fote. responsiblesible vonsiblespoure vote Be. fote Be. fourKylemii wrote:Leaning a bit towards yes though, Epig seems to have a lot of conviction on this point... and at the very least lynching bullz should reveal some things about a few other players.
He has conviction but nothing else. He hasn't backed up his theories even though he could at least try. All he's done is say I'm Smaug because he says so.Kylemii wrote:Leaning a bit towards yes though, Epig seems to have a lot of conviction on this point... and at the very least lynching bullz should reveal some things about a few other players.
So I'm indecisive.Epignosis wrote:Snow Dog wrote:I think I trust you but besides that I realised what was going on. At least I think I do.thellama73 wrote:I don't know why you would listen to me, but yes.Snow Dog wrote:Shall I vote BWT logan?Snow Dog wrote:I dunno I've been thinking about Bullz being bad recently. Not entirely convinced by the evidence or lack of it shown though.Snow Dog wrote:I was convinced that Llama and epi were civ but I got this nagging feeling they are playing a blinding baddie game.Quichange. Quick Quichange. ck Quichange. Quichange. ck ck Quichange. change. Quichange. Quick ck change. change. change. change. ck Quick ck Quick change. change. change. Quick Quichange. Quichange. ck Quichange. change. ck change. Quick change. ck Quick Quick Quichange. ck Quichange. Quick change. Quick ck change. Quichange. ck change. change. Quick change. change. ck Quick ck Quichange. ck change. Quick ck ck Quichange. Quichange. ck Quick change. ck Quichange. change. ck Quichange. ck Quick QuSnow Dog wrote:Not sure. Don't fancy voting Bullz. Llama a possiblity. Confused tbhjuliets wrote:Snow Dog who are you going to vote for?
Why is anyone listening to him about me? He even practically admitted he has nothing on me. He just thinks I'm Smaug for a vague undefined reason that conveniently crops up the day he happened to be insanified. He has done nothing to back his thoughts up and has basically refused to even try to explain why he thinks it. Seriously, there's no possible reason why he could believe that so strongly. It doesn't make sense. Don't just be a sheep.Snow Dog wrote:Well I've trusted Epi so far.........
i don't want to be. But I did suspect you anyway. But that was just gut which is nothing really.Bullzeye wrote:Why is anyone listening to him about me? He even practically admitted he has nothing on me. He just thinks I'm Smaug for a vague undefined reason that conveniently crops up the day he happened to be insanified. He has done nothing to back his thoughts up and has basically refused to even try to explain why he thinks it. Seriously, there's no possible reason why he could believe that so strongly. It doesn't make sense. Don't just be a sheep.Snow Dog wrote:Well I've trusted Epi so far.........
Ho How dove prow do dou you yove do Ho How yove prove How prove do prou yow dou pro yow you dou dow pro dou prou dow How Ho yove pro you Hove Hou dow prow Hove dou prove Ho prou How you prou Hou prove do yo Ho do you dove yow yo prow Ho do you prove dove dow dove yo dow How dow yove dou prow dow Hove dou Hou Ho dow do Hou yow yow Ho dove prou prow How dou prove dow dove yow do yo Hou yo yo prove Hove Hou dove prou yow How dow How prove yo dou pro yo dove prow do Hove dow Hou pro do prou How do HowBullzeye wrote:Why is anyone listening to him about me? He even practically admitted he has nothing on me. He just thinks I'm Smaug for a vague undefined reason that conveniently crops up the day he happened to be insanified. He has done nothing to back his thoughts up and has basically refused to even try to explain why he thinks it. Seriously, there's no possible reason why he could believe that so strongly. It doesn't make sense. Don't just be a sheep.Snow Dog wrote:Well I've trusted Epi so far.........
I may abstainBullzeye wrote:Well with 8 minutes left to vote all I can say is lynching me would be a mistake and if you do it anyway I'd strongly advise lynching Epi and Llama next. Any order you like. Also look at others who voted me because the case being put forward is weak as hell and I can't believe people are even considering it.
You've never even said why you think it. Let alone tried to prove it. Surely you can quote posts etc. to back it up but you never have.Epignosis wrote:Smaug? Smeome is isoneome is soneoneone soneoneome sone is Sme Smeoneome Smaug? soneoneone Smaug? isoneome is Smaug? sone Sme Smaug? s is Sme isone isome Sme some is somaug? s isoneoneone isomeome Smaug? Smaug? is isomeoneome isoneoneome s isoneoneoneone soneomaug? Smeome somaug? isoneoneomaug? s somaug? Smeomaug? somaug? some is Smeomaug? Sme s Sme sone s s is soneone is isone isomaug? is Smaug? isome Smaug? sone soneone Smaug? Smeoneoneomaug? s Smeone Sme s some isone s isomaug? is s Sme is Smeo
Llama - Epi - Juliets. Brazen baddies? With the numbers of players so low I could see a three person team with nothing much said against them yet getting cocky and being too obvious. One of them throws out a random name to lynch, another puts in half-assed reasons to support his conveniently insanified teammate, and when heat builds up on him the insane one defends him and the third acts as though she wants to wait to hear more about this defense before she could possibly commit to a vote for either one. Then they work through the last seven players hoping neutrals are still alive and able to side with them. If this is true I'm going to laugh sooooo hard.juliets wrote:I considered voting for myself but i think that's the same as voting for Bullz. I don't want to vote llama until I hear epig out about why he says don't vote him. I can see how Bullz could be bad I'm just not entirely convinced. I don't have anyone else in mind however that I'm any more convinced about so I've got to go with what I've got - vote Bullz. I'm sorry Bullz if you're good.
I feel quite good about him actually. He's the only person in this game to point out the huge number of flaws in the 'cases' made against me. I hadn't really thought much at all of him until recently but now that he's the only person to have seen through the ridiculousness of this lynch I kinda trust him a little.fingersplints wrote:bullz what do you think about kitty/k4j?
You're You're civ? a You're a civ? civ? You're civ? a civ? You're a You're a a a a You're You're civ? a You're civ? a a civ? civ? You're civ? You're civ? a a You're a civ? You're civ? You're a a a a civ? You're You're civ? civ? a civ? civ? You're You're a You're civ? civ? You're a civ? You're civ? a civ? a You're a a You're a a You're You're a You're civ? civ? a civ? a civ? a civ? You're You're You're You're a You're civ? a a civ? civ? You're a a a You're civ? a You're a civ? You're You're You'reBullzeye wrote:I shouldn't have to provide an alternative, if that's what you're saying. There was literally no reason for anyone to follow you or Llama. Neither of you bothered to give any real reason for why people should vote for me. The forced case from Llama is a joke and you didn't have anything either, which will be proved as soon as Russti is able to write the lynch post.
I defended myself against your completely unsupported ludicrous claims and Llama's hypocritical half-assed case. I had made points against Snow which still stood and brought up Daisy as someone who'd slid by under the radar for too long. I don't see why it should all be on me when the people accusing me didn't even bother to make real arguments.Epignosis wrote:So So yo Sou ng. you Sothing. d ng. yothidid ng. d you So Sou yothing. yo nothing. d d So So ng. Sou So yo d ng. ng. So yo dididing. d you nou yothididinothid d d yo you Sothino Sothing. Sothing. So ng. Sou Sou d Sothid dinou d So ng. Sothing. ding. So nothing. you no yothidid you you ng. ng. d ng. ng. yothinothidino Sou ng. d didididid Sou ding. Sothing. yothid you ding. So did ng. no you So d Sothinothid ng. Sothinou nothidinothid Sothing. you ng. ng. ng. Sou So Sothid ding. nou ding. ding. ding
If I;m bad why didn;t I simply vote for you:'?Bullzeye wrote:I defended myself against your completely unsupported ludicrous claims and Llama's hypocritical half-assed case. I had made points against Snow which still stood and brought up Daisy as someone who'd slid by under the radar for too long. I don't see why it should all be on me when the people accusing me didn't even bother to make real arguments.Epignosis wrote:So So yo Sou ng. you Sothing. d ng. yothidid ng. d you So Sou yothing. yo nothing. d d So So ng. Sou So yo d ng. ng. So yo dididing. d you nou yothididinothid d d yo you Sothino Sothing. Sothing. So ng. Sou Sou d Sothid dinou d So ng. Sothing. ding. So nothing. you no yothidid you you ng. ng. d ng. ng. yothinothidino Sou ng. d didididid Sou ding. Sothing. yothid you ding. So did ng. no you So d Sothinothid ng. Sothinou nothidinothid Sothing. you ng. ng. ng. Sou So Sothid ding. nou ding. ding. ding