The Syndicate

LoRab wrote:

Metalmarsh89 wrote:

LoRab wrote:

Metalmarsh89 wrote:

Bullzeye wrote:I see MM had nothing to say in response to my re-explanation of why I find him suspicious. I also have a problem with his vote for LoRab, which he said was 'until she explains why she finds him suspicious'. She offered an explanation and his vote stuck, which makes me feel like it was basically just a NO U.

Now that's not fair. I haven't been on since then.

And as I said before, I wanted an answer from LoRab. I had asked before, and she didn't answer, so I knew a vote might get her attention more.

No, you didn't. I just read through all of your posts since I replaced in and do not see a post where you asked me. If I'm missing it, please link to where you asked me before.

Unless maybe you asked your teammates in BTSC why they thought I might suspect you?

My apologies, I did not remember correctly what I posted. This was all I had said.

If you meant that as a question or clarification, it really did not read that way. I'm still not sure why you say at the beginning of the lynch that I had never stated why I suspected you.

thellama73 wrote:Right, I have to go out so I am voting now. MetalMarsh's latest posts appealing to me for opinions and claiming he isn't scared of being lynched make me feel nervous about him, and I think Mongoose is unlikely to be bad, so I will vote for MM.

nijuukyugou wrote:Okay, back. Whew. Whirlwind today in the world of Real Life, and catching a brief moment before more guests arrive. SO.

Firstly, a belated RIP God (sorry about that, Lord/SVS - I really did think you were bad!) and RIP BWT.

Secondly, I've been seeing posts about Mongoose giving people baddie vibes throughout the game, but I don't see it. Her gameplay seems fairly normal to me, but perhaps I haven't played with her enough to know? I don't see her "red herring" comment to be out of the blue or a BTSC slip-up, as people are saying, although I would like to know more about what she's trying to say (but perhaps she just...can't? Possibility). I don't intend to put my vote there.

Out of the people on the list today, I think LC and MM are most likely to be bad that I can see. LC pinged me with the sudden outburst at llama for his BTSC/Chatzy comment and using that particular instance as his apparent time to go after him. He claims he's been after him under the radar since the beginning, but I didn't see it (probably because it was "under the radar," but if you feel it, say it). As for MM, I re-read him (and lordy, was it a re-read...so many posts :P ) and while in the beginning I wasn't seeing much wrong, especially with what people were using against him (the French comment, the Epi comments, etc., which I found relatively normal), his final adamant Made vote disturbed me because he had a pretty good reason to believe he was Lancelot, and said so, but still voted for him. LC did the same thing. Yeah, y'all weren't 100% sure, but you had good reason to believe he had a definite Civ role over others on the poll.

And now, MM claims he's not worried about being lynched. That's weird. That's really weird. Is it protection? Or assuming that people won't bother to vote for you? I'm going with MM.

And the amazing disappearing Blooper performs her tricks again, playing the good Party Host until later tonight. POOF!

Also, time for more beer. Oh so much more beer.

Metalmarsh89 wrote:
Probably because you never did, at least not before I asked today.

LoRab wrote:

Bullzeye wrote:

Metalmarsh89 wrote:

Bullzeye wrote: I know they're in the film and aren't friendly. I just think it's odd you seem to assume they're the/a baddie team (and mention them specifically) when the only known baddie role has no affiliation with them.

There are 25 players in this game; the parity has to exist somewhere.

And no I'm not assuming that anyone who has BTSC is bad, I'm putting the idea up for discussion.

It just felt strange to me that of all the possibilities you came up with one specific one for a group of people. Nobody else seems to have picked up on it so maybe I'm just crazy but it's something I felt funny about so I brought it up.

It's not just you. It pinged me, as well. Especially with her (his?) answers since you brought it up.

LoRab wrote:Oy. I was set to catch up and vote this afternoon, and started to do the first of those, and then someone came into my office, and then by the time I was looking at a computer again it was too late. RIP MR. As I said earlier, I didn't see reason for suspicion of him. Having now read through the last day of the thread--nice bandwagon. I need to look back and see some of its starts and where the seeds were planted. I would have voted Made, or maybe MM. My feelings of neither of them has changed.

Made wrote:

Long Con wrote:Even if it were as you described, I don't see me basing my team's voting plan on Llama's Opinion. I hear you're a smart guy, Llama, but I don't know that I would place that much faith in your opinion.

Don't play this game unless you REALLY know what your doing or REALLY don't.

It's gotta be either genuine stupidity or calculated stupidity to work. Trust me I'm stupid.

Neither, I don't think. I don't think he's appearing stupid, first of all. And he certainly isn't stupid. I think he's just being him. He knows what he's doing--he's smart as fuck and is one of the very few players who have been at this longer than I have who are still playing. I don't see why you think he's trying to appear stupid, though. I guess I don't get what you're saying.

Made wrote:

S~V~S wrote:LC is far from stupid, Made.

Dana, any opinion on Bullz? Bea? Anyone?

Didn't mean to imply they were.
I'm just saying it's hard to argue for those accusing you with out either being blissfully ignorant or have the situation awareness to you how far you can go to avoid suspicion, then the lack of common sense to go above and beyond that.

Made wrote:Yo, SVS, is there a term for voting in hopes of getting others to vote someone? Because I've noticed that happens a lot.

Woah-linki kinda related? Basically mafia vote getting tactics.

Double related linki

It's called starting a bandwagon.

Keterman wrote:Remember fellow townies, it's not too late to change your vote, nor is it too late to place your vote on a scum-aligned player.

And, why should we believe you? And oh, wait, you were wrong. Also, if you could explain your reasons for your opinions, it would be helpful for me.

Metalmarsh89 wrote: As for Epi, here you will find his death. He was the rabbit who killed several of Arthur's knights in the film. While we don't yet know how bad he is, we at least know he's an indy, and I'd be willing to bet that we need him dead to win. We'll find out soon I think, either way.

What do you mean by this?

What will we find out soon enough and how? And how do you know this?

LoRab wrote:Right, but that doesn't answer my question. I'm familiar with the source material, I get the gist of your feelings about him. What I don't understand is when you say, "While we don't yet know how bad he is, we at least know he's an indy, and I'd be willing to bet that we need him dead to win. We'll find out soon I think, either way."

How will we soon find out that we need him dead to win and/or how bad he is (was)?

linkitis: @God: Awwwww. Thanks. You're a kind and compassionate God, clearly.

And I agree the Rabbit was bad news.

LoRab wrote:

Metalmarsh89 wrote:

LoRab wrote:Right, but that doesn't answer my question. I'm familiar with the source material, I get the gist of your feelings about him. What I don't understand is when you say, "While we don't yet know how bad he is, we at least know he's an indy, and I'd be willing to bet that we need him dead to win. We'll find out soon I think, either way."

How will we soon find out that we need him dead to win and/or how bad he is (was)?

linkitis: @God: Awwwww. Thanks. You're a kind and compassionate God, clearly.

And I agree the Rabbit was bad news.

Indies are wild cards, their win conditions sometimes align with civvies and sometimes don't. That's what I'm getting at. I thought we might find out, and fortunately God has told us.

Uh....God has shared God's opinion. God does not necessarily have any more knowledge than the rest of us.

And I do understand how indy roles work. I still don't see how you think/thought we'd soon know how bad the rabbit is and/or if we needed him dead or not.

Metalmarsh89 wrote:LoRab.

Okay you did make one post about a ping, but since the context wasn't there, I did not notice it as I reread.

The rest of your posts are questions/disagreements/interactions. Those are different. Those are not suspicions.

And about my vote for you, it's a strategy I've used and seen before, though not so much on this site. Placing a vote on someone is an easy way to get there attention when you want it, and that was all I wanted at the time.

LoRab wrote:Dammit. I hate being wrong.

Bullzeye wrote:

LoRab wrote:Dammit. I hate being wrong.

Me too. I don't understand why he changed his vote to JC at the last minute though. At first I thought he had a lynch switch or something but since he clearly didn't I'm not sure what his aim was there other than to make himself less saveable.

Boogs wrote:

Bullzeye wrote:

LoRab wrote:Dammit. I hate being wrong.

Me too. I don't understand why he changed his vote to JC at the last minute though. At first I thought he had a lynch switch or something but since he clearly didn't I'm not sure what his aim was there other than to make himself less saveable.

^

I have no idea what this is supposed to mean

Only being able to post at night means I have to catch up. See you soon, living

Boogs wrote:

Bullzeye wrote:

LoRab wrote:Dammit. I hate being wrong.

Me too. I don't understand why he changed his vote to JC at the last minute though. At first I thought he had a lynch switch or something but since he clearly didn't I'm not sure what his aim was there other than to make himself less saveable.

^

LoRab wrote:Dammit. I hate being wrong.

Boogs wrote:/
/
\_/ =

Keterman wrote:I have a gut scum read on juliets and since no one else is looking bad at the moment, my vote's going to her. It could change later in the day though, LoRab isn't looking great either. Mongoose is town methinks, and I don't understand the wagon on her.

juliets wrote:

Keterman wrote:I have a gut scum read on juliets and since no one else is looking bad at the moment, my vote's going to her. It could change later in the day though, LoRab isn't looking great either. Mongoose is town methinks, and I don't understand the wagon on her.

You don't know me very well and you will find out that your gut where I am concerned is wrong.

Keterman wrote:

juliets wrote:

Keterman wrote:I have a gut scum read on juliets and since no one else is looking bad at the moment, my vote's going to her. It could change later in the day though, LoRab isn't looking great either. Mongoose is town methinks, and I don't understand the wagon on her.

You don't know me very well and you will find out that your gut where I am concerned is wrong.

Stronger read now, if you were town you would've questioned why that post seemed like a day post when it is night. Instead you are just concerned with my read.

Keterman wrote:hehehehehehehehehheheheheheh

Keterman wrote:I have a gut scum read on juliets and since no one else is looking bad at the moment, my vote's going to her. It could change later in the day though, LoRab isn't looking great either. Mongoose is town methinks, and I don't understand the wagon on her.

fingersplints wrote:RIP MM. I felt like some of the votes there were a bit suspicious, and seemed like it was out of nowhere to save Mongoose. Lorab was talking about him for a while, so I think hers could be genuinely misguided.

GOD wrote:What the holy fuck???

fingersplints wrote:EBWOP: I'd add Boogs to list.

juliets wrote:

fingersplints wrote:EBWOP: I'd add Boogs to list.

I still have him in the bottom of my middle group if that makes sense.

fingersplints wrote:

juliets wrote:

fingersplints wrote:EBWOP: I'd add Boogs to list.

I still have him in the bottom of my middle group if that makes sense.

I get you. I just feel like he is falling under the radar with a convenient posting restriction.

LoRab wrote:Is Blooper another name for you, nijuukyugou?

Herbert wrote:

juliets wrote:Should i know who Herbert is?

And RIP Keterman, nice to play with you.

Boogs wrote:Rip Keterman and MM Okay, guys pleae vote. Bullzeye out! I don't know who his teammates are but he's scum. My kitty senses were going haywire and he was off the poll the last lynch! If you don't want to lynch him, then please figure out who his teammates are and get them.