Re: Battlestar Galactica Mafia - Day Three
Posted: Sat May 14, 2016 9:43 am
Yeah, I missed that part.Epignosis wrote: I would never hire you as my lawyer.

Murder, Mayhem, and Mafia
https://www.mafiathesyndicate.com/
Yeah, I missed that part.Epignosis wrote: I would never hire you as my lawyer.
So, you won't tell me where you are on the grid? You don't want to info dump that info?Ricochet wrote:I did answer back then. Answering you wouldbe infodumping, so I can't answer you. Relevance, your conship?Long Con wrote:Cool man! I'll wait for an answer from you about the question of where you are on the map when you get a chance, and there is no rush at all on that. Maybe bea will be interested in your answer as well.Ricochet wrote:So say we all.
RIP Indi you shining diamond. You will be avenged.
Anyhow, I'll be blunt. Today is the contest I'm accompanying at and tomorrow is journey back home. I plan, as much as I possibly can, to go back and study the lynch votes timing and people's ISO on nutella. I cannot vouch to do more or stay in real-time mode forever.
I may very well have no information on that matter myself.Long Con wrote:So, you won't tell me where you are on the grid? You don't want to info dump that info?Ricochet wrote:I did answer back then. Answering you wouldbe infodumping, so I can't answer you. Relevance, your conship?Long Con wrote:Cool man! I'll wait for an answer from you about the question of where you are on the map when you get a chance, and there is no rush at all on that. Maybe bea will be interested in your answer as well.Ricochet wrote:So say we all.
RIP Indi you shining diamond. You will be avenged.
Anyhow, I'll be blunt. Today is the contest I'm accompanying at and tomorrow is journey back home. I plan, as much as I possibly can, to go back and study the lynch votes timing and people's ISO on nutella. I cannot vouch to do more or stay in real-time mode forever.
Amusing is more like it.Golden wrote:A two-goal lead...
Good multi-tasking, G-Man![]()
Right back at you, Snarmot. Now stop giving off baddie vibes!Metalmarsh89 wrote:Nice job G-Man on the Sortie!
indiglo wrote: >May 8, 11:47 pm EST - ika, A1
>May 9, 5:47 5:49 am EST - ika, A3
>May 9, 11:49 am EST - indiglo, A5 LC, D5
>May 9, 5:49 pm EST - Silverwolf, A5
>May 9, 11:49 pm EST - Marmot, E3
>May 10, 5:49 am EST - SVS, B2 - SUCCESS
>May 10, 11:49 am EST - juliets, C3
>May 10, 5:49 pm EST - SW, F4
>May 10, 11:49 pm EST - indiglo, F5
>May 11, 5:49 am EST - Rico, E5
>May 11, 11:49 am EST - G-Man, E1
>May 11, 5:49 pm EST - juliets, B3
>May 11, 11:49 pm 12:12am EST - Scotty, D6
---Switching to 12 hour intervals---
>May 12 - 12:12 am EST - Scotty - D6
>May 12 - 12:12 12:34 pm EST - Bea indiglo - B6
>May 13 - 12:12 12:34 am EST - Marmot - F2 - SUCCESS
>May 13 - 12:12 12:34 pm EST - G-Man - A6 -SUCCESS
May 14 - 12:04 am EST - Scotty - C5
May 14 - 6:04 am EST - ??
May 14 - 12:04 pm EST -
May 14 - 6:04 pm EST -
(the times in italics are still tentative, and will depend upon exactly when Goldama posts the End of Night post.)
A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 A6
B1 B2 B3 B4 B5 B6
C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 C6
D1 D2 D3 D4 D5 D6
E1 E2 E3 E4 E5 E6
F1 F2 F3 F4 F5 F6
Scotty sent one in at 12:04 am, and Golden accepted it. That was 11.5 hours after the previous, so we must be back on normal time.G-Man wrote:Aww crap, I failed to note Indiglo's note at the bottom. Golden posted the night post at 11:35 p.m. Can anyone figure out the time dilation impact on our sortie scheduling? I'll give it a whirl after lunch here.
All I see is Golden the CowardMetalmarsh89 wrote:Scotty sent one in at 12:04 am, and Golden accepted it. That was 11.5 hours after the previous, so we must be back on normal time.G-Man wrote:Aww crap, I failed to note Indiglo's note at the bottom. Golden posted the night post at 11:35 p.m. Can anyone figure out the time dilation impact on our sortie scheduling? I'll give it a whirl after lunch here.
But he doesn't say outright that we're back on the normal schedule nor does he say that Scotty's sortie was accepted.. Does our sortie schedule run every six hours from the night post or every six hours as a set time like it had been before? If we're back to the previous time schedule, then we missed another one. The original schedule had us going 5:49 and 11:49.Golden wrote:On that note - I have a sermon to finish writing today and preach tomorrow, so don't expect me to be around much until after then. Have fun until then everyone. And someone answer Scotty's question, or direct him to read my posts thoroughly, would you? Cheers!![]()
Do you think Long Con is a civilian or mafia?S~V~S wrote:I do not plan on voting for you today, though, slip or no slip, because I think you were trying to get lynched last day. I think you will gain some benefit from it, maybe a permanent rezz, or something like that. Maybe your "all cylons must die" thing when that obviously is not true is part of that. But you have some sort of game going on here (a con, if you will) and I for one really don't want to give it to you.
As mentioned earlier, we don't know that his sortie was accepted. If we get results for it, then we'll know and we can schedule future sorties based on that. Hopefully we get confirmation well before the next one is due.juliets wrote:If Scotty's sortie was accepted at :04 should the rest of our sorties be at :04? :00 would be 4 minutes too early would it not?
We've steered clear of the black hole, so we should be back on 6 hour intervals, right?juliets wrote:If Scotty's sortie was accepted at :04 should the rest of our sorties be at :04? :00 would be 4 minutes too early would it not?
Oh I see - nobody submitted the 6:00 ish am sortie. That's why I was confused - somehow I thought that got submitted. Thanks MM.Metalmarsh89 wrote:We've steered clear of the black hole, so we should be back on 6 hour intervals, right?juliets wrote:If Scotty's sortie was accepted at :04 should the rest of our sorties be at :04? :00 would be 4 minutes too early would it not?
Scotty submitted his at 12:04 am. I submitted mine ta 12:00 pm, which is way beyond the 6 hour interval, so should be accepted I think.
Forget why you made the post in the first place and if that made sense or not (I think I get what you say you were saying, but it still is a bit off to me)--this reaction doesn't make sense from a civ perspective. "Where have I slipped?" implies that you have something to slip about. Not, you misunderstood my posts, or no that wasn't a slip I'm civ.bea wrote: I'm super confused as to what you think I have slipped about? ]
Iso me. I've been talking about the idea of civ aligned cylons for like ever. YOU were the one I was responding to where. I first said "I'd have a rough time seeing athena as anything but civ aligned." Please go back and look.
I don't think I'm miss remembering in saying that happened before epi flipped athena. Where have I slipped? I think I've been pretty constant on my stance about the cylons.
When you make posts like this it make you sound more bad, making implications based on someone's basic personality traits which are unrelated to affiliation. When I talk about you making feints at people, this is what I mean. Little implications that you can sow & pick up later if they bear fruit.LoRab wrote:Also, you seem to be saying "we humans" and "us humans" a whole lot, as a baddie might do in order to avoid question that they are human. Baddies tend to be careful about that, civs not so much.
Where did you talk about my making feints at people? I must have missed that post? And no, I'm not trying to start a band wagon. I'm stating my suspicion of a player.Long Con wrote:When you make posts like this it make you sound more bad, making implications based on someone's basic personality traits which are unrelated to affiliation. When I talk about you making feints at people, this is what I mean. Little implications that you can sow & pick up later if they bear fruit.LoRab wrote:Also, you seem to be saying "we humans" and "us humans" a whole lot, as a baddie might do in order to avoid question that they are human. Baddies tend to be careful about that, civs not so much.
Sorry, Lorab, it was a little jab/feint at S~V~S for this post:LoRab wrote:Where did you talk about my making feints at people? I must have missed that post? And no, I'm not trying to start a band wagon. I'm stating my suspicion of a player.Long Con wrote:When you make posts like this it make you sound more bad, making implications based on someone's basic personality traits which are unrelated to affiliation. When I talk about you making feints at people, this is what I mean. Little implications that you can sow & pick up later if they bear fruit.LoRab wrote:Also, you seem to be saying "we humans" and "us humans" a whole lot, as a baddie might do in order to avoid question that they are human. Baddies tend to be careful about that, civs not so much.
I often find suspicions based on patters of speech (well, typing) that are off to me--based on that players usual posting or based on general patterns of language. It is not indicative of alignment.
And in this particular game, I am not bad.
nutella wrote:sig, people familiar with the show have insisted that Athena is a good character, are you ignoring that info? like I get that maybe we shouldn't assume that it's reflected in the roles in this game, but it would make some sense. are you not willing to entertain that possibility?
lorab I am so jealous!!!!!
Mine will be easy.JaggedJimmyJay wrote:So say we all, just in case.
I must have lost track of the phases, I thought the night phase ended tonight rather than last night.
I still need to investigate nutella interactions in the reverse direction. I'll start working on that now, but it'll probably be a while before I can finish. I have stuff going on, man.
A baddie Nutella would want the civ cred, she knows the lore, she knows it will be perceived as questionable to say otherwise. Plus a baddie team has a NK, if they want Athena dead, I'm sure they have a more efficient way than lynching her. I don't think it says anything about Epi's alignment personally.sig wrote:but, in all seriousness I did some independent lore research and looked everything over and I'm willing to consider some cylons don't need to be lycnhed. However, nutella made this post.
nutella wrote:sig, people familiar with the show have insisted that Athena is a good character, are you ignoring that info? like I get that maybe we shouldn't assume that it's reflected in the roles in this game, but it would make some sense. are you not willing to entertain that possibility?
lorab I am so jealous!!!!!
So does that mean she was trying to cover for Athena and they're teammates. What does everyone think of this?
sig wrote:but, in all seriousness I did some independent lore research and looked everything over and I'm willing to consider some cylons don't need to be lycnhed. However, nutella made this post.
nutella wrote:sig, people familiar with the show have insisted that Athena is a good character, are you ignoring that info? like I get that maybe we shouldn't assume that it's reflected in the roles in this game, but it would make some sense. are you not willing to entertain that possibility?
lorab I am so jealous!!!!!
So does that mean she was trying to cover for Athena and they're teammates. What does everyone think of this?
yes. I double checked.Spacedaisy wrote:Didn't the flip say Epi was Athena?
Does your History have a "Recently closed tabs" thingy? My Chrome keeps a partially written post for me even if I X.JaggedJimmyJay wrote:I just lost an hour's worth of Mafia work by accidentally hitting the "X" when I tried to click over to my work tab. Typically I copy/paste into notepad as I work to prevent this, but. Well. Not this time.
I'll come back later.
I'm not sure. Where is that on the Chrome interface for you?Long Con wrote:Does your History have a "Recently closed tabs" thingy? My Chrome keeps a partially written post for me even if I X.JaggedJimmyJay wrote:I just lost an hour's worth of Mafia work by accidentally hitting the "X" when I tried to click over to my work tab. Typically I copy/paste into notepad as I work to prevent this, but. Well. Not this time.
I'll come back later.