Re: Game of Champions 2020 [Day 1]
Posted: Thu Feb 11, 2021 1:24 pm
no!!! I said "yolo" when I should have said "real life psychic powers" or something. I made another substandard joke and I can't keep getting away with it.
Murder, Mayhem, and Mafia
https://www.mafiathesyndicate.com/
no!!! I said "yolo" when I should have said "real life psychic powers" or something. I made another substandard joke and I can't keep getting away with it.
Master Radishes wrote: ↑Thu Feb 11, 2021 8:13 amNot read them tbh. I was asleep when he was in the thread. I picked up he decided to scumread me for misreading Michelle's post about him. I kind of understood his point about why it came across as scummy though. Like he painted my reply to Michelle as one coming from a scum perspective and I can see how he got there.
So in not so many words: completely null, though nothing that pings me in what he has posted.
Master Radishes wrote: ↑Thu Feb 11, 2021 8:13 amI never know what I'm talking about.NANOOKTHEGREATANDFEARSOME wrote: ↑Thu Feb 11, 2021 7:18 amI’m sheeping radishes read, he sounded like he knew what he was talking aboutMacDougall wrote: ↑Thu Feb 11, 2021 7:02 am @NANOOKTHEGREATANDFEARSOME @Master Radishes what's the 112 vote about?
Like. More of this. It's so glaring to me that radish feels the need to post this many words. Im confident that if he was town he would mega slank the first couple days of a huge game like this until he could do some mech solving or read just the cdc people. But instead he's super engaged and overdefensive/overexplainy of everything. How is that not scum radish to a tMaster Radishes wrote: ↑Thu Feb 11, 2021 8:19 am ^that was a joke comment but also I do struggle to read 112 sometimes despite our experience together. I've just seen her play at so many different levels that I never know for sure which one she's at and so don't know how to establish a baseline on reading her. Like this game so far might just be standard lazy 112 shooting from the hip with no direction and I'm misreading her based on a different expectation I hold. Or it might be scum 112 mimicking that style and just not concentrating enough to really nail it and I'm picking up on that.
My experiences with you in video mafia tells me that you also have a bit of a devilish/unpredictable streak in you too, in addition to playing logically.
Thunal33 wrote: ↑Thu Feb 11, 2021 10:10 amI'm saying in logical terms: If someone's reads are fake then they're probably mafia, but it's not necessarily the case that if someone's mafia then their reads are fake.Dyslexicon wrote: ↑Thu Feb 11, 2021 12:50 amI mean, it was probably 10 % serious. Her post made little sense to me. She usually makes sense. Also: "I think if someone fakes a read that person is likely mafia, but faking reads is less common than in other mafia games." Is there context missing, or does the last part of this sentence make no sense?
Won't read her now though. Cause I've played too much mafia today already. I might get more into the game as it goes and such. I'm sorry, but I just don't have the capacity for it.
.....heh.Thunal33 wrote: ↑Thu Feb 11, 2021 10:14 amHonestly I thought that was just a reaction test for Mac or a joke.Sloonei wrote: ↑Thu Feb 11, 2021 2:43 am [VOTE: thunal] aubergine for something quite silly that happened early in the game and I forgot about til just now:
I decided to call Mac mafia for absolutely no reason. Pure "reaction testing" as we call it. Thunal was the only one to pick up on it, asking me why I felt that way. My response was deliberately goofy, meant again to elicit some sort of reaction. Except... Thunal didn't react at all. Thunal was still active in the thread at the time. It is possible she missed this post, but I made it provocative on purpose and got no response. That is not exactly cromulent in my book. I can read it as a player who recognizes a reaction test and retreats from it. Or she just didn't see it.
garbage yes, fake i don't think sonutella wrote: ↑Thu Feb 11, 2021 1:24 pmI agree and furthermore what did you think of radish immediately pairing 112 and nook there because I thought that was garbage and also fake.MacDougall wrote: ↑Thu Feb 11, 2021 7:16 amIt's probably ok for him. I would give him a pass for that and put that paranoia into a paranoia jar to be opened at a later moment with the other paranoia lollies.Master Radishes wrote: ↑Thu Feb 11, 2021 7:15 am @MacDougall
He had just popped into thread and my case on 112 was the most recent one.
It felt he was mimicking his usual /shrug/ style.
MrrrrrrThunal33 wrote: ↑Thu Feb 11, 2021 10:41 am#2803Master Radishes wrote: ↑Thu Feb 11, 2021 10:36 amHaven't read them. Haven't read anything that wasn't posted whilst I was present in the thread.Thunal33 wrote: ↑Thu Feb 11, 2021 10:19 amWhat do you think about my posts on Falcon?Master Radishes wrote: ↑Thu Feb 11, 2021 3:41 am Speaking of CDCers, what's falcon done lately?
I haven't forgiven him for his terrible read on me in D0 and I feel like he's kept a low profile.
I didn't like Falcon's early nudge on me, but he's been fine enough since. Why, what do you have?
I'm feeling a bit less confident on Falcon wolf than I did then because nobody agrees with my read but I still feel like he's playing differently than the one time I've seen him in a wolfy way.
Im disliking thunal posts more and more, don't feel nearly as strongly as I do about radish but would be cool with a wagon there
kind of like tutuu, don't like thunal
read thunal's posts then vote her with meTimsup2nothin wrote: ↑Thu Feb 11, 2021 1:39 pm Morning everyone. Looks like things have changed a bit around here. Nutella, 112, with an outside shot at Radishes? Is that where we're at?
Or is that Radish wagon just the residual?
hmm, pointless queriesTimsup2nothin wrote: ↑Thu Feb 11, 2021 1:39 pm Morning everyone. Looks like things have changed a bit around here. Nutella, 112, with an outside shot at Radishes? Is that where we're at?
Or is that Radish wagon just the residual?
yeah hey i can agree with you on something at leastMaster Radishes wrote: ↑Thu Feb 11, 2021 10:57 amI mean this as a compliment to them:
There is no way anyone can discern dya's alignment from a handful of early posts.
For this application do I count as "from Syndicate" or as someone from...wherever I am from nowadays am I still allowed to bitch about new posts?
activity levelsTimsup2nothin wrote: ↑Thu Feb 11, 2021 1:43 pmFor this application do I count as "from Syndicate" or as someone from...wherever I am from nowadays am I still allowed to bitch about new posts?
PS, what's "new posts"?
but but but i just managed to do itnutella wrote: ↑Thu Feb 11, 2021 1:41 pmyeah hey i can agree with you on something at leastMaster Radishes wrote: ↑Thu Feb 11, 2021 10:57 amI mean this as a compliment to them:
There is no way anyone can discern dya's alignment from a handful of early posts.![]()
LOL...I have been playing the same "hell no I am not reading this" game since say ) and NOW you wanna shade me for pointless queries? Now?112 wrote: ↑Thu Feb 11, 2021 1:41 pmhmm, pointless queriesTimsup2nothin wrote: ↑Thu Feb 11, 2021 1:39 pm Morning everyone. Looks like things have changed a bit around here. Nutella, 112, with an outside shot at Radishes? Is that where we're at?
Or is that Radish wagon just the residual?
Why the low posters? Which one would you go for?tutuu wrote: ↑Thu Feb 11, 2021 11:10 am 112 wagon picked up, i was considering voting her ealier purely cuz i thought she might be solving mafia. she is definitely solving and shes definitely pro-town and shes definitely scumhunting imo, and despite she might be mafia. but i cant bring myself to vote her. i think she deserves to live more than a low poster. syndicate big games notorious for low amount of KP. sloonii also said previous GoC game had low amount of KP and lasted 9 days. if day yeet is the potentially only source of town KP then might as well start killing low posters or something? i dunno
I wasn't actually thinking about reaction tests when I wrote that, I was thinking of fake reads that aren't rescinded or revealed as fake.nutella wrote: ↑Thu Feb 11, 2021 1:32 pmThunal33 wrote: ↑Thu Feb 11, 2021 10:10 amI'm saying in logical terms: If someone's reads are fake then they're probably mafia, but it's not necessarily the case that if someone's mafia then their reads are fake.Dyslexicon wrote: ↑Thu Feb 11, 2021 12:50 amI mean, it was probably 10 % serious. Her post made little sense to me. She usually makes sense. Also: "I think if someone fakes a read that person is likely mafia, but faking reads is less common than in other mafia games." Is there context missing, or does the last part of this sentence make no sense?
Won't read her now though. Cause I've played too much mafia today already. I might get more into the game as it goes and such. I'm sorry, but I just don't have the capacity for it......heh.Thunal33 wrote: ↑Thu Feb 11, 2021 10:14 amHonestly I thought that was just a reaction test for Mac or a joke.Sloonei wrote: ↑Thu Feb 11, 2021 2:43 am [VOTE: thunal] aubergine for something quite silly that happened early in the game and I forgot about til just now:
I decided to call Mac mafia for absolutely no reason. Pure "reaction testing" as we call it. Thunal was the only one to pick up on it, asking me why I felt that way. My response was deliberately goofy, meant again to elicit some sort of reaction. Except... Thunal didn't react at all. Thunal was still active in the thread at the time. It is possible she missed this post, but I made it provocative on purpose and got no response. That is not exactly cromulent in my book. I can read it as a player who recognizes a reaction test and retreats from it. Or she just didn't see it.
I see what you mean when you put it this way, but don't share your confidence, think it's fairly nai for kyle but I would like more contenttutuu wrote: ↑Thu Feb 11, 2021 12:47 pm I think that Kyle is Mafia; the way he's constantly talking about having to catch up is a way I've seen Mafia do, can't really argument it; it's just how I've seen it; I think there are other people who groan at having to catch up but they aren't following it so faithfully / they meme from time to time / they still give reads from time to time.
I think the way Kyle is approaching this is wolfy and he's constantly reminding us that he's trying to read every post (which I believe him that he is) but that's busywork IMO and he's mafia.
I care more in forum mafia lol, I want to play well and early d1 suspicion is honestly draining to deal with.
Oh...yeah I thankfully chose this game to adopt a "yeah, I'll read your posts when you are dead if I am not" approach to the early game. It seems to be working out.dyachei wrote: ↑Thu Feb 11, 2021 1:44 pmactivity levelsTimsup2nothin wrote: ↑Thu Feb 11, 2021 1:43 pmFor this application do I count as "from Syndicate" or as someone from...wherever I am from nowadays am I still allowed to bitch about new posts?
PS, what's "new posts"?
i woke up to like 500 new posts
Why are you disliking my posts?
lmao
i think it's an objective thing but yes meta a bit, tooTimsup2nothin wrote: ↑Thu Feb 11, 2021 1:50 pmOh...yeah I thankfully chose this game to adopt a "yeah, I'll read your posts when you are dead if I am not" approach to the early game. It seems to be working out.dyachei wrote: ↑Thu Feb 11, 2021 1:44 pmactivity levelsTimsup2nothin wrote: ↑Thu Feb 11, 2021 1:43 pmFor this application do I count as "from Syndicate" or as someone from...wherever I am from nowadays am I still allowed to bitch about new posts?
PS, what's "new posts"?
i woke up to like 500 new posts
You didn't tell me that I am not allowed to bitch though, so I probably will...but just to be annoying...I won't really mean anything by it.
So, Thunal? I have never ever played with Thunal, so if I read her posts will it make sense to me objectively that she is wolfing? Or is this a meta based thing where I can just sheep you without reading and be just as clued in.
Why didn't you scumread me on my tone earlier? I'm leaning towards you being town confbiasing but you said I didn't have a solving spark which motivated me to solve, and now you have another reason to scumread me that I think you would have noticed earlier.dyachei wrote: ↑Thu Feb 11, 2021 1:44 pmactivity levelsTimsup2nothin wrote: ↑Thu Feb 11, 2021 1:43 pmFor this application do I count as "from Syndicate" or as someone from...wherever I am from nowadays am I still allowed to bitch about new posts?
PS, what's "new posts"?
i woke up to like 500 new posts
sounds good I agree with most of thisdyachei wrote: ↑Thu Feb 11, 2021 1:40 pmkind of like tutuu, don't like thunal
not sure what to make of made tbh, i want to come to an alignment but i dont get what he's doing in thread
have some concerns about mac
believe alison
am like 30 pages behind still
who said i wasn't also factoring that in earlier?Thunal33 wrote: ↑Thu Feb 11, 2021 1:53 pmWhy didn't you scumread me on my tone earlier? I'm leaning towards you being town confbiasing but you said I didn't have a solving spark which motivated me to solve, and now you have another reason to scumread me that I think you would have noticed earlier.dyachei wrote: ↑Thu Feb 11, 2021 1:44 pmactivity levelsTimsup2nothin wrote: ↑Thu Feb 11, 2021 1:43 pmFor this application do I count as "from Syndicate" or as someone from...wherever I am from nowadays am I still allowed to bitch about new posts?
PS, what's "new posts"?
i woke up to like 500 new posts
Why didn't you respond at all?Thunal33 wrote: ↑Thu Feb 11, 2021 10:14 amHonestly I thought that was just a reaction test for Mac or a joke.Sloonei wrote: ↑Thu Feb 11, 2021 2:43 am [VOTE: thunal] aubergine for something quite silly that happened early in the game and I forgot about til just now:
I decided to call Mac mafia for absolutely no reason. Pure "reaction testing" as we call it. Thunal was the only one to pick up on it, asking me why I felt that way. My response was deliberately goofy, meant again to elicit some sort of reaction. Except... Thunal didn't react at all. Thunal was still active in the thread at the time. It is possible she missed this post, but I made it provocative on purpose and got no response. That is not exactly cromulent in my book. I can read it as a player who recognizes a reaction test and retreats from it. Or she just didn't see it.
this seems like a nitpicky discredit? is it not reasonable that dya continued to take issue with your posting styleThunal33 wrote: ↑Thu Feb 11, 2021 1:53 pmWhy didn't you scumread me on my tone earlier? I'm leaning towards you being town confbiasing but you said I didn't have a solving spark which motivated me to solve, and now you have another reason to scumread me that I think you would have noticed earlier.dyachei wrote: ↑Thu Feb 11, 2021 1:44 pmactivity levelsTimsup2nothin wrote: ↑Thu Feb 11, 2021 1:43 pmFor this application do I count as "from Syndicate" or as someone from...wherever I am from nowadays am I still allowed to bitch about new posts?
PS, what's "new posts"?
i woke up to like 500 new posts