The Syndicate

Corrupted Jury

Shoot Jack, IMO.

Jackofhearts2005 wrote:

Golden wrote:

Jackofhearts2005 wrote:

Golden wrote:

Quin wrote:

Golden wrote:

Quin wrote:Something to throw out there is that Nacho might not have been the intended kill given marmots role flip.

I recall Golden mentioning his actual Night 1 target wasn't who he had initially targeted. Was that person Nacho?

No. I targeted Jay and ended up targeting Fredwood.

Would you agree with me if I said that this indicates that they're very likely not both bad? I don't see a reason marmot would target two of his teammates. One, maybe.

Full confession, I only just went back and read marmot's role now to be able to answer this (I was sneaking in a moment just to see how he flipped yesterday while with the wife's family). So I haven't dwelt on it, but that makes sense to me. Assuming that it was marmot that redirected me.

@Golden

Revisionist nothing. You left out your full results and encouraged the idea that Marmot was behind the targeting switch.

Now, maybe that was just a mistake. I have a lot of experience with the role. It's in most of our games. Maybe you don't.

But like I said, if you want me to believe you made a mistake, you need to be upfront with your other results, not beat around the bush like you're afraid someone's gonna bust your claim.

I'm sorry. This is a blatant lie. Prove what you are saying. I did not encourage or anything marmot. I did the opposite.

It's literally in the post I quoted. Just look up.

You say that JJJ and Fred not being the same alignment makes sense. You don't give your actual results in that post or your next several posts.

Oh, I'm sorry, saying something 'makes sense' is 'encouraging the idea' is it? What about what I did after that point?

Basically what you are saying is 'because golden didn't catch on to the fact that he would have seen marmot if that was the correct answer before I did, he must be bad/lying'.

Well, sorry for not being as good as you at the game. I've never done this role before. That also made sense when you said it. Saying something makes sense isn't the same as giving the final word or 'encouraging people' to see it that way.

If you read the full part of the thread in progression it will be incredibly clear that what I was doing was trying to make sense of the situation. I don't know or care when I said exactly what happened, because what I said happened is the truth. By the way, you seem to have forgotten that I got false results from sprit accidentally, so I think at the time I even said 'that makes sense' I may not have known the truth of who I targetted. I can't remember the timing. What I can remember is that I never encouraged a particular interpretation of what happened. I just wanted to figure out what happened.

JaggedJimmyJay wrote:The item voted on Night 2 is a corrupted jury.

Have we gotten to know what it does yet?

JaggedJimmyJay wrote:The item voted on Night 2 is a corrupted jury.

That is not the name of the thing I got, and doesn't even seem like a very likely pseudonym for the same thing. It doesn't really relate at all.

I missed voting for someone on it because I didn't think to set that vote up in advance.

Soneji wrote:

JaggedJimmyJay wrote:The item voted on Night 2 is a corrupted jury.

Have we gotten to know what it does yet?

At a guess, we won't. I bet nutella had it.

JaggedJimmyJay wrote:Shoot Jack, IMO.

Jack, Long Con, and Soneji are my final 3.

JaggedJimmyJay wrote:

JaggedJimmyJay wrote:Golden, have any of your earlier reads changed significantly in the present?

You mean from my overnight rainbow? Jack has gone down based on this argument I'm having, but he was already on a downward slide after the quin stuff.

I have to admit I'm not up to play on all the claims and counterclaims. Some of that might effect my reads if I understood it all.

JaggedJimmyJay wrote:Shoot Jack, IMO.

I'm with this guy.

Golden wrote:

JaggedJimmyJay wrote:The item voted on Night 2 is a corrupted jury.

That is not the name of the thing I got, and doesn't even seem like a very likely pseudonym for the same thing. It doesn't really relate at all.

I missed voting for someone on it because I didn't think to set that vote up in advance.

Golden does not believe the item he received was the result of the Night 2 voting. This would suggest he received something from an inventor, or is making it all up.
Long Con is claiming to have gifted me a gun on Night 2. This suggests he is an inventor, but not the one who gifted an item to Golden.

We have no public evidence of any other items being delivered at any other point in the game, except by the travel mechanic.

Dyslexicon wrote:

JaggedJimmyJay wrote:Shoot Jack, IMO.

I'm with this guy.

Why should I not shoot Long Con?

Well it's odd, because I specifically asked LC if he had given any items at any other times, and he said no. But then he specifically asked if anyone else got an item night 2, which I did.

Golden wrote:Well it's odd, because I specifically asked LC if he had given any items at any other times, and he said no. But then he specifically asked if anyone else got an item night 2, which I did.

Gimme a GTH read on LC.

Jackofhearts2005 wrote:

Golden wrote:

Jackofhearts2005 wrote:

Golden wrote:

Quin wrote:

Golden wrote:

Quin wrote:Something to throw out there is that Nacho might not have been the intended kill given marmots role flip.

I recall Golden mentioning his actual Night 1 target wasn't who he had initially targeted. Was that person Nacho?

No. I targeted Jay and ended up targeting Fredwood.

Would you agree with me if I said that this indicates that they're very likely not both bad? I don't see a reason marmot would target two of his teammates. One, maybe.

Full confession, I only just went back and read marmot's role now to be able to answer this (I was sneaking in a moment just to see how he flipped yesterday while with the wife's family). So I haven't dwelt on it, but that makes sense to me. Assuming that it was marmot that redirected me.

@Golden

Revisionist nothing. You left out your full results and encouraged the idea that Marmot was behind the targeting switch.

Now, maybe that was just a mistake. I have a lot of experience with the role. It's in most of our games. Maybe you don't.

But like I said, if you want me to believe you made a mistake, you need to be upfront with your other results, not beat around the bush like you're afraid someone's gonna bust your claim.

I'm sorry. This is a blatant lie. Prove what you are saying. I did not encourage or anything marmot. I did the opposite.

It's literally in the post I quoted. Just look up.

You say that JJJ and Fred not being the same alignment makes sense. You don't give your actual results in that post or your next several posts.

Oh, and not only did I say it 'makes sense', the next sentence was literally 'assuming the marmot redirected me'.

Sloonei wrote:

Golden wrote:Well it's odd, because I specifically asked LC if he had given any items at any other times, and he said no. But then he specifically asked if anyone else got an item night 2, which I did.

Gimme a GTH read on LC.

Town

Golden wrote:

Sloonei wrote:

Golden wrote:Well it's odd, because I specifically asked LC if he had given any items at any other times, and he said no. But then he specifically asked if anyone else got an item night 2, which I did.

Gimme a GTH read on LC.

Town

So you believe that he gave me this gun, and that a different role with similar abilities gave you your item, and that there is a third item floating around from the Night vote?

Long Con said he gave Sloonei a gun. Sloonei has a gun.

That's already a degree of corroboration not seen with a few other claims. It clashes with my tracking of LC on the same night, but Sloonei has a gun. If LC is mafia, one of his teammates is an inventor/gifter, not him.

Sloonei wrote:

Dyslexicon wrote:

JaggedJimmyJay wrote:Shoot Jack, IMO.

I'm with this guy.

Why should I not shoot Long Con?

I don't know. Not caught up. Just sheeping JJJ.

Also, I just remembered something on D1 that Fred said about Quin that struck a distancy chord. When I asked him for reads. Though I think Fred half defended Marmot as well in the same post, so maybe not important.

But I guess Jack is a good target imo since he has had lots of interaction and suspicion on him.

But sure, there are other good targets.

JaggedJimmyJay wrote:Long Con said he gave Sloonei a gun. Sloonei has a gun.

That's already a degree of corroboration not seen with a few other claims. It clashes with my tracking of LC on the same night, but Sloonei has a gun. If LC is mafia, one of his teammates is an inventor/gifter, not him.

I forgot about your tracking results/thought you were bluffing again.

I am skeptical of his claim to have given me a gun because it came long after I had announced my gun and while I was pointing it in his face. I don't think it's out of the question that I got this from the Night 2 vote and that "Corrupted Jury" is some sort of euphemism for a gun.

Sloonei wrote:

Golden wrote:

Sloonei wrote:

Golden wrote:Well it's odd, because I specifically asked LC if he had given any items at any other times, and he said no. But then he specifically asked if anyone else got an item night 2, which I did.

Gimme a GTH read on LC.

Town

So you believe that he gave me this gun, and that a different role with similar abilities gave you your item, and that there is a third item floating around from the Night vote?

I have:

a) no reason to disbelieve it, given the information I have at hand
b) no reason to believe its truth or untruth is at all alignment indicative of Long Con, knowing him like I do.

My gth read is based on the tone of his posts generally. I feel LC has an earnestness he can't replicate when bad. Like, he believes in his opinions and theories and it comes across. It also felt (from an external perspective) like he was well positioned on the marmot vote. His vote goes anywhere else and marmot is possibly not lynched? But that's a 'not there in the moment' view (and honestly, sorry, but I haven't had time to read back that part of the thread in any detail).

For JoH, I have seen JoH argue against suspicion on him based on the accuser not giving who they thought his potential scumbuddies were and arguing against him NKing Nacho by asking why didn't he kill JJJ instead. Defends himself on hypotheticals.

LC I haven't remembered much from. From his voting history I came across this:

Long Con wrote:

Dyslexicon wrote:

insertnamehere wrote:VOTE LYNCH DYSLEXICON

I appreciate this.

Such RAWR.
Was probably not going to stick with my vote anyway, and I think this comes off more genuine than not.
One question though: Did you go through my whole ISO, as in, did you read every post?

Lynch LC

^If I'm to stick with early meta gut similar to my Sig gut.

And you can look forward to similar results. Perhaps the Sig results pleased you?

Which is certainly sirengif worthy.

Sloonei wrote:

Golden wrote:

JaggedJimmyJay wrote:The item voted on Night 2 is a corrupted jury.

That is not the name of the thing I got, and doesn't even seem like a very likely pseudonym for the same thing. It doesn't really relate at all.

I missed voting for someone on it because I didn't think to set that vote up in advance.

Golden does not believe the item he received was the result of the Night 2 voting. This would suggest he received something from an inventor, or is making it all up.
Long Con is claiming to have gifted me a gun on Night 2. This suggests he is an inventor, but not the one who gifted an item to Golden.

We have no public evidence of any other items being delivered at any other point in the game, except by the travel mechanic.

I already said something about this. You're trying to piece something together without having all the pieces. But this setup won't be known before after the game. I suggest more behavior analysis and less night action analysis where it's incomplete.

Dyslexicon wrote:

Sloonei wrote:

Golden wrote:

JaggedJimmyJay wrote:The item voted on Night 2 is a corrupted jury.

That is not the name of the thing I got, and doesn't even seem like a very likely pseudonym for the same thing. It doesn't really relate at all.

I missed voting for someone on it because I didn't think to set that vote up in advance.

Golden does not believe the item he received was the result of the Night 2 voting. This would suggest he received something from an inventor, or is making it all up.
Long Con is claiming to have gifted me a gun on Night 2. This suggests he is an inventor, but not the one who gifted an item to Golden.

We have no public evidence of any other items being delivered at any other point in the game, except by the travel mechanic.

I already said something about this. You're trying to piece something together without having all the pieces. But this setup won't be known before after the game. I suggest more behavior analysis and less night action analysis where it's incomplete.

Agreed.

Let's get FIRED up!!!! STILL

VOTALS:

Quin (1): JoH
JoH (1): Quin
Soneji (1): JJJ


With 14 Alive, it takes 8 to Lynch and 4 to Soft Lynch. Day ends in approx. 6 hours


I don't believe the votes have changed, but here's a repost

I mean, maybe shoot LC, I'm not directly opposed to it.

@Soneji, how caught up are you?

I think I am ready to shoot. A reminder that we all have to wait in silence for sprityo to post the results before talking again.

Dyslexicon wrote:

Sloonei wrote:

Golden wrote:

JaggedJimmyJay wrote:The item voted on Night 2 is a corrupted jury.

That is not the name of the thing I got, and doesn't even seem like a very likely pseudonym for the same thing. It doesn't really relate at all.

I missed voting for someone on it because I didn't think to set that vote up in advance.

Golden does not believe the item he received was the result of the Night 2 voting. This would suggest he received something from an inventor, or is making it all up.
Long Con is claiming to have gifted me a gun on Night 2. This suggests he is an inventor, but not the one who gifted an item to Golden.

We have no public evidence of any other items being delivered at any other point in the game, except by the travel mechanic.

I already said something about this. You're trying to piece something together without having all the pieces. But this setup won't be known before after the game. I suggest more behavior analysis and less night action analysis where it's incomplete.

I completely agree with this. It's my cylon point. Trying to assign town veracity to info claims is a dangerous game.

Sloonei wrote:I think I am ready to shoot. A reminder that we all have to wait in silence for sprityo to post the results before talking again.

If you are going to shoot me, can you please say so that I can post the five map things first.

Dyslexicon wrote:I mean, maybe shoot LC, I'm not directly opposed to it.

@Soneji, how caught up are you?

Page 61/167

Some of the stuff that I'll go through I have already read at other times. JJJ being confirmed cuts down on the brain power needed to scrutinize his many posts, though I still skim them for cases he makes. I have nowhere to be for the next six hours, so mafia is all I'll be doing.

Sorry if I'm wrong. I've come full circle, shooting my original target.

Shoot: Jackofhearts2005

Day 4: Event


[flavour goes here later]

Sloonei pulls out a weird alien looking gun from beneath their shirt and aims it at JackofHearts2005

They pull the trigger, firing a laser beam that burns a gnarly looking hole into JoH, Jack falls over, dead. The passengers look to check who he was.

JackofHearts2005 was Remington Tarvaw:

With the results being not what the Passengers had wanted, they resume for who will be their daily vote.


Votes have been RESET. With 13 alive, it takes 7 to lynch and 3 to soft lynch. Day ends at 11:00 pm EST, or in approx. 6 hours

Well I guess we've learned... something. "Marking" is a thing that happens in this game.

vote Soneji

sorry JOH. This was the first time we've been aligned together and I blew it.

Nein.

RIP Jack - you were great at this game I hope you play with us again - it was a pleasure

What's all this talk about being "marked"? I've never seen that in a game before.

My first thought when I see something about marking is a demolition man.

I've played one game with a third party marker back on Cpi...

Does anyone else have more experience with markers? If not, I can explain what I know.

Sloonei wrote:My first thought when I see something about marking is a demolition man.

Could you explain what that is?

juliets wrote:

Sloonei wrote:My first thought when I see something about marking is a demolition man.

Could you explain what that is?

Typically an indie role. Every night it can mark a player, and at any point during the game it can choose to detonate and kill all marked players.

Sloonei wrote:

juliets wrote:

Sloonei wrote:My first thought when I see something about marking is a demolition man.

Could you explain what that is?

Typically an indie role. Every night it can mark a player, and at any point during the game it can choose to detonate and kill all marked players.

LMS?

speedchuck wrote:I've played one game with a third party marker back on Cpi...

Does anyone else have more experience with markers? If not, I can explain what I know.

please do.

speedchuck wrote:

Sloonei wrote:

juliets wrote:

Sloonei wrote:My first thought when I see something about marking is a demolition man.

Could you explain what that is?

Typically an indie role. Every night it can mark a player, and at any point during the game it can choose to detonate and kill all marked players.

LMS?

In most cases, probably.

juliets wrote:

Sloonei wrote:My first thought when I see something about marking is a demolition man.

Could you explain what that is?

No idea what a marker is or what a Demolition Man is.

Same as arsonist? Except it sounds creepier.

What's with people popping in right after the shot?

Sloonei wrote:

juliets wrote:

Sloonei wrote:My first thought when I see something about marking is a demolition man.

Could you explain what that is?

Typically an indie role. Every night it can mark a player, and at any point during the game it can choose to detonate and kill all marked players.

Well...that's fucking scary.

Bummer. Thanks for the effort JOH and we'll try to fill the void we've left. See you next time.

Oh wow. I think it's time for a glass of wine.

I hope it's a demo-man, that's my favorite anti-town independent role.