Re: A Mafia of Unfortunate Events [DAY 6]
Posted: Sat Jan 07, 2017 12:57 am
Jackofhearts2005 wrote:You're not listening.
Irony.Jackofhearts2005 wrote:You have launched yourself to the top of my scum list with your last two posts.
Murder, Mayhem, and Mafia
https://www.mafiathesyndicate.com/
Jackofhearts2005 wrote:You're not listening.
Irony.Jackofhearts2005 wrote:You have launched yourself to the top of my scum list with your last two posts.
i don't care about your scum listJackofhearts2005 wrote:You have launched yourself to the top of my scum list with your last two posts.Dom wrote:now i'm probably being a pissy little bitch that no one likes when i say this but
what the hell is anyone even talking about anymore?
Mi hope a baby eats you tonight.
It would certainly explain why Sig has apparently dropped 50 IQ points today.Golden wrote:The damning case is that you are ishmael, sig.sig wrote:linki: Quin has a damning case on MP, this has nothing to do with Jack?
OKAY SODom wrote:now i'm probably being a pissy little bitch that no one likes when i say this but
what the hell is anyone even talking about anymore?
MP - no case would be damning against Ishmael - this was a part of why I voted Quin (it seems like you didn't read that whole exchange).MovingPictures07 wrote:Golden, two questions:
1) What kind of 'evidence' would you expect to have seen re: Ishmael by now?
2) Why would any 'case' be damning if it was against Ishmael?
Mr. ILynchsomonehighonmycivlist?Jackofhearts2005 wrote:It would certainly explain why Sig has apparently dropped 50 IQ points today.Golden wrote:The damning case is that you are ishmael, sig.sig wrote:linki: Quin has a damning case on MP, this has nothing to do with Jack?
We'll see.
It's not dumb, when people don't just do what their told but instead use their own brain. Trusting people just because they say they should be trusted isn't necessarily smart mafia play.Jackofhearts2005 wrote:It would certainly explain why Sig has apparently dropped 50 IQ points today.Golden wrote:The damning case is that you are ishmael, sig.sig wrote:linki: Quin has a damning case on MP, this has nothing to do with Jack?
We'll see.
How so?Golden wrote:Jackofhearts2005 wrote:You're not listening.Irony.Jackofhearts2005 wrote:You have launched yourself to the top of my scum list with your last two posts.
I did read it; it just seemed like you were singing a different tune now which is why I asked for clarification.Golden wrote:MP - no case would be damning against Ishmael - this was a part of why I voted Quin (it seems like you didn't read that whole exchange).MovingPictures07 wrote:Golden, two questions:
1) What kind of 'evidence' would you expect to have seen re: Ishmael by now?
2) Why would any 'case' be damning if it was against Ishmael?
As for evidence... any person who is part of the cult? But I do know who I believe Ishmael to be if Ishmael is alive. Hint: not sig.
But seriously. Do you not understand how the bowl works?sig wrote:Mr. ILynchsomonehighonmycivlist?Jackofhearts2005 wrote:It would certainly explain why Sig has apparently dropped 50 IQ points today.Golden wrote:The damning case is that you are ishmael, sig.sig wrote:linki: Quin has a damning case on MP, this has nothing to do with Jack?
We'll see.
No room to talk.
Man I really wish I had voted for you. Who knows though the night is dark and full of terrors.
linki: I still think Golden could be Ishmael.
I seriously saw the word "horny" somewhere in that.sig wrote:Mr. ILynchsomonehighonmycivlist?Jackofhearts2005 wrote:It would certainly explain why Sig has apparently dropped 50 IQ points today.Golden wrote:The damning case is that you are ishmael, sig.sig wrote:linki: Quin has a damning case on MP, this has nothing to do with Jack?
We'll see.
No room to talk.
Man I really wish I had voted for you. Who knows though the night is dark and full of terrors.
linki: I still think Golden could be Ishmael.
And at this point I think that LC is dying instead of Quin.Quin wrote:Why the HELL does LC have two votes? Epi, do me a favour and lynch me will you?
I already voted.Quin wrote:Why the HELL does LC have two votes? Epi, do me a favour and lynch me will you?
Just because I say so? We both know that's not what happened.Golden wrote:It's not dumb, when people don't just do what their told but instead use their own brain. Trusting people just because they say they should be trusted isn't necessarily smart mafia play.Jackofhearts2005 wrote:It would certainly explain why Sig has apparently dropped 50 IQ points today.Golden wrote:The damning case is that you are ishmael, sig.sig wrote:linki: Quin has a damning case on MP, this has nothing to do with Jack?
We'll see.
Why?Golden wrote:At this point I think a Sorsha death will win the town the game.
Hey Epi.Epignosis wrote:I already voted.Quin wrote:Why the HELL does LC have two votes? Epi, do me a favour and lynch me will you?
MovingPictures07 wrote:I seriously saw the word "horny" somewhere in that.sig wrote:Mr. ILynchsomonehighonmycivlist?Jackofhearts2005 wrote:It would certainly explain why Sig has apparently dropped 50 IQ points today.Golden wrote:The damning case is that you are ishmael, sig.sig wrote:linki: Quin has a damning case on MP, this has nothing to do with Jack?
We'll see.
No room to talk.
Man I really wish I had voted for you. Who knows though the night is dark and full of terrors.
linki: I still think Golden could be Ishmael.
Because I believe I now know every single players role, alive and dead, with just a couple of cases where there are two people who could fit in to either of two roles.Jackofhearts2005 wrote:Why?Golden wrote:At this point I think a Sorsha death will win the town the game.
how did you know to come in the threadQuin wrote:Why the HELL does LC have two votes? Epi, do me a favour and lynch me will you?
I don't vote just because of bowls. Fuck that noise.Jackofhearts2005 wrote:Hey Epi.Epignosis wrote:I already voted.Quin wrote:Why the HELL does LC have two votes? Epi, do me a favour and lynch me will you?
Maybe you shouldn't vote for someone just cause they piss you off. You might want to change your vote later.
I just got to my hotel room.Dom wrote:how did you know to come in the threadQuin wrote:Why the HELL does LC have two votes? Epi, do me a favour and lynch me will you?
i thought you were out for the night?
Quin wrote:Ugh. Never mind.
Lets hope LC survives. If he doesn't, and we don't immediately follow up with a lynch on sig or Dom, you civs are terrible.
He specifically said he wanted LC or Jack dead to have the bowl removed from play. Bad. As far as I'm concerned that's the biggest red flag that I've seen yet, other than MP's Indy claim. Only the baddies have a motivation to remove the bowl from the game, because they're the only one it actually impacts.
My laptop won't connect to the internet so you're stuck with phone posting for a while. I probably come across 10x angrier than I really am rn
NoQuin wrote:Lets hope LC survives. If he doesn't, and we don't immediately follow up with a lynch on sig or Dom, you civs are terrible.
Indeed.Epignosis wrote:I don't vote just because of bowls. Fuck that noise.Jackofhearts2005 wrote:Hey Epi.Epignosis wrote:I already voted.Quin wrote:Why the HELL does LC have two votes? Epi, do me a favour and lynch me will you?
Maybe you shouldn't vote for someone just cause they piss you off. You might want to change your vote later.
That's a sentence I'd never thought I'd say.
That's convenient.Golden wrote:Because I believe I now know every single players role, alive and dead, with just a couple of cases where there are two people who could fit in to either of two roles.Jackofhearts2005 wrote:Why?Golden wrote:At this point I think a Sorsha death will win the town the game.
Because I slowly and methodically work through things logically in order to get the town the win.
So let's hear him speculate.MovingPictures07 wrote:Let's not engage in role outing please. This phase has already been too close to it way too often for my taste. Role speculation is OK I guess, but meh.
I'm not going to say that. But given that was my list of three earlier today, you might be able to think on it and see what conclusion I've reached.Jackofhearts2005 wrote:That's convenient.Golden wrote:Because I believe I now know every single players role, alive and dead, with just a couple of cases where there are two people who could fit in to either of two roles.Jackofhearts2005 wrote:Why?Golden wrote:At this point I think a Sorsha death will win the town the game.
Because I slowly and methodically work through things logically in order to get the town the win.
Who are Daisy and MP?
Funny story? I never read my role. I wonder if my team is winning or not.MovingPictures07 wrote:Let's not engage in role outing please. This phase has already been too close to it way too often for my taste. Role speculation is OK I guess, but meh.
You're bad too byeGolden wrote:NoQuin wrote:Lets hope LC survives. If he doesn't, and we don't immediately follow up with a lynch on sig or Dom, you civs are terrible.
Well, not really bye, because we're both going to be alive come night time.Quin wrote:You're bad too byeGolden wrote:NoQuin wrote:Lets hope LC survives. If he doesn't, and we don't immediately follow up with a lynch on sig or Dom, you civs are terrible.
I'm like, 95% sure!MovingPictures07 wrote:If Sorsha is the last scum... I can't even.
Bowls are stupid anyway. I don't even want the thing.sig wrote:Btw Anybody who doesn't laugh at my jokey post is getting killed tonight.
Also I thought Jack had the bowl why do you care if I through a vote at LC?
Also I don't like Quin wanting to lynch me, maybe if they hadn't have been all clandestine "we have BTSC just follow us" type junk all day we'd have gotten something out of this day.
I could go with a Sorsha vote I guess, unless something pops up tonight. I do think we have at least two baddies left though.
linki:
I won't vote for her.Golden wrote:I'm like, 95% sure!MovingPictures07 wrote:If Sorsha is the last scum... I can't even.![]()
![]()
![]()
I mean, how sure are you that it isn't Daisy?
Yeah, I'm pretty sure it's sorsha then.MovingPictures07 wrote:I won't vote for her.Golden wrote:I'm like, 95% sure!MovingPictures07 wrote:If Sorsha is the last scum... I can't even.![]()
![]()
![]()
I mean, how sure are you that it isn't Daisy?
Nah. Too much happened today for sig to have sorsha I the front of his mind. He has credibility as long as I'm alive, he's gonna milk that with as many mislynches as he can.sig wrote:Btw Anybody who doesn't laugh at my jokey post is getting killed tonight.
Also I thought Jack had the bowl why do you care if I through a vote at LC?
Also I don't like Quin wanting to lynch me, maybe if they hadn't have been all clandestine "we have BTSC just follow us" type junk all day we'd have gotten something out of this day.
I could go with a Sorsha vote I guess, unless something pops up tonight. I do think we have at least two baddies left though.
linki:
Soneji voted Glorf though, so he could have been bad but unlikely. If I had to bet on a dead baddie I'd say Nacho or maybe INH. (Unless he is Klaus which he could be)Golden wrote:Daisy did defend Soneji...![]()
Now I'm back toon Daisy.
Curious.MovingPictures07 wrote:I won't vote for her.Golden wrote:I'm like, 95% sure!MovingPictures07 wrote:If Sorsha is the last scum... I can't even.![]()
![]()
![]()
I mean, how sure are you that it isn't Daisy?