Page 68 of 84

Re: Harry Stephen Keeler [NIGHT 6]

Posted: Mon Apr 06, 2015 5:38 am
by S~V~S
I didn't think he was tedious :shrug:

Dearborn.

Re: Harry Stephen Keeler [NIGHT 6]

Posted: Mon Apr 06, 2015 10:10 am
by Bass_the_Clever
hey everyone sorry about missing the vote it was a busy Easter.

Re: Harry Stephen Keeler [NIGHT 6]

Posted: Mon Apr 06, 2015 10:15 am
by Bass_the_Clever
Dom wrote:i think the baddies put the safe up there to make us scared.
I think I agree with this because there really isn't a price for the safe. I would think they would want one of the five treasures that they need.

Re: Harry Stephen Keeler [NIGHT 6]

Posted: Mon Apr 06, 2015 10:28 am
by Dom
Bass_the_Clever wrote:
Dom wrote:i think the baddies put the safe up there to make us scared.
I think I agree with this because there really isn't a price for the safe. I would think they would want one of the five treasures that they need.
Exactly. There doesn't seem to be a logical reason for this tbh.

Re: Harry Stephen Keeler [NIGHT 6]

Posted: Mon Apr 06, 2015 10:51 am
by Marmot
S~V~S wrote:I didn't think he was tedious :shrug:

Dearborn.
I don't think he was either. Rereading him was though, and there were reasons for me rereading him which I won't share yet.

Re: Harry Stephen Keeler [NIGHT 6]

Posted: Mon Apr 06, 2015 10:56 am
by Marmot
Bass_the_Clever wrote:
Dom wrote:i think the baddies put the safe up there to make us scared.
I think I agree with this because there really isn't a price for the safe. I would think they would want one of the five treasures that they need.
I feel more comfortable with this reasoning. However, I read it as the person who wants to trade the safe away offered not targetting Celestials as a prerequisite for trading, not as a bargaining chip. To the instigator, the safe is only for sale if the mafia will agree to terms.

Re: Harry Stephen Keeler [NIGHT 6]

Posted: Mon Apr 06, 2015 11:06 am
by juliets
Dearborn St.

Re: Harry Stephen Keeler [NIGHT 6]

Posted: Mon Apr 06, 2015 11:35 am
by Turnip Head
Clark Street

Re: Harry Stephen Keeler [NIGHT 6]

Posted: Mon Apr 06, 2015 11:53 am
by Bass_the_Clever
I voted Clark St.

Re: Harry Stephen Keeler [NIGHT 6]

Posted: Mon Apr 06, 2015 11:58 am
by Bass_the_Clever
Metalmarsh89 wrote:
Bass_the_Clever wrote:
Dom wrote:i think the baddies put the safe up there to make us scared.
I think I agree with this because there really isn't a price for the safe. I would think they would want one of the five treasures that they need.
I feel more comfortable with this reasoning. However, I read it as the person who wants to trade the safe away offered not targetting Celestials as a prerequisite for trading, not as a bargaining chip. To the instigator, the safe is only for sale if the mafia will agree to terms.
Or Dom is one of the Celestials and he is trying to play the civves...

Re: Harry Stephen Keeler [NIGHT 6]

Posted: Mon Apr 06, 2015 12:23 pm
by juliets
Bass_the_Clever wrote:
Metalmarsh89 wrote:
Bass_the_Clever wrote:
Dom wrote:i think the baddies put the safe up there to make us scared.
I think I agree with this because there really isn't a price for the safe. I would think they would want one of the five treasures that they need.
I feel more comfortable with this reasoning. However, I read it as the person who wants to trade the safe away offered not targetting Celestials as a prerequisite for trading, not as a bargaining chip. To the instigator, the safe is only for sale if the mafia will agree to terms.
Or Dom is one of the Celestials and he is trying to play the civves...
But even if he is a celestial, and even if the celestials really did put that item up for sale (which I seriously doubt) there is no way the baddies can promise not to target a celestial. They don't know who is celestial and who is civ. I truly don't believe Dom is just trying to pull the wool over our eyes because the whole thing just doesn't make sense.

Re: Harry Stephen Keeler [NIGHT 6]

Posted: Mon Apr 06, 2015 12:43 pm
by rabbit8
RIP Liz

Re: Harry Stephen Keeler [NIGHT 6]

Posted: Mon Apr 06, 2015 12:54 pm
by Marmot
Bass_the_Clever wrote:
Metalmarsh89 wrote:
Bass_the_Clever wrote:
Dom wrote:i think the baddies put the safe up there to make us scared.
I think I agree with this because there really isn't a price for the safe. I would think they would want one of the five treasures that they need.
I feel more comfortable with this reasoning. However, I read it as the person who wants to trade the safe away offered not targetting Celestials as a prerequisite for trading, not as a bargaining chip. To the instigator, the safe is only for sale if the mafia will agree to terms.
Or Dom is one of the Celestials and he is trying to play the civves...
Dom is not a Celestial, I can almost guarantee you that.

Re: Harry Stephen Keeler [NIGHT 6]

Posted: Mon Apr 06, 2015 5:13 pm
by thellama73
45 minutes to go, missing two PMs!

Re: Harry Stephen Keeler Polls

Posted: Mon Apr 06, 2015 5:59 pm
by thellama73
Where to, Charlie?

Poll runs till Mon Apr 06, 2015 6:00:55 pm

Archer Ave.
0
No votes

Clark St.
5
DFaraday (4), Metalmarsh89 (7), Turnip Head (13), Bass_the_Clever (14), rabbit8 (15)
31%

Dearborn St.
5
Dom (6), S~V~S (9), juliets (10), Bullzeye (12), Black Rock (16)
31%

Randolph St.
1
Canucklehead (11)
6%

22nd St.
2
Vompatti (2), Elohcin (3)
13%

Someplace I can get a deep dish pizza.(Host/Mod/Dead/NP)
3
thellama73 (1), Epignosis (5), LizKeen (8)
19%


Total votes : 16

Re: Harry Stephen Keeler [NIGHT 6]

Posted: Mon Apr 06, 2015 5:59 pm
by thellama73
DAY 7
Image

Re: Harry Stephen Keeler [DAY 7]

Posted: Mon Apr 06, 2015 6:06 pm
by Bullzeye
Two deaths tonight? That's new... and unnerving.

Re: Harry Stephen Keeler [NIGHT 6]

Posted: Mon Apr 06, 2015 6:08 pm
by Dom
juliets wrote:
Bass_the_Clever wrote:
Metalmarsh89 wrote:
Bass_the_Clever wrote:
Dom wrote:i think the baddies put the safe up there to make us scared.
I think I agree with this because there really isn't a price for the safe. I would think they would want one of the five treasures that they need.
I feel more comfortable with this reasoning. However, I read it as the person who wants to trade the safe away offered not targetting Celestials as a prerequisite for trading, not as a bargaining chip. To the instigator, the safe is only for sale if the mafia will agree to terms.
Or Dom is one of the Celestials and he is trying to play the civves...
But even if he is a celestial, and even if the celestials really did put that item up for sale (which I seriously doubt) there is no way the baddies can promise not to target a celestial. They don't know who is celestial and who is civ. I truly don't believe Dom is just trying to pull the wool over our eyes because the whole thing just doesn't make sense.
this.
Metalmarsh89 wrote:
Bass_the_Clever wrote:
Metalmarsh89 wrote:
Bass_the_Clever wrote:
Dom wrote:i think the baddies put the safe up there to make us scared.
I think I agree with this because there really isn't a price for the safe. I would think they would want one of the five treasures that they need.
I feel more comfortable with this reasoning. However, I read it as the person who wants to trade the safe away offered not targetting Celestials as a prerequisite for trading, not as a bargaining chip. To the instigator, the safe is only for sale if the mafia will agree to terms.
Or Dom is one of the Celestials and he is trying to play the civves...
Dom is not a Celestial, I can almost guarantee you that.
that's a bold move.

Re: Harry Stephen Keeler [DAY 7]

Posted: Mon Apr 06, 2015 6:11 pm
by Dom
Bullzeye wrote:Two deaths tonight? That's new... and unnerving.
tbh

Re: Harry Stephen Keeler [DAY 7]

Posted: Mon Apr 06, 2015 6:19 pm
by juliets
RIP DF and Metalmarsh :rip: and i agree I am most unnerved by this development.

Re: Harry Stephen Keeler [DAY 7]

Posted: Mon Apr 06, 2015 6:30 pm
by Marmot
tfw when you spend like 4 hours rereading everyone and find out you are dead. :(

Re: Harry Stephen Keeler [DAY 7]

Posted: Mon Apr 06, 2015 6:32 pm
by Black Rock
RIP guys. Was he poisoned then? I didn't think there was a poisoner in this game.

Re: Harry Stephen Keeler [DAY 7]

Posted: Mon Apr 06, 2015 6:32 pm
by Black Rock
He meaning DF.

Re: Harry Stephen Keeler [DAY 7]

Posted: Mon Apr 06, 2015 6:36 pm
by Canucklehead
I think there's a doctor on the baddie team that does vaguely worded baddie things.....which I would be very willing to interpret as poisoning and the like, given recent events.

Re: Harry Stephen Keeler [DAY 7]

Posted: Mon Apr 06, 2015 6:44 pm
by Black Rock
Oh ok, that makes sense. Had to go back and read the role but that looks like what happened.

Re: Harry Stephen Keeler [DAY 7]

Posted: Mon Apr 06, 2015 7:17 pm
by Dom
Canucklehead wrote:I think there's a doctor on the baddie team that does vaguely worded baddie things.....which I would be very willing to interpret as poisoning and the like, given recent events.
Canuck where are your thoughts right now?

Re: Harry Stephen Keeler [DAY 7]

Posted: Mon Apr 06, 2015 7:27 pm
by rabbit8
Dom wrote:
Canucklehead wrote:I think there's a doctor on the baddie team that does vaguely worded baddie things.....which I would be very willing to interpret as poisoning and the like, given recent events.
Canuck where are your thoughts right now?

Baddie thought most likely. :nicenod:

Re: Harry Stephen Keeler [DAY 7]

Posted: Mon Apr 06, 2015 8:10 pm
by S~V~S
I don't know about you guys, but I had an awesome weekend! :biggrin: We had a big family party of Saturday for my sisters birthday :biggrin: Then we had Easter with all the cousins & the cousins kids, so we had almost 25 kids egg hunting, then egg rolling. Plus tons of wine, snacks and good times :biggrin:

Then next weekend is Orthodox Easter, and I get to do it all again (with even MORE people) with the other side of the family :biggrin:

Squeeeee!!!!! :biggrin:

Re: Harry Stephen Keeler [DAY 7]

Posted: Mon Apr 06, 2015 8:24 pm
by juliets
I have another idea. Remember how Sandringham takes on different roles and uses their powers? Could he have taken on the millionaire's power last night and killed DF thinking he was a baddie?

Re: Harry Stephen Keeler [DAY 7]

Posted: Mon Apr 06, 2015 8:27 pm
by Turnip Head
Rest in peace Marshy and DF :( I agree it looks like a poisoning of some sort.

Re: Harry Stephen Keeler [DAY 7]

Posted: Mon Apr 06, 2015 8:28 pm
by Turnip Head
juliets wrote:I have another idea. Remember how Sandringham takes on different roles and uses their powers? Could he have taken on the millionaire's power last night and killed DF thinking he was a baddie?
I really like this idea. I didn't think of it. It could explain it... frankly I thought DF was a weird person for the baddies to target so this would make sense.

Re: Harry Stephen Keeler [DAY 7]

Posted: Mon Apr 06, 2015 8:37 pm
by Marmot
Also, rezz please. I don't care which one of me. :mafia:

Re: Harry Stephen Keeler [DAY 7]

Posted: Mon Apr 06, 2015 9:44 pm
by Dom
I guess we'll find out at the end of the game.

TH-- where you at?

Re: Harry Stephen Keeler [DAY 7]

Posted: Mon Apr 06, 2015 11:01 pm
by Long Con
AAAAA
EEEEE
IIIII
OOOOO
UUUUU
YYYYY

Re: Harry Stephen Keeler [DAY 7]

Posted: Mon Apr 06, 2015 11:13 pm
by Turnip Head
Dom wrote:I guess we'll find out at the end of the game.

TH-- where you at?
I'm going to reread Canuck and Elo when I get home. They are two players who I usually have some sort of opinion on by now, and both of them have evaded my radar so far. I thought that Elo's reactions during Epi's lynch felt a little out of character so I'm going to start my search there.

I had also planned to look into DF but that's moot now. I was also worried about Bass but MM said something re: Bass that made me take pause. Id'd like to know where Bass is looking for this lynch.

Where you at Dom?

Re: Harry Stephen Keeler [DAY 7]

Posted: Mon Apr 06, 2015 11:14 pm
by Turnip Head
Long Con wrote:AAAAA
EEEEE
IIIII
OOOOO
UUUUU
YYYYY
Eh? :leaf:

Re: Harry Stephen Keeler [DAY 7]

Posted: Mon Apr 06, 2015 11:54 pm
by Dom
Turnip Head wrote:
Dom wrote:I guess we'll find out at the end of the game.

TH-- where you at?
I'm going to reread Canuck and Elo when I get home. They are two players who I usually have some sort of opinion on by now, and both of them have evaded my radar so far. I thought that Elo's reactions during Epi's lynch felt a little out of character so I'm going to start my search there.

I had also planned to look into DF but that's moot now. I was also worried about Bass but MM said something re: Bass that made me take pause. Id'd like to know where Bass is looking for this lynch.

Where you at Dom?
I don't suspect Bass because LC was right that it's unlikely that if they switched roles that MM and Bass are on different alliances.

Elo-- I usually have no opinion on her. So, IDK about that.

Cancuk-- I usually have a read. A quick reread had nothing of substance tbqh. That concerns me.

I'm also suspicious of SVS.

Re: Harry Stephen Keeler [DAY 7]

Posted: Tue Apr 07, 2015 12:15 am
by Turnip Head
I've reread early-game Canuck, and this is the only post that sticks out to me atm:
Canucklehead wrote:Sorry for not being around, my participation will increase as the game goes on and once RR is done...but you know me. I'm useless until I get my bearings and get drawn in to a game.
Canuck said she would get more talkative as the game went on, but the opposite has actually been true. In my estimation, Canuck had more posts and meatier posts during the first half of the game, and she has gradually dropped off since then. She posted four times on Day 5 and only once on Day 6.

That's not to say that Canuck hasn't made her opinions clearly known... I think that she has. She just doesn't seem as involved as I might expect her to be by now.

Re: Harry Stephen Keeler [DAY 7]

Posted: Tue Apr 07, 2015 12:18 am
by Dom
Turnip Head wrote:I've reread early-game Canuck, and this is the only post that sticks out to me atm:
Canucklehead wrote:Sorry for not being around, my participation will increase as the game goes on and once RR is done...but you know me. I'm useless until I get my bearings and get drawn in to a game.
Canuck said she would get more talkative as the game went on, but the opposite has actually been true. In my estimation, Canuck had more posts and meatier posts during the first half of the game, and she has gradually dropped off since then. She posted four times on Day 5 and only once on Day 6.

That's not to say that Canuck hasn't made her opinions clearly known... I think that she has. She just doesn't seem as involved as I might expect her to be by now.
Does that mean something to you though? I used to know Canuck's game much better than I do at this point.

Re: Harry Stephen Keeler [DAY 7]

Posted: Tue Apr 07, 2015 12:20 am
by Turnip Head
No it doesn't mean anything to me yet, I'm more interested in hearing her response to it if anything. I've felt she's been rational and cautious this game; that is behavior that would benefit both civvies and baddies.

Re: Harry Stephen Keeler [DAY 7]

Posted: Tue Apr 07, 2015 12:53 am
by Canucklehead
I think I've mentioned this before, but my prelims start in 6 days. The fact that I am posting at all is ridiculous, tbqh.
My posting rate will not increase. I will keep voting, and keep posting when I have a moment, but that's really all you should expect from me. I'm utterly useless other than as a civ number, but I'm definitely not a baddie. :shrug:

Re: Harry Stephen Keeler [DAY 7]

Posted: Tue Apr 07, 2015 5:51 am
by S~V~S
All the snow finally melted :biggrin:

This has been a horrible winter (two in a row!) but it is finally over now :biggrin: :biggrin:

Have a fun day, catch you guys later :biggrin:

Re: Harry Stephen Keeler [DAY 7]

Posted: Tue Apr 07, 2015 7:54 am
by Dom
Convenient.

Re: Harry Stephen Keeler [DAY 7]

Posted: Tue Apr 07, 2015 9:51 am
by rabbit8
I'm all for voting Canuck and SVS.

Or Dom and TH. ......... :grin:

Re: Harry Stephen Keeler [DAY 7]

Posted: Tue Apr 07, 2015 9:56 am
by Long Con
ae iuo uyioa eaoiyuae aeeiuyo aoyoaeu aoiuaeya a iuyuiea oyaeu

Re: Harry Stephen Keeler [DAY 7]

Posted: Tue Apr 07, 2015 10:02 am
by Dom
rabbit8 wrote:I'm all for voting Canuck and SVS.

Or Dom and TH. ......... :grin:
Hilarious, yes....but...

Why group me and TH?

Re: Harry Stephen Keeler [DAY 7]

Posted: Tue Apr 07, 2015 10:26 am
by rabbit8
Dom wrote:
rabbit8 wrote:I'm all for voting Canuck and SVS.

Or Dom and TH. ......... :grin:
Hilarious, yes....but...

Why group me and TH?

Just an observation of the game. I could see you two being on one side of the coin if SVS and or Canuck are not bad. :shrug:

Re: Harry Stephen Keeler [DAY 7]

Posted: Tue Apr 07, 2015 12:24 pm
by Black Rock
So LC and SVS have a posting curse again?

I'm going to read over Canuck today. Make my own opinion on her.

Re: Harry Stephen Keeler [DAY 7]

Posted: Tue Apr 07, 2015 12:43 pm
by Bass_the_Clever
what do people think of bwt?

Re: Harry Stephen Keeler [DAY 7]

Posted: Tue Apr 07, 2015 1:15 pm
by Black Rock
I haven't suspected him at all.