Re: Pirate Mafia [DAY 1]
Posted: Tue Oct 31, 2017 8:46 pm
What specifically is respectable about it?speedchuck wrote: ↑Tue Oct 31, 2017 12:09 pmA respectable readlist, but for one exception.
Care to elaborate?
What specifically is respectable about it?speedchuck wrote: ↑Tue Oct 31, 2017 12:09 pmA respectable readlist, but for one exception.
Care to elaborate?
Thank you, sorry for the run-around but this has helped a lot.
Yikes.Kylemii wrote: ↑Tue Oct 31, 2017 12:59 pmJust because I'm not throwing accusations yet doesn't mean I'm not working. On day one I suspected you for being too gung-ho so I asked everyone the dog thing and found out that that's kind of just who you are as a person along with some other stuff.speedchuck wrote: ↑Tue Oct 31, 2017 11:29 amIs Kylemii an old player here (or elsewhere)? I know he's trying to find his footing, but some trends in mafia are ubiquitous. You're in here, Kyle. I'm expecting more.
Now I'm working on something else
What specifically do you want out of me?
I was honestly just a little annoyed that I was being talked down to.MovingPictures07 wrote: ↑Tue Oct 31, 2017 8:50 pmYikes.Kylemii wrote: ↑Tue Oct 31, 2017 12:59 pmJust because I'm not throwing accusations yet doesn't mean I'm not working. On day one I suspected you for being too gung-ho so I asked everyone the dog thing and found out that that's kind of just who you are as a person along with some other stuff.speedchuck wrote: ↑Tue Oct 31, 2017 11:29 amIs Kylemii an old player here (or elsewhere)? I know he's trying to find his footing, but some trends in mafia are ubiquitous. You're in here, Kyle. I'm expecting more.
Now I'm working on something else
What specifically do you want out of me?
This is not indicative of a townie mindset.
Thought you have looked good so far, but Iwould like your one elaborate on what compelledyou to say this @![]()
MovingPictures07 wrote: ↑Tue Oct 31, 2017 8:54 pm Oh I see I’m joining a wagon
Still going ti keep my vote there but I don’t think we should let anyone become a consensus or avoid putting pressure on as many people as possible. Spread the love around. Lol
Hey, buddy pal friend, not super terribly fond of this here move.MovingPictures07 wrote: ↑Tue Oct 31, 2017 8:54 pm Oh I see I’m joining a wagon
Still going ti keep my vote there but I don’t think we should let anyone become a consensus or avoid putting pressure on as many people as possible. Spread the love around. Lol
I suppose that makes sense. I’m not inspired but I’m not keen to lynch you on your first game back unless I really think you’re bad.Kylemii wrote: ↑Tue Oct 31, 2017 8:56 pmI was honestly just a little annoyed that I was being talked down to.MovingPictures07 wrote: ↑Tue Oct 31, 2017 8:50 pmYikes.Kylemii wrote: ↑Tue Oct 31, 2017 12:59 pmJust because I'm not throwing accusations yet doesn't mean I'm not working. On day one I suspected you for being too gung-ho so I asked everyone the dog thing and found out that that's kind of just who you are as a person along with some other stuff.speedchuck wrote: ↑Tue Oct 31, 2017 11:29 amIs Kylemii an old player here (or elsewhere)? I know he's trying to find his footing, but some trends in mafia are ubiquitous. You're in here, Kyle. I'm expecting more.
Now I'm working on something else
What specifically do you want out of me?
This is not indicative of a townie mindset.
Thought you have looked good so far, but Iwould like your one elaborate on what compelledyou to say this @![]()
I'll have to give it to you. I don't think I've ever seen fake claiming as a civ being used in a good way.MovingPictures07 wrote: ↑Tue Oct 31, 2017 8:44 pm Fake claiming is a legit strategy. I vehemently argue that, I feel done well, it can win the game for town.
Turnip Head and I assisted the cop (Daisy) in Arrested Development with fake cop claims which resulted in Dais being able to singlehandedly solve the entire game.
Fake claiming isn’t without risks, but I can’t fathom why anyone would argue against it in principle.
It's the first rainbow list we've had in this game.
We have an 8-way lynch tie right now.MovingPictures07 wrote: ↑Tue Oct 31, 2017 8:54 pm Oh I see I’m joining a wagon
Still going ti keep my vote there but I don’t think we should let anyone become a consensus or avoid putting pressure on as many people as possible. Spread the love around. Lol
I agree with this. Scumdar10 rating for MP07: 5.9Kylemii wrote: ↑Tue Oct 31, 2017 9:03 pmHey, buddy pal friend, not super terribly fond of this here move.MovingPictures07 wrote: ↑Tue Oct 31, 2017 8:54 pm Oh I see I’m joining a wagon
Still going ti keep my vote there but I don’t think we should let anyone become a consensus or avoid putting pressure on as many people as possible. Spread the love around. Lol
Guys please keep it PG this is a FAMILY website. Think of the CHILDREN :/MovingPictures07 wrote: ↑Tue Oct 31, 2017 12:18 am I guess I’ll move my vote to Daisy now. I need to hear what she’s thinking.
I don't understand how you can form an assumption like this on Day 1. Does this mean you're currently town-reading all the other active players?sig wrote: ↑Tue Oct 31, 2017 10:23 pm Switched to NewTraditionalist until they post.
I didn't read Kyle's post as that odd or pingy.
I figured MP was messing/flirting with you over that vote Daisy, I'm surprised you're taking it that way.
I've got nothing else to add besides the fact that I think either DDL or LC is bad, but not both. The other baddies are either semi active or inactive I believe. I must be off for the time, but I'll be back tomorrow.
It also had some good townreads on it. I was the one egregious error.Dragon D. Luffy wrote: ↑Tue Oct 31, 2017 9:18 pmIt's the first rainbow list we've had in this game.
Probably not. My vote will probably go to a no-poster.speedchuck wrote: ↑Tue Oct 31, 2017 11:36 pmIt also had some good townreads on it. I was the one egregious error.Dragon D. Luffy wrote: ↑Tue Oct 31, 2017 9:18 pmIt's the first rainbow list we've had in this game.
Quin, you're really going to stick to No Lynch?
are you saying my opinion is wrong?Spacedaisy wrote: ↑Tue Oct 31, 2017 8:32 pmI would not call it the norm for The Syndicate. In fact people are split in it here because culture began in a strict no role claiming no info
Dumping rule set.
I find it difficult to see why you can't at leDy acknowledge there are pros to fake claims from civs. They can and have won games for civilians. But as with any strategy there are risks inherent. I can acknowledgethat. Can you not see the advantages that they provide as well?
I am not telling people to fake role claim. I don't feel the need to tell others how to play. But I am disagreeing with this assertion that fake role claims are bad. And I can both believe fake role claims are good and that people should build cases. There is room for both.
Quin wrote: ↑Tue Oct 31, 2017 11:49 pmProbably not. My vote will probably go to a no-poster.speedchuck wrote: ↑Tue Oct 31, 2017 11:36 pmIt also had some good townreads on it. I was the one egregious error.Dragon D. Luffy wrote: ↑Tue Oct 31, 2017 9:18 pmIt's the first rainbow list we've had in this game.
Quin, you're really going to stick to No Lynch?
I'm just saying I feel like you are looking at the negatives and dismissing any positives. And they are there. But we could probably move this conversation to somewhere in the lounge since it's really a discussion of theory. Also I read mydunya wrote: ↑Wed Nov 01, 2017 11:01 amare you saying my opinion is wrong?Spacedaisy wrote: ↑Tue Oct 31, 2017 8:32 pmI would not call it the norm for The Syndicate. In fact people are split in it here because culture began in a strict no role claiming no info
Dumping rule set.
I find it difficult to see why you can't at leDy acknowledge there are pros to fake claims from civs. They can and have won games for civilians. But as with any strategy there are risks inherent. I can acknowledgethat. Can you not see the advantages that they provide as well?
I am not telling people to fake role claim. I don't feel the need to tell others how to play. But I am disagreeing with this assertion that fake role claims are bad. And I can both believe fake role claims are good and that people should build cases. There is room for both.![]()
Last month? We played streetfighter together and then I subbed in Jay's game where he was also town.Dragon D. Luffy wrote: ↑Wed Nov 01, 2017 12:35 pmWhen was your last game with him. His playstyle has had a lot of changes in the last few years.
So are you saying that his playstyle looks like Civ MP?Dragon D. Luffy wrote: ↑Wed Nov 01, 2017 12:35 pmWhen was your last game with him. His playstyle has had a lot of changes in the last few years.
Yes ma'am, perfect sense. It will be our first time to agree to disagree on this point. Still got mad love for ya.Spacedaisy wrote: ↑Wed Nov 01, 2017 12:26 pmI'm just saying I feel like you are looking at the negatives and dismissing any positives. And they are there. But we could probably move this conversation to somewhere in the lounge since it's really a discussion of theory. Also I read mydunya wrote: ↑Wed Nov 01, 2017 11:01 amare you saying my opinion is wrong?Spacedaisy wrote: ↑Tue Oct 31, 2017 8:32 pmI would not call it the norm for The Syndicate. In fact people are split in it here because culture began in a strict no role claiming no info
Dumping rule set.
I find it difficult to see why you can't at leDy acknowledge there are pros to fake claims from civs. They can and have won games for civilians. But as with any strategy there are risks inherent. I can acknowledgethat. Can you not see the advantages that they provide as well?
I am not telling people to fake role claim. I don't feel the need to tell others how to play. But I am disagreeing with this assertion that fake role claims are bad. And I can both believe fake role claims are good and that people should build cases. There is room for both.![]()
Post again and felt it was kind of condescending and I didn't intend it as such. I said I didn't feel the need to tell others how to play, all i meant was I was not discussing what we should be doing, just a theory basically. Does that make sense?
Quin, while I hate to fight you on this especially after 3 of the mafia in the Seinfeld game were low-posters, isn't there anyone who HAS contributed itt who you feel iffy about? That person, if someone else and someone third agrees with you on, should be lynched before someone who hasn't yet even had a chance to defend themselves. And that person can also make an effort to defend his/herself and change your mind.DrWilgy wrote: ↑Wed Nov 01, 2017 12:10 pmQuin wrote: ↑Tue Oct 31, 2017 11:49 pmProbably not. My vote will probably go to a no-poster.speedchuck wrote: ↑Tue Oct 31, 2017 11:36 pmIt also had some good townreads on it. I was the one egregious error.Dragon D. Luffy wrote: ↑Tue Oct 31, 2017 9:18 pmIt's the first rainbow list we've had in this game.
Quin, you're really going to stick to No Lynch?![]()
![]()
![]()
hey mister, don't you be using your RL dissertation as an excuse to weasel your way out of our suspicions if you're mafia, mmmmkay?MovingPictures07 wrote: ↑Wed Nov 01, 2017 12:40 pm I’m sorry I haven’t been able to commit fully to this game. I have had RL get in the way and unfortunately I need to get this proposal stuff prepped ASAP. I hate not being current with the deadline so close but I have no choice. I’ll be in when I can.
On the plus side LCD was epic. The weather was horrific though (50F and raining), and my phone despite having a life proof case got water inside which is why I couldn’t type anymore last night.
I'm not sure. I've never learned to read MP well. I just spotted a possible misconception that I've seen people make before.Long Con wrote: ↑Wed Nov 01, 2017 12:39 pmSo are you saying that his playstyle looks like Civ MP?Dragon D. Luffy wrote: ↑Wed Nov 01, 2017 12:35 pmWhen was your last game with him. His playstyle has had a lot of changes in the last few years.